Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 12 2016

Consensual review edit

File:20160526_Fotoprojekt_Oesterreichischer_Film_Karin_Lischka_IMG_5678_LR10_by_Stepro.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Karin Lischka, Austrian actress --Stepro 01:54, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good and useful.--ArildV 05:30, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, I disagree: too tight top crop. --Peulle 17:03, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose sorry, but this kind of crop doesn´t work with a half body composition. --Hubertl 06:28, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per above Poco a poco 19:37, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per above-बिप्लब आनन्द 13:23, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Stepro 00:04, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Malabar Gliding Frog Pair.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Female at bottom has fungal infection in the eye --Nireekshit 06:04, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:34, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Needs identification of species. Plus broken coordinates --A.Savin 17:59, 3 June 2016 (UTC) Done now --A.Savin 12:26, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
    •   Comment The species is identified, it's the Malabar gliding frog. But yes, that redlink needs fixing.--Peulle 13:45, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support QI to me, the broken link of the coordinates template is not nice but not a showstopper IMHO Poco a poco 19:40, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Instead of opposing I simply fixed the coordinates. It's a wiki, you know... And the pic is great! --Stepro (talk) 05:46, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Stepro (talk) 00:01, 12 June 2016 (UTC)