File:The Quarterly journal of the Geological Society of London (12511918805).jpg

Original file(1,869 × 3,200 pixels, file size: 1.33 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary

edit
Description

SEDGWICK ON THE MAY HILL SANDSTONE.
219
detain the reader one moment in a general description of these well-
known sections ; and the accompanying sketch is simply used to help
the memory, and to give coherence to the subjoined remarks.
Fig. 3. — Diagram showing the succession of rocks from the May Hill
Sandstone upwards.
S.W. May Hill. N.E.
1. Coal-iield of the Forest of Dean.
2. Mountain limestone.
3. Old Red Sandstone.
4. Upper Ludlow.
5. Aymestry limestone.
6. Lower Ludlow.
7. Wenlock limestone.
8. Wenlock shale.
g. Woolhope limestone.
10. May Hill sandstone.
The "Woolhope sections are the most perfect and symmetrical ;
but the May Hill section was best for our purpose ; viz. to examine,
and connect together, the two groups which are at the base of the
section. In the May Hill section we have the following groups in
true descending order : — 1 . The Carboniferous series ; 2. The Old-
red-sandstone ; 3. The Ludlow series (Nos. 4, 5, 6 of the sketch) ;
4. The Wenlock series (Nos. 7, 8 of the sketch). Respecting these
four groups there has been no doubt since the Silurian Sections were
first published by Sir R. I. Murchison. 5. These groups are fol-
lowed by thin bands of concretionary limestone (No. 9 of the sketch),
separating the base of the Wenlock shales from the underlying grits
of May Hill. 6. The shelly sandstones and grits which form the
dome-like elevation of May Hill (No. 10).
The last two groups of this section were considered, in the " Silu-
rian System," as Caradoc sandstone. Subsequent labourers, espe-
cially Professor Phillips, have pointed out good reasons for regarding
the bands of concretionary limestone as an integral part of the Wenlock
series ; but he and the other Government Surveyors have coloured and
described the May Hill grits, &c. as Caradoc sandstone.
The bands of limestone last mentioned might, I think, be most
conveniently called Lower Wenlock limestone ; but the name Wool-
hope limestone having for some time passed current, I will here
adopt it. All the Silurian limestones are local phsenomena ; none
of them are so persistent as to offer good terms of comparison be-
tween countries, of the same age, which are widely separated. This
remark applies with all its force to the Woolhope limestone. Round
May Hill it is in many places so degenerate as to have been over-
looked in the sections. At Littlehope (and in other places within
the Woolhope elevation) it is more clearly developed, and cannot
escape notice, as it is extensively burnt for lime. At Presteign it
reaches its maximum of development ; and it there so entirely re-
sembles the most complete form of Wenlock limestone, that for many
years it was confounded with that rock * .

  • See Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. vi. p. 435.
VOL. IX. — PART I. Q
Date
Source https://www.flickr.com/photos/biodivlibrary/12511918805
Author Geological Society of London
Full title
InfoField
The Quarterly journal of the Geological Society of London.
Page ID
InfoField
34983332
Item ID
InfoField
108767 (Find related Wikimedia Commons images)
Title ID
InfoField
51125
Page numbers
InfoField
Page 219
BHL Page URL
InfoField
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/34983332
Page type
InfoField
Text
Flickr sets
InfoField
  • The Quarterly journal of the Geological Society of London. v. 9 (1853)
Flickr tags
InfoField
Flickr posted date
InfoField
14 February 2014
Credit
InfoField
This file comes from the Biodiversity Heritage Library.

This tag does not indicate the copyright status of the attached work. A normal copyright tag is still required. See Commons:Licensing.


العربية  বাংলা  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  日本語  македонски  Nederlands  polski  +/−



Licensing

edit
w:en:Creative Commons
attribution
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license.
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
This image was originally posted to Flickr by BioDivLibrary at https://flickr.com/photos/61021753@N02/12511918805. It was reviewed on 27 August 2015 by FlickreviewR and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-2.0.

27 August 2015

This image is in the public domain because it is a mere mechanical scan or photocopy of a public domain original, or – from the available evidence – is so similar to such a scan or photocopy that no copyright protection can be expected to arise. The original itself is in the public domain for the following reason:
Public domain

This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer.


This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1929.


This tag is designed for use where there may be a need to assert that any enhancements (eg brightness, contrast, colour-matching, sharpening) are in themselves insufficiently creative to generate a new copyright. It can be used where it is unknown whether any enhancements have been made, as well as when the enhancements are clear but insufficient. For known raw unenhanced scans you can use an appropriate {{PD-old}} tag instead. For usage, see Commons:When to use the PD-scan tag.


Note: This tag applies to scans and photocopies only. For photographs of public domain originals taken from afar, {{PD-Art}} may be applicable. See Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current16:00, 20 February 2022Thumbnail for version as of 16:00, 20 February 20221,869 × 3,200 (1.33 MB)SteinsplitterBot (talk | contribs)Bot: Image rotated by 270°
23:21, 26 August 2015Thumbnail for version as of 23:21, 26 August 20153,200 × 1,869 (1.33 MB) (talk | contribs)== {{int:filedesc}} == {{BHL | title = The Quarterly journal of the Geological Society of London. | source = http://www.flickr.com/photos/biodivlibrary/12511918805 | description = SEDGWICK ON THE MAY HILL SANDSTONE. <br> 219 <br> detain the reader one...

There are no pages that use this file.