Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 18 2015

Consensual review edit

File:Hadrian's Arch0112.JPG edit

 

  • Nomination Hadrian's Arch, Jerash, Jordan.--لا روسا 16:38, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline   SupportGood quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:45, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   OpposeSorry, not a QI to me, too tight crop and perspective issues --Poco a poco 19:39, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose ...and not sharp enough. --Berthold Werner 16:36, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Severe detail loss due to NR --Kreuzschnabel 06:05, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Framing too tight and and perspective issues.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:27, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --C messier 15:49, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

File:The Temple of Artemis, Jerash (3).JPG edit

 

  • Nomination The Temple of Artemis, Jerash.--لا روسا 04:31, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline   SupportGood quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:46, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
      Oppose Jpeg artifacts (visible even from the preview), black halos, perspective not done. --C messier 18:01, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per C messier.--Jebulon 20:12, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Strong oppose Very poor quality. Smear through noise reduction, then hopelessly oversharpened to save the detail. --Kreuzschnabel 06:08, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --C messier 15:49, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Asota caricae 05333.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Asota caricae --Vengolis 17:09, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline the background is very disturbing. it spoil the photo.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:38, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
    Apart from maybe an issue with WB (it is too blue), I don't really see any other problem. We should discuss it. --C messier 20:39, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
      Oppose Not as sharp as the other image. Why ask to promote this one? --Charlesjsharp 12:43, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
    *:   Comment Blue Color is because of the Ultramarine used in the wall painting. CFL may be another reason :) --Vengolis (talk) 17:27, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
  •   Oppose --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:34, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --C messier 15:42, 17 March 2015 (UTC)