Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 25 2017

Consensual review edit

File:2017-02-24_Sandra_Robatscher_by_Sandro_Halank–3.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Sandra Robatscher (Platz 2 beim Nationencup-Rennen der Frauen in Altenberg 2017) --Sandro Halank 10:40, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose That top crop is too tight for my liking. --Peulle 13:35, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support I disagree and ask for discussion. For me it is QI. -- Spurzem 22:04, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support I think this is a good photo, and especially fun with the snowflakes in the air. I don't have a problem with part of the hat being cropped. -- Ikan Kekek 05:48, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Per Ikan. Daniel Case 00:48, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --A.Savin 01:17, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Zattere_Fondamenta_Zattere_allo_Spirito_Santo_incurabili_Venezia.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Fondamenta Zattere allo Spirito Santo in Venice. --Moroder 17:04, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Insufficient quality: sorry, the buildings on the left look blurry. --Peulle 20:57, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment You are right, on the left it is slightly blurred at full picture size. I look for the opinion of other reviewers. Maybe someone of the reviewers understands how this blur on the edge can happen despite the very expensive Nikon lens. It's not a matter of focusing since the rest of the picture is well focused at a distance of several meters from the camera. I believe the blur on the left is irrelevant and I believe this picture is QI according to QIC guidelines. Cheers --Moroder 22:50, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Declined   --A.Savin 01:17, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Danube_near_Brza_Palanka_(Брза_Паланка)_02.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Danube river near Brza Palanka (Брза Паланка), Serbia --Pudelek 20:17, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Too unsharp in background --Daniel Case 06:07, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Sharp enough for a QI IMO --Ermell 20:23, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Most of the image is borderline quality for me, but I see artifacts (see note) and that takes my total down to an oppose.--Peulle 08:24, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
    •   Comment I tried hard to find the artefacts but didn´t succeed.--Ermell 13:43, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Did you see the notation? On the lamp post. Weak but visible to me at 100%.--Peulle 13:54, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  QuestionYou don´t mean the corner of that house behind the lamp?--Ermell 22:27, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
No, I mean the actual curve of the metal on the lamp post. Am I the only one who thinks that looks a bit jaggedy?--Peulle 23:14, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Artefakts are usually visible in the whole of the picture and not just in one place IMO--Ermell 07:27, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --A.Savin 01:16, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Danube_near_Brza_Palanka_(Брза_Паланка)_04.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Danube river near Brza Palanka (Брза Паланка), Serbia --Pudelek 20:17, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   OpposeColors seem unnaturally subdued --Daniel Case 06:07, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   SupportNothing unusal with the colors for me. --Ermell 20:22, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support - The colors seem acceptable. It was a hazy day. -- Ikan Kekek 02:53, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support Looking at the foreground, I don't see any major colour problems either.--Peulle 08:21, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Perhaps I am just used to more saturated, warmer colors for a scene like that. Daniel Case 04:47, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Perhaps you should take a trip to the Balkans? :D--Peulle 07:39, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Maybe. It's been a while since I was there. But a fair amount of other photos from there don't seem to go with such subdued color. Daniel Case 00:49, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --A.Savin 01:15, 25 March 2017 (UTC)