Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Odisha1!

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Odisha1!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:13, 8 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

COMMONS:POTY edit

Hi there,

Thanks for your help on the POTY Committee! :)

I just noticed that you've made edits like [1] and [2]. However, if you add the people's names in the format to the Voters list, then a couple of bots will periodically go through all 805 pages and do that job for you - just from the voters page! :)

I just thought that I'd let you know so you don't have to do double the amount of work unnecessarily when the bots can fairly easily and quickly run through the pages.

Hope this helps,

The Helpful One 14:21, 30 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Thehelpfulone. --Srikant Kedia 15:09, 30 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi edit

Hi, could you please be more careful this user has no Global or Commons account and this user's commons account isn't even eligible. Please check to make sure that they actually have an account before verifying. Also when verified move to the appropriate section. Ancient Apparition (talk) 04:08, 1 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yes, Sorry for that. there was some error. I was going to correct it,but i saw that you have already corrected it. By the way thanks for your interest & help on Poty2010 --Srikant Kedia 04:22, 1 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Commons:Bots/Requests/orbot1 edit

If you're still interested in running a bot, please could you make a test run including examples of each aspect of the proposed work the bot will do? --99of9 (talk) 00:58, 22 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

MediaWiki talk:EnhancedPOTY.js/or.js edit

Hello Srikant, could you please translate it? Or was it accidentally created? Thanks in advance. -- RE rillke questions? 20:30, 24 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

POTY 2012 Committee edit

Since you were in last year Committee. I'm sending this mail as an invitation for you to join this year committee. My idea is to finish the list and galleries as soon as possible so we can start POTY in late January or early February 2013.

Best regards, Béria Lima msg 23:14, 13 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank You Beria for your invitation. Yes, awesome idea. --Srikant Kedia 16:48, 7 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

POTY 2012 Committee IRC Meeting edit

Hi, a POTY Committee IRC meeting will be held on Friday, December 28, 2012 around 8:00 AM PST. You can convert that time easily to your locale at this page

This date was selected because the largest number of people indicated that they would be available. The meeting is on Freenode IRC channel #wikimedia-commons-poty (webchat).

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks, Mono 02:06, 24 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open edit

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:02, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last yearReply

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement edit

POTY IRC meeting edit

This is just a reminder about the POTY IRC meeting which was scheduled to be *now*. -- Rillke(q?) 12:19, 20 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your request... edit

fulfilled: 23:59, 31 January 2015, Best --Steinsplitter (talk) 06:44, 1 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Steinsplitter: Thank You :-)

Candidates edit

Hi Odisha. I was also preparing candidates for POTY. I can finish the categories a few days. Uğurkent (talk) 21:11, 18 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thank You @Uğurkent: , You can use User:Rillke/gallery-sort.js for easy categorization. -- Odisha1 (talk) 07:41, 19 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Incomprehensible message in Template:POTY2015/Roundheader edit

At the bottom of Template:POTY2015/Roundheader there is completely incomprehensible message "The file this vote page is for is gone. Maybe it was moved or deleted." What should (or does) it mean? What was your intention? jdx Re: 06:04, 12 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Done Problem solved. jdx Re: 09:06, 12 April 2016 (UTC)Reply


Code issues in User:Odisha1/WLEI.css edit

Hi Odisha1, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:Odisha1/WLEI.css. Glad to see you coding in css! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 4 new prettyCss issues — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in css writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 9 char number 10 - Evidence: 16px
  2. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 10 char number 9 - Evidence: 16px
  3. WARNING: suggest-remove-unit:px: line 11 char number 11 - Evidence: 0px
  4. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 11 char number 11 - Evidence: 0px
  5. WARNING: suggest-remove-unit:px: line 13 char number 10 - Evidence: 0px
  6. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 13 char number 10 - Evidence: 0px
  7. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 13 char number 14 - Evidence: 3px
  8. WARNING: suggest-remove-unit:px: line 13 char number 18 - Evidence: 0px
  9. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 13 char number 18 - Evidence: 0px
  10. WARNING: suggest-remove-unit:px: line 13 char number 22 - Evidence: 0px
  11. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 13 char number 22 - Evidence: 0px
  12. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 21 char number 10 - Evidence: 2px
  13. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 22 char number 11 - Evidence: 15px
  14. WARNING: suggest-using:alpha(...): line 26 char number 14 - Evidence: progid
  15. WARNING: wrong-property:filter: line 26 char number 2 - Evidence: -ms-filter
  16. WARNING: invalid-value: line 36 char number 10 - Evidence: progid
  17. WARNING: browser-only:ie: line 44 char number 2 - Evidence: filter
  18. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 48 char number 23 - Evidence: -216px
  19. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 51 char number 23 - Evidence: -252px
  20. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 54 char number 23 - Evidence: -144px
  21. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 57 char number 23 - Evidence: -180px
  22. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 60 char number 23 - Evidence: -360px
  23. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 63 char number 23 - Evidence: -396px
  24. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 66 char number 23 - Evidence: -288px
  25. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 69 char number 23 - Evidence: -324px
  26. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 72 char number 23 - Evidence: -72px
  27. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 75 char number 23 - Evidence: -108px
  28. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 81 char number 23 - Evidence: -36px
  29. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 85 char number 47 - Evidence: 2px
  30. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 88 char number 10 - Evidence: 3px
  31. WARNING: suggest-remove-unit:px: line 88 char number 27 - Evidence: 0px
  32. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 88 char number 27 - Evidence: 0px
  33. WARNING: suggest-remove-unit:px: line 88 char number 45 - Evidence: 0px
  34. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 88 char number 45 - Evidence: 0px
  35. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 88 char number 61 - Evidence: 2px
  36. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 101 char number 10 - Evidence: 5px
  37. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 102 char number 10 - Evidence: 1px
  38. WARNING: deprecated:border-radius: line 103 char number 2 - Evidence: -moz-border-radius
  39. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 103 char number 22 - Evidence: 5px
  40. WARNING: deprecated:border-radius: line 104 char number 2 - Evidence: -webkit-border-radius
  41. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 104 char number 25 - Evidence: 5px
  42. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 105 char number 17 - Evidence: 5px
  43. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 111 char number 9 - Evidence: 5px
  44. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 112 char number 14 - Evidence: 5px
  45. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 113 char number 17 - Evidence: 5px
  46. WARNING: deprecated:border-radius: line 114 char number 2 - Evidence: -moz-border-radius
  47. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 114 char number 22 - Evidence: 5px
  48. WARNING: deprecated:border-radius: line 115 char number 2 - Evidence: -webkit-border-radius
  49. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 115 char number 25 - Evidence: 5px
  50. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 116 char number 17 - Evidence: 5px
  51. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 117 char number 16 - Evidence: 5px
  52. WARNING: suggest-remove-unit:px: line 121 char number 16 - Evidence: 0px
  53. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 121 char number 16 - Evidence: 0px
  54. WARNING: suggest-remove-unit:px: line 121 char number 20 - Evidence: 0px
  55. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 121 char number 20 - Evidence: 0px
  56. WARNING: suggest-relative-unit:px: line 121 char number 24 - Evidence: 1px

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 19:03, 10 July 2016 (UTC).Reply


Code issues in User:Odisha1/WLEI.js edit

Hi Odisha1, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:Odisha1/WLEI.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 3 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 179 character 51: Unclosed regular expression. - Evidence: var m = mw.config.get('wgPageName').match(/\v\/);
  2. ISSUE: line 179 character 51: Unrecoverable syntax error. (6% scanned). - Evidence: undefined

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 21:45, 10 July 2016 (UTC).Reply


Code issues in User:Odisha1/WLEI.js edit

Hi Odisha1, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:Odisha1/WLEI.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new esprima issue — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ERROR: Cannot parse line 179 column 53: Invalid regular expression: missing /

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 21:45, 10 July 2016 (UTC).Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 10:45, 21 March 2017 (UTC)Reply