User talk:Kallerna/2021

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de San Sebastián Cádiz 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 12:05, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metropol Parasol Plaza de la Encarnación 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 09:09, 29 December 2020 (UTC)  Comment Very interesting photo, possible FP, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 11:40, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canal de Alfonso XIII Torre del Oro Sevilla.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 09:10, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de España, Seville 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:48, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarifa panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 12:20, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bunkers de Tarifa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 12:21, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Banús 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The picture slopes down on the right side. --Ermell 23:19, 28 December 2020 (UTC)  Comment Fixed. --Kallerna 08:10, 29 December 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:20, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de España, Seville 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:17, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Faroese sheep Sumba 1.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Seat Tarraco / Quality images

Hey Kallerna, thank you for your comment concerning my pictures of the Seat Tarraco. I just brightened the picutres a bit. I think that it's ok now. Thanks in advance. Best wishes M 93 (talk) 22:39, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! They are still quite dark, IMO should be brightened more. —kallerna (talk) 07:12, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olive trees A-3176 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:43, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sierra Nevada Pradollano 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:43, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pantano San Rafael de Navallana 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:43, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olive trees A-3176 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Road CO-3406 to Obejo 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:51, 3 January 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality, could have been slightly better with base ISO and slower shutter speed. --Trougnouf 08:53, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sierra Nevada Borreguiles 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 08:54, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sierra Nevada Pradollano 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 22:49, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Road CO-3406 to Obejo 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:09, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sierra Nevada Borreguiles 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:09, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olive trees A-3176 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:09, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sierra Nevada Borreguiles 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 09:03, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sierra Nevada Pradollano panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama from Pradollano towards Granada 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 10:17, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Almodóvar del Río panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:22, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Poistopyyntö

Hei. Ehtisitkö jossain välissä poistaa tiedoston File:Kouvola Hämeen ratsurykmentin muistolaatta cropped.jpg? Suttasin sen päiväysleiman piiloon, mutta myöhemmin tein paremman version Inpaintilla. En nyt sitten pysty sitä lataamaan, koska järjestelmä väittää sen olevan täysi duplikaatti, joka ei pidä paikkaansa (toinen on käsintehty ja toinen koneellisesti). Kiitos.--Htm (talk) 19:32, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Moi! Poistin tiedoston, toivottavasti nyt onnistuu lataaminen. —kallerna (talk) 08:32, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Kiitos! Vaihdan vielä varmuuden vuoksi tiedostonimen... -Htm (talk) 11:56, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita-catedral de Córdoba interior 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 22:35, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita-catedral de Córdoba interior 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:05, 21 January 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower of the Mosque-Cathedral of Córdoba 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:58, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita-catedral de Córdoba interior 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:06, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Almodovar del Rio panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe the last frame is slightly tilted ccw. But overall good quality. --Milseburg 16:54, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita-catedral de Córdoba interior 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But: IMO it could be sharper. It looks like JPEG compression. --XRay 09:19, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo Almodovar del Rio panorama 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:38, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo Almodovar del Rio 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Right side looks good but the left side is leaning out --Poco a poco 17:48, 23 January 2021 (UTC) Some perspective correction added, maybe better now? --Kallerna 11:59, 24 January 2021 (UTC)  Support Indeed --Poco a poco 22:05, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo Almodovar del Rio panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 13:54, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita-catedral de Córdoba interior 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:11, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita-catedral de Córdoba interior 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:45, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo Almodovar del Rio 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 19:59, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Vicugna vicugna Salar de Chalviri.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons!

Dear Kallerna

Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.

After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a policy (available in many languages) that has been ratified by the Board of Trustees. We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. As a member of the functionary team of Wikimedia Commons, your opinion on enforcement is of great value. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so. There are a few enforcement questions so you can easily outline your answers based on them. Please do not hesitate to bring any more questions/challenges you think are not yet discussed.

The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.

As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.

Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Use of photo of Kittilä mine

Hi! I am currently producing a documentary on mining in Sweden and Finland and we would love to use your photo of Kittilä mine. Would that be possible? Best, G.B. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HansPeterMaulwurf (talk • contribs) 09:31, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Yes, like it is said in the copyright:

You are free:

to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work

to remix – to adapt the work

Under the following conditions:

attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original. —kallerna (talk) 18:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Please take a short survey regarding UCoC

Hello Kallerna,

I would like to inform you that we now have a survey in place to take part in the UCoC consultation. It is not a long one and should take less than 10 minutes to complete. You can take the survey even if you have already participated in the on-wiki consultation. It has a different set of questions and allows you to participate anonymously and privately.

As a member of the Commons functionaries, your opinion is especially essential. Please click here to participate in the survey.

You are still welcome to participate in the on-wiki discussions. If you prefer you can have your say by sending me an email. You can also drop me an email if you want to have a one-to-one chat.

Thank you for your participation! Wikitanvir (WMF) 13:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mount Zwegabin 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 14:34, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita-catedral de Córdoba interior 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:24, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita-catedral de Córdoba interior 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:24, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Córdoba aerial 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 22:14, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guarromán, Jaén.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 21:03, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olive orchards Córdoba.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 17:31, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rumblar reservoir 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. The description could include more details such as the location. The Category:Dams ... -- the image does not show the dam. Add more appropriate categories eg Reservoirs ... if possible. --Tagooty 04:49, 24 February 2021 (UTC) True, I recategorized the image. --Kallerna 20:20, 24 February 2021 (UTC) Good quality. --Tagooty 08:48, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adra aerial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:34, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alboloduy aerial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:26, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Arenoso reservoir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 14:35, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Uso de fotografías Almodóvar del Río

Buenas, Kallerna. En primer lugar, querría felicitarte por las magníficas fotos que has realizado de Almodóvar del Río y su castillo. Son espectaculares. Soy técnico de Cultura del Ayuntamiento de Almodóvar y nos gustaría usar alguna de tus imágenes en carteles de actividades culturales y folletos turísticos. ¿Sería posible? No entiendo muy bien los términos de la licencia CC BY-SA 4.0. ¿En impresión en papel sería suficiente con indicar, por ejemplo, "Fotografía de Kallerna (CC BY-SA 4.0) o debemos incluir algo más? Esperamos tu respuesta, y reiteramos nuestras felicitaciones por las espectaculares fotografías que tomaste en nuestro pueblo. Gracias y saludos.

Sebastián Sánchez — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 37.11.13.195 (talk) 22:54, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Gracias, you are free to use the photos! If you want to use credits, "Fotografía de kallerna, Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)" is fine. —kallerna (talk) 11:56, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andasol 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:56, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sierra de Almijara with Sierra Nevada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:56, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purullena aerial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:56, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Greenhouses near El Ejido.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:22, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sierra Nevada Zayas skilift 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 18:44, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sierra Nevada Laguna skilift 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 18:42, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sierra Nevada Pradollano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 18:43, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sierra Nevada Laguna skilift 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 18:43, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sierra Nevada Laguna de las Yeguas 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:09, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sierra Nevada Laguna skilift 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:18, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sierra Nevada Laguna de las Yeguas 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 01:41, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sierra Nevada Laguna skilift 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 09:00, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sierra Nevada Ski Station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Suggestive shot. Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 23:41, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villafranca de los Barros aerial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I like it --Mike1979 Russia 12:30, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sierra Crestellina aerial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support i like it --Mike1979 Russia 12:30, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Presa de Embalse de la Serena 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 10:33, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Planta Solar PS20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:24, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orellana la Vieja 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 08:41, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Natural Park Los Reales de Sierra Bermeja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 12:49, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Mejoral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 12:59, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belmez 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I like it --Mike1979 Russia 11:34, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embalse de Huesna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Pretty tight crop, anyway is ok for me. Composition and quality are good, thank you. --Lion-hearted85 23:46, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aznalcollar 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some info about the whole would lake would be good. --Ermell 21:28, 27 March 2021 (UTC) It's Aznalcollar mine. --Kallerna 09:51, 28 March 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Thank you. --Ermell 20:00, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Presa de Orellana La Vieja 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 23:58, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andasol Guadix 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 03:25, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Presa de Orellana La Vieja 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:26, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adra 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pozoblanco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 01:42, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monte Antelao 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:53, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pedroche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent quality, however, need a better image description, also could be good a geolocation --Wilfredor 21:36, 21 April 2021 (UTC) It's an aerial view of the town, what else is needed? --Kallerna 05:39, 22 April 2021 (UTC)  Info E.g. towards which direction was the image taken or where which parts of the town can be seen. --PantheraLeo1359531 10:12, 23 April 2021 (UTC) Quite clearly the whole town is in the image? --Kallerna 18:40, 24 April 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality, but it wouldn't hurt to say which way is up (e.g., is up to the south, northwest, or whatever?). Wilfredor and PantheraLeo1359531, please feel free to move this to consensual review. -- Ikan Kekek 19:25, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Hvannhagi 9.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Ejido aerial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, interesting composition. --Carsten Steger 18:04, 30 June 2021 (UTC)  Comment It would be great if geographic coordinates would be added to the image description page. --Carsten Steger 18:06, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cumulus clouds Andalucia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:57, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andasol Solar Power Station 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:57, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andasol Solar Power Station 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:01, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Haza del Trigo 4.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haza del Trigo 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The main subject of the image, the greenhouses, are very sharp. There is a small amount of field curvature visible in the image corners, which, in my experience, is difficult to avoid when taking aerial photographs through windows of small airplanes. The resulting blur is small enough that I do not find it distracting. Therefore, I support this image as a quality image. --Carsten Steger 17:54, 30 June 2021 (UTC)  Comment It would be great if geographic coordinates would be added to the image description page. --Carsten Steger 17:54, 30 June 2021 (UTC)  Info Thanks! I'll add the coordinates later in patches. --Kallerna 06:20, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adra aerial 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 13:00, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castell de Ferro and clouds over mountain Lújar 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 13:00, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Almuñécar aerial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 13:00, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orographic rain over Sierra Nevada, Alboloduy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 13:06, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embalse del Huesna aerial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 13:06, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Solnova Power Station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 12:48, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Circuito Monteblanco 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 13:06, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nerja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The sharpness could be better. Can you sharpen the image? --Carsten Steger 13:00, 6 July 2021 (UTC)  Info Used sharpening filter. Better now? --Kallerna 11:57, 8 July 2021 (UTC)  Support Thanks! Looks good to me now. --Carsten Steger 12:59, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Herradura aerial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:10, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gemasolar Thermosolar Plant 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:09, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Dog in Kuolojarvi 1.jpg

File:Dog in Kuolojarvi 1.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. A reason for the tagging has not been detected or none was placed. Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Salla Lapland.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 12:16, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Dog in Kuolojarvi 1.jpg

File:Dog in Kuolojarvi 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Salla Lapland (talk) 17:49, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lyhdynkantajat EM-asussa 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:34, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vaasa Barracks, Suomenlinna 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:40, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Allas Sea Pool 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 18:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SkyWheel Helsinki 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 18:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katajanokka Terminal 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 18:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stora Enson pääkonttori Katajanokka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 18:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Humalistonsilta 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suomen Joutsen 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 15:28, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalkkinen bridge 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:24, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karisalmi bridge 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hillopo2018 07:24, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paddleboard yoga.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:15, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sigyn docked in Turku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:26, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wärtsilä crane Turku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted CW. --Peulle 14:27, 21 July 2021 (UTC) Edited, maybe better now? --Kallerna 16:56, 21 July 2021 (UTC)  Support Yes (though the skewed water surface /which can't be avoided in this view/ is a little distracting). --Nefronus 08:33, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bore Turku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karisalmi bridge 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 17:18, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karisalmi bridge 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 17:18, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adra 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 19:31, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tampere aerial 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 19:16, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karisalmi bridge 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 18:41, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tampere aerial view 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:19, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tampere aerial view 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:19, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kangasala aerial 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:19, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lempäälä aerial 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 19:53, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aerial view Tampere 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:47, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kangasala aerial 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 19:48, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seututie 325 Pelisalmi 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:42, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karisalmi bridge 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 15:59, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Päijänne sunset.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tampere aerial view 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:49, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Photo "Flies on Leucanthemum vulgare.JPG"

Hello, I am working on a practical book on insects affecting horses. In our section on harmless insects we would like to include a photo of scatopsid flies, which are illustrated beautifully in your above-named photo. We would love to use your photo in the book but our publisher says that we can't use photos with SA licenses.

Would you be willing to allow us to use the photo without the SA feature? If so, how would you like the credit information to appear?

Thank you!

Chris Geden chris.geden@usda.gov Geden1954 (talk)

No problem, use of the photo is fine. Please credit Kalle Rahkola/Wikimedia Commons. —kallerna (talk) 05:34, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Presa de Embalse de la Serena 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:46, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Medina Piazza Umbrella.jpg

Hi Kallerna, what is your copyvio-rationale for this and the other similar images? --Túrelio (talk) 20:05, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Highly suspicious user. No edits, only uploaded photos, all taken with different cameras. Some of the photos even have copyright claims in the exif-data. Quite certain that the photos are not taken by the user, however, I did not want to delete the photos right away, needed another user to confirm my doubts. —kallerna (talk) 09:33, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Päijänne sunrise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sallilan voimalaitos 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:16, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sallilan voimalaitos 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:51, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sallilan voimalaitos 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:20, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andasol 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:24, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andasol 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 11:37, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pihlavanlahti Halssi 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 14:44, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaukaniemi, Kaukajärvi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please add geolocation --Wilfredor 23:45, 3 August 2021 (UTC) Added. --Kallerna 18:15, 4 August 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:10, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Käkisalmen silta 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:29, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalkkinen canal 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 13:21, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalkkinen canal 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 13:22, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lahti view 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:39, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flea market port of Lahti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:21, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lahti view 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:39, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sibelius hall Lahti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:13, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lahti sign.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:21, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Käkisalmen silta 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 14:37, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lahti view 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 12:23, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lahti Ski Jumping Hills 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 12:23, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Käkisalmen silta 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Stepro 13:01, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piano-paviljonki Lahti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:16, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sunset Asikkalanselkä 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:16, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soratie Kalkkinen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:16, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File:Vettisfossenvideo.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalkkinen canal 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Stepro 12:56, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paistetut ahvenet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Stepro 12:56, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lahti view 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:44, 22 August 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:01, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Käkisalmen silta 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 14:52, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Vesijärvi panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 13:48, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Käkisalmen silta 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:23, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haapasaari 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (IMO the categorization could be better.) --XRay 10:23, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OH-HMY 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:51, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iniö Church 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:00, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mossalan lossi 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:55, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Östern Nauvo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:55, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LA Elektra 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:55, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lahti Ski Jumping Hills 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Velvet 06:56, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Aura 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Fischer.H 17:14, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kivimon lossi 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Y.ssk 14:31, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Näsby harbour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Fischer.H 17:19, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ML Vikare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--MaedaAkihiko 02:20, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Antonia 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Y.ssk 18:17, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Houtskär Church 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Velvet 05:55, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nauvon satama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Velvet 06:32, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iniö Church 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:49, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LA Stella 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:49, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Antonia 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Velvet 06:35, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OH-HMY 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:40, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

FM Promotion

This file has been promoted to Featured media! The file File:Barrel roll 1.webm, which you nominated at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:Barrel roll 1.webm, has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another file, please do so.

/FeaturedMediaBot (talk) 21:00, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File:Barrel roll 1.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sallilan voimalaitos 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:20, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Chad Hugo

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:N.E.R.D_@_Pori_Jazz_2010_-_Chad_Hugo_2.jpg

The bassist in this picture looks like Dwayne Moore, who has toured a lot with N.E.R.D. and Pharrell Williams and was also in the lineup of N.E.R.D. in Pori.

https://historia.porijazz.fi/festivaalivuodet/2010/esiintyja/n-e-r-d-6801/

--Matthäus Gehägeberg (talk) 13:47, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

You are right, I'll change the info. —kallerna (talk) 15:14, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vampulan kirkko 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:13, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nurmo church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:51, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lakeuden risti sisältä 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:15, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lakeuden risti sisältä 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 17:43, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uudenkaupungin aittaranta 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:23, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaitainen bridge 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:23, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quarry Taivassalo 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:23, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quarry Taivassalo 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:12, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juselius Mausoleum 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:28, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalevanpuisto syyskuussa 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 13:08, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porin raatihuone 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:28, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalevanpuisto syyskuussa 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:04, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juselius Mausoleum 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:24, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of the Juselius Mausoleum 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:24, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pori Town Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:30, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juselius Mausoleum 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:32, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quarry Taivassalo 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:02, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tampereen Kansi ja uusi areena 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:31, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uutela Canal 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:53, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uutela Canal 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:53, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valkoposkihanhia Aurinkolahdessa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:47, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uutela Canal 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:12, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seinäjoki city centre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:14, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seinäjoki panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:14, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pig farm Vampula 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 14:07, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aurinkolahti beach panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:51, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uutela Canal 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:01, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wing delivery Vuosaari 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:57, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porvarinsilta 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porvarinsilta 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:05, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uutela Canal 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:05, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uutela Canal 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:05, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hämeenkatu Tampere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:19, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lohikallionranta 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:34, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uutela Canal 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aurinkolahti uimavalvontakoppi 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'd expect at least one category about the subject --Poco a poco 12:15, 3 October 2021 (UTC) Added. --Kallerna 15:43, 4 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pig farm Vampula 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:37, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pig farm Vampula 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --CuriousGolden 08:57, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tampereen juna-asema 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:17, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paulig Vuosaari roastery 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 11:30, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paulig Vuosaari roastery 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A few black dots/dust spots on the sky that should be removed. --Halavar 15:34, 5 October 2021 (UTC) Fixed. --Kallerna 18:04, 5 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --Halavar 21:12, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gatorade Center 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:09, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baltic Princess Airisto 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 13:33, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finnfellow Airisto 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 13:33, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gatorade Center 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --CuriousGolden 14:53, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gatorade Center 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:18, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TPS - Ilves 11.9.2021 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --CuriousGolden 08:02, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finnwave.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --CuriousGolden 08:02, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hämmärönsalmen lossi 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:27, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finnfellow Airisto 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --CuriousGolden 08:02, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reposaari takaranta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:44, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siikaranta Reposaari 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:44, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OH-LKO 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:44, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nokianvirta 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:53, 22 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 19:32, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isojärvi Pomarkku 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:48, 22 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 19:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nokianvirta 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:50, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Allas Sea Pool 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:08, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Greenhouses in Andalusia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:38, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nokianvirta 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:23, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vágar aerial view 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support This is nice. Quality is good and photo could have multiple uses. --GuavaTrain 22:27, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hvannhagi 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great! Not taken for granted having such good weather there. --Milseburg 10:53, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yyterin kylpylähotelli 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support – Good quality. --Hulged 15:49, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jigsaw puzzle solving 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:53, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017 and Wiki Science Competition 2019, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), but it's still open in almost all the other countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, that is "astronomy".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

---

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

---

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021

---

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--15:55, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tampereen kauppahalli 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:20, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tampere Orthodox Church domes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:20, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nokia Arena November 2021 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 15:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:08, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metsä Board Tako 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 19:15, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kauppakeskus Ratina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 14:54, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:04, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nokia Arena November 2021 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is some softness to the right, but overall I think it is still OK. --Argenberg 13:06, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nokia Arena November 2021 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Please indicate the direction from which this view is taken. --Tagooty 10:34, 25 November 2021 (UTC) Done. --Kallerna 12:51, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porin lentoasema 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 14:03, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Satakunnan keskussairaala 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --V.Boldychev 21:49, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nokia Arena November 2021 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:16, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pori aerial 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:16, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:59, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ratina Stadium 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The far left and right are a bit soft, but that's definitely not a problem with this resolution. Good quality for me. --Domob 11:25, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:56, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Nokia Arena November 2021 5.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nokia Arena November 2021 5.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nokia Arenan avajaiset 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yeriho 19:11, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MV Kaisa Hansa shipping Pärnu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:02, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valli Park Pärnu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:02, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bastionide rada Pärnu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:17, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pärnu muul 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:06, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Osman Sapian.jpg

Hi Kallerna! What is your copyvio-rationale for this and the other similar images?

Thank you.

--Hasrolhashim (talk) 07:43, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

The site where images are from is free-sourced, but the images themself are clearly copyright violations (low quality press photos copied from internet). —kallerna (talk) 08:23, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nokia Arenan avajaiset 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 09:55, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shwedagon Zedi Daw Yangon 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 11:25, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 December 2021 (UTC)