Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 11 2016

Consensual review edit

File:Arnhem, straatzicht Rijnstraat voor Giro d'Italia positie2 foto6 2016-04-17 17.55.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Arnhem-NL, street view de Rijnstraat decorated for Giro d'Italia --Michielverbeek 20:47, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Insufficient quality. Inappropriate color balance. --Moheen Reeyad 17:46, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Reasonable colors. --C messier 12:36, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
    •   Comment I have reduced constrast a bit --Michielverbeek 19:43, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Nothing to complain about colours. Moheen, can you please elaborate, what is wrong with the colour? Do you assess from a calibrated monitor or from laptop? --Cccefalon 07:12, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ralf Roletschek 20:41, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 06:08, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

File:2016-04-26_17-16-36_cadenas-amour-pont-des-arts.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Love padlocks on the pont des Arts, Paris. --ComputerHotline 15:37, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Insufficient quality. Unsharp lighting. --Moheen Reeyad 17:37, 7 May 2016 (UTC)br>
  •   Support I don't see something wrong with lighting. maybe the photo is not pin sharp, but can pass QI. --C messier 12:33, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support What the fuck hell is "unsharp lighting"? Are you trolling us, Moheen? --Cccefalon 07:14, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
please moderate --Moroder 12:29, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 06:10, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Marca camino Armentia 09.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Trail sign in Armentia/Eskibel. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 15:01, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Insufficient quality. Posterized. --Moheen Reeyad 17:46, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support There is some slight posterisation if you scutinize the image, but is negligible IMHO, QI. --C messier 12:43, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
    •   Comment I suppose Moheen refers to posterisation in the sky. If anyone thinks applying NR could improve the IQ, I'll do so. Actually, there is none. --Basotxerri 19:44, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Examined it on EIZO calibrated screen. Nothing, what ever raised complaints about sky in QIC. If I took the "finding" of Moheen, I had to decline all of his photos for sky problems. See for example the Patenga beach series which includes minor sky problems and chromatic noise. Calm down a little bit, Moheen. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 07:09, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Spurzem 08:38, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ralf Roletschek 17:27, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support --Hubertl 06:11, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 06:11, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Fondaco_Marcello_Canal_Grande_Venezia.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination The Fondaco Marcello, on the left Palace Palazzo Garzoni in Venice. Facade on Grand Canal. --Moroder 06:22, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose Insufficient quality. Distortion on water. --Moheen Reeyad 17:46, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support QI. The kind of distortion must be better explained, if there is one. --C messier 12:45, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Never heard of this kind of distortion. Photographic requirements are met. --Cccefalon 07:01, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Spurzem 08:40, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ralf Roletschek 17:28, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 06:11, 10 May 2016 (UTC)