User talk:Collard/Archive 7
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
you said that
"Kept. Grow up, Deleteers before I upload an animated GIF of it in acid-trip colours. If you don't like it or it insults your national pride, don't look at it. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 07:22, 22 February 2008 (UTC)"
no words — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.232.173.19 (talk • contribs) 21:16, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- "No words" makes it two. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 08:10, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
De-adminship warning
Dear Collard/Archive 7. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.
If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.
You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.
Thank you
The Commons Barnstar | ||
Hello, you have asked for a desysoped because you didn't have enough time anymore. I give you this barnstar for all your hard work at Commons. I hope that you will ask again for admin rights when you have enough time. With deep respect, Huib talk 19:41, 8 August 2009 (UTC) |
Pub or public house
Hi Collard, we seem to have both. I we would standardize, what would you prefer? Multichill (talk) 15:09, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm. I'd prefer "pub", since that's the term everyone uses in conversation. I doubt you'd find "public house" outside of a legal document. :) Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 16:31, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- Ok. That's what I thought too. I nominated all categories at Special:PrefixIndex/Category:Public houses and still have to nominate most of Special:PrefixIndex/Category:Public Houses (have to get rid of the capital H anyway). Multichill (talk) 17:10, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 365504 at King's Lynn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ouse relief channel at last light.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Don't understand your revert rationale.
RE. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-signature_tag&diff=next&oldid=32411666 I don't get it. You think more attention to what I boxed is bad? You think a box is bad? What does it matter whether it's used on a template or not? I don't get your edit summary at all.--Elvey (talk) 10:20, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- I'm not even sure what I was thinking. I was extremely tired at the time. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 21:47, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! German shepherd wanting to play.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Colossus the Cat 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Canon T90.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nikon F55.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Please Comment
here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Village_pump&action=edit§ion=50 . And Thank You for defending my genetic code figure in such a humorous way! Doug youvan (talk) 16:13, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! BMW E28 drifting (Tristan).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hyundai i10 in blue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Konica C35.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:49, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! E28 drift car, Norfolk Arena.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nissan drift car, white, front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2013-10-12 NDT Nick Statham R33 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
ArchiveBot
Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:40, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2014-07-05 NADT Ross Gregory.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2014-08-23 NADT Josh Phillips Mpact 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Congrats. I was just to late to strike my oppose bofore the promotion.--Tobias "ToMar" Maier (talk) 21:46, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Template:PD-JohnRogers has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |