User talk:Jean-Pol GRANDMONT/Archive 13

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Maincy - Château de Vaux-le-Vicomte (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

duplicate-tagged

Hi Jean-pol, do you mind the duplicate-taggin of File:0 Venise, pluie dans la Fondamenta Riva Olio.JPG and File:0 Venise, Fondamenta Riva Olio.JPG or is it o.k. for you?

OK Turelio vous pouvez supprimer le fichier 0 Venise, pluie dans la Fondamenta Riva Olio.JPG|Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 15:09, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Grotte de Meudon

Bonjour, il y a sans doute une confusion dans le descriptif et dans les catégories du fichier Grotte de Meudon. Il s'agit bien de l'ancienne Grotte de Meudon (détruite en 1705) mais celle-ci était bel et bien située à Meudon et non pas à Vaux-le-Vicomte. Voir aussi Category:Grotte de Meudon. Je te laisse le soin de renommer et de rectifier ou bien de me mettre un mot sur ma page de discussion si tu préfères que je m'en charge. Bonne continuation. --Bohème (talk) 15:23, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Bubo virginianus - Grand-duc d'Amérique (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weird look on that owl's face, but image quality is pretty good! --Etaped 16:49, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Arras

Bonjour, pourriez-vous télécharger une photo du 12 rue Ronville moderne, où se trouvait la brasserie du grand-père maternel de Robespierre? Peut-être même un portrait de Jacques-François Carraut? Si vous ne pouvez pas chercher quelqu'un qui peut le faire? Merci!

Pouvez-vous le rechercher? Merci! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 95.245.233.160 (talk) 08:26, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

François de Robespierre

La tombe du père de Robespierre est située dans l'ancien cimetière de Salvatorkirche à Munich. Vous pensez pouvoir télécharger une photo? Peut-être même un portrait de lui? Si vous ne pouvez pas chercher quelqu'un qui peut le faire? Merci!

Pouvez-vous le rechercher? Merci! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 95.245.233.160 (talk) 08:27, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Botassart - Chapelle de l'Immaculée Conception (1)B&W.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Out of focus on the borders --Wilfredor 21:36, 21 April 2021 (UTC) done, thanks!!! --Ezarate 23:21, 21 April 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality.Although I must accept that I have a weakness with black and white photos, although details are lost when giving a lot of contrast, it also makes it look like an old photo --Wilfredor 13:50, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:0 Détachement du 3e Bataillon parachutiste défilant devant le roi - 21-07-1989.JPG

Copyright status: File:0 Détachement du 3e Bataillon parachutiste défilant devant le roi - 21-07-1989.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:0 Détachement du 3e Bataillon parachutiste défilant devant le roi - 21-07-1989.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:05, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Fayet-Ronaye - Village - JPG1.jpg

File:Fayet-Ronaye - Village - JPG1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lapkasse (talk) 15:41, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:27, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

File:0 St Georges à cheval - Albrecht Dürer - BRB Bruxelles - Mac's - Hornu.JPG

File:0 St Georges à cheval - Albrecht Dürer - BRB Bruxelles - Mac's - Hornu.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Goesseln (talk) 10:44, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Heritage Belgium 2021

Beste vriend van Wikimedia België, U hebt meegedaan met de fotowedstrijd. Gelieve het juryrapport te lezen. Helaas hebt u niet gewonnen. Toch hartelijk dank voor uw bijdrage; vanaf 1 juli kan u opnieuw deelnemen.

Cher ami de Wikimedia Belgique, Vous avez participé au concours photo. Veuillez lire le rapport du jury. Malheureusement, vous n'avez pas gagné. Cependant, merci beaucoup pour votre contribution; vous pourriez participer à nouveau à partir du 1er juillet.

Dear friend of Wikimedia Belgium, You have participated in the photo contest. Please read the jury report. Unfortunately you did not win. However, thank you very much for your contribution; you can participate again from July 1st. Geert Van Pamel (talk) 12:40, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Merci !

Bonjour Jean-Pol, très belle image que cette mosaïque de Ferrucci & Ligozzi : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:0_Le_Pape_Cl%C3%A9ment_VIII_Aldobrandini_-_Ateliers_m%C3%A9dic%C3%A9ens,_sur_un_projet_de_Jacopo_Ligozzi_(2).JPG

Belle image vraiment, à l'aspect étonnamment moderne, et je trouve que le cliché lui rend bien justice. Merci pour le partage !

Je viens de l'employer pour illustrer cet article sur Wikipédia que je souhaite faire « labelliser » prochainement si possible : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/L'Amour_victorieux

-- Frédéric — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frédéric-FR (talk • contribs) 22:19, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

File:0 Vincent Gonzague, duc de Mantoue - Frans Pourbus le Jeune (1).JPG

File:0 Vincent Gonzague, duc de Mantoue - Frans Pourbus le Jeune (1).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Antitumint4 (talk) 21:03, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

File:0 Vincent Gonzague, duc de Mantoue - Frans Pourbus le Jeune (2).JPG

File:0 Vincent Gonzague, duc de Mantoue - Frans Pourbus le Jeune (2).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Antitumint4 (talk) 21:04, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Pavement mosaic - Season bust - Pal. Massimo (Rome).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments rotation of image left blank spaces, see blue lines below and to the right of mosaic --Virtual-Pano 09:44, 16 March 2022 (UTC)) done --Ezarate 22:49, 16 March 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 09:57, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Category:Woods

Woods has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:52, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

File:0 Vaux-le-Vicomte - Chioné tuée d’une flèche soutenue par ses deux fils - T. Dubreuil et R. de la Planche.JPG

Bonjour @Jean-Pol GRANDMONT! cette image ne représente pas la fille de Borée, mas la fille de Dédalion. L'image doit être retirée de toutes les pages de wikipedia relatives à Chioné fille de Borée... Sabinettus (talk) 08:54, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Le TEXTE DESCRIPTIF de ma photographie ainsi que sa traduction en langue anglaise figurant Wiki Commons NE FONT NULLEMENT mention de la filiation de Borée. Si vous voulez faire changer les articles parus sur les articles de Wikipédia ou tout autre article, adressez-vous aux créateurs et aux modificateurs de ces articles.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:0_Vaux-le-Vicomte_-_Chion%C3%A9_tu%C3%A9e_d%E2%80%99une_fl%C3%A8che_soutenue_par_ses_deux_fils_-_T._Dubreuil_et_R._de_la_Planche.JPG Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 10:12, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

le TEXTE DESCRIPTIF est correct, mais ce fut une erreur d'insérer cette image dans les entrées relatives à chione fille de Borée.

viens à titre d'exemple:

https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chion%C3%A9_fille_de_Bor%C3%A9e&oldid=173570652

https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chion%C3%A9_fille_de_Bor%C3%A9e&oldid=173570652

ces modifications semblent avoir été apportées par vous...

Sabinettus (talk) 01:02, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Lobbes JPG05.jpg

File:Lobbes JPG05.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Le Leprechaun (talk) 19:17, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:0 'Mons' - M Capobianco - G Braun - F Hogenberg (1b).JPG

Copyright status: File:0 'Mons' - M Capobianco - G Braun - F Hogenberg (1b).JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:0 'Mons' - M Capobianco - G Braun - F Hogenberg (1b).JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:06, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Licence correcte demandée ajoutée Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 20:11, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

"Soumission des sarmates"

"Soumission des sarmates"

Dear Jean-Pol, do you have a reliable source for the attribution of this photograph to the Sarmatians? I see the Category name is only "Sarcofago dei barbari prigionieri (Pio-Clementino)", and I can't find a source confirming the attribution to the Sarmatians. Can you help me clarify if this attribution is subjective, or if it is supported in Academia? Thank you! पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 16:00, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Dear friend wikipedian,

I found this information on the spot at the time when I made this photograph (September 29, 2011) N.B. It should also be noted that the photograph dated April 3, 2010:File:Sarcofago con sottomissione dei sarmati, seconda metà del II secolo dc., inv. 942.JPG give the same description but this time in Italian. --Jean-Pol GRANDMONT Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 19:37, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! It does seem that this is what the museum label says, as yourself and several other Wikipedia photographers report the same name. What's more puzzling is that I cannot find any reliable published source making the same claim (I think they could as well, and probably more likely, be Scythians or Dacians as the known depictions of Sarmatians are quite different). Anyway, thanks for the info! पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 20:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)