Open main menu
Busy desk.svg This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

العربية | Беларуская‎ | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | English | Español | Euskara | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Rômană | Русский | Simple English | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ATTENTION: Please use my talk page rather than emailing me.


Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic.

Deutsch | English | français | magyar | македонски | +/−

Please keep discussions together:

  • If I was starting a thread on your talk page, please answer there. I will watch your talk page.
  • If you started a discussion here on my talk page, I will answer here.

All requests for and notifications of re-use of my images on Commons have been moved to Requests & Notifications.

If you can't find a comment or an older discussion here, take a look whether it is in one of my archives:
Archive1 (latest), Archive2 (2007), Archive3 (2008), Archive4 (2009), Archive5 (2010), Archive6 (2011), Archive7 (2012), Archive8 (2013), Archive9 (2014), Archive10 (2015), Archive11 (2016), Archive12 (2017), Archive13 (2018).


File:Sunhild Kleingaertner.jpgEdit

Dear Túrelio,

two days ago you deleted the picture File:Sunhild Kleingaertner.jpg , uploaded by my client with the account "Leibniz-Institut für Maritime Geschichte" because of a copywright violation. Thank you for taking care, but in this case the accusation is wrong. My client is the owner of the picture and he uploaded it for free use. The website you found and linked as original source is the website of my client, who's also the owner of the picture you deleted: The DSM Museum is the Leibniz-Institut für Maritime Geschichte like its mentioned in the subheadline.

Kind regards,


— Preceding unsigned comment added by 35c63n (talk • contribs) 08:41, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Hallo 35c63n,
ich antworte mal auf deutsch, weil :de ja dein "Heimatprojekt" ist. Das Problem mit Nutzerkonten wie "Leibniz-Institut für Maritime Geschichte" ist, dass jeder beliebige so ein Konto eröffnen kann. Deshalb gibt es für institutionelle Nutzer seit einiger Zeit die Möglichkeit, das Nutzerkonto verifizieren zu lassen, wie es hier: de:Wikipedia:Benutzerverifizierung beschrieben ist. Falls du bzw. das "Leibniz-Institut für Maritime Geschichte" weitere Uploads planen, würde ich das unbedingt empfehlen. Falls nicht bzw. um das o.g. Portrait wiederherstellen zu lassen, sollte das Leibniz-Institut für Maritime Geschichte von seiner offiziellen Emailadresse an eine Mail schicken, in der bestätigt wird, dass das Institut entweder selbst der Urheber oder der Rechteinhaber an dem Portrait ist und zustimmt, dass es unter der gewählten freien Lizenz auf Commons verbreitet wird. (Falls der Urheber ein unabhängiger Fotograf ist, ist es Sache des Instituts im Innenverhältnis zu klären, ob er dafür seine Genehmigung gegeben hat). Wenn diese Mail abgeschickt ist, kannst du mir kurz eine Nachricht geben. --Túrelio (talk) 09:10, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio,

herzlichen Dank für deine schnelle Rückmeldung. Ich bin auf der Talk Seite auf solch einen Hinweis gestoßen und an meinen Kunden weitergegeben. Das Konto wurde inzwischen, wie aufgefordert, durch ein formloses Schreiben über eine offizielle E-Mail Adresse des Instituts verifiziert. Ich habe auch schon im Auftrag des Instituts eine Undeletion Request gestellt und die Sachlage aufgeklärt. Falls das Portrait infolgedessen nicht wieder hergestellt wird, gebe die Anleitung an den Auftraggeber und Rechteinhaber weiter. Ich danke für die Hilfe. Schöne Grüße!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 35c63n (talk • contribs) 10:10, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio,

falls du mein Edit zur letzten Nachricht nicht gesehen hast: Erstmal einmal vielen Dank für deine schnelle Rückmeldung. Ich hatte solch eine Info auch auf der User Page der Kundin gesehen und daraufhin schon drum gebeten, das Konto verifizieren zu lassen. Das ist auch direkt passiert. Ich weiß nicht wie lange die Bearbeitung nun dauern wird und ob das Portrait nun durch den von mir gestellten Undeletion Antrag wieder eingestellt wird; falls ich oder die Kundin als Urheberin das Foto erneut hochladen müssen, freue ich mich über eine kleine Nachricht.



— Preceding unsigned comment added by 35c63n (talk • contribs) 07:21, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

deleted the image G.C ChandrashekharEdit

Hi why is the image deleted ! uploaded for my client with the account "aralikatte" because of a copywright violation. Thank you for taking care, but in this case the accusation is wrong. My client is the owner of the picture and he uploaded it for free use. The website you found and linked as original source is the website of my client, who's also the owner of the picture you deleted:

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Aralikatte (talk • contribs) 07:06, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Aralikatte,
the website, which you had provided as source of the image, clearly states "Copyright ©2018 Team GC. All Rights Reserved". That is all what counts. You have to provide evidence that this image is under a free license (compliant with COM:L). Only the author/photographer can release an image under a free license. If your "client" is the legal rightsholder (obtained from the author) he has to send a statement of permission to --Túrelio (talk) 09:36, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi, My client will send the permission letter by EOD

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Aralikatte (talk • contribs) 11:05, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

statement of permission I hereby affirm that I, GC Chandrashekhar, am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of both the work depicted and the media I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

GC Chandrashekhar 2018-09-07

Aralikatte (talk) 00:26, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion reqEdit

Hi Túrelio, could you also delete the other corrupted images in this category: Category:Palio dela Brenta? Thank you! --Afnecors (talk) 09:49, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! --Afnecors (talk) 11:45, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Grant MacPherson 1Edit

Greetings, I am writing in regards to the article Grant MacPherson, who is the owner of The article for Wikipedia was strictly developed under his guidance and approval, for which Wikipedia can directly get in touch with him by going on or email him at He will clear any doubts that may have arisen since I have written the article under the username of RolexRay. The reason I said to directly contact Grant at for direct verification otherwise if you need me to submit any document I would be happy to do so. I totally respect the rules and policies of copyright infringements and abide by them.

Sincerely, Rolex Ray

5pm Pacific US time Sep 7th 2018

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rolexray (talk • contribs) 00:04, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
I assume you are refering to the deleted image File:Grant MacPherson.jpg, right? You claimed it to be your own work. If I understand your post corrected, said Mr. Grant MacPherson is the rightsholder? If that is so, then he needs to send a confirmation of his rightsholdership to . --Túrelio (talk) 08:40, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Please undeleteEdit

Category:Aircraft by operator by function was deleted without discussion. Bidgee (talk) 01:34, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

It had been speedy-nominated for "empty, unneeded, Aircraft by operator is a flat list, does not need sub-indices". Restored for now. --Túrelio (talk) 08:10, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, sadly Joshbaumgartner has used "Being Bold" for anything that is controversial and choosing not to discuss until after the fact. Bidgee (talk) 09:14, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

3 imagesEdit

Dear Turelio,

Please kindly review these images.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:39, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:14, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank You for your help Turelio. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:55, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

2 imagesEdit

Dear Turelio,

When you can, please review these 2 images from M.O.

Thank You for all your help. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:33, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Thank You for your reviews Turelio. Have a good day. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:46, 10 September 2018 (UTC)


Why do you ignore my comment at user talk:Dogad75 #File:Kaikov_Andrey.jpg? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:48, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

because I didn't see it, as it was likely posted after the deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 12:46, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Grant MacPhersonEdit

Greetings, I had posted an article under the name of Grant MacPherson that you had objections about under his company called ScotchMyst. I had requested to get in touch with him directly at, to rectify any misunderstandings that may have occurred, as I per the article I had posted. Kindly let me know what is the status on this query at your earliest.

Thank you,

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinhsb (talk • contribs) 16:46, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Rolex Ray

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rolexray (talk • contribs) 15:51, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi, please see User_talk:Túrelio#Grant_MacPherson_1. --Túrelio (talk) 19:09, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Creating File:Zwroty nieruchomości w Warszawie (1990-2016).pngEdit

and File:Reprywatyzacja - mapa zniszczeń.png

How can I prove that they are my works?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Niegodzisie (talk • contribs) 22:40, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Niegodzisie,
1) you need to provide information about the sources of the b/w background-images. None of them is likely your own work.
2) for the first image, you need to explain why your work was published more than 1 years earlier on Facebook.
3) for the second image, you need to explain why your work was published more than 1 years earlier on Facebook.
4) if "Miasto Jest Nasze" is the true owner of these images and if you are a representative of them, you could ask them to issue a permission to . However, it might be easier for you to contact one of my Polish colleagues User:jdx or User:Jarekt. --Túrelio (talk) 07:10, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Tak w razie czego mogę pomóc. --Jarekt (talk) 11:06, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Wrongful deletionEdit

Hi, the file: was wrongfully deleted. Every image licensed was under Creative Commons, and I released it under creative commons as well. I provided the sources and everything to prove it as I always do.--TheTexasNationalist99 (talk) 14:20, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Here's where it all began. --TheTexasNationalist99 (talk) 14:23, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
@Túrelio: bump.--TheTexasNationalist99 (talk) 15:10, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi, seems you are correct, at least all images mentioned as source are under a free license. Therefore I've restored the image. Wikimedia servers seem currently to have a problem create the low-res thumb. --Túrelio (talk) 16:04, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

The image of the streetcar does not appear in the description of this collage, which must be immediately deleted. Chronus (talk) 22:41, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Boom! Added it! I would ask what your issue is by the way, since most others don't request swift deletion and instead notify me with a set time frame of finding what may have been missed...--TheTexasNationalist99 (talk) 23:55, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
@Chronus:, in such cases "no source" would be the correct tag. In addition, with obvious good-faith-uploader it might be sufficient to drop them a note on their talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 06:37, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
@Túrelio: Thank you for clarifying--TheTexasNationalist99 (talk) 16:33, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Prince Bader bin Abdullah bin Farhan.jpgEdit

Hi Túrelio, this file has source information. Can you tell me what's missing and what I need to do about it? Thanks. Darley-m (talk) 14:29, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi Darley-m,
"Ministry of Culture, Saudi Arabia" is not considered a sufficient source-information on Commons. We (or anybody) needs to be able to verify the source and the claimed license. --Túrelio (talk) 14:59, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

File talk:Surface Mining Hambach 200800806.jpgEdit

Hallo Túrelio, was hast du denn hiermit gemeint? Gruß --Schniggendiller (talk) 06:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi Schniggendiller,
das was ein misslungenes Einfügen. Habe es nun korrigiert. Danke für den Hinweis. --Túrelio (talk) 08:44, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Question about deletion of File:Holebifilmfestival_Logo.pngEdit

Dear Túrelio,

I noticed you recently deleted the image mentioned above. (original here:
I'm not sure what license I initially selected, but I do believe it qualifies as {{PD-textlogo}} (possibly {{trademarked}}).
Compared with, for example, File:Nielsen_logo.svg or File:Steinberg_logo.png, I think the same logic applies here.

Could you take a look ? If you agree, should I upload it again or file an undeletion request ?

thanks for your time — Kwakeroni (talk) 13:09, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi Kwakeroni,
the logo-image was deleted because you had tagged it by yourself as non-free logo, which automatically leads to speedy-deletion. After viewing the deleted image, I agree that it might go per PD-textlogo. So, I've restored it. However, be prepared that it might be nominated for deletion by anybody else. --Túrelio (talk) 13:17, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Ok thanks, I must have been confused with the different rules on Wikipedia. Anyway I'll see if it remains 'up', otherwise I'll contact the organization and request to stick a license to it. — Kwakeroni (talk) 14:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

3 imagesEdit

Dear Turelio,

If you have some time, please kindly review these images.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:51, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Thanks for your help Turelio. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:38, 16 September 2018 (UTC)


Thanks for reverting my change to Commons:Deceased contributors. I think it got caught in the process of removing some things that didn't belong. I agree that it should be there. Thanks again. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:28, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 07:30, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Social Media Marketing.jpg Is a CC0 FileEdit

Hi Túrelio, I hope you are well. I noted you deleted my uploads below as you could find them on existing sites. All of these images have been taken from Pixabay and are in the public domain under the CC0 Creative Commons licence. THe images i have uploaded have social media icons edited into them so they look quite different to the Pixabay images they are based on. Hopefully they will add value to those writing social media based works. For example the social media marketing.jpg image can be found here

In any case i can understand if you did a quick google image search that they would appear so it looks like infringement. Can you confirm how i can ensure future files i have altered from Pixabay are not deleted and what actions i need to take to undelete my 6 files below (alos included links to all pixabay files below).

I appreciate you have a difficult job with endless tasks so hoping my images will not cause issues for you again.


Al/Today Testing

File:Social Media Marketing Strategy.jpg File:Social Media Marketing Gamble.jpg - File:Social Media Marketing Puzzle.jpg - File:Linkedin Marketing.jpg - File:Social Media Marketing.jpg - File:Social Media Addiction.jpg -

Today Testing (talk) 12:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi Today Testing,
if File:Social Media Marketing.jpg is an edited version of this Pixabay image, why did you claim it as completely own work? That's the reason why another tagged it as copyvio and why I consequently deleted it.
Anyway, IMO the easiest way to prevent these edited images getting suspected as copyvio, would be to 1) upload the original (unedited) image to Commons, and then as 2) step to upload your (edited) version, under an at least slightly different filename and clearly writing in the source-entry {{Derived from|original.jpg}}. If you could do this, then I could undelete your images.
However, another advise for caution: In the description of your uploads, you asked for a credit/link to This might be considered as spam and either removed (or the image itself getting deleted).

--Túrelio (talk) 14:54, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio Regarding your 1st question, I put it as own work after reading the below in 1st paragraph in the section. ‘In, either case, unless the underlying work is in the public domain (see Commons:Public domain) or there is evidence that the underlying work has been freely licensed for reuse (for example, under an appropriate Creative Commons license), the original creator of the work must explicitly authorize the copy/ derivative work before it can be uploaded to Commons.’ I interpreted this as allowing me to authorise my derivative work as my own as it was in the public domain and I have altered them considerably. Apologies if I misunderstood the rule there.

Regarding uploading the images, do you want me to upload all my edited versions again or just the originals – not sure because you mention undeleting the existing images in your message. Also where exactly do you input This file was derived from: Original.jpg
? Is this done by choosing ‘this file is not my own work’ and then putting code into ‘source’ or is it added to the description section?

Lastly, thanks for heads up on spam thing. Can you clarify though, the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license Wikimedia uses states under attribution –‘You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor’. Can I specify to attribute to me or my site given that rule? I understand that using the URL can be spammy but if I removed the url and just stated the name of the website would that be reasonable?

Thanks for your help,

Al / Today Testing Today Testing (talk) 18:06, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

ad 1) whether the author of a PD-released original is mentioned, is mainly a moral/ethical question. IMO, one should do it. As opposed to that, the source of your derivative absolutely needs to be mentioned.
ad 2) no, just the originals. Thereafter, I can undelete your currently deleted derivatives.
ad 3) Correct. But that has nothing to do with copyright or license; that's an application of our (Commons) policy Commons:Project scope.
--Túrelio (talk)

Hi Túrelio Thanks for the update. I have now uploaded all the originals. Not sure if this below link works for you to view them? Kind regards, Al / Today Testing Today Testing (talk) 14:43, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:00, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Photo Yoann BourgeoisEdit


I saw you removed today Yoann Bourgeois' portrait on his wikipedia page saying that we don't have permission to use it I would like to inform you that I modified his page and added this photo on behalf of Yoann as I am working with him and currently in charge of improving his wikipedia page Yoann knows personnally Geraldine and they work together very often; he has bought this photo himself exactly to be able to use it in this kind of situations. I will upload again the portrait and I would be thankful that you do not remove it again

Thank you for your understanding

All the best

— Preceding unsigned comment added by MarievLaura (talk • contribs) 16:14, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
you claimed to be the author of this photo. Now you confirm that you are not. Crediting the true author is an absolute basic in every country's copyright law. So, even if Bourgeois has obtained copyright/permission from Geraldine Aresteanu, she still needs to be mentioned as author. In addition, in such cases (uploader is not author) the uploader needs to provide a written permission from the author or the copyright-holder to . See Commons:Email templates (or Commons:Messages type in French) for the appropiate wording. --Túrelio (talk) 19:16, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

If I am right, we did say that the photo was taken by Geraldine, it was written right underneath the photo Also, when we uploaded the picture, wikipedia doesn't ask us if we own the photo but if we do have the right to use it (at least this is the french translation) which we totally have Anyway, it doesn't really matter to us, maybe we made a mistake in the process and if it is the case we apologise; what we ask is, how can we now upload again Yoann's portrait in the right way ? I tried this afternoon and didn't find an answer to it... thank you for your help

All the best

— Preceding unsigned comment added by MarievLaura (talk • contribs)
The answer was already in my first response: 5th and 6th sentence. You actually cannot re-upload the same image again, as it was deleted for suspicion of copyvio. Also, it's not necessary, as it can easily be undeleted by me or any other admin. However, first you need to provide a permission as explained in my first answer. --Túrelio (talk) 06:45, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

2 imagesEdit

Dear Turelio,

Please help review these 2 images when you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:31, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Thank You for your kind help Turelio. It is much appreciated. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:07, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Undeletion request for US Air Force Academy photosEdit

I'm writing regarding the following files that you deleted after speedy deletion requests:

While it is technically correct that they all had "copyright" licenses on Flickr, it turns out that those licenses are incorrect, an ironic reverse of "license laundering" cases where unscrupulous Flickr users upload others' copyrighted works under free-use CC licenses. AF_Academy is the official Flickr page of the US Air Force Academy, as indicated by the USAFA official Facebook page, so all of its photos are original works of the US Air Force and thus in the public domain. This is a clear case of a false positive, and I hope you reconsider. Arbor to SJ (talk) 16:07, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi Arbor to SJ,
I was aware of the contradiction between license on Flickr and assumed status as Gov works. However, from other US gov accounts I know that they sometimes put such images under CC-BY-ND, which is formally also not accepted on Commons and where we ignored the restricted license. However, we also know that US gov entities sometimes present not-own images on their websites, as "courtesy image", which naturally do not fall under the US gov PD clause. So, when this Flickr account is indeed officially by the "AF Academy", they should know what they do. The "all rights reserved" could mean that these images are also "courtesy images" by other authors. IMO, the best would be if you would contact this Flickr account and ask them directly about the 5 images and send their reply to (OTRS). --Túrelio (talk) 20:06, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Do you have any evidence other than conjecture ("could mean", "sometimes present not-own images") that these pictures are not official US government works? The Air Force Academy Flickr page puts VIRIN's on the names of all its photos (but lazily omits other descriptive info like captions and photographers, for reasons unknown). A VIRIN is "assigned to all DoD personnel who create Visual Information (VI) records", thus meaning that VIRIN's go strictly to works of the US Department of Defense. One of the deleted photos (of Wachenheim and Calhoun) has the VIRIN 160902-F-KB029-2017, the "F" in the second field standing for US Air Force. Arbor to SJ (talk) 03:41, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, but that's not how it works here. It's the task of the uploader of not-own works to convince the community that the uploads are under a free license. If there were blatant copyvio-evidence, you would have got just 1 short sentence from me. Also, I don't understand why you did not take my hint and just contacted the Flickr-account to get clarity about the copyright. Anyway, as I am offline for the rest of the day (and eventually also tomorrow), I recommend you to take this case to COM:UDR, where other admins may view it. --Túrelio (talk) 07:08, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Alright then. I just wanted to approach you first before attempting UDR. Arbor to SJ (talk) 20:25, 20 September 2018 (UTC)


Im Thread "fragen wegen bewohner des kohle bergwerks..." wird der Klarname eines gewissen Herrn verwendet. Sollte man den vorsichtshalber ausblenden und mit revdel verstecken? DSGVO lässt grüßen, und auch sonst mag ja nicht jeder seinen Namen im Internet wiederfinden. De728631 (talk) 16:06, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi De728631,
ich habs einfach mal auf die Initialen gekürzt. Danke für den Hinweis. --Túrelio (talk) 18:53, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

File talk:Boeing 717-200 Jetstar.jpgEdit

Why did you not only revert my speedy deletion, but also protect the talk page? The content is a duplicate of the file page, with no additional information. -- 07:35, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

1) Because what you did, is edit-warring. You might even have been blocked. 2) No, it is not, I compared the content. Whether the information on the talkpage is relevant, is a different question, but it's not a duplicate. --Túrelio (talk) 07:38, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
What does edit-warring mean? Why does irrelevant information have to be protected?-- 09:36, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
en:Wikipedia:Edit warring. I didn't say it's irrelevant. Do you really have nothing better to do than to edit the talk page? Why such interest in this page? --Túrelio (talk) 10:19, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

4 imagesEdit

Dear Turelio,

When you have the time, please kindly review these images.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:06, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 10:19, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank You Turelio for your kind help here. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:33, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Deleted File:Sarmaticus Astronomus Nicolas Copernicus c 1543.jpgEdit

This image had 2 Public Domain references (one of them is Wikipedia!!!) containing the very same information buried in much text of the Free e-book by Google that Wiki is citing Corpus Reformatorum (details below), yet my original illustration with proper embedded and explicit references through Wikipedia itself (and presently on Wikipedia) was deleted evidently maliciously, diversely, and plurally, due to the fact that subsequently also in the article the "editors" deleted all references to Polish Sarmatian Astronomer Nicolas Copernicus which is a fact of history through a number of other references, which the "editors" also deliberately deleted (about half of the references of books published in the last 500 years on Copernicus)!

The File:Sarmaticus Astronomus Nicolas Copernicus c 1543.jpg that I have created, in fact specifically is cited in the Public Domain through Google e-books, and on Wikipedia, as and at Corpus Reformatorum: The Corpus Reformatorum online CR 4 - 1837

Corpus reformatorum, Volume 4 C.A. Schwetschke, 1837

You need to scroll down to the cited page 679!

Which was stated in the deleted File:Sarmaticus Astronomus Nicolas Copernicus c 1543.jpg ... “Page 679 of vol. IV of Corpus Reformatorum, containing a letter (of Oct. 16, 1541) from Philip Melanchton to a Mr. Burcard Mithobius, with first historic reference to "that Sarmatian astronomer who is trying to stop the sun and move the earth." ...

Rosetecscc (talk) 21:19, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

please, no conspiration theories. The file had been tagged by 1 editor as possible copyvio due to "not sure where this came from, but not self made. The texts could be old, but the writing underneath does not. Plus it is text mainly, not an image." Consequently I've performed the deletion.
The problem is not the Latin text, but the separate text portions below the Latin texts, as they are far more recent and clearly within the time-frame for copyright protection. The left text mentions a source from 1953, the right one another source from 1990. So, you could crop away the two smaller portions of the likely copyrighted commentary texts and everything would be o.k., in regard to copyright. --Túrelio (talk) 07:12, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

File deleted Székely_Norbert.jpgEdit

Hello Túrelio, Can you help me with my file? I've took this picture with my own camera, and edit by myself on my laptop. but it has been deleted. (ékely_Norbert)

Thank you.


— Preceding unsigned comment added by Alencar.rossoni (talk • contribs) 08:13, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
I see, it's not the same photo as the first version. However, it's not a native camera file. Could you temporarily upload the native camera file? (It can thereafter be removed). --Túrelio (talk) 08:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio,

I would like to upload with the native camera file, but the picture is available now, and it shows that the picture is duplicate, what should I do ? The native camera file is this one IMG_9409.JPG,

Thank you

Alencar.rossoni (talk) 09:06, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

if I understand you correctly, our software says it's a duplicate and does not allow you to upload the "new" file, right? If yes, then it is not really the native image from the camera, as the EXIF data of the undeleted image clearly shows no camera data at all. The data shown are from an imaging software (Adobe Photoshop), which was used to edit the image. --Túrelio (talk) 10:26, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Can you help me to understand, can not I edit a picture in the adobe photoshop and after upload it ? And another question, the picture is available in the commons wikimedia, Can I use it?

Thank you,

Alencar.rossoni (talk) 12:40, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

About the deletion of File:A vindication of K Fleuron T070182-1.pngEdit

Hello Túrelio,

Could you explain why File:A vindication of K Fleuron T070182-1.png has been deleted, please? Your motive is: "Uploads by Fæ needing speedy deletion". Is it a massive deletion of all the files uploaded by a user called "Fæ"?

This file is the title page of a book published in 1711: I hardly think there might be any copyright issue.

Regards, --Daehan (talk) 15:29, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Fae had uploaded xxthousands of scans from old documents. A relative small nummber of them, still hundreths, contain just the scan of a line or a page-number or other useless things, as the original documents were likely scanned automatically and were then "automatically" uploaded to Commons. These to-be-deleted uploads are put into Category:Uploads by Fæ needing speedy deletion, partly by Fae himself or by others. So, the deletion has nothing to do with copyright, but all with being trash-files. I usually check all, whether they are in use, which I never found. So, in case, the above mentioned file had indeed been in use, tell me and I will undelete it. --Túrelio (talk) 19:58, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello Túrelio,
Yes, I use it in two articles in French Wikipedia: it allows me to illustrate a section with extra information without creating a note. So if it's not too much trouble, I would need it.
Thank you, --Daehan (talk) 14:48, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Ok. I've undeleted it now. --Túrelio (talk) 18:10, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Potential copyviosEdit

You recently deleted this file, which I tagged as a clear copyvio. Having looked, I think many other recent uploads by user Maumivi are copyright violations. Perhaps you could take a look? RGloucester (talk) 15:45, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Will look into it later this week. --Túrelio (talk) 22:02, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

2 imagesEdit

Dear Turelio,

If you have some time, please review these 2 images below.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:53, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

When clicking on the MP links, I got "We're sorry, but something went wrong." --Túrelio (talk) 21:28, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
  • OK. Perhaps the system is down. That's OK. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:38, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Venus vom Hohlefels-BildEdit

Hallo, warum schreibst du dem Museum nicht und bittest um Erlaubnis, das Bild zu vernwenden. Damit kann man Werbung für das Museum verbinden. Die müssen doch ein Interesse daran haben (a) gut dazustehen und (b) Werbung für ihr Mmuseum durch das bild zu bekommen. In der BIldunterschrift werdne sie erwähnt. Dein Bild war erheblich bessser als das jetzt verwendete.... Gruß. Mr. bobby (talk) 19:54, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

ähem, die gelöschten Bilder waren nicht die meinen. Wo auch immer du auf meinen Namen gestoßen bist, das liegt darin dass ich als Admin sie gelöscht habe, auf dringlichen Wunsch des Fotografen, der - mit gewissem Recht - eine Klage des Museums fürchtet. --Túrelio (talk) 20:28, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Deleting previous versions of fileEdit

Hello Túrelio. Can previous versions of a file be deleted? I uploaded some files whose pages I had accidentally cut out. I uploaded the correct ones, but will like to see the old versions removed. They’re just wasting space and are of no use. Thanks. MonsterHunter32 (talk) 21:24, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Yes. But you will not save any space by that, as nothing is really deleted, it's just hidden. Any admin (and higher) can undelete it. Therefore, we perform such version-deletions only if there is a good reason for it. --Túrelio (talk) 21:30, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Oh well, then there's no need. I just asked on the presumption that it will save space. Will be more careful. Thanks anyway. MonsterHunter32 (talk) 21:32, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Borrado de la pagina: Antonio Pinto RenedoEdit

Hola, pedi el cambio de mi nombre verdadero por el nuevo Antonio9025 para evitar que se pudieran relacionar los dos nombres, pero aunque la pagina con mi nombre verdadero a sido borrada todavia aparecen los registros donde se indica la relacion entre los dos nombres, se pueden borrar tambien esos registros? Lo digo porque si se pone mi nombre verdadero en google aparece la pagina de wikimedia kommons con los registros de actividad con el nombre antiguo y el nuevo juntos. Agradecería si se pudieran borrar tambien.--Antonio.P9025 (talk) 21:23, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

I am not sure to understand what you mean by "los registros". I have now deleted the redirect from your old talkpage to your new talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 19:31, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

File:BW Tätigkeitsabzeichen Pioniertruppe.pngEdit

Moin, du hast leider die falsche Version gelöscht.

File:BW Tätigkeitsabzeichen Pioniertruppe.png → File:BW Tätigkeitsabzeichen Pioniere.jpg

Die PNG hatte Transparenz und war korrekt benannt. Ebenso stimmen Quellen und Angaben. Die JPG sollte abgelöst werden. Kannst du das bitte korrigieren? Danke -- Gunnar (💬) 14:52, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi Gunnar,
an sich hatte ich die Duplikat-Richtung bewußt herumgedreht, weil mir das nun verbliebene Bild schärfer erschien. Auf Transparenz und so hatte ich allerdings nicht geachtet. Nun umgekehrt. --Túrelio (talk) 08:51, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

2018 Sulawesi earthquakeEdit

Hello. I'm PaPa PaPaRoony, the uploader of the photos of the 2018 Sulawesi earthquake. I've asked for permission for the photos and he had said that he permitted the use of the photos. However, I've just received notification s that said that you've just deleted the photos.. May I have an explanation why? PaPa PaPaRoony 21:24 UTC, 30 September 2018

Hi PaPa PaPaRoony,
I've deleted only File:Dampak-GempaPalu-1.jpg, if I remember correctly.
On Twitter[1] you had asked "Can Wikipedia use these photos for their articles? We will credit you for these photos!" Such a "for Wikipedia" permission is not acceptable on Commons, see our licensing policy. You need to ask the author/photographer whether he/she is willing to release his/her images under a free license, which allows anybody to use them, provided the license terms are met.
If you want to do that, you should 1) choose a license, which you want to propose to the Twitter user. I would recommend our preferred CC-BY-SA license. 2) You need to be honest towards the photographer, in the sense that you explain what a release of his images under such a license means: anybody can use it, even commercially; only has to credit the photographer. 3) If he agrees and confirms, you may notify me again. --Túrelio (talk) 08:43, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Account sperrenEdit

Kannst du den Account Extramasterspongebob bitte sperren? Dein Kollege Doc Taxon hat den vor zwei Jahren in der Wikipedia auch gesperrt, falls du mir nicht glaubst. Ich wusste es nicht, dass ich diesen Account noch habe. Er gehört nämlich mir. Mit Doppelaccounts möchte ich hier eigentlich nicht direkt rumlaufen. Ich bitte um die Sperrung. Danke schon mal. --RS34 (talk) 08:12, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:31, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you!Edit

  The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Thank you for deleting photographs of Dülmen (redirections) with the wrong names. XRay talk 08:37, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Undeletion request: File:Part of taxon treatment of Sholicola ashambuensis (screenshot).png is from a CC BY 4.0 article and was correctly labeled as suchEdit

See doi:10.1186/s12862-017-0882-6 for source. I do not appreciate that you did not even check the source, which was properly indicated. -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 10:37, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

I did indeed check before deleting, so far for your assumption. However, I looked just at the head of the article and at its end, where it says "© The Author(s). 2017". Restored now. --Túrelio (talk) 12:22, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Neubauer BildEdit

Warum wurde das Bild gelöscht? Wir haben jägliche Rechte auf Ihre Bilder :(

Mfg Sandy B.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by NuP2018 (talk • contribs) 07:39, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi Sandy,
weil das Bild Code enthält, der zeigt, das von Facebook kopiert wurde. Material auf Facebook betrachten wir nicht per se als ausreichend frei. D.h., falls du das Foto nicht selbst aufgenommen hast, musst du eine Genehmigung des Photographen an senden. Falls du oder die Institution, für die du arbeitest, die Rechte an dem Foto halten, dann musst du dies gegenüber formell erklären, unter Angabe der offiziellen Kontaktdaten, die eine Rückfrage erlauben. Deine Mail wird nicht veröffentlicht, sondern kann nur von unseren OTRS-Mitarbeitern eingesehen werden. --Túrelio (talk) 12:42, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

2 imagesEdit

Dear Turelio,

If you can, please help review these 2 good images below.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:35, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

  • Thank you for your help Turelio. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:17, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Undeletion requestEdit

Plese note that according to the Finnish Copyright Act, § 46a, film stills are free after 50 years of cinematography, similarly as photographs are free according to § 49a. You can read the Act here: Tekijänoikeuslaki (404/1961).

Also, it is rather questionable to delete the file File:Kielletty-kirja.jpg “behind one’s back,” without allowing the uploader to comment on the deletion.

Please undelete the said file. --Mlang.Finn (talk) 16:17, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

My bad, the nominator should have notified you. However, I missed to check for that. Ok, I will temp-undelete the file, but put the request into regular DR. --Túrelio (talk) 16:26, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Here we are: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kielletty-kirja.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 16:28, 4 October 2018 (UTC)


im a African editor from Namibia and i have the rights to use any of those images. i was given the duty to create wikipedias for big artist's in my country.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Frutnesswork (talk • contribs) 18:15, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
You need to provide proof for that claim. You need to contact each of the photographers of the 2 images and ask them whether they are willing to release these images under a Commons-compliant free license (see COM:L). A permissions "for Wikipedia" is not accepted. They need to send their permission to . --Túrelio (talk) 18:24, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Mail ?Edit

Ich wollte nachfragen, ob meine Mail (21:04) bei Dir angekommen ist? LG, --Geolina mente et malleo 20:21, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Ja, gerade gesehen und erledigt. Grüße --Túrelio (talk) 20:34, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Vielen herzlichen Dank...--Geolina mente et malleo 20:37, 8 October 2018 (UTC)


علش بغيتي تمسح صورة sourir

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamila jamola (talk • contribs) 21:01, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Please read the comments on my talk page. I would say they prove I did not just opload files with the wrong copyright status. I asked the owner if it was ok and he was fine with it. --Judithcomm (talk) 09:01, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Replied on your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 09:46, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Sent a mail to Andor as you suggested. It would have been nice to have been alerted in advance that the deletions were going to take place. I too take the Commons copyright policy very seriously and have done for years now. To be honest, I was offended by the threat to block me. --Judithcomm (talk) 10:52, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Threat to block? Oh, I see, it's in the template. Sorry, but the notification wasn't individually written to you. It is automatically applied when a no-perm or speedy tag is added to a file. I have zero influence on its content. Anyway, an established user doesn't get blocked so fast. --Túrelio (talk)

File:Piotr Więcek Formula D Atlanta 2017.jpg and File:Piotr Więcek.jpgEdit


A proper agreement to OTRS has been sent just today, regarding these 2 pictures. ticket:2018090310003585 Can you undelete them? Cheers, Polimerek (talk) 12:43, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Ok. --Túrelio (talk) 12:51, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

This DREdit

Dear Turelio,

If you wish you could close this 1 day DR as delete and delete the even the uploader said he made a mistake here. It is not free. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:40, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:12, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment: Thank You Turelio. --Leoboudv (talk) 02:00, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Walter HelsperEdit

Hallo Túrelio! Aus welchem Grund wurde die Seite "Walter Helsper" gelöscht? Ich besitze für alle Abbildungen die ausdrückliche Erlaubnis zur Veröffentlichung durch die Erbengemeinschaft Walter Helsper. Für jedes einzelne Bild habe ich das entsprechende Formular eingereicht. Am 27. und 28.08.2017 ist der Eingang mit automatisierter Antwort von "Permissions-German wikipedia" bestätigt worden. Ich habe bis heute keine weitere Antwort erhalten, auch auf mehrere Anfragen nicht. Stattdessen sind die Bilder ohne weitere Nachricht gelöscht worden, das ist überhaupt nicht zu akzeptieren. Ich bitte um dringende Wiederherstellung aller Dateien! Vielen Dank für Deine Kooperation.--Kirchners (talk) 10:02, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi Kirchners,
die Galerie-Seite Walter Helsper wurde gelöscht, weil sie leer war (wenn die Bilder mal wiederhergestellt worden sind, kann ich diese Seite gerne entlöschen). Die Bilder habe ich nicht gelöscht, sondern mein Kollege User:Jcb, allerdings schon vor mehr als 1 Monat. Wenn du eine Genehmigung an OTRS geschickt hast, was in solch einem Fall der Standard ist, kann es leider recht lange dauern. Die Warteschlange (Einreichung -> Entscheidung) liegt derzeit bei 150 Tagen! Das ist eigentlich Wahnsinn; du musst aber bedenken, dass es ausschließlich Ehrenamtler sind, die die unzähligen bei OTRS eingehenden Mails bearbeiten. Da kann ich auch als Admin nichts dran ändern. (Habs mal versucht und mir eine ziemliche Abfuhr eingehandelt) --Túrelio (talk) 10:46, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Danke für die prompte Antwort. Wie bereits gesagt, hatte ich entsprechende Genehmigungen an OTRS gesendet. Eine Wartezeit von 150 Tagen ist in der Tat sehr bedauerlich, und in meinem Fall noch nicht verstrichen. Sicherlich kannst Du also nichts daran ändern, aber zwei kleine Verbesserungsvorschläge seien angebracht: Ihr solltet Autoren über diese Problematik grundsätzlich informieren. Die Routine "Bild mit mutmaßlichem Urheberrechtsproblem markieren" und nach gewisser Zeit ohne Berücksichtigung der gesendeten Genehmigung an OTRS bzw. ohne jegliche Nachricht das Bild löschen sollte dringend verändert werden.--Kirchners (talk) 11:29, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Was ich i.a. empfehle und was dann meistens auch hilft ist, gleich beim Upload, vorausgesetzt die Genehmigungsmail ist unterwegs, den Baustein {{OTRS pending}} auf das betroffene Bild zu setzen. Dann wird meistens nicht gelöscht. --Túrelio (talk) 13:13, 10 October 2018 (UTC)


Would you please delete this nom - It's not ready yet. Thanks - Atsme✍🏻📧 15:12, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:46, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Deleted ImagesEdit

I noticed you deleted a handful of images from In Common. I posted a DR a little bit ago due to the same issue, but I guess I didn't have to go through that method. Since you deleted some, I thought I would mention that these three images from the same source are still on Commons, and should probably be deleted as well: File:Jin in 2018.jpg, File:Jin_KBS_Song_Festival_2017.jpg, and File:Jin KBS Song Festival 2017.jpg. DanielleTH (talk) 02:01, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Foto von Simone MenneEdit

Hallo Túrelio, du hast heute ein Foto von Simone Menne gelöscht, weil es angeblich von hercareer stammt, was nicht richtig ist. Es ist ein frei verwendbares Pressebild von ihr, dass für Veranstaltungen und Artikel genutzt werden darf sowie auf ihrer eigenen Seite Ich bitte dich, dass wieder rückgängig zu machen. Ich stelle keine Bilder ein, die nicht genutzt werden dürfen.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by AnnaQuickRathgeber (talk • contribs) 14:49, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Hallo Anna, ganz so einfach geht es nicht. Du hattest für das Foto File:20180202-13x19-JMai 0345-2.jpg "Jürgen Mai" als Urheber (also nicht du) und als Quelle "Aufnahme einer Person des öffentlichen Lebens" angegeben. Abgesehen davon, dass letzteres keine Quelle ist (höchstens ein Argument warum das Foto nicht gegen Persönlichkeitsrechte verstösst), hast du somit keinerlei für uns überprüfbaren Nachweis erbracht, dass das Foto tatsächlich unter der beanspruchten CC-Lizenz steht. "Pressebilder" gelten bei uns a priori nicht als "frei", weil ihre Nutzung in den meisten Fällen eingeschränkt ist (nur für Berichte im Zusammenhang mit der abgebildeten Person) und sie meist nicht verändert werden dürfen. Dies entspricht aber nicht unseren Vorgaben für frei lizenzierte Bilder (siehe COM:L). Zum weiteren Vorgehen habe ich dir bereits auf deiner Disku geantwortet. --Túrelio (talk) 15:04, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Frage zu zu löschenden BildernEdit

Hallo Túrelio,

du hast diverse neue Bilder von mir zur Löschung markiert. Du wirst dafür sicher einen Grund haben, aber ich verstehe leider den Grund nicht. Wo ist der Unterschied zwischen dem von selbst geschossenen Bild zu beispielsweise diesem hier ? Oder auch diesem hier ?

Sollte tatsächlich ein Verstoß vorliegen, so sollen die Bilder selbstverständlich gelöscht werden.

Ich bin relativ neu, daher würde ich mich über eine Erklärung freuen.



— Preceding unsigned comment added by Willibald11 (talk • contribs) 13:39, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
Es ist so, dass Verpackungen, die mehr als nur Text enthalten, im Zweifelsfall als geschützt anzusehen sind. Das gilt insbesondere wenn es sich um Fotos auf der Verpackung handelt, wie im Fall der Hanuta-Verpackung. Generelle Info dazu (aber auf englisch): Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Product_packaging. Ich habe für das andere, von dir benannte Foto ebenfalls die Löschung beantragt, allerdings als regulärer LA, um eine Diskussion zu erlauben. Von deinem Foto habe ich den SLA entfernt und in einen reguläre LA umgewandelt: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fritz-kola-02.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 14:29, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
Ok, soweit verstanden. Danke. Dann müsste aber gemäß dem von mir aufgeführten Beispiel die Fritz-Flasche durchgehen? Oder das andere Foto auch gelöscht werden. Sonst wird mit zweierlei Maß gemessen. --Willibald11 (talk) 14:36, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
Alles klar. Ich bin gespannt. --Willibald11 (talk) 14:38, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
"zweierlei Maß" - schau, auf Commons werden täglich ca. 20000 neue Dateien hochgeladen, davon geschätzt 10% Urheberrechtverletzungen. Einige Benutzer, die aber sämtlich Freiwillige sind, kümmern sich darum, sich diese Dateien anzuschauen, ob damit Probleme bestehen. Da ist es wohl logisch, dass viele Dateien durchrutschen. Zudem sind Fälle wie die deinen keine "blatant copyvio", sondern Grenzfälle wo man abschätzen muss, liegt das noch unter oder schon über der Schwelle für einen urheberrechtlichen Schutz. --Túrelio (talk) 14:51, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
Das war auch gar nicht böse gemeint! Ihr Freiwilligen macht eine tolle Arbeit. Nur will ich für meine Uploads kämpfen. Nicht, dass ich deswegen noch gesperrt werden. ;) Es gibt unzählige Beispiel von Produktabbildungen, die in meinen Augen dann ebenfalls gegen die oben genannte Regel verstoßen. Daher freue ich mich über die Diskussion, die du gestartet hast. --Willibald11 (talk) 15:04, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:2005 Honda Shadow Aero 750cc.jpgEdit

I appreciate your help correcting my mistake. --WhiteBook (talk) 14:02, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi, that's easy. The image was under a license CC-BY-ND-NC[2], which is not allowed on Commons (see COM:L). Not all CC licenses are allowed on Commons, only CC-BY, CC-BY-SA and CC-0. --Túrelio (talk) 14:45, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Quick deletionEdit

Hi User:Túrelio,

You've deleted File:NIND MuseeL-bleu ISO3200.jpg minutes after it was marked as a possible copyright violation. This gives no chance to look into the matter and attempt to contact the relevant copyright holder, I don't think that is the proper way to handle deletion requests.

--Trougnouf (talk) 21:29, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Actually that is the proper way of dealing with copyright issues which was sanctioned by the Commons community. It is called "speedy deletion" for a reason. I'm sorry, but you as the uploader would have had to take care of researching the copyright status and obtaining a licence from the copyright holder before uploading the image here. Please see Commons:Project scope/Evidence. De728631 (talk) 22:44, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
I didn't realize that one was a speedy deletion request as all the other related ones weren't, thank you for clearing that up. --Trougnouf (talk) 08:44, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

4 imagesEdit

Dear Tureio,

If you have some time, please review these images below.

Thank You kindly, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:22, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

  Done. Was offline most of the day. --Túrelio (talk) 14:47, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks Turelio for your help here. Have a good night. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:37, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Jessica PareEdit

Next time, before you do this and have an image deleted at Commons, please actually look at the photo and see if it truly is a duplicate. In this case, it was not a duplicate but edited to be improved upon, and far beyond just being a crop of same. -- ψλ 17:06, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi Winkelvi,
that wouldn't have helped in this case. As I was able to find out now, shortly before tagging File:Jessica Pare 2014.jpg as a duplicate, another user had overwritten your retouched version with the original (un-retouched) image from Flickr. So, when I duplicate-processed the file, it was indeed a duplicate. --Túrelio (talk) 18:37, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Who was the editor? -- ψλ 23:20, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
User:Elisfkc. Nevertheless, my fault was not to recognize this. --Túrelio (talk) 06:07, 15 October 2018 (UTC)



A few months ago you had deleted an image that was taken from my website and used on a computer wallpaper website without my permission and apparently copyrighted it. As a result, you deleted it. I uploaded the ORIGINAL (Mine that I am the photographer and owner of the car [1992 Camaro z28])

I am wondering how to re-edit the page so to include my photo since you deleted the "copycat"

This is the original re-uploaded one

The one that I linked originally was "," who is using my picture.

I am trying to figure out how to put it back (Mine) into the like where it was before but using my original one.. Not the one who stole it..

Thanks very much for your help,


— Preceding unsigned comment added by Camarosource (talk • contribs) 01:54, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Respecto a File:Masgranadafiscalia.jpgEdit

Estimado Turelio, ruego no borres fotos unilateralmente sin consultar previamente. Dicha foto fue puesta bajo alerta por el usuario LMLM. Hablé con dicho usuario, explicándole que sobre dicha foto no había problemas de violación de copyright, puesto que la foto la hice yo, y puedo demostrarlo, tengo incluso el archivo RAW de Photoshop. Ruego, entonces y en consecuencia, que no borres todo aquello que pueda parecerte susceptible de borrar sin informarte previamente y preguntar. Muchas gracias, --Granadino7 (talk) 11:50, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

the evidence suggests otherwise, as the image was published externally earlier (than uploaded to Commons) and in slightly higher resolution.[3] Therefore it did qualify for speedy-deletion. Anyway, as you mentioned evidence to the contrary, I'm willing to undelete it and put it into a regular DR, which allows presentation of further evidence and a discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 13:12, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
So, here you are: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Masgranadafiscalia.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 13:15, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

De qué manera puedo mostrarte que hice la edición de la foto, ¿puedo enviarte a algún correo electrónico capturas de mi escritorio que lo confirmen? Desconozco qué metodos de demostración existen para casos de este tipo. Gracias por tu gentileza al recuperar la imagen provisionalmente, --Granadino7 (talk) 13:58, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Well, for example you could upload the original image, as it came out of the camera, with camera EXIF data. (you may label it as test upload, so can rapidly delete it) --Túrelio (talk) 20:00, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Dream Country CD cover 2000x2000.jpgEdit

We have an OTRS ticket for this image you deleted. Please undelete. BTW, is this the best place to ask you to undelete files as I see more which may have good permissions? Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 12:59, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

  Done and yes to your question. --Túrelio (talk) 13:01, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
That was fast, thanks. Ww2censor (talk) 13:03, 15 October 2018 (UTC)


Dera Túrelio, Thankyou for your help. Unfortunately I am not used to insert image in commons, or at least images like these. I Classified them as "OWN" because I took pics or copy of them. And the date are wrong because i insert the date of today. Really most of the pics are taken by a my collegue here in the University. I'll ask him the date as soon as possible (tomorrow morning) and I'll correct them. About pics that could be erased immediately they are taken by the same photograph that works here for us. If is possible not delete them immediately I can ask and modified the licence. It's possible that another person answer or talk with you instead of me: is Alberto Ugolini, the editir of the rewiew. Thankyou again!! --Ricce (talk) 15:05, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi Ricce,
I thought something like this. You didn't look like a careless copyviolator. With "date of original photography" I mean the year, of course. That's also important for the evaluation whether some of the older images might be in the public domain already. But therefore we need to know who was the original photographer (and when he/she did die). The still living photographing colleague should send a statement mentioning the file-names of the images, which he had originally shot, and the license under which he wants to release these images. I would recommend not to use PD-self, but instead CC-BY oder CC-BY-SA, which are more appropriate for images of living persons. The permission should be send to . For the wording, see Commons:Modello richiesta di permesso. --Túrelio (talk) 15:24, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Copyvio & blockEdit

Hi Túrelio, Hope all is well,

I don't usually like to ask for DRs to be closed mega early but in this case I was wondering if you could close this DR and then block the uploader (Fieryflames) for a week or 3?,

They're currently edit warring at English Wikipedia and as they've already uploaded 2 copyright violation images something tells me if the image in the DR is deleted they're going to return to immediately upload the same copyvio images,

Many thanks :), –Davey2010Talk 02:13, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. Upload was indeed a blatant copyvio from Getty; this is always speedy-material. --Túrelio (talk) 06:35, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
No worries and many many thanks for dealing with the DR and editor - It's very much appreciated Túrelio :), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 11:25, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

angebliches "OTRS pending"Edit


könnte Du mal einen Blick auf werfen?

Das Bild wurde offensichtlich ohne Erlaubnis hochgeladen. Nach einer Markierung "no permission" hat der Uploader diese Markierung entfernt und "OTRS kontaktiert" als Text eingefügt (14. September).

Da am 16. Oktober noch immer kein OTRS-Baustein vorhanden war, habe ich das Bild wieder mit "no permission" marktiert. Das wurde von einer IP wieder entfernt und von der IP der Baustein "OTRS pending" eingesetzt. Am nächsten Tag dasselbe Spiel nochmal.

Da der Uploader in deWP ein bezahlter Auftragsschreiber ist und er bzw. die dahinter stehende Agentur bereits vielfach durch Urheberrechtsverletzungen auffiel, vermute ich, dass überhaupt keine Erlaubnis vorliegt und auch über OTRS gar nichts oder nichts Brauchbares eingegangen ist. Ich vermute, die Agentur versucht, mit dem "OTRS pending" die Bildlöschung zu vermeiden (zumindest so lange, bis ihr Auftraggeber gezahlt hat).

Wie kann ich in einem solchen Fall weiter vorgehen? Die Agentur spielt dieses Spiel bei einer ganzen Reihe von Bildern so. --Zxmt (talk) 05:36, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Moin @Zxmt:,
puuh, Kein einfacher Fall. Es sieht mir zumindest nicht nach einer "blatant copyvio" aus. Via Google-Images und Tineye habe ich das Foto sonst nirgendwo gefunden. Der Hochlader sieht auch nicht aus wie ein typischer sorgloser copyvio-Hochlader. Bei seinem anderen, inzwischen gelöschten Upload hatte er auch nicht behauptet selbst der Urheber zu sein, sondern einen anderen Namen als Urheber angegeben und ebenfalls auf eine Genehmigungsmail verwiesen. Von :de war mir das Konto bislang nicht bekannt. Wenn jemand paid-edits offenlegt und sogar den Auftraggeber nennt, sind bewusste URVs m.E. eher unwahrscheinlich, weil das ja auf den Auftraggeber zurückfällt. Das Problem ist die derzeit exzessive Warteschlange von 154 (!!!) Tagen bei OTRS. Das ist für Externe vollkommen unverständlich und eigentlich auch inakzeptabel. Solange aber nicht mehr Leute bei OTRS mitmachen, wird sich das nicht ändern. Die WMF, die auf Mio. $ sitzt, kümmert das offenbar nicht die Bohne. Zurück zum Fall: in der Gesamtwertung würde ich es insgesamt für angemessen halten, dem Hochlader die 150-160 Tage nach Ankündigung des OTRS-Kontakts (14.9.) zu geben, bevor das Bild gelöscht wird. Das ist aber nur meine Einschätzung; man kann auch anders entscheiden. --Túrelio (talk) 07:07, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Danke für die Einschätzung und Rückmeldung: Die Agentur ("Weltraumagentur") arbeitet halt nicht seriös (vgl. inzwischen gesperrtes Hauptkonto Timon Straub und Sockenzoo: ) Benutzer Luuuuuuka ist aber wohl nur "freier Mitarbeiter" und wurde daher (bislang) nicht gesperrt. Die Bild-URVs ziehen sich durch die Artikel der Agentur wie ein roter Faden. Für den Upload werden inzwischen auch Konten angelegt, die notwendige Rechte zumindest möglich erscheinen lassen (bei Swiss Holiday Park z.B. User:SwissHP oder bei Julia Hanzl eben User:JuliaHanzl . Bei anderen Bildern von Hanzl hatte Timon.Straub sogar vermerkt, eine OTRS-Freigabe sei "vorhanden" (vgl. z.B. ) Damit schafft es die Agentur natürlich, ihre Machenschaften weiter zu führen - die Kunden kriegen die Probleme im Artikel bzw. mit den Bildern erst mit, wenn die Agentur längst ihr Geld hat. Aber wenn es keine anderen Möglichkeiten gibt, dann ist das halt so. --Zxmt (talk) 07:38, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Ok. Bei solch einer Vorgeschichte, die mir nicht bekannt war, sieht die Situation natürlich anders aus. Da wäre eine Löschung 7 Tage nach Erstplazierung von no-perm gerechtfertigt. --Túrelio (talk) 10:34, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

File:محلات سبع أبكار وما حلوها.jpgEdit

Hello Túrelio I am not so experienced in using wikimedia, I feel lost sometimes, I received a notification from you concerning deletions of some my uploads, earlier I received a similar notification from the user and to seek help I asked him about the alternative map that is acceptable by wikipedia, he said OpenStreetMap is ok, and I heeded his advice, now the suggested deletions by you are taken from OpenStreetMap, why do you want to delete them?--Abu aamir (talk) 07:03, 18 October 2018 (UTC) below is my conversation with Ronhjones

Hello Ronhjones one of my uploaded sketches was deleted twice on the ground of copyrights without informing me about the alternative, how to display an image of the neighborhood with the surrounding area? my image was a naked imagery of google maps, it was I who defined boundaries and put labels.

I could have taken the same image from Wikimapia but unfortunately Wikimapia is full of scratches. I have seen much bigger images displayed on Wikipedia undeleted. I think that warning needs to be tutorial rather than threatening.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Abu aamir (talk • contribs) 20:21, 3 April 2018 (UTC) @Abu aamir: They are standard messages as generated by the system when there is a copyright issue flagged. Google Map's License is not compatible with Commons. OpenStreetMap is a normal alternative. Ronhjones (Talk) 21:40, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi Abu aami,
it would help if you could specify to which files/images you are referring.
  • File:حدود سبع أبكار.jpg is declared to be from, but you did not provide a link to the source-page, where this map is shown. This is needed in order to check the claim that it's free. --Túrelio (talk) 07:11, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Affiche 835x1181 sweetcocoon.pngEdit

Hello Turelio I come to you regarding the suppression of the film poster "Sweet Cocoon" I work for the production company who owns this film's right, and which gave me the permission to publish it on wikipedia How can I do in order to make this poster acceptable for Wikimedia commons ? Thanks a lot --Lindaz818 (talk) 11:40, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi Lindaz818,
you need to ask the rightsholder (esma ?) to send a Déclaration de consentement (see Commons:Messages type for a template) to It needs to mention the file name and the choosen free license. --Túrelio (talk) 12:36, 18 October 2018 (UTC)


Werxa is just another Sol-lol sock. Checkuser sadly often takes weeks. Not sure what to do about it. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:14, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 18:27, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

I don't know what information is missing about license in my uploaded imagesEdit

Hi! Turélio, can you help me? I just uploaded the following images:

I have permission on all those images, since they were created by me and the members of the band related to them. But I got a message saying that they were marked to be erased... What do I have to do to avoid it?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Msmourao (talk • contribs)
let's see about "were created by me and the members of the band":
the 1st one: you wrote "Fotógrafo desconhecido", but it has a clear watermark, likely by the photographer. So, you need to provide his permission.
the 2nd one: you wrote "Fotógrafo desconhecido", but the EXIF data state "Photographer: Marcus Azevedo Fotografia". So, you need to provide his permission.
the 3rd one: you wrote "Criado por Bruno Gozzi". Ok, then you need get him send his permission to
--Túrelio (talk) 18:26, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

2 imagesEdit

Dear Turelio,

Please review these images if you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:24, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

  • Thanks for your kind help Turelio. Goodnight from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:57, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Lung capacity measures.pngEdit

Can you explain why did you sack File:Lung capacity measures.png (histlogsabuse log)? Aren’t you handy with tracing history of Commons files? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 06:46, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Because the now remaining image is simply (though only slightly) better, I reversed the requested duplicate-deletion. I thought indeed about that and compared both images. --Túrelio (talk) 07:23, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Because you disagreed with the original tagging, you had—at very least—to document reasons for your disagreement, without making me to walk here. Now your opinion is overridden by three Commons users, mirroring my situation of October 21. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 06:34, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
All quality-related things aside, what originally was w:File:Lung.png was released by its creator, Someone_else, into public domain, whereas the Vietnamese claimed {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} for his/her stuff. You attempted to erase Someone_else’s {{PD-self}} from publicly visible record, which is unacceptable. Merging histories could be an option which possibly would go against one Incnis Mrsi’s ideas, but could preserve the attribution chain. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 07:28, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

ok, you are probably correct about the missing notification to you about my reversal. So, sorry for that.
For me this was just a quality issue. --Túrelio (talk) 10:30, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Willem Bartel van der Kooi - De minnebriefEdit

Sehr geehrter Túrelio,

gestern, 20. Oktober um 17:22 Uhr, haben Sie die Datei File:Willem Bartel van der Kooi - De minnebrief.jpg gelöscht und diese Seite weitergeleitet nach File:De minnebrief Rijksmuseum SK-A-1064.jpeg.

Die erste (gelöschte) Datei ist in die Orginal-Große von 5.708 x 6.934 Pixel, die letztere in einer Große von nur 2.164 × 2.652 Pixel. Ich habe probiert um die Datei "De minnebrief Rijksmuseum SK-A-1064.jpeg" zu überschreiben mit der Datei in die Orginal-Große, aber das ist mir nicht gelungen.

Bitte setzen Sie die Datei in die Orginal-Große zurück.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen, --Bouwe Brouwer (talk) 10:56, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Hallo @Bouwe Brouwer:,
normalerweise würde ich dir natürlich recht geben, dass die höher aufgelöste Version anstelle der geringer aufgelösten bleiben sollte. In diesem Fall habe ich die beiden Dateien aber recht genau verglichen und bemerkt, dass die höher aufgelöste Version von sichtbar schlechterer Qualität war als die andere Version. Deshalb habe ich so gehandelt. Ich kann die gelöschte Version wieder herstellen, wenn du das möchtest; aber trotzdem sollte die aktuelle Version (auch) bleiben, weil sie einfach besser aussieht. (jetzt bin ich aber ca. 2 h offline) --Túrelio (talk) 16:27, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio, ich habe die beide Bilder auch genau verglichen. Die höher aufgelöste Version hat weniger Kratzer und ist farbechter. Siehe zum Beispiel die Augenbraue des Jungen: Die niedriger aufgelöste Version hat ein Kratzer durch die Augenbraue, die höher aufgelöste Version nicht. Ein anderes Beispiel ist die Hosen des Jungen: In der höher aufgelösten Version ist die Hose farbecht, bei der niedriger aufgelöste Version tendiert die grüne Hose ein bisschen zu Weiß. Ich denke, es ist besser beide Versionen nebeneinander zu haben. Ich würde mich freuen, wenn du die gelöschte Version wiederherstellen würde. --Bouwe Brouwer (talk) 19:27, 28 October 2018 (UTC).

OK. Restored. --Túrelio (talk) 19:32, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Herzlichen Dank. --Bouwe Brouwer (talk) 20:46, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

4 imagesEdit

Dear Turelio,

Please help review these images if you can.

Thank You for all your help and have a day. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:25, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:32, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank You Turelio and Goodnight from Vancouver. Its 2:43 AM here. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:43, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Ethology Ecology and Evolution imagesEdit

TURELIO, my name is Alberto Ugolini, I am the editor in chief of the scientific journal in the subject. I think you know that EEE is a serious and good scientific journal (formerly Monitore Zoologico Italiano, founded at the endo of '800. I believe that it should be sufficient to convince you that our contribution to Wiki is a serious one. About the images: all the images are submitted together with the reference of their origin. I am sure you can imagine that it is impossible to know who was the author of a picture taken in the early '900! However, in this case we added the name of the person or institution that sent to me the picture. Frankly speaking I don't see any problem of copyright. Please, let me know your opinion taking into account my argumentation. Sincerely Alberto Ugolini Prof of Zoology Editor in Chief of Ethology Ecology & Evolution Dept of Biology University of Firenze Italy +3905527575152 —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2001:760:2C05:45:2DEE:77FB:CA85:D937 (talk) 08:32, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi Prof. Ugolini,
I'll reply at the weekend. --Túrelio (talk) 19:43, 25 October 2018 (UTC)


Hello, This photo is from Globetrotteur17 and The copyright owner has released this work with the correct Creative Commons license. You can check ... Globetrotteur17 ... Album "Dans l'oeil de mon objectif" ... Fabrice Deville Best Regard --Babin bernard (talk) 08:42, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Yeah. I did[4] already what you should have done. :-) --Túrelio (talk) 08:44, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Vandalism on talk pageEdit

Hello, could you please protect my talk page against vandalism by VPN IPs of blocked User Bookworm, Gutmeister and currently active Mendduets. Thanks Satoshi Kondo (talk) 15:16, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

I've semi-protected (no IP-edits) your talkpage for 3 months. --Túrelio (talk) 19:43, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Fehler in BildernEdit

Hallo Túrelio. Erstmal danke für die Reparatur der zwei Bilder (Quellheiligtum Sudelfelsen achteckiges Bau mit Quader aus Kalksinter .jpg und Sudelfelsbrunnen.jpg) von mir gestern. Allerdings habe ich keine Ahnung was mit den Bildern nicht stimmte. Im Moment habe ich keine Kamera und muss das Handy nutzen. Dort habe ich Open Camera drauf. Seltsamerweise scheint der Fehler nicht bei allen Bildern aufzutreten die ich aufnehme. Wenn Du mir eventuell sagen könntest was bei den Bildern nicht stimmte, kann ich die Bilder eventuell in Zukunft auch selbst prüfen und entsprechend reparieren. --Starkiller3010 (talk) 18:40, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Starkiller3010,
beim Upload (oder kurz danach) wird automatisch (Bot) geprüft, ob die Datei irgendwelchen Code (Daten) enthält, der nicht zu dem jeweiligen Format gehört. Falls ja, wird die Datei entsprechend zur Löschung oder Reinigung markiert. Bei JPEG-Dateien, bei denen so etwas anscheinend am häufigsten vorkommt, kann man z.B. mit der Freeware IrfanView solchen "Fremdcode" einfach verlustlos beseitigen, d.h. ohne dass das Bild nochmal komprimiert werden muss. Ich habe keine Ahnung woher dieser Code stammt, es könnte sowohl die Kamera/Handy sein also auch darin oft ohne Benutzereinfluss ablaufende Prozesse. Vielleicht findest du auf COM:Forum jemanden, der dir mehr dazu sagen kann. --Túrelio (talk) 18:50, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
OK. Vielen Dank. Werde mir mal IrfanView besorgen. Mal sehen ob ich das hinbekomme LG --Starkiller3010 (talk) 19:56, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

In case you get flooded with noticesEdit

If you now get flooded with notices whenever someone uses {{PD-1996}}, delete File:U.S. Copyright Office circular 38a.pdf and move File:U.S. Copyright Office circular 38a 2.pdf in its place.

That's actually not a bad idea anyway. I had to tack on the "2" just to upload it. The new file was uploaded by my sock, so my sock will be flooded with the useless notices. See phab:T46787 for details. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:28, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Ähem. Just to understand what you are saying. I shall delete the redir of File:U.S. Copyright Office circular 38a.pdf to File:U.S. Copyright Office circular 38a 2.pdf, right. And then File:U.S. Copyright Office circular 38a 2.pdf shall be renamed to File:U.S. Copyright Office circular 38a.pdf? --Túrelio (talk) 21:15, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
That is correct. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:22, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 22:46, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

QI featureEdit

Does the QI feature at the top of the image page work? I clicked on it for :File:Pacific Feather Duster Sabellastarte sp.jpg back around 15 Oct or so but can't find it on the QI list. Atsme✍🏻📧 22:13, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

You are referring to the "QI nominator", right? Well, I didn't even know of its existence and have activated it only now in my settings. So, I have no experience with it. Better ask at COM:VP. --Túrelio (talk) 22:29, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Messages about photos without permissions that might be deletedEdit

Dear Turelio,

I just tried sending this message earlier, but it doesn't seem to have registered, so I'm trying again. I'm a new Wikipedia editor, so I'm having trouble understanding the system.

I just now saw that I had received messages from you about photo permissions. One message concerned the page "Chiiori" and a photo of the Floorhearth. I own the copyright for this but don't know how to validate that.

The other messages concerned photos I had uploaded for a new page for "Ronnarong Khampha," (the page is still in "sandbox" stage). The people who took the photos have given verbal permission, but that's all I have. If this is a problem, please delete those photos and I'll upload others later with no copyright problems.

Also - while I was able a few minutes ago to see your messages, now I can't find them anymore. Where do I go on the Wikipedia menu (the alerts, the notices?) to see them again.

I'm sorry that I'm baffled by the Wikipedia system, since I'm just beginning.

October 28, 2018


— Preceding unsigned comment added by Xinqizi (talk • contribs)
Hi Xinqizi,
messages about problems with or questions about your uploads to Commons will be posted to your talkpage User talk:Xinqizi. In the settings for your account on Commons, under the paragraph "notifcations", you can ask to get an automatic email when something is posted to your talkpage. Now to your uploads:
--Túrelio (talk) 11:28, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Dear Turelio,

Thank you for your quick reply. Concerning the photos:

* File:Ronnarong - photo 1.jpg , it will take time to get the permission from Pandit Watanakasivish, so for the time being, please delete this. I already deleted all the photos from the draft of the Ronnarong Khampha page I had created, which is still, I believe, in my "sandbox." But I don't know if they really were deleted. Please take care of that for me. Later, when I get the proper permissions, I'll start over with these photos.
  • File:Chiiori irori floor hearths.jpg, the photo is credited to Alex Kerr, <censored>. I took the picture and I have selectively let certain publications use it to illustrate articles about the house Chiiori in Iya Valley (which belongs to me). I never gave permission to anyone else to use this photo on Wikipedia before, so I can't imagine how it appeared in the "Irori: Jantung Rumah Tradisional Jepang" article earlier. How can I prove this photo is mine and clear it for permission on Wikipedia?
File:"Civilize" 2016.jpg, I'm sorry, I wasn't aware that I had claimed it as my "own work"; that must be one of the mistakes I made in uploading, due to lack of experience with the Wikipedia system. It really was taken by Pravich; I wasn't aware that it had been earlier uploaded to Facebook. It might take some time to get permission from Pravich for this, so please delete for the time being.

Thank you very much, Xinqizi (talk) 16:08, 28 October 2018 (UTC) (Alex Kerr)

Hi Xinqizi,
I've deleted the 1st and 3rd image listed above. I've also "censored" your realname, assuming that you want to retain your pseudonymity in the userspace. WRT your question: if you have a stable email address which is associated with your name, you may simply send an email from it to (OTRS) stating that you are the author and/or rights holder of File:Chiiori irori floor hearths.jpg and want to release it under the choosen free license. The OTRS-volunteers, who treat your email confidentially, will check your email (and eventually ask for more information or not) and after some time will put a so-called OTRS ticket on the image page, and everything is fine. --Túrelio (talk) 17:01, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Dear Turelio,

I'm still getting used to working with the Wikipedia messaging format. I wrote earlier to answer you, but twice my reply seems to have disappeared when I published the changes, so I'm trying again.

Thank you for removing the 2 photos on the Ronnarong Khampha page. I'll upload those later when I get permissions from the photographers. Also thank you for censoring my realname, as I do wish to retain pseudonymity in the userspace. I've sent an email from my personal email address, using the Wikipedia provided email template, granting permission for the use of File:Chiiori irori floor hearths.jpg.

Xinqizi (talk) 18:50, 28 October 2018 (UTC) October 29, 2018

File:Ladina Heimgartner, Direktorin RTR.jpgEdit

Ticket #2018100210003253 has arrived for the image, so please restore it so I can close the ticket. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 23:37, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:00, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

File:MK Shaked(1) 2.jpgEdit

this was photo i have the copy right to it, i took this photo. the photo that ayelet shaked tweeted is a different photo look at the difference, my photo has an israeli flag in the photo the photo ayelete shaked tweeted has NO israeli flag in it as u can see its a different photo taken from a different camera see link:

please restore my photo, because i own the copyrights to it thanks

just because someone tweeted a similar photo, does not mean that my photo is the same photo, look at both photos, you can clearly see, its taken from 2 different cameras.

also notice my photo was taken "Horizontal" the photo that shaked tweeted was taken "Vertical" clearly 2 different photos.

--Joecento (talk) 07:25, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Honestly, I am not really convinced, as all the depicted persons show the same facial features/expressions in both images. Anyway, I'll undelete the image and put it in a regular deletion-request, which gives you time to defend your position and doesn't base the final decision on my personal opinion. --Túrelio (talk) 07:40, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
So, here you are: Commons:Deletion requests/File:MK Shaked(1) 2.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 07:52, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

I can show you another photo i took with my camera, they were all smiling for 1 minute so all photos taken look the same, but my photos that i took, where taken from my camera. there were a few people in the room with cameras.

you can clearly see its taken from a different angle from the photo that alyelet shaked tweeted see this link:

where is the form to defend my photo ? --Joecento (talk) 07:56, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

At the above posted link: Commons:Deletion requests/File:MK Shaked(1) 2.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 07:58, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

@Túrelio when does the deletion request expire ? it's already 30 days since the photo was uploaded. --Joecento (talk) 08:29, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Joecento, as I opened this DR, it wouldn't be good to decide it by myself. However, I've now suggested keep-closure. May still take some time, as the deciding admin has to go through the whole discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 10:15, 28 November 2018 (UTC)


This photo was deleted and was not copyrighted, it belongs to a friend of mine (the person on the photo).

If you think it has copyright, so YOU have to PROVE it!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by RyuuzakiL5 (talk • contribs)
Hi RyuuzakiL5,
sorry, but you are in error. You, the uploader, has to prove that his uploads are under the claimed free license.
By your above statement you have confirmed that this image is not your work, contrary to your statement at upload, when you claimed it as own work.
Today every work of art is copyrighted. Only the author/photographer or the rightsholder can release it under a free license (which does not mean it's not copyrighted).
So, if you received the image by Chris Tonietto, who has it also on her Facebook page[5], you need to ask her to send a statement of permission to in which she needs to confirm that she is the rights holder and that she agrees to release this image under the choosen cc-by-sa license. --Túrelio (talk) 17:16, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

1 imageEdit

Dear Turelio,

Please review this image when you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:12, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Thank You, Turelio--Leoboudv (talk) 21:16, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Have a good night in Germany Turelio, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:16, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

You are welcome. Have you seen this? (not fungi, but nice dog-shots from home). --Túrelio (talk) 21:19, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
  • The new 2019 Vancouver Police 2019 calendar. Very cool indeed!. I did not see it until now. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:24, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Professeur Nathalie Ros.jpg; you have deleted this image I have uploaded as an illustration in my project of contribution "Nathalie Ros" because you have found it on a website (Koufa Foundation) and thought there was a copyright violation. I have taken this picture myself and I offered it to Nathalie Ros in order for her to use it in her CV; I am the autor and not Koufa Foundation that has no copyright on this image.Edit

Professeur Nathalie Ros.jpg; you have deleted this image I have uploaded as an illustration in my project of contribution "Nathalie Ros" because you have found it on a website (Koufa Foundation) and thought there was a copyright violation. I have taken this picture myself and I offered it to Nathalie Ros in order for her to use it in her CV; I am the autor and not Koufa Foundation that has no copyright on this image.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lagrimardière (talk • contribs) 10:00, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Turelio, please, I am a beginner, so could you be so kind to explain me how I could proof that the picture is mine?--Lagrimardière (talk) 09:03, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Lagrimardière:, as this image has now been deleted twice by different admins, you need to request its undeletion at COM:UDR.
How to proof your authorship: one way would be to ask Prof. Nathalie Ros to confirm it from her official email address towards (OTRS). If that doesn't seem possible, you might upload the native image file (as it came out of your digital camera). This one can later be deleted. --Túrelio (talk) 07:34, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

File: Peggy-Sue in Zuid-AfrikaEdit

Dear Túrelio, you marked this picture as a copyright violation referring to an instagram account. That is my instagram account and the picture is made with my camera. Therefor I'm entitled to the photograph and I'm free to use it. Thanks, P. --Psfv2018 (talk) 09:25, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi Psfv2018,
ok. Anyway, as it has been found on Instagram, you should send an email from your Instagram-Account to just confirming that it is your work and you uploaded it by yourself or agreed to have it uploaded to Commons under the choosen free license. However, I should warn you that this image might be considered promotional and nominated for deletion, especially if it's not used in a Wikipedia article. --Túrelio (talk) 09:40, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Revdel requestsEdit

Can you please revdel the intermediate versions on File:IMI Kolkata view.png as they are copyright, see e.g. I see you warned the uploader multiple times, but they keep overwriting files and uploading copyright protected images. They were already indef blocked on enwiki for similar behaviour. --Muhandes (talk) 14:44, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Copyvio deleted. User:Santanu99 blocked for 1 week. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 14:53, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. There is another revision under File:IMI Kolkata view.png with the same issue. There are also revisions under File:Flagofraw.JPG, File:India-Kolkata-locator-map.PNG, File:Flag of Central Industrial Security Force.jpg which I suspect are copyvio due to sophisticated logo. Since all other uploads are copyvio I also suspect File:Kazi Nazrul University Asansol.jpg. --Muhandes (talk) 14:59, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 16:24, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. --Muhandes (talk) 17:01, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Use of your Flock of Sheep in Cologne imageEdit

First of all, I love this photo!

We are using this image for a non-profit blog guest post by Joseph Frankovic on Faith and Forests, link will be live on 3 November 2018 at 9 am EDT -

Thank you!!! —Preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 18:40, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 09:15, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Gymnopus foetidus (Sowerby) P.M. Kirk 953174.jpgEdit

Dear Turelio,

Please review this single image when you can. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:12, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:16, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks again for your kind help Turelio. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:05, 3 November 2018 (UTC)


Hello Túrelio,

I see you deleted the updated logo File:Schokinag Logo.jpg that I had uploaded for it to be included in the following article. I am working on the article on behalf of the company itself, since the current article is highly outdated. The company gave permission to use the logo in the article. Of course the logo is, as any company logo, under copyright. However, Wikipedia is full of company logos and even though I did read the guidelines on this topic, I cannot understand what it takes for the logo picture to be allowed in a Wikipedia article. Could you please explain this to us? I read in some previous talks that you told someone that a confirmation of the rightsholdership needs to be sent to Would that solve the problem? We would really like to include the logo and I will be looking forward to receiving your indications about this.

Thank you very much in advance.

Best regards, Alesschoki (talk) 13:47, 6 November 2018 (UTC)Alesschoki

Hallo Alesschoki,
du schreibst ja anscheinend auf deutsch. Also, Logos sind generell eine schwierige Angelegenheit. Auf :de (lokal) wurden sie lange irgendwie toleriert, obwohl die rechtliche Lage eher klar dagegen sprach. Bei dem nun gelöschten Logo File:Schokinag Logo.jpg könnte man diskutieren, ob das überhaupt ausreichend Schöpfungshöhe aufweist, um urheberrechtlich geschützt zu sein. Das ist meist eine schwierige Frage, wenn man kein entsprechendes Gerichtsurteil dazu hat. Du schreibst, dass du die Genehmigung der Firma für "use the logo in the article" hast. Solche "Wikipedia-only"-Genehmigungen werden auf Commons aber grundsätzlich nicht zugelassen. D.h., du brauchst eine allgemeine Freigabe unter einer freien Lizenz (siehe COM:L), die eine Firma natürlich ungern geben wird. Wir setzen auf Logo-Bilder zwar immer auch den Trademark-Baustein; ob das in einem Rechtsstreit um mißbräuchliche Nutzung ausreicht, ist aber nicht klar. Am einfachsten wäre es noch, wenn du das Logo irgendwo im Freien angebracht findest; dann kannst es nämlich via Panoramafreiheit aufnehmen und hochladen. --Túrelio (talk) 16:50, 6 November 2018 (UTC)


Please undelete as we have now got a ticket for this image. Please ping me, Thanks. Ww2censor (talk) 23:55, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

@Ww2censor:,   Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:07, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Category:1567 in Champagne-ArdenneEdit

Bonjour Túrelio, pourquoi supprimer Category:1940 in Champagne-Ardenne ? C'est une catégorie qui existe pour les siècles précédents, pour les régions voisines, BOurgogne, Alsace...Lors de la création en 2016 de Grand est les régions existantes précédentes, comme Chamapgne-ardenne y sont renvoyées comme histoire du Grand est et référencées aussi par Champagne-ardenne par année. Si c'est une question de respect des régions administratives existantes à cette époque alors ce serait plutôt la Généralité de Chaalons qui était pertinentes pour l'ancien régime et les coutumes de Vitry et XXX pour le juridique. Cordialement Garitan (talk) 14:01, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Garitan:, sorry, but I have do write in english. I've just deleted empty categories that had been tagged for speedy deletion. There are many more of these in Category:Other speedy deletions. It seems most or all of them had been nominated by User:Olybrius. May be you should talk to him about whether his category-edits make sense or should be reverted. In the latter case, I can undelete all recently deleted categories of that type. --Túrelio (talk) 19:51, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Category:1308 in MarneEdit

Bonjour Túrelio, pourquoi supprimer Category:1308 in Marne ? Bad name ? En 1308 la Marne n'est qu'un fleuve, pas une région. C'est une catégorie qui existe pour les siècles précédents, pour les régions voisines, BOurgogne, Alsace...Lors de la création en 2016 de Grand est les régions existantes précédentes, comme Champagne-ardenne y sont renvoyées comme histoire du Grand est et référencées aussi par Champagne-ardenne par année. Si c'est une question de respect des régions administratives existantes à cette époque alors ce serait plutôt la Généralité de Chaalons qui était pertinentes pour l'ancien régime et les coutumes de Vitry et Reims pour le juridique. Cordialement Garitan (talk) 14:01, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour Túrelio, pourquoi modifier Category:1435 in Reims ? Bad name ? En 1435 la Marne n'est qu'un fleuve, pas une région. C'est une catégorie qui existe pour les siècles précédents, pour les régions voisines comme Alsace by year le respect de 1435 in Alsace existe, alors ?...Lors de la création en 2016 de Grand est les régions existantes précédentes, comme Champagne-ardenne y sont renvoyées comme histoire du Grand est et référencées aussi par Champagne-ardenne par année. Si c'est une question de respect des régions administratives existantes à cette époque alors ce serait plutôt la Généralité de Chaalons qui était pertinentes pour l'ancien régime et les coutumes de Vitry et Reims pour le juridique. Cordialement Garitan (talk) 14:16, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Valentina Lombardo.pngEdit

Another undelete request. Ticket#2018110610004074 has been submitted. Please ping me when done. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 10:20, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

@Ww2censor:,   Done. --Túrelio (talk) 10:35, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Image of Jean-Marc Martel (Professeur).Edit

Hello Túrelio,

Yesterday, you removed the image Jeanmarcmartel.jpg from the page i am currently developping. I actually have an email sent by the author of that picture authorizing it's edition on Wiki. This man is Marc Robitaille, a professionnal photographer, actually retired. So, I don't know how I could resubmit that picture in accordance with the rules.

Michel Dubois, mcmichel,

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcmichel (talk • contribs) 19:43, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Mcmichel,
has the photographer Marc Robitaille put the image under a free license or just permitted to use it on Wikipedia? The latter is not accepted. It needs to be released under a free license, see COM:L. If he has done that, please forward (or ask him to send it directly) to . --Túrelio (talk) 22:41, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Amal Fathy.jpgEdit

Dear Turelio,

Could you please undo the deleting action of Amal Fathy.jpg on Amal Fathy page. My apology for not having reacted on time. This photo is a property of her family that I am editing this page on their behalf: her husband Mohamed Lotfy.

Thank you and my best regards,

Egyptian Libertarian.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Egyptian Libertarian (talk • contribs) 15:06, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Athanasio Celia - PhotoEdit

Cher Turelio, je suis le propriétaire légitime des droits d'auteur de cette photo... s'il vous plaît ajouter la photo à nouveau.(Copyright © 2006-2018 by ArtSlant, Inc. All images and content remain the © of their rightful owners.)... "All images and content remain the 'copyright' of their rightful owners".

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyriaki Verrou (talk • contribs) 01:33, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi @Kyriaki Verrou:, sorry, I need to reply in english. Do I understand you correctly, that you shot the original photo File:A. Celia & Verticalismus.jpg by yourself? If yes, there is still the problem, that the photo shows (in its middle[6]) a copyrighted artwork of a living artist. So, you need to provide to a statement of permission by Athanasio Celia that he agrees that you put your photo showing his work of art under a free license that allows other to use it. --Túrelio (talk) 07:19, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

-- Lieber Turelio (ich gehe davon aus dass Sie ein Herr sind), ich habe gelesen dass Ihre Muttersprache Deutsch ist, also fühle ich mich frei Ihnen auf Deutsch zu antworten... Ja, das Foto habe ich selbst mit meiner eigenen Kamera aufgenommen, als langjährige Mitarbeiterin von Herrn Celia. Ich füge Ihnen durch den folgenden veröffentlichen Link ( ) auch die Erlaubnis von Athanasio Celia bei, damit das bestimmte Foto frei genutzt werden darf. Ich hoffe Sie fügen dieses den biografischen Daten bei. Mit Bestem Dank im Voraus.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyriaki Verrou (talk • contribs) 17:31, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Hallo Kyriaki,
ich habe die o.g. Erlaubnis von Herrn Celia an die OTRS-Abteilung weitergeleitet, die sich um Genehmigungen kümmert. Die Arbeit wird auch dort ausschließlich von Freiwilligen gemacht, weshalb es etwas dauern kann. Das Foto habe ich wiederhergestellt. --Túrelio (talk) 19:29, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Hallo @Kyriaki Verrou:
ich habe soeben eine erste Antwort von OTRS erhalten, in der sie die Genehmigung leider als unzureichend bewerten. Am besten machst du eine neue, unter Benutzug folgender Vorlage Commons:E-Mail-Vorlagen#Einverständniserklärung_(Rechte-Inhaber) und mit Bezug auf die Ticket# 2018111210010144 und schickst sie an Herr Celia muss eigentlich nur bestätigen, dass er damit einverstanden ist, dass dein Foto von ihm mit seinen Gemälden im Hintergrund unter der von dir gewählten freien Lizenz verbreitet werden darf. --Túrelio (talk) 11:51, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Portuguesa de DesportosEdit

Hi, I uploaded a picture called "Escudo da Portuguesa de Desportos" which was deleted. The picture refers to a brazilian football club logo, so I think that should be considered a public image. I am going to upload it again and embed it into the club page at Wikipedia, since the old logo, which is defuncted since 2014, is still there and needs to be changed.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabio J. Evangelista (talk • contribs) 13:36, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Fabio J. Evangelista,
"public" has no relevance with regard to copyright. The page, from wich you took this logo, is not under a free license.[7] How old is this logo? --Túrelio (talk) 13:40, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply Turélio,

this logo is from 1994 and was readopted in 2014. I found another source, this time from the oficial club site [8]. Can I upload it? Is there something I need to write in the upload form?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabio J. Evangelista (talk • contribs) 13:53, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
I fear, no. This site clearly states "Associação Portuguesa de Desportos © 2018 – Todos os direitos reservado". So, the only possibility seems to be, that you ask them directly for a permission. See here for a template. Important: the permission has to be avlid for everybody, not only for Wikipedia. --Túrelio (talk) 14:00, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi Turélio, I looked for the old image page in Commons [9] and it refers to the same link I posted before [10]. Since the logo was updated, the link refers to a different picture now. The following notes were added to the picture page:

"This image, or text, is presented, is made only of simple geometric shapes or text. Are not limited to the originality necessary for the protection of rights. It must be open to restrictive restrictions. See WP: PD # PD-textlogo fonts or discussion for more information."

"This image of simple geometry is ineligible in copyright and therefore in the public domain, because it consists entirely of information that is common property and does not contain any original authorship."

"This work contains materials in which you may be subject to trademark laws in one or more jurisdictions. Before using this content, please make sure that you have the rights to use it under the circumstances that you intend to use. You are solely responsible for ensuring that no rights in this trademark are disregarded. See our general warning. The use of this trademark does not indicate the holder's endorsement by Wikimedia Commons or the Wikimedia Foundation, nor vice versa."

Can I upload the new logo adding the same notes in the upload form?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabio J. Evangelista (talk • contribs) 14:28, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
IMO not, as the new logo looks less conventional to me than the old one File:Portuguesa de Desportos.png. However, guessing whether something shows enough creativity to be copyrightable, i.e. above the threshold of originality, is often a judgement call. If you simply upload it instead of asking the owner for a permission, you are risking that someone else will nominate it for deletion. So, it's your decision. The {{trademark}} should always be added to logo uploads, but it doesn't refer to the copyright-question. --Túrelio (talk) 14:42, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Bruno Henrique SEPEdit

Baixei a foto diretamente do Site da Sociedade Esportiva Palmeiras, e creditei o autor como Cesar Greco, conforme consta no site, coloquei o link da foto, mas não vi que tinha no Flick, quanto as outras fotos da pagina da cidade de Antonio Carlos SC, são fotos de dominio publico, distriubuidads em calendarios, apenas foram escaneadas.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulitharlis (talk • contribs) 14:57, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello Turelio, I downloaded the image of Bruno Henrique directly from the site of the Sociedade Esportiva Palmeiras, and I credited the author as Cesar Greco, Why this is a violation of rights, if it is on the site and can be downloaded.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulitharlis (talk • contribs) 15:01, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, the mere fact that an image can be found/seen on a website, has no meaning for its copyright. The link which you provided for File:Bruno Henrique SEP.jpg leads actually to the Flickr page, where the image is labeled as "All rights reserved". I do not say/think that you did intentionally link to a copyrighted image. However, you claimed that this image is without copyright (CC-0). For images, which are not truly your own work, you cannot do this if you are not absolutely sure. --Túrelio (talk) 15:07, 12 November 2018 (UTC)


Hallo Túrelio,
kannst Du mir bitte bei folgenden Fragen helfen:
Gibt es einen Bot, der Duplikate findet?
Kann man ganze Kategorien mit Duplikaten löschen (z.B. hier: Category:Wild Flowers - Pratt (duplicates) oder ist nur der Weg über Einzelbilder mit "dupe" möglich?
Dank und Grüße. Orchi (talk) 16:52, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi Orchi,
also, ich weiß zwar vom duplicate detector, der zielt aber auf Textvergleich. Sonst ist mir zumindest kein Dupe-Finder bekannt. Frag vielleicht mal auf dem Forum oder der VP.
Das gilt analog für Datei-Mengen in einer Kategorie. Das Massen-Löschtool setzt allein beim Hochlader an, d.h. es kann massenweise Dateien eines Hochladers löschen, aber nicht Dateien, die nur eine Kategorie als Gemeinsamkeit haben. --Túrelio (talk) 17:10, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
...vielen Dank für Deine schnelle Antwort. Dann wird man wohl noch eine zeitlang mit den endlosen Doppel- und Mehrfachhochladungen von Automaten zurecht kommen müssen. :- ( Orchi (talk) 17:22, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Novo Logo CCREdit

Olá Turélio,

Somos da empresa de marketing que cuida da conta do Grupo CCR.

Nos solicitaram a troca do logo que se encontra nessa página pois na busca via Google é uma das primeiras que aparece.

A empresa sofreu uma alteração no seu logo, pequena, mas precisa ser alterada. Caso necessite confirmar essa alteração verá o mesmo em uso aqui...

Fiz a inclusao do novo logo no dia 12/10/2018 e inicialmente pareceu que um bot tinha feito a retirada por infringir direitos de marca, mas procurando melhor verifiquei que você excluiu o mesmo (

Caso não possa reverter isso para que possamos trocar por favor nos oriente a melhor forma de fazer essa alteração.

Muito obrigado


Heads Proapganda

— Preceding unsigned comment added by MKTCCR (talk • contribs) 17:56, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
I reply in english as I don't talk portuguese.
The problem with File:Logo CCR.jpg was that you hadn't added any license template and that the source says "© COPYRIGHT 2018 - CCR - GRUPO - TODOS OS DIREITOS RESERVADOS."
So, you need to provide a statement of permission from Grupo CCR to in which they need to state that they are either the creator or the rightsholder of that logo and that they give permission to have it uploaded to Commons under a free license, such as cc-by-sa-4.0 . --Túrelio (talk) 21:47, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

3 imagesEdit

Dear Turelio,

Please review these 3 images when you can.

Thank You for your time, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:14, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Thank You for your help Turelio. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:21, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Waltzing Tilda - Theatrical release poster.jpgEdit

Hey, I'm dealing with Ticket#2018111310012122 regarding the mentioned file. Can you undelete it so that I can address the request? Regards. --Mhhossein talk 12:46, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Mhhossein:,   Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:58, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. --Mhhossein talk 16:23, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Sarah Cohen Scali photoEdit

Dear Túrelio,

Two days ago you deleted the picture Sarah_Cohen-Scali.jpg, uploaded with the account 3Cpasteur because of a copywright violation. Thank you for taking care, but in this case the accusation is wrong. I am the owner of the picture and I uploaded it for free use. I took the picture of a public people, in a public place, my school as Sarah Cohen-Scali was talking to my pupils. She knew I was taking pictures, and the first occurrence of this picture was on our school website at this address : Other occurrences are copies of my work.


Christine Sobota Collège Louis-Pasteur 21506 Montbard


— Preceding unsigned comment added by 3Cpasteur (talk • contribs) 17:14, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Bonjour @3Cpasteur:,
ok, this seems credible to me. However, you should not simply have re-uploaded this image, as it had been deleted as (assumed) copyvio. The correct way would have been to file the image at Commons:Undeletion requests. (Just for the next time this happens.) In case my admin-colleague, who had tagged this image as suspected copyvio, asks you about the re-upload, you may direct him to this discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 19:46, 17 November 2018 (UTC)


I saw that you deleted some of the images of which I have requested the deletion with criterion G7. I want to thank you very much for your work and also to apologise to have give you a lost of time because of my big mistake in uploading images from Flickr. Greetings, --Civitas13 (talk) 09:23, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

request for undelete fileEdit

Dear Túrelio, you have deleted one of my file on commons can you tell me why you delete it ? and Have you contact me before delete it ? all images taken by me from my camera and i own the copyrights of it so please recover the files and let me know when it will be done. thank you and appreciate it hope next time before you delete anyone image you sshould contact them wait for them to response and this way we can contribute all good work and make community more friendly and stay.

Thank youTris T7 08:55, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tris T7 (talk • contribs)
Hi @Tris T7:,
as I see from your talkpage, you had been notified about the speedy-deletion request for File:King Power Group กลุ่มบริษัท คิง เพาเวอร์ Photographed by Trisorn Triboon 03.jpg. Speedy-deletion requests do not require to wait for feedback from the uploader. Anyway, the problem was not that anybody doubted that you shot the photo by yourself. The copyright problem consists in that you made a photo of a copyrighted work, i.e. a derivative. Except in cases that fall under the local freedom-of-panorama exception, this requires a permission from the original copyright-holder. You will find a practical instruction at COM:CB. --Túrelio (talk) 09:36, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

So Meaning If i have got permission in writing from Walt Disney Thailand i would allow to upload them ? One thing i do not understand as Thai Law we allow to use them because Event for public especially i am press for the events that mean they allow me to contribution it ? what about if i change license as this file ? will it be ok ? hope you can explain for me to understand about it.. thank you in advance. Tris T7 10:20, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

There are 2 important principles to obey here:
1) Wikipedia and Wikimedia-Commons are NOT "press". So, laws "for press/media" do not apply. In addition, our licensing policy COM:L requires that all uploads to Commons can legally be used by everybody, who complies with the license terms, for any kind of use, including commercial use. The use of typical "press photos" is usually restricted to reporting about the related item or event and are thereby not allowed on Commons/Wikipedia.
2) Only the copyright owner/holder can give a license/permission. So, you need to ask the legal department of Walt Disney Thailand to give you the permission to release your own photo, showing their content, under the choosen free license, which has to be sent to Important: do not ask a "permission for Wikipedia", we will not accept this. --Túrelio (talk) 10:31, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

2 images reviewEdit

Dear Turelio,

If you have time, please check if you can review these 2 images please?

Regarding the second Bebe image, youtube blocks me from viewing it in Canada. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:12, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

  Done; never done this before. --Túrelio (talk) 22:01, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank You Turelio. At least you can view the YT video in Germany. Its blocked in Canada. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:31, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

File Deletion: DWCSJlogo.pngEdit

Hi! I notice you deleted my file uploaded to Wikimedia Commons with filename: DWCSJlogo.png on ground of licensing I was just wondering, what license tag should I use? I found the logo at I tried to contact the website administrators regarding copyright owner of the image, but no response yet. I was wondering if I could use the tag {{Fairuse}} or {{Non-free logo}} since the image is in lower resolution in just under 150px (approx)? Can I also use the tag {{PD-Philippines}}? I am new to licensing policies so any info would be appreciated.

Thanks :)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Moonrivers (talk • contribs) 10:06, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi @Moonrivers:, your upload came from the website, which is clearly labeled as "Copyright © 2018 Divine Word College of San Jose. All Rights Reserved". So, if we consider the seal/logo as copyrightable, you need a permission from its creator or copyright-holder. Fair-use is not an option, as Commons does/cannot allow fair-use material. Also, I doubt that PD-Philippines is applicable here. --Túrelio (talk) 20:03, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Túrelio: thanks for this info! If I mention the full name of the copyright owner on source or author section then use copyright tag Creative Commons Attribution 2.0, would it be possible to reconsider deletion of the file?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Moonrivers (talk • contribs) 17:19, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, no. The copyright-holder needs to release the work under a free license. This has to be credibly proven by a statement from the author either to OTRS ( or on a website under his/her control. --Túrelio (talk) 19:51, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Benutzername "klandrea"Edit

Hallo Túrelio,

danke für Dein ausführliches Feedback zu den gelöschten Bildern. Macht es demnach Sinn meinen Nickname "klandrea" in "Klaus Hellmerich" umzuändern, oder langt diese Bestätigungsmail aus (in der Wikipedia-Hilfe wird ja explizit genannt, dass man entweder den Nickname in einen Realnamen oder umgekehrt, ändern kann)? Muss ich die Bilder (nach meiner Bestätigungsmail) nochmals hochladen oder werden diese dann durch einen Kollegen wieder sichtbar gemacht?

Danke für die "Nachhilfe" und viele Grüße :-)

Klaus Hellmerich

Klandrea (talk) 07:04, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Hallo @Klandrea:,
nein, du musst das nicht ändern und du musst die Identität auch nicht öffentlich darlegen oder erklären. Es reicht, diese gegenüber OTRS zu bestätigen. Allerdings wäre es hilfreich, wenn du dir überlegst, ob du hier nur eigene Fotos hochladen willst oder auch fremde (unter freier Lizenz versteht sich). Im ersteren Fall wäre es gut, wenn du das in deiner Bestätigungsmail an OTRS so schreibst, damit nach zukünftigen Uploads der OTRS-Prozess nicht wieder neu angestoßen werden muss. Die gelöschten Bilder musst du nicht neu hochladen. Ich kann sie mit wenigen Klicks ent-löschen, sobald ich von OTRS ein Zeichen bekommen. --Túrelio (talk) 08:46, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Latin lambdaEdit

Hi, Túrelio! Was there a prior discussion about this? -- Tuválkin 08:41, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Good morning, don't think so. This cat had been created and SD-requested the same day by User:1234qwer1234qwer4. I can recreate it, if required. --Túrelio (talk) 08:43, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Must be a trick there, then. I recategorized this users’ (mostly fanciful) latin lambda images a few months ago, creating categories that cover the confusion between "ʎ" and "ƛ" (and "λ", of course) that included the word "misdrawn". This user made some changes later but I had to postpone further analysis and discussion for a leter time because I was busy with other stuff. The matter seemed to be forgotten (by both sides, I confess), but now this. -- Tuválkin 12:40, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

4 imagesEdit

Dear Turelio,

Please review these images when you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:50, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:50, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank You for your kind help Turelio. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:03, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

ANEFO images duplicatesEdit

~~I geuss you was not aware but when you redirect a file that was uploaded from pkiwiki like this one File:PikiWiki Israel 51557 a street in the south of tel aviv.jpg And you change the name to something else like File:Jaffa Een aanTel Aviv grenzende straat met winkels en winkelend publiek, Bestanddeelnr 255-1304.jpg The file is lost to pikiwiki And you get an empty file

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaula (talk • contribs) 09:58, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Shaula,
quite a number of images, which had previously been uploaded from PikiWiki, were tagged as duplicates (not by me), as a batch of images from the Dutch ANEFO collection, sometimes in higher resolution, had been uploaded. When processed as a duplicate, a redirect from the now deleted image to the remaining one is created, so that neither internally nor externally a 404 should result when the old filename is called. --Túrelio (talk) 10:18, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

~~ where can I find all the knesset pictures that you removed?????????????

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaula (talk • contribs) 10:31, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Did you read my above coment?
You could just follow the redirect. Go to File:Jaffa Een aanTel Aviv grenzende straat met winkels en winkelend publiek, Bestanddeelnr 255-1304.jpg, scroll to the bottom of the page, where you see in the last line the redirect to File:PikiWiki Israel 51557 a street in the south of tel aviv.jpg.
If this is a systematic problem, I would recommend you to talk to User:Vysotsky, who identifies all duplicates of the ANEFO images and tags them for duplicate-deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 10:36, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Thank you both. Túrelio is correct. To give an example: this file now includes the data of the PikiWiki image, incl. English and Hebrew description, and PikiWiki reference and number. I chose this method because the ANEFO updates contain more and better information, such as a link to the original file at the Dutch National Archives, current license and the correct name of the photographer. Vysotsky (talk) 10:48, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
I now see the problem, and will stop "duplicating" the PikiWiki files until I have found a solution for the linking problem. I will fix the old cases. Vysotsky (talk) 13:38, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. That would be great. --Túrelio (talk) 14:04, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Discussion continued at talk page of User:Shaula. Vysotsky (talk) 14:32, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

File:La Bella y las Bestias - Isabela sufre un atentado que casi la mata.webmEdit

The video that you deleted has a Creative Commons Attribution License (allowed reuse). So what is the reason to erase it?--Philip J Fry (talk) 10:22, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Philip J Fry: seems you are correct. I've restored the image. --Túrelio (talk) 21:02, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
You are deleting content without realizing the templates. An IP is placing massive templates to destroy for annoying. For example, File:Y mañana será otro día.png, File:LaMamádel10.png ‎, File:Sharon la Hechicera.png, File:Laqueridadelcentauro.png and more. Then, you should see in detail the templates of those files that you deleted. Or at least open a delete query before deleting files massively.--Philip J Fry (talk) 10:35, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, but here you are wrong. I considered all these logos and found them clearly not to be mere text logos, as opposed to File:La reina del flow logotipo.png for example. I can put them in a regular DR, but I have no doubt about the outcome. --Túrelio (talk) 11:20, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
I've edited them so they look simpler.--Philip J Fry (talk) 18:34, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks - fehl.Lizenz Luftbild SteinberghaffEdit

Hallo Túrelio, vielen Dank für Hinweis auf fehlenden Lizenzbaustein - Anm.; bin ganz im Norden gelandet. Dir frohes Schaffen, Moin und Gruß Wolfgang Pehlemann (talk) 09:52, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

9 imagesEdit

OTRS ticket for File:Leslie Jackson Chihuly Boathouse 10-15-2018.jpgEdit

Please restore this file because it now has Ticket#2018112110010707. BTW, I responded to your post on my talk page. Ww2censor (talk) 11:10, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 11:56, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Gymnopus subsulphureus (Peck) Murrill 336894.jpgEdit

Dear Turelio,

Please review this single image when you can. Thank You for your time. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:12, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)   Done   --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:56, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment: Thank You so much Hedwig in Washington! This was my last one. I uploaded it more than 1 day ago but forgot to ask Turelio about it. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:34, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Flickr washing by User:Susangrigg1Edit

Many of these uploads are sourced from when the rights are obviously invalid. I find some for Lorin Morgan-Richards here on Facebook. I just don't have the time to hunt them all down. Secondarywaltz (talk) 23:50, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

2 imagesEdit

Dear Thiotrix,

If you have 1 minute, please kindly review these images. They are of a species that Commons has no images of.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:23, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:14, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank You Turelio for your kind help. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:19, 29 November 2018 (UTC)


How did you delete my photo? I'm crying right now. 09:43, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

As an IP you cannot upload anything to Commons; so, I cannot have deleted it. Otherwise, log-in and state clearly about what you are talking. --Túrelio (talk) 10:26, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of image taken from a scientific journal with proper citationEdit

Hi Turelio,

You recently deleted an image from a wikipage that I am editing, citing that it was missing a license. However, considering that it is an image of chemical structures of a figure from a paper, I am under the impression that there are no potential copyright violations here, particularly since I provided the proper citation for its use. If you could clarify for me what the issue is here that would be much appreciated!


Jenglish18 (talk) 20:36, 29 November 2018 (UTC) Justin

(talk page stalker) Crediting the source and authors is not sufficient. Any upload here must either be out of copyright due to old age or being much too simple, or it needs to have a free licence from the original authors. This article in the Journal of Clinical Investigation does not seem to come with free licence, so you're not allowed to republish its content. De728631 (talk) 23:03, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

1 imageEdit

Dear Thiotrix, Please review this single image when you can.

Thank You for your time. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:37, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

  Done. BTW: Have you translated my Quenya username into Gaulish language? --Túrelio (talk) 07:26, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment: Thanks for your help Turelio. No I haven't used the Quenya username. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:40, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

File:CWSF Best Project (Downscaled).jpgEdit

Hi, can you figure out what happened with this deletion request? It's not in the article history any more... Thanks! --Randykitty (talk) 22:55, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi Randykitty,
the nominated one was duplicate-processed (aka deleted) to the current higher-resolution version, which will also be deleted due to copyvio-suspicion. --Túrelio (talk) 07:07, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Permission to use image of File:MotherTeresa_090.jpg in a video empowering womens voices for internet usageEdit

Hi Túrelio,

I would love to use your image of Mother Teresa in a video to empower women's voices for web and social media usage.

Please let me know if this is okay?

Kind regards,


— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ceriannejones (talk • contribs) 23:55, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi Ceri,
sure. Feel free to do so. Just try to credit me in the video. --Túrelio (talk) 07:05, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

1 imageEdit

Dear Turelio,

Please review this image when you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:31, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:06, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank You Turelio. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:29, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Category:Uncategorized images of temples was emptied out by pushing everything back into the main categoryEdit

The category had a template {{empty category}}. It was also quite full. User:Tm came along and pushed all the media back into the main Category:Temples. He also reverted my re-addition of {{empty category}}. There are many such "uncategorized" categories in Wikimedia Commons. User:Tm seems to have a problem with it without ever telling anyone why, after having been asked about it several times. I would like this category to be undeleted and the media restored.

Reasons why to have "uncategorized images of...." categories
The reasons why I suggest having these "uncategorized images of...." categories is because: 1. Having main categories that are "clean" encourages many uploaders to actually categorise their uploads into more correct categories themselves instead of just piling them onto the multitudes that are already there, 2. Uncategorized images can now be found via the category system so people who enjoy categorizing media can find them easier, 3. Having vast amounts of uncategorized media in main categories can bring problems for computers that are slow or for people who have slow internetbconnections, 4. Having many uncategorised images in the main category can be confusing for new users who try to search for media via the category system, 5. Uploaders who upload media to main categories tend to to be new and often, the categories that they place their media in tend to often be incorrect (as in needing much further categorisation). - Takeaway (talk) 20:41, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

@Takeaway: Then categorize them properly, instead of burying away the problem and if you identify what or where the image depicts, move them to unidentified categories, instead of creating a parallel category, just to "show" and clean the main room, but bury the "garbage" to a backroom. Tm (talk) 20:44, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
I categorise many images as my stats will show. I have hardly ever had any problems with my categorisations unlike User:Tm as his talk page shows, and also counting the numerous times people complained about him on the Admin boards. - Takeaway (talk) 20:47, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
If someone seems highly concerned about getting a high edit count, it would be user:Tm. My style is quite different and much slower because I actually care about (most) of the media that I categorise and want to do them justice. - Takeaway (talk) 21:01, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Just to recap what this is actually all about: I am asking to have Category:Uncategorized images of ...., and not have them deleted whenever user:Tm comes around. They do that by either pushing the media back to the main category, or, as they often did, push them into "unidentified images of..." category, or they go on a frenzied categorising spree as they are doing now with Category:Uncategorized images of Bangkok to empty it out as quickly as possible and request it to be deleted just to prove the point . - Takeaway (talk) 21:16, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) You might want to make this a wider discussion. I have been part of several discussions where the consensus was to leave uncategorized or unidentified things in a main category. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:44, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

@Auntof6: Where would be the best place to start a discussion on this subject? At the Village Pump? - Takeaway (talk) 23:17, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
First, I'd decide what categories you want to include: uncategorized, unidentified, or both. If both, I'd use the Village pump. If only one, I'd use the highest-level category for that (maybe Category:Media needing categories by subject or Category:Unidentified subjects) but publicize it at the Village pump. --Auntof6 (talk) 01:06, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
@Takeaway, I have no problem to restore needed categories. But, I agree with the users here that more general questions should be discussed at VP. --Túrelio (talk) 08:02, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Thank you both. I will suggest keeping both categories as they are each very different (at least they are for me): "uncategorized" for those needing further categorization, and "unidentified" for those files that can not be identified from the available information, thus hoping for someone who just knows what it is. Regards, - Takeaway (talk) 09:18, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
@Tm:, please stop emptying out these "uncategorized" categories until after the discussion at VP which I will start soon. - Takeaway (talk) 09:25, 5 December 2018 (UTC)


Please restore as we now have a permission on this ticket. Ww2censor (talk) 23:47, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Ww2censor:, as I have no access to OTRS, what file are you refering to? --Túrelio (talk) 08:00, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
I'm sorry I assumed, without checking your rights, that you were an OTRS agent too. Here is the image link: File:Rendering Supernova Remnant Cassiopeia A into Virtual Reality.jpg Ww2censor (talk) 11:21, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:12, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Londa Toloraia.jpgEdit

I'm dealing with ticket#2018120310004845 regarding the file you've deleted recently. Can you restore it so that I can address if the ticket is valid? Thanks.--Mhhossein talk 11:52, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:12, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. --Mhhossein talk 16:56, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Please restoreEdit

We now have Ticket#2018120410009741 for File:CNHOLMBERG FD.jpg. Please restore so I can close this up and ping me when done. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 16:11, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

@Ww2censor:   Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:20, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, this is the same person but the wrong photo, so please delete again. Ww2censor (talk) 23:04, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:05, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Aldo BUSI.jpgEdit


Thank you, I did not see the OTRS tag...


--AntonierCH (d) 20:57, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Raju Bhavsar photoEdit

Hi why you have deleted the picture ...he is my uncle and I have to upload the picture as I am creating his Wikipedia ,I have the full right to add that Vishalttplayer (talk) 10:43, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

You had the answer already on your talkpage. You claimed this image to be your own work from October 2017. However, Maharash Times published it already in April 2017. --Túrelio (talk) 19:08, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Copyright objections: Bob JonesEdit

Hi, Turelio

I noticed you just flagged a couple of photos I uploaded on the page about Bob Jones. I can see you regarding the first photo. The photo of the book is one I took myself, but the photo in the photo is not and I understand how there could be some confusion.

Regarding the second photo, I don't think it's quite right to say that it's a book cover. Really, the photo is of a book. All books have covers and, unless it's going to be impermissible to upload photos of books at all, photos of books will necessarily show their covers. In my opinion, a photo of a book is materially different to an electronic file of the cover itself.

Please let me know what you think.


— Preceding unsigned comment added by MurdochNewman (talk • contribs) 23:22, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
It is indeed generally impermissible to upload photos of books at all, unless you own the license to the book itself (or the book is so old as for its license to have expired). It's the same as for any creative work. DMacks (talk) 05:47, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Clitocybula azurea Singer 577334.jpg & File:Cortinarius sphaerosporus Peck 962213.jpgEdit

Dear Turelio,

Please review these 2 images when you can. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:49, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

  • Thanks for your kind help Turelio. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:31, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Files from Brazilian ArmyEdit

Good morning, Túrelio! Please, wait some time before deleting the files that were uploaded by me and marked as copyright violation by Patrick Rogel. I'm talking with the site owner to prove that they are in public domain, acording to Licensing Creative Commons CC-Zero (This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. The person who associated a work with this deed has dedicated the work to the public domain by waiving all of his or her rights to the work worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law. You can copy, modify, distribute and perform the work, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.)

Thank you very much! Luiz265 (talk) 13:17, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

ok. --Túrelio (talk) 13:34, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

The site of the 2nd Field Artillery Group specified that the photos of its former commanders are in public domain, as you can see here, in the top of the page:

I would thank you, if you can remove the deletion tag of the files: File:SáFreire1.jpg; File:FranciscoAlbuquerque1.jpg; File:JoãoSoares1.jpg; File:EdisonPinto1.jpg; File:PauloAndrade1.jpg; File:GilbertoTeixeira1.jpg; File:LuizGonzaga1.jpg; File:GenMinati.jpg; File:GenBeraldo.jpg; File:CarlosVicente1.jpg; File:FernandoSantos1.jpg; File:Castilho1.jpg; File:CarlosSaú1.jpg; File:Freibergue1.jpg; File:BartholomeuFernandes1.jpg; File:MaturanaLopes1.jpg; File:ErbLeal1.jpg.

Best regards! Luiz265 (talk) 19:45, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

  Done. However, you need to add the true photo-date (at least the year) to the description, not the date of upload. --Túrelio (talk) 20:00, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your help. I'm putting the dates now! Luiz265 (talk) 20:02, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Wiki commons pictures .Edit

hi Turelio ,

I saw all my pictures were nog approved , these are in fact all my pictures and ik took them from my facebook page .

Some of them were made smaller so they fitted in better , I put several original pictures on my Wiki Common page . They were alle made by my mother and father and I have negatives and positives from the elder pictures .

Some of them were made with my smartphone , the pic with the English police officers was made with my smartphone . I think I'm not so special a professional woul'd take pictures of me . I took him from my FB and put him on my computer , like all the others .

I not only took my pictures with me on it because I'm narcisstic but also so I could prove they're mine and no money or rights can be involved . Because I was not that special as racer nor person .

Please reconsider , can you give me some advice ?

I contributed several pages and pieces on pages not with my account but some without logging in at first .

greetz Ivo

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ivo Van Damme (talk • contribs) 19:41, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi Ivo,
as I can reply in detail only tomorrow, I've changed the speedy-tag to a no-perm tag to give more time for "clean-up". --Túrelio (talk) 20:08, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Валентин Коновалов.jpgEdit

Hello! Sorry, my English isn't so good, but I'll try say. Yesterday you deleted this file. You say: "Copyright violation: !". But refer to the kirill fursov. Kirill fursov published the file on the Wikimedia Commons. He used Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0). In this connection, file can be restored. --Ремеш (talk) 11:54, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi, you are correct. Undeleted. --Túrelio (talk) 13:26, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Thank you! --Ремеш (talk) 21:20, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Deleted pictures for copyright violationEdit

Hi @Túrelio. I´ve seen that you have recently deleted this image. I think that there is a mistake because even though the image is present on google it was first published on wikimedia commons by the author Teresa Marenzi that has granted the permission for everyone to copy , reuse and modify it .If I am correct , Can you please restore the file ? Many thanks --Doratig --(talk) 15:20, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Doratig: as the account Teresa.marenzi (talk · contribs) had only 1 upload, how sure can we be that the true Teresa Marenzi is really behind it? Anyway, now I've emailed Mrs. Marenzi at her business address. --Túrelio (talk) 16:25, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Túrelio, That´s good . You are right we can never be sure . Let´s see what she says .Best --Doratig (talk) 16:37, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

You are lucky. She's replied already and I've restored. --Túrelio (talk) 17:27, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Túrelio. That´s great . Thanks for double checking . Best --Doratig (talk) 17:34, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Restore another oneEdit

We now have a ticket for File:EVP of Frontier Communications, Mark Nielsen.jpg, so please restore, then please ping me. Thanks in advance. Ww2censor (talk) 18:17, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

@Ww2censor:,   Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:19, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Category:Micro-Cap circuitsEdit

I made an error in my misunderstanding of what, appears to me, to be clever strategy on the part of @Andy Dingley: for ....

The one claim which cannot be a criticism, "eponymous", has been made into a criticism just by making it a claim. Yet, items are supposed to fit inside of categories which are eponymous with themselves! And now, by default, because I let it pass (through a clumsy misunderstanding on my part), the one category, Category:Micro-Cap circuits, which does belong to my items (without equivocation), no longer exists.

Please overlook my error and re-establish Category:Micro-Cap circuits.Vinyasi (talk) 05:03, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:37, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Thank you.Vinyasi (talk) 16:30, 13 December 2018 (UTC)


копиво с этого сайта (фото времён начала 20 века) Панн (talk) 07:05, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of my personal work for copyright violationEdit

Hello Túrelio,

I noticed that my file "File:المخطط_العمراني_لقصر_آيت_بن_حدو.jpg " has been deleted for copyright violation :

However, it is my own work ( the drawing is mine ).

Could you undelete it please.

Thank you,

Have a good day !

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nassima Chahboun (talk • contribs) 09:04, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi @Nassima:,
problem is that you used a professional map. I assume that the colored lines/arrows and the text is yours. You need to provide a source for the map and evidence that is under a free license or in the public domain. --Túrelio (talk) 11:10, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

2 imagesEdit

Dear Turelio,

Please review these images when you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:31, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:34, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank You for your kind help Turelio. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:37, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Request help with copyright of imageEdit

Hello there thanks for deleting that arguably non commons image.

The image when posted here is a little more clearly under commons, in my opinion. This is a "pro" flickr user, it was used by and they have not allowed derivatives, it has stood that way for a number of years. Do you agree and if not how do we go about getting the evidence? E.3 (talk) 20:38, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi E3, regrettably the Flickr user put it under Commons-noncompliante CC-ND license.
But apart from this practical problem, there is a general problem here: the right portion of the Flickr image is identical to the version en:File:The_Dress_(viral_phenomenon).png, which is under fair-use on :en and is credited to a "Cecilia Bleasdale", which suggest that she may be the original photographer. As long as we don't know know under what circumstances the Flickr image has been shot, we have to assume, it's just a copy of the original image and thereby likely copvvio. Of course, you may ask the Flickr user for an explaination. --Túrelio (talk) 21:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Two Mayors of Nizhny Novgorod Oleg Sorokin and Aleksandr Kondrashov congratulate citizens on The Day of the city (2011).jpgEdit

удали неверный редирект!!!! Панн (talk) 08:39, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

So, File:Two Mayors of Nizhny Novgorod Oleg Sorokin and Oleg Kondrashov congratulate citizens on The Day of the city (2011).jpg shall remain and File:Two Mayors of Nizhny Novgorod Oleg Sorokin and Aleksandr Kondrashov congratulate citizens on The Day of the city (2011).jpg shall go, right? --Túrelio (talk) 08:45, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Александр Кондрашов это ошибка Панн (talk) 09:49, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 11:14, 21 December 2018 (UTC)


Thank you for using it, but please ensure there is a timestamp.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 09:52, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

2 imagesEdit

Dear Turelio,

Please review these 2 images if you can. Commons does not have this species at all.

  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 11:14, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your kind help here Turelio. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:31, 21 December 2018 (UTC)


Hi Túrelio,

Could you please take time from your schedule and close the DR of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Postal Stamp on Dr. B.R. Ambedkar and the Constitution of India (2015).jpg as you have already deleted and redirected the duplicate image. :) Thanking you. --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 08:54, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:45, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

2 imagesEdit

Dear Turelio,

This is my final request for 2018. Please review these 2 images if you have the time.

Secondly, May I wish you and your family a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:31, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

  • Thanks for all your help Turelio. Have a Merry Christmas indeed. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:49, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2019! ;-)Edit

    * Happy Holidays 2019, Túrelio! *
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- George Chernilevsky talk 15:58, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

перенаправление и дублирующий файлEdit

удали пожалуйста это некорректное перенаправление!!! Панн (talk) 17:03, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

File:NGLU.jpg также вот этот файл, так как он дублирует существующий Панн (talk) 17:41, 23 December 2018 (UTC)


Guten Tag Túrelio,
ich wünsche Dir festliche Feiertage und für das Jahr 2019 alles erdenklich Gute.
Möge das neue Jahr uns allen ein friedliches Miteinander bringen, hier und überall.
Vielen Dank für Deine stets hilfreiche Unterstützung bei Fragen und Lösungen.
Beste Grüße. Orchi (talk) 17:47, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Re: Manisha Koirala image deletionEdit

Hi, you recently deleted an image uploaded by me (File:Manisha Koirala promoting Sanju.jpg), but it was covered by this OTRS ticket. Also used at File:Yuvan Shankar Raja exclusive HQ Photos Silverscreen.jpg, File:Thambi Ramaiah Exclusive Photos for Silverscreen.jpg and possibly others. Please look into it? DeluxeVegan (talk) 08:33, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi DeluxeVegan, but why wasn't there any hint to a permission? As I am not an OTRS volunteer, I can't look into the ticket. --Túrelio (talk) 08:39, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
I tried entering the number, but was stopped from submitting the edit since I wasn't having the required permission. What do you suggest be done next? Can the image possibly be restored? DeluxeVegan (talk) 08:49, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
You should try to contact the OTRS volunteer, who worked previously on the ticket with the other image, and ask him/her to drop me a note that the deleted image is also covered. --Túrelio (talk) 08:55, 24 December 2018 (UTC)


Moin! Du hattest bei File:Aachen, Brunnen -Fischpüddelchen- -- 2016 -- 2740.jpg das FoP-Template entfernt, da der Urheber des Brunnens bereits mehr als 70 Jahre verstorben ist. Das hat mich doch etwas rätseln lassen. Der Brunnen ist damit nicht mehr urheberrechtlich geschützt. Das stimmt. Aber FoP gilt meiner Meinung nach trotzdem noch. Aus meiner Sicht sind das zwei verschiedene paar Schuhe. Sicherlich hat FoP einen herausragenden Einfluss auf Objekte, deren Urheberin oder Urheber eben nicht unter die 70-Jahre-Regel fällt. Irgendwie verwirrt mich dieser juristische Kram immer wieder. Das FoP-Template habe ich erst einmal wieder hereingenommen, bin aber eher verwirrt, ob du nicht doch recht hast. Meiner Meinung nach ist es auf jeden Fall nicht falsch, vielleicht aber unnötig. --XRay talk 07:11, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi XRay,
der FoP-Baustein ist erforderlich, 1) um zu dokumentieren, dass das Foto überhaupt rechtmäßig aufgenommen bzw. hier hochgeladen wurde, und 2) informiert er Nachnutzer, dass bei der Nutzung einiges zu beachten ist, was wiederum von Land zu Land variieren kann. All dies zusätzlich zu den Lizenzbedingungen des Fotografen für das Foto an sich.
Mit dem Erlöschen des Urheberrechts am abgebildeten Kunstwerk fallen alle aus dem notwendigen Rückgriff auf FoP resultierenden Einschränkungen weg. Es gelten nur noch die Lizenzbedingungen des Fotografen. Deshalb ist der FoP-Baustein nach Erlöschen des Urheberrechts im Ursprungsland nicht mehr angebracht bzw. sogar irreführend, da er juristische Hürden aufbaut, die garnicht mehr bestehen. Intern kommt da noch hinzu, dass es nicht absolut ausgeschlossen ist, dass irgendwann einmal der FoP-Rückgriff für Fotos von Werken, die in den USA (Server-Standort) nicht unter FoP fallen (alle nicht-Gebäude), untersagt werden könnte. Dann wäre ein unnötiger FoP-Baustein ein Löschrisiko.
Ich werde jetzt keinen Editwar über den FoP-Baustein mit dir anfangen, hoffe aber, dich überzeugt zu haben. Andernfalls kannst du gerne eine Diskussion darüber auf dem Forum starten. --Túrelio (talk) 07:55, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Danke für die Info. Du hast ja sicherlich gemerkt, dass mir die Verwendung nicht ganz klar ist. Im Hinterkopf habe ich, dass mir die einzelne Korrektur nicht hilft. Wenn's irgendwie möglich ist, würde ich dann eher versuchen, den FoP-Baustein bei allen meinen Bildern zu entfernen, bei denen er unnötig erscheint. Ich denke oft weniger an das einzelne Bild, sondern mehr an alle meine hochgeladenen Bilder. Ich werde es mir mal durch den Kopf gehen lassen und ggf. eine passende Lösung schaffen. --XRay talk 08:56, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Ich wollte mich nur noch einmal kurz melden. Du hast meinen Gedankengang durchaus angeregt. Mittlerweile entsteht ein Algorithmus, der überflüssige FoP-Templates bei meinen Bildern wieder entfernt. Es fehlen noch ein paar Parameter, aber es geht schon ganz gut. Das wird zwar alles noch dauern, aber es stimmt, das Template muss nur dort stehen, wo auch etwas (noch) schutzwürdiges abgebildet ist. Vielen Dank noch einmal für deine Erläuterungen! Mir ist schon daran gelegen, dass so etwas stimmig ist. -- Und wenn ich schon schreibe: Ich wünsche dir einen guten Rutsch ins neue Jahr! --XRay talk 10:02, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Haus am Checkpoint Charlie 01.jpgEdit

No objection here, just trying to understand: why any need for {{FoP-Germany}} on File:Haus am Checkpoint Charlie 01.jpg? What is the "work" in question? The building? Or something else? - Jmabel ! talk 08:46, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi Jmabel, per its outer appearance I consider this building above above threshold of originality and thereby copyrightable. Architect Peter Eisenman is still alive. So, he might still claim copyright. As we have FoP exception in Germany, the FoP template is required 1) to document that taking & uploading this image was legitimate, and 2) to warn re-users that they have to check a bit more than just the photographer's license-terms. --Túrelio (talk) 08:51, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Concertina tesseract with blue faces.pngEdit

Could you undo the speedy deletion of this image? The request referred to a template, that I forgot to remove from this page. Watchduck (quack) 19:32, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:20, 28 December 2018 (UTC)


Hallo, Túrelio, you have just written that my image of Foulard Bianchi Logo has been marked as a possible copyright violation. But it is my image, i created, i put it on the foulard bianchi web site. How can i fix it? I dont mind if it belongs to me, i want to set it free to be downloaded and used, free of licence, how can i do? Please, help me...


— Preceding unsigned comment added by Alxms (talk • contribs) 07:54, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi Alxms,
it might help if you ask to send a confirmation from their official emil address to in which they should confirm that you are the creator/designer of that logo (not just the actual file) and that they agree with releasing it under the choosen free license.
My additional recommendation: in order to prevent others using this logo in a way that might be detrimental to Foulard Bianchi, they should register it as "trademark" or alike. --Túrelio (talk) 08:32, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind help Túrelio! Very kind. I have written them and crossed my fingers... --Alxms (talk) 09:17, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Two Mayors of Nizhny Novgorod Oleg Sorokin congratulate citizens on The Day of the city (2011) (cropped).jpgEdit

неверное перенаправление.Просьба удалить!!! Панн (talk) 19:35, 29 December 2018 (UTC)


Удалить файлEdit

BGMY он скопипащенный Панн (talk) 15:02, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Happy New 2019Edit

  Happy New 2019
Pan de jamón and Hallaca are a typical Christmas dish of my country, and I would like to share it with you, wishing you the best year 2019.. I would like to give you this humble recognition. Happy year 2019 dear!!! Photographer 01:44, 3 January 2019 (UTC)


Hallo Túrelio,
weißt Du, ob es hier eine Möglichkeit gibt, diese Bilder: vom 19. und 20. Dezember 2018 zu reparieren?
Dank für Deine Mühe und Grüße.
Orchi (talk) 18:49, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi Orchi,
"reparieren" kann man das m.E. nicht. Dieses Problem ist an sich altbekannt, kam früher aber sehr selten vor. Seit gefühlt 1-2 Jahren ist es jedoch sehr häufig geworden bei neuen Uploads. Es wurde m.W. auch schon auf Meta bzw. dem techn. Äquivalent thematisiert, anscheinend hat sich aber nichts geändert. Ich habe den Verdacht, dass die Ursache im Upload-Prozess zu suchen ist, denn dass plötzlich so viel mehr Kameras bzw. Smartphones defekt geworden sind, ist eher unwahrscheinlich. Letztlich bleibt derzeit nur der erneute Upload. Ich habe den Hochlader darum gebeten. --Túrelio (talk) 10:15, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
...vielen Dank für Deine erschöpfende Antwort. Beste Grüße. Orchi (talk) 14:49, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Added permission “Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0”Edit

“Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0”, photo uploaded on December 19, 2017. Your link Feb 24, 2018. --Korgolov (talk) 14:18, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi Korgolov, o.k. However, with this instagram date, the date for the image in the description is obviously wrong. Please enter the date, when the image had been shot. --Túrelio (talk) 14:35, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Corrected. I put a template on the page for verification. To the photo is not removed later. Thank. --Korgolov (talk) 14:42, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

1 imageEdit

Dear Turelio,

If you have some time, please help review this image below.

Commons does not have a single image of this species on its system....until this upload. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:25, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

  • Thank You for your help Turelio. I appreciate it. Best Wishes, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:39, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Borrado de imagenEdit

Buenas tardes. Recientemente he creado una página informativa de un artista y su imagen ha sido borrada por una supuesta violación de derechos de autor. AL respecto, quiero aclarar que la imagen es otorgada por el propio artista para ser insertada dentro de su página y por lo tanto no se incumple ninguna de las normas de las licencias creative commons. Le agradecería que la imagen siga apareciendo en la página y no se procediese a su eliminación

Muchas gracias, un saludo

— Preceding unsigned comment added by AgenciaG (talk • contribs) 08:17, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi AgenciaG,
the image in question was clearly labelled as "(C) SERGIO GONZALEZ". So, you need to provide a valid statement of permission to . --08:20, 9 January 2019 (UTC)Сергей_Бурунов.jpgEdit

скопипащенное фото, удали пожалуйста Панн (talk) 15:16, 9 January 2019 (UTC)Грицак_в_с.jpgEdit

тоже видно, что скопировано из интернета. Панн (talk) 15:25, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Notice of copyright violationEdit

Hello Turelio.

I just received notice that you have deleted File:George Crabtree in his office.jpg as a copyright violation. The reason given was: This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Photo: Mark Lopez

Both Mark Lopez and I are employees of Argonne National Laboratory who produces the images we want to use on the profile.

How do I appeal this?

Thank you,

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinhsb (talk • contribs) 16:46, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Justinhsb (talk) 17:21, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi Justinhsb,
the best would be if Mark Lopez personally sends an email to in which he mentions the filename and states that he is the photographer (if that is true) and that he agrees that you uploaded it under the choosen free license. If you intend to upload more image from the Argonne National Laboratory, you might consider to verify your user account on Commons, see Commons:Email templates/Account verification. --Túrelio (talk) 22:37, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
I'm working on this file File:George Crabtree in his office.jpg with an OTRS Ticket#2019010910007118 and it looks like this is actually a US government employee image. Please undelete so I can deal with it. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 23:47, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:35, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks, it is PD-USGov-DOE. Ww2censor (talk) 17:34, 10 January 2019 (UTC)


Hallo Túrelio,
"User:Nemo_bis" mit seinem bot "User:AnankeBot" lädt von Flickr viele Bilder hoch, die bereits in Commons sind.
Ich habe beide User.- Seiten mit der Bitte versehen, auf Duplikate zu achten.
Der Zeitaufwand, die Duplikate zu finden und zu kennzeichnen ist erheblich.
Kann man das unterbinden??
Grüße. Orchi (talk) 22:08, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi Orchi,
das war die letzten Monate immer wieder Thema, siehe z.B. Commons:Village_pump#How_to_prevent_mass_duplicate_uploads?. Ob man inzwischen eine brauchbare Lösung (1. das überhaupt zu verhindern, 2. für die automatische Erkennung post-factum) gefunden hat, entzieht sich meiner Kenntnis. --Túrelio (talk) 22:31, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Hallo Túrelio,
Danke für Deine Auskunft. User:Nemo will die Duplikate im nachhinein überarbeiten. Ich lege die Duplikate zunächst hier ab: Category:Duplicates by AnankeBot. Dann ist seine Arbeit sicherlich erleichtert. Beste Grüße. Orchi (talk) 15:04, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

2 imagesEdit

Dear Turelio,

Please review these images when you can. Thank You for your assistance.

Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:03, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

  Done I went I ahead and approved these uploads. De728631 (talk) 13:10, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
  •   Comment: Thank you for your kind help De728631 . Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:34, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Галина Коньшина 2016.jpgEdit

удали файл, так как он скопипащенный!!! С уважением, Панн (talk) 17:59, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Delete PhotoEdit

Dear Túrelio,

Can you delete the Anne Roumanoff's photo or change it please ?

It's will be nice for her branding.

Best regards,

Anne Roumanoff team.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by GUILLOT (talk • contribs) 10:36, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Which one Category:Anne Roumanoff? --Túrelio (talk) 08:49, 22 January 2019 (UTC)


Hallo! Du hast netterweise zwei Bilder aus Category:Tower Barracks (Dülmen) gelöscht. Aus deinem Kommentar lese ich, dass dies bei den verbliebenen dreien wegen der Verwendung nicht möglich ist. Sollte man da nicht die entsprechenden Diskussionsseiten und die Löschanträge wieder löschen/entfernen? Du hast da mehr Erfahrung. --XRay talk 09:43, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Du hast ne Mail. --Túrelio (talk) 14:44, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Löschung von Bilddatei Atsushi KagaEdit

Hallo Túrelio,

bin neu bei Wikipedia und habe versucht ein Bild zu einem Artikel hinzuzufügen. Es handelt sich um dieses hier: File:Kaga-Atsushi-pigozzi-collection-197.jpg Ich habe in den Einstellungen und Upload Richtlinien nichts gefunden wie ich vermerken kann, dass wir die schrift. Erlaubnis des Künstlers haben seinen von (uns verfassten) Wikipedia Artikel mit einem Bild von seinem Werk zu bestücken...? Ich möchte es jetzt nicht noch einmal Versuchen, da mit Sperrung des Accounts gedroht wurde...

Bitte um Hilfe und vielleicht Erklärung wie es hochzuladen ist und das in diesem Fall zu vermerken wäre, vielen Dank schon mal! Grüße, Nihongaku Nihongaku (talk) 14:07, 22 January 2019 (UTC)22.01.2019

Hallo Nihongaku,
das Problem mit diesem Bild ist, dass sich die Genehmigung auf "non-commercial use and educational purpose" beschränkte. Gemäß unseren Lizenz-Richtlinien COM:L dürfen auf Commons nur Bilder hochgeladen werden, die zur beliebigen Verwendung, einschließlich kommerzieller Nutzung, freigegeben sind. Dieses Prinzip ist natürlich oft ein Hindernis, aber leider nicht zu ändern. --Túrelio (talk) 14:47, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Löschung File:BWE EC 43 Berlin Lichterfelde Ost - Zuschnitt.jpg - Lizenzwechsel erfolgtEdit

Hallo Túrelio, du hast die Datei File:BWE EC 43 Berlin Lichterfelde Ost - Zuschnitt.jpg gelöscht mit der Begründung, dass die Lizenz auf Flickr keine Bearbeitung des Bildes zuließe. Wenn man sich die Flickr-Seite anschaut, scheint das auf den ersten Blick auch zu stimmen. Dennoch ist dem nicht so.
Ich achte beim Hochladen von Flickr-Bildern hierher immer genauestens auf die Lizenz und schaue lieber drei Mal drauf. Daher habe ich versucht zu recherchieren, und Bingo: Für die Orginialdatei File:BWE EC 43 Berlin Lichterfelde Ost.jpg hat der FlickreviewR 2-Bot die Lizenz cc-by-sa-2.0 damals bestätigt gehabt.
Somit hat also der Flickr-User TGr_79 im Nachhinein die Lizenz auf by-nd geändert. Wie wir jedoch wissen, kann die einmal gewährte CC-Lizenz gar nicht zurückgezogen werden. Da ich den Zuschnitt damals extra für eine Artikelbebilderung erstellt hatte, würde ich anregen, die Datei wiederherzustellen und mit der Vorlage Flickr-change-of-license zu versehen. Beste Grüße --Nordlicht8 (talk) 21:43, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Entlöscht. Danke für den Hinweis. --Túrelio (talk) 08:03, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Diskussion löschenEdit

Hallo! Bist du bitte so nett und löscht die beiden Diskussionsseiten: File talk:Dülmen, Tower Barracks -- 2014 -- 4290.jpg und File talk:Dülmen, Tower Barracks -- 2014 -- 4291.jpg. Zum Hintergrund und Verlauf hatte ich dir mehrere Mails geschickt. Die Info auf den Diskussionsseiten sollte besser weg. Bei der Prüfung musste ich feststellen, dass bei den meisten Quellen dort die Lizenzbedingungen nicht eingehalten wurden. Ich werde zwar nichts unternehmen, möchte aber auch niemanden mit diesen Beispielen verleiten. Danke! --XRay talk 11:54, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:58, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Lakshya Serial.jpgEdit

Hi Túrelio. You deleted this file (at least one with the same name) back on December 13, 2018, but it's been reuploaded by another editor (my guess is that it's same editor using a new account). It still has the same issue as before and I think OTRS should verify authorship. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:23, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

File already deleted by my colleague Racconish. --Túrelio (talk) 13:26, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:09, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Mother Teresa PhotoEdit

Thanks for allowing the use of the Mother Teresa photo! We're going to use it in an educational kids show. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 07:22, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 11:49, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

1 imageEdit

Dear Turelio,

Please review this single image if you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:17, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Sure,   Done. Was very busy (RL) for the first weeks of the new year. --Túrelio (talk) 11:49, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Thank You Turelio. I understand we all have to work in the 'real world'. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:29, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Removing my image on Dundee railway stationEdit

Hi there,

I just wanted to let you know that the image you deleted on Dundee railway station infobox was actually a photo I had taken and it wasnt copyrighted material.

I am from Dundee and I often take pictures of the waterfront including the new railway station. I do not understand why you deleted it when it was clearly my own work.

~ KeyKing666 KeyKing666 (talk) 16:35, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

I assume that you are talking about File:DundeeRail20180711.png. It had been deleted because the nominator claimed it to be a copy of this image. However, the images are totally different, which I did recognize only now. I've restored the image. Sorry for the hassle. --Túrelio (talk) 19:29, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

image deletedEdit

Dear Turelio, Please kindly restore my image submission (you deleted this morning). The site authorised me to use their logo on wikipedia. Thank You,

Pol Fyodor (talk) 12:23, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Pol Fyodor:, you need to forward the said permission to . --Túrelio (talk) 20:07, 2 February 2019 (UTC)


Dear Turelio,

I saw you deleted my image at I was talking to Patrick_Rogel about it here and was saying that other logos were accepted according to the pre 1987 rule. This one is indeed post 1987 but only the number 70 is added. I believe this add on doesn't make it a new logo as the main is still the WFUNA one. Please advise. thank you! --APG1984 (talk) 15:59, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

any advice is welcome:). thx!!--APG1984 (talk) 12:07, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Sorry for my late response. I've now undeleted the file. If there are again objections, the file should go into a regular deletion-request, which allows input from other users. --Túrelio (talk) 13:01, 19 February 2019 (UTC)


Hey i am sorry wast your time about this picture/:SaQi organize a french festival.jpg you were rght i will remember your advice

best regard

— Preceding unsigned comment added by CLAIREYUAN2010 (talk • contribs) 19:44, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

--CLAIREYUAN2010 (talk) 20:49, 29 January 2019 (UTC)



Could you undelete the file: File:MilckeMikolaj.jpg. An author of the picture sent proper agreement ticket:2019012810022281]. Cheers, Polimerek (talk) 20:54, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Polimerek:, I've restored the file. --Túrelio (talk) 20:06, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

deletion of image JDD Still1 Bathtub.jpgEdit

Hello Turelio,

I am writing about the original image from the page Joan Does Dynasty. I am the artist who created this work and the image is mine by copyright. Please advise how I can upload this image again without the risk of deletion.

Thank you very much,


— Preceding unsigned comment added by Juanitavid (talk • contribs) 20:37, 1 February 2019 (UTC)


You speedydeleted File:Gerrymandering_-_représentation_visuelle.svg, but a normal deletionrequest would be better, expecially since I don't know any better version. If you undelete the file mentioned above please overwrite it with File:Gerrymandering_reprsentation_visuellepscov0_cs3ss_nsss_s_ppscov0_csbvpss.svg otherwise please also speedydeletete the other file.  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 19:56, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi @JoKalliauer:, I've restored the file. --Túrelio (talk) 20:04, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Alchemilla xanthochlora herbarium (02).jpgEdit

Dear Admin Turelio,

The uploader of this deleted NC image complained to me that the source license was free. But you and I saw the license and it was NC. Rasbak just made 1 mistake, I'm sure. Can you just copy and type in the original source link below here? Pity I did not file a regular Dr as in this case Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:14, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi Leoboudv,
I was out of country for a week. Here ist the source-entry for the deleted file: . --Túrelio (talk) 08:59, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Dr Otto von Bauer, Deutschbalte, Geschäftsführer Fabergé.jpgEdit

Hello Túrelio, since the DR about,_Deutschbalte,_Geschäftsführer_Fabergé.jpg is finished, I'd request a closing of the deletion notice. Thank you, Lars barnewitz (talk) 11:45, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Hallo @Lars barnewitz:,
in der Löschdiskussion hast du geschrieben, dass deine Urgroßmutter Veronika Bauer das Foto aufgenommen hat. Dann solltest du im Feld "Urheber" deinen durch ihren Namen ersetzen. Weisst du, in welchem Jahr sie verstorben ist? Das ist wichtig für die korrekte Wahl der Lizenz. --Túrelio (talk) 09:06, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Hallo @Túrelio:,
Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, das Feld "Urheber" habe ich dann bearbeitet. Veronika Bauer ist im Jahr 2000 verstorben. Das Jahr der Aufnahme selbst ist unbekannt, doch um 1920 herum geschätzt. Welche Lizenz sollte ich nun verwenden? --Lars barnewitz (talk) 10:20, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Sergio Sarra works deletedEdit

Dear Túrelio,

you marked all the pictures I uploaded of Sergio Sarra's works because of copyright violation. Anyway, I think there is a misunderstanding.

I mentioned as the source of the images the website of Archivio Studio Sarra where there are some of these photos. The website is copyrighted, but the "Archivio Studio Sarra" give me a slightly different copy of each image intended for free Creative Commons use by the owner himself. So the real source of the image is simply "Archivio Studio Sarra".

The images intended for free Creative Commons use by the owner himself are:

  • Sergio Sarra.jpg
  • File:Earvin 'Magic' Johnson, Sergio Sarra, Darnell Valentine.jpg
  • File:Sergio Sarra, two Ipnlogic 5, 2013.jpg
  • File:Sergio Sarra, Relationship, 2006.jpg
  • File:Sergio Sarra Table sculpture.jpg
  • File:Umberto Curi, La forza dello sguardo.jpg
  • File:Sergio Sarra, iceberg 7 - study no.2, 2017.jpg
  • File:1 - Aperto '93, Venice Biennale, installation view.jpg
  • File:Sergio Sarra, Psichedelyc garden 1 - Psichedelyc garden 3, 2008.jpg
  • File:Sergio Sarra, Involuntary commitment, 2010.jpg
  • File:Sergio Sarra, Pettino, planimetria di Contrada Selva, 2011.jpg
  • File:Sergio Sarra in studio.jpg
  • File:Paesaggio, 1993, pittura ad olio su tela, 40 x 53 cm. Aperto '93, XLV Esposizione Internazionale d’Arte di Venezia, La Biennale di Venezia, Corderie dell’Arsenale, 1993. Foto
  • File:Sergio Sarra - Caparsino.jpg
  • File:Sergio Sarra - LSD.jpg
  • File:Sergio Sarra - Elisabetta.jpg
  • File:Sergio Sarra - due Ipnologic.jpg
  • File:Sergio Sarra - Italian garden and fountain.jpg
  • File:Sergio Sarra - Italian garden with child.jpg
  • File:Sergio Sarra - Players in the Mediterranean.jpg
  • File:Sergio Sarra - D. dal vero n. 2.jpg
  • File:Sergio Sarra - Psychedelic garden.jpg
  • File:Sergio Sarra - EWHA Womans University.jpg
  • File:Sergio Sarra - Vetta del Monte.jpg

I would like to understand how to correct the source of images (from to Archivio Studio Sarra) and remove the copyright violation tagging for all the pictures mentioned above. Obviously, I can prove that the images I uploaded are the copies intended for free Creative Commons use by the owner himself, the "Archivio Studio Sarra".

Kind regards, Synenvi (talk) 11:57, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Synenvi:,
in such cases, the uploader (you) needs to provide written evidence for the claimed free license. In your case it seems to be complicated by the fact that
1) a number of the image files were obviously (per its EXIF data) shot by different photographers, such as MARIO DI PAOLO, Ito Lim, Gino Di Paolo, Elisabetta Sarra, Attilio Di Daniele, etc.
2) in some of your uploads the author-name in the description (by you) is not identical to the one in the camera data. For example in File:Sergio Sarra - due Ipnologic.jpg it's "Franco Sarra" versus "Attilio Di Daniele".
3) a number of your uploads are photographies of works of art, such as drawings/paintings, which have a copyright by their own, usually hold by the artist/painter.
So, first you should ask the Archivio Studio Sarra whether they really have the full copyright/permission from all involved artists and photographers to release these images under a free license, which allows also commercial re-use (see COM:L). (Remember, mere ownership of a print or even of the original work of art does not equal having the copyright. Only the autor/artist can give his/her copyright away.) If that is the case, then you need to correct/complete the description of each of your uploads by clearly writing who is the (mere) photographer and who is the artist/painter/etc.
A template for a permission in Italian, you find here: Commons:Modello_richiesta_di_permesso#Pubblicazione_con_licenza_libera.
--Túrelio (talk) 09:24, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi @Túrelio: and thank you for your reply,
today I spoke directly with the artist Sergio Sarra and his wife Elisabetta Sarra (they are Archivio Studio Sarra).
To avoid future problems with photographers and reports as yours, we decided by mutual agreement to remove all the photos except for File:Sergio Sarra.jpg. The photo was taken from Elisabetta Sarra and represents the artist Sergio Sarra walking. The photographer Elisabetta Sarra (and the artist Sergio Sarra) agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International.
Elisabetta Sarra will send, via the 'official' e-mail address, the permission in the formula that you kindly linked to me and I upload the description and others info for the file File:Sergio Sarra.jpg.
Is this process enough to remove the tagging for the file above-mentioned or it needs something else? Also, can you tell me how can I proceed to delete all the other photos instantly?
Thank you, Synenvi (talk) 18:01, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Photo in SVGEdit

"11:33, 25 January 2019 Túrelio (talk | contribs) deleted page File:TonyBellew.png (Exact or scaled-down duplicate: File:TonyBellew.svg) (thank) (global usage; delinker log)"

No photo should ever be in SVG format.. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:58, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

sure. However, in this case the uploader himself (Mentoss281) had requested the speedy-deletion of File:TonyBellew.png. As it's already some weeks ago, I don't exactly remember my rationale for choosing the duplicate-process; may be that the png still had uses. Its similar with the File:TonyBellew.svg, which I had deleted before the png, as it had been requested for speedy-deletion by the uploader himself due to "Некорректно отображается". --Túrelio (talk) 08:58, 12 February 2019 (UTC)


Hallo! Bist du wohl so nett und löscht diese Diskussionsseite wieder: File talk:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Mini -- 2016 -- 5129-35.jpg. Ich hatte lange überlegt, ob ich das Bild als PoD eintragen soll oder nicht. Da ich etliche andere mit Beschriftung fand, habe ich es dann mit denen, auf denen der BMW Mini zu sehen ist, auch getan. Und prompt kam ein Kommentar, der aber nicht wirklich zielführend ist - was auch immer damit bezweckt werden soll. Er klärt nicht auf und eigentlich stört er nur. Danke! --XRay talk 11:52, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 11:19, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Danke! --XRay talk 11:21, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Wapt.jpgEdit

Hi Túrelio,

you have recently deleted the image File:Wapt.jpg because of copyright violation (Copyright violation: Simon Fonteneau (wikipedia username Skarpiste) is the author of the image and is the one that has done the upload. Is it ok for you if we re-upload the schema with better explanation of copyright source? Moreover, if Simon can re-upload, he would like to change the name something more specific, since WAPT is also an american TV station (something like "WAPT deployment software - workflow schema.jpg").


Cardondenis (talk) 09:47, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi Cardondenis,
it might be better, if you ask Simon Fonteneau to send a confirmation of his authorship (and eventual relation to to (content of email is treated confidentially, will not be published). When he has sent it, you can drop me a notice, so that I can temporarily un-delete File:Wapt.jpg. While the permission is processed by our OTRS volunteers, the file can be renamed and the description be adapted. --Túrelio (talk) 11:18, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Will it be deleted?Edit

Hello. My two drawings File:Dibujo de John Rawls.jpg and File:Gustavo Bueno Alvaro Marques.jpg recently have been marked as derivative works, which they are, I admit, but, will they be deleted for copyright? There are some art works derivated on wikipedia as well, like Derrida Dibujo.jpg , Derrida-by-Pablo-Secca.jpg and Foucalt.png. But, even still, I hope they wont be erased. Thank you. --Alvaro Marques Hijazo (talk) 01:39, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

I will remove the no-source tag, but put them into a regular deletion-request, which allows a discussion and input from other users. It's not my intent to have them deleted, but to be sure they are legal. --Túrelio (talk) 07:35, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Uploading a file for a third partyEdit

I have a friend of mine, who's not a computer jedi and who's happy to share his old pictures with WP. But he doesn't want to create an account and start to learn (he's +70) of to use WP.
Is there any possibility (by filling a form for instance) to prove his agreement with the licence?
Thanks for your answer. Davric (talk) 11:24, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Davric:, sure. He could authorize you to upload his photos, provided they are his own work. The easiest way would be if he would give you all the images, he wants to be uploaded, in one batch. Immediately after uploading them, you should prepare a statement of permission, using this template: Commons:Email_templates#Email_message_template_for_release_of_rights_to_a_file, in which you need to list the file-names of all these uploads and then either send it per email to him or, if he does not have email, you would need to print it out and send him the print. He then needs to date and sign the permission document and either send it per email directly to or send the print to you, you need to scan and send it to address mentioned above. --Túrelio (talk) 08:47, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Restore Udo_Dahmen_Foto_Arthur_Bauer.jpgEdit

Hi Túrelio, you have deleted the File:Udo_Dahmen_Foto_Arthur_Bauer.jpg on Commons. Permission and license has been submitted by Arthur Bauer to "" Please help restore the photo. Thanks. MKBam (talk) 13:26, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

I can restore it conditionally. However, it may be deleted again as there is a huge back-log with OTRS permissions. --Túrelio (talk) 13:39, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks, Túrelio! MKBam (talk) 14:48, 18 February 2019 (UTC)


Hi. There are more empty cats to delete. Danke. --E4024 (talk) 14:39, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 14:43, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

File recover (File:COAF SMART Center Hayk Babayan.jpg)Edit

Dear Participants, please recover file named COAF SMART Center Hayk Babayan.jpg as there was an OTRS letter sent on February 13, 2019. You have deleted the file. Could you please recover it based on the letter?

Thank you in advance.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by AnukEvo (talk • contribs) 07:51, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
I have no access to OTRS. First, an OTRS volunteers needs to give feedback to the mentioned letter or drop me a note. --Túrelio (talk) 08:16, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

File: N.Ermekbayev.jpgEdit

Добрый день Turelio. Вы удалили изображение N.Ermekbayev.jpg. Указанное изображение является общедоступным без ограничееий авторскиx прав. Прошу восстановить. Спасибо за понимание. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 17:30, 24 February 2019 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk) 17:32, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi Unknown, the problem is that the source-website[11] says: "2009 – 2019 © Министерство обороны Республики Казахстан Все права защищены", which translates to "... All rights reserved". If you insist, I can undelete it and put it into a regular deletion-request.--Túrelio (talk) 10:19, 25 February 2019 (UTC)


Good day! This File:Zv 3 sl.jpg=[12]? This file is probably taken from this site as well as other's downloaded by that user. Under no permission to these files, as this 3D objects and bad metadata. Is it better to nominate for delete? What do you think? --Чорний Кіт (talk) 08:44, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi AlexKozur,
I am not sure, as the article on seems to be from 2018, whereas our upload is from 2017. Anyway, feel free to nominate it for regular deletion, which might attract more inpit from others. --Túrelio (talk) 10:15, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

File recover File:Brief Bevelhebber Nederlandse Strijdkrachten.jpgEdit

Dear Túrelio,

See here; can you recover this file because it is written in a public function and therefore not depending on the '70 year ago'-death of the author?

Thanks in advance, Encycloon (talk) 09:35, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Ok. However, IMO you should add this information to the author name in the description of the image. --Túrelio (talk) 10:10, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Category:Viquimarató Dones del teixit comercial i empresarialEdit

Please, can you revert the deletion of Category:Viquimarató Dones del teixit comercial i empresarial? I will upload the images today. --Davidpar 13:17, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

  Done, but the cat is still empty. --Túrelio (talk) 19:56, 12 March 2019 (UTC)


Why did you delete the category? It was neither acccidental, test, or any other sppedy criterion. It contained 69 files, that have been moved to wooferendum march 2019. That move makes sense, if the user wanted to add the sub-category for the october 2018 wooferendum, or the sub-cat for a future wooferendum. As far as I know there exists no content from the october wooferendum, and I don't expect that there will be another wooferendum, a as brexit is abput to happen in march 2019. It still might habe been possible to redirect wooferendum to wooferendum march 2019, but it is not ok to delete the cat as nonsense. --C.Suthorn (talk) 17:02, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

The cat had been tagged as SDG1 by User:B dash and this rationale is automatically taken over into the deletion-log, if there was no manual change by the deleting admin. In addition, when I deleted it, the cat was surely empty, which is in itself a valid deletion-rationale. However, as this is not a question of faith for me, I've now undeleted it. --Túrelio (talk) 19:56, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Bitte um ÜberprüfungEdit

Hallo Túrelio,
Könntest Du bitte diese zwei Bilder auf korrektes Hochladen überprüfen:

Die Bilder sind wohl identisch mit diesen Bildern:

Beste Grüße und Dank für Deine Mühe. Orchi (talk) 16:27, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Wenn ich die Angaben auf richtig deute, sind die beiden Uploads wohl als copyvios einzustufen, falls User:Dracaenaworldwide nicht mit diesem T. Damen identisch ist. --Túrelio (talk) 16:52, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
...reicht die Aussage auf der Benutzerseite von Dracaenaworldwide? Orchi (talk) 17:29, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Orchi, hmm, eigentlich nicht so ganz, zumal hotmail-Adressen hier kein so hohes Ansehen haben. Vielleicht stehe ich auf dem Schlauch, aber ich bringe und "T. Damen" nicht unter einen Hut. Ah, jetzt habe ich die Antwort von Dracaenaworldwide auf seiner Disku gesehen. Offenbar hatte ich dich von vornherein mißverstanden. Anyway, ich habe ihm empfohlen, eine Mail an OTRS zu schicken, um solche Probleme in Zukunft zu vermeiden.--Túrelio (talk) 20:20, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
...danke für Deinen Einsatz zur Lösung meiner Frage. Der User hat begonnen, bei Wikispecies konstruktiv einzusteigen. Grüße. Orchi (talk) 12:28, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Picture removal due to copyright violationEdit

Hello there. I've noticed that a picture uploaded: file:Lineage 16.0 Screenshot.png on was deleted by you due to copyright violation. I'm quite confused since the picture was taken on my own phone and did not expect your deletion. I case that I need to prove it's my own work, how can I? I am looking forward to hear clarification from you.


— Preceding unsigned comment added by Linein3 (talk • contribs) 13:46, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Linein3,
as already hinted at your talkpage the file File:Lineage 16.0 Screenshot.png has been deleted from Commons due to suspicion of being a copyvio. Though we do not doubt that you performed the screenshot by yourself, creating a screenshot does not automatically give you the copyright of what you made a reproduction of. The deleted image showed a typical smartphone screen-page, which is usually copyrighted. Though en:LineageOS is open-source, this is not necessarily valid for such "design" material, as it usually is not produced by the OS programers, but taken from other sources. So, you need to provide evidence that this screen-page/background image also falls under an open-source license. --Túrelio (talk) 13:59, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

deletion of Rise of bros / Michael jacksonEdit

Dear sir wondering if you remove this page I uploaded it by mistake

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Morganstanley1970 (talk • contribs) 14:40, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
File:Bros 1988 article Michael Jackson.jpg now deleted. --Túrelio (talk) 22:43, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Deleting of image: Dietiminsta.jpgEdit


You've deleted an image called: Dietiminsta.jpg

This image has been deleted Without any evidence and has beennrightfully uploaded by the owner of the photo. The image is available on Instagram @dietim_ and is his own property.

Usage of the image has been requested by Tim van Teunenbroek @Dietim_ and hereby requested the undeleting of earlier mentioned image.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Luxurylifenl (talk • contribs)
Hi Luxurylifenl,
the claimed source[15] does not show any evidence of a free license. Merely publishing an image on a website does not mean that is is under a free license, as required for all uploads to Commons. In addition, there is no verifiable evidence that you, Luxurylifenl, are identical to the owner of the mentioned Instagram account.
So, even if you are, you need to send a statement from the said Instagram account address to in which you need to state 1) that you are either the original photographer of the uploaded image (or that you have obtained the full copyright from the photographer), 2) that you want to release the image under a free licence (see Commons:Licensing), which allows anybody to use this image, even commercially, provided the license terms are met. --Túrelio (talk) 14:20, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Túrelio".