Support this, because datails of the ship are visible. Am going to nominate a separate Schubverband scope, to illustrate what a pusher pushes. --Ikar.us (talk) 13:04, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment 1/ I Agree that this image shows [a VI for this scope should show] well the characteristical square bow. 2/ May I suggest to slightly reword the scope in "pusher boat", because this term is more widely in use than "pusher ship" (([1]vs[2])? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Myrabella (talk • contribs) 2010-06-24T15:04:26 (UTC)
Comment I'm sorry to disagree with Myrabella. It is not a "pusher", but a "puller" transformed in "pusher". The metallic transformation visible here is not characteristic, because it was added, and the bow is not squared.--Jebulon (talk) 17:08, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yes, should have looked better. Oppose, not typical. But I like the idea of a front view of an idle pusher for this scope. --Ikar.us (talk) 20:37, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]