Commons:Valued image candidates/Colmar StMartin 114.JPG

Colmar StMartin 114.JPG

**promoted**
Image
Nominated by	Gzen92 ^[discuter] on 2018-01-11 12:10 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: *Retable de la Sainte Parenté de Jésus (Colmar) : Retable de Sainte Parenté de Jésus* (19th century)**
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Comment We must add a geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply] Done Sorry, I forget regularly. Gzen92 ^[discuter] 07:46, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply] Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply] `Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:24, 15 January 2018 (UTC)`[reply] Oppose - Not quite as useful, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:28, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply] Support Is there a big action to withdraw awards here? On the new photo I am disturbed by the headlights, which light up my face. That's why I like the older picture better. And anyway: Why can not two very similar pictures be considered valuable? -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 13:15, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply] Comment - Permitting more than one VI in the same scope would be a change in procedure. If you'd like to propose that, do so in an appropriate place and link the discussion here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:04, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply] Support. While the other candidate shows more of the subject and its environment, the lighting in this one is much less distracting and less "clinical". -- Veikk0.ma (talk) 10:37, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply] Comment - I haven't changed my mind. What we want in a VI is clarity in the depiction of the subject. The other photo is better in that respect. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:31, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply] Support Better lighting that does not distort colors --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply] Comment - Archaeodontosaurus, if you know that these colors are more accurate than the others, I will change my vote. Is the other photo too green? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:58, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply] Comment - I've crossed out my votes. I clearly lack the expertise to properly judge these photos, and I'm glad you have it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:02, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply] 1. Commons: Valued image candidates/Collégiale Saint-Martin - intérieur - retable de la Sainte Parenté de Jésus avec starburst (Colmar).jpg: +1 2. Commons: Valued image candidates/Colmar StMartin 114.JPG: +3<-- => 1. File:Collégiale Saint-Martin - intérieur - retable de la Sainte Parenté de Jésus avec starburst (Colmar).jpg : Declined and demoted to VI-former. 2. File: Colmar StMartin 114.JPG : Promoted<--