User talk:Alvesgaspar/archive12
Please use sub-categories
edit
Valued Image Promotion
editCongratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stomorhina lunata.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
editCongratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nephrotoma appendiculata (Spotted Crane-Fly), female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aloe July 2009-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fly and bug June 2009-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dragonfly July 2009-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File:Tomar December 2008-4.jpg
editThe latest version of your picture seems to be corrupted. Can you please check this and perhaps upload the last version again? Sorry, when this is only a problem in Germany. thx --Mbdortmund (talk) 21:49, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dragonfly July 2009-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bug June 2009-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File:Butterfly_October_2007-3.jpg
editHello! I am not a butterfly expert and today I went out and took some images of butterflies in a park in Stockholm. As I tried to detemine the species of the ones in my pictures, I used a book on butteflies that I borrowed at the library, but the pictures are quite small, so I tried to compare with the images on wikimedia, as they are often bigger and better. I just could not decide if my butterfly was Pieris brassicae or Pieris rapae. So I found your beautiful picture of a pieris rapae, but then I got confused because the black markings on the top of the forewing, as seen though looks very much like the example of the Pieris brassicae because it goes down the wing, while the black marking on the P. rapae only has a black triangle on the top of the wing. As the same species of butterflies can look a bit different depending on which generation of the year they are, male female, I cannot tell you you were wrong about your species determination. I can only say it looks like the example of Pieris brassicae shown in the book "Svenska Fjärilar En Fälthandbok" written by Bo Söderström. --Korall (talk) 21:46, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rana June 2009-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Photo Use
editI would like to use your photo of "mullein" in a gardening calendar I'm writing, which I will propose to a publisher. The photo is at http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2a/Verbascum_sinuatum_August_2007-1.jpg May I use it, and if so how shall I attribute it? Thanks, Annie
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tomar December 2008-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
editCongratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ploiaria domestica.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tomar December 2008-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porto July 2009-1a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porto July 2009-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porto July 2009-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porto Covo April 2009-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Waves July 2009-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|