Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 18 2016

Consensual review

edit

File:Reichsgraben_Kellergasse,_Zellerndorf_Niederösterreich-6738.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Winemaker alley with press houses and wine cellars, Reichsgraben, located in Zellerndorf, Lower Austria. By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Hubertl 15:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose too dark for me --Pudelek 15:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC) Now is ok --Pudelek 10:11, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
    •   Done Its good practice, not to decline images with such simple problems --Hubertl 17:35, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support - Certainly not too dark now, and good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 01:03, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support There is no doubt about good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:30, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality now --Kroton 05:43, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Yep, it's ok. W.carter 08:10, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 08:57, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 04:04, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Traktormuseum Bodensee - Entrance area.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Part of the entrance area of the Traktormuseum Bodensee --Llez 14:29, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment Upper side seems a bit overexposed IMO--Lmbuga 14:36, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality--Lmbuga 14:36, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
    •   Info I tried to improve a bit --Llez 15:00, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose. The upper part is much too bright. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 19:56, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Comment I would suggest you simply crop the picture, see note. That would really improve it. W.carter 11:24, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
    •   Done Crop as suggested, also a bit on the left side because of symmetry --Llez 11:31, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Wow! Love what you've done with the place. :) This transformed it from a snapshot to a work of art. cart-Talk 16:20, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support The upper part is cut now. O.K.! Very good done. -- Spurzem 18:41, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support - Good composition and the focus is quite adequate. -- Ikan Kekek 00:16, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 09:10, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Hubertl 04:06, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Arrival hall, Milano Centrale station, wide view.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Arrivals hall in Milano Centrale --Daniel Case 02:19, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 03:33, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose There are perspective issues, and overexposed roof. Sorry, I disagree. --A.Savin 07:41, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Too much noise, and lighting issues. --Peulle 08:42, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Hubertl 06:18, 17 September 2016 (UTC)