Identifier: comparisonofindi00habr (find matches)
Title: Comparison of indirect and direct illumination
Year: 1912 (1910s)
Authors: Habrylwicz, Valentine Bernard Kailer, Frank Spencer
Subjects: Interior lighting Lighting School buildings Theses
Publisher:
Contributing Library: University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Digitizing Sponsor: University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

View Book Page: Book Viewer
About This Book: Catalog Entry
View All Images: All Images From Book
Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book.

Text Appearing Before Image:
u. or i. i.i. roRM 3 DIRECT S-OBSERVEDPlane 5 ftSTATION A 3 1 0.58 0.89 2 0.73 1.30 3 0.84 1.65 4 0.66 1.00 5 0.84 1.20 6 0.93 2.20 7 0.90 1.28 8 0.75 1.30 9 0.90 2.10 10 0.95 1.80 11 0.68 1.10 DATA.2 in. c D E 1.10 0.70 0.46 2.60 1.25 0. 52 2.65 1.60 0.31 1.25 0.90 0.48 1.74 1.10 0.60 1.71 1.58 0.57 2.10 1.90 0.75 1.90 1.50 0.63 3.50 2.10 0.78 3.20 1.80 0.70 1.30 1.10 0.57
Text Appearing After Image:
U. CF I. 6. 6. rCHM 3 27 VI. THEORY AND CALCULATION OF A DIRECT LIGHTING SYSTEM To get the normal illumination at any given point the oandle powerin the proper diredtion must be divided by the square of the distance to thepoint illuminated. If the surface is at right angles to the direction oflight, the value of illumination obtained must be multiplied by a reductionfactor, taking into account the angle at which the rays strike. Referring tothe diagram below, a beam of light coming in the direction OD falls upon a plane AB, illuminating it with an intensity of one foot-candle. Then theillumination on the plane AC,which intercepts the same amount of light asAB, would be less than one foot-candle (as the light is spread over a largerarea), in the ratio of AB to AC, which is the cosine of the angle ODF. Thusthe intensity on any plane at a given point will be C h

Note About Images