Open main menu

User talk:Pierre André Leclercq

(Redirected from User talk:PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ)
 My main page 
My main page
 Discuss 
Discuss
 Themes 
Themes
 Visited Countries 
Visited Countries
 Campaigns Wikimedia 
Campaigns Wikimedia
 
Welcome on my wikimedia commons' page,
Discussions


Contents

DiscussionsEdit

Happy holidays! 2018! ;)Edit

Christmas decorations 2017 G1.jpg Wreath icon.png * Happy Holidays 2018, Pierre André Leclercq! *
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 25 December 2017 (UTC)   

Your signatureEdit

Your signature has a space between the "User" and ":Pierre André Leclercq". This makes it broken and the tool used to count votes fails. For example, see this diff. Could you fix it please? -- Colin (talk) 17:56, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Sorry I wasn't clear. I had already fixed the voting pages. I was asking you to fix your signature (in Preferences) -- Colin (talk) 18:37, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi Colin, I think I repaired the broken link. The result tables now display correctly. With my all apologies. Best regards. --Pierre André (talk) 18:40, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Pierre, please look at the wikitext of your signature. "User :Pierre André Leclercq". There is a space in it before the ":". The link seems to still work but it breaks the Photo Challenge voting tool. Can you have a look at your preferences and try to find the space. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 20:23, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi Colin, OK! I deleted the space that remained before ":". I hope that my error repaired, no longer affects "Photo Challenge voting tool". Thank you, best regards. --Pierre André (talk) 21:22, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Low resolution ?Edit

Bonjour Pierre-André,
Je ne comprends pas pourquoi tu as mis ces 4 images dans Category:Low-resolution images from Wiki Loves Earth 2018 in France ?
Le produit de leurs dimensions (1920 × 1080) donne 2073600 qui est supérieur au 2000000 requis.
Est-ce que j'ai raté quelque chose ? Pmau (talk) 10:08, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour Pmau
Mea culpa! C'est une erreur de ma part que je m'empresse de corriger. Je me suis arrêté à leur taille de - 1Mo sans avoir penser faire le calcul du produit de leurs dimensions (1920 × 1080). Cordialement --Pierre André (talk) 10:25, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Ok, Merci. Pmau (talk) 10:27, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Moscou Park Kultury-Koltsevaya.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Moscou Park Kultury-Koltsevaya.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Souzdal Église Saint-Nicolas (Glotovo).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Souzdal Église Saint-Nicolas (Glotovo).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Pavlosk Monument Ermina.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pavlosk Monument Ermina.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Iaroslavl Cathédrale de la Dormition (6).JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Icons of Saint Pantaleon in the cathedral of the Dormition, Yaroslavl, Russia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
SPB Ermitage - Madonna and Child with Saints (Antonio Da Firenze).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Antonio da Firenze Madonna and Child with Saints. Ermitage Saint-Pétersbourg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Moscou.- St. Basil's Cathedral intérieur (en2018) (2).JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nicolas-le-Thaumaturge Cathedral Saint-Basile-the-Blessed. Moscow.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

VIEdit

Bonjour, Je vote volontiers si les images ont au moins une utilisation, ceci est purement personnel ce n'est pas une règle de VI. Les tableaux par convention ne sont pas présenté avec un cadre sauf si celui ci à un intérêt historique (çà peu arriver), ton dernier tableau a une zone de reflet qui masque une partie de l'oeuvre. Ce n'est pas possible de l'améliorer. Il faut souvent prendre deux images que l'on assemble pour avoir un tableau sans reflet, fait quelques essais on y arrive. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour, Archaeodontosaurus Merci pour ces informations. En ce qui concerne mon dernier versement "Murillo, Rest on the Flight into Egypte", j'ai tenté de corriger la zone de reflet, en reprenant une portion d' images sans reflet. Cordialement. --Pierre André (talk) 08:15, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kingston sohal tower (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Canadian Horseshoe Falls (en 2017) (7).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kingston Ontario Canada Island -Queen (5).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Doors of Saint Isaac's Cathedral Saint Petersburg, Russia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Thousand Islands.- Zavikon Island.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Flight into Egypt by Bartolomé Esteban Murillo. Musée de l'Ermitage, Saint Petersburg .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Catherine Park, Saint-Pétersbourg, Russie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Moscou Prospekt Mira-Koltsevaya (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Niagara Falls Rainbow Bridge en2017 (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kingston Ontario Canada Bateau Mouche.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ottawa Peace Tower (l'horloge).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Parc marin du Saguenay–Saint-Laurent (11).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saint Petersbourg Musée littéraire Anna Akhmatova bis (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Moscou Statue de Pierre le Grand.JPGEdit

 
File:Moscou Statue de Pierre le Grand.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

- [Tycho] talk 21:37, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Quebec-city Corridor du Littoral (5).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Angkor Wat.- Battle of Devas and Asuras (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ile de Bréhat (Enez Vriad) Buildings (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Canadian Horseshoe Falls (en 2017) (8).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ottawa Byward Market Hall (12).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Iaroslavl le Pont du trans-sibérien sur la Volga (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Louvre-Lens Autel.- Sacrifice compitalice (cap855).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Painting of Saint Anthony of Padua in France Saint Maurice church, Lille .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Charles de Borome Saint Maurice church, Lille .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Butchers' House Besse-et-Saint-Anastaise, Puy-de-Dôme (France).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Quebec-City Corridor du Littoral (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Quebec-city Corridor du Littoral (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Quebec-city Corridor du Littoral (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

VI candidate muddleEdit

Hi Pierre, I corrected the name of an entry of yours in the VI candidates list. The entry I removed is corrupt, it points to the wrong image for its name. You can see the problem if you look at the "File usage on commons section" of this image - it appears in two different candidate files. I hope you understand and agree with my actions. :) -- DeFacto (talk). 17:36, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi DeFacto, You're right, it's allright. Thank you for your action.--Pierre André (talk) 20:50, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Painting of Saint Joseph Saint Maurice church, Lille .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ta Reach Angkor Wat Temple. Cambodia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Problème en VIEdit

Ton Cabe de San Francisco est bloqué en VI, veux-tu que je ferme manuellement cette promotion?--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour Archaeodontosaurus je ne sais pas à quoi cela est du. Effectivement, il vaut mieux que tu fermes cette cette promotion. Bonne journée. Cordialement--Pierre André (talk) 07:59, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Les causes restent mystérieuses, voilà c'est réparé. Bonne journée. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:16, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kudurru Detail of Babylon Cassita Louvre-Lens museum..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hathoric capitals Louvre-Lens museum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bust of Saint Maurice Lille.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bust of Saint Peter. Saint Maurice church, Lille.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wracks Oven, Porspoder in France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Virgin Hodegetria (Rostov Kremlin), (Russie) Eastern view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ile de Bréhat (Enez Vriad) Buildings (13).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Villeneuve d'Ascq Asnapio Age de Bronze Eté2018 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Inuksuit in Quebec Saint-Félicien Zoo. .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ile de Bréhat Croix de Maudez.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ile de Bréhat (Enez Vriad) Buildings (7).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Camp of Boulogne-sur-Mer North view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Musée Louvre-Lens Fragment du palais de Darius1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pania Of The Reef Statue North view, Napier (N.Z.).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nielles-les-Blequin la chapelle Notre-Dame du Mont (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Beaune.- les vignobles de la côte de Beaune (26).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hemeroplanes triptolemus MHNT CUT 2010 0 162 Nuevo Xcán Quintana Roo Mexico male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy water dispenser in Church of the Immaculate Conception Wimereux..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vougeot WLM2016 Château du Clos de Vougeot (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nuits Saint Georges, Clos de Vougeot Domaine Anne Gros (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Clos de Vougeot Chateau de la Tour (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coat of arms of Fontenay abbey Marmagne, Côte-d'Or.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stone carving: "Hunt of St Hubert" basilica Sainte-Marie-Madeleine. Vézelay.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Beaune.- les vignobles de la côte de Beaune (25).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vaudringhem sur le GR 121B (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chaillé les Marais. Église Sainte-Marie-Madeleine (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Jard sur Mer, Le moulin de la Conchette (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Jard sur Mer.- la plage (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dinan le Vieux pont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dinan le Vieux pont sur la Rance (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Beaune.- les vignobles de la côte de Beaune (28).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Beaune.- les vignobles de la côte de Beaune (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nuits-Saint-Georges WLM2016 Château d'Entre-Deux-Monts (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nielles-les-Blequin la mairie (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle Sainte-Catherine de Dinan Facade from the north of the former Dominican Convent. .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

File:Châteauneuf WLM2016 le château (Côte-d'Or) (3).jpgEdit

Bonjour, J'ai essayé d'améliorer un peu l'image. Reverte si ça ne va pas. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:50, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour Yann   Thank you C'est sympathique de votre part, l'amélioration est parfaite; Cordialement.--Pierre André (talk) 15:46, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hornaing la centrale thermique en2018 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Beaune.- les vignobles de la côte de Beaune (21).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Beaune.- les vignobles de la côte de Beaune (32).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Reliefs in Gutmanis Cave East view, Sigulda (Latvia).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sculptures of Euripides in Louvre-Lens Museum (2018).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nielles-les-Blequin la chapelle Notre-Dame du Mont (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of the Château de Châteauneuf (Côte-d'Or), seen from W.- Côte-d'Or.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saint-Malo Ships at berth in 2017 (25).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saint-Malo les remparts de la cité (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saint-Malo Ships at berth in 2017 (29).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Beaune.- les vignobles de la côte de Beaune (29).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chambord Eté2016 exposition de Calèches au château (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chambord Eté2016 exposition de Calèches au château (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Notre-Dame de la Grand'Porte Seen from East, ramparts of the city of Saint-Malo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chambord Eté2016 exposition de Calèches au château (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Souzdal.-Horse-drawn carriages (1).JPGEdit

If the file File:Souzdal.-Horse-drawn carriages (1).JPG could be used in a project then it would be alright for a VI I feel. Generally if a file is in use then it can be promoted easier then those that are not in use. The scope may need a bit of refinement once it is in use but that should be it. I can't tell you what I think a better scope would be right now because I don't know where it would be best used but if it was used at all it then the scope could be figured it out from there. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 10:33, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi Sixflashphoto, Thank you for this information. I keep the scope thus modified, wishing that it will be understood from there. Best regards.--Pierre André (talk) 10:46, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! La Guittiere l'Ile Aux Huitres (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! L'Île d'Olonne (5).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! L'Île d'Olonne (7).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Jard sur Mer.- la plage (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Memorial of the Legion of Honor Seen from South, Wimereux.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saint-Vincent Circuit pédestre de La Ragnette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saint-Vincent sur Jard,Plage Clemenceau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saint-Vincent sur Jard, Plage de la Ragnette (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hornaing, city limit en 2018.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pump in the village of Chaillé-les-Marais, Vendée.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! La cathédrale Saint-Pierre de Maillezais (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saint-Malo Ships at berth in 2017 (11).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saint-Malo la Tour Bidouane.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saint-Malo Le Fort-National (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! L'Île d'Olonne (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Zabriskies Point panoramique2016.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zabriskies Point panoramique2016.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Puy du Fou.- La Cité Médiévale (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Le sentier du Blanc Nez .- Eté2016 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

May I use your phoyograph of a Strowger switch?Edit

May I please use this image in a book that I am putting together on http://roger-wood.com

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strowger_switch#/media/File:T%C3%A9l%C3%A9graphie,_Systeme_Strowger.jpg

I will make sure the link is included and the image is attributed to Pierre Andre Leclercq.

best regards Roger —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 174.215.10.11 (talk) 07:48, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Roger, I am happy to know that this image will be useful in the book you are collecting on your site http://roger-wood.com. I am indeed, the author of this photo taken in the museum of telecommuications of Marcq-en-Baroeul. Best regard. --Pierre André (talk) 08:16, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hohenschwangau village (Baviara) (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Le sentier du Blanc Nez .- Eté2016 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schloss Hohenschwangau (Baviara 2016) (9).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel of Our Lady of the Coast Penvins, France (view N)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Shooting RAWEdit

Bonjour Pierre André, I've seen that you struggled quite a lot when improving your image. If you take photographing seriously and I think so as your camera isn't precisely a point-and-shoot camera, I can only recommend you that you shoot RAW and prepare your images in a descent program (well GIMP isn't bad but something like Lightroom is much easier). When I started here, I didn't care about the preparation/post processing but after some tips of the people at QIC, I got better and better. Best regards, --Basotxerri (talk) 18:32, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

  • Hi, Basotxerri, indeed I am trying to improve my images to present them in QIC. I'm really passionate about digital photography, and I have a Sony Cybershoot and a second Sony NEX-F3 that allows the RAW format. I rarely use this format that I can unpack with the RawTherapee 5.4 software installed on my PC. I will follow your advice in the future with the hope of improving my QIC. Thank you for this information. Best regards, --Pierre André (talk) 21:06, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Yours sincerely, Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:43, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Laos Plateau des Bolovens Ban Lao Ngam (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Laos Plateau des Bolovens Ban Lao Ngam (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Laos Plateau des Bolovens Ban Lao Ngam (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Laos Plateau des Bolovens Ban Lao Ngam (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Laos Plateau des Bolovens Ban Lao Ngam (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wurztburg Festung Marienberg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tonle Sap Biosphere Reserve (28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Château de Linderhof (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schloss Hohenschwangau (Baviara 2016) (10).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nieuwkerke Eglise Onze-Lieve-Vrouwkerk (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

WLM 2018 : Catégorisation de la série sur le château de Valbelle d'AstroscapeEdit

Bonsoir Pierre-André,

En vérifiant les photos de wiki loves monuments, j'ai vu que tu avais déplacé les photos du château de Valbelle prises par @Astroscape: (comme celle ci ) dans la catégorie Category:Images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in France − early. Ces photos (fort réussies au demeurant) ont été envoyées le 2 septembre et rentrent donc bien dans le concours donc, si tu n'y vois pas d'objections, je vais les retirer de cette catégorie.

Cordialement, Jvillafruela (talk) 18:49, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

@Jvillafruela: Bonsoir, en fait ayant fait un test sur une dizaine de photos j'avais quelques doutes. J'ai donc posé la question via ma page de discussion aux organisateurs. Il s'agit d'une confusion, de ma part, entre la date d'importation et la date de la prise de vue. Tu as donc bien fait, de procéder à la correction, avant moi. Merci cordialement, --Pierre André (talk) 21:27, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

WLM not earlyEdit

Salut, pourquoi tu as changé la categorie ici, ici et ici pour Category:Images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in France − early? Ils ont téléchargé aujourd'hui, donc pas trop tot... Cordialement, Tournasol7 (talk) 19:52, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

@Tournasol7: Bonsoir, en fait ayant fait un test sur une dizaine de photos j'avais quelques doutes. J'ai donc posé la question, via ma page de discussion aux organisateurs. Il s'agit d'une confusion, de ma part, entre la date d'importation et la date de la prise de vue. J'ai procédé aux corrections en les validant dans la catégorie Images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in France. Merci pour ton message cordialement, --Pierre André (talk) 21:36, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
Ok, merci pour ta reponse. Bonne soiree! Tournasol7 (talk) 22:56, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paris lePalais de la Cité (la Conciergerie) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paris le Louvre au Pont-Royal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

WLM Obviously ineligibleEdit

Bonjour,

Je vois que tu viens de déplacer ce matin certaines photos dans Category:Obviously ineligible submissions for Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in France, notamment des photos de Chambord et Cheverny. Pourtant ces photos me semble parfaitement admissibles, quel est le problème ?

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 08:33, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour, sauf erreur, il semble que la taille de ces photos, n'a pas le minimum requis. Leur format est inférieur à 1600x1200 selon l'article 5.3 du règlement. Cordialement, Pierre André
Ah oui, bien sûr, c'est moi qui suis fatigué ;) Merci de ta vigilance. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 09:03, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Bonsoir, ces photos du Château de Chaumont sur Loire et de Notre-Dame me semblent admissibles non ? Jvillafruela (talk) 18:21, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Bonsoir, @Jvillafruela:, sauf erreur de ma part, ces photos ne répondent pas aux points du règlement à vérifier:
  • présence obligatoire du modèle Mérimée avec un identifiant valide ... (les modèles avec un identifiant erronée sont automatiquement placé dans Category:Mérimée with incorrect ID)
  • présence, facultative, d'une catégorie, dans l'idéal la plus précise possible, soit la catégorie sur le monument lui-même - voire même une sous-catégorie sur un élément du monument - soit au minimum la commune où se trouve le monument
Pour info, à titre pédagogique, j'ai à plusieurs reprises corrigé de nombreux fichiers en y rajoutant les descriptions, l'identifiant de la base Mérimée, la géolocalisation et j'ai précisé, pour certains d'entre eux, la catégorie de la ville dans laquelle ils avaient été pris, qui n'était pas donnée.
A mon sens point trop n'en faut, surtout quand le photographe persiste à téléverser des fichiers mal libellés. CF l'historique de ce fichier   que j'ai validé après y avoir apporté de nombreux ajouts. Cordialement, --Pierre André (talk) 20:58, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Bonsoir Pierre André, je corrige également(quand c'est possible) les fichiers incomplets. Pour l'exemple que tu donnes je ne pense pas qu' Iris Chérot ait fait preuve de mauvaise volonté car c'est une nouvelle contributrice et elle a envoyé ses 5 photos en une seule fois. Je me permets donc de repêcher sa photo tout en attirant son attention sur les règles à suivre. Bonne soirée Jvillafruela (talk) 18:53, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Bonjour @Jvillafruela: effectivement tu as bien fait de repêcher Iris Chérot, nouvelle contributrice. En aucun cas j'ai voulu "casser" son moral, mais l'inciter à corriger ses oublis, tout en sachant que j' aurais revu les fichiers concernés. Bonne journée, cordialement.--Pierre André (talk) 08:48, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Bonjour Pierre André Leclercq, je ne comprends pas pourquoi la photographie File:Manège journées du patrimoine 70011.jpg est versée dans cette catégorie inéligible ? Merci pour l'attention que tu prête à ce concours. Garitan (talk) 13:48, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Bonjour @Garitan: je l'ai versée dans cette catégorie, parce que tout comme cette image   l'accent porte trop sur les personnes et l'exposition qui se tient dans l'édifice. Ceci dit je ne suis pas le seul vérificateur, ta photo peut être repêchée par un autre contrôleur, et l'un des membres du jury (dont je ne fais pas partie), qui en ultime recours décidera. Attention également, de bien veiller au droit l'image, des personnes qui figurent sur les images transmises. Bonne continuation dans ce concours 2018, bien cordialement à toi. --Pierre André (talk) 14:03, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Merci Pierre André Leclercq, je n'avais pas du tout compris que ce classement était un acte personnel du vérificateur et qu'il ne présageait en rien du classement du concours et amènerait d'autres vérifications. Pour ce qui est de l'équilibre entre la, ou les parties classées et le contexte, les participants...n'est pas cité dans les règles du concours. A + Garitan (talk) 14:20, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments ti aspetta, con centinaia di nuovi comuni fotografabiliEdit

 
Concorso Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2018 (English version)

Gentile Pierre André Leclercq, ti ringraziamo ancora una volta per la tua passata partecipazione a Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM). Il più grande concorso fotografico del mondo si svolge anche questo settembre per documentare e promuovere il patrimonio culturale italiano, con una licenza copyright libera.

Quest'anno è doppiamente facile partecipare: gli oggetti fotografabili coprono quasi 1000 comuni in più, grazie all'adesione di centinaia di nuovi enti fra cui Roma, e alla possibilità di fotografare circa 2000 alberi monumentali. Controlla le liste di monumenti fotografabili! Carica tutte le foto che hai e magari organizza una visita presso i monumenti che ancora non hanno una foto.

Quest'oggi il Parlamento europeo ha respinto la proposta di estendere la libertà di panorama. E allora scattiamo e pubblichiamo tutte le foto che possiamo, almeno per questi monumenti per cui ci è legalmente consentito!

Grazie, Nemo 16:09, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Gentile @Nemo:, devo andare in Italia (Milano) per alcuni giorni prima della chiusura della competizione. Pertanto userò la lista dei monumenti mancanti, che scaricherò volentieri. Cordiali saluti.--Pierre André (talk) 16:43, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Aire-sur-la-Lys le bailliage bis2018 (2).jpgEdit

Copyright status: File:Aire-sur-la-Lys le bailliage bis2018 (2).jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Aire-sur-la-Lys le bailliage bis2018 (2).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:44, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Magog the Ogre:   Thank you thank you for your comment, I specified the license forgotten. Regards.--Pierre André (talk) 13:17, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

HiEdit

Hallo Pierre, as an paddler on lake Chiemsee i can identify some locations there. I corrected description on your picture. Grüße vom Chiemsee --DaxBichler (talk) 13:44, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Hallo @DaxBichler:   Thank you for correcting the description on my photos of Chiemsee, as well as their geolocation. Sincerely from Northern France.--Pierre André (talk) 14:13, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Pierre André Leclercq".