Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 09 2015

Consensual review

edit

File:Caminho das pedras (cropped).JPG

edit

 

  • Nomination Fernando de Noronha, Rio Grande do Norte state, Brazil (by Ana Lachtermacher). --ArionEstar 19:48, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose not enough sharp and lack of fine details. Sorryu --Ezarate 23:46, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good enough IMO for QI. Please discuss. --C messier 16:28, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good for me too. --Hockei 10:46, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support As C messier. --Milseburg 11:10, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 06:21, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

File:John Lewis Brown with Wife and Daughter by Giovanni Boldini 1890.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination John Lewis Brown with his Wife and Daughter by Giovanni Boldini 1890 --Yelkrokoyade 16:26, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment It is hard to make this kind of photo at museums and galleries a f/2 is not af good choose (but unfortunately stand is generally not allowed. --Villy Fink Isaksen 19:19, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment bad quality regarding to this reproduction --Hubertl 19:21, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment What is the use to close the diaphragm more than f/2 with the AF-S NIKKOR 50 mm f/1.8G to make this kind of picture (no deep of file for this 2D picture)? You can see the test of the lens from DxO to see the qualité at this diaphragm. As I take picture in RAW it's easy to make a version resembling this reproduction but the first one will be nearer from the original in the museum (the colors are not so deep in reality). Do you prefer the 2nd one or an optimised version instead of a picture ressembling the original ? For me it doesn't go in the right sens. --Yelkrokoyade 20:59, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Actually, it´s not so much a question of color than a significant lack of details. It is possible to use the picture from the museum itself, there are no more Copyrights left. It´s free! --Hubertl 05:55, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 06:20, 8 June 2015 (UTC)