Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 23 2014

Consensual review

edit

File:Val_Mont_dal_Ega_y_Ncisles.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination The "Mont dal Ega" in the Geisler and Puez group (Dolomites). --Moroder 18:13, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. More than good! --Hubertl 20:48, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

*  Oppose I disagree. There is a big dust spot. I made an annotation. --Cccefalon 20:59, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

    •   Done Its not big, it's the same size as usual ;-) . Thanks --Moroder 09:25, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support -- This is a superb photo and probably deserves a bit more than the QI seal... Alvesgaspar 13:41, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support Thanks for removing. Good quality now. As the one who stopped the promotion yesterday, I would say, that there is no reason to keep it in CR for a week. --Cccefalon 14:16, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Ok,ok resolved   --LivioAndronico talk 15:47, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Vologda_Kremlin.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Ансамбль Вологодского кремля (Вологодская область, Вологда, Улица Орлова, 15). By User:Vitaly Alyabyev --Rubin16 19:13, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice quality but right side is leaning in and I would appreciate to brighten shadows a bit. --C messier 19:23, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
      Support Ok, right side is a bit leaning in, but good IMO with or without perspective correction--Lmbuga 19:46, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Weak   Support. Some clipping on glossy surfaces, but acceptable as these are only small areas. --Smial 10:37, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  • The lightning might be better, but the overall quality is good.   Support. --Brateevsky 10:49, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support The lightning is acceptable for me and the photo is good. --Steindy 21:58, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted C messier 11:58, 22 November 2014 (UTC)