File:Cost and benefit analysis of alternatives to the Naval Reserve Officer Training Corps (NROTC) flight physical screening process (IA costndbenefitnal1094532957).pdf
![File:Cost and benefit analysis of alternatives to the Naval Reserve Officer Training Corps (NROTC) flight physical screening process (IA costndbenefitnal1094532957).pdf](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/71/Cost_and_benefit_analysis_of_alternatives_to_the_Naval_Reserve_Officer_Training_Corps_%28NROTC%29_flight_physical_screening_process_%28IA_costndbenefitnal1094532957%29.pdf/page1-463px-thumbnail.pdf.jpg?20200716092543)
Original file (1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 4.29 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 78 pages)
Captions
Captions
Summary
editCost and benefit analysis of alternatives to the Naval Reserve Officer Training Corps (NROTC) flight physical screening process
(![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
---|---|
Author |
Fuchs, Steven Anthony |
Title |
Cost and benefit analysis of alternatives to the Naval Reserve Officer Training Corps (NROTC) flight physical screening process |
Publisher |
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School |
Description |
Questions have arisen concerning the efficiency of the Naval Reserve Officer Training Corps (NROTC) flight physical screening process. This study analyzed two alternative means to aeronautically assess these individuals: restructuring the pre-commissioning flight physical and opening the Aviation Certification Evaluation and Screening (ACES) program to all NROTC aviation candidates. A detailed description of the current NROTC aviation screening system, quantification and analysis of flight physical attrition rates, and recommendations for streamlining the overall process are also provided. This thesis determined the optimal pre-commissioning flight physical site for every NROTC unit and used derived attrition information to estimate the cost of the current screening system, as well as the two selected alternatives. Further, all three screening options were compared against each other utilizing a cost- benefit analysis. Subjects: NA |
Language | English |
Publication date | 2000 |
Current location |
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink |
Accession number |
costndbenefitnal1094532957 |
Source | |
Permission (Reusing this file) |
Approved for public release, distribution unlimited. |
Licensing
editPublic domainPublic domainfalsefalse |
![]() |
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code.
Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.
|
![]() |
This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights. |
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/PDMCreative Commons Public Domain Mark 1.0falsefalse
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 09:25, 16 July 2020 | ![]() | 1,275 × 1,650, 78 pages (4.29 MB) | Fæ (talk | contribs) | FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection costndbenefitnal1094532957 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #12532) |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Short title | Cost and benefit analysis of alternatives to the Naval Reserve Officer Training Corps (NROTC) flight physical screening process |
---|---|
Author | Fuchs, Steven Anthony |
Software used | Fuchs, Steven Anthony |
Conversion program | Adobe Acrobat 10.1.6 Paper Capture Plug-in |
Encrypted | no |
Page size | 612 x 792 pts (letter) |
Version of PDF format | 1.4 |