File:An analysis of related software cycles among organizations, people and the software industry (IA annalysisofrelat109454105).pdf
Original file (1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 1.11 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 90 pages)
Captions
Summary
editAn analysis of related software cycles among organizations, people and the software industry ( ) | ||
---|---|---|
Author |
Adams, Brady. |
|
Title |
An analysis of related software cycles among organizations, people and the software industry |
|
Publisher |
Monterey California. Naval Postgraduate School |
|
Description |
There is a need to understand cycles associated with software upgrades as they effect people, organizations and the software industry. This thesis intends to explore the moderating factors of these three distinct and disjointed cycles and propose courses of action towards mitigating various issues and problems inherent in the software upgrade process. This thesis will acknowledge that three related but disjointed cycles are common in many software upgrade ventures in today's organizations: a. End-user characteristics in adapting to new software b. Organizational ability to adopt new software c. The software industry's motivation and processes in introducing new software Realizing the importance of these related cycles involves developing an understanding of several aspects we research in this study. First, awareness in understanding why users adopt new software and the demographic factors involved, such as gender, age and experience are considered. Second, we present how organizations integrate new software by exploring factors such as cost, time, reliability and benefit analysis. Last, we provide evidence supporting motivating forces and factors behind software introduction rates within the software industry. These important aspects together culminate in cyclical phenomenon managers and executives need to be aware of, as implementing new software upgrades have become an inevitable undertaking in most of today's organizations. Subjects: Software maintenance; Management; Software reengineering; Computer software industry; Social aspects; Organizational behavior; United States |
|
Language | English | |
Publication date | June 2008 | |
Current location |
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink |
|
Accession number |
annalysisofrelat109454105 |
|
Source | ||
Permission (Reusing this file) |
Approved for public release, distribution unlimited |
Licensing
editPublic domainPublic domainfalsefalse |
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code.
Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.
|
||
This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights. |
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/PDMCreative Commons Public Domain Mark 1.0falsefalse
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 13:29, 14 July 2020 | 1,275 × 1,650, 90 pages (1.11 MB) | Fæ (talk | contribs) | FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection annalysisofrelat109454105 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #7482) |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Short title |
|
---|---|
Author | Brady Adams |
File change date and time | 9 June 2008 |
Date and time of digitizing | 9 June 2008 |
Software used | AFPL Ghostscript 8.54 PDF Writer |
Conversion program | AFPL Ghostscript 8.54 |
Encrypted | no |
Page size | 612 x 792 pts (letter) |
Version of PDF format | 1.4 |