Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 08 2016

Consensual review

edit

File:20160502_Zamek_Książ_6244.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Książ Castle in Wałbrzych --Jakubhal 17:50, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Could be a wow motif, but insufficient sharpness, sorry --A.Savin 00:36, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
  •   SupportPerhaps not optimal but sharp enough for QI. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 20:50, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Acceptable IMO.--Jebulon 09:05, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The sharpness isn't great, but could still be acceptable; however, there are also jpeg artefacts in several places. In total that means it's not QI, IMO --Peulle 13:58, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 18:11, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 21:57, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

File:16-05-03-Letisko_Milana_Rastislava_Štefánika-RalfR-DSCF7954.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination "Slovenska Republika" Tu-154 OM-BYR --Ralf Roletschek 19:51, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality -- Spurzem 21:52, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Not with all the dust spots --A.Savin 00:38, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support OK now. --A.Savin 20:01, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Good enough for QI. --Peulle 11:37, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 15:27, 7 May 2016 (UTC)