Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 19 2016
-
- Nomination Upper part of a Roman grave stela showing the heads of a married couple, set up into the outside wall at the apsis` crest of the parish church Saints Michael and George in Moosburg, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:07, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:39, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roman pilaster relief from a tomb, showing a dancer on top of an acanthus flower, put into the outside south wall of the parish church Saints Michael and George, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 04:07, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 04:39, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mount Lekanda, viewed from Gorbea. Panoramic view over the Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 21:28, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Clear and sharp, give good sense of distance. Good quality. --Caballero1967 21:51, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Casa de la Dehesa: country house in a park. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 21:17, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 21:29, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Casa de la Dehesa: country house in a park. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 21:15, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 21:52, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kõiguste harbour (by A.Hiiumaamudeliklubi). Kruusamägi 20:54, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Quite sharp! Can see the details from a distance Good quality. --Caballero1967 21:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Abteibrücke, Berlin-Treptow (1). --Code 20:39, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:10, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Abteibrücke, Berlin-Treptow (3). --Code 20:39, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:10, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination L'église Saint-Grégoire en Turquie --Armenak Margarian 20:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Sharp, balanced, and leveled, Good quality. --Caballero1967 21:49, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mount Aldamin, viewed from Gorbea. Panoramic view over the Basque Country, Spain. --Basotxerri 18:54, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:01, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sabine Bätzing-Lichtenthäler, member of the German Bundestag. By User:Foto-AG Gymnasium Melle Olaf Kosinsky 18:20, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 18:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Peter Tauber, member of the German Bundestag. By User:Foto-AG Gymnasium Melle Olaf Kosinsky 18:20, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 18:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jürgen Trittin, member of the German Bundestag. By User:Foto-AG Gymnasium Melle Olaf Kosinsky 18:20, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 18:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lena Strothmann, member of the German Bundestag. By User:Foto-AG Gymnasium Melle Olaf Kosinsky 18:20, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 18:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wolfgang Strengmann-Kuhn, member of the German Bundestag. By User:Foto-AG Gymnasium Melle Olaf Kosinsky 18:20, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 18:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Casa de la Dehesa: country house in a park. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 18:11, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 18:17, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Slongkop ("snake head") light house. --Prosthetic Head 16:49, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Decline All fine details are missing. And by the way - it is possible to keep the metadata also in a HDR --Cccefalon 17:38, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Diakonievene. Nature of It Fryske Gea.
--Famberhorst 16:19, 16 February 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 18:17, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Diakonievene. Nature of It Fryske Gea.
-
- Nomination Headshot of a Black Girdled Lizard --Prosthetic Head 15:42, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:50, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle of Somaén, Soria, Spain --Poco a poco 15:29, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Panoramic. We need more of those. Good quality. --Caballero1967 21:57, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Command Headquarters of Ceuta, Ceuta, Spain --Poco a poco 15:29, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:22, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hospital San Juan de Dios, El Puerto de Santa María, Cádiz, Spain --Poco a poco 15:29, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nuévalos, Zaragoza, Spain --Poco a poco 15:29, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination La Miñosa, Guadalajara, Spain --Poco a poco 15:29, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plaque on the Saint John the Baptist Church, Catacaos, Peru --Bgag 14:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Construction of Nuremberg-Erfurt high-speed railway in Breitengüßbach --Ermell 13:40, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pulpit in the parish church St.Otto in Bamberg --Ermell 13:40, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of Saint Peter in the parish church St.Otto in Bamberg --Ermell 13:40, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:50, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rafiki in The Lion King at the Disney Magic On Parade in Disneyland Paris. -- Medium69 12:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Disney Character illustrating The Lion King at the Disney Magic On Parade in Disneyland Paris. -- Medium69 12:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC) Comment Very nice but COM:FOP#France isn't allow, the characters are copyright of Disney Co., are you sure that we can host it here? Ezarate 13:58, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Possibly copyrights issues must be talked on a DR Ezarate 01:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Disney Character illustrating Pinocchio at the Disney Magic On Parade in Disneyland Paris. -- Medium69 12:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Supermicro AOC-S3108L-H8iR SAS RAID controller (2 softboxes, focus stacking, background/shadows separation). --Nosachevd 11:43, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion There is one issue with the shadow, see my note. --Cccefalon 12:40, 16 February 2016 (UTC) Can't do much about it. These are not artifical shadows. There was two light sources placed symmetrically with 2:1 power. --Nosachevd 13:12, 16 February 2016 (UTC) Сф
Perhaps you should retouch it, it struck me on first glance. Beside that, well done. --Cccefalon 13:54, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Polydrusus--SilviaCoimbra 10:40, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. You could even try to nominate it as Featured Picture. --Uoaei1 14:04, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Supermicro SBI-7228R-T2X blade server (2 softboxes, focus stacking, background/shadows separation) --Nosachevd 10:16, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion 2 MPix out of a 16 MPix camera ... can you please provide a reasonable higher resolution? --Cccefalon 10:25, 16 February 2016 (UTC) --Nosachevd 10:39, 16 February 2016 (UTC) Done
Thank you; much more reasonable in that resolution. Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:56, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Calvary in Heiligenkreuz, Lower Austria --Hubertl 09:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:14, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Maria-Theresia monument, artist: Kaspar von Zumbusch (errected 1874-1888), side figure --Hubertl 09:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:14, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Facade figure Kunsthistorisches Museum in Vienna --Hubertl 09:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:14, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination France, Nancy, Place Stanislas --Berthold Werner 09:24, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:14, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View to Chugunny Bridge in Moscow --Florstein 07:18, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:34, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Silybum marianum --Christian Ferrer 06:11, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:01, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination European larch (Larix decidua) in autumn near Seckau, Styria --Uoaei1 06:09, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 06:15, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Olive tree (Olea europaea) in an orchard near Preveli, Crete --Uoaei1 06:09, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:02, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mountain hike from Homene Dessus to Vens Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) above Vens, Valle d'Aosta.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:52, 16 February 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:00, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain hike from Homene Dessus to Vens Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) above Vens, Valle d'Aosta.
-
- Nomination Mountain hike of Gimillan (1805m.) At Colle Tsa Sètse Cogne Valley (Italy).
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:52, 16 February 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Sharp photo, good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 06:33, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain hike of Gimillan (1805m.) At Colle Tsa Sètse Cogne Valley (Italy).
-
- Nomination Nago, Okinawa, Japan: Kouri Bridge, with 2.200 m the longest bridge on an open road in Japan, connecting Kouri Island and Yagaji Island --Cccefalon 05:21, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Dynamic composition and very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nakijin, Okinawa, Japan: Sugar cane storage of a juice shop at Nakijin Castle. --Cccefalon 05:21, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:24, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tawau, Sabah: SMK Jambatan Putih, a secondary school --Cccefalon 05:21, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 06:17, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Taipei, Taiwan: The Jiaotse Restaurant in 14th avenue. The owner is preparing her famous handmade Jiaozi --Cccefalon 05:21, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:57, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rivers of Sabah, Malaysia: Sungai Bukau near Kg. Bukau, photo taken from the old Bridge which used to be the North Norneo Railway bridge before --Cccefalon 05:21, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:25, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Underbrush at the peninsula on the Mitter Pond (“Mitterteich”), Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tree in the reeds at the peninsula on the Mitter Pond (“Mitterteich”), Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:13, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trees in the underbrush at the peninsula on the Mitter Pond (“Mitterteich”), Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:12, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trees in the underbrush at the peninsula on the Mitter Pond (“Mitterteich”), Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:55, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trees in the underbrush at the peninsula on the Mitter Pond (“Mitterteich”), Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mountain hike from Homene Dessus to Vens Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) above Vens, Valle d'Aosta.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:40, 15 February 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Could you reduce the noise a little bit? I think the picture has a touch of a magenta cast, too. Please check the WB. --Code 06:31, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Done. Noise Reduction + WB. correction.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:55, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Support Much better. Good quality. --Code 06:13, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain hike from Homene Dessus to Vens Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) above Vens, Valle d'Aosta.
-
- Nomination Church San Pedro in Gardelegi. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 16:14, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Good, but both sides leaning in Poco a poco 16:19, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Done I've tried to correct the perspective, however, perhaps the distance is too near. --Basotxerri 19:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
The right crop is now unfortunate, can you improve it )by cropping a piece of the bottom, for example)? Poco a poco 20:46, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Done Sorry, of course, here you are. --Basotxerri 20:55, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, I didn't express myself properly. I mean that the church is cut off on the right (corner of the tiles roof), can you fix that? Poco a poco 17:57, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Comment No, I understand you now, but however I cannot extend the image on the right. Thank you anyway. --Basotxerri 21:09, 16 February 2016 (UTC) - Withdrawn
- Nomination Church San Pedro in Gardelegi. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 16:14, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hyundai HB2.0 parked in Tombo Square, Guaruja, Brazil, Argentina --Ezarate 01:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Decline The car seems very distorted and dark. No good image for me. But let's hear others. -- Spurzem 22:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Oppose type of car is not easily recognizeable (photo not taken from the front), distracting background, dark --Rftblr 19:49, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kõnnu Suursoo bog (by Aleksandr Abrosimov). Kruusamägi 09:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Comment Too much noise reduction, has eaten fine detail. Fixable. --C messier 15:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Caballero1967 21:59, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Kõnnu Suursoo bog (by Aleksandr Abrosimov). Kruusamägi 09:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kuskovo. The Grotto. --Hamerani 18:20, 6 February 2016 (UTC) Not eligible for nomination (no categories) --Cccefalon 17:52, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Second decline because author reverted without adressing the issue. --Cccefalon 19:44, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Now ready for review (author finally added categories) --Cccefalon 22:32, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Comment Dark spot due to dirt on sensor near the right edge a bit above the trees. Should be edited out. --Rftblr 22:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC) - Decline No response after 8 days --Hubertl 19:48, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Kuskovo. The Grotto. --Hamerani 18:20, 6 February 2016 (UTC) Not eligible for nomination (no categories) --Cccefalon 17:52, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kuskovo. The orangerie.1. --Hamerani 18:20, 6 February 2016 (UTC) Not eligible for nomination (no categories) --Cccefalon 17:51, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Second decline because author reverted without adressing the issue. --Cccefalon 19:44, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Now ready for review (author finally added categories) --Cccefalon 22:32, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Comment Horizon needs to be levelled.--Rftblr 22:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC) - Decline No response after 8 days --Hubertl 19:48, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Kuskovo. The orangerie.1. --Hamerani 18:20, 6 February 2016 (UTC) Not eligible for nomination (no categories) --Cccefalon 17:51, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Consensual review edit
File:16-02-14-Railjet-innen-_RR25728.jpg edit
- Nomination Railjet innen, erste Klasse --Ralf Roletschek 15:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 15:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose too noisy --A.Savin 16:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose come guys,this just not --Livioandronico2013 17:31, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Dark areas posterized, noise, lack of DOF, probably some motion blur. -- Smial 13:19, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Hubertl 12:01, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
File:Baden-Baden 10-2015 img08 Merkur tower.jpg edit
- Nomination Baden-Baden: Merkur tower --A.Savin 18:01, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Sorry: Perspective, top crop, bottom crop. --Code 08:04, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I don't get the problem. 1) It is a close shot of a tower from the ground, so perspective issues are intended and you cannot expect all verticals to be straight anyway 2) the antenna is really very long and superfluous, it would make few sense to show it entirely, otherwise we had nothing but sky (+ this antenna) on the complete upper half of the photo. And 3) what's wrong with bottom crop? --A.Savin 13:22, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Well, one can surely discuss about the perspective, but the cut antenna is clearly a no go in my opinion. The bottom crop is too tight IMO, look at the object (cube?) in the foreground which should be visible either completely or not at all. This is not a QI. It would of course be nice if someone else could vote, too. --Code 06:07, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I don't get the problem. 1) It is a close shot of a tower from the ground, so perspective issues are intended and you cannot expect all verticals to be straight anyway 2) the antenna is really very long and superfluous, it would make few sense to show it entirely, otherwise we had nothing but sky (+ this antenna) on the complete upper half of the photo. And 3) what's wrong with bottom crop? --A.Savin 13:22, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose as for code. -- Smial 12:29, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Hubertl 12:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
File:028_2014_08_04_Urlaub_Sulden.jpg edit
- Nomination New Parish Church of St. Gertraud. --F. Riedelio 16:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion
{{o}}Too much noise for a quality image.--Rftblr 18:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I do not see an overabundance of noise, other than the mountains when very zoomed in. Please point to the areas that are too noisy. --Balon Greyjoy 15:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment The whole shadow area of the church exhibits noticeable noise. Some of what at first glance appears to be stains on the facade, is actually horizontal banding noise (horizontal bright stripes above the windows on the apse). For me this is not quality. --Rftblr 23:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment @Rftblr: I can't see much noise on the facade. Can you please add an annotation so I can see what is meant. Thank you. --F. Riedelio 08:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/106488912/028_2014_08_04_Urlaub_Sulden_NOISE.jpg --Rftblr 09:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Note, that I like the composition, but something happend here, since there is clearly more noise than should be achievable with your camera in bright daylight. (Did you shoot in JPG and perform exposure compensation in post-processing?) --Rftblr 10:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Here is a version with midtone noise reduced to an acceptable level: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/106488912/028_2014_08_04_Urlaub_Sulden_DENOISE.jpg The banding noise is still visible though (this version I would not object to, but I would not support it either. Another reviewer should decide).
- Comment Here is a version with midtone noise reduced to an acceptable level: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/106488912/028_2014_08_04_Urlaub_Sulden_DENOISE.jpg The banding noise is still visible though (this version I would not object to, but I would not support it either. Another reviewer should decide).
- Comment Note, that I like the composition, but something happend here, since there is clearly more noise than should be achievable with your camera in bright daylight. (Did you shoot in JPG and perform exposure compensation in post-processing?) --Rftblr 10:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/106488912/028_2014_08_04_Urlaub_Sulden_NOISE.jpg --Rftblr 09:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment @Rftblr: I can't see much noise on the facade. Can you please add an annotation so I can see what is meant. Thank you. --F. Riedelio 08:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment The whole shadow area of the church exhibits noticeable noise. Some of what at first glance appears to be stains on the facade, is actually horizontal banding noise (horizontal bright stripes above the windows on the apse). For me this is not quality. --Rftblr 23:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I do not see an overabundance of noise, other than the mountains when very zoomed in. Please point to the areas that are too noisy. --Balon Greyjoy 15:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Done New developed version (Lightroom V6.4) uploaded. Additional noise decrease in Corel PaintShop Pro X7.
- Comment The photo was made in RAW-format (.cr2), converted in Lightroom to .dng. and exported to .jpg. --F. Riedelio 14:09, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I withdraw my opposition. However I think you overdid the noise reduction on the top half of the aspe. Everything else looks OK now. Still, another reviewer should decide. --Rftblr 14:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment The photo was made in RAW-format (.cr2), converted in Lightroom to .dng. and exported to .jpg. --F. Riedelio 14:09, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice composition, but really too much noise, please look to the grass, sorry --Michielverbeek 23:44, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support I don't even understand what you're talking about. Easily meets QI criteria. Noise is not an issue here (IMO noise is not an issue at all as long as it's not chromatic noise or leads to a loss of details, which is not the case here). --Code 07:59, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support Ok for me --Uoaei1 20:19, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Hubertl 13:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose First version had some surprising noise in midtones and shadows, that could have been somewhat reduced. But the current version lost too much detail, so I'm very unhappy with this rework. -- Smial 13:44, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment What about the version I suggested: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/106488912/028_2014_08_04_Urlaub_Sulden_DENOISE.jpg --Rftblr 15:51, 15 February 2016 (UTC) ?
- Support I am for it! --Caballero1967 21:00, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --Hubertl 21:52, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
File:Museu da inconfidencia.JPG edit
- Nomination: Museum of the Inconfidência, Ouro Preto, Brazil (by Ricardotakamura) --ArionEstar 21:35, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Review
- Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree. The overall quality is very bad. Nearly all details are gone. I don't know what happened in the postprocessing but this looks like upscaled ore somewhat. Hard to say. This cannot be QI in my eyes. --Code 14:01, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
{{o}} CA, noise, posterisation. Sharpening and noise reduction fight against each other. Somewhat too high colour saturation.striked, because without signature --Hubertl 09:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC),br/>- Support I would say that for a 30 second exposure the loss of detail is not too bad, if it were downscaled until the detail loss was imperceptable it would still be a large enough image. It is only when viewing at original (very high) resolution that the flaws become very visible. --Prosthetic Head 13:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Severe CAs, perspective not corrected. At full resolution the quality is not acceptable, but downsized at nearly 6 Mpix, the level of detail is OK. And some overexposure on the walls near the lamps. --C messier 15:13, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Heavily processed (sharpened?), real image quality is not high enough at this resolution. --Shansov.net 02:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Шухрат Саъдиев 13:23, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose nothing to add. --Carschten 10:39, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 15:18, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Several quality issues. --A.Savin 13:34, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Fix chromatic aberrations, please. That's the most glaring issue (eg. look at the windows on a buildings near very right and left side of the frame) --SkywalkerPL 10:31, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support I find it of good quality. --Caballero1967 21:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Hubertl 21:51, 18 February 2016 (UTC)