User talk:Indeedous/2013

This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to this page.

QI reviewing

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi mate. Please make sure that when you're using QIvotehelper, you check that no one else has added a review previously - otherwise it adds a 2nd section which is invisible. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:57, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for your advice. I didn't like the tool when I tried it, now i know why! ;) I guess next time I will use the editor again... --Indeedous (talk) 19:42, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 23:57, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

completely meaningless

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

würde ich ja mit vollständig inhaltsleer übersetzen oder? ...Sicherlich ^talk 06:03, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Ich hab jetzt die ganze Zeit überlegt, was du damit eigentlich sagen willst, jetzt habe ich es glaub ich gefunden: Das hier? Meaningless kann man auch mit ausdruckslos, nichtssagend übersetzen, und genau das traf meiner Meinung nach auf den Dateinamen zu, da er nur einen Monat und die Stadt enthielt und in keiner Weise angab, was sich wirklich in dem Bild befindet. Der Dateiname Cottbus würde wohl auf alle 2170 Dateien in der Kategorie:Cottbus zutreffen. Das war auch in keiner Weise böse gemeint und ich gebe zu, ich hätte dich am Besten vorher kontaktieren sollen. Nur hab ich das inzwischen aufgegeben, weil die meisten Uploader die ich kontaktiert hab eh nicht mehr hier aktiv waren. --Indeedous (talk) 08:46, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

sorry, aber da steht nicht meaningless sondern completely meaningless - und wenn ich zwei weiter hochgucke: File:Maua St. Laurentius.jpg - ist aus der persepektive doch wohl mindestens genaus meaningless: aus dem dateinamen ist nicht erkennbar wann es aufgenommen wurde oder auf welches Maua es sich denn bezieht. "Ich fände es hübscher" und ich hätte es gern genauer; okay aber das ist nicht completely meaningless. und wenn man wie hier completely meaningless in not completely detailed umdeutet zu sehen ist ja nicht der ganze bahnhof sondern das gebäude dazu und aus welcher himmelsrichtung ist es aufgenommen usw. ...Sicherlich ^talk 10:05, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Ich denke, wir haben beide unseren Standpunkt klar gemacht und deshalb ist die Sache dann für mich auch erledigt. Ich werde mir Mühe geben, von dir hochgeladene Dateien ab sofort in Ruhe zu lassen. --Indeedous (talk) 15:53, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Wilhelm Burgdorf.jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Wilhelm Burgdorf.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 09:46, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Bundestagsabgeordnete

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Sammelst du vor der Neuwahl nochmal schnell Bilder ein, bevor sich was ändert? ;) Marcus Cyron (talk) 21:57, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Joa, also ich hab das schon immer mal wieder gemacht, wenn ich Lust hatte, aber nach 50 Fratzen ist die mir meistens erstmal wieder für ne Weile vergangen... Nur dachte ich vorhin, das jetzt mal ne gute Gelegenheit wäre, den Rest hochzuladen. Ich wusste, dass ich bis "S" schon gekommen war und jetzt hab ich festgestellt, dass einige von denen "neue" Bilder (von 2005 oder 2009 oder so) reingestellt haben und die müssen wir uns ja auch nicht entgehen lassen... Langsam lässt die Lust wieder nach, aber es sind nicht mehr viele :D --Indeedous (talk) 22:03, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Vielleicht hilft ja bei deiner Lust etwas, daß es nicht unbemerkt bleibt. Finde das Klasse! :) Marcus Cyron (talk) 22:14, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Danke :) Aber jetzt reichts trotzdem erstmal wieder, morgen schaff ich hoffentlich den Rest. Und dann kann ich ja nächste Woche wieder von vorn anfangen. -.- Mein Lieblingsbild kam übrigens heute vom Herrn Weinberg, der sich einfach mal einen gelben Punkt ins Gesicht gesetzt hat. Aber ich war jetzt auch erstens faul (wenn ich jedem die hässlichen Flecken aus dem Gesicht montieren müsste würde ich nie fertig werden) und zweitens krieg ich meinen frisch reparierten Laptop mit Photoshop erst nächste Woche wieder, bis dahin muss der alte Linux-Desktop-PC mit ohne viel Möglichkeiten herhalten. --Indeedous (talk) 22:28, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations, Dear Reviewer

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

If you use the helper-the scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-

Hi Indeedous, thanks for your application to be an image reviewer. The application has been removed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can review all kind of image licenses on Commons. Please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR

importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

You can also add {{User reviewer}} or {{User trusted}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 22:25, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much! --Indeedous (talk) 22:53, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Elisabeth Winkelmeier-Becker 2009.jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Elisabeth Winkelmeier-Becker 2009.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Lymantria (talk) 05:58, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

I don't agree, the file does have a source and there it is clearly published under the cc-by-sa-license. I think we had that discussion about these files often enough [1] [2] and I believe that it is not necessary to know the photographer if the parliamentary group declares, that they have the right to publish the image. (by the way, after the election they updated their homepage and now the photographer is given there.) --Indeedous (talk) 09:28, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Perhaps first look and then see if you need to revert my action. The image you link to is different from the image you uploaded. So IMHO it is not sufficiently sourced. Perhaps you should upload the current image shown when following your link. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 20:24, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Ok, I actually didn't notice the new image, that's why I made a mistake with the photographer. According to [3], the photographer is Klaus Mischka. But I promise that I took the photo from the given source cducsu.de and that the license was cc-by-sa 3.0 de on the day of the upload. Since that license can not be revoked, and doesn't expire if the image is removed from their official homepage, I still think that everything is correct, although you obviously can't check that. But you can't do that for most of the other images here on commons either. If you don't agree, feel free to start the regular deletion process, because I think that the community should discuss that. --Indeedous (talk) 16:05, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Maybe I should add, that I uploaded the pictures of the politicians before the recent federal election because some of them were likely to leave the parliament. And that's why they updated the list of MPs on cducsu.de and obviously changed some images on this occasion. And of course I uploaded her new image, could you please review it? :) --Indeedous (talk) 16:16, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Re: Be careful

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Indeed. I was copy all source, ale I didn't change laguage code. Thanks for notice and sorry for problem. Rzuwig^► 19:14, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

العربية ∙ català ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ română ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Indeedous,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Spain - Barcelona - Guardia Urbana - old1 (4380177949).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, I think that a lot of the images in category "Police patches of Spain" have copyright. Elisardojm (talk) 02:34, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Indeedous,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team