Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 02 2015

Consensual review edit

File:2015_Snow_cover_collapsed.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Collapsed snow cover over a beck in thaw --Kreuzschnabel 10:39, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Dnalor 01 10:43, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry but the only thing in focus is the snow, the rest is blurred --Σπάρτακος 13:28, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
    •   Comment Precisely this was my intention. See file name. --Kreuzschnabel 19:46, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support The photo is doing exactly what a photographer wants to get, when he uses f/4,5 - a limited DoF. Nothing to complain here for me. --Cccefalon 12:54, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support. Gute Komposition. Der Schnee ist es wohl, worum es in diesem Bild geht. -- Spurzem 13:09, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:47, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --C messier 15:19, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Αστεροσκοπείο Αθηνών 6845.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Athens Observatory as seen from Pnyx. --C messier 23:03, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion   Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. Nice image, but IMO sharpness not the best and CAs. --XRay 08:29, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
    Uploaded a sharpened version. XRay can you leave a note for the CAs? --C messier 16:38, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
      Comment I added a note.--XRay 16:52, 24 February 2015 (UTC)  Done --C messier 17:59, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support--Σπάρτακος 13:19, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support OK now.--XRay 12:11, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Nice! and good quality --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:35, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --C messier 15:21, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Platalea leucorodia, Israel.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Platalea leucorodia in Hula Valley, Israel. --מינוזיג 10:41, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Insufficient quality. hazy, unsharp, int the left part, the beak of the bird is disturbing it hides the animal's feet.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:06, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   NeutralThe bird is sharp. This species is famous for its beak, not the feet (which are not trully hidden). I will support when the green halo over the back of the bird is removed and IMHO is a bit underexposed. --C messier 22:36, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
    •   Oppose not done and a bit too small DOF. --C messier 15:14, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Weak oppose Genereally nice but poor framing (left half of frame is entirely uninteresting, not even a nice background for compositional aspects – cropping would take the pic close to the lower pixelage limit) and too shallow DoF. The legs appear sharper than the beak, the tip of which is definitely blurred. --Kreuzschnabel 08:32, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --C messier 14:04, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Pörtschach Winklern Gaisrückenstrasse 69 Wohnhaus 07022014 9589.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Residential building on Gaisrueckenstrasse #69 at Winklern, Poertschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 17:02, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion The perspective should be enhanced: The fence on the right side is leaning in too much. --Cccefalon 00:43, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
      Not done Mattbuck 22:18, 17 February 2015 (UTC)   Done Sorry it took so much time, but I was busy with other things. Reworked version uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 04:37, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
    New version uploaded. please review. --Hubertl 12:42, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Nice! and good quality --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:21, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --Hubertl 17:42, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  • @Johann Jaritz: - could you please perform a crop at the top? There's a lot of empty sky. Mattbuck 22:13, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Done Thanks for your assessment. Reworked version uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 02:53, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --C messier 15:22, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Haltern_am_See,_Hullern,_Kriegerehrenmal_--_2014_--_3251.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination War memorial in Hullern, Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:27, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Nice detail on the war memorial --Daniel Case 07:00, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Sorry, but the focus is a bit too close I think (pavement not memorial), and the metal post spoils the composition. --Mattbuck 22:18, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support The pole is there and little can be done about that. Good quality. Jakec 00:32, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
    Reality can prevent images being QI - that's part of composition. Mattbuck 22:06, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Matt – pavement appearing sharper than the main subject is distracting. Not the best lighting too. --Kreuzschnabel 07:29, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Lacks detail at the main subject. --MB-one 17:56, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --C messier 15:23, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Wooden bridge over Little Fishing Creek.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination: Wooden bridge over Little Fishing Creek.JPG. Jakec 03:30, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Please fix CA in the snow at the top. Mattbuck 23:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Review

  Not done --Mattbuck 21:45, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

  •   Comment I removed what I could. Sorry for the delay; I've been busy lately. Jakec 16:10, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support for me QI now.--Hubertl 09:03, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Hubertl 09:01, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Railroad_Museum_of_Pennsylvania_Red_Boxcar.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination: Red Boxcar --Ram-Man 04:11, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Review
  •   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:35, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree: Magenta CA on the steering wheel, fringing of green/cyan type at the roof ridge. --Cccefalon 08:27, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose   Abstain &   Done Major CA. --DXR 16:40, 17 February 2015 (UTC) I fixed it. It's really not that hard. You could basically dump your images into some improvement site before nominating instead of debating the reasonableness of CA correction. --DXR 05:53, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
    • They don't even pass the minimum guideline of distracting. The magenta fringing blends with the red paint. You have to know exactly what you are looking for. The cyan fringing is visible, but not by much, and it's not glaring. Ram-Man 17:56, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  • The CA should be corrected, though if the train has a steering wheel as Cccefalon suggests, I for one am extremely worried! Mattbuck 21:56, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
    • Haha, yes, it probably is part of a car brake. Railway equipment is not my field of experience. --Cccefalon 23:08, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  •   Done So I applied a basic CA correction in Photoshop. It seems to have minimized the CAs in the top left while increasing them in the right side as well as fuzzing out the fine detail in the picture. Personally, I like the original better because it is sharper. But let's get some feedback so I can get an idea what is expected, although since it looks worse, I may revert and just withdraw the nomination. Ram-Man 02:32, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
    • I tried the same in GIMP to find the CA is not symmetrical. Did you crop the image before uploading? CA reduction routines expect CA to be symmetric to the center. --Kreuzschnabel 19:19, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Hubertl 13:05, 26 February 2015 (UTC)