User talk:Ermell/Archive/2021

Latest comment: 2 years ago by QICbot in topic Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Notocactus schlosseri-20201220-RM-143106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:55, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mammillaria leucocentra-20201220-RM-222604.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:55, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Granada 06:56, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zentbechhofen Pfarrer-Reichelt-Platz 1 Amtshaus-20170507-RM-153805.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:55, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zentbechhofen Sühnekreuz-20170507-RM-153616.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:56, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:59, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zentbechhofen fire station-20170507-RM-152442.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Granada 06:56, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:58, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Breitengüßbach Bahnhof-20170801-RM-121429.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:52, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bojendorf Klärteich-20200425-RM-164040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:03, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burgruine Botenlauben--20170410-RM-152025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:52, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burgruine Botenlauben--20170410-RM-152453.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:54, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burgruine Botenlauben--20170410-RM-155005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:52, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Pappel-Schüppling (Hemipholiota populnea)-20201204-RM-154715.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pappel-Schüppling (Hemipholiota populnea)-20201204-RM-154715.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sudrach ST2274 Allee-20181008-RM-152802.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:22, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Granada 07:28, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reiterswiesen Kruzifix-20170410-RM-163617.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:34, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wien Fiaker -20140523-RM-094136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Granada 08:47, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wien Leopoldsbrunnen Detail-20140523-RM-092219.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Granada 08:47, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wien Schiffstation City-20140523-RM-111032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:33, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wien Stephansdom Wasserspeier-20140523-RM-095044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:21, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wien Pestsäule Detail-20140523-RM-092324.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 14:31, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schweinthal Schuppen Trubbach-20140413-RM-103339.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 08:09, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Echinofossulocactus zacatecasensis -20201220-RM-212827.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:32, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebern Aussegnungshalle-20180909-RM-115349.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:53, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebern Aussegnungshalle-20180909-RM-115453.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:18, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kleinziegenfeld Steinbruch-20140703-RM-092042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:22, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ferocactus glaucescens-20201220-RM-230824.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:44, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prag Loge Smetana Saal-20140524-RM-183539.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:44, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prague Hotel International-20140525-RM-083242.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:52, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zentbechhofen War memorial-20170507-RM-152137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:51, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 08:55, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burgruine Botenlauben--20170410-RM-152100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:09, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burgruine Botenlauben--20170410-RM-152622.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:15, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burgruine Botenlauben--20170410-RM-154914.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:10, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kleinziegenfelder Tal-20140703-RM-090652.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. Aber ich glaube, das heißt Kleinziegenfeld. --Granada 07:02, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the hint--Ermell 09:16, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kleinziegenfelder Tal-20140703-RM-094748.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Granada 07:02, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Püchitz Stadelbachbrücke -20160327-RM-113435.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:33, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Püchitz Stadelbachbrücke -20160327-RM-113104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:33, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zapfendorf Bahnsteig-20170731-RM-155020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:12, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebensfeld Bahnhof-20170814-RM-165453.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:21, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Breitengüßbach Bahnhof-20170801-RM-121504.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Granada 07:04, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unterzettlitz Brücke Niederauer Strasse-20170814-RM-173038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Überwurfbauwerk Hölzla-20171103-RM-142621.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:18, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magnusturm Panorama-20200823-RM-173643.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 19:36, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bischberg Rothof Maria im Wald-20170501-RM-111814.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 09:38, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bischberg Michelsberger Wald-20170501-RM-110620.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support A bit too dark, but good enough IMO. --Tournasol7 09:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat 2015-20180909-RM-171851.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:49, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebing Bauarbeiten Bahn-20160628-RM-092451.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:27, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schweinthal Schweinsmühle Trubbach-20140413-RM-102932.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. Crop at the bottom could be better. --XRay 07:27, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aufseß Friedhof-20200912-RM-163004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:32, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Kissingen Theater-20170408-RM-130641.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:28, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Kissingen Kriegerdenkmal-20170408-RM-131404.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:33, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aufseß Judenfriedhof-20200912-RM-170214.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Granada 07:50, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aufseß Judenfriedhof-20200912-RM-170047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:08, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chevrolet Nova SS (1974)-20180909-RM-171553.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Granada 08:18, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kleinziegenfelder Tal-20140703-RM-091221.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:34, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prag tram line 5 20140525-RM-084849.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:34, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shanghai marriage market-20150516-RM-104905.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Granada 08:18, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wien Fiaker -20140523-RM-101346.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:34, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mammillaria leucocentra-20201220-RM-220153.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:14, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porsche 911 Carrera Emblem-20190501-RM-154704.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:10, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shanghai White Cloud Temple-20150518-RM-105447.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:11, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Times Square nachts-20120518-RM-015143.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:10, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zentbechhofen Kirche Altar-20170507-RM-150048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:11, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zentbechhofen Kirche-20170507-RM-152521.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:05, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zentbechhofen Kirche Decke-20170507-RM-151900.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:14, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basel Münster Fenster-20120505-RM-151800.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:07, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basel Münster Fenster-20120505-RM-151642.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:07, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basel Münster Fenster-20120505-RM-151554.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:07, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebensfeld Bahnhof Unterstand-20170814-RM-164932.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:31, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zentbechhofen Kirche Pieta-20170507-RM-162253.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Granada 07:04, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zapfendorf Bahnsteig-20170731-RM-154159.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:20, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wien Stephansdom Wasserspeier-20140523-RM-095125.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:48, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wien Fiaker -20140523-RM-102311.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 13:09, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unterzaunsbach Bauernhaus Ruine-20140413-RM-102220.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:48, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York Vivian Beaumont Theater-20120520-RM-192313.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:23, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porsche 911 Carrera Motorhaube-20190501-RM-154600.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:31, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat 2015-20180909-RM-171853.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:31, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burgruine Botenlauben--20170410-RM-155210.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:31, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basel Sevogelbrunnen-20120505-RM-153922.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:31, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Title on your photo

FYI - This photo - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevrolet_Bel_Air#/media/File:Chevrolet_Bel_Air_1955_Ebern_2019_6200328.jpg - is titled "A look-alike to the 1955 Bel Air in American Graffiti", but that statement is not correct. The image shows a 1955 Chevrolet Belair 4 door sedan, in black. The black 1955 Chevrolet driven by Harrison Ford in the movie "American Graffiti" was not the top of the line Bel Air model (which would have been a 2 door pillarless hardtop, not a 2 door pillared sedan), but a base level Chevrolet 150, without the stainless steel trim visible in your photo. The car used in the movie also featured an obvious, aftermarket hood scoop. Ergo, while there are broad similarities, the car pictured is not a "A look-alike to the 1955 Bel Air in American Graffiti", as the car in that film was NOT a Chevrolet Bel Air, and the car in your photo is a four door sedan, not a two door sedan.

Thanks for your hint. I did not edit the article in Wikipedia. You may correct the mistake yourself and maybe a leave a note at the comment page.--Ermell (talk) 20:26, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wien Fiaker -20140523-RM-102212.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Granada 07:40, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wien Leopoldsbrunnen Detail-20140523-RM-092207.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:48, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wien Stephansdom Wasserspeier-20140523-RM-094824.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:49, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zapfendorf Bahnsteig-20170731-RM-153723.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Granada 07:40, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dodge Challenger SRT8 (2011)-20180909-RM-171447.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:52, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebing Station Bauarbeiten-20160628-RM-092104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:32, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Empire state building-20120518-RM-163038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:32, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kleinziegenfelder Tal-20140703-RM-094008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:13, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shanghai-20150516-RM-150204.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Can you please add at least one more cat? --Poco a poco 08:32, 14 January 2021 (UTC)  Done Thanks dor the review--Ermell 20:09, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:52, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stena Germanica Kiel 2006-20060726-RM-194139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:15, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dörfleins Ritzmann Marter-20210111-RM-160321.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:15, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basel Kunigunde-20120505-RM-150742.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:15, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basel Münster St.Martin-20120505-RM-152353.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:16, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

A file you uploaded is on the main page!

File:SanSebastian.Flag of La Concha, 2012.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

 

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shanghai Oriental Pearl Tower-20150516-RM-180306.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, sharp frpom bottom till top --Michielverbeek 08:18, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shanghai Pudong-20150516-RM-125343.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:42, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shanghai Oriental Pearl Tower-20150516-RM-123453.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:42, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shanghai White Cloud Temple-20150518-RM-110354.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 16:14, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zentbechhofen Pfarrkirche Orgel-20170507-RM-145809.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:11, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zentbechhofen Pfarrkirche Altar-20170507-RM-150635.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support GQ --Palauenc05 08:27, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zentbechhofen Kirche Pieta-20170507-RM-150720.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support GQ --Palauenc05 08:27, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wien Peterskirche Altar-20140523-RM-093240.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 13:12, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wien Franziskanerkirche Altar-20140523-RM-124151.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:21, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Danzig Marienkirche Engel Cello-20070402-RM-084004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:45, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dodge Charger (1967)-20180909-RM-171601.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 14:16, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebensfeld Bahnhof-20170814-RM-164634.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:45, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frankfurt (Main) Hauptbahnhof TGV-20140604-RM-131434.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 14:16, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schweinthal Schweinsmühle Trubbach-20140413-RM-103055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:45, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basel Münster-20120505-RM-152603.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:15, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kleinziegenfelder Tal-20140703-RM-094814.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:39, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veitlahm Kirche-20200927-RM-165730.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The right side seems leaning out. --Tournasol7 09:48, 13 January 2021 (UTC)  DoneThanks for the review.--Ermell 07:50, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
  Support Good quality now. Thanks! --Tournasol7 08:48, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ford Skyliner Retractable (1959)-20180909-RM-171557.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support GQ --Palauenc05 09:30, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sanspareil Theater-20180127-RM-160637.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:35, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sanspareil Belvederefelsen-20180127-RM-155705.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:52, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosario National Flag Memorial-20110510-RM-143140.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:35, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shanghai Fairmont Peace Hotel-20150516-RM-125411.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:35, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bischberg Michelsberger Wald-20170501-RM-105309.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:08, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York San Remo-20120520-RM-171707.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:21, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosario National Flag Memorial View-20110510-RM-144455.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:25, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Püchitz Stadelbachbrücke -20160327-RM-112507.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:31, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mühlhausen-Bahnübergang-6055948.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:28, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shanghai People's Square-20150516-RM-143756.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:32, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basel Münster St.Georg-20120505-RM-152450.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:36, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dörfleins Ritzmann Marter-20210111-RM-160342.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:24, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebing Station Bauarbeiten-20160628-RM-092639.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:24, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kleinziegenfelder Tal-20140703-RM-093532.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:21, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magnusturm Panorama-20200823-RM-173654.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:21, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sanspareil Belvederefelsen-20180127-RM-155000.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:24, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Ebing Kunststoffmatten-20160429-RM-160135.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ebing Kunststoffmatten-20160429-RM-160135.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ABS Nürnberg–Ebensfeld Kran Vollmond-20160718-RM-210716.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. IMO a FPC too. --XRay 09:18, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aufseß Judenfriedhof-20200912-RM-170438.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:24, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bischberg Rothof-20170501-RM-101336.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:29, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burg Rabeneck-20110807-RM-150513.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:21, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burg Zwernitz-20180130-RM-155857.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:22, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aisch Pfarrkirche-20170507-RM-160944.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 13:07, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Danzig Marienkirche Altar-20070402-RM-083633.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 13:07, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Danzig Marienkirche Trompetenengel-20070402-RM-084042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 13:06, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Danzig Marienkirche Uhr-20070402-RM-083459.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 13:06, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bischberg Rothof Maria im Wald-20170501-RM-112120.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 13:06, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frankfurt (Main) Hauptbahnhof TGV-20140604-RM-131532.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus to the head of the train --Michielverbeek 10:18, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basel Münsterfähre-20120505-RM-145245.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:17, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burgruine Botenlauben--20170410-RM-155848.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:49, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ABS Nürnberg–Ebensfeld Hölzla Kran-20160623-RM-222344.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Interesting picture, without technical problems. --Miha Peče 09:19, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valencia Palau de la Música-20100203-RM-180045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:41, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shanghai Oriental Pearl Tower-20150516-RM-130617.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:41, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sanspareil Theater-20180127-RM-160509.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:41, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eichig Felsenlabyrinth Winter-20210110-RM-160510.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:15, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shibarikyū-Park Japan1097.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:09, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Girona Kathedrale Santa Maria-20100202-RM-172108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:09, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! China Jinan Panorama-20150520-RM-105038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:49, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eichig Felsenlabyrinth Winter-20210110-RM-150849.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:09, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burg Zwernitz-20180130-RM-160622.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:09, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Your most memorable shot 2020

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

Over the course of the past two years, we've been sharing pictures that have a special meaning with each other at the start of the new year. Today, I'm inviting you add your most memorable shot of 2020 to this page:

I hope you, your familiy, and your friends are well during these difficult times. I wish you all the best for 2021 and I can't wait to see what your most memorable shot of 2020 looks like.

Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:57, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burg Zwernitz-20180130-RM-161216.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:59, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Danzig Wielka Stągiew -20070402-RM-093704.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Goodquality --Michielverbeek 07:20, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:21, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basel Wettsteinbrücke-20120505-RM-150041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:21, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Andorra l Vella-20100128-RM-165853.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:21, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prichsenstadt Tor-20110629-RM-155401.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:57, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mohnkapsel Schnee-20210125-RM-104740.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:14, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolmreuth Bauernhaus Villa-20180222-RM-111235.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:14, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mystic Whaler (ship 1967)-20120519-RM-155921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:39, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pettstadt Eisenbahnbrücke-20180213-RM-101900.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:57, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valencia Ciudad de las Artes y las Ciencias-20100203-RM-174013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:37, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valencia Ciudad de las Artes y las Ciencias L'Hemisfèric-20100203-RM-173930.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:21, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shanghai White Cloud Temple-20150518-RM-110331.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:41, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sanspareil Theater-20180127-RM-160708.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:41, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Girona Kathedrale Altar-20100202-RM-133310.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:55, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Danzig Wielka Stągiew -20070402-RM-093704.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:41, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosario Maria A ship-20110510-RM-144100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:12, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basel Mittlere Brücke-20120505-RM-145806.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:59, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

We would love to use your photo

Hi Reinhold, I edit the newsletter for a small Climate Action group (Staffordshire Moorlands Climate Action) in the UK and we would love to use your photo of the Shanghai Recycling Transport Tricycle to illustrate an article on recycling. I will of course credit you as outlined by Wikimedia Commons. Many thanks, Alison (McCrea) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alison McCrea (talk • contribs) 21:01, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

No problem.Thanks for the info. --Ermell (talk) 22:21, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Bischwind Wallfahrtskirche St.Maria-20201024-RM-163047.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bischwind Wallfahrtskirche St.Maria-20201024-RM-163047.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graz-Uhrturm-1080127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 11:32, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Adelsdorf Wegkapelle -20180218-RM-164152.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:51, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Danzig Rathaus-20070402-RM-092418.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:13, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Girona Kathedrale Santa Maria-20100202-RM-171004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:52, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prichsenstadt Tor-20110629-RM-155045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:51, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wien Stephansdom Wasserspeier-20140523-RM-095219.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:04, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shanghai Jade Buddha Temple Bonsai-20150517-RM-095000.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. But: The user categories should be hidden. Please use {{User category}}. --XRay 07:12, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sanspareil Hühnerloch-20180127-RM-153713.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:05, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Regensburg Bahnhof Zug-20180325-RM-203127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:17, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosario National Flag Memorial-20110510-RM-142842.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:52, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valencia Ciudad de las Artes y las Ciencias-20100203-RM-173452.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:52, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sanspareil Theater-20180127-RM-161115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:18, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosario National Flag Memorial View-20110510-RM-144139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 13:46, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bahnübergang-Stolzenroth-6055942.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Commonists 10:25, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buch-Bischwind Steinbruch -20200328-RM-161634.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:34, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buch-Bischwind Steinbruch -20200328-RM-164541.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:33, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Andorra l Vella-20100128-RM-174506.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:32, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shanghai-20150516-RM-150734.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 11:29, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prichsenstadt Luitpoldstraße-20110629-RM-161344.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The crop is too close and strong CAs at the top. --XRay 07:11, 1 February 2021 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review.--Ermell 15:08, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
  Support IMO acceptable for QI. --XRay 16:04, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shanghai Oriental Pearl Tower-20150516-RM-174122.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It looks a little bit too dark and oversharpened around the top. Especially the sky is oversharpened. --XRay 07:11, 1 February 2021 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review.--Ermell 15:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. Thank you. --XRay 16:06, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sanspareil Theater-20180127-RM-155504.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 09:03, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prichsenstadt Freihof-20110629-RM-160752.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 09:03, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosario National Flag Memorial View-20110510-RM-144321.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 11:21, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shanghai Jade Buddha Temple door-20150517-RM-103630.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 09:03, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edinburgh Waverley Station-20110903-RM-161203.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 09:03, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Danzig Marienkirche-20070402-RM-094341.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Danzig Neptunbrunnen-20070402-RM-091933.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebermannstadt Mühle-20160821-RM-151609.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edinburgh Arthur's Seat-20110904-RM-121450.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edinburgh Waverley Station-20110903-RM-161203.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

  Photo Challenge – Third Place
 
Congratulations!

Your picture Basel Exhibition demolition-20120505-RM-130722.jpg won the 3rd place in the Photo Challenge Demolition, in December 2020. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 03:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eichig Felsenlabyrinth Winter-20210110-RM-151135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:54, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchehrenbach Stein-20160821-RM-165610.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Commonists 10:57, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lanzendorf Brücke A9-20070628-RM-173451.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Not sharpest, despite the f/8 but I like the composition. --Etaped 13:55, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moskau Verteidigungsministerium-20080601-RM-094630.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 16:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St.Petersburg Kirchturm-20070703-RM-132500.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:08, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St.Petersburg Kuppel-20070703-RM-132731.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shanghai White Cloud Temple-20150518-RM-105545.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 09:16, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shanghai Jade Buddha Temple-20150517-RM-095633.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 09:27, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shanghai Jade Buddha Temple-20150517-RM-095254.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 10:03, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eichig Felsenlabyrinth Winter-20210110-RM-155445.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eichig Felsenlabyrinth Winter-20210110-RM-152040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:11, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eichig Felsenlabyrinth Winter-20210110-RM-160425.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 19:25, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pinot Grigio-20201027-RM-114053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. And looks magnificent! --LexKurochkin 10:38, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Pinot Grigio-20201027-RM-114053.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pinot Grigio-20201027-RM-114053.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brügge Beginenhof-20140322-RM-131715.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 08:16, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Miha Peče 09:42, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moskau Novospassky Kloster-20070704-RM-214459.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and nice light. -- Ikan Kekek 09:05, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prichsenstadt Fachwerkhaus-20110629-RM-160113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support good quality. --Palauenc05 11:05, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altendorf Bahnübergang-20170414-RM-093554.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 15:29, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eggolsheim Bahnhof-20170414-RM-100153.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eggolsheim Bahnübergang-20170414-RM-095409.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eggolsheim Bahnübergang-20170414-RM-094817.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Liridon 15:35, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Danzig Marienkirche-20070402-RM-093632.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 11:22, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shanghai marriage market-20150516-RM-104940.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:59, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edinburgh Holyrood Palace-20110904-RM-130303.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:20, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edinburgh Salisbury Crags-20110904-RM-122306.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:22, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edinburgh Scott Monument-20110903-RM-160826.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Sharpness could be better. And please fix the red link. There should be no red link as category. --XRay 12:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Köln Strassenkünstler Schirm-20060519-RM-124306.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:21, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris Montmartre Sacré-Cœur Gargoyle--20140603-RM-160952.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aufseß Herrenfriedhof-20200912-RM-163939.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 20:56, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brügge Sint-Annarei-20140322-RM-160413.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:13, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Danzig Krantor-20070402-RM-094133.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:13, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eggolsheim Bahnübergang-20170414-RM-094339.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:13, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eichig Felsenlabyrinth Winter-20210110-RM-151027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:33, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London Royal Albert Hall-20130715-RM-175400.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:33, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Next Commons Photographers meeting featuring large format photographer Ben Horne

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm happy to invite you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, March 20, at the usual time. As I mentioned during our last get-together, I'd like to invite external guests every now and then, given that it seems good to expand our view and learn something from someone outside our community.

Our first external guest, Ben Horne, will talk about large format wilderness photography, followed by a question-and-answer session. Ben is maybe one of best known contemporary large format photographers in the United States. On his excursions to national parks, he shoots 8×10 film and talks about his adventures on his YouTube channel which has attracted more than 48,000 followers so far. He is YouTube's first, and longest active landscape photography vlogger and I'm thrilled that he has agreed to join our next meeting and talk about his experiences.

If you're interested in joining this meeting, please sign up on the page below:

Also, don't forget to post your question(s) prior to the meeting on the following page in order to ensure a good and fruitful question-and-answer session:

I'm very much looking forward to this event and I hope you'll be able to join.

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:01, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brügge Bonne Chiere Mühle -20140322-RM-155322.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Fischer.H 10:37, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brügge Sint-Annarei-20140322-RM-160518.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tesla Delacroix 11:53, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brügge Sint-Annarei-20140322-RM-160413.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Fischer.H 10:40, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brügge Begijnhof Daffodils 1260329-PSD.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Commonists 12:11, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brügge Bonne Chiere Mühle -20140322-RM-154705.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tesla Delacroix 11:52, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Monaco-Sculpture-4070974.jpg

 
File:Monaco-Sculpture-4070974.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:28, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hirschaid Wegkapelle-20170414-RM-092418.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:57, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchehrenbach Kapelle-20160821-RM-165646.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:57, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moskau Novospassky Kloster-20070704-RM-200805.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:55, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:57, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hirschaid Friedhofskapelle-20170414-RM-092526.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:57, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Girona Kathedrale Santa Maria-20100202-RM-171802.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:57, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bamberg Hainweiher Winter-20210214-RM-120707.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:58, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bamberg Pavillion Winter-20210214-RM-121100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:58, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bamberg Pavillion Winter-20210214-RM-121601.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:58, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bamberg Trompetenbaum Catalpa bignonioides-20210214-RM-120901.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:08, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sanspareil Morgenländischer Bau-20210214-RM-161906.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:08, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Use of image: Innenraum einer Phalaenopsis cultivar Orchideenblüte

Hello, I am hoping to include your photo of an orchid in a presentation about flower evolution. It won't be published, just shared with a small group of adults. I have credited you in the presentation with the following language: By Reinhold Möller, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=80270881

I hope this is okay. Thank you for taking and posting such a wonderful picture! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikeydanger (talk • contribs) 20:02, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

o.k. thanks for the info.--Ermell (talk) 20:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam-Central 1260465.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Commonists 16:18, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York San Remo-20120520-RM-172642.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:33, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moskau Verteidigungsministerium-20080601-RM-094628.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:33, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moskau Verteidigungsministerium-20080601-RM-094618.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eggolsheim Bahnübergang-20170414-RM-094558.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:48, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eggolsheim Bahngleise-20170414-RM-095908.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 11:43, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lanzendorf Brücke A9-20070628-RM-173224.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 15:18, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London Albert Memorial-20130715-RM-123333.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:32, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brügge Beginenhof Narzissen-20140322-RM-131414.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:55, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bischberg Michelsberger Wald-20170501-RM-103914.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 11:56, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buch-Bischwind Steinbruch -20200328-RM-161912.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:57, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Danzig Krantor Lange Brücke-20070402-RM-100451.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 11:54, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London Gloucester Road, London-20130715-RM-145337.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:28, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London Lowndes Street -20130715-RM-134716.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:28, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moskau Verteidigungsministerium-20080601-RM-094632.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Göltzschtalbrücke -20170824-RM-112655.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:35, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hirschaid Bildstock-20170414-RM-092400.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Commonists 08:46, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pettstadt Fähre-20180213-RM-100151.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:26, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sanspareil Felsengarten Wald-20210214-RM-160003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Nice but there's a red lens flare on the snow at the bottom --Basile Morin 09:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review.--Ermell 11:33, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 14:11, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sanspareil Belvederefelsen-20180127-RM-155658.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 09:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moskau Raumfähre Buran-20080601-RM-094724.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 21:35, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ebermannstadt Kirche Ölberg-20160821-RM-151918.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchehrenbach Stein-20160821-RM-165623.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 09:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shanghai White Cloud Temple-20150518-RM-104752.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 09:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sanspareil Regenschirmfelsen-20210214-RM-153431.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eichig Felsenlabyrinth Winter-20210110-RM-151706.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 09:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shanghai White Cloud Temple-20150518-RM-110936.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:56, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London New Zealand War Memorial-20130715-RM-132710.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:56, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eggolsheim Bahnhof-20170414-RM-100509.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:56, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eggolsheim Bahnhof-20170414-RM-095944.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eggolsheim Brücke Zug-20170414-RM-104555.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eichig Felsenlabyrinth Winter-20210110-RM-154651.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Commonists 11:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eggolsheim Bahnhof-20170414-RM-095545.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 10:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London Market Porter, Borough, SE1-20130714-RM-201327.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shanghai-20150516-RM-150535.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:13, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sint-Janshuismolen-20140322-RM-154925.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 07:54, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valencia Palau de la Música-20100203-RM-195239.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 07:54, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prichsenstadt Luitpoldstraße-20110629-RM-161329.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 07:54, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris Montmartre Sacré-Cœur Gargoyle--20140603-RM-160942.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 07:54, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sanspareil Regenschirmfelsen-20210214-RM-153347.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, but on the left are magenta CAs. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:52, 23 February 2021 (UTC)  Done
Thanks for the review.--Ermell 21:54, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks, better --PantheraLeo1359531 17:16, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moskau International House of Music-20070704-RM-194602.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Comment Sorry, it is slightly tilted CW (the left tube, glass wall) --LexKurochkin 08:53, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. IMO. I don't see any relevant tilting here (by the way: we are photographers, not structural engineers.) --JoachimKohler-HB 11:15, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  Support Good quality IMO. I don't see any relevant tilting. By the way: we are photographers, not structural engineers. --JoachimKohler-HB 11:18, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London Royal Albert Hall-20130715-RM-175050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but foreground a bit blurry --Michielverbeek 07:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolmreuth Bauernhaus Villa-20160821-RM-163933.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 08:56, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Höchstadt-Gasthaus--20210220-RM-163131.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:47, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Höchstadt-Marter-Schlossberg--20210220-RM-165312.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:46, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Höchstadt-Storch-Nest-RM-2209606.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice photo. -- Ikan Kekek 10:46, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Höchstadt-Brücke-20180501-RM-163958.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mosbatho 08:27, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kölner Zoo Leptoptilos crumeniferus-20110912-RM-112728.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. Nice one :) --LexKurochkin 07:33, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shanghai Jade Buddha Temple-20150517-RM-094944.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 12:40, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valencia Ciudad de las Artes y las Ciencias-20100203-RM-174122.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:34, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London Queen's Gate -20130715-RM-144920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I could not find any distortion --Cvmontuy 12:23, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London Sloane Street-20130715-RM-135517.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Distortion problem, use the wheels how reference --Wilfredor 12:44, 19 February 2021 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review.--Ermell 20:24, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 10:23, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edinburgh Arthur's Seat-20110904-RM-124927.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality, nice colours, a very beautiful photo. --Aristeas 10:23, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altendorf Bahnübergang-20170414-RM-093618.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:16, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eggolsheim Bahnübergang-20170414-RM-094445.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:35, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eggolsheim Bahnübergang-20170414-RM-094901.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:19, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eggolsheim Bahnübergang-20170414-RM-100608.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:35, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eggolsheim Brücke-20170414-RM-103012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 09:43, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Höchstadt-St.Georg-Turm-20180501-RM-170018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:15, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seßlach Kreuzkapelle Turm-20210225-RM-161106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:35, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unterneuses St.Maria-20210220-RM-151947.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:35, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unterneuses St.Maria-20210220-RM-152045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:03, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seßlach Kreuzkapelle Kruzifix-20210225-RM-161315.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:03, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bamberg Hain Kanadagänse-RM-2148461.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiesentheid St.Mauritius Brunnen-20210228-RM-164512.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:02, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Höchstadt-Brücke-20210220-RM-170438.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:41, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Höchstadt-Storch-Nest-RM-2209614.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:02, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seßlach Storch Nest-RM-2259802.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:02, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bamberg Hain Erpel-RM-2148413.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London Queen's Gate Mews-20130715-RM-145101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:00, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London Wellington Arch-20130715-RM-133515.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London West Halkin Street-20130715-RM-134415.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality (espec. for a 2013 photo!) and strinking. --Aristeas 08:19, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edinburgh Grassmarkt Pubs-20110902-RM-133553.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:45, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seßlach Stadtmauer-20210225-RM-164503.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 12:11, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seßlach Schulhaus-20210225-RM-162654.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:16, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seßlach Kirche Kruzifix-20210225-RM-162116.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 08:04, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seßlach innere Brücke-20210225-RM-165703.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:16, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seßlach Hattersdorfer Torturm-20210225-RM-160724.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:16, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luzern Pilatus and Lake 1170975.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:37, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kölner Zoo Leptoptilos crumeniferus-20110912-RM-112908.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 21:55, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kölner Zoo Pelecanus onocrotalus-20110912-RM-104935.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 21:57, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris Montmartre Sacré-Cœur Gargoyle--20140603-RM-160933.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:15, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seßlach Storch Nest-RM-2259808.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:18, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Höchstadt-Schloss-Tür-20180501-RM-170536.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eggolsheim Bahnhof Treppe-20170414-RM-101755.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ, interesting perspective --PantheraLeo1359531 17:51, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eggolsheim Bahnhof Übergang-20170414-RM-101617.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:22, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eggolsheim Brücke Zug-20170414-RM-104552.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:22, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hirschaid Bahnübergang-20170414-RM-093516.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:12, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Massey-Ferguson 158-20210225-RM-165954.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 07:22, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kölner Zoo Phoenicopterus ruber-20110912-RM-103031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 16:47, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Staffelstein Wohnhaus-20210305-RM-154706.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tesla Delacroix 08:46, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Staffelstein Wohnhaus-20210305-RM-162029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:28, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Staffelstein Wohnhaus-20210305-RM-161617.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tesla Delacroix 08:46, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Staffelstein Wohnhaus-20210305-RM-161815.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tesla Delacroix 08:46, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Staffelstein Rathaus-20210305-RM-162146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tesla Delacroix 08:46, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

POTD Notification

 
The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Küchenschelle mit Wassertropfen 2019-04-05 20-41-46 (C)-PSD.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

 

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiesentheid St.Mauritius Altar HDR-20210228-RM-165914.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 07:30, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiesentheid St.Mauritius Altar HDR-20210228-RM-165937.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 07:31, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Really beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek 07:56, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Yes, both St.Mauritius in Wiesentheid church photos and both St.Georg in Höchstadt church altar and ceiling photos are really beautifull. Thank you! --LexKurochkin 08:08, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Höchstadt an der Aisch Kirche Altar-20180501-RM-173456.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 07:31, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Höchstadt an der Aisch Kirche Orgel-20180501-RM-172210.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments High quality. Ikan Kekek 07:56, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Höchstadt an der Aisch Kirche-20180501-RM-173250.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 07:28, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 09:55, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seßlach Fachwerkaus-20210225-RM-163526.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:57, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seßlach Froschgrabenbrücke-20210225-RM-170317.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 07:59, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seßlach Holzskulptur Musiker-20210225-RM-162716.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:21, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Höchstadt-Storch-Nest-RM-2209603.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 15:35, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Höchstadt-Schloss-20210220-RM-170524.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:57, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Staffelstein Wohnhaus-20210305-RM-161948.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 07:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Staffelstein Rathaus Wappen-20210305-RM-162314.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 07:36, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Staffelstein St.Kilian Türmchen-20210305-RM-153349.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:58, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Staffelstein Wohnhaus-20210305-RM-154650.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Höchstadt-Brücke-20180501-RM-164114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:54, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Höchstadt-Schloss-20180501-RM-165049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Clément Bardot 08:21, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Höchstadt-altes-Rathaus-Storch--20210220-RM-165136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 20:06, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sanspareil Belvederefelsen-20210214-RM-154744.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:53, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seßlach Brücke-20210225-RM-165221.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:54, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Staffelstein Wohnhaus-20210305-RM-154752.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Quality is good enough, but some CAs to removed. --Tournasol7 08:59, 9 March 2021 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review.--Ermell 14:06, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
  Support Thank you for you! :) --Tournasol7 06:30, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Staffelstein Apotheke-20210305-RM-154521.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:20, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Staffelstein Adam Ries Denkmal -20210305-RM-162556.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:25, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Staffelstein Apotheke-20210305-RM-154450.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:12, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Staffelstein Hoftor-20210305-RM-154239.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:12, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Staffelstein Rathaus Uhr-20210305-RM-162058.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:03, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elektrische Oberleitung-20200507-RM-111655.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Alexander Novikov 09:42, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unterneuses St.Maria Turm-20210220-RM-151902.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:28, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edinburgh Scott Monument-20110903-RM-160833.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:36, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Massey-Ferguson 158-20210225-RM-165838.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:35, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London Princess Diana Memorial Fountain -20130715-RM-124600.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 08:50, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prichsenstadt Stadtturm-20210228-RM-153707.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 17:57, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galanthus nivalis mit Aphididae--20210301-RM-153708.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Wonderful and impressive! There are just some (soft) dust spots in the sky (see image notes), I would suggest to remove them. --Aristeas 08:38, 13 March 2021 (UTC)  Done
Thanks for the review.--Ermell 14:52, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
  Support Thank you very much! --Aristeas 15:53, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Staffelstein St.Kilian Turm-20210305-RM-163137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:47, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St.Petersburg Christi Auferstehungskirche -20070703-RM-160443.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:14, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 12:23, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiesentheid Kreuzigungsgruppe-20210228-RM-170146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 10:33, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unterneuses St.Maria Turm-20210220-RM-151909.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 09:10, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prichsenstadt Katholische Kirche-20210228-RM-155900.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Alexander Novikov 08:33, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiesentheid St.Mauritius Turm-20210228-RM-170351.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:15, 12 March 2021 (UTC)   Support Yes, good quality. --Milseburg 12:14, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shanghai Bund-20150516-RM-173803.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:38, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St.Petersburg Löwenbrücke-20070703-RM-184601.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Clément Bardot 07:57, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seßlach Stadtmauer-20210225-RM-164703.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:22, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Höchstadt-St.Georg-Tür-20180501-RM-170103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:09, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Höchstadt-St.Georg-Tür-20180501-RM-170057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:09, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche Prichsenstadt Tür-20210228-RM-154155.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:10, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiesentheid St.Mauritius Tür-20210228-RM-170049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:10, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiesentheid St.Mauritius Tür-20210228-RM-165754.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:10, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edinburgh Granny`s Green Steps-20110902-RM-133838.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Comment Nice photo, but there is violet-yellow moire on the roofs of two buildings in the center of image. Is it possible to fix? --LexKurochkin 22:19, 13 March 2021 (UTC)   Done Thanks for the hint. --Ermell 11:36, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
  Support Very good now. Thanks! --LexKurochkin 18:28, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AKW Grafenrheinfeld-20100912-RM-165921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:25, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Reminder: Commons Photographers meeting tomorrow

Just a quick reminder: the meeting with large format-photographer Ben Horne will happen tomorrow, Saturday, March 20. If you haven't done yet, please consider signing up for the event and add your questions to this page. This will be our first virtual meeting in 2021 and I'd be super happy if you could join. All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:58, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Staffelstein Wohnhaus-20210305-RM-154552.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:41, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Túllio F 15:11, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Staffelstein von Scheffel Denkmal-20210305-RM-154844.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Nice photo. Thanks! --LexKurochkin 11:18, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Staffelstein Wohnhaus-20210305-RM-162805.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Höchstadt-Rathaus--20210220-RM-164933.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Höchstadt-Schloss-20180501-RM-164555.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Staffelstein Gasthaus-20210305-RM-161846.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:21, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Staffelstein Rathaus-20210305-RM-162038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:21, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Staffelstein Torturm-20210305-RM-161309.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:21, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edinburgh Abbey Strand-20110904-RM-131415.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:12, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Danzig Krantor-20070403-RM-083629.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Clément Bardot 08:35, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seßlach Stadtmauer-20210225-RM-164612.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:22, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 17:29, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seßlach Wohnhaus-20210225-RM-163347.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 17:29, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seßlach innere Brücke-20210225-RM-165321.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Commonists 13:31, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seßlach Brücke Marter-20210225-RM-165153.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:22, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris Montmartre Sacré-Cœur Gargoyle--20140603-RM-160926.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Galanthus nivalis mit Aphididae--20210301-RM-153708.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Galanthus nivalis mit Aphididae--20210301-RM-153708.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altmannshausen Brücke-20210314-RM-172643.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:17, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altmannshausen Bildstock-20210314-RM-172452.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:17, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altmannshausen Wohnhaus-20210314-RM-172319.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 11:55, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altmannshausen Nepomuk-20210314-RM-172612.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:23, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altmannshausen Kriegerdenkmal-20210314-RM-172412.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:50, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seßlach Froschgrabenbrücke-20210225-RM-165549.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Commonists 13:05, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Höchstadt an der Aisch Kirche Altar-20180501-RM-172034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 08:56, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Höchstadt an der Aisch Kirche Altar-20180501-RM-172512.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality and so beautiful again :) Thank you! --LexKurochkin 08:57, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Höchstadt an der Aisch Kirche Kanzel-20180501-RM-172334.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 10:54, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Höchstadt an der Aisch Kirche-20180501-RM-173442.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 10:54, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Höchstadt an der Aisch Kirche Taufstein-20180501-RM-172813.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 10:54, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Adelsdorf Wegkapelle -20180218-RM-164017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Clément Bardot 07:10, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Danzig Krantor Lange Brücke-20070402-RM-094150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 07:52, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edinburgh Canongate Kirk-20110902-RM-153622.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:58, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edinburgh The Hub tower-20110902-RM-132556.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:58, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Höchstadt-altes-Rathaus--20210220-RM-165051.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:58, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prichsenstadt Flueresturm-20210228-RM-155129.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 09:44, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prichsenstadt Eulenturm-20210228-RM-160613.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:43, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prichsenstadt Eulenturm-20210228-RM-161147.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:43, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prichsenstadt Freihof Tür-20210228-RM-155354.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 11:25, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prichsenstadt Freihof-20210228-RM-155501.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:43, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altmannshausen Pfarrhaus-20210314-RM-172250.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:09, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Staffelstein Nepomukbrunnen-20210305-RM-162212.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:09, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Staffelstein Rathaus Turm-20210305-RM-162658.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:09, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Staffelstein Torturm-20210305-RM-161358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:09, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Höchstadt-Störche-RM-2209616.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:09, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberrimbach St. Sebastian-20210314-RM-162224.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
There is a white triangle top left due to processing. --C messier 20:27, 20 March 2021 (UTC)  Done Thanks for your hint.--Ermell 23:36, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --C messier 18:26, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lanzendorf Brücke A9-20070628-RM-174659.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 11:39, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prichsenstadt Friedhof-20210228-RM-153007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 12:42, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prichsenstadt Friedhof-20210228-RM-153222.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 17:07, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prichsenstadt Luitpoldstraße-20110629-RM-161339.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 11:39, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prichsenstadt Stadtmauer Eulenturm-20210228-RM-161211.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 13:12, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altmannshausen Brunnen-20210314-RM-173236.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:25, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altmannshausen Brücke-20210314-RM-172817.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 08:15, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altmannshausen ehem Feuerwehr-20210314-RM-173256.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:36, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altmannshausen Wohnhaus-20210314-RM-172114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:36, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Staffelstein Wohnhaus-20210305-RM-162940.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:36, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scheinfeld Bauernhaus-20210314-RM-164652.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 14:29, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prichsenstadt Stadtturm Uhr-20210228-RM-153724.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 14:29, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mühlhausen-Mühle--20210220-RM-161531.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:11, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moskau International House of Music-20070704-RM-195920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:11, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altmannshausen Kirche Altar HDR-20210314-RM-170802.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:35, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Handthal Kirche Altar HDR-20210325-RM-160421.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:01, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Höchstadt an der Aisch Kirche Altar-20180501-RM-172639.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Despite some noice in shadows and on the ceiling, OK --LexKurochkin 12:46, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchehrenbach Seitenaltar-20160821-RM-174006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:35, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crocus cultivars-20210326-RM-123445.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:25, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sanspareil Aeolusfelsen-20210214-RM-155731.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality, impressive light and colours. --Aristeas 08:50, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schnaid Panorama-20180501-RM-144559.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 06:52, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchrimbach Kirche-20210314-RM-160956.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:25, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchrimbach Pfeifers Brünnla-20210314-RM-161633.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:25, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unterneuses Kreuzschlepper-20210220-RM-152158.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 13:39, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seßlach Stadtmauer-20210225-RM-164246.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:55, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchehrenbach Grabplatte-20160821-RM-171559.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:55, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Template:QICpromoted/layout

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Larryasou ([[User talk:Larryasou|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:34, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Category:Xiaomi_smartphones_(Realme_series)

Template:Autotranslate Larryasou ([[User talk:Larryasou|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:36, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:01, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2021

Hallo Ermell,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2021 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Deutschland ist zum achten Mal dabei. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Wie du bei den Top 5 des vergangenen Jahres siehst, sind vor allem Tiere unter den Siegerbildern. Aus diesem Grund setzen wir den Fokus dieses Jahr stärker auf Landschaftsaufnahmen. Aber natürlich haben auch Tierbilder eine Chance zu gewinnen.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen. Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2021 - Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung. Falls du im Moment nicht wie sonst in die Natur fahren kannst, findest du vielleicht in den Tiefen deiner Festplatte oder auf dem Smartphone noch interessante Fotos.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 11:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

QIC - Erneuter Blick

Hallo Ermell! Ich habe ein von dir gereviewtes Bild überabeitet, s. Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#March_31,_2021 Es wäre prima, wenn du noch mal einen Blick drauf wirst. Danke, --Tuxyso ([[User talk:Tuxyso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:18, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:01, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotedUploader /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:03, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Danke in Sachen WLF

Hallo Reinhold,

vielen Dank, dass Du die WLF 2021-Kandidaten mit TinEye überprüft hast! Gleich vier Treffer – da hat sich wieder gezeigt, dass man das auf jeden Fall machen sollte. Ich muss zugeben, dass ich das glatt vergessen habe … (Dafür habe ich wenigstens drangedacht, die Bilder mit den Siegern und Trostpreisgewinnern vom Vorjahr zu vergleichen, und auch da gab es prompt einen Treffer.)

Ich bin aber froh, dass viele der tollen Festival-Fotos OK zu sein scheinen, jedenfalls gibt es keine TinEye-Treffer für sie. Überhaupt kommt mir dieses Jahr sowohl die durchschnittliche Qualität der Einsendungen als auch die Qualität der Bilder in der letzten Runde besser vor als letztes Jahr – wir haben jetzt so einige „Hingucker“ auf National Geographic- oder Geo-Niveau dabei. (Und wir hätten noch mehr, wenn die Leute ihre Nachbearbeitung etwas verbessern würden. Schade, dass es daran oft scheitert.) Jedenfalls herzliche Grüße, Roman / --Aristeas ([[User talk:Aristeas|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:37, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Roman, Dank auch dir. Die eingereichten Fotos waren in der Tat besser als letztes Jahr. Bildbearbeitung ist eben zeitaufwändig und erfordert ja auch Übung. Bei den Videos und Audios war meiner Meinung nur Schrott dabei. Wenn davon einige gekürt werden sollten kann man die kaum vorzeigen. Das war letztes Jahr besser. Herzliche Grüße zurück, Reinhold /--Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:38, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Hallo Reinhold, danke für die Antwort! Was die Videos und Audios angeht, kann ich Dir nur beipflichten. Die Frage ist jetzt, wie man die Ausschreibung des Wettbewerbs auslegt. Am sinnvollsten fände ich es, gar keinen Preis bei Videos und Audios zu vergeben. Falls man die Formulierung „Best Video prize and best Audio prize“ allerdings so versteht, dass sie garantiert, dass auf jeden Fall je ein Preis verliehen werden soll, dann müssen wir eben das Beste unter den Schlechten finden ;–). (Daher habe ich die Videos und Audios doch bewertet, wenn auch nur unter Zähneknirschen.) Ich schreibe mal eine Mail an Joy Agyepong, der ja die Organisation koordiniert, und frage ihn, was er meint … Herzliche Grüße nochmals, Roman / --Aristeas ([[User talk:Aristeas|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:43, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:13, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:10, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

File:AKW Grafenrheinfeld-20100912-RM-165921.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Magnolia677 ([[User talk:Magnolia677|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:37, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2021 - March - Electricity/Winners

Template:Photo Challenge Silver -- Jarekt ([[User talk:Jarekt|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:08, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Calendula's photo

Dear Mr Reinhold,

I would like to use your beautiful photo of Calendula. Could I?

Photo would be use by a magzine name "Doradca" or another polish newspaper.

Unless you permit you will write an e-mail to me. karolina.kalinowska@onet.eu

I promise always put your name under picture.

Yours faightfully Karolina Kalinowska Template:UnsignedIP2

Of course.--Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:50, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:01, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Question

Hello! Can I use a snippet of your code? No-new-version | Knopik-som ([[User talk:Knopik-som|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:23, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

No problem. I got that from somone myself.--Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:31, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:07, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Nutzung Ihres Bildes

Lieber Herr Möller,

ich möchte mich erkundigen, ob Sie damit einverstanden wären, wenn ich Ihr Bild der Mühle aus dem Cloppenburger Museumsdorf in ein Hochkantformat bringe und in meinem Buch "Glücksorte in Oldenburg" unter Nennung Ihres Namens, verwende?

Ich würde mich sehr über Ihre Rückmeldung freuen.

Herzliche Grüße

Sabine Müller Template:Unsigned2

Hallo Sablne Müller, bin damit einverstanden. Freut mich wenn meine Bilder gefallen. Dnke für die Info und Beste Grüße RM--Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:46, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:09, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:01, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:02, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Missvain ([[User talk:Missvain|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:14, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Kraftwerk Wallsee-Mitterkirchen 01 - DJI 0060.jpg

Hallo Reinhold, danke für Deinen Review auf QIC. Wenn ich Dich richtig verstehe, sollten die vertikalen Linien im Bild auch tatsächlich etwa vertikal sein. Derzeit fallen sie auf der linken Bildseite gegen der Uhrzeigersinn und auf der rechten Bildseite im Uhrzeigersinn. Das nennt man wohl perspektivische Verzerrung (?). Mit welchem, möglichst kostenlosen, Programm kann ich das korrigieren? Schöne Grüße aus Niederösterreich! -- Hans Koberger ([[User talk:Hans Koberger|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:57, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Hab schon ein wenig recherchiert und GIMP samt einer Anleitung zum Entzerren gefunden. Ich versuch es mal. -- Hans Koberger ([[User talk:Hans Koberger|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:23, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

War nicht recht zufrieden mit GIMP und hab mir Affinity Photo zugelegt. Die Vertikalen hab ich etwas korrigiert. Grüße, -- Hans Koberger ([[User talk:Hans Koberger|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:08, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Hans, das ist schon besser. Die Wände der Gebäude sollten aber senkrecht sein. Allerdings wird das ab einer gewissen Gimbal Neigung schwierig, wie in diesem Fall. Um das Bild richtigzustellen ist die Kamera zu dicht dran. Ich hab versucht das zu korrigieren aber das ist unmöglich. Ansonsten ist das Bild beeindruckend. Ich wink das mal durch vielleicht klappt das. Ich selbst fliege eine Air 2 S und arbeite mich gerade ein.--Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:03, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Hab seit ein paar Wochen auch die Air 2 S :) und bin sehr zufrieden damit. Die Möglichkeiten, die man mit Luftaufnahmen hat, sind beeindruckend. -- Hans Koberger ([[User talk:Hans Koberger|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:46, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Template:Photo Challenge Silver -- Jarekt ([[User talk:Jarekt|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:12, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Nutzung eines Bildes

Hallo Herr Möller,

als Familie bringen wir eine Zeitschrift heraus. Sie heißt Schöpfung pur und befasst sich mit Staunenswerten aus Gottes Schöpfung. Die Auflage liegt derzeit bei 750.

Sehr gerne würde ich Ihr Fot vom Russischen Bären nutzen.

Möchten Sie ein Belegexemplar?

Herzliche Grüße

Sabine Klein Template:Unsigned2

Hallo Sabine Klein, vielen Dank für die Info. Ein Exemplar wäre bestimmt interessant für mich.

LG von RM--Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:41, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Emporenbilder Alladorf

 
Kindermord oder Urteil Salomos?

Hallo Reinhold,

ich habe mir gestattet, noch bei weiteren Deiner schönen Aufnahmen der Emporenbilder aus der evangelische Filialkirche in Alladorf Kategorien für die dargestellten Szenen/Figuren zu ergänzen, damit man sie besser findet. Das ist ein recht interessantes Bildprogramm, weil es auch diverse weniger oft dargestellte Szenen aus dem Alten Testament enthält. (Daher bin ich mir auch bei 3 Bildern nicht sicher, was sie darstellen. Ich werde mal meine Frau fragen, ob sie eine Idee hat – als Pfarrerin müsste sie das ja eigentlich wissen ;–).

In einem einzigen Fall würde ich eine Alternative zu der von Dir bereits vorgenommenen Identifikation vorschlagen. Bei diesem Bild könnte es sich statt um die Anordnung des Bethlehemischen Kindermords auch um das Urteil Salomos handeln – dazu würden die 2 dargestellten Frauen passen, und das würde v.a. besser in die Reihenfolge der Bilder passen. Was meinst Du?

Herzliche Grüße von Roman / --Aristeas ([[User talk:Aristeas|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:05, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Roman, so bibelfest bin ich leider nicht das ich die Szenen ohne weiteres deuten könnte deshalb bin ich für jede Hilfe dankbar. Ich habe absolut nichts dagegen wenn du die Beschreibung oder den Titel änderst oder hinzufügst. Den Namen des Künstlers konnte ich bisher nicht in Erfahrung bringen wenn es denn ein Profi war? Mir sieht das eher aus wie naive Malerei des 1800 Jahrhunderts. In der Nachbarkirche habe ich nochmal ungefähr die gleiche Anzahl scheinbar vom selben Schöpfer fotografiert. Beste Grüße von Reinhold --Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:48, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Hallo Reinhold, danke für Deine Antwort! Ja, ich würde auch eher auf einen naiven Maler tippen, nicht auf einen Profi. Oder es war eben ein „günstiger“ Maler, damals gab es (wenn ich mich recht erinnere) auch reisende Maler, die für Kost und Logis mal kurz die Kirche verschönerten oder ein Porträt malten. — Aber ich finde seinen Stil irgendwie ganz lustig und dank Deiner scharfen Aufnahmen kann man sogar die Pinselführung studieren. Außerdem hat mir gefallen, dass die Szenenauswahl (wie gesagt) teilweise ein bisschen ungewöhnlich ist; den Suizid Sauls etwa habe ich noch nicht so oft gemalt gesehen. Darum habe ich mich um die Kategorien gekümmert.
Ich ändere/ergänzen noch ein paar weitere Kategorien. Herzliche Grüße — Roman / --Aristeas ([[User talk:Aristeas|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:39, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:01, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Photo use

I have used your photo of the Asiatic dayflower as a decorative element in a private letter to a colleague of mine, giving you credit for the photo and citing that it was found on Wikipedia.

Ayse Adams Template:UnsignedIP2

Thanks for the info.--Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:57, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Tip(p) zum Umbenennen von FPs

Hallo Reinhold,

nur ein kleiner Tip(p): Wenn Du ein Featured Picture umbenennst, funktioniert der automatische Link zur Seite mit der Nominierung und Abstimmung nicht mehr. Die Lösung ist, auf der Bildbeschreibungs-Seite beim Template:Tl-Template einen neuen Parameter com-nom=(alter Dateiname) einzufügen, so wie z.B. hier. Dann wird der Link wieder richtig anzeigt.

Bitte nicht missverstehen: Ich schreibe Dir das nicht, um Dich anzumeckern, sondern wirklich nur als Tip! Da Du sehr viele FPs hast, könnte dieser Fall ja öfter vorkommen, sodass Du das wahrscheinlich gleich selbst wieder reparieren möchtest.

Herzliche Grüße, Roman / --Aristeas (talk) 13:28, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Roman, du bist der letzte von dem ich mich angemeckert fühlen würde. Für diesen Tipp bin ich sehr dankbar weil mir schon öfter aufgefallen ist das die Verlinkung nach der Umbenennung nicht mehr stimmt. Da ich aber mit der Suche nach (für mich) zeitfressenden Lösungen eher träge bin werde ich mich in Kürze an die Korrektur der Links machen. Nochmal vielen Dank.--Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:08, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Hallo Reinhold, vielen Dank für Deine Antwort! Die gute Nachricht ist, dass Du derzeit gar nichts machen musst: es gibt offenbar keine FPs mit kaputten Links bzw. diese wurden schon von anderen hilfreichen Händen repariert. Wenn ich das richtig verstehe, müssten alle FPs mit kaputten Nominierungs-Links automatisch in dieser Kategorie aufgeführt werden (bzw. hier oder hier). Wenn diese Kategorien leer sind, sollten alle Links OK sein. Du kannst aber, wenn Du das nächste Mal ein FP umbenennst, gleich den oben beschriebenen neuen Parameter com-nom=(alter Dateiname) einfügen, dann ist die Sache sofort repariert. Herzliche Grüße, Roman / --Aristeas (talk) 10:16, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:04, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Authorization to use one of your pictures (Commelina communis)

Hello Mr Moller, I am Joe Baillo, a musician from Brazil and I would like to kindly ask for your permission to use your picture (Commelina communis) on the logo of the new musical project that I have with a friend, Leon Mantovani (mind you, he is also a touring musician, he is from the Cubatao Orchestra, here in Brazil). This new project is called KAWI, which means Flower of the Language and we mix many musical genres, such as Rock, Reggae, Chill and Classical. Since we are a Duo, I was looking for a 2 Petal flower and came across your beautiful picture. I noticed you pre-authorized people to use it, however I thought it would be even better ask for your permission.

Best Regards Joe Template:Unsigned2

Hy Joe, thanks for the info and a lot of success, best --Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:21, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Use of Brügge Beginenhof Narzissen-20140322-RM-131414.jpg for TheTravel.com

Hello,

I'm writing to inform you and ask your permission to use your photo of daffodils in Bruges, Belgium in an article I'm writing for TheTravel.com. You can read some of my articles to get an idea of what this article will be like here: https://www.thetravel.com/author/dora-nuss/. I will credit you in the caption and provide a link to the CC license. Please email me if you don't want me to use your photo for this purpose: dnussw@gmail.com. Thank you for sharing your work!

Regards, Dora Template:UnsignedIP2

Thanks for the info.--Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:04, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:08, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:11, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Congratulations!

Hi Reinhold, congratulations for your more than 10.000 quality images! :) Have a nice evening! Tournasol7 ([[User talk:Tournasol7|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:27, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you Christoph . For you, the goal is not far away either. I like your pictures very much. Very good, constant, high quality work. Greetings from --Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:33, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Gratulation!

… zu den verdienten Plätzen 1, 3 und 8 bei WLE 2021/DE in der Kategorie „Detailaufnahmen“, den Plätzen 2 und 4 bei den „Landschaftsaufnahmen“ und den weiteren Plätzen! Ich habe gerade erst gesehen, dass das Ergebnis da ist. Du hast mit den Drohnenaufnahmen Deine fotografischen Möglichkeiten ja nochmals erweitert, und zwar (finde ich) sehr erfolgreich: für die Heidelandschaften usw. ist das eine ideale Darstellungsweise. Auch sonst sind die Ergebnisse schön und kommen mir dieses Jahr ausgewogener vor als letztes Jahr. (Ich habe nur wenige Bilder beigesteuert, da ich kaum zum Fotografieren gekommen bin, und freue mich, dass ich trotzdem ein paar Fotos unter die Top 100 gebracht habe.) Herzliche Grüße und alles Gute, Roman / --Aristeas (talk) 15:38, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Lieber Roman vielen Dankǃ Bin selbst über die hohe Platzierung überrascht denn es waren doch viele gute Bilder dabei und ich war nicht ganz sicher ob die mit dem 1 Zoll Sensor der Drohne gemachten Aufnahmen qualitativ ausreichend sein würden. An dich auch einen herzlichen Glückwunschǃ Deine Weinberge waren viel erfolgreicher als meine ː-) Mal sehen was ich für WLM zusammenbringe. Die Luft bietet unzählige neue Möglichkeiten die alle noch genutzt werden wollen. --Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:26, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Hey Jungs... hört ihr mal auf, euch gegenseitig zu gratulieren... ich bin noch nicht fertig mit dem Anschreiben von euch Siegern!
Nee, ohne Quatsch. Nun auch noch mal hier von mir herzliche Glückwünsche zu euren tollen Fotos. Ihr habt beide wirklich tolle Bilder abgeliefert. Liebe Grüße --Z thomas 19:37, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Tiefenellern Ellernbach Schlucht 17RM1588-PSD.jpg used for my uploads

Hello, I want to inform you that the picture taken by you is used for my three images (🔞 not safe for work): A Spreading Danger in the Forest.png, A Squirting Danger in the Forest.png, and A Soaked Danger in the Forest.png. They are all given complete credits and shared via CC-BY-SA 4.0. Anyway, thank you for the quality picture. 🐱💬 09:41, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:37, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:38, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:35, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:02, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:11, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Balloon Flower Koons 1020206.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Filetime ([[User talk:Filetime|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:54, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:11, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:35, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Using your pic

Hi, I'm using your pic to include in my homework in college. Thanks for your commons license to the community. Lector78 ([[User talk:Lector78|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:50, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:36, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2021

  Template:Clear Hallo Ermell,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2021 findet zum elften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit über zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Im Herzen Deutschlands in Thüringen und in Niedersachsen sind neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die auf Fotos warten. Übrigens in der Hauptstadt Thüringens in Erfurt findet dieses Jahr die WikiCon vom 1. bis 3. Oktober statt. Dies könnte man mit einem Foto-Kurzurlaub vor der WikiCon in Thüringen verbinden …

Vor dem Hintergrund der Flutkatastrophe 2021 haben wir auch drei Sonderpreise ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die Kulturdenkmale zeigen, die zerstört wurden. Das Foto kann das Objekt vor oder nach der Zerstörung zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 18:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:38, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:40, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:01, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:35, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:40, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:38, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2021 - July - Framing/Winners

Template:Photo Challenge Bronze -- Jarekt ([[User talk:Jarekt|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:29, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:36, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:39, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

QI Review

Moin! Danke für das Review von File:Hamburg Moorburg Kirche St. Maria-Magdalena 10.jpg. Meinst Du mit den "Spots" die drei oder vier hellen Flecken im Himmel? Die habe ich gesehen, war mir aber nicht sicher, ob es reale Dinge (Wolken, Vögel...) sind oder nicht. Die könnte man wohl recht einfach entfernen. Würde es sich Deiner Ansicht nach lohnen? Danke und Gruß --Dirtsc ([[User talk:Dirtsc|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:10, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Ja die sind mir aufgefallen. Erst hab ich an Regentropfen gedacht aber das kann glaube ich nicht sein. Würde ich entfernen stören aber nicht.Gruß zurück --Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:14, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Nein, Regen ist an dem Tag unmöglich gewesen. Es könnten nur Wolkenfetzen oder Vögel sein. Ich nehme die mal morgen raus, dann habe ich ein besseres Gefühl mit dem Bild. Gruß --Dirtsc ([[User talk:Dirtsc|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:41, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:36, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:40, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:42, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Ihr Blumen-Bild

Guten Tag Herr Möller

mein Name ist Simone Sonnentag und ich mache Kunst Mitmach Videos für Kinder. Aktuell arbeite ich an einem Video für die Kulturmäuse in Kooperation mit der LAG Bochum.

Ich hoffe sie bekommen diese email. In meinem Video Blumen malen nach Georgia O Keese würde ich gerne ihr Bild verwenden. Allerdings wird dieses Video auf YouTube öffentlich zugänglich veröffentlicht. Und ich würde gerne auf meinem social media Kanälen auch gerne Werbung für dieses Video machen.

Sie schreiben in ihrer Beschreibung dass man ihr Bild nicht verwenden darf. Das finde ich sehr schade. Können sie mir hier weiterhelfen. Ich würde mich freuen, wenn ich meinen Follower ihr schönes Bild präsentieren könnte- Mein Youtube Kanal heißt "Kunst mit Simi" und ich würde mich freuen, wenn sie einmal reinschauen.


Viele herzliche Grüße Simone Sonnentag Template:UnsignedIP2

Hallo Simone Sonnentag, meine Bilder dürfen alle unter der angegebenen Lizenz verwendet werden. Einfach nur deutlich machen das das Bild von mir ist Da reicht die Namensnennung schon aus. Ausnahme ist nur die direkte Verwendung auf Facebook da dort eigene, schlechtere Lizenzbedingungen gelten. Habe mir ihren Kanal angeschaut und finde ihn ausgezeichnet. Beste Grüße Reinhold Möller --Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:35, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:37, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:38, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:35, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:39, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Noch eine FP-Nominierung und Grüße

 
Great!

Hallo Reinhold,

ich habe mir erlaubt, genau wie der Kollege eine Burgen-Luftaufnahme von Dir als FP zu nominieren, und zwar in meinem Fall die wunderbare Sonnenuntergangs-Aufnahme der Altenburg; die Nominierung ist hier. Ich hoffe, das ist OK ;–). Ich habe das Foto zufällig beim neugierigen Blättern in den diesjährigen WLM-Bildern gesehen und dachte sofort: Das muss nominiert werden. Sicher wird irgendjemand an irgendwelchen Kleinigkeiten (Rauschen usw.) herummäckeln, aber ich finde die Aufnahme nicht nur kompositorisch und atmosphärisch perfekt, sondern selbst im Detail technisch sehr gut, erstaunlich für den kleinen Sensor, besonders wenn man die schwierige Gegenlicht-Situation bedenkt.

Überhaupt viele Grüße und Dank für Deine WLM-Fotos; wie immer sind alles sehr gute und interessante Aufnahmen und viele sind einfach wunderbar. Ich hoffe, dass die Vorjury nicht allzu viele hinauswirft (jedes Jahr beobachte ich, dass sie leider gerade einige der besten Fotos herabwertet, warum auch immer) und dass Du auch im Finale = Top 10 und 100 den verdienten Erfolg hast.

Herzliche Grüße, Roman / --Aristeas (talk) 09:40, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Vielen Dank lieber Roman für die Nominierung, das ist natürlich immer OK. Das Bild ist noch aus der Flugübungsphase nachdem ich den Flieger neu erworben hatte. Einfach faszinierend den "Standpunkt" in kurzer Zeit wechseln zu können. Ich hatte zuerst die DJI mini mit dem 1/2 Zoll Sensor und musste aber einsehen das bei der die Qualität nicht ausreicht. Was WLM angeht wird schon irgendwas dabei herauskommen. Ein bisschen Glück ist immer dabei. Ich bin mir sicher das du auch dieses Jahr wieder ganz vorne mitspielst. Gute Bilder werden sich immer durchsetzen. Nochmals vielen Dank.--Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:30, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Hallo Reinhold, danke Dir! Es tut mir allerdings leid, dass ich Dich mit der Nominierung sozusagen unter „Zugzwang“ gesetzt habe. Das wollte ich natürlich nicht! Bei diesem Foto war ich mir eigentlich sicher, dass es ohne Nachbesserungen durchkommt. Aber dann war prompt die erste Rückmeldung etwas kritisch, und alle weiteren Kommentatoren haben den „Fehler“ dann eben auch gesehen. Wie jemand anderes mir mal schrieb, FP-Nominerungen sind immer auch ein bisschen Lotteriespiel – manchmal werden offensichtliche technische Probleme nicht gesehen, manchmal stürzen sich alle auf irgendeine winziges Problem. Seltsam, aber so ist es. – Was die Korrektur angeht: ich habe mal probehalber in Photoshop bei der Farbbalance den Regler Magenta – Grün um ca. 10% richtung Magenta verschoben und fand das Ergebnis ganz gut. Ein ähnliches Ergebnis müsste es geben, wenn Du (wie von King of Hearts vorgeschlagen) beim Entwickeln der Raw-Datei den Farbabalance-Regeler Magenta-Grün etwas richtung Magenta verschiebst. Herzliche Grüße, --Aristeas (talk) 08:20, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Das macht nichts. Viel Augen sehen mehr als meine zwei. Da das RAW ziemlich dunkel ist war das keine einfache Arbeit. Ich habe jetzt die WB nochmal korrigiert und das Nachschärfen etwas reduziert. Beste Grüße.--Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:49, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:12, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:38, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotedUploader /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:37, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotedUploader /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:01, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:36, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:38, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:38, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:46, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Commons Photographers meeting on October 30th

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm happy to invite you to our next virtual meeting next Saturday,  October 30. This time, our colleagues User:Dey.sandip from India and User:Ermell from Germany will talk about their work.

If you're interested in joining this meeting, please sign up on the page below:

I'm very much looking forward to this event and I hope you'll be able to join.

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg ([[User talk:Frank Schulenburg|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:37, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Commons Photographers User Group: first board election

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

In preparation of the first board election of our group, I invite you to take a look at the following page:

and provide feedback. I've listed a number of positions for our first board and I've also outlined a possible timeline for the elections. The current plan is to open the self-nomination process up on November 15 and then have the election start on December 1.

I'm super excited to get this going and I'm very much looking forward to hearing from you. Please use this talk page for your thoughts.

I hope you're safe and well, and I wish you all the best! --Frank Schulenburg ([[User talk:Frank Schulenburg|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:56, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:07, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

  int:wikilove-barnstar-original-title
nice Photo! Charlie fong ([[User talk:Charlie fong|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:11, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you!

I have uploaded your lovely photo of Big Ben - with attribution - at: https://www.climatecrisisanthem.com/lyrics.html Template:Unsigned2

Thanks for the info.--Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:09, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:07, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2021 - September - COA/Winners

Template:Photo Challenge Bronze -- Jarekt ([[User talk:Jarekt|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:45, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Discussion at QIC talk page

A discussion is being held here, over the reviewing process at QIC and the possibility of improving our Image Guidelines. As a regular contributor to the project, your opinion would be most welcome and valued. Alvesgaspar ([[User talk:Alvesgaspar|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:36, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:07, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:55, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

File:Falsbrunn Kirche Innen-20210822-RM-152651.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Gnom ([[User talk:Gnom|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:48, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Reinhold, bitte entschuldige den Ärger mit deinem Foto. Der Altaraufsatz ist leider urheberrechtlich geschützt, da bräuchte es eine Freigabe. Falls du mit dem Künstler deswegen in Kontakt treten möchtest, kann ich dich gern unterstützen. --Gnom ([[User talk:Gnom|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:16, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Hallo Gnom, verstehe. Ich hab versucht den Künstler ausfindig zu machen was mir bisher nicht gelungen ist. Ich muß da wohl mal anrufen. Ansonsten ist das auch nicht so wichtig. Danke für die Info.--Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:38, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Commons Photographers elections: self-nomination phase is open

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

The self-nomination phase for the first board election of our group is open as of today. If you'd like to take on a more active role and take our user group to the next level, please consider running for one of the open positions. Please check out the Board Election 2021 page for more details.

I hope you, your family, and your friends are doing well. All the best! --Frank Schulenburg ([[User talk:Frank Schulenburg|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:40, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:59, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:56, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:57, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

635CSi

Hallo Ermell, wie gewünscht zur Info: ich habe von Deinem Bild File:BMW 635 CSi (E24) 6170176 (cropped).jpg ein Derivative Work gemacht. Viele Grüße, Pittigrilli ([[User talk:Pittigrilli|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:09, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:05, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:07, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:00, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Board election: voting is open!

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

The voting phase for our group's board election starts today. Please consider casting your vote. Voting ends on December 17.

I wish you all the best for the rest of the year 2021. Stay safe and healthy! --Frank Schulenburg ([[User talk:Frank Schulenburg|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:04, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:01, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:57, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:00, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:12, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:03, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:01, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Template:Photo Challenge Bronze -- Jarekt ([[User talk:Jarekt|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:11, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:07, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:15, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:10, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:10, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Hinweis: Datum leer

Hallo Reinhold,

nur als kleiner Hinweis: mir ist gerade aufgefallen, dass bei manchen (allen?) Deiner neueren Fotos das Feld Date = innerhalb der Template:Tl-Vorlage leer ist (z.B. bei diesem Bild). Ich nehme mal an, dass das keine Absicht ist (das Aufnahmedatum steht zwar auch in den EXIF-Daten und in den Kategorien, aber die Anzeige in der Template:Tl-Vorlage ist doch ganz sinnvoll). Kann es sein, dass da bei den Einstellungen für LrMediaWiki etwas durcheinandergekommen ist?

Herzliche Grüße von Roman / --Aristeas (talk) 16:22, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Roman, das Feld habe ich extra leer gelassen, da manchmal ein anderes Datum als das der Aufnahme dort eingetragen wurde. Ich bin nicht so ganz dahinter gekommen wie das passieren kann aber wenn das wichtig ist kann ich ja mal etwas Zeit investieren um das rauszufinden. Beste Grüße von Reinhold--Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:05, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Hallo Reinhold, jetzt verstehe ich das besser. Hm, ich denke, dass das Datums-Feld schon vermisst werden könnte, weil viele Leute erst mal in der Ausgabe der Template:Tl-Vorlage nach dem Datum suchen. Wenn Du also dahinterkommen würdest, was das Problem war, wäre das meiner Meinung nach schon gut. Falls es tatsächlich ein Problem mit LrMediaWiki ist, kann Dir ja vielleicht einer der anderen Fotografen hier, die dieses Werkzeug verwenden, sagen, welche Einstellungen er verwendet – das könnte hilfreich sein. (Ich verwende LrMediaWiki nicht, daher kann ich leider nichts dazu sagen.) Aber gute Fotos machen und hochladen ist natürlich wichtiger, daher vor allem: Gut Licht! und herzliche Grüße, --Aristeas (talk) 18:22, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:00, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Photo permission

Hi, I would like to use your photo https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Marienk%C3%A4fer_und_Puppe_6290099_PSD.jpg for our website https://scilog.fwf.ac.at and Social Media under the mentioned conditions.

Cheers, Ingrid Ladner, Editor scilog

Gladly. Exceptionally also in the social media, although I usually refuse for reasons of copyrights barbarism.--Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:34, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Herzliche Grüße

 
Weihnachtskrippe in Weil der Stadt

Lieber Reinhold,

ich möchte Dir ganz herzlich frohe Weihnachten, erholsame Feiertage, viele schöne Momente und einen guten Rutsch ins neue Jahr wünschen!

Vielen Dank für Deine wunderschönen Fotos, die viel dazu beitragen, Commons zu einem wertvollen Bildarchiv machen, und Deinen liebenswürdigen Umgangston, der ebenso viel dazu beiträgt, Commons zu einem angenehmeren und freundlicheren Ort zu machen.

Ganz herzliche Grüße von

Roman / --Aristeas (talk) 16:31, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2021/2022!

    * Happy Holidays 2021/2022, BASEPAGENAME! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohe Weihnachten! Glückliches Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- Johann Jaritz talk 07:37, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

 

Happy holidays 2021/2022!

    * Happy Holidays 2021/2022, BASEPAGENAME! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:01, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

 

Template:-

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:11, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:01, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:13, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Ermell/Archive/2021".