Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 13 2020

Consensual review edit

File:Voznesenskaya_Davidova_Pustyn_-_St_Nicholas_Church_-_20170813_9412.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination Fragment of the facade of St. Nicholas Church (Voznesenskaya Davidova Pustyn). --Bff 19:50, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality --Llez 05:59, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   weak oppose asymmetrical crop--Virtual-Pano 20:35, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Asymmetrical? The left and right crops are almost perfectly symmetrical. Of course I would have preferred a version including the complete frame of the tondo, but it seems OK to me for QI. --Aristeas (talk) 09:12, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Palauenc05 11:04, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality, but Bff, please add a category for mosaics. -- Ikan Kekek 05:54, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
    Categories for mosaics added. Bff 16:43, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek 08:19, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Vincent60030 10:22, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Suraj_Tal_Lahaul_Himachal_Jul19_D72_10866.jpg edit

 

  • Nomination: Suraj Tal near Bara-lacha La, Himachal. Elev. 4,890m (16,040') --Tagooty 08:23, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
  •   Oppose Overexposed, plenty of dust spots --Podzemnik 06:31, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
  • @Podzemnik:   Done Removed dust spots. Reduced exposure to bring out detail in snow. It had snowed recently and there was bright sun, so I had overexposed to capture the moment. --Tagooty 10:27, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
    I used QICvote to enter my above response as a "Comment" -- it changed "Decline" to "Nomination". I've now manually changed to "Discuss". Please correct me if I've used QICvote incorrectly. --Tagooty 14:04, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Exposure is better now. But there are still dust spots remaining. --Milseburg 11:02, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
    •   Done @Milseburg: Removed a few spots in the sky and snow. --Tagooty 13:54, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Ok let's get time to hear other opinions. --Milseburg 13:00, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Please ad a geocode --Moroder 01:01, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
    •   Done --Tagooty 03:08, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Weak oppose A very good composition. But technically it is lacking detail and sharpness to be a QI. --Augustgeyler 08:09, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Weak support Because of the composition, the sharpness is still ok.--Tesla - 💬 10:20, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Foreground is too unsharp, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 14:15, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Augustgeyler 12:46, 12 October 2020 (UTC)