Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 06 2014

Consensual review edit

File:14-08-00-wlm-es-RalfR-06.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Aqueduct in Cerdanyola del Vallès, Catalonia --Ralf Roletschek 21:31, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline

  SupportGood quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:52, 29 September 2014 (UTC)   Oppose noisy, unsharp/blurred, dustspots, CAs... --Christian Ferrer 08:14, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

  •   Oppose Noisy, oversharpened --Generic1139 16:31, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose on grounds of having a completely meaningless filename. Mattbuck 21:01, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per all others, and not contrasted enough.--Jebulon 11:38, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Jebulon 11:38, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

File:14-08-00-wlm-es-RalfR-07.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Aqueduct in Cerdanyola del Vallès, Catalonia --Ralf Roletschek 21:31, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:52, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose noisy, unsharp/blurred, dustspots, CAs... --Christian Ferrer 08:14, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Noisy, oversharpened --Generic1139 16:32, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose on grounds of having a completely meaningless filename. Mattbuck 21:02, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per all opposers, + lack of contrast .--Jebulon 19:12, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Jebulon 19:12, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Kłodzko,_barokowa_brama_09.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Baroque Gate on Kościelny Square in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 19:30, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support. QI -- Spurzem 13:18, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

*  OpposeWhere is the gate? Who is that man ? Not accurate description.--Jebulon 20:26, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

  •   Support very good photo,here isn't the competition of quality descriptions. --Ralf Roletschek 07:50, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
  •   Comment Jebulon is right for all images with this issue now on CR, it's on the guidelines: "Quality images must be categorized, have a meaningful title and description. This should include the Taxa naming for organisms." --Kadellar 09:58, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
  •   Comment. Es ist unglaublich, mit welchen Argumenten einwandfreie Fotos neuerdings abgeschmettert werden. Bewerten wir denn hier die Dateinamen oder die Bilder? -- Spurzem 12:26, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Außerdem steht im dateinamen, was es ist. Es muß nicht zwingend englisch sein. --Ralf Roletschek 14:22, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
We judge a whole, please read the guidelines. In "Commons", ein "Bild" ist nicht nur ein Bild.--Jebulon 22:31, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I agree with Jebulon. A detailed description is important for QI. Yann 16:05, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
    • It is not only important, it is the rule !!--Jebulon 22:31, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Rules can be absurd. And than common sense is asked. -- Spurzem 09:07, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
  •   Comment I completed the descriptions. --Jacek Halicki 10:32, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
  •   Support OK now. Yann 10:01, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
  •   SupportYou know why an accurate description is important ? Just because it is here the statue of my saint patron !😜--Jebulon 23:54, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Jebulon 19:16, 5 October 2014 (UTC)