Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 14 2020

Consensual review edit

File:Berlin_brandenburg_airport_terminal_1_sunrise.jpg edit

 

  •   Comment Right. But is the airport a public place?
  • Yes, it is.--Peulle 07:41, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
  • If that helps: for non-public the same, of course. --A.Savin 11:02, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Question So that image is illegal in Germany? --Augustgeyler 13:19, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Did you actually read any one single row of COM:FOP or de:Panoramafreiheit? Of course you're allowed to take pictures of copyrighted objects anywhere you're allowed to take pictures in general; yet in many cases you may not upload derivative works on Commons, due to its restrictive policies. --A.Savin 17:40, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
  • All I wanted to understand why you mentioned this in the first place.--Augustgeyler 10:25, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Augustgeyler 00:26, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Viaduc_-_arches_(Morlaix).jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Viaduct arches in Morlaix (Finistère, France). --Gzen92 12:22, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Foreground is a little blurred at 100% but still acceptable given that the aim is to capture detail into the distance. Good composition and exposure. --Bobulous 16:33, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Request I modified sharpness, I ask for a discussion. Gzen92 07:38, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Good and interesting image -- Spurzem 12:24, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment It is a very good composition. The only thing I could find was that the surfaces are looking unnatural at 100%. Perhaps to strong noise reduction or intense sharpening was applied or the combination of both? --Augustgeyler (talk) 18:45, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support per others. I don't understand why you moved this to Discussion after a supporting vote. -- Ikan Kekek 19:34, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment I changed the sharpness after approval. Gzen92 10:32, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment You added sharpness though, right? So that doesn't seem to be a reason to move this to discussion. -- Ikan Kekek 16:54, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Ok thanks, I didn't know. Gzen92 10:44, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Augustgeyler 12:11, 13 November 2020 (UTC)