Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 11 2015

Consensual review edit

File:Vilnius Cathedral Exterior Night, Vilnius, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Vilnius Cathedral at night. Vilnius, Lithuania. (by Diliff) --Pofka 11:07, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. (It's looks a little bit oversaturated.) --XRay 11:46, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   OpposeNo QI for me. The tower is very distorted and the blue of the sky seems to be not the real one. -- Spurzem 14:00, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The tower is too much distorted --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 11:05, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Weak oppose Per PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ --Livioandronico2013 20:42, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined Code 06:15, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

File:2014-12-18_Facade_details_at_Neue_Burg,_Vienna_-hu-_6253.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Facade details of the neue Burg, Vienna --Hubertl 08:22, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:38, 04 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Comment I disagree Too dark, I'll support if fixed --Moroder 12:53, 4 March 2015 (UTC) *   Done Not too much, otherwise I would lose textures, especially in the face, it was the 18th of December, late afternoon.. But thx for your review, Wolfgang! --Hubertl 15:30, 4 March 2015 (UTC) @Moroder:  ? --Hubertl 10:27, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
  • barely   Support I believe it's still dark --Moroder 17:04, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support --Livioandronico2013 19:44, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --C messier 08:38, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Santiagobernabeupanoramav5.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Santiago Bernabéu Stadium.--لا روسا 22:32, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --El Grafo 09:04, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I don't like the crops, specially that of the field. --Kadellar 17:48, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
  • The photo itself has a good quality, there is no way to have the field completely by a person, but via photo aerial.--لا روسا 05:01, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - Overexposure, too tight a crop. Mattbuck 20:52, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined Code 06:08, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

File:20140312_Cologne_ESC_Germany_0547.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination 'Eurovision Song Contest 2014 - Unser Song für Dänemark': 'Unheilig'. By User:MarkusFelix --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 03:06, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose - Camera tilted (on purpose, obviously, but it doesn't work for me), drumset cut in half, snowflake (?) right in front of the singer's eye. --El Grafo 17:05, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support - Good quality. --Kadellar 17:08, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose - Good technical quality in most aspects, but the composition fails it. Mattbuck 20:42, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:52, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined Code 06:03, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Head of Publius Aelius Traianus Hadrianus in Museo Nazionale Romano.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Head of Hadrian --Livioandronico2013 09:29, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion   OpposeInsufficient description, bad categorization, again and always. Sorry.--Jebulon 11:03, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
      Done as always Jebulon --Livioandronico2013 13:44, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
    Bad categorization and description shouldn´t be a reason for declining. --Hubertl 13:47, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
    I was stuck without warning, hello to all  

. --LivioAndronico 14:11, 3 March 2015 (UTC Hubertl What is a QI ? See point 3 in Images requirements of QIC guidelines, thanks.--Jebulon 22:33, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

  •   Support Description could be better but it is enough for me. I see no reason to decline. -- Spurzem 23:13, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support as Spurzem --Hubertl 10:29, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:53, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted Code 06:02, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Telšiai Cathedral Exterior, Telšiai, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Telšiai Cathedral in Telšiai, Lithuania. (by Diliff) --Pofka 11:41, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion   Comment Very good detail as usual but the distortion from straightening the verticals is a bit too much for me. Some posterization in the clouds right of the tower. Let’s hear some more opinions. --Kreuzschnabel 09:05, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
  • weak   Oppose It's a borderline case for me distortion-wise – I've seen much, much worse. Clouds look OK to me. I'm not entirely convinced that the "natural framing" (branches) at the left side really work in this case. I'd really like to hear other opinions as well. --El Grafo (talk) 15:18, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support Maybe less perspective correction would look more natural, but good quality. --Kadellar 17:02, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support per Kadellar. Detail is beautiful. Mattbuck 20:36, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Support good quality --Hubertl 21:09, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted Code 05:59, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

File:ČSD Class (IMG 8750).JPG edit

 

  • Nomination A ČSD Class 451 (ČSD Class 451 045/046) departs from Zábřeh na Moravě station (Czech Republic). --Daniel Holý CZ 14:33, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline QI -- Spurzem 15:33, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
      Question Maybe I am making a fool of myself but is this a Wikimedian’s work? --Kreuzschnabel 08:29, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
      Oppose I am also in doubts. For me, it looks that the nominating user Daniel Holý CZ is uploading the work of some people with OTRS. However, this is not entitling the photos to participate in QIC. If this turns out to be the case, then there are some QI that have to be delisted. Example: The photo's author is Karel Furiš, but this [1] photos author is Viktor Zerzán. --Cccefalon 08:40, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  Oppose Nice picture and interesting object, but perspective correction is needed --Shansov.net 21:26, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined Code 05:58, 10 March 2015 (UTC)