Busy desk.svg This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

العربية | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | magyar | հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | Simple English | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ATTENTION: Please use my talk page rather than emailing me.


noframe

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic.


Deutsch | English | français | magyar | македонски | +/−

Please keep discussions together:

  • If I was starting a thread on your talk page, please answer there. I will watch your talk page.
  • If you started a discussion here on my talk page, I will answer here.

All requests for and notifications of re-use of my images on Commons have been moved to Requests & Notifications.

If you can't find a comment or an older discussion here, take a look whether it is in one of my archives:
Archive1 (latest), Archive2 (2007), Archive3 (2008), Archive4 (2009), Archive5 (2010), Archive6 (2011), Archive7 (2012), Archive8 (2013), Archive9 (2014), Archive10 (2015), Archive11 (2016), Archive12 (2017), Archive13 (2018), Archive14 (2019).


FotoEdit

Visto le numerose foto rimosse, non metterò più foto che trovo su facebook (che sono foto libere di essere prese perchè ho sempre chiesto il permesso all'autore). Alberto. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alberto Davide Lorenzi (talk • contribs)

Copyright ViolationEdit

I am writing for the uploads I made. In addition I saw you deleted my user page.

First Issue:

[File:Gizem Sözeri.jpg] File:Gizem_Sözeri.jpg

[File:Batuhan Civelek.jpg] File:Batuhan_Civelek.jpg

I could not find any time to write about these photographs. Now I have and I am writing to you but they were deleted already. I uploaded them yesterday, and the violation was the copyright. However you added the link from the web, one of the links were from the website I created and I edit. The website is http://www.agso.com.tr/

Also the Twitter Account that I am also in charge of. I can send you, if necessary, associated screenshots that shows I am in control of the website and the Twitter account.

For both photographs, you can find them in the musician profile pages in our website:

http://www.agso.com.tr/gizem-sozeri/

http://www.agso.com.tr/batuhan-civelek/

I created the profile pages for our musicians and I also have all possible permissions to use them. They deleted because the claim was I violated the copyrights of the photographs. I want to add the social media link that we use to inform our audience about our soloists:

For Gizem Sözeri: https://www.instagram.com/p/Bw1zoi2hj-u/

https://www.facebook.com/AnkaraGenclikSenfoniOrkestrasiResmiSayfasi/photos/a.336660193394368/775258289534554/

For Batuhan Civelek: https://www.instagram.com/p/BqfovEihW8k/

https://www.facebook.com/AnkaraGenclikSenfoniOrkestrasiResmiSayfasi/photos/a.336660193394368/687146135012437/

I can also send you a screenshot that I have the control of the website https://www.agso.com.tr/


- Second Issue:

For the photographs, that

File:Ömer Berk Taraklı.jpg

File:Batuhan Civelek.jpg

There is a issue and these issues effect my other uploads. They are:

File:Ömer Berk Taraklı Weber AGSO Artwork.jpg

File:Batuhan Civelek Lebrun Oboe Concerto AGSO Artwork.jpg

It says that they contain image within image. It is true but they are the album artwork of I release and the image within image is my original content. I want to add our albums’ Spotify links.

For Ömer Berk Taraklı: https://open.spotify.com/album/3Z9UizpwSYjFmp8sdaJxrF?si=PZTvt-Z2RKSCUAMx3V_7lw

For Batuhan Civelek: https://open.spotify.com/album/5FzbrVFPenCrOH4IKRC8G3?si=HkeqW0nIRjaiUnxHc0iSiw


- Third Issue:

Lastly, I have another issue about another recording’s artwork. This time there is no soloist, and I am the conductor. However I do not want to take the credit, I want to give the credit to my orchestra. That’s why I did not use my photograph in the artwork. (I give the credit to the soloists If there is any. For example, File:Ömer Berk Taraklı Weber AGSO Artwork.jpg , File:Batuhan Civelek Lebrun Oboe Concerto AGSO Artwork.jpg ). I added the photograph of the orchestra. I have every possible right to use it because it is the product of my team. I also use the photograph in our website. The link is: https://www.agso.com.tr/hakkimizda/ you can see this photograph in the background of the first visual you in the page.

The artwork I am talking about is this: File:Barış Demirezer Beethoven AGSO Artwork.jpg


This is the Spotify link of our album:

https://open.spotify.com/album/1VZnxx3t3RQeXut9E735iL?si=PO2waSIkSwSKrv6_YU1zgQ


I am really thankful for your efforts. I am really aware of the community rules and I deeply respect them. I can image how many situations you face that violate the community rules. I also deeply respect you for your volunteer efforts for making this community dependable.

Sincerely,

Barış Demirezer (talk) 14:58, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi Barış Demirezer,
these are a lot of questions. I don't have enough time today for that. So, you will need a bit of patience.
Regarding File:Barış Demirezer Beethoven AGSO Artwork.jpg: here are possibly 2 copyrights to consider: 1) the photographer of the orchestra-shot and 2) the designer of the cover-composition. You should provide a permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS) which includes boths aspects. If you designed the cover as such, you only need to obtain the photographers permission. If the cover-rights are with the record company, you need their permission. The permission should ideally come directly from the photographer and should mention the filename on Commons. --Túrelio (talk)
Dear Túrelio,
Thank you for your time. If any other thing is necessary please inform me. I can immediately supply what you need. Thank you again for your time and effort!
Barış Demirezer (talk) 18:05, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Dear Túrelio,
I sent an e-mail for all of the documents I uploaded and OTRS made necessary changes. The situation is the same with the photos deleted. Is it possible to undelete the photos and allow me to give necessary permissions? File:Gizem Sözeri.jpg and File:Batuhan Civelek.jpg are the photographs I am talking about and ask you to undelete them. I do not want to re-upload them before learning your approach to this situations. I do not want to act without your consent. In addition you deleted my user profile. Is it possible to undo it? Thank you for your time
Barış Demirezer (talk) 08:16, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

a strange deletion requestEdit

Hi again. I have gotten a rather strange deletion request for a file that I meticulously researched to ensure it met PD-Russia-1996 rules (I found a 1945 publication of it with no author attribution, and an archivist selling it at an auction gave no indication of who the author was, and author remains unknown). The initial deletion template was rather vague, saying "It looks like an mistaken license.". I thought I was being trolled at first since I was not mistaken with the licence and provided publication information, but apparently it's an experienced user. As requested I provided a link to the publication directly, which I did, but then he went on about how the person at the auction might secretly know the name of the author, (even though the back of the photo card had just a number on it, no photographer name at all) etc. What do you make of this? I've gotten a few similar nominations like this in the past that have turned out to be "keep". I have to say I am a bit annoyed by all the unusual "what-ifs" and goalpost-moving. I mean, if the auctioneer knows/knew the photographer name but kept it secret from the public, one would think it would be considered anonymous still? After all, if a samizdat work was written by a few authors who knew each other but kept their identities secret, it is considered anonymous since the public doesn't know.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:18, 3 November 2019 (UTC)


Merry ChristmasEdit

  Merry Christmas Túrelio

Hi Túrelio, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas
and a very happy and prosperous New Year,
Thanks for all your contributions to the 'pedia this past year,
   –Davey2010talk 18:45, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2020!Edit

    * Happy Holidays 2020, Túrelio! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:42, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

 

recent relation of faulty shower imageEdit

Hi I was wondering why the image was deleted as this image is a free image and was taken myself and has no copyright .kind regards Craig noble — Preceding unsigned comment added by "craignoble666" (talk • contribs) 16:50, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

GrüßeEdit

Hallo @Túrelio:,
Für die kommenden Weihnachtstage wünsche ich Dir alles Gute.
Möge uns das neue Jahr 2020 hier und überall ein friedliches Miteinander und eine erfolgreiche Zeit bringen.
Ganz herzlich möchte ich mich bei Dir für Deine stete Hilfe bedanken, wenn ich hier nicht mehr weiter weiß oder meine Nerven etwas blank liegen.
Danke und beste Grüße. Orchi (talk) 20:55, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Schnelllöschung aller Dateien von User:Klagenfurter DancerEdit

Du hast heute alle Dateien von User:Klagenfurter Dancer schnellgelöscht. Das war aber definitiv kein Fall für eine Schnelllöschung, wie hier begründet wurde. Es ist die offizielle Flickr-Seite von de:Die Grünen Kärnten. Der Fotograf war in der Partei involviert und hat auch eine eigene Flickr-Seite (auf der er die Bilder allerdings nicht hochgeladen hat. Die Flickr-Seite der Grünen Kärnten lädt manche Bilder mit "Alle Rechte vorbehalten" hoch. Für diese Bilder gelten die in der Löschbegründung genannten Vorgaben sicherlich. Die gelöschten Bilder wurden aber ausnahmslos mit CC-Lizenzen hochgeladen. Man kann davon ausgehen, dass der Landesverband einer professionellen politischen Partei das nicht versehentlich so macht. Es gibt bei Wikimedia Commons bereits zahlreiche Bilder von derselben Flickr-Seite der Grünen aus Kärnten mit CC-Lizenz, die nach Jahren bis heute nie beanstandet wurden. --2003:C3:4F46:F944:1CD5:51B6:576A:79B9 12:35, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Hallo IP,
dass etwas bisher nicht aufgefallen ist, gilt schon auf der Wikipedia nicht als Entschuldigung. In letzter Zeit sind halt öfter gleichartige Probleme mit Flickrkonten von Institutionen aufgefallen. Diejenigen, die hier schon etwas länger aktiv sind, wissen aus Erfahrung, dass man Lizenzen auch von Institutionen, die ja oft nicht selbst der Urheber sind, immer mit einer Prise Salz nehmen muss. Wenn der Flickrkonto-Inhaber als behaupteter Bildrechteinhaber die von WvB angesprochenen Widersprüche zufriedenstellend aufklärt, können die gelöschten Bilder problemlos wiederhergestellt werden. --Túrelio (talk) 14:30, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Hallo Turelio, ich habe diese Fotos ebenfalls beobachtet und keine so eindeutige URV gesehen, da diese Fotos bei Flickr mit CC und eben der anderen Lizenz doppelt lizenziert wurde. Auch ich habe früher schon Fotos von denen hochgeladen, die sehrwohl mit wechselnder Lizenz hochladen also schon wissen worum es geht. Deshalb verstehe ich die Schnellöschung ebenfalls nicht wirklich. -- gruß K@rl (talk) 16:33, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
@K@rl, wie ich oben schon schrieb ist in letzter Zeit das eine oder andere institutionelle Flickr-Konto durch gewisse Ungereimtheiten der Lizenzierung aufgefallen. Ich habe kein Problem damit, die Bilder temporär zu entlöschen, müsste sie dann aber sofort in einen LA stecken, denn die Angelegenheit muss doch ordentlich (d.h. Erklärung des Lizenzgebers gegenüber OTRS) geklärt werden. --Túrelio (talk) 18:01, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Zudem lässt sich mit Web-Archiv feststellen, dass es diesen Infotext im Januar 2017 noch gar nicht gab Somit stellt sich also die Frage: Kann ein Flickr-Accountinhaber durch die Erstellung eines Infoseiten-Textes nach der Veröffentlichung mit CC-Lizenz diese CC-Lizenz zurücknehmen? Ich würde sagen: Nein. Und alle hochgeladenen CC-Bilder stammen aus Zeiträumen zwischen 2013 und 2014. --2003:C3:4F46:F944:1CD5:51B6:576A:79B9 17:30, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
@IP, das spielt keine Rolle, denn zum Zeitpunkt des Kopierens nach Commons war der Hinweis offensichtlich vorhanden. Es geht darum, die Nachnutzer der auf Commons gehosteten Medien vor URV/Schadenersatzforderungen zu schützen. Übrigens: Falls du User:Klagenfurter Dancer bist, warum logst du dich nicht ein? --Túrelio (talk) 18:01, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
auch das ist nicht bewiesen, denn wer sagt, dass er es über Flickr2commons verschoben hat. Ich habe als Anfänger auch Fotos lokal gespeichert und dann irgendwann hochgeladen. wenn es korrekt geht, fällt das niemanden auf. --K@rl (talk) 18:22, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

File:IMG 0690.jpgEdit

 
File:IMG 0690.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Smiley.toerist (talk) 21:37, 16 January 2020 (UTC)


Transfer to CommonsEdit

Hi Túrelio. Could the following images be transferred to Commons? And if possible, could you do it? Thank you.--Xabier (talk) 21:07, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi Xabier,
I'll look into it on saturday. --Túrelio (talk) 22:54, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Thank you anyway. Another user has already transferred them.--Xabier (talk) 17:14, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

That was me. --Túrelio (talk) 17:21, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

One was missing here. Can you transfer it to Commons? Thank you (veo que hablas español, era ver si podías transferir esta imagen también. Estamos trabajando en el artículo de Lovecraft en español para proponerlo a artículo bueno).--Xabier (talk) 15:48, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Jochen A. WernerEdit

Just leaving a note since I remember you speak German. But someone may want to check this for appropriateness. It seems likely to be spam/promotional. GMGtalk 15:26, 27 January 2020 (UTC)


Rampant copyright infringementsEdit

Hello. I come from English Wikipedia, and when a contributor is known to have 4-5 or more flagrant copyright violations, we open an investigation of all their contributions, because the violations we find are often merely the "tip of the iceberg". I wonder if any process is available here on Commons, where copyright is possibly much more likely to be infringed? As you know, I have examined the contributions of User:Thuy Ho and found the vast majority to be copyright violations. Administrators have mostly agreed with me, except for a few instances where you merely reverted because you couldn't find any evidence. I suggest that this contributor be investigated. I left some of his uploads alone because they appeared to be simple non-professional panoramic type snapshots that could be taken by anyone. But some people surely have a knack for stealing photos and presenting them as "Own work" and slipping by the copyright filter here. I find them once in a while coming to English Wikipedia and linking to their uploads. I strive to be thorough in wiping out their contributions when I can plainly see they are all copyvios. Is there any help or relief for people like me? Or should I just do them one at a time? Elizium23 (talk) 22:39, 23 March 2020 (UTC)


Offensichtliche URVEdit

Hallo Túrelio,

mir fallen immer wieder offensichtliche URV's auf Commons auf. Schema immer gleich: Niedrige Auflösung für 2019/2020, fehlende Exif-Daten, Pkw-Modelle einer bestimmten Marke, immer wieder neue Accounts mit Ramschuploads (wiederum mit Exif - zur Tarnung?), unterschiedliche Länderkennzeichen und andere Details (mediterrane Landschaft mit Olivenbäumen passt nicht zum tschechischen Kennzeichen). Wegen der niedrigen Auflösung und Unschärfe gehe ich von Screenshots aus Videos aus. Betrifft bis dato folgende User:

Wäre generell für das Löschen eines Großteils der Bilder von neuen Pkw-Modellen und Sperre der User. Was meinst du? Was weiter machen? Danke dir! Pan Tau (talk) 08:28, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Pan Tau, sorry, ich bin bislang noch nicht dazu gekommen. Hoffentlich am Freitag. --Túrelio (talk) 19:11, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi Túrelio, hat keine Eile. Läuft ja nicht davon. :) Liebe Grüße, Pan Tau (talk) 12:28, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Copyright issues with User:QiushufangEdit

Hello. I am contacting you since you were involved in the identification of a copyvio by the said user (1). There is an ongoing discussion about further cases. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 23:04, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Deletion request questionEdit

Hi Túrelio, can you help me see how you can save the images that were nominated in this deletion request [1] Many of those images were uploaded 10 years ago with licenses in the public domain (Egypt, Lebanon, Syria) respectively. A week ago a reviewing user nominated them for deletion saying that the source was not specified. The images are in the public domain from the beginning of the last or mid-century, are all over the internet and are part of the cultural heritage of those countries that used them for their publications in the newspapers. All of these images are only to illustrate Wikipedia posts. Is there any way I can amend them? thanks.--Derbake (talk) 22:03, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Group deleteEdit

Hi, i need a (Commons:Deletion requests/Mass deletion) request for all of my uploads.05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 20:18, 24 April 2020 (UTC)


Speedy deletesEdit

Hallo Túrelio; ich habe in letzter Zeit ein paar offene DRs geschlossen, bei denen auf die Datei in der Zwischenzeit ein Schnelllöschantrag gestellt wurde, den du danach umgesetzt, aber dabei den DR offengelassen hattest, Beispiel Commons:Deletion requests/File:Robert Blaich.jpg (DR-Template stand auch immer noch auf der Seite). Wäre vielleicht ganz praktisch, wenn du in solchen Fällen auch gleich den Löschantrag erledigen würdest. Wollte nur darauf hinweisen, keine grosse Sache :-) Gestumblindi (talk) 01:10, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Danke für die Erinnerung. Hab mir danach Mühe gegeben, immer daran zu denken. --Túrelio (talk) 09:24, 18 June 2020 (UTC)


Filemover rights requestEdit

Hi there. Several days ago, I put in a request for filemover rights over at Commons:Requests for rights, and the guideline at the top of the page says "[i]f your request has remained unanswered for several days, consider personally asking an administrator".

As I said in my nomination, I'm a prolific file uploader with an unfortunate bad habit of typos in filenames, and I would sooner take on the responsibility of correcting such filename errors myself than burden other editors with my mistakes. (In fact, the reason why your username stuck out to me at Special:ListUsers/sysop was because you've answered a few of my rename requests yourself!)

If there's anything you can do to speed the process along, it would be most helpful and appreciated. Thank you.

-- Andre Carrotflower (talk) 04:16, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

CommentEdit

The Cfccreates flickr ID has been a rich source of images of people associated with movies. I've uploaded well over a thousand images they posted on flickr, and about 400 headshots I cropped from those images.

This is the first time they have requested the deletion of an image. I didn't want to say this at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kathryn Emslie at a CFC event in L.A. - Honouring John Fawcett and Graeme Manson (16740223837).jpg - but I think the explanation for the deletion is vanity. Ms Emslie is part of the management team at the Canadian Film Centre. Whoever runs the cfccreates flickr id is presumably a lot more junior than Ms Emslie.

Anyhow, since was one they uploaded, I think File:CFC in L.A. - Honouring John Fawcett and Graeme Manson (16740223837).jpg is unobjectionable.

It never occurred to me to consider the flatteringness of the crop of Ms Emslie. But I don't think File:Virginia Rankin at a CFC event in L.A. - Honouring John Fawcett and Graeme Manson (16740223837).jpg is particularly unflattering. Anyhow, she isn't CFC management. So I am happy to let sleeping dogs lie.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 23:37, 7 May 2020 (UTC)


Category:Victims_of_IslamismEdit

E4024 (talk) 02:13, 13 May 2020 (UTC)


Another favorEdit

May this DR page be deleted please (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stanley Kubrick in Dr. Strangelove Trailer (4) Cropped.jpg)? Not the file, but the page. I connected the main DR to the cropped file so it would be more simple. Thanks! StrangeloveFan101 (talk) 11:27, 24 May 2020 (UTC)


Nepal mapsEdit

Hi Túrelio, please see also File:Nepal 1M N LD.jpg and File:New Official Map of Nepal.png, which I tagged for deletion before I found out how to use CSD. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 08:13, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Roman RetzbachEdit

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Future-Institute?markasread=24314999&markasreadwiki=commonswiki#File:Roman_Retzbach_2020.jpg_was_recently_deleted

I have the permission to use the data (photo, bio, ...) "YvesMe (Wikipedia editor) is allowed to use my data (bio, cv, image, …)" https://future-institute.com/roman-retzbach/ --2003:E4:A740:2280:F170:2461:2B17:8EAF 15:47, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Hallo unbekannte IP,
falls du selbst Roman Retzbach bist, dann sende bitte von deiner offiziellen Emailadresse eine Bestätigung an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org, aus der hervorgeht, dass du der Schöpfer oder Rechteinhaber der jeweiligen Dateien/Fotos bist und diese unter der gewählten freien Lizenz freigeben möchtest. Bitte auch die Dateinamen (hier auf Commons) angeben, damit eine Zuordnung möglich ist. Deine Mail wird nicht veröffentlicht, sondern kann nur von den OTRS-Freiwilligen eingesehen werden. --Túrelio (talk) 16:51, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

BildquelleEdit

Hallo Túrelio, heute bin ich über diese Seite [2] gestolpert. Kann es sein, dass sich bei den Bildern unter dem Link "Quelle" und weiteren Links der Seite nur Spam befindet? Beste Grüße. Orchi (talk) 19:35, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Orchi,
in der Tat. Das ist das typische Bild, wenn der ursprüngliche Domaininhaber eine Seite aufgegeben hat. Die paar Bilder, die ich mir angeschaut habe, sind ja alle 2015 hochgeladen worden. Da sie anscheinend im Kontext irgendeiner Aktion hochgeladen wurden (es gibt ja sogar einen eigenen Baustein), denke ich mal, dass die Lizenz heute nicht unbedingt hinterfragt werden muss; allerdings könnten Nachnutzer durch den heutigen Inhalt des Quuelllinks verärgert werden. Ich werde mal meine Kollegen fragen, ob wir für solche Fälle eine etablierte Vorgehensweise haben. Interessant: bei den ältesten 5 Uploads ist der Inhalt der Quelle noch in Ordnung. --Túrelio (talk) 18:55, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
...die letzten Seiten hatte ich auch gesehen und habe dann etliche Sichproben gemacht. Ich bin mal gespannt, wie wie Du und Deine Kollegen die Angelegenheit sehen. Grüße. Orchi (talk) 19:42, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Reid familyEdit

Please delete the photographs, I was fulfilling a request for a local historian. The fine details required are not available. Many thanks. RSLlGriffith (talk) 08:43, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi Rosser1954,
most important is the age of the original photograph. If it's old enough, we may keep it, even if we don't know the other information. --Túrelio (talk) 08:45, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

File deletedEdit

My file cook_the_blues_are_still_blue_350ppi.jpg was deleted for possible copyright infringement.

The file in question is a photograph of a painting of my own creation. The painting uses parody and significantly alters the original. As a work of art, it does not infringe on any copyright laws. The file was uploaded to Flickr and is a public domain image. Could you undelete the file please?

Benjamincookart (talk) 12:44, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Correction, the file in question is cook_blues_are_still_blue_350ppi.jpg Benjamincookart (talk) 13:07, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi Benjamincookart,
to understand you correctly: at the start of the "chain" there was an original painting or ?, not created by you. Based on this, you created another painting, which technically (and eventually legally) might be considered a derivative of the original. Finally, you took a photography of your painting. Right?
I am aware that in art there is a longstanding tradition to create new works based (to a different degree) on previous works of others. However, in modern times (copyright laws) and especially here on Commons, where we claim that all material may be legally re-used in any manner, including commercial use, the chain of copyright needs to be evaluated properly.
Back to your case: if the original is out of copyright already, there is no problem for derivatives. If the original is still in copyright, it needs to be evaluated whether your work is legally a derivative of the other original and thereby may infringe the other artists copyright. As such an evaluation is complicated, it cannot be made on my talkpage. I would consider putting the image into a regular deletion-request, which allows a broad discussion and input from others, provided there is at least a reasonable perspective for not being a derivative. As has already be hinted at Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2020-07#Cook_Blues_Are_Still_Blue_350ppi.jpg, the typical exceptions used by the media (press) and in critical commentary, i.e. the fair-use clause, is not applicable here, as Commons is legally not allowed to host such material. If you want to use the image only or mainly on :en Wikipedia, you should drop the case here and try local upload at :en, claiming fair-use. --Túrelio (talk) 06:59, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Лисагор (File:Artwork. Lisagor Portrait.jpg)Edit

Я увлекаюсь графикой, портретами архитекторов 20 века. Они все умерли. Поэтому я изучаю их прижизненные фотографии и создаю свою графику. У меня несколько графических портретов, в том числе Лисагора. Я сейчас помещу ещё один на склад, это моя работа. Вы её тоже поставите на удаление? --Elena4gb (talk) 03:05, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi Elena4gb,
you claimed File:Artwork. Lisagor Portrait.jpg to be own work from 2020, whereas User:Lesless, who had copyvio-tagged the image, found that the depicted person had died in the 1930ies and that the image was not originally your work. When you upload images (or other media) to Commons, you neeed to take care that it is truely your own work or is evidently already in the public domain. In most countries of the world, copyright stays with the original creator until 70 years after his/her death. --Túrelio (talk) 07:05, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Is it okay if I revive a category?Edit

Hello, Túrelio. I have uploaded File:9 deletion requests, which contains a gray number 9. Is it okay if I revive that category? User:The SVG Effect 13:50, 11 Jul 2020

Sure.   Done. --Túrelio (talk) 21:46, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Photo deletedEdit

Hello. You deleted the photo of File:MuslimNazaev.jpg because: "This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: http://wsport.su/2010/08/?print=print-search +watermark"

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%B5%D0%B2,_%D0%9C%D1%83%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BC_%D0%9C%D1%83%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87 — Preceding unsigned comment added by NaimFR (talk • contribs) 10:02, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

First, I would like to inform you that I was the coach of this athlete (who, incidentally, is my nephew) and this was my own photo. Secondly, I am the author and owner of the website WSPORT-SHATOY - http://wsport.su For many years this photo was on Wikipedia and no one had any questions.

My name is Movladi Abdoulaev

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D0%B1%D0%B4%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B5%D0%B2,_%D0%9C%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B8_%D0%90%D0%B1%D1%83%D1%8F%D0%B7%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87 — Preceding unsigned comment added by NaimFR (talk • contribs) 10:00, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

You also deleted a photo of my father, despite the fact that I pointed out that my own photo.

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D0%B1%D0%B4%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B5%D0%B2,_%D0%90%D0%B1%D1%83%D1%8F%D0%B7%D0%B8%D1%82_%D0%90%D0%B1%D0%B4%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87 — Preceding unsigned comment added by NaimFR (talk • contribs) 10:07, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi NaimFR,
with regard to File:MuslimNazaev.jpg: The fact that this image was on Commons since 2017 has little relevance. Just 2 days ago we became aware of an image that was on Commons since 2015 and claimed to be under a free license, when in fact it was a shot by an agency-photographer. We were notified because a re-user had to pay 300 Euros in license-fees to the agency. In order to avoid such problems we try to check all images thoroughly. How should we know of your relation to wsport.su? So, if you really shot this photo by yourself, send a confirmation from your official wsport email address to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org or to permissions-ru@wikimedia.org (in Russian) and confirm that you are the photographer or the rightsholder. Thereafter I can restore the image. --Túrelio (talk) 10:44, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
with regard to File:Abdulaev abuyazit.jpg: this image was a duplicate of File:Абуязид Абдулаевич Абдулаев, 1974г..jpg and therefore redirected. --Túrelio (talk) 10:46, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Repeated fileEdit

Hello, how are you, my friend. I want to ask you a question: is it allowed to create multiple files of the same style? A user created a file equal to another and I consider that it is unnecessary since it is the same. Check the following:

File:AMLO 2020.jpg and File:President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador in the White House (cropped).jpg

The last one already has several days created, it is better to load the format for the last file and not create each style. Sorry if I don't link, I don't know how to do it.--Dimartz (talk) 16:14, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi Dimartz,
I've now linked the 2 files; you can see the required code.
With regard to your question: generally, one should avoid uploading true duplicates (will be speedy-deleted) or near-duplicates (require a deletion-request). However, in this specific case it is justifiable IMO to have the 2 variants of this crop. Some people might prefer the version where the head is positioned exactly vertically, others where the head appears to be slightly tilted; it's depending on personal taste. As both variants are currently in use, we should keep them both. --Túrelio (talk) 18:47, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Admin's Barnstar
Ganz herzlichen Dank für die prompte Löschung der Dateien! Swiss National Library (talk) 09:08, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Another similar fileEdit

Hi Túrelio, I noticed that you just deleted a file on FOP grounds. There is another image of the same statue that I flagged as a copyvio on the same FOP grounds yesterday, but that was converted to a deletion request: Commons:Deletion requests/File:A Surge of Power (Jen Reid) 15th July 2020.jpg. I don't know if you want to contribute there, or whether it affects the file you already deleted, but I thought I'd better let you know about it. -- DeFacto (talk). 10:30, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I've seen this thereafter. However, due to the current attention to the underlying topic, it seems wise to me to leave the deletion-discussion open for a few days. Otherwise this image might be uploaded again and again. --Túrelio (talk) 10:40, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

KritzingerEdit

Hallo Túrelio, ich bin nicht ganz glücklich über die Neuanlage von Category:Friedrich Wilhelm Kritzinger. Es deutet einiges darauf hin, dass der Rufname "Wilhelm" war (seine Werke hat er überwiegend nur als "Wilhelm" oder "F. Wilhelm" publiziert), und ich versuche gerade zu klären, ob de:Friedrich Wilhelm Kritzinger (Theologe) nicht auf das einfachere Lemma verschoben werden sollte, wohingegen der Namensvetter de:Friedrich Wilhelm Kritzinger (Ministerialdirektor) wohl wirklich unter dem Doppel-Vornamen bekannter ist, und Category:Friedrich Kritzinger dementsprechend besser dieses Lemma erhielte. --FordPrefect42 (talk) 14:03, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi,
ja, kein Problem. Du kannst es ggf. einfach verschieben; hat ja nur 1 subcat. Schön wäre es, wenn man ein Bild von ihm finden würde; zumal das ja längst PD sein sollte. --Túrelio (talk) 15:00, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Werde ich wahrscheinlich machen, wenn ich die Literatur ganz ausgewertet habe. Es gibt [3], aber ohne erkennbare Quellenangabe, also keine Ahnung, ob das authentisch ist. --FordPrefect42 (talk) 20:21, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

V Madhusoodanan Nair Sahithya Akademi PictureEdit

Hello Túrelio, this message concerns the deletion of a picture of Prof. V Madhusoodanan Nair receiving the Sahithya Akademi Award. This picture was taken with the permission of V Madhusoodanan Nair, therefore, I do not understand why the picture was deleted under a copyright violation. Please let me know the reason the picture was deleted, thank you for understanding :). Below is the link of the file being deleted

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:V_Madhusoodanan_Nair_Sahithya_Akademi.jpg

Thank you!Vmadhgrand (talk) 20:21, 16 July 2020 (UTC) Vmadhgrand 7/16/2020

Hi Vmadhgrand,
the image was deleted as it had been tagged by another user for copyvio-suspicion as he had found it published on another website. This evidence alone was a bit weak. However, the image-file also had no metadata (EXIF), which would be rather unusual for a photo shot by a modern camera.
So, to get this straight: Did you really shoot this photo by yourself or did you get from somebody/smoewhere? Also, I am not sure what you meant by "picture was taken with the permission"? This could mean he allowed you to photograph him, which would be rather unnecessary in the depicted situation, or he allowed you to take it from is website or something. --Túrelio (talk) 20:33, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

To be deletedEdit

Hi, I would like to delete these photos because there are the same photos on wikimedia commons, also because I have written bad titles it is totally to be deleted, I would like you to delete them Thank you

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Patrioti_etiopici_impiccati_da_terroristi_fascisti_italiani.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Soldati_italiani_che_impiccano_un_patriota_etiopico.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fucilazione_di_un_patriota_etiopico_durante_la_campagna_di_terrorismo_degli_italiani_fascisti.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Soldato_italiano_con_la_testa_decapitata_di_un_patriota_etiopico.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Patrioti_etiopici_impiccati_da_terroristi_fascisti_italiani_1.jpg Thanks--Gilberto Tzahi Turati (talk) 16:38, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi,
done already by Green Giant. --Túrelio (talk) 08:58, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

File:120923 경주 한류 드림콘서트 씨스타 02.jpgEdit

Hi, not sure why File:120923 경주 한류 드림콘서트 씨스타 02.jpg was deleted as a duplicate of File:120923 경주 한류 드림콘서트 씨스타 01.jpg. The pictures were probably taken a fraction of a second apart, but they are not the same file. COM:CSD#F8 requires an exact copy, which it was not. ƏXPLICIT 23:49, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Right, I've overlooked the small difference. Now restored. --Túrelio (talk) 14:49, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Karan Johar and Abhishek Bachchan on the sets of KANK (2).jpgEdit

Hi, you have reverted my edit in this file. But as far I know Bollywood Hungama licensed some of their photos under CC-BY-3.0 via OTRS ticket:2008030310010794. This include only photographs of parties and events taken by their own photographers. And every other photos published in this site are copyrighted. Regards.মোহাম্মাদ ইসমাইল (talk) 17:07, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi মোহাম্মাদ ইসমাইল,
I've seen you have tagged a number of these images for speedy-deletion. I would recommend you to put them all together into one regular (not speedy) deletion-request. That makes it easier to come to a consistent decision. Otherwise it remains a sort of judgement-call, depending on who processes your speedies. --Túrelio (talk) 18:37, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Continuous Copyright ViolationsEdit

Hi Túrelio DineshRedbull is just violating rules and playing with the system by uploading copyright images via Flickr to avoid scrutiny. The user has been warned earlier but still violating rules. Please have a look. Thank you ~ Amkgp 💬 10:27, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for notifying. Images deleted and Flickr-account added to black list. --Túrelio (talk) 15:04, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
@Túrelio: DineshRedbull has created a new account VirendersinghUP and is uploading copyright violation picture via same flickr account. Please have a look. Thank you ~ Amkgp 💬 15:34, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Blocked. --Túrelio (talk) 14:45, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
@Túrelio: Another sock DhruvKumarJogi and again same copyright violations. Thank you ~ Amkgp 💬 18:37, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Nothing to fear.jpgEdit

Hey there. Several Houres ago you removed a file that I uploaded a day ago under name of "Nothing_to_fear". I received a notification waith a copyrights violation warning. just letting you know, this picture was already uploaded by another user but I wasn't able to attach it to the article that I was working on. I translated https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nothing_to_Fear_(song) to Farsi but the artwork wasn't able on Farsi database so I tried to upload one more time in order to use it in the same order that it was used in the English version. AshkHead (talk)

Hi AshkHead,
I see. With the other "picture" you are likely refaering to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Chris_Rea_Nothing_to_Fear_1992_single_cover.jpg. However, when you look at that site, you can see clearly that this image 1) is not on Commons, and 2) is claimed as "fair-use", which is legal construction of U.S. copyright-law. Such material is not allowed on Commons. The image itself shows the artwork of an album cover. Such images are usually always copyrighted, either with the record company or with the artists. So, you need to obtain a valid permission from the rights-holder before uploading it to Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 06:57, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Harris + Hoole logo.svgEdit

Hi! This logo is too simple even under British law. If you disagree, please start a DR and let more users decide.--RZuo (talk) 12:56, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi,
are you aware that this image was originally uploaded under fair-use and of the tagger's statement "the copyright holder's website[4] states: "No licence is granted to you in these Terms and Conditions to use any trade mark of Harris + Hoole or its affiliated companies" ? --Túrelio (talk) 14:36, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
It's too simple to be copyrighted. It doesnt meet COM:TOO. Whatever their statement is does not matter. Trademark right is different from copyright.--RZuo (talk) 15:00, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
@RZuo: I think this is above UK TOO. I think it is about as simple w:File:EDGE_magazine_(logo).svg, which was found to be copyrightable in the UK [5] [6] by the w:High Court of Justice. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 19:34, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
EDGE is stylised. This is just a string of letters put inside a rectangle, on par with BBC logos.--RZuo (talk) 19:40, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
@RZuo: I've undeleted the image and put it into a regular DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Harris + Hoole logo.svg, to allow for discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 10:15, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Emydocephalus annulatus.jpgEdit

Hi Túrelio, you deleted File:Emydocephalus annulatus.jpg yesterday a few hours after being flagged by ‎user:INaturalistReviewBot. I'm a bit surprised of the short notice since the bot says I have 7 days to provide the required missing infos. Now the file is deleted, I can no longer recover the source link to check this out. I would like to understand what happen, this would help me to either not reproduce the same mistake or provide the missing info. Can you help me out ? Thanks in advance.--Hiouf (talk) 08:25, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi Hiouf,
here is the source-link: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/19644808
As you can see, it's clearly labeled as "All rights reserved". This was the reason for me to speedy-delete it, in order to save inadvertent external re-users from litigation for copyright-infringement. Of course, feel free to try to convince the photographer to release this image under a free license (CC-BY or CC-BY-SA). I will then gladly undelete it. --Túrelio (talk) 09:16, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for your quick reply. I do see the licence CC-BY-SA, just under the list of best identifiers. You can even see in the comments that I asked the observer to change the licence. However, it is true that if you click on the information button for the photo, you go to another page that mentions "All rights reserved". It's like there are 2 licences for the same photo ? Strange, what do you think ? cheers --Hiouf (talk) 09:47, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
You might try to contact him directly via Email. --Túrelio (talk) 11:03, 25 July 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fan272 234 (talk • contribs) 12:44, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
@Hiouf: iNaturalist allows users to apply different licenses to their photos and their "observations", similarly to how we allow files in a myriad of different licenses but all file description pages are cc-by-sa-3.0. The photo license is displayed in an icon in the bar near the bottom of the photo and on the photo information page: https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/30249715. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 18:10, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Got it. Thanks for the help guys! Cheers.--Hiouf (talk) 08:44, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the deletionEdit

I talked to a fotographer who agreed to one of her works being published in Wikipedia under CC 3.0. I uploaded the file, so it could be unambiguously identified in the letter by the link, sent her a mail asking for her formal permission according to the preliminary agreement, and wrote on the talk page of the file that OTRS is pending, in the hope that anyone feeling the urge to delete would read it and restrain themselves for a couple of days. You, on the other hand, decided that ignoring the notice would be a much more rational approach. Now, pray tell, what in your mind would be the correct procedure for files that are in the process of getting OTRS confirmation, to avoid such behaviour as yours? --Ehitaja (talk) 10:36, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi,
I didn't see your notice on the talkpage. You should have put it on the image-page. When you get a positive signal from OTRS, drop me a note and I will undelete it. --Túrelio (talk) 15:09, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Well, back when I started in Wikipedia in 2004, talk pages were used for talking about the content pages, so discussions would not be held on the content pages. If there's a new policy for ignoring those, is there also some new template for the "OTRS incoming, do not delete" message or should I just write it on the top in big red letters? It seems I really can't keep in touch with all the new developments here. --Ehitaja (talk) 10:47, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
If you want to be formally correct, put {{OTRS pending}} on the top of the image-page. However, even an informal remark like "permission from rightsholder sent to OTRS" would alert the processing admin. --Túrelio (talk) 10:55, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Well, I got the confirmation mail from the photographer and forwarded it to the et-permissions address but I'm not sure when exactly they might get to it. I'll try to poke some folks to move it along. It might go easier, though, if there was a place they could attach their plaque. --Ehitaja (talk) 16:46, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
I've temp-restored the image and added the OTRS-template. Yes, processing permissions is often rather delayed, as our OTRS volunteers are overworked. --Túrelio (talk) 18:36, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Pristimantis academicus.jpgEdit

Hi. Could you please provide the source URL for File:Pristimantis academicus.jpg? I'd like to make sure there are no archives, as there were for certain files here. Best, --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 21:43, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

"Hrm. Wayback Machine has not archived that URL." Neither has archive.is. There might be other archives though for the source. De728631 (talk) 21:54, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Yeah, was CC-BY-NC since Jul 2017. Thanks for looking! --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 22:05, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Maroc Telecom Logo (File:Maroc Telecom Logo.png)Edit

You kinda broke the Maroc Telecom logo on several wikis, but thanks for deleting Anomper012 (talk) 21:30, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi Anomper012,
well, when an image is considered unfree and needs to be deleted, one cannot avoid that its uses are removed. If the projects, which used this image, have an exemption-policy, such as "fair-use" on :en, you may upload it locally on these projects. --Túrelio (talk) 06:31, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

HelpEdit

Hi, could you please help me with File:Hunter Valley Vineyards (23756328125).jpg. I uploaded this and 39 other files from Flickr. They are all in public domain. But something went wrong. I'm not sure what to do.মোহাম্মাদ ইসমাইল (talk) 23:15, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi,
sorry, but I will be too busy in RL today. Contrary to what it seems, images on Flickr carrying the "public domain mark" are not necessarily really in the public domain. It's complicated and a mess; see Commons:Requests_for_comment/Flickr_and_PD_images#Status_of_PD_Mark_1.0. AFAIK, you need to verify whether the Flickr-user, who offers such images, is really the photographer, as only he/she can put an image into the PD. If you are sure about that, then you might use the PD-Author template. The safest way would be to contact the Flickr-user directly and ask him to either change the license on Flickr to CC-BY or alike or to confirm the PD-Author license to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 07:05, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

User Dldf23Edit

Hi! User Dldf23 received last warning back in December[7], yet he continues to upload photos from web under false self made claim[8].--Oleola (talk) 03:19, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Blocked. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 08:10, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

File:A Lifetime Tan (61877709).jpegEdit

Hi, this image is in Commons under CC-BY-SA-3.0 license. But it was publish on Flickr under CC-BY-SA-2.0. It's also in Instagram. Is it OK here?মোহাম্মাদ ইসমাইল (talk) 05:34, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi মোহাম্মাদ ইসমাইল,
thanks for your attentiveness. I think we can ignore the Flickr-hit as 1) it contains Facebook/Instagram code in its metadata (so was obviously copied from there), and 2) is a crop from our version. The name of the account-holder on Instagram is identical to the author-name for our image. Our version has full metadata, which is confirmative for the assumption that the original author released the image also on 500px, from where it was copied to Commons. The only thing a bit suspicious is that the metadata contain the statement "© 2014 Makia Minich, All Rights Reserved", despite being a released on 500px. --Túrelio (talk) 08:06, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for answering. Is there anything we can do about the metadata statement? Or should we just ignore it?মোহাম্মাদ ইসমাইল (talk) 10:35, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Deletion of files uploaded by User talk:Yankees999Edit

Hi Túrelio. I noticed at User talk:Yankees999 that you deleted UB Stadium.jpg. Another file uploaded by the same user is also a copyright violation. I nominated it for deletion over a month ago. It's at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Zack Hample Posing With Baseballs In 2016.jpg. Could you possibly take a look at that one as well? Thank you. JimKaatFan (talk) 23:43, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. All his uploads deleted. --Túrelio (talk) 09:10, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Thank you! JimKaatFan (talk) 15:56, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Photo rightsEdit

wiki professionals was trying to update my wiki page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Davis_(filmmaker)). I gave them a photo of me and you took it down. They told me that you wanted to speak directly to me about the photo rights. It is my photo and I own all rights. How can it be put up on my page? thank you. Ron — Preceding unsigned comment added by Docuron (talk • contribs) 20:30, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi Ron,
this is about File:Ron Davis (Film maker).jpg, which had been uploaded more than 2 months ago by JoseMartin(Rubia) (talk · contribs), who claimed it as own work. However, a recent-uploader patroler found it published at https://www.imdb.com/name/nm2861672/mediaviewer/rm3448336384 and thereby suspicious of being a copyvio, the more as this user has uploaded more copyvios. Consequently, I've deleted the image 2 days after its tagging. User JoseMartin(Rubia)} had been notified about the problem, but didn't react. As you aren't the uploader, you weren't notified. Now, even, if you gave this image to the uploader (though you wrote of "wiki professionals"), it would not have been o.k. to claim it as own work by the uploader.
If you are indeed Don Davis, you need to make sure that you own enough copyright in this image from the photographer to release it under a free license, as required by our (COM:L) and Wikipedia's policy. If that is really the case, you need to jump to Commons:Email_templates#Email_message_template_for_release_of_rights_to_a_file, copy the text in the grey box, enter the Commons filename of the image, eventually add the name of the photographer (depending on what the contract says), sign and date it and mail it from your official/business email address to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 21:03, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

File:ETH-BIB-Bazenheid-LBS H1-010793.tifEdit

Hi Túrelio, File:ETH-BIB-Bazenheid-LBS H1-010793.tif is not a duplicate and was imported from http://doi.org/10.3932/ethz-a-000352918. Would you mind restoring the file? Thank you! --1-Byte (talk) 10:43, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi 1-Byte,
restored. But our software says it's a duplicate. --Túrelio (talk) 10:48, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Thank you, it seems it was accidentally replaced by the detected duplicate. --1-Byte (talk) 12:17, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

HiEdit

Yamla began again. BTW is this file taken from a copyrighted site or not? --E4024 (talk) 16:22, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi, you meant YAMLAISVERTYLIKELYHITER (talk · contribs)? Blocked already. --Túrelio (talk) 18:44, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi2, the file seems to be o.k. At the bottom of the source-site, there is a note "All materials on this site are posted under the terms of the license CC-BY 4.0" (translat.) --Túrelio (talk) 20:32, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

G10Edit

Hi. Can you please delete the spam left by User:MAKANYC? My fingers are aching due to F10 edits. :) Thanks a lot. --E4024 (talk) 05:04, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:13, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Helo mr. Turelio!Edit

Please contact me for inappropriate removal of data. handtheatre@gmail.com Best regards! Ивомир Инатов —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 46.10.102.199 (talk) 20:23, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi Ивомир Инатов,
please log-in and use this link to contact me. However, it would be better if you could post your question or complaint here. --Túrelio (talk) 10:25, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Permit to use mother’s Theresa pictureEdit

Hi Túrelio I am hereby informing you that I will use your picture for a video for a few seconds. It is for a non profit catholic online tv Channel. It Is going to be a short Clip about mother’s Teresa. Thank you very much for uploading it and if you need additional information about the Chanel please let me know. Paula BallestEros R. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2601:703:100:3D1:7892:6CDA:6899:C431 (talk) 14:39, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi Paula,
thanks for notifying. In case your video is publicly accessible, I would be glad to get the URL. --Túrelio (talk) 19:17, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Flickr-emailEdit

Hi. how exactly can one "Flickr-email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" when Flickrmail doesn't touch the outside world?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 06:55, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi, AFAIK, when you have a Flickr-account, you also get an associated email-address (at least this was formerly so). Due to this association it can easily be used for confirmation (without the need for an additional crediting process). --Túrelio (talk) 07:48, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Request for independent viewsEdit

Hi, Túrelio please have a look if interested Commons:Deletion requests/File:Serum-institute-of-india-logo.png. Thank you. ~ Amkgp 💬 18:41, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020Edit

 

Hallo T%C3%BArelio,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2020 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Es haben sich auch Kulturdenkmale verändert, sie wurden saniert oder umgestaltet. Diese Entwicklung kann auch gezeigt werden. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab 5. September 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams Z thomas 15:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Ala Hadrat.jpgEdit

Kindly reply whatake you 😊not to delete it2401:4900:1B12:B4D:5CDE:15ED:1CB2:2DE2 16:42, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Turilio, I looked that you have removed the duplicate template place by me on the File:Ala hasrat.jpg, will you please tell me why have you not delete this copy right violated image?????? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 401:4900:1B12:B4D:5CDE:15ED:1CB2:2DE2 (talk • contribs)

Hi, I just removed the template-doublette, as it doesn't make sense to have the same template twice. --Túrelio (talk) 16:46, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
I have opened a regular DR, as this image might already be PD. --Túrelio (talk) 18:24, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Will you please be clear, I can't understand your language, as far as I know you are admin on this wiki, so I am just asking why have you not deleted this 🌿2401:4900:1B12:B4D:5CDE:15ED:1CB2:2DE2 18:36, 22 August 2020 (UTC)18:28, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ala Hadrat.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 18:57, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

About an "official" photoEdit

Good afternoon, I hope you are well, I have a question. Can you review this file? (File:Presidente Bukele.jpg) Apparently it is an official photo but it would have to have a free license for its use. The user assures that it is free.--Dimartz (talk) 23:22, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi,
it's possibly a copyvio. I've opened a DR. --Túrelio (talk) 09:57, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi,
Why are you assuming that's a copyvio and I don't have the rights to share my own work? It's impossible that the URL shared by Dimartz which makes reference to a PDF uploaded to my government webpage in wich is the photo of the President of El Salvador have the same quality of the image that uploaded here. Common sense guys. Let me know what I have to do to show that this image is from my property.
Regards, AndreX (talk) 03:42, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
As it's at least unlikely that a government would use a photo of a Wikipedian as an official photo. --Túrelio (talk) 18:22, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Category:Chréa National ParkEdit

Hi Túrelio,
The correct name is Chréa National Park, not Chrea National Park. See Chréa National Park
Mouh2jijel [Talk] 16:24, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi Mouh2jijel,
feel free to recreate the correct cat. --Túrelio (talk) 18:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Duplicate requestEdit

Hi Túrelio. Would you mind redirecting this duplicate to Denis Thatcher 1988.tif? Thanks, ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 07:57, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

MeldungenEdit

Hallo Túrelio, dies ist wahrscheinlich nicht der korrekte Weg, eine Nachricht an Dich zu schicken, oder?

Ich habe Dir zwei E-Mails geschickt. Interessant wäre für mich auch, wie Nachrichten - z.B. an Dich - mit dem Glockensymbol bzw. mit dem Kästchensymbol erzeugt werden können. Für Deine Hilfe wäre ich Dir dankbar. Grüße Dagoheri Dagoheri (talk) 07:56, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Painting duplicateEdit

Hi Túrelio, you deleted File:Antonello da Messina, , Kunsthistorisches Museum Wien, Gemäldegalerie - Maria mit Kind und den Hll. Nikolaus von Bari, Anastasia (^), Ursula, Dominikus und (vom Rahmen über - GG 2574 - Kunsthistorisches Museum.jpg as a duplicate of File:Antonello da Messina - Madonna with the Saints Nicholas of Bari, Lucia, Ursula and Dominic - Google Art Project.jpg. The colors are complete different and it's from a different source. This file should have never been deleted as a duplicate. Please undo this deletion and be a bit more careful in the future. Multichill (talk) 20:48, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi Multichill,
I've undeleted the file. However, when again comparing the images (1 vs. 2), which I had done before the deletion, I don't see any difference in colors. If there really is, then my monitor seems to be unable to show it and I would then refrain from touching any paintings. --Túrelio (talk) 08:07, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Thank you. The first one is slightly darker. Google seems to have had (or still has) a habit of taking high resolution images with natural coloring and adjusting the colors to make it look better (just like in advertising). I recall being at a GLAM partner many years ago and the people at their photo studio were quite upset about that. If you open the two of them in two tabs and switch between them you should be able to see the difference in color. Multichill (talk) 12:26, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Disruptive editsEdit

Hi. IP 46.132.191.22 is removing legitimate copyvio tags from files. Thanks for your attention. --E4024 (talk) 13:27, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Taken care of. --Túrelio (talk) 14:59, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

G3. Content intended as vandalism, threat, or attackEdit

Hallo Túrelio, sei doch bitte mal so nett und bearbeite File:Drapeau LGBT.jpg. Wenn Du der Meinung bist, dass das Arschabwischen mit der Regenbogenfahne der Lesben und Schwulen kein G3 ist, auch ok. Dann stelle ich einen LA. Danke Dir und frohes Schaffen noch. Adelfrank (talk) 14:28, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Gelöscht, da kaum eigenes Werk. --Túrelio (talk) 15:30, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

TweetEdit

Hi. I do not know which tweets are accepted and which not. The one at File:Yasa teklifi.png shows sensitive personal information about someone. IMO it should be speedily deleted. It does not help Commons at any way either. Thanks for your attention. --E4024 (talk) 15:56, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Upload, deleted, upload, deleted, uploadEdit

Hallo Túrelio, hast Du große Ahnung von Technik im Zusammenhang mit Server-Adressen? Kann man an diesen Löschungen noch feststellen, wer der Ersteller war? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ignacio_Hidalgo.jpg `... und ob der Ersteller (nun mit Namen Ignacio Hidalgo angeblich höchstpersönlich) identisch ist: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ignacio_Hidalgo_Actor ? - Der neue uupload vom 2.9. knapp 3 Std., nach dem gestrigen Löschen, und der Löschung 3 Tage zuvor. - Und jedesmal ist der Hochlader des Bildes zu dusselig category:actors einzugeben, erst der Bot setzt actor zu actors um. - Wenn Du der falsche Ansprechpartner bist; weißt Du, wer oder wo jemand Askunft geben kann? Adelfrank (talk) 20:31, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi,
Server-Adressen? Keine Ahnung.
Unter dem o.g. Dateinamen wurden 2 völlig unterschiedliche Fotos hochgeladen, von denen der Hochlader (User:Sakery und User:Mhior) jeweils behauptete auch der Autor zu sein. Die anschließend von Ignacio Hidalgo Actor (talk · contribs) hochgeladene Datei File:Ignacio-hidalgo.jpg ist identisch mit der von Mhior hochgeladenen. Vermutlich ist ersterer also eine SP von letzterem; dazu passt auch der Konto-Anmeldezeitpunkt. Andererseits konnte ich das zuletzt hochgeladene Foto im Web nicht finden. Insofern kann man das no-perm-Speedy erstmal weiterlaufen lassen. --Túrelio (talk) 06:50, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Nix zu finden? https://www.imdb.com/name/nm5617188/mediaviewer/rm758882305?ref_=nm_ov_ph - Na, warten wir mal 7 Tage ob eine Lizenz kommt, ich behalte das im Auge. Adelfrank (talk) 15:04, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Deleted File:Dave Leduc challenging his opponent with the Lekkha Moun.pngEdit

Similar to what happen here File:Dave Leduc vs Thai Inmate at Prison Fight Thailand 2014.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Dave_Leduc_vs_Thai_Inmate_at_Prison_Fight_Thailand_2014.jpg

I recently understood that once a picture is uploaded on IMBD, you somehow forfeit your rights. I previously had given permission to Mr. Leduc's management team to use it on his IMBD profile, unaware that It would be waiving the rights to the photograph. I since asked them to remove the picture and it has since be been successfully deleted. According to the initial nomination rationale: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm8918301/mediaviewer/rm1932759809 the picture is not there anymore. Lethweimaster (talk)

  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:23, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Balkan 250 K motorcycle.pngEdit

Hello, I recently uploaded this image and it got deleted due to possible copyright violation, but I have got permission from the owner of the image via email to use it, is it possible to somehow un-delete it? I am currently new to Commons and have next to none copyright knowledge, sorry if I am asking a stupid question. MotoJawaCZ (talk) 07:58, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi MotoJawaCZ,
you need to forward said permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. They will evaluate it, which may allow the undeletion of the image. However, the permission needs to be under a license, which allows also commercial use and creation of derivatives (see COM:L), such as the recommended license CC-BY-SA 3.0 [9]. A mere "permission for Wikipedia" is not enough. --Túrelio (talk) 08:09, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Jossi Wieler.jpgEdit

Hi Turélio,

can you please restore? We have a release from the photographer at OTRS.

Thanks, greetings --Mussklprozz (talk) 09:23, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Mussklproz,   Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:28, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
¡muchas gracias! --Mussklprozz (talk) 09:47, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks a lotEdit

Thanks for your speedy deletion of my uploads. There was personal information in the exif data.

Do you think I can reupload these files once I have cleaned the exif? Yours sincerely,--Le Petit Chat (talk) 15:46, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Category:Griffonia physocarpa - botanical illustrationsEdit

Both images in show two different specias : , Griffonia simplicifolia and Griffonia physocarpa. So they should be in both categories. Michel Chauvet (talk) 19:16, 6 September 2020 (UTC).

Hi,
no objection. However, you should discuss with/notify User:MILEPRI, who had tagged this cat for deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 20:49, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Photo to be deletedEdit

I would like to delete these 3 photos that I published, I was wrong to publish them, thanks--Samuele Redaelli (talk) 08:36, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hanged_Man.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hanged_Man1.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Beheaded_Heads.jpg

Hi can u help delete this image?Edit

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jordan_Yamamoto_Marlins_Park,_2019.jpg#mw-jump-to-license

Because this image violate the rule, it's from https://www.fishstripes.com/2019/7/29/8934375/marlins-throwback-weekend-2019-photo-gallery-recap

And https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/18342184/jordan_yamamoto_delivery_throwback_danis_sosa_FS.jpeg

Yyang Sr. GakupoKaito (talk) 21:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

  Done. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 06:38, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for deleting the incorrect categoryEdit

Dear Túrelió! Thank you very much for deleting the incorrect „G. Heuer & Kirmse X. A.“ category.   --Bizottmány (talk) 18:30, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

jesse davis jazzEdit

I give up!!!!! You guys continuosly permit misinformation,mistakes etc... with little regard to the artist's or person's reputation,career it directly affects but God forbid the person/artist make an honest attempt to rectify or correct said misrepresentation. Do what you will...in fact DELETE MY PROFILE!!! After 35yrs I don't need Wikipedia!

TrueJazzz (talk) 19:05, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

How about playing by the rules? Your upload File:Jesse Davis jazz.jpg was licensed only under a Commons-noncompliant cc-by-nd license. Apart from that, here you are on Commons, not Wikipedia. So, none of the things of your rant have anything to do with me or this project. --Túrelio (talk) 19:09, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi can u help delete this image?Edit

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mills_in_2020.jpg#mw-jump-to-license

It's cropped from MLB Video. https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZiufUwKz_1LgUAnKiSQ2wQN6F4olZ18-bzh96u5qt4oKzvQbo6cpXDR8wif-KmhvzuRoEuadHWDtzDGbiBFVq8X707QwraKQx_1Vn0WI1j2rh5Sa-0AyHxOcWrOS12SYDgAlSZiZd5qVEXLsxdri0gMEhoiCizEM7qD7SCKAr3qNJFQso7yq7ysidRJf6fUTR30jPMT56xUbBy88MuqJn2aHzkaS8qDE5PvDxwSgR3ZAYdUcVtCPPRnSJeTsYB9txNphF7CRYi8Sb_1zKTet_1Hg2Buhf-yuCQB3rVP34YyEA16n4pb4js_1jCQ3YToFO7pBR_13kjdJciAPA7R4qpZVICJdUb0JxSuQ&hl=zh-TW

And

https://www.spox.com/de/video/mlb/2008/mills-sadler-wick-pitch-shutout.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yyang Sr. GakupoKaito (talk • contribs)

Tagged. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 21:36, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

QEdit

Hi. Is it ok for me to tag and delete pages myself? Or should the files be double checked by another admin? --Minoraxtalk 08:44, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi Minorax,
depends a bit. For absolutely blatant copyvios, you can tag and then speedy-delete them. If less good evidence or slight doubt, just tag them. Childp0rn: tag, speedy-delete, block uploader and report to WMF-legal. "Revenge-p0rn" like images and unambiguously attack-images: tag, speedy and likely block uploader. IMO. --Túrelio (talk) 09:05, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Thanks. Kindly delete the files at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Kd.thienluan, I don't want to close a DR I created. --Minoraxtalk 09:15, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

RE:Pala Olimpico imageEdit

Hi, sure, no problem :)--Mannivu · 16:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

File:ReteferroviariaEmiliaRomagna.jpgEdit

Hello. I can assure you that I took the photo at Cervia-Milano Marittima train station. The article you linked to is four years later. The site incronaca.unibo.it has simply took the photo from Commons, already well after it was uploaded by me. I've removed the notice. ----Markko27 (talk) 21:38, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi Markko27,
I didn't mean that you took it from this site; possibly they used your image.
The problem is that the depicted map itself is likely copyrighted. As Italy has no freedom-of-panorama exception, we need a permission from the creator of this map. --Túrelio (talk) 22:15, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

PingEdit

Hello, do you receive notifications from {{Ping}}?! you have written in above that "ATTENTION: Please use my talk page rather than emailing me." is this including {{Ping}} too?!--Editor-1 (talk) 04:51, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi,
in theory yes. But currently I'm a bit overworked and have a lot of "pings". File version deleted, as requested. --Túrelio (talk) 06:58, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  Thank you.--Editor-1 (talk) 15:07, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Re-uploaded filesEdit

Hello, all of the files that were deleted from here for copyrights infringement have been re-uploaded. Is that part of some OTRS related agreement or is it just the user's own initiative to re-upload everything that was deleted? --Glorious 93 (talk) 07:29, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Taken care of. --Túrelio (talk) 07:45, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Global Perspective Analytical Forum.pngEdit

Moin Turélio,

kannst Du die Datei bitte wiederherstellen? Beim OTRS liegt eine Freigabeerklärung vor.

Vielen Dank! --Mussklprozz (talk) 10:24, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:59, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Danke. Von einer anderen OTRS-Agentin gab es jetzt nocht eine Rückfrage, die sich aber nicht auf die Lizenz bezog. Die ist m. E. in Ordnung. Ich habe fürs Erste nur einen OTRS-received-Baustein reingesetzt. --Mussklprozz (talk) 23:16, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

LöschungenEdit

Hallo Túrelio, nach der Diskussion Gestern, habe ich mich mal hinter den neuen Uploads gemacht. Die Ergebnise davon hast du heute großteils gelöscht, danke dafür! Meine Frage ist, ob das was ich mache hilfreich ist oder doch schon an Spam/Vandalismus grenzt. Grüße Oesterreicher12 (talk) 11:44, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi Oesterreicher12,
keine Sorge. Das Kontrollieren der neuesten Uploads ist eine unverzichtbare Aufgabe, die dank des Nichtstuns der WMF und des Widerstands einiger Benutzer leider manuell gemacht werden muss. --Túrelio (talk) 15:46, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

CopyviosEdit

Hello Túrelio, while patrolling I came across these user uploads which I tagged for csd. But I'm not sure about few files. Please have a look here when you're free. Thanks, stay safe. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 07:42, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Porque apagou minha foto?Edit

A foto é para ser usada em dados no Wikipédia — Preceding unsigned comment added by BatistaDi (talk • contribs)

Please sign your comments always.
I assume you are talking about File:Divino B'Atista.jpg, right? Well, this image was considered to be out of the scope of Commons. All your uploads so far, show only yourself. That may be o.k. for Facebook, but not for Commons. Regular contributors may upload 2 or 3 merely personal images. But all your uploads falls into that category. --Túrelio (talk) 14:18, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Crie uma página pra mim?Edit

Olá, eu sou escritor e cantor, e gostaria de ter uma página mais específica com biografia. Se Puder, segue abaixo os dados para a criação da página.--BatistaDi (talk) 09:54, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Divino B'Atista é goiano, nascido em 01 de agosto de 1995 em Ceres / GO, mas cresceu em Porangatu (onde passou grande parte da infância).

Seus livros mais conhecidos, são: “No Último Volume” (2015), a trilogia em co-parceria da autora Malu P. Magalhães: “Três Dias Com Ele” (2018), e a trilogia "Apaixonada Por Um Idiota" (2014), marcando sua estreia na literatura.

Todos os títulos anteriores foram traduzidos para o Inglês, Espanhol e Italiano.

Sua carreira como escritor surgiu logo após uma publicação gratuita de um dos seus livros independentes na plataforma do Wattpad, em 2014, o que rendeu um contrato com uma editora em poucos dias. Contudo, a publicação não aconteceu, já que editora ainda estava crescendo no mercado editorial.

Migrando para outra plataforma digital, a Amazon, viu seus livros crescerem e ganhar um novo patamar.

Atualmente, se denomina como autor independente.

Sua carreira na música surgiu devido ao sonho de dar voz as canções escritas por ele mesmo (em sua maioria para os personagens que sempre acabam envolvidos nesse universo) em seu livros.

Decidido a focar nessas áreas, agora, o investimento também faz parte de sua carreira profissional.


Obras publicadas

• "Apaixonada Por Um Idiota" (versão independente), publicado em 2014.

• “Apaixonada Por Um Idiota” - publicado em 2014 pela editora Clube de Autores.

• “Merry Christmas: Contos Natalinos”, publicado em 2015 pela editora Percurso.

• "No Último Volume", publicado em 2016 pela editora Clube de Autores.

• “In Love With A Fool" (English Edition), publicado em 2016.

• “Innamorata di un IDIOTA!" (Italian Edition), publicado em 2016.

• "Três Dias Com Ele" publicado em 2017 pela editora Clube de Autores.

• “Três Dias Com Ela”, publicado em 2017 pela editora Clube de Autores.

• “Ruim Pra Mim”, publicada em 2018 pela editora Clube de Autores.

• "No Último Volume", (Segunda Edição) publicado em 2018 pela editora Clube de Autores.

• “Merry Christmas: Contos Natalinos”, (Segunda Edição) publicado em 2018 pela editora Clube de Autores.

• "No Simples Compasso da Paixão - Primeiro Episódio", publicado em 2018 pela Clube de Autores.

• “In The Simple Compass of Passion" (English Edition), publicado em 2019.

• “Apasionada por un idiota" (Spanish Edition), publicado em 2019.

• “En El Último Volumen" (Spanish Edition), publicado em 2019.

• “A Tutto Volume" (Italian Edition), publicado em 2019.

• “Tre Giorni Con Lui" (Italian Edition), publicado em 2019.

• “Tre Giorni Con Lei" (Italian Edition), publicado em 2019.

• “Foi Como Andar de Bicicleta”, publicado em 2019 pela editora Clube de Autores.

• “Merry Christmas 2: Contos Natalinos”, publicado em 2019 pela editora Clube de Autores.

• “Three Days With Her" (English Edition), publicado em 2020.

• “Tres Días con Ella" (Spanish Edition), publicado em 2020.

• “Bad for me" (English Edition), publicado em 2020.

• “Contos (D)Escritos Para Serem Lidos Por Você”, publicado em 2020 pela editora Clube de Autores.

• “Casa Comigo Nesse Natal?” (versão estendida), publicado em 2020 pela editora Clube de Autores.


"Fonte: <https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/17201604.Divino_B_Atista>"

"Fonte: <https://clubedeautores.com.br/livros/autores/divino-b-atista>"

"Fonte: <https://www.amazon.com.br/Livros-Divino-BAtista/s?rh=n%3A6740748011%2Cp_lbr_books_authors_browse-bin%3ADivino+B%27Atista>" — Preceding unsigned comment added by BatistaDi (talk • contribs)

Hi BatistaDi,
sorry, but I don't read Portuguese. Anyway, it seems that you think Wikimedia-Commons oder Wikipedia is like Facebook or alike. Well, it is not. People may have an article on Wikipedia when they fulfil the Wikipedia's notability criteria. --Túrelio (talk) 14:11, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Andrea_PalmaEdit

Hi Túrelio, is it okay to restore? There is at lease 1 image now. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 12:33, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 14:11, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I am a singer and writer, and I would like to merge the data into one page.Edit

--BatistaDi (talk) 19:55, 22 September 2020 (UTC)Hello, I am a singer and writer, and I would like to merge the data into one page.--BatistaDi (talk) 19:55, 22 September 2020 (UTC)--BatistaDi (talk) 19:55, 22 September 2020 (UTC)--BatistaDi (talk) 19:55, 22 September 2020 (UTC) I don't want to PROMOTE myself, I just need the page for acceptance and notoriety before society. If possible, could you please do that? I have all the necessary sources I need to confirm data.

File to use on the PAGE: "Divino B'Atista is from Goiás, born on August 1, 1995 in Ceres / GO, but started in Porangatu (where he spent most of his childhood).

His best-known books are: “No Último Volume” (2015), a co-partnership trilogy by the author Malu P. Magalhães: “Três Dias Com Ele” (2018), and the trilogy "Apaixonada Para Um Idiota" (2014) ), marking its debut in literature.

All previous titles have been translated into English, Spanish and Italian.

His career as a writer came shortly after a free publication of one of his independent books on the Wattpad platform in 2014, which earned him a contract with a publisher in a few days. However, the publication did not happen, since the publisher was still growing in the publishing market.

Migrating to another digital platform, Amazon, saw his books grow and gain new heights.

Currently, he calls himself an independent author.

His music career came about due to his dream of giving voice as songs written by himself (mostly for the characters who always end up involved in this universe) in his books.

Decided to focus on these areas, investment is now part of his professional career.


Published works

• "In Love With An Idiot" (independent version), published in 2014.

• “Apaixonada Para Um Idiota” - published in 2014 by Clube de Autores.

• “Merry Christmas: Contos Natalinos”, published in 2015 by the publisher Percurso.

• “In The Las Volume”, published in 2016 by Clube de Autores publisher.

• “In Love With A Fool” (English edition), published in 2016.

• “Innamorata di un IDIOTA!” (Italian edition), published in 2016.

• "Três Dias Com Ele" published in 2017 by Clube de Autores.

• “Três Dias Com Ela”, published in 2017 by the Clube de Autores publisher.

• “Ruim Pra Mim”, published in 2018 by Clube de Autores publisher.

• "In The Las Volume", (Second Edition) published in 2018 by Clube de Autores.

• “Merry Christmas: Contos Natalinos”, (Second Edition) published in 2018 by Clube de Autores publisher.

• “In The Simple Compass of Passion - First Episode”, published in 2018 by Clube de Autores.

• “In The Simple Compass of Passion - First Episode” (English edition), published in 2019.

• “Apasionada por un idiota” (Spanish edition), published in 2019.

• “En El Último Volumen” (Spanish edition), published in 2019.

• “A Tutto Volume" (Italian edition), published in 2019.

• “Tre Giorni Con Lui” (Italian edition), published in 2019.

• “Tre Giorni Con Lei” (Italian edition), published in 2019.

• “It was like riding a bicycle”, published in 2019 by Clube de Autores.

• “Merry Christmas 2: Contos Natalinos”, published in 2019 by Clube de Autores.

• “Three Days With Her” (English edition), published in 2020.

• “Tres Días con Ella” (Spanish edition), published in 2020.

• “Bad for me" (English edition), published in 2020.

• “Tales (D) Written to Be Read by You”, published in 2020 by Clube de Autores publisher.

• "Will you come home with me this Christmas?" (extended version), published in 2020 by the publisher Clube de Autores.

"Source: <https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/17201604.Divino_B_Atista>" "Source: <https://clubedeautores.com.br/livros/autores/divino-b-atista>" "Source: <https://www.amazon.com.br/Livros-Divino-BAtista/s?rh=n%3A6740748011%2Cp_lbr_books_authors_browse-bin%3ADivino+B%27Atista>" -  

Hi BatistaDi,
you are here at Wikimedia-Commons, not Wikipedia. Commons is just a depository for files. Wikipedia is where you want to go. And no, I cannot write an article about you, I don't have time für that. I am just an unpaid volunteer, elected to do administratory work here on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 06:39, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

[[10]]Edit

Um... PNG is lossless, JPEG is preferred for thumbnailing on Wikipedia. I think we've talked about this before - that's not an accusation; this deletion was way back a year ago, but as I think you know, you're not meant to delete the lossless versions, because if any more edits are needed, JPEGs will progressively lose quality, but PNGs won't. Could you please restore it? Thanks! Adam Cuerden (talk) 04:49, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:30, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Thank you! Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:19, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Relevanz in CommonsEdit

Hallo Turelio, ich sehe immer wieder, dass du Fotos löscht oder LA anbringst, mit der Begründung Artikel in WP-de gelöscht. Seit wann ist das Bedingung, dass es in WP-de einen Artikel gibt? - In vielen Fällen österreichischer Artikel übernehmen wir die Artikel in das von WMAT u.a. dafür betriebenen RegiowikiAT, dazu gibt es auch meist einen DS in WD - also seit wann macht WP-de eine Relevanz in Commons, bzw. umgekehrt, verliert ein Foto Relevanz, wenn es keinen Artikel gibt. Da sehe ich keinen wie immer gearteten Zusammenhang. ---- K@rl (talk) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 12:00, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi Karl,
also, dass ich selbst einen LA mit dieser Begründung stelle, kann ich nahezu ausschließen. Seit einigen Monaten werden allerdings vermehrt SLAs von Dritten auf Fotos von "Selbstdarstellern" gestellt, die z.B. auf Wikidata einen Eintrag für sich anlegen, weil auf den Wikipedien keine Chance besteht. Dabei handelt es sich aber üblicherweise nicht um Personen, die für :de oder das erwähnte RegioWiki auch nur infrage kämen. Insofern beziehst du dich sicher nicht auf diese. Wenn mal wieder viele SLAs anstehen, kann es wohl passieren, dass ich die vom Nominierenden eingetragene Löschbegründung einfach übernehme, statt sie auf meine Einschätzung zu korrigieren.(nicht selten besteht da auch URV-Verdacht) Das ist dann, zugegeben, meine Bequemlichkeit. Falls du also eine konkrete Datei vor Augen hast, nur her damit. Ich bin da rel. undogmatisch. --Túrelio (talk) 14:45, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Okay, im speziellen handelt es sich um den Artikel Ameliy mit dem zugegebenerweise nicht optimalen Foto File:Ameliy.jpg - Allerdings möchte ich da den Autor um ein besseres bitten, was natürlich einfacher geht, wenn das alte net unbedingt gleich ungeschaut gelöscht wird. Einen ähnlichen Problemfall habe ich allerdings mit dem Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo-wetscher.jpg, das nicht in dein Resort fällt, aber ich mich mit meinem schwachen englisch leider nicht wehren konnte. Auch hier war die Löschbegründung u.a. Artikel in WP gelöscht. danke für das Verständnis -- K@rl (talk) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 15:20, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
File:Ameliy.jpg ist tatsächlich so ein Fall, wie oben am Ende meiner AW beschrieben. Für mich war das, was in der edit-summary unter 2) steht, maßgeblich. Allerdings hat die Dame derzeit auch auf regiowiki.at keinen Artikel. Leg den doch mal an und gib mir kurz Bescheid, dann stell ich das Bild erstmal wieder her. Danach müsste allerdings die Genehmigung/Lizenz bestätigt werden.
Das Logo File:Logo-wetscher.jpg hatte ich ja mal zu retten versucht, siehe frühe Versionsgeschichte. --Túrelio (talk) 16:29, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, aber den Link für Amelyi hab ic h dir oben rein geschrieben, siehe hier https://regiowiki.at/index.php?title=Ameliy , die Rettung von Wetscher kann ich nicht sehen, da ich nihcht Admin bin. Ein neuer Fall: File:60. Geburtstag der Nationalratspräsidentin Barbara Prammer (11869704436).jpg Dieser Fotograf stellt prinzipiell alle Fotos der SPÖ auf Flickr unter freie Lizenz, es gibt auch genug von ihm hier. ---- K@rl (talk) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 20:45, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Es wird zu viel und zu schnell gelöscht. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Parker, Natalia.jpg ist das Bild einer Selbstdarsellerin aber es ist benutzbar. Dieses konkrete Bild ist unwichtig aber typisch. Warum sollte das gelöscht werden? --Ralf Roletschek 21:10, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Vorher hatte der RegioWiki-Link nicht funktioniert, jetzt doch. Hab File:Ameliy.jpg erstmal entlöscht. Da das Foto aber auch auf Facebook mit "© Lightleaksvisuals" gezeichnet ist, muss eine Bestätigung/Lizenz vom Rechteinhaber an OTRS gehen. --Túrelio (talk) 21:51, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Okay, dann lösche es gleich, ich lasse es aus dem artikel heraus. Ob ich die Agentur noch drauf anrede, muss ich noch überlegen. Und sorry wegen der Störung und nix für ungut. Wegen dieser URV hätte ich es gleich verstanden. aber so ist es ja geklärt. --lg -- K@rl (talk) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 15:13, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Laborate Logo.pngEdit

Hi Túrelio. Can you check to see if this file is the same as File:Laborate hr Logo.jpg that you deleted a few days ago. Same uploader and they might've just re-uploaded the file after the other one had been deleted. I'm not sure if it meets COM:TOO India, but I'm pretty sure it's not "own work". -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:56, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi Marchjuly,
you are right. It's indeed the same image, even though the uploader has added more non-copyright legal information. I've added a company-source for the logo-symbol and the upper line. As the proper way to legalize it on Commons, would be to obtain a permission from the rightsholder, we can let the current no-permission-process run its course. --Túrelio (talk) 08:17, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for taking a look at this. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:27, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Old Deletion RequestsEdit

Hello. Since you are the admin who have been processing all of my deletion requests, I have a favor to ask. Could you take care of the following duplicate deletion requests for me? They are from weeks ago.

I would really appreciate your assistance. Thank you. StellarHalo (talk) 10:44, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

  Done for 2 of them. --Túrelio (talk) 19:11, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Unberechtigte Löschung zweier FotosEdit

Hallo, wie ich festgestellt habe, haben Sie heute zwei Fotos mit den Namen "Danksagung IGS.jpg und "Danksagung INIO.jpg" unbrechtigterweise gelöscht. Beide Fotos waren von mir von dem Original Preisverleihungsdokumenten an Herr Prof. Dr. Hossein Zomorrodian im Iran abgebildet. Die Preisverleihung war im Iran eine öffentliche Veranstaltung und die Originaldokumente wurden dem Publikum präsentiert. Ferner waren die Originaldokumente nach der Preisverleihung im Besitz und somit das Eigentum der oben genannten Person. Als Nachlassverwalter von Prof. Dr. Zomorrodian bin ich von ihm befügt, das Material zu verwalten, abzubilden und auch im Intrnet zu veröffentlichen. Diese Fotos sind für die Wikipediaseite von der genannten Person in persisch vorgesehen und ich habe sogar auch vor der Preisverleihung die Zustimmung der beiden Preisverleiher, indem Fall: "die geophysikalische Gesellschaft im Iran" (IGS) und "das Institut für Ozianographie und Meterologie" im Iran (INIO) zusätzlich eingeholt. Könnten Sie mir bitte erklären, wer und mit welcher Begründung diese beide Fotos als nicht lizensiert eingestuft hat und gelöscht hat. Ich habe bei upload der Bilder, die von mir selbst von dem Original, die in meinem Besitz ist, gemacht worden sind, angegeben, dass ich der Inhaber und der Erzeuger der Bilder bin und über den nötigen Lizenz verfüge. Ferner habe ich bei den Diskussionen für die Fotos nochmal angegeben, dass diese lizensiert sind und fälschlicherweise zum Löschen markiert sind!, Weshalb wurden sie dann trotzdem gelöscht? Ich erwarte, dass die beiden Bilder wierder hergstellt werden! Danke! پژوهشگر تجربی (talk) 18:38, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Sowohl für File:Danksagung INIO.jpg als auch für File:Danksagung IGS.jpg gilt: das abfotographierte Original hat von seiner Gestaltung her ausreichend Schöpfungshöhe und ist daher als urheberrechtlich geschützt zu betrachten. Das Urheberrecht am Original hat diejenige Person, die es geschaffen bzw. entworfen hat, nicht der Besitzer des physischen Exemplars. Wenn Sie ein Gemälde z.B. von Pablo Picasso käuflich erwerben, dann gehört Ihnen nur dieses physische Exemplar; sie dürfen davon aber keine Vervielfältigung (z.B. Foto) erstellen und öffentlich verbreiten. Dies würde die ausdrückliche Genehmigung von Picasso erfordern. Das gilt analog für die o.g. Urkunden.
D.h., die beiden Fotos unterliegen 2 unterschiedlichen Urheberrechten, dem des Schöpfers des Originals und dem des Fotografen.
Wenn Sie die Fotos selbst aufgenommmen haben, haben Sie Ihre Genehmigung mit dem Hochladen unter einer freien Lizenz bereits erteilt.
Dann fehlt aber noch die erwähnte Genehmigung des Original-Urhebers. Sie müssen also zunächst herausfinden, wer das Original entworfen bzw. gemalt/gezeichnet hat. Diese Person sollte außerdem als Urheber genannt werden. Es kann sein, dass die preisverleihende Institution umfängliche Nutzungsrechte (copyright) vom Original-Urheber erworben hat oder dass dieser für die Institution arbeitet. In diesem Fall könnte auch die preisverleihende Institution eine solche Lizenz ausstellen. Diese müsste an das Supportteam (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org) gemailt werden. Dabei ist zu beachten, dass eine "Genehmigung für Wikipedia" nicht ausreicht, obwohl Sie das Foto nur dafür verwenden möchten, sondern dass eine generelle freie Lizenz (z.B. wie die von Ihnen gewählte) erteilt wird. --Túrelio (talk) 19:10, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Das Original ist von den beiden Instutionen entworfen und sie haben die copyright rechte an beiden Dokumenten. An welche Adresse soll die Email gehen? پژوهشگر تجربی (talk) 19:18, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

An das Supportteam (s.o.). Wir haben sogar eine Emailvorlage auf Persisch Commons:الگوهای ایمیل; vielleicht vereinfacht das den Vorgang. Ich weiß nicht genau was in der Pers. Vorlage steht. Ggf. müssen Sie den Text vorher ein wenig anpassen, in dem Sinne, dass die rechteinhabende Institution, die Genehmigung erteilt, Ihre fotographischen Abbildungen der Urkunden unter der gewählten freien Lizenz (Lizenz genau angeben, also z.B. CC-BY-SA 4.0) zu verbreiten. D.h., die Institution braucht nicht die Original-Urkunde selbst unter einer freien Lizenz freizugeben, sondern nur die von Ihnen erstellten Abbilder davon. --Túrelio (talk) 20:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

A favour?Edit

Hi. I know that as an admin you are quite busy (I know because I contribute to it :) but would you still do me a favour? There are hundreds of football players (all men) in Category:Association football players from Turkey whom I need to take to Category:Men's association football players from Turkey, as I am tired of doing this one by one since weeks now. Please do not teach me a method which may look simple to you but I will probably not understand or be able to apply. I had the same difficulty with Category:Politicians of Turkey and Category:Male politicians of Turkey. Sometimes I ask myself: Who asked you to make "male cats" so that women will not look like a "subcat" of men? In the end they were made of men's ribs... :) Really, if you have a magic stick just touch the problem with it. Thanks a lot. --E4024 (talk) 20:46, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Uh oh. I am not the right person when it's about bots or bot-like operations. You might ask User:Fæ, who has very much knowledge and experience in this area. --Túrelio (talk) 21:21, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
I hope s/he reads your page. :) Thanks anyway, you always help everyone. --E4024 (talk) 21:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) @E4024:   Done with Cat-a-lot and some help re the women.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 21:40, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Bitte um HilfeEdit

Kannst du bitte auf Commons:Deletion requests/File:Boersianer-Ingrid-08.jpg schauen, der LA schaut mir sehr komisch aus - danke -- K@rl (talk) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 20:54, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Nun ja, der LA-Steller hat schon irgendwo die richtige Nase. Die Uploads von Chieft1308, der vorher wohl unter anderem Namen firmierte, wirken insofern "verdächtig", dass sie mit mindestens 3 Kameramodellen verschiedener Hersteller aufgenommen wurden. Da ich allerdings stark vermute, dass er selbst bei/für die Zeitschrift Börsianer schreibt, dürfte er Journalist sein und kann ggf. auf einen Kamerapool zurückgreifen. Du könntest ihm einfach eine Email schicken (ist auf Benutzerseite verfügbar) und mal etwas vortasten, ohne ihm direkt etwas vorzuwerfen. In einem geschützten Rahmen fällt es ggf. leichter ehrlich zu antworten, falls es tatsächlich nicht seine eigenen Fotos sein sollten. --Túrelio (talk) 21:19, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Shirley Ze Yu PhotoEdit

Hello, regarding the photo you declined for Shirley Ze Yu where you said it is taken down because it was in ChinabigIdea's page on Facebook. But what I want to say the ChinabigIdea is own by Shirley Ze Yu, and that's why I got the image. In my personal thinking, if you take a photo of the person from his/her website or social media platform will be not considered as copyright because that person is the one that own it. Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 21:58, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi Abbas Kwarbai,
I don't know to which image/file you are relating to, as you have/had no uploads so far. --Túrelio (talk) 09:32, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Митрополит Ростислав (Гонт), Санкт-Петербург.jpgEdit

This image (File:Митрополит Ростислав принял участие в торжественном Акте в честь нового учебного года в СПбДА.jpg) have the same source with the deleted image. Moreover, these images have a common author and are located in one album. And that image was defined as free. In addition, all labels on the pages of both images are the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RC-1841 (talk • contribs)

Yes, but despite of that, it has been licensed differently BY-ND[11], which is incompatible with Commons policy COM:L. --Túrelio (talk) 09:14, 27 September 2020 (UTC)


I'm sorry I didn't see this. I will try to be more vigilant in the future RC-1841 (talk) 11:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Wegkarte - Mecklenburger Kapellenweg.pdfEdit

Hi, what about File:Logo Mecklenburger Kapellenweg.jpg which is a part from the same publication? --He3nry (talk) 14:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Category:Objects by provenience in the Metropolitan Museum of ArtEdit

Hi, your given cause for deltion was: "test page, accidental creation, or page containing nonsense or no valid content". So. I created this page in 2017. It was not an "accident". There was no "nonsense". The content was "valid". May the times are changing and the way how things becoming sorted are changing. This is OK then. But why, please explain me, why, you give such an defamatory and offensive cause for the deletion? Really, I don't think, my work deserve this. -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 20:13, 27 September 2020 (UTC) PS: gerne auch noch auf deutsch: Du hast das mit der Angabe eines ungemein beleidigenden Grundes gelöscht. Ich verstehe und akzeptiere, wenn sich manche Dinge verändert und man anders sortiert. Alles OK. Aber diese Kategorie war kein Unfall. Sie war kein Unsinn. Der dort gesammelte Inhalt war absolut valide. Warum löschst du also mit einer so ehrabschneidenden, beleidigenden Begründung? Wirklich, ich raffe es nicht.

Hi,
du meine Güte. Man kann auch etwas überempfindlich sein. 1) nicht ich habe die Kategorie zur Löschung markiert, sondern User:Ruff tuff cream puff. Die gewählte Löschrationale wird dabei automatisch in die edit-summary übertragen. Da ich heute zig leere Kategorien gelöscht habe, genau aus dem Grund, dass sie leer waren (CSD C2), ändere ich nicht jedesmal manuell die edit-summary. 2) Der hier vom SLA-Steller benutzte Löschgrund "CSD G1" ist einer der ganz offiziellen Criteria for speedy deletion. Da die Kat. leer war, hatte sie zumindest jetzt "no valid content", nämlich gar keinen. Das nun als "ungemein beleidigend" und "ehrabschneidend" zu etikettieren, dazu fällt mir nichts mehr ein. Anyway, ich habe den SLA-Steller aufgefordert, für solche Fälle in Zukunft CSD C2 statt CSD G1 zu nehmen.--Túrelio (talk) 21:41, 27 September 2020 (UTC)