Commons:Valued image candidates/Horch V 12 Cabriolet 670 (museum mobile 2013-09-03).JPG

Horch V 12 Cabriolet 670 (museum mobile 2013-09-03).JPG

**promoted**
Image
Nominated by	Spurzem (talk) traced on 2022-03-16 08:42 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: One of 53 Horch 670, built from 1932 to 1934, in the museum mobile of Audi Forum in Ingolstadt, front and left side
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:22, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply] Comment @Spurzem: Scope is too descriptive (too narrow) per COM:VIS to define a generic field or category within which your image is the most valuable example. Please give some thought to providing a better one (just right). You know cars best. Would a scope of “Horch V12 Cabriolet 670 (1932 - 1934)” or something similar be appropriate? --GRDN711 (talk) 01:04, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply] I don't understand the point of the criticism, but thank you anyway for taking such an interest in my applications. -- Spurzem (talk) 08:19, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply] Oppose with regret, based on my previous comment on the scope being layered with unnecessary description such that it does not define a useful generic field for VI nomination. I have provided information per COM:VIS elsewhere on this page describing this issue, and offered suggestiions. --GRDN711 (talk) 21:31, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply] @GRDN711: I consider your "with regret" to be pure mockery. Please tell me frankly what you have against me. -- Spurzem (talk) 09:28, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply] Support Given its age, it can be considered a work of art in a museum. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply] Support Per Archaeo. --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:39, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply] Comment @Spurzem: @Archaeodontosaurus: @Palauenc05: I see some agreement in your comments that shorter and more specific is better for VI scopes. Also, COM:VIS actively discourages scopes that are too wordy (too narrow) and there is no requirement for location information to be part of any VI scope (can be placed in the image description). As I tried to present in my oppose, IMHO “Horch V12 Cabriolet 670 (1932 - 1934)” is a more specific, better scope and in keeping with COM:VIS. The VI claim would be that this image is the most valuable in Commons for this particular model of car, range of years. I would support VI for this image with that scope. --GRDN711 (talk) 02:23, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply] `Result: 3 support, 1 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 24 March 2022 (UTC)`[reply]