User talk:Túrelio/Archive15

Talkpage archive from 2020

Accidental overwrite with the uploadwizard

Can you delete the old version of File:Павел Игнатьевич Муравьёв.jpg please? IDK why the upload wizard didn't give an overwrite warning, but it happened and now those two photos are on the page. I want just the current one to be there since it correlates to the current description+infobox there. Thanks.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 22:18, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 22:24, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Apology

Hi, I have posted photos of Wikipedia characters on their topic on pages. It is true that I took these pictures on the Internet, and did not notice that the copyright formula was modified. Please accept my apologies and image manipulation for use on Wikipedia. My love --Kamel saleh (talk) 12:24, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi Kamel saleh,

you do not need to apologize, as you did not insult or violate me. But, before uploading further files to Commons, you should study Commons:Licensing and upload only ony images that are either truely your own work or have been released under a free license by its creator. --Túrelio (talk) 14:37, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

هذه الصور في معظمها لأشخاص ماتوا منذ فترة في لبنان، وهي صور مشاعة ومستخدمة لهم في الانترنت مجانا. كل ما في الموضوع، انني أردت جعل الموضوع المنشور عنهمذفي ويكيبيديا أجمل وأكثر جاذبية، وفي الحقيقة فوجئت بالتعاطي معي على هذا النحو وحذف الصور التي بذلت جهدا لرفعها وتحريرها ونشرها لخدمة مشروع ويكيبيديا . أنتم ماهرون بقتل كل حماس في الأشخاص الراغبين في العمل مجانا بمشروع المؤسسة الإنساني والثقافي الكبير. علما انني صدقا لم أنتبه لطلبكم ولرسائلكم من قبل،على العكس كنت أنتظر الشكر والاشادة بمجهودي والوقت الذي أبذله هنا بهدف نشر المعرفة المجانية Kamel saleh (talk) 17:25, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

اعتذار

اعتذر لم انتبه الى طلباتكم ولم اتعمد ذلك. الرجاء مساعدتي في معالجة الصور لانها ترتبط بموضوعات الصفحات. اكرر اعتذاري Kamel saleh (talk) 14:21, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

ماهرون بقتل كل حماس

هذه الصور التي سارعتم بحذفها، هي في معظمها لأشخاص ماتوا منذ فترة في لبنان، وهي صور مشاعة ومستخدمة لهم في الانترنت مجانا. كل ما في الموضوع، انني أردت جعل الموضوع المنشور عنهم في ويكيبيديا أجمل وأكثر جاذبية، وفي الحقيقة فوجئت بالتعاطي معي على هذا النحو وحذف الصور التي بذلت جهدا لرفعها وتحريرها ونشرها لخدمة مشروع ويكيبيديا . أنتم ماهرون بقتل كل حماس في الأشخاص الراغبين في العمل مجانا بمشروع المؤسسة الإنساني والثقافي الكبير. علما انني صدقا لم أنتبه لطلبكم ولرسائلكم من قبل، على العكس كنت أنتظر الشكر والاشادة بمجهودي والوقت الذي أبذله هنا بهدف نشر المعرفة المجانية Kamel saleh (talk) 17:30, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

my profile

Why can't I recreate my profile? --Kamel saleh (talk) 16:24, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

What do you mean by "my profile", your userpage User:Kamel saleh or a page on Wikipedia about you? First you need to understand that Wikimedia-Commons and Wikipedia is not like Facebook or alike. The purpose of a userpage on Commons (and on Wikipedia) is not to present your real-life/business identity. Users, who contribute to Wikipedia or Commons, may use their userpage to provide their fellow users with relevant information about their language-capabilities, their thematic interest, their uploads, etc. Another thing is an encyclopedic/biographic article about you on Wikipedia. This is only allowed if you are a notable person, according to Wikipedia's criteria (en:Wikipedia:Notability). --Túrelio (talk) 17:24, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

I mean userpage User:Kamel saleh? --Kamel saleh (talk) 17:59, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Ok. Then see my above advises. --Túrelio (talk) 10:21, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Ok thank you, but I mean this alert. You have set it on "Users": (This page has been deleted. The deletion, protection, and move log for the page are provided below for reference. 11:48, 3 January 2020 Túrelio talk contribs deleted page User:Kamel saleh (CSD U3 (inappropriate use of user pages)) (thank))

--Kamel saleh (talk) 12:14, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

No, I did not set it on anything. Anyway, I've recreated it with just one . --Túrelio (talk) 12:21, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Temporary undelete then redelete request

Can you please undelete the following files (for less than 24 hours) so I can add important information (earlier publication dates and typos in categorization) to their file descriptions? Thank you, sorry to bother you with this again. I will certainly take care of them within 24 hours (well below the 7-day maximum).

• File:Svetlana Savitskaya portrait, 1982.jpg and File:Светлана Евгеньевна Савицкая, 1982 год.jpg - one of them is from Газета «Правда» 10 августа 1982 года, not sure which one
• File:Волков Владислав Николаевич 1969.jpg - Газета «Ленинградская правда» 14 октября 1969 года
• File:Елисеев Алексей Станиславович, 1969.jpg - Газета «Ленинградская правда» 14 октября 1969 года
• File:Горбатко Виктор Васильевич, 1969.jpg - Газета «Ленинградская правда» 14 октября 1969 года
• File:Филипченко Анатолия Васильевич, 1969.jpg - Газета «Ленинградская правда» 14 октября 1969 года
• File:Шаталов Владимир Александрович 1969.jpg - Газета «Ленинградская правда» 14 октября 1969 года
• File:Шонин Георгий Степанович, 1969.jpg - Газета «Красноярский рабочий» 14 октября 1969 года
• File:Cosmonaut Valery Fyodorovich Bykovsky 1978.jpg - Газета «Комсомольская правда» 27 августа 1978 года
• File:Aleksandr Aleksandrovich Volkov, 1988.jpg - Газета «Труд» 27 ноября 1988 года

(I also need to fix the spelling of the name of the photographer, Valentin Cheredintsev)

Sorry about the problems here. Trying to straighten things out. --PlanespotterA320 (talk) 02:23, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Ok.  Done. I have removed your speedy-tag from each file in order to give you enough time before eventually another colleague of mine would delete them again. Drop me a note when they can be re-deleted. --Túrelio (talk) 07:31, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Done. Added early publication information to each one, translated descriptions, and fixed categorization, ready for re-deletion. Sorry for all the trouble!--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:46, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

This DR

Dear Turelio,

When you can, please close this DR as keep. I have withdrawn my nomination here. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:24, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

• Thank You Turelio for your help. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:08, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

the photo of Krzysztof Stanowski.

Dear Turelio, I would like to clarify the situation regarding the photo of Krzysztof Stanowski. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Krzysztof_Stanowski_2008.jpg

The author of this photo is Anna Kertyczak as you can see on the webpage you mentioned. I submitted a copy of a letter of confirmation from her (in Polish) on address permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Looking forward to hearing from you. Best regards Wandea — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wandea (talk • contribs)

Hi Wandea,

ok. If you had written that more clearly into the description, it might not have been deleted. Anyway, it can easily be undeleted if the permission is validated by our OTRS-volunteers. They will notify you, though it may take some time, as they are rather overworked. --Túrelio (talk) 21:07, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Sergio Miranda (photographer) duplicates

Hi Túrelio, I apologize for the work I am giving, but the "flickr2commons" did not detect the duplicates because the files were from different sources and had different names, although they were exactly the same. Thank you --JotaCartas (talk) 10:57, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

No problem. We had already larger numbers of files to dupe-provcess for the same reason. The developers still have work to do with that script. --Túrelio (talk) 11:06, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Please restore Category:White Sands National Monument

There are still many projects and external links linking to the old name, that was valid until dec 16, 2019. Your must really be in a hurry if you delete redirects that fast. Take your time, redirects do not hurt, they are useful. Happy new year --h-stt !? 15:40, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

So schnell war das nicht. Die Kat. war speedy-markiert und kein erkennbarer redir. Anyway, habs erstmal wieder hergestellt. --Túrelio (talk) 17:42, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

File:LPL 2018-11-21 (Erminig, NCO).png

Bonjour,

merci de restaurer cette image. Comme indiqué dans le lien que vous utilisez pour justifier de la suppression, il s'agit d'un tweet qui utilise des images de Wikicommons (dans les commentaires de ce tweet, les crédits d'auteurs sont d'ailleurs indiqués). Il ne s'agit donc pas d'une violation de droits d'auteurs.

Cordialement. Lepsyleon (talk) 10:53, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 10:59, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Merci ! Cordialement. Lepsyleon (talk) 11:06, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Lamentation for Christ exact duplicate?

Hi Túrelio, it's easy to see that the colors of [1] and [2] are different. Why did you delete the first file as an exact duplicate if it's not an exact duplicate? Please undo the deletion of File:Lamentation for Christ.jpg a be a bit more careful with art in the future. Thank you, Multichill (talk) 18:20, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:04, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Page Wikipedia: Pierrette Bloch

Hello,

Could you explain to me the reason for the removal of the photographic portrait on Pierrette Bloch's Wikipedia page? I don't understand the reason, being the author of this portrait. Thank you for your answer. Regards,

Infini Turbulent — Preceding unsigned comment added by Infini turbulent (talk • contribs) 12:19, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

the EXIF data for this image cotain the statement "©james Caritey", whereas you claimed it as own work. In case you are James Caritey and are really the original photographer, you should send a confirmation (see Commons:Email_templates#Email_message_template_for_release_of_rights_to_a_file) from your official email address to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). Emails to OTRS are treated confidentially. You are not forced to publicly disclose your identity and OTRS will not do so. However, we must be sure that you are the photographer or rightsholder. --Túrelio (talk) 14:16, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Schnelllöschung aller Dateien von User:Klagenfurter Dancer

Du hast heute alle Dateien von User:Klagenfurter Dancer schnellgelöscht. Das war aber definitiv kein Fall für eine Schnelllöschung, wie hier begründet wurde. Es ist die offizielle Flickr-Seite von de:Die Grünen Kärnten. Der Fotograf war in der Partei involviert und hat auch eine eigene Flickr-Seite (auf der er die Bilder allerdings nicht hochgeladen hat. Die Flickr-Seite der Grünen Kärnten lädt manche Bilder mit "Alle Rechte vorbehalten" hoch. Für diese Bilder gelten die in der Löschbegründung genannten Vorgaben sicherlich. Die gelöschten Bilder wurden aber ausnahmslos mit CC-Lizenzen hochgeladen. Man kann davon ausgehen, dass der Landesverband einer professionellen politischen Partei das nicht versehentlich so macht. Es gibt bei Wikimedia Commons bereits zahlreiche Bilder von derselben Flickr-Seite der Grünen aus Kärnten mit CC-Lizenz, die nach Jahren bis heute nie beanstandet wurden. --2003:C3:4F46:F944:1CD5:51B6:576A:79B9 12:35, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Hallo IP,

dass etwas bisher nicht aufgefallen ist, gilt schon auf der Wikipedia nicht als Entschuldigung. In letzter Zeit sind halt öfter gleichartige Probleme mit Flickrkonten von Institutionen aufgefallen. Diejenigen, die hier schon etwas länger aktiv sind, wissen aus Erfahrung, dass man Lizenzen auch von Institutionen, die ja oft nicht selbst der Urheber sind, immer mit einer Prise Salz nehmen muss. Wenn der Flickrkonto-Inhaber als behaupteter Bildrechteinhaber die von WvB angesprochenen Widersprüche zufriedenstellend aufklärt, können die gelöschten Bilder problemlos wiederhergestellt werden. --Túrelio (talk) 14:30, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Turelio, ich habe diese Fotos ebenfalls beobachtet und keine so eindeutige URV gesehen, da diese Fotos bei Flickr mit CC und eben der anderen Lizenz doppelt lizenziert wurde. Auch ich habe früher schon Fotos von denen hochgeladen, die sehrwohl mit wechselnder Lizenz hochladen also schon wissen worum es geht. Deshalb verstehe ich die Schnellöschung ebenfalls nicht wirklich. -- gruß K@rl (talk) 16:33, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

@K@rl, wie ich oben schon schrieb ist in letzter Zeit das eine oder andere institutionelle Flickr-Konto durch gewisse Ungereimtheiten der Lizenzierung aufgefallen. Ich habe kein Problem damit, die Bilder temporär zu entlöschen, müsste sie dann aber sofort in einen LA stecken, denn die Angelegenheit muss doch ordentlich (d.h. Erklärung des Lizenzgebers gegenüber OTRS) geklärt werden. --Túrelio (talk) 18:01, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Zudem lässt sich mit Web-Archiv feststellen, dass es diesen Infotext im Januar 2017 noch gar nicht gab Somit stellt sich also die Frage: Kann ein Flickr-Accountinhaber durch die Erstellung eines Infoseiten-Textes nach der Veröffentlichung mit CC-Lizenz diese CC-Lizenz zurücknehmen? Ich würde sagen: Nein. Und alle hochgeladenen CC-Bilder stammen aus Zeiträumen zwischen 2013 und 2014. --2003:C3:4F46:F944:1CD5:51B6:576A:79B9 17:30, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

@IP, das spielt keine Rolle, denn zum Zeitpunkt des Kopierens nach Commons war der Hinweis offensichtlich vorhanden. Es geht darum, die Nachnutzer der auf Commons gehosteten Medien vor URV/Schadenersatzforderungen zu schützen. Übrigens: Falls du User:Klagenfurter Dancer bist, warum logst du dich nicht ein? --Túrelio (talk) 18:01, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

auch das ist nicht bewiesen, denn wer sagt, dass er es über Flickr2commons verschoben hat. Ich habe als Anfänger auch Fotos lokal gespeichert und dann irgendwann hochgeladen. wenn es korrekt geht, fällt das niemanden auf. --K@rl (talk) 18:22, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Loudoun County Sheriff's Office Picture Removal

Túrelio,

I uploaded File:Lound County Sheriff Star.png and File:Loudoun County Sheriff Patch.png and specified that I got them from the internet and thought they were copyright free. I obtained them from the Loudoun County government website and thus should be copyright free. If there is some way I should indicate this in the future please let me know. Can you also undelete them?

Thanks, --Phoenix1494 (talk) 14:33, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi Phoenix1494,

yes, I had read the description of the file. But there is no convincing evidence, why "should be copyright free". The cited website doesn't mention copyright; at least, I didn't find it. Do you have any other evidence? --Túrelio (talk) 14:41, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

regarding photo violation of actress ramya pandian

hi how can i know that i have done the photo violation?. i just downloaded a pic from website and uploaded it in the wikipedia (draft page) which i have created. i didn't have any problem while downloaading, so i just uploaded that pic for my draft page. plz explain what is the violation here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shankraj914 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 13 January 2020‎ (UTC)

• @Shankraj914: As it is stated multiple times on your talk page: "Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing." --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!^{Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS).} 05:12, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Wiki commons

Good day,

I am Afrikaans (South African) and I really struggle and find it very hard to understand the rules of Wiki Commons. I just want to explain where all my pictures comes from and that I didn't think I was doing something wrong: Pictures from source Wêreldspektrum and Kennis: The series of these books was published in the early 80's. The publishing house does not exist anymore. Therefore I have proof of a discussion with lawyers that stated that when there is no person alive anymore to benefit from the books and because the source is so old that the knowledge in the books becomes public domain. I've been accused of plagiarism because I put the words down exactly like it stands in the books. That is not what plagiarism is, because I do not use the words as if it is my own and I have legal proof that I'm also not doing anything wrong with copyrights. Please can you reverse all the pictures that you took out of my articles? An article without a picture is not nice.

South African Artists I received photos from the managers of several music groups and individual artists. I stated with the uploading process who the photographer is. They granted the photos to me to make a contribution to Wiki Commons. I do not know of any other way that I can upload the photos without getting into trouble. I have the permission of the photographers.

Pixabay photos:

Pixabay is 'n source of free images that can be used freely in any article or publishing. Journalists use it in magazines, I use it for a free platform to help build knowledge. What did I do wrong?

Please help me! I see that I got a final warning and it really doesn't feel good. I'm having a panic attack because of things I thought I was doing by the book.

Please get back to me in this regard.

Kind regardsElana Barker (talk) 08:43, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi Elena Barker,

did you read what I had replied to your post on Monday? (see below)

Your uploads have been tagged and deleted by different users/admins. But you find the immediate reason for the deletion mentioned in the copyvio-notices on your talkpage. The problem with PixaBay is explained here. --Túrelio (talk) 09:23, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Copyright

Good day

All the photos that I uploaded was given to me by the managers of the artists that I did articles on. I do not wish to be blocked because I really want to make a contribution to Afrikaans. I just struggle to understand the copyright dilemma. If I get permission to upload the photos, and I give credit to the photographers, how am I doing something wrong? Please help me!Elana Barker (talk) 11:10, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

"give credit to the photographers" - well, you wrote always "own work", that is not giving credit.

If a photo is shot, the copyright is with the photographer, not with the person photographed or the person who asked for the photo. Of course, the photographer may transfer his copyright (though not his authorship) to another person.

In order to protect our re-users from litigation, we require in such cases (not own work) a permission, which needs to be send from the legal rightsholder to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). The OTRS volunteers behind that address will the evaluate the permission and either reject or accept it. Please, read Commons:OTRS#If_you_are_NOT_the_copyright_holder and see Commons:OTRS#Email_message_template_for_release_of_rights_to_a_file for a permission-template. Remember, copyright is legal stuff, nothing to game. The people, from whom you obtained the images, need to be totally sure that they really have obtained/acquired the copyright from the photographer. Otherwiese, they cannot issue a permission under a free license, which allows anybody to use these image for free, as requried by our licensing policy. --Túrelio (talk) 11:25, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Upload DSF39084.jpg

I'm the owner of Green Life and I granted Wikipedia the rights for the foto I just uploaded, so there is no copyright violation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VFSGreenLife (talk • contribs)

Hi, there are several issues with this image: 1) you didn't add a license (template). 2) If you really intended to "grant (only) Wikipedia" a permission, that is not possible. All uploads to Commons need to be free for any use, see COM:L. The recommended license is the CC-BY-SA 4.0 [3]. 3) As Yorick Carroux is credited as the author, you need her/his permission for releasing this image under a free license.

So, if you are prepared (and entitled) to release this image under a free license, you should copy the boxed text in Commons:Email_templates#Email_message_template_for_release_of_rights_to_a_file, enter the filename of the image, date and sign it and email it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 09:43, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

File:IMG 0690.jpg

File:IMG 0690.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Smiley.toerist (talk) 21:37, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Message on talk page

Hi, I left you a reply to a message you left on my talk page but I don’t think you saw it. I uploaded a photo of Joanna Cherry, which had as its caption that it was licensed under CC-BY 3.0. The Flickr page also said it had a CC-BY-NC 2.1, and I think you just saw that and deleted it. I think it is in fact dual-licensed, and so shouldn’t have been deleted. Would you consider undeleting? YorkshireLad (talk) 11:49, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Ok. I've restored it. But it will need a manual license-review, as our FlickrReview-bot sees only the incompatible license. --Túrelio (talk) 11:54, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Sure, thank you very much! How do I get it manually reviewed? YorkshireLad (talk) 17:54, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Just ask another admin or License-reviewer to do it. --Túrelio (talk) 20:20, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

File:IMG 0690.jpg

File:IMG 0690.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Smiley.toerist (talk) 21:37, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Wikimedia Pictures

Hello You have sent me messages when i uploaded some pictures. These pictures I have received from the artist himself, who is 90 years old ;-) What is the best way to prove I have received permission from him? I want to use these photos for an article around Smoke art in Wikipedia. Kind regards, Claude — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clayreon (talk • contribs)

Hi Clayreon,

I had posted already an instruction on your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 10:02, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Transfer to Commons

Hi Túrelio. Could the following images be transferred to Commons? And if possible, could you do it? Thank you.--Xabier (talk) 21:07, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hplovecraft-azathoth-manuscript.jpg
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hplovecraft-manuscript-thedreamsinthewitchhouse.jpg
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hplovecraft-manuscript-thecaseofcharlesdexterward.jpg
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hplovecraft-thebeastinthecave-manuscript.jpg

Hi Xabier,

I'll look into it on saturday. --Túrelio (talk) 22:54, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Thank you anyway. Another user has already transferred them.--Xabier (talk) 17:14, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

• File:Hplovecraft-thebeastinthecave-manuscript.jpg
• File:Hplovecraft-manuscript-thedreamsinthewitchhouse.jpg
• File:Hplovecraft-azathoth-manuscript.jpg
• File:Hplovecraft-manuscript-thecaseofcharlesdexterward.jpg

That was me. --Túrelio (talk) 17:21, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

One was missing here. Can you transfer it to Commons? Thank you (veo que hablas español, era ver si podías transferir esta imagen también. Estamos trabajando en el artículo de Lovecraft en español para proponerlo a artículo bueno).--Xabier (talk) 15:48, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hplovecraft-manuscript-thedreamquestofunknownkadath.jpg

Image blocked

HI Turelio,

I just received a message in which you tell me that the image i uploaded violates copyrights, but you refer to our website with.

How can i make sure that we can use this image on our wikipedia page, as this is our own image?

Hope to hear from you soon.

KR Niels (employee of ANP) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nbersma (talk • contribs) 11:00, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi KR Niels,

with such kind of images we require a formal permission from the author/photographer or rightsholder. Assuming that you psted this image not as a private person, but in some of your job function, you need to prepare a permission email by copying the boxed text in Commons:E-mailsjablonen, entering the filename and the name of the choosen license, and mail the composite text to the legal department of ANP (or whoever there is responsible for issuing permissions). They need to date and sign it and send it back to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org or permissions-nl@wikimedia.org (OTRS). The content of your mail will not be published and can only be accessed by our OTRS-volunteers, who evaluate the permission and then issue a so-called OTRS-ticket (confirmation). The latter can be applied, even in case the image would have been deleted in between. The OTRS process may take a while. --Túrelio (talk) 11:29, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

WEF images

You have deleted some images which I did upload, see User talk:Behanzane. Off course they have an unfree licence, but for that reason they were tagged with the {{WEF|cc-by-sa-2.0}} template, see Commons:Free_media_resources/Photography#People, so there is a permission to use this images here. Behanzane (talk) 11:24, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

No, they weren't any more. Anyway, I've restored them and tagged OTRS-pending. --Túrelio (talk) 11:31, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

A strange state of affairs, a user deletes the template without giving a reason and then within a minute Flickreviewr gives the status failed. Behanzane (talk) 11:59, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

The 1st step should indeed have been discussed on a notice-board or talkpage. The 2nd step is performed by bot. --Túrelio (talk) 12:01, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

The first editor did indeed go to the OTRS-board; see Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Template:WEF, but the response is insufficient, IMO. --Túrelio (talk) 12:03, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

File:شعار مجلة الحداثة.jpg ؟

مرحبا لقد فوجئت بحذف صورة

File:شعار مجلة الحداثة.jpg

من صفحة المجلة مجلة الحداثة ، وقد أثبت لكم سابقًا من خلال رابطين من موقع المجلة وصفحتها العامة على الفايسبوك، أن المجلة تسمح بنشر شعارها مجانًا، ولا تمانع في ذلك. لذا، الرجاء اعادة النظر في الموضوع، والسماح بنشر شعار المجلة مجددا في صفحتها في ويكيبيديا. ويمكنكم التأكد مباشرة من ذلك عبر هذين الرابطين:

https://alhadathamagazine.blogspot.com/

وهذا الرابط الذي يذكر صراحة السماح بنشر الصور مجانا:

https://alhadathamagazine.blogspot.com/p/blog-page_11.html

وشكر لكم. --Kamel saleh (talk) 14:13, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I have temporarily restored the file. But, as I don't read Arabic, I can't really review the permission. Please ask one of my Arabic-speading colleagues, User:Dyolf77 or User:Tarawneh, to review the permission at the source. --Túrelio (talk) 14:39, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Orca Photos

Hello, I am uploading the photos from Flickr that have identified that the correct licence is applied. HamOnt (talk) 16:31, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

I've replied on your talkpage already. --Túrelio (talk) 16:33, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Ram.jpg.jpg

Looking at this users contributions, I think this constitutes "no constructive global contributions". If I knew the process at hi.wiki, I would nominate their user page as hi:वि:सामाजिकनेटवर्क (NOTWEBHOST). If I am mistaken, please explain so I can understand where I errored. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 13:13, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi Coffeeandcrumbs,

I did not change/revert, because you would have made an error. But many of these cases are borderline resp. sort of judgment call. If such kind of user uploads more than 1 image of him/herself, I would likely delete immediately. If it's just 1 image AND is placed on his userpage, both decisions are legitimate, IMO. --Túrelio (talk) 14:04, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Understood, I figured out how to CSD the user page on hi.wiki. Would you agree if the local admins there agree that it is not an appropriate user page for their project, the file should be deleted? I will wait on their call and get back to you. I appreciate your explanation and will keep that in mind in the future. Indeed, it is worth considering the balance between not allowing images out of scope and prematurely biting new comers to Wikimedia projects. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 14:14, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Sure. But it's unnecessary, as the image has already been deleted by an admin colleague. You see, we are a diverse bunch :-) . --Túrelio (talk) 16:29, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Jochen A. Werner

• de:Jochen A. Werner

Just leaving a note since I remember you speak German. But someone may want to check this for appropriateness. It seems likely to be spam/promotional. GMG^talk 15:26, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

File:«Хәрри Поттер мен пәлсапа тас» кітабының мұқабасы.jpg

Hello, today you deleted the file that I uploaded, indicating the reason that the photo infringes copyrights, but this is the cover of the Kazakh translation of this book, and all copyrights are protected and indicated on the cover (please take a look, everything is written there). Мұхамеджан Амангелді (talk) 18:12, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi Мұхамеджан Амангелді,

per our policy COM:L all uploads to Commons need to be under a free license, that allows any kind of use. Only the creator or rights-holder can release a still copyrighted work under a free license. One does not obtain such a free license by simply mentioning "the copyright belongs to xyz". Your image shows a book-cover containing creative artwork, which is surely copyrighted either by the Kazakh publisher or by Mrs. Rowlings publishing company or by the artist who created this drawing. --Túrelio (talk) 19:54, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Bild gelöscht, Bitte um Wiederherstellung

Es geht um File:Logo from Beatles Ludwig drumset, Museum of Making Music.png. Dort ist eine Weiterleitung auf […]

Wau, Du warst schneller. Vielen Dank. -- Pemu (talk) 20:47, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for informing

Hi, @Túrelio: thanks for informing. I will keep that in mind before uploading such rights reserved image of Flickr in Commons. ¶@N$¥¶IT@^t@lk 21:36, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Category:Mircea Ciobanu

The copyright holder no longer agrees with the release of Mircea Ciobanu's images on wikipedia. Please delete everything from here. Asybaris01 (talk) 19:48, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Malligai C. Kumar.jpg

I've just left a message with user:Patrick Rogel, why I think that this is not a copyright violation. Within seconds you deleted the image. Thank you. I copied this image from this website. this was a video file created in December 2018 and has cc_by_sa rights. The one you mentioned is from a newspaper published on 30/1/2020. I uploaded the file here on 29/1/2020.--Kanags (talk) 08:25, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

O.k. Seems you are right. Restored and license-review-template added. --Túrelio (talk) 08:30, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks:)--Kanags (talk) 09:27, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Picture

Hi Túrelio, the picture of Yurdanur Steck is our picture and we do not violate any copyrights. What am I suppose to do? --Sibel Steck (talk) 13:34, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi Sibel Steck,

please do what I explained on your talkpage User talk:Sibel Steck. --Túrelio (talk) 14:49, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Category:Demographic_maps_of_Australia

Demographic maps of Australia has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Mike Peel (talk) 17:42, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Delete photo

Dear Turelio, I want to delete this photo: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anastasiya_Kochetkova.jpg Please advise, how we can do this? The person who is in the photo wants to remove this photo from the wikimedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bokhan.evgeniy (talk • contribs) 21:29, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi Bokhan.evgeniy,

I had to convert the speedy-request to a regular deletion-request, as an image, uploaded in 2011, does not qualify for the speedy-process. So, this was not done to oppose your deletion-wish. I understand that its not a good shot of Mrs. Kochetkova. However, it is still available at the source-site, from where it was uploaded to Commons. So, Mrs. Kochetkova should also try to remove it from the original source. In addition, you might recommend her to file a deletion-request directly to our support-team (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). --Túrelio (talk) 07:32, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Deletion due to presumed copyright violation

Dear Turelio,

Greetings from Stockholm. You have removed a photo from https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Lundgren_(konstn%C3%A4r)

I am the copyright holder of this photo, and I am also the owner of the original painting. I am an art collector, among other things, and consider it important that artist biographies are illustrated with examples of the artist's artwork.

If you are not convinced that I am the owner of the Lundgren painting, please visit Stockholm and have a look at the original in my house.

Kind regards. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.20.110.238 (talk) 10:48, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

PS. You write: Copyright violation: The artist behind this drawing, Eric Lundgren, died in 2001. The uploader states this to be his own work, which is impossible. This is therefor copyright infringement and the image must be deleted.

Why is it impossible to state that an uploader owns a work of art? Again, I own this painting and have the right to upload my photograph of this painting.

Hi Unknown,

as you didn't log-in and didn't specify the file-name, I have no idea about which image you are talking. Please either give the filename or your username.

What I can say already is, 1) the above cited deletion rationale is not by me, but by the user, who tagged this image for speedy deletion. However, I accpted this rationale. 2) Mere ownership of an copyrighted artwork, does not automatically include the copyright for that artwork. --Túrelio (talk) 13:35, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

If you are User:Uvesvensson, see my comments on your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 14:41, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

About "Holy Devin"

Greetings, Túrelio!

My apologies for any inconvenience, but I think there must have been some kind of misunderstanding. Maybe I didn't tag the picture properly.

Anyway, here's the deal. I've actually used this image as basis for my own, and there the license is CC BY-SA 2.5, which states that I can remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. I placed an URL to Flickr because I thought I shouldn't post URLs to other Wikipedia-related sites. I would greatly appreciate it if you could bring the picture back. If it's not possible, that's okay, just let me know.

Thank you in advance. --PajoPajimir (talk) 20:43, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Ok. Yes, the source-entry to Flickr was misleading, as the image is "All rights reserved" on Flickr, and had automatically been tagged as copyvio. I've corrected the source-entry now. As you likely didn't draw the white wings by yourself, you also need to add the source for that part of the image. --Túrelio (talk) 07:30, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! Yeah, that's more than apparent given that I'm still a newbie when it comes to Photoshop. Anyway, the source for the wings is this. Now, I'm not sure what the procedure is with royalty-free stock images. I've found it in this state, without a watermark, so I'm a bit confused. Again, if it inadvertently infringes on copyright, feel free to delete it. --PajoPajimir (talk) 17:14, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

ok. Though I wasn't able to really find your wings image at istockphoto.com, it's rather clear that you cannot use istock images for an image licensed as freely as Commons requires. The term en:Royalty-free is often misunderstood. So, if you want/need an image as File:HolyDevin.jpg, you have to search for fitting wings that are really under a free license. You might look for that here on Commons or on Flickr (only CC-BY and CC-BY-SA!). --Túrelio (talk) 19:14, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

About Chainsaw Man image

The article in wikipedia spanish "Chainsaw Man" is a translation of its english wikipedia, the problem is that to use an image on spanish wikia first i have to upload it to Commons, unfortunately i have no info about its licenses of use, when i checked the image that appear on the english article it appeared that the file i uploaded in commons was a Duplication, reason why i decided to tag it with Duplication plus no license info, because of that i ask to delete it from commons. Therefore i have a question, i want to use an image to illustrate the article in spanish wikia, but i dont know about it licences, is it possible to upload a fan art? an image not created by the author but by myself, wich of course won't be nor traced nor a copy from an artwork already in existence, in wich i want to illustrate main character, without giving any self-publicity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brvf (talk • contribs) 03:49, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi Brvf,

Commons allows only uploads that are verifiably under a free license, that allows nearly any kind of use (including commercial), see COM:L. Images shown in :en Wikipedia are sometimes misleading, as this Wikipedia allows so-called fair-use (a specialty of U.S. copyright), whereas this material would be illegal on Commons. Some Wikia projects may also accept fair-use; you need to check that with your Wikia.

We have a page about Commons:Fan art; but I have little experience with that.

File:Chainsaw man.jpg shows the cover of a recent artwork and is thereby copyrighted. Though you have properly credited the artist, this does not make the use of this image legal. One possibiliy could be to directly contact Tatsuki Fujimoto and ask him whether he would give you a permission for this cover in a limited resolution. This might be possible. However, our policy requires it to be a general permission (= license), not just a "permission for Wikia". Our recommended license is CC-BY-SA (here the explanation in Japanese for Mr. Fujimoto: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.ja). He needs to send the permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 07:23, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Redirects

Hey Túrelio, Just curious, How do you come across redirects such as File:DSCN3733 - Davey2010.jpg ?, Do they appear in a category?,
I do plan on having them all deleted at some point but I was just curious as to how you find them :),
Thanks, Kind Regards, Dave // –Davey2010^Talk 14:27, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi Dave,

it had been speedy-tagged by User:GFJ as "broken redir", which results in being added to Category:Other speedy deletions. --Túrelio (talk) 14:45, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Hey Túrelio, Oops sorry I hadn't spotted the GFJ part, I should probably visit my local options lol, Many thanks for replying anyway,

Have a great day, Many thanks, Kind Regards, Dave // –Davey2010^Talk 14:48, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

(Talk-page stalker) @Davey2010: Special:BrokenRedirects updates every 3 days. -- CptViraj (📧) 15:14, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Request for image reinstatement

Greetings Túrelio My apologies in advance if this is not formatted correctly, I'm fairly new to Wikipedia and am still figuring out the technical parameters. I would like to request that the image "Chris Laufman aka Wise Blood" be reinstated. A request to modify the photographs licensing settings on Flickr has been heeded and it should now qualify for inclusion into Wikimedia Commons. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mapmaker88 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi Mapmaker88,

o.k. I've restored the image. However, just in case, you are the photographer, why did you/he change it to CC-Zero? For Commons that is not necessary, CC-BY, CC-BY-SA are fine and preferred. With CC-Zero, the photographer looses nearly all control, wrt copyright, over his work. --Túrelio (talk) 08:44, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Recent category deletions

Hi there. You recently deleted Category:Uncategorized images of the Northwest Territories, Category:Uncategorized images of Nunavut, and Category:Uncategorized images of Quebec. The reason provided was a link to Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/01/Category:Pochayiv Lavra - files to categorization, which has nothing to do with those categories, and does not mention them. There's a current discussion involving Category:Uncategorized images of Canada and its sub-categories at Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/01/Category:To be categorised by country, but that hasn't resolved yet, so no action should have been taken on these categories. Can you explain why you deleted these categories? Mindmatrix 22:01, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi, sure. They were empty and empty-tagged and the linked discussions seemed to agree to the deletion, for example: Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/01/Category:Pochayiv Lavra - files to categorization. However, as this was just maintenance, I would have no problem to restore them. --Túrelio (talk) 08:17, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Yes, please restore them. None of the linked discussions were related to the categories that were deleted. Thanks. Mindmatrix 13:55, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 22:27, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks again. Mindmatrix 00:31, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

PBCOM Milestone.jpg

Hi,

I am new to the job and still exploring Wikipedia parameters. You have deleted the PBCOM milestones.jpg I uploaded for our company's profile in Wikipedia. Based on what you have commented, it was from https://www.pbcom.com.ph/about-us/milestones and yes it was from our website. I was supposed to summarized the whole website including the photo type milestone and we are the copyright owner of the said image. Kindly revert back the image you have deleted. Thanks--PBCOM09041939 (talk) 01:52, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

I've replied at your posting on COM:UDR. --Túrelio (talk) 07:51, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Seitensperre

Hallo Túrelio, wie du auf de:User:Manfred Kuzel sehen kannst, ist dieser letzte Woche verstorben. Kannst du bitte seine Userseite auf Commons auch sperren. danke K@rl (talk) 14:29, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis. Wenn du möchtest, füge ihn doch auf Commons:Deceased contributors ein. RIP. --Túrelio (talk) 16:23, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Weiterleitung statt Löschung

Hallo Túrelio, warum hast du das Bild „Poritz Dorfkirche.jpg“ nicht gelöscht, sondern eine Weiterleitung auf das Duplikat mit etwas höherer Auflösung eingerichtet? Ein Grund zum Löschen war, dass keiner „Poritz Dorfkirche“ aufrufen wird, denn der Ort heißt Portitz und nicht Poritz. Ich hatte vorher aus gleichem Grund eine Schnelllöschung beantragt, die aber abgelehnt wurde. Beste Grüße --Martin Geisler (talk) 11:46, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Martin,

war ein paar Tage offline. Das Anlegen einer Weiterleitung ist der Standard bei dem Duplicate-Skript; der Prozess läuft nach Admin-Klick komplett automatisch. D.h., man müsste das wegklicken, wenn man das nicht will. Ich habe die WL jetzt manuell gelöscht, weil du die Datei ja bereits wenige Tage nach dem Upload markiert hattest. --Túrelio (talk) 16:18, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

URV

Hallo, du hast hier ein Foto gelöscht: [4]. Dies wurde jetzt schon wieder unter falschen Angaben hochgeladen: [5]. Gruß Bwag (talk) 07:20, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

 Done. Danke für den Hinweis. --Túrelio (talk) 07:26, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Hplovecraft-manuscript-thedreamsinthewitchhouse.jpg

File:Hplovecraft-manuscript-thedreamsinthewitchhouse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:44, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Hplovecraft-manuscript-thecaseofcharlesdexterward.jpg

File:Hplovecraft-manuscript-thecaseofcharlesdexterward.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:46, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Uğur Ersoy.jpg

Hi, why did you delete File:Uğur Ersoy ? I took that photo with my own camera. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 07:06, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi Nedim Ardoğa, it had been tagged as copyvio-suspected after it was found on an external website (see your talkpage). However, after re-checking, it seems the external hit is far younger than your upload. Therefore restored. --Túrelio (talk) 07:36, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 10:25, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Hasan tanal bal.jpg

Hi, why did you delete File:Hasan_tanal_bal? I took that photo with my own camera. And I shared it with Hasan Tanal BAL as copy photo. PrOOgRaMMeR (talk) 16:02, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi, as it had been tagged as copyvio-suspected after it was found on an external site, see your talkpage: User talk:PrOOgRaMMeR. Feel free to request undeletion at COM:UDR. --Túrelio (talk) 16:21, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

revdel

Hey Túrelio, Hope you're well,
When you have a spare 5 minutes could you delete the previous thumbnail at File:Suzuki Vitara Jx 4 U Hard-Top - 17 January 2018.jpg please due to privacy concerns,
Many thanks, Regards, Dave // –Davey2010^Talk 15:56, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

 Done. BTW: do you really need File:DSCN6308 - Davey2010 27.jpg be deleted? Though the background may be less nice than in the other, the bus in it is sharp, whereas it's slightly blurry in the other one. --Túrelio (talk) 16:05, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Many thanks for that much appreciated, Ah okay do you have a link to the blurry one as it'd take forever to go through my cats again :), Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 16:24, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Never mind found it, Many thanks for pointing that out, in thumbnail sort of size the file looks okay weirdly, Thanks again for your help, –Davey2010^Talk 16:35, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

The Joker

Nevermind, someone has replaced it Darkwarriorblake (talk) 18:25, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Foto da Flickr

Ciao, grazie del chiarimento (e mi scuso del trambusto)--Sayatek (talk) 11:28, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

YouTube licenses

Thanks for handling the copyvio at File:Lee joon hyuk.jpg. I just wanted to confirm that I understood correctly that it was a copyvio. I didn't see any info about licensing on the YouTube page for the video. Are you aware if any YouTube videos are freely licensed (and do I have to do anything special to see the licensing other than search for "licen" on the page)?

Here's another similar case (a user added this one to the enwiki article after the other one was delinked): File:190701 tvN 드라마 '60일,지정생존자' 제작발표회 이준혁.jpg

Thanks. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 18:28, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @AlanM1: COM:WHERE LICENSE - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 19:16, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

@AlanM1, I've reviewed the second image. --Túrelio (talk) 19:20, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz and Túrelio: Thanks. I'm glad I asked. I wonder why they hide it like that. Looks like I was just lucky with the first one (which I now went back and verified – it has no "License" field). Cheers! —[AlanM1(talk)]— 20:47, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Bild Dirk Rupnow

Sehr geehrter Túrelio,

ich schreibe Ihnen in Bezug auf die Löschung des Bildes von Dirk Rupnow [6]. Herr Rupnow selbst wünscht sich die Änderung des Bildes und gab das Bild frei.

Könnten Sie die Löschung bitte rückgängig machen und das Bild wieder freigeben und auf seiner Seite einstellen?

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Stm.ibk — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stm.ibk (talk • contribs) 07:28, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Hallo @Stm.ibk,

ich habe das betreffende Foto nicht selbst gelöscht, sondern nur auf das Problem hingewiesen. Aber egal: das Problem ist, dass als Quelle die Seite https://www.uibk.ac.at/zeitgeschichte/mitarbeiterinnen/rupnow.html.de angegeben war, die nicht unter einer freien Lizenz steht[7]. Ferner war als Urheber "Andreas Friedle" angegeben. Bei einer solchen Konstellation ist immer eine Genehmigung erforderlich. Hintergrund: auf der Wikipedia (jedenfalls der deutschsprachigen) dürfen nur Bilder verwendet werden, die vom legitimen Urheber oder Rechteinhaber unter einer freien Lizenz (COM:L) freigegeben wurden, was zur Folge hat, das sie von jederman, der sich an die Lizenzbedingungen hält, frei benutzt werden können. D.h., eine Freigabe "nur für Wikipedia" ist nicht möglich. Dies hat natürlich Auswirkungen auf die Monetarisierungsmöglichkeiten des Urhebers. Bei Fotos identifizierbarer lebender Personen sind, je nach Umständen, eigentlich 2 verschiedene Freigaben erforderlich: zunächst einmal die urheberrechtliche vom Urheber/Fotografen und dann die persönlichkeitsrechtliche vom Abgebildeten.

Konkret zur Freigabe: idealerweise sollte der Urheber die Freigabe seines Fotos unter einer konkreten freien Lizenz (hier empfohlen: cc-by-sa-4.0-at) unter Nennung des Dateinamen auf Commons (oder der URL) an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org senden. Falls der Abgebildete ausreichend Rechte vom Urheber erhalten hat, kann er/sie dies auch selbst tun. Eine Textvorlage dafür findet sich hier: Commons:E-Mail-Vorlagen#Einverständniserklärung_(Rechte-Inhaber). --Túrelio (talk) 08:38, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

suppression photo Pierre GEMME (File:P.GEMME.jpg)

Bonjour, Je vois que vous avez supprimé ma photo sur la page "Pierre Gemme auteur" sous prétexte qu'elle figurait sur un site de la FNAC. Je vous signale que je suis l'auteur de cette photo (autoportrait), et que la FNAC m'a demandé de la lui communiquer pour illustrer les annonces de mes séances de dédicaces. Merci de la rétablir. Cordialement, Pierre GEMME — Preceding unsigned comment added by QUARTZcitrin (talk • contribs) 08:17, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Bonjour Pierre,

parce que je ne parle que très peu le français, I need to write in english.

The problem is that fnac.com claims copyright over the content of their website[8] and they did not credit you as the photographer or rightsholder (which is bad anyway).

In such a scenario, a confirmation is always required. Please copy the text from the permission-template at Commons:Messages_type#Envoyer_directement_par_email, enter the filename (File:P.GEMME.jpg), date and sign it, and send it from your official/business email address to permissions-fr@wikimedia.org . Drop me a note when you have sent the mail; then I can conditionally restore the image. --Túrelio (talk) 08:51, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Request for the restoration of File:Sardine VIII agosto.jpg

After the deletion of File:Sardine VIII agosto.jpg, I've changed the image's license on Flickr. If it's possible, I would appreciate if the file could be restored.

Many thanks for your attention,

HartemLijn (talk) 15:12, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:40, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

"YT source is under CC-BY"

You mean that any videoclip, from any singer or musician, is free to copy?

Can you show me where this politics is written? For Portuguese Wikipedia forbids contents from YT because of copyrights.

Thanks. Yanguas (talk) 17:37, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

kindly state which file you are talking about. (I had 650 edits yesterday) --Túrelio (talk) 07:39, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Since I asked a direct question about politics, I thought it was not necessary, but this is it. Yanguas (talk) 17:22, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi, the term is policies, not politics.

The image File:Leo Magalhães 2018.png is taken from a YT video, labeled as "Faxina No Coração - Lucas Seabra ft. Léo Magalhães (Clipe Oficial)" and offered since August 2018 on the likely official YT account of Léo Magalhães [9]. So, these are strong indications that the person behind this YT account has enough rights to offer this video under the choosen CC-BY license. Therefore, we can consider it legitimate. --Túrelio (talk) 21:39, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

User:Badlydrawnboy22

Hallo Túrelio, könntest du bitte User:Badlydrawnboy22 die Rechte als "Automatisch bestätigter Benutzer" erteilen?
Danke uned beste Grüße: Orchi (talk) 15:07, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi Orchi,

das war er schon automatisch (also ohne Zutun meinerseits), jedenfalls als ich gerade danach geschaut habe. Bleib gesund! --Túrelio (talk) 08:33, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

...Hallo Túrelio, Dank für Deine Mühe. Am 13. März 2020 war (und ist) bei Aktivität von "Badlydrawnboy22" noch ein rotes Ausrufungszeichen. Aber das wird sich dann wohl erledigen. Grüße. Orchi (talk) 14:08, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Deletion of category

Hi Túrelio ,

I have noted that you have deleted Category:Uncategorized images of Copenhagen. What is the rationale ? It is a quite useful category and need not be be emptied by moving files into Category:Copenhagen. --Pugilist (talk) 21:57, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi Pugilist,

if I remember correctly, all or many categories of that type have been deleted recently. As I have no strong opinion about that, I've restored it for now. But you should discuss this with User:Estopedist1 who had speedy-tagged it. Bliv sund! --Túrelio (talk) 08:36, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio. Thanks for your reply. I will look further into it with User:Estopedist1. Pass auf dich auf. - There is a lot to worry about at the moment. Best regards Pugilist (talk) 21:58, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Copyvio video

Hi Túrelio, You can find same video diffirent source here, here and here before that upload. Presidential office belongs to copyvio this video. I couldn't find original version. Regards, Sakhalinio (talk) 21:22, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Ok. I've deleted it now. --Túrelio (talk) 21:36, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

about deleting jose luis poveda.jpg

•  Comment At the moment of uploading this picture I've talked to the author of the photo -> Daniel González Fernández https://www.danifotografo.com/ and the communications manager of the Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria -> Borja Gitrama Sancho as you can check at their website https://www.sefh.es/staff.php both of them told me that this picture is free to use at wikimedia and wikipedia. In addition this morning I've written to Borja Gitrama in order to invite him to free the use of this picture properly through wikimedia system. Do you think I can do anything else? Many thanks SpanishCicerone--SpanishCicerone — Preceding unsigned comment added by SpanishCicerone (talk • contribs) 10:41, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I've replied on your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 10:50, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Image review on your license

Good morning, I want to ask you for help, can you check the file on your free license compatibility?. The file is File:Felipe Calderón H 2014.jpg to be approved or rejected.--Dimartz (talk) 16:19, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi, can't really say at this moment. The license on Flickr is rather useless for us, as it provides no real information whether the account-holder is the author or rights-holder. The institution seems rather not to be from the US federal government, so it also doesn't fall under U.S. gov-pd. You might ask them whether this image is really their own work. --Túrelio (talk) 21:28, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Bergkamen Gedenkstaette IMGP4156 wp.jpg / File:Bergkamen Gedenkstaette IMGP4174 wp.jpg / File:Bergkamen Gedenkstaette IMGP4165 wp.jpg / File:Bergkamen Gedenkstaette IMGP4166 wp.jpg

Hello. I understand correctly that you see exactly the same thing in these images? — Ирука¹³ 09:05, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi Ирука,

personally yes. The depicted item is clearly identified by the current filename. As we don't (and likely will never) have scores of images from the same monument, the filename does not need to be more specific. Of course, this reasoning would not be valid for a town (Paris_007.jpg is not o.k.). For the other elements in the filename: the number might be important for the uploader/photographer and is of help in combination with a filename of that type; the "IMGP" and the "wp" could be dispensable, IMO. --Túrelio (talk) 09:49, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

But on two of the images I see only text supposedly related to the monument. And COM:FN prescribes in such cases to give as accurate names as possible, which falls under paragraph 8 of the second criterion of the COM:RM ("Louvre", not "Paris"). — Ирука¹³ 10:40, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Help to cancel request to delete images form the Prevale category (File:Carlo Prevale 2017.jpg)

Hi Túrelio,

in the category: Prevale by mistake the removal of 2 images of author Prevale has been requested, I ask for your help to remove the proposal because the author of the images on his website: Prevale Gallery under license has granted its use then uploading. Can you please help me? Thank you.

The authors of the proposal agree with me, however, they recommended your intervention. Conversation with Patrik Rogel

Conversation with Ytojoda — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emilygarbi (talk • contribs) 19:28, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

@Emilygarbi, sorry, I came a bit late, so the DR discussion was already closed.

Anyway, as my colleague wrote in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Carlo Prevale 2016.png, you should request undeletion for both deleted files at COM:UDR, but first try to fulfil the requirements mentioned by Эlcobbola in said deletion request. --Túrelio (talk) 14:03, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Česko šije roušky

Could you please renew the category, you have deleted. Its non of the stated. Thanks! --Juandev (talk) 09:44, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:52, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Rampant copyright infringements

Hello. I come from English Wikipedia, and when a contributor is known to have 4-5 or more flagrant copyright violations, we open an investigation of all their contributions, because the violations we find are often merely the "tip of the iceberg". I wonder if any process is available here on Commons, where copyright is possibly much more likely to be infringed? As you know, I have examined the contributions of User:Thuy Ho and found the vast majority to be copyright violations. Administrators have mostly agreed with me, except for a few instances where you merely reverted because you couldn't find any evidence. I suggest that this contributor be investigated. I left some of his uploads alone because they appeared to be simple non-professional panoramic type snapshots that could be taken by anyone. But some people surely have a knack for stealing photos and presenting them as "Own work" and slipping by the copyright filter here. I find them once in a while coming to English Wikipedia and linking to their uploads. I strive to be thorough in wiping out their contributions when I can plainly see they are all copyvios. Is there any help or relief for people like me? Or should I just do them one at a time? Elizium23 (talk) 22:39, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Category:1993 monuments and memorials in Canada

Hi there, could you please restore this category, as it currently has a member (which I just added). Also, do you know which files were deleted (or removed from the category) to result in this category being empty? Mindmatrix 17:35, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:58, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Category:Chedi Amir

Hi there, could you please restore this category, The entity now is notable. by 3 Wikipedia articles. Best Regards

Wikidata: Q87721990

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Chedi_Amir Chdondon1990 (talk) 08:52, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

 Done. But you need to correct the association to WikiData, as an error is displayed. --Túrelio (talk) 08:58, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

I’ll do that. Thank you very much Chdondon1990 (talk) 10:21, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Categorization

Hi Túrelio, I was wondering why you deleted this category and if it would be a problem to create it again. Since there is a Wikidata now. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 06:49, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi Lotje, it had been empty and tagged. Now restored. However, the WikiData template seems to need some work. --Túrelio (talk) 08:45, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Image site defense.Gouv

L'armée française diffuse toute ses image en cc. By. Sa. 4... C'est marqué en référence du site. Cordialement Oursmili (talk) 21:08, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi, but where? I went to the source-page of File:Élément militaire de réanimation.png and looked around, but didn't find any hint. --Túrelio (talk) 21:10, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Wrong deletion of the Albanian flag file

Recently you deleted this file:

(https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Albanian_Flag_-_The_flag_of_Albania.png)

For the assumed reason that it was a duplicate, a copy of the current picture, however you didn't notice the minor but very important change, look at the tail, in my picture its longer and sharper, in the current flag on wiki is a wrong/false version of the albanian flag because the tail is shorter and rounder. Look at the law 8926 pdf version in wikipedia, you'll see a picture there in the document, of how the official flag of Albania looks according to the law, and this version that I uploaded is the correct one.

I urge you to look at the law. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arianitialbania (talk • contribs) 23:14, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

O.k. I've temp-restored the file. --Túrelio (talk) 08:31, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Villarosa Pictures that were stolen from me by Jim Turner

Thanks for you help with the photos that Jim Turner stole from my Flickr site - it appears as if he stole at least nine or ten pictures and credited himself as the photographer. I have just gone over my copyrights on each photo on Flicker and have changed the permissions on each to Attribution-Share Alike - I hope that's the correct one as I've had to change them a couple of times today to ensure that I would be given credit for them here on Wikimedia. Again, thanks for your help.BassoonKap (talk) 18:30, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi BassoonKap, thanks, that is great. I will change the description and credits for your misattributed images. Would you prefer to be credited by your Wikimedia-user name or by the your Flickr-user name Jeff La Marca? --Túrelio (talk) 18:47, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Redirecting files I uploaded to other file

Why did you make chaos by redirecting files I uploaded, versions of 2020 BMW logo, all of them to former logo version? You forced me to spend now time and update those files again, with other date and maybe other inconsistencies... User Yrsari vandalized those versions of 2020 logo, and everything that was needed was revert, not redirecting and merging histories etc. --Obsuser (talk) 02:54, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I just processed some duplicate-requests for BMW logos, which looked to be plausible to me. ell me if you need help with undeletions. Currently, 2 more BMW logos are duplicate-requested: File:BMW Grey-Colour RGB.svg and File:BMW White-Colour RGB.svg.--Túrelio (talk) 09:41, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Undelete request for File:Chiesa Madre "San Giacomo" (Villarosa) (L’Altare Maggiore, consacrato alla Madonna Assunta).jpg

Could you undelete this file? It was initially licensed “all rights reserved”, but the Flickr user has since changed to a free CC license. Thanks. Ytoyoda (talk) 00:45, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Oh, and it looks like BassoonKap has already been in contact with you above. Ytoyoda (talk) 00:46, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:28, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Question

Why did you make this? Special:Diff/409640538. I thought you did it because it was {{Copyvio}} so I replaced it with {{Copyvionote}}, but I then realized that was what it already was.Jonteemil (talk) 15:30, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I don't remember exactly. My intention was as in this edit to prevent the whole talkpage requested for speedy deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 19:31, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, doing it to {{db-g7}} makes sense, but doing it to {{Copyvionote}} makes less sense. Human error?Jonteemil (talk) 19:47, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Marlon Vera

Hola. Si comprendo, hubo un error, pues pensé que estaba bajo la licencia adecuada. Aunque mi error fue más que nada por que tenía una licencia de uso no comercial, pero si se podía compartir. Ahora que lo menciona, parece ser que el hecho de que esté con una licencia de no comercial la hace no admitida para commons. Por lo que veo es así. Saludos cordiales.--LocoWiki (talk) 18:18, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Exactamente. De las licencias CC, aquellos con ND o NC no están permitidos en Commons (COM:L). --Túrelio (talk) 19:58, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Incorrect Copyright violation

After reading the complete conflict of interest guidelines, I am more unclear about why anything was flagged on a Wikipedia page that was edited. I am requesting a detailed explanation, please.

There was absolutely no copyrighted material used on the edited page. The first response from Wikipedia referenced a photo that was used by another website, but that photo and its rights is used with permission. That particular photo is used all over the web with permission. Now the Wikipedia page has reverted back to a very old version of Wikipedia page with a majority of significantly outdated information, including reference to organizations that no longer exist.

All of the edits on the Wikipedia page in question were factual, containing information about the current artistic/musical organizations with whom the referenced person is connected. There was no soapboxing, promotion, or advertising.

I am requesting a detailed explanation of your actions, please. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sbyess (talk • contribs) 21:07, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi Sbyess,

you are here at Commons, not at Wikipedia, which is a separate project. As an admin on Commons, I've deleted the image, you are probably refering to, File:Byess Steven 112 ret.tif due to copyvio-suspicion. Such a suspicion rises nearly automatically if a user uploads an image that is found already published elsewhere at the time of upload to Commons. Your username Sbyess suggest that you are the depicted person Steven Byess. If that is true, it is a bit unlikely that you did shoot this professionally looking image by yourself. So, you shouldn't claim it as "own work". COI issues are relevant at Wikipedia, but less so at Commons.

So, provided you are Mr. Byess (or acting on his behalf) and Mr. Byess having obtained enough rights from the photographer of this image, the solution is to send an email from his official/business address to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, using the wording of the boxed declaration at Commons:Email_templates#Email_message_template_for_release_of_rights_to_a_file, in which he claryfies the authorship (name of photographer, agreed upon name for the crediting), confirms to have enough rights obtained from photographer and his intent to release the image under the choosen free license. --Túrelio (talk) 07:57, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Nintendo DSi logo.svg

Can this be undone? This is not a duplicate. Ryūkotsusei (talk) 18:49, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:35, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Tagging copyvios

Hi Ji-Elle, thanks for tagging copyvio-suspected images. However, as your coypvio-suspicion will usually be based on a pre-publication in the web, you should write that finding (either the single-hit URL or the Google-images results-URL) into the copyvio-tag, when tagging an image. Otherwise, the processing admin has to do this research again, which is an unncessary workload. In case you have no specific evidence, it's more appropriate to ask for regular deletion than for speedy deletion. By the way, do you see a link like "report copyvio" in the toolbox at the left-side column on your image-pages? Using this, requires less clicks and automatically notifies the uploader. --Túrelio (talk) 07:33, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

I perfectly understand your point of view. What you may not know is that for 6 weeks I am categorizing the 12000 pictures of Wiki Loves Africa 2020 [10] and I do this every year. It is a HUGE task. When I sometimes fall upon copyright problems, it would be easier not to do anything, ich würde viel Zeit sparen. Well, the contest will be over in 2 days... Remind me this next year.. -- Ji-Elle (talk) 07:52, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Paoladb.jpg

It doesn’t have copyright violation because I have the permission from the user that took it and posted it so please restore it. AntonioTonioCartonioSusanna (talk) 11:03, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Where is this permission and what kind of permission did you obtain? It needs to be sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 09:08, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

I can provide you the screenshot of the blogger that told me I can use her photo. If you can explain me how, I will immediately send an email. AntonioTonioCartonioSusanna (talk) 20:37, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi, do not send it to me, instead send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org and don't forget to mention the filename of the image. --Túrelio (talk) 21:15, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Copyright Logo

Hallo, sie haben unser BDR FM Loggo als Copyright geschütztes Bild eingestuft was auch richtig ist aber ich bin der Besitzer des Senders und habe alle rechte am Bild. Deswegen würde ich mich freuen wenn sie es wieder freigeben würden

Grüße Angelo Klama Hebndnfn (talk) 11:07, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Angelo,

in solchen Fällen benötigen wir eine Bestätigung vom Urheber oder Rechteinhaber. Das ist kein individuelles Mißtrauen, aber es kann halt jeder ein Nutzerkonto unter einem beliebigen Namen anlegen. Schicke bitte von deiner offiziellen/Business-Adresse eine Email an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org, in der du bestätigst der Urheber oder Rechteinhaber des Logos zu sein und dass du es unter der gewählten freien Lizenz freigeben willst. Du kannst dafür folgende Textvorlage verwenden: Commons:E-Mail-Vorlagen#Einverständniserklärung_(Rechte-Inhaber). Persönlicher Tipp von mir, falls du oder der Sender das Logo nicht auch als "Trademark" geschützt habt, solltet ihr das erwägen, damit nicht ein konkurrierender Sender das Logo mißbrauchen kann. --Túrelio (talk) 15:42, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Die Genehmigung sollte das derzeit gelöschte und auch das gerade hochgeladene Logo File:Neues Logo von BDR FM.jpg einbeziehen. --Túrelio (talk) 15:44, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Offensichtliche URV

Hallo Túrelio,

mir fallen immer wieder offensichtliche URV's auf Commons auf. Schema immer gleich: Niedrige Auflösung für 2019/2020, fehlende Exif-Daten, Pkw-Modelle einer bestimmten Marke, immer wieder neue Accounts mit Ramschuploads (wiederum mit Exif - zur Tarnung?), unterschiedliche Länderkennzeichen und andere Details (mediterrane Landschaft mit Olivenbäumen passt nicht zum tschechischen Kennzeichen). Wegen der niedrigen Auflösung und Unschärfe gehe ich von Screenshots aus Videos aus. Betrifft bis dato folgende User:

• LaKlement
• Mike-fiesta

Wäre generell für das Löschen eines Großteils der Bilder von neuen Pkw-Modellen und Sperre der User. Was meinst du? Was weiter machen? Danke dir! Pan Tau (talk) 08:28, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Pan Tau, sorry, ich bin bislang noch nicht dazu gekommen. Hoffentlich am Freitag. --Túrelio (talk) 19:11, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio, hat keine Eile. Läuft ja nicht davon. :) Liebe Grüße, Pan Tau (talk) 12:28, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

mistake deleting an Article

Good Morning. I just see that you no only deleted the Pictures that I took myself from paintings that I have rights, but the entire article. if you decide for some reason that it can't be allowed here, Im going to take it out. In that case, I need you to return me the access to that file as soon as you can. I will appreciate it. Thanks.

Santiago Gualberto Rodriguez Murua. 16/05/2020 14:23 pm — Preceding unsigned comment added by SantiagoG971 (talk • contribs) 17:24, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I assume you are refering to the content of User:SantiagoG971, right? Your userpage is provided to give the Commons community useful information about yourself, but not as a place for article-drafts. I have copied the deleted content into User:SantiagoG971/sandbox.

With regard to your photos of paintings by Julio Romera, such as File:Obra de Romera.jpg, please be aware that his works are likely protected til end of 2076. It doesn't help that you shot a photo of his paintings by yourself, it still violates his copyright. That's true even for paintings in your legal ownership. You need to provide a permission from his heir(s). --Túrelio (talk) 19:10, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

File:헌터리아 롯데백화점 대전점 단독공연 및 팬사인회 사진 4.jpg and others

Hi Túrelio, I hope you are well. You deleted this file (and a couple others) that was uploaded a few years ago by Jinmoy and then just recently tagged by the uploader as copyvios. However, it appears they all came from an official twitter account and were License Reviewed at the time. The twitter account no longer exists, but we have License Review for just this type of case. Storkk (talk) 11:34, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

In case you agree, you can undelete and add them to the mass DR at Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Jinmoy. Storkk (talk) 11:53, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi Storkk, ok. I hope to have catched them all. --Túrelio (talk) 12:18, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. All the best, Storkk (talk) 12:24, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Cleanup

Thanks for helping me cleaning up the fixing of tons of single DRs into a batch one!Jonteemil (talk) 20:50, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 08:24, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Copyright issues with User:Qiushufang

Hello. I am contacting you since you were involved in the identification of a copyvio by the said user (1). There is an ongoing discussion about further cases. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 23:04, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

:File:Farid Al Atrash.png

@Túrelio: Hi, Túrelio: I wanted to know why you delete this image File:Farid Al Atrash.png when the source is flickr Under license creative commons (Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-SA 2.0) ) [11]. You allege that a screenshot of this Twitter post [12] that was created on December 21, 2018 was deleted, but the image I uploaded to the commons is from February 2, 2011. I would like to know what the criteria is? Regards!--Derbake (talk) 20:17, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi Derbake,

when an admin processes a deletion-request for copyvio, it's sometimes not a simple binary situation, but you have weigh all the available evidence and then base your decision on the overall pciture. The above mentioned image was such a case. From the image-quality it was clear to me that this image was likely a still or screenshot/capture from an older video or movie, which is likely far older than 2018 or 2011. So, likely neither the image on Flickr nor the one on Twitter is correctly licensed.

If an image of the depicted person is very important for you, you might try to find the true source, i.e. the movie or video from which it was taken. However, being a color video, it's unlikely that it's already into the public domain. --Túrelio (talk) 20:48, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Túrelo, for your time to respond. I will take this into account for future uploads.--Derbake (talk) 21:11, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Question about renaming

Hi, Túrelio...I'm not sure you can fix this but File:National_Institute_Of_Biotechnology_And_Genetics_Engineering,_Faislabad,_Pakistan.jpg is incorrectly named and Faisalabad is misspelled. Is it possible to rename an image file like we do articles, or would it create a mess? The proper name and correct spelling is here so the new file name would be National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (NIBGE), and it's located in Faisalabad, Pakistan. I added a correctly named/spelled caption. Ping me when you reply. Thank you! ^Atsme _Talk 📧 17:35, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

@Atsme: , renamed: File:National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (NIBGE), Faisalabad, Pakistan.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 20:03, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Túrelio, you deserve a raise for all the good work you do!! Thank you...^Atsme _Talk 📧 20:17, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

recreation of copyright image

Hi there, I saw you were the one to delete File:La hiedra by ric capullo colored by danolvera dc0nivb-pre.jpg, unfortunately the user has taken that same image and created File:Camiseta new.jpg and is pretending it's their own work. I'm not familiar with the deletion process on Commons, can you help me get this obvious copyvio removed? MPJ-DK (talk) 18:46, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 19:59, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Deletion request question

Hi Túrelio, can you help me see how you can save the images that were nominated in this deletion request [13] Many of those images were uploaded 10 years ago with licenses in the public domain (Egypt, Lebanon, Syria) respectively. A week ago a reviewing user nominated them for deletion saying that the source was not specified. The images are in the public domain from the beginning of the last or mid-century, are all over the internet and are part of the cultural heritage of those countries that used them for their publications in the newspapers. All of these images are only to illustrate Wikipedia posts. Is there any way I can amend them? thanks.--Derbake (talk) 22:03, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Mia Khalifa

Hey Túrelio. Am I missing something about Mia Khalifa? It has been re-uploaded numerous times and is deleted each time. --Mhhossein ^talk 12:22, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi Mhhossein, she's obviously a very popular lady. So far, there was only 1 upload in 2020. Ofg course, we could block the filename, but that wouldn't really help. It seems that all uploads happened from different account (only 1 had a re-upload). We'll probably have to live with this phenomenon. --Túrelio (talk) 12:41, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Cynog Dafis

Hi please could you tell me which licence applies to the photo you've deleted. I believe it's free to use if credited.:

Here is the original: https://www.flickr.com/photos/plaidcymru/31347587628/in/dateposted/

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Cynog Davis.jpg

Regards Littlemonday (talk) 14:31, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi, on the Flickr source page you can see 3 license-icons on the white ribbon below the image. The 2nd and the 3rd icon stand for "no commercial use" and "no derivatives". Each one of them is a no-go on Commons. Only images licensed CC-BY or CC-BY-SA or CC-Zero are acceptable on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 18:48, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Please Review Li Xian

Greetings, Túrelio!

My apologies for any inconvenience, please review photo https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Li_Xian_Chinese_Actor.png thank you Puchicatos (talk) 21:17, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi Puchicatos, I see no evidence that this video was ever under a free license. I've gone to the oldest archived version (from August 2019)[14] and even there was no CC license mentioned. If you have other evidence, you neede to present it here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Li Xian Chinese Actor.png. --Túrelio (talk) 08:49, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Laghouat-urbain.jpg

The image titled: " File:Laghouat-urbain.jpg" . On the pretext that it was taken from the website has been deleted: " http://www.pressemedicale.com/evenement/le-1er-congres-de-cancerologie-de-laghouat-prise-en-charge-des-cancers-feminins". Note that this image has been available to the public for years and is freely available on social websites and the above site was taken from social networks. I modified this free image and got tired of it while it is serving the topic you put it in. Please I want it back please.--Jemo2200 (talk) 11:02, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi, "available to the public" is not of significance with regard to copyright. The website pressemedicale.com does not carry any statement declaring its content as public domain or being released under a free license. So, if you don't have any specific release information for this image, you may request restoration at COM:UDR. --Túrelio (talk) 20:15, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

F3 speedy

Hi, looking at File:Nasirol molk Mosqueee.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) the F3 is unclear. There are other photographs of this famous mosque hosted and DW has not been an issue. Could you explain this deletion, or consider moving to DR instead? Thanks --Fæ (talk) 13:04, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi, initially the image had been speedy-tagged with G7 by its uploader, which is also shown in the deletion-log. As I assumed the depicted window to be a more recent work, I've added DW as an additional rationale, which might not have been justified. There you are: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nasirol molk Mosqueee.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 20:09, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Group delete

Hi, i need a (Commons:Deletion requests/Mass deletion) request for all of my uploads.05F2uIhfx0Rv (talk) 20:18, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

USPS File Deletion

You deleted my file which is part of an article I’m creating for the second in charge of the United States Postal Service and was linked as such. You classified your removal as gibberish which it is not. Can you undelete the file please? Galendalia (talk) 10:59, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi, not sure to which file you are relating; and you have currently no deleted file. File:USPS Logo.png is not deleted, only discussed for deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 13:09, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Photo marked as not having permission

You have marked a photo as not having permission... JFPHISTORIAN. The photo was taken by our school rugby magazine, of which I am the owner and publisher. It was taken by myself for use in my magazine of Mr Jeremy Reingold, a famous international rugby player / sportsman and former student at our college . I am happy for anybody to use the image. Our magazine is Factual History Periodical , FHP in South Africa Regards F Pienaar JFPHISTORIAN (talk) 08:54, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi JFPHISTORIAN,

ok. Then please send a confirmation from your official/business email address to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, in which you confirm your author ship and your intent to release the uploaded image (mention the filename) under the choosen free license. I will convert to current copyvio-tag to a no-perm-tag, which gives you more time. When you have sent the mentioned permission/confirmation, just drop me a note here, so that I can add that information, which will give the process even more time. --Túrelio (talk) 20:00, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Suppression image Mouvement 3 Th. Bontridder

Bonjour, La photo "Mouvement 3" est une photo que j'ai prise lors de l'exposition de Thierry Bontridder à l'Espace Bauthier à Ittre en 2012. Je photographie les oeuvres d'artistes que j'admire; ensuite, je leur offre gratuitement mes plus belles photos qu'ils peuvent utilisés librement sur leur site ou publication. Ce geste est très apprécié et me permet d'entretenir d'agréables contacts avec eux. J'ai offert cette photo à Thierry Bontridder ! Par ailleurs, il a donné son accord via courriel "Republication" pour l'ensemble de l'article (texte et photos) à son sujet !! N'hésitez-pas à le contacter pour vérifier. Merci de replacer cette photo {{Attente OTRS}}, --KtyMBA (talk) 09:57, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi KtyMBA,

sorry for replying in english, but my former school-french has nearly disappeared. As you seem to have sent a permission to OTRS, I will conditionally restore the image. However, you need to be aware (likely you are already), that you need a permission by the artist for your photography of his work. --Túrelio (talk) 20:06, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello

Recently uploaded a photo in hopes of amending Christina Aguilera’s main photo on her info page. As someone intentionally uploaded an unflattering photo from 2012. I have since uploaded my own photo I have permission to use as I own it (it was taken at a meet and greet I had with her) but when I attempt to amend the photo it says “please upload a photo first to enable editing” I’m hoping you can help and get whoever posted the current photo banned from purposely uploading outdated unflattering photos in future to her page. Kind Regards GeraintRamon (talk) 11:23, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi GeraintRamon,

not sure whether you are refering to image File:Christina Aguilera 2013 American Singer Songwriter.jpg. This one has been deleted as it is by Joe Scarnici/Getty Images and not at all a free image. To the contrary, Getty Images agency is known to persue anybody using their images without paying for them. --Túrelio (talk) 07:48, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Skinny asian male.jpg

Examining

1. File:Skinny asian male.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
2. File:Skinny asian male back.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

I understand why the rename was done, but the speedy log appears factually incorrect, the rationale of being out of scope does not apply to this photograph as it is a potentially useful high resolution and non-sexualized photo of a less common body type. The new title is not ideal, and any courtesy anonymity issues can be handled without deletion (or a correspondence via OTRS). Would you consider undeleting and going to a courtesy DR if you feel there are grounds? Thanks --Fæ (talk) 12:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi, in case you are not aware of the full edit-history: both files had been tagged by the uploader himself as {{speedydelete|Not educationally useful}}, who likely a posteriori might found himself embarrassed over these photos, as he is fully identifiable. My rationale für the deletion was actually courtesy/G7 per the assumed embarrassment. My fault was not to actively change the pre-existing rationale, so it went into the log-record. I would only ask you to include this circumstance into your consideration. If you then still prefer undeletion, I will do so. --Túrelio (talk) 19:35, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. I understand the reasoning and something like 'courtesy deletion for unused upload' would be good in the log next time. Rather than drawing attention via a DR, someone in these circumstances could be advised off-wiki, if they are finding deletion difficult. In this case it seems the photographer may not be the subject, and they may have been satisfied with anonymity rather than deletion, but your judgement is okay by me. Had the photos been in use it would be a far more awkward case to handle quietly. --Fæ (talk) 19:56, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletes

Hallo Túrelio; ich habe in letzter Zeit ein paar offene DRs geschlossen, bei denen auf die Datei in der Zwischenzeit ein Schnelllöschantrag gestellt wurde, den du danach umgesetzt, aber dabei den DR offengelassen hattest, Beispiel Commons:Deletion requests/File:Robert Blaich.jpg (DR-Template stand auch immer noch auf der Seite). Wäre vielleicht ganz praktisch, wenn du in solchen Fällen auch gleich den Löschantrag erledigen würdest. Wollte nur darauf hinweisen, keine grosse Sache :-) Gestumblindi (talk) 01:10, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Danke für die Erinnerung. Hab mir danach Mühe gegeben, immer daran zu denken. --Túrelio (talk) 09:24, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Support Request

Hello! I'd like to ask your help! The Hungarian tourist information boards legal situation changed. All files started deleting [15][16] that related to text, photo, map. So I'd like to delete full content of Category:Information boards in Kis-Sváb Hill Protection Area and Category:Information boards in Rupp Hill Conservation Area maybe others, because every has text, photo or map. I dont know how can own files (in a complite category) deleting. These two categories content only files from me. Thank You. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 15:28, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi Globetrotter19,

that's really said, but likely cannot be changed. O.k., I will take care of the files in these 2 categories. --Túrelio (talk) 15:34, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Thx! It was really fast. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 15:53, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

RIP

Can you please revdel this and the following rv edit? Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 15:51, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 16:16, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Machen wir solche Todesfälle normalerweise auch am Schwarzen Brett bekannt? Ich könnte mir zumindest für COM:AN eine Nachricht vorstellen, dass der Kollege nicht mehr unter uns weilt. Wer viel mit ihm zu tun gehabt hat, wird wohl sowieso seine Benutzerseite beobachten, aber ich finde, man sollte es einfach im Kreise der Admins bekannt geben. @Steinsplitter: was meinst Du dazu? De728631 (talk) 16:33, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Hat sich erledigt. Es gibt bereits eine Nachricht an der Village Pump. De728631 (talk) 16:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Habe eine Nachricht auf AN hinterlassen: COM:AN. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:40, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Ja, vielen Dank dafür. De728631 (talk) 16:43, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Violación de derechos de autor de varias imágenes que subi

Hola me llamo Melitón y pues quería saber si les puse los links de dónde venían las fotos porque me las están borre y borre le di crédito a los creadores del dibujo de la luchadora la hiedra y aún así me lo marcaron como violación al copyright de que se trata que tienen algo contra mi persona o que les pasa quiero saber ? Kaiserdeleo (talk) 07:55, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

• File:La hiedra by kaiserleo.jpg - you claimed it as own work, but it was published by Dan Olvera here and © 2018-2020 DanOlvera.
• File:Camiseta new.jpg - you claimed it as own work, which may be true for the photo of the t shirt, but the image on the t shirt is just a simplified derivative of the above mentioned image.
• File:La hiedra by ric capullo colored by danolvera dc0nivb-pre.jpg is identical to File:La hiedra by kaiserleo.jpg.

Does this answer your question? --Túrelio (talk) 10:58, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Deletion

Hello!

You deleted Category:SVG images with required raster graphics with the reason: "treats general case as spacial case". Can you please explain what you mean? I figured it should be undeleted since it has files.Jonteemil (talk) 03:19, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

it has been tagged with this rationale by User:Watchduck and was empty when I had deleted it. Now restored. --Túrelio (talk) 07:37, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Lassen Sie mich in Ruhe

Lutz Fehling Lutz Fehling (talk) 15:22, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Filemover rights request

Hi there. Several days ago, I put in a request for filemover rights over at Commons:Requests for rights, and the guideline at the top of the page says "[i]f your request has remained unanswered for several days, consider personally asking an administrator".

As I said in my nomination, I'm a prolific file uploader with an unfortunate bad habit of typos in filenames, and I would sooner take on the responsibility of correcting such filename errors myself than burden other editors with my mistakes. (In fact, the reason why your username stuck out to me at Special:ListUsers/sysop was because you've answered a few of my rename requests yourself!)

If there's anything you can do to speed the process along, it would be most helpful and appreciated. Thank you.

-- Andre Carrotflower (talk) 04:16, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Comment

The Cfccreates flickr ID has been a rich source of images of people associated with movies. I've uploaded well over a thousand images they posted on flickr, and about 400 headshots I cropped from those images.

This is the first time they have requested the deletion of an image. I didn't want to say this at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kathryn Emslie at a CFC event in L.A. - Honouring John Fawcett and Graeme Manson (16740223837).jpg - but I think the explanation for the deletion is vanity. Ms Emslie is part of the management team at the Canadian Film Centre. Whoever runs the cfccreates flickr id is presumably a lot more junior than Ms Emslie.

Anyhow, since was one they uploaded, I think File:CFC in L.A. - Honouring John Fawcett and Graeme Manson (16740223837).jpg is unobjectionable.

It never occurred to me to consider the flatteringness of the crop of Ms Emslie. But I don't think File:Virginia Rankin at a CFC event in L.A. - Honouring John Fawcett and Graeme Manson (16740223837).jpg is particularly unflattering. Anyhow, she isn't CFC management. So I am happy to let sleeping dogs lie.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 23:37, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Confusion on deletion of several PD-TH-exmpt files

Hello, sorry to bother you.
I’m the uploader of several files under the PD-TH-exempt tag which have been deleted by you. (File:ศาสตราจารย์คลินิก เกียรติคุณ นายแพทย์ ปิยะสกล สกลสัตยาทร 2562.jpg, File:นายแพทย์ นพพร ชื่นกลิ่น.jpg, File:นายพินิจ จารุสมบัติ.jpg and many more!) I’m quite firmly sure that my files didn’t violate the PD-TH-exempt that given the files “Public domain” status. All of my files uploaded were parts of news published by various Thai government agencies (which could be clearly noted by the domain .go.th in the source links provided). These files deleted were “a part” of “...collection of those in (1) to (4) made by the Ministries, Departments or any other government or local units”; where (1) refers to ”News of the day...”, which according section 7 of the Copyright Act, BE 2537 (1994) are declared public domain. (For further reading, see: template:PD-TH-exempt) The files were also marked with this tag and the author has been included clearly in English. So, why were them deleted? These are clearly not Copyright violation as you stated for deletion.

Should I misunderstand any of the law, please let me know to prevent my further misconduct. Because I’m not entirely sure on my own too.

Thank you :) —Chainwit. (talk) 16:34, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi Chainwit.,

the deleted files had been tagged for copyvio by User:Gunofficial1998.

Let's discuss File:นายแพทย์ นพพร ชื่นกลิ่น.jpg as an example. It is sourced to https://www.senate.go.th/view/122/ภาพข่าวคณะกรรมาธิการ/ภาพ-ข่าวคณะกรรมาธิการ/64/TH-TH. This website is labelled as "ลิขสิทธิ์ © 2560 สำนักงานเลขาธิการวุฒิสภา" and นโยบายเว็บไซต์ (guideline for website use) says rather clearly that you cannot modify the files, which translates to a no-derivatives restricion (which violates our policy COM:L). After a superficial reading of the Template:PD-TH-exempt, I doubt a bit that photographies are covered by "News of the day and facts having the character of mere information which is not a work in literary, scientific or artistic domain". Overall, the copyvio-tagging seemed plausible to me. However, as the coverage of the used template might be of broader importance, I could restore the deleted file and put them together into a regular deletion-request (slow, instead of speedy) to allow for a discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 16:58, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Request

Please undelete Category:Erica walkeri var. praestans - botanical illustrations and move it to Category:Erica walkeria var. praestans - botanical illustrations, in place of the incorrect redirect that is currently at the latter title. Thank you. --R'n'B (talk) 12:35, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

did you discuss this already with User:MILEPRI, who tagged the deleted cat for deletion and created the above mentioned redirect? --Túrelio (talk) 14:26, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

I have left a message for User:MILEPRI on their talk page. --R'n'B (talk) 18:07, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Please see User_talk:MILEPRI#Category_redirect_2. Unfortunately, they do not seem to have understood the gist of my message about the existing broken redirect. --R'n'B (talk) 21:48, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Request

Hi, the author of three pictures on the flicker.com that I saved on Commons, changed the license to (CC BY-SA), so open them again in their original position. Thank you Zemanst (talk) 21:12, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 21:19, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Question about UAA

User:Zhoudongyustudio is suspected of violating en:WP:UAA and has been banned by the Chinese Wiki. Do I still need to report him on Commons?--舞月書生_{𐙼Active at zh.wikipedia, strive to be a good Wikipedian.𔒚} 08:37, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi 舞月書生,

I assume the violation is that he claims to represent "Zhoudongyu studio", when he actually isn't, right? As this would also violate our Commons:Username policy, it might be helpful to report the case on COM:AN. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 08:51, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

I accidentally submitted it to MetaWiki, so I had to wait for it to be processed😭--舞月書生_{𐙼Active at zh.wikipedia, strive to be a good Wikipedian.𔒚} 09:09, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

No problem. I don't think it's very urgent, as he had only 2 uploads so far. --Túrelio (talk) 09:18, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

ok. --舞月書生_{𐙼Active at zh.wikipedia, strive to be a good Wikipedian.𔒚} 09:22, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Category:Victims_of_Islamism

Victims of Islamism has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 02:13, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

STOP...

... to delete my works !!!!

--ComputerHotline (talk) 07:55, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

@ComputerHotline, As I had 100+ deletions today, could you get a bit more specific? --Túrelio (talk) 07:57, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Are your refering to Category:Musique concrète music from Free Music Archive., Category:Field recordings from Free Music Archive or Category:Avant-garde music from Free Music Archive? All 3 categories were requested for deletion by yourself. --Túrelio (talk) 08:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Wereld Kanker Onderzoek Fonds - Er is zoveel te bereiken.webm

Hello Túrelio hoping you are well, I am writing for this edition (diff:419088788). Although the video is in use, I have doubts about whether it really contains anything educational. Seeing the full video, it seems promotional. Unfortunately I have not found any source of it, since the metadata information is practically null. For that reason, he had marked it for Speedy delete. It maybe more convenient to open a deletion request. Kind Regards ℳaʐbeʟ ^{Work • Talk • Mail} 09:17, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi Mazbel,

actually I didn't look into the video. I found the speedy a bit inappropriate as WKOF is an NGO foundation, not a company selling things. So, feel completely free to open a regular DR. --Túrelio (talk) 09:32, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Rimozione foto Massimo Quezel

Salve, ho visto che è stata rimossa la foto dell'autore per il quale ho creato la pagina (Massimo Quezel). Tale foto è stata presa dal sito www.massimoquezel.it ed è stata da me personalmente realizzata, così come il sito. Come posso fare per poterla ripubblicare? Grazie.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ottogiugno (talk • contribs)

Hi Ottogiugno,

I assume you are talking about File:2-1024x685.jpg, right? So, the question is, who really shot this photography?

Anyway, as it was pre-published on said website, the owner of this website needs to send an email from his/her official email address to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (can be in Italiano) in which he/she clarifies who is the photographer and, as it is likely not the depicted person him/herself, whether he/she has obtained enough rights from the photographer to legally release this image under a free license, which allows anybody to use this image. (free license does not mean only Wikipedia can use it)

By the way, the website www.massimoquezel.it contains malware, which tries to infect its visitors. It's the trojan JS/Agent.OEF Trojan. If you work for Massimo Quezel, you should notify him about that.

Regards --Túrelio (talk) 12:09, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Me with my sister. .jpg

Hi, can you please undelete this file? I made a mistake by tagging it as F10, which is not applicable because the uploader has a contribution. I still believe this file should be deleted though (due to COM:DW), but I'd like to give it due process via COM:DR. Thanks! pandakekok9 10:39, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 10:44, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

"uploaded an CC-released by alleged book-author"

Hi Túrelio,

I'd just like to understand your reasoning in undoing this: "image was uploaded an CC-released by alleged book-author". Could you be more specific? Thanks. --217.239.2.172 11:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi, sure. What I meant is that the uploader to the immediate source, i.e. secupedia, Peter Fasold, who released it under CC-BY-SA, is also the author of the book from where the image is sourced, according to the uploader.[17] However, there is still one link missing, which I had initially intended to check on, but then forgot: in the upload-log on secupedia it says "Foto: SIEMENS". I will try to contac Mr. Fasol to ask him whether he really got permission from Siemens company to release the image under CC-BY-SA. --Túrelio (talk) 13:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Ach, ich sehe gerade, dass Du Deutsch als Muttersprache angegeben hast. Das können wir ja vereinfachen. :-)

Ich hatte "Secupedia" für eine kommerzielle Website gehalten und war überhaupt nicht auf die Idee gekommen, dass die Inhalte dort unter CC-Lizenz veröffentlicht sein könnten. Aber jetzt wo Du's sagst... da steht es unten in einer winzigen Zeile.

Die mögliche Siemens-Herkunft des Bildes wäre wohl darüberhinaus noch klärungsbedürftig, das ist wahr. Im Impressum wird die CC-Lizenzierung im Abschnitt "Urheberrecht" ausdrücklich nur auf die Texte bezogen. Es bleibt unklar, was mit den Bildern ist. Gruß, --217.239.2.172 14:03, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Imagenes

• @Túrelio: ¿Puedes aprobar esta imagen por favor?https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pewdiepie_head_shot.jpg --Aurelio de Sandoval (talk)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 15:56, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

@Túrelio: Por favor, ¿Puedes remover el logotipo de Twitter de esta imagen?https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Luis_Cresencio.jpg --Aurelio de Sandoval (talk)

Hmm, I wonder why is there a Twitter logo, when it's from Notimex-TV? In addition, we have Commons:Watermarks#Legal_issues_with_the_removal_of_watermarks. --Túrelio (talk) 15:56, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

@Túrelio: Gracias por su ayuda--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk)

@Túrelio: Por favor ¿Podrías aprobar esta otra imagen https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hugo_L%C3%B3pez_Gatell.png#mw-jump-to-license --Aurelio de Sandoval (talk)

@Túrelio: Por favor, ¿Podría usted resolver estos dos conflictos?https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Jilm0507 --Aurelio de Sandoval (talk)

• @Túrelio: Este segundo conflictos es de un fan art, el usuario afirma que no es un fan art, yo le pedí a @Sanmosa: que me explique, pero no responde, a mi criterio es un fan art, pero me gustaría que usted resolviera este conflicto https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Sakura_Kinomoto_fan_art.jpg --Aurelio de Sandoval (talk)

@Túrelio: En el primer conflicto @Ellin Beltz: alega que los logotipos de México son violaciones a los derechos de autor, pero este usuario desconoce las leyes mexicanas sobre logotipos [Copyright rules by territory] y dice las leyes mexicanas que se pueden subir sin autorización, por favor solucione este conflicto--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk)

Actually, as I understood it, I asked why the logos of various teams were to be considered government works. There is possibly a situation of mistranslation here. I do know that none of the images I remember were initially tagged with the Mexican license - the original question was "own work?" I would request that the discussion calm down a notch; this isn't any type of problem until it gets made into one - it's just another file with a license that needs to be fixed if possible. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:32, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

• Gracias por su atención--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk)

• @Túrelio: Please--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk)

• @Túrelio: Please--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk)

• @Túrelio: Please respond--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk)

• @Ellin Beltz: I have already corrected the license error, I changed it, now please withdraw your complaint.--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk)

• @Ellin Beltz: You withdraw your claim, I have long since corrected the license error--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk)

I don't take orders. The closing administrator will decide. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:53, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

I have just decided to keep those two files. Aurelio de Sandoval: Please stop pinging and asking people to respond each and every day, or you may be blocked for harrassment and disruptive editing. If people do not want to respond to you that is totally fine, and you may not force them to do so. Moreover, this is a voluntary project and our users have many other things do to including a life outside of Commons. De728631 (talk) 17:40, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Sobre los mapas

Buenas tardes, de antemano debes saber que esos mapas son inventados, no tienen referencias, son fuentes primarias, tampoco había comprendido el alcance de las licencias commons que están en idioma inglés, ni tampoco manera de que un bibliotecario a comprenderlo o me ayudase a borrar ese trabajo con copyright. Lo siento busqué pero no supe encontrar ayuda. --1000mil (talk) 15:53, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Una empresa ajena que está aprovechando de este trabajo original, existe un litigio de por medio, estas informado; y repito no está bien explicado el uso de las licencias commons en Wikipedia en las páginas en español. Gracias. Lo siento de nuevo.--1000mil (talk) 07:24, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi 1000mil,

you might add your comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:SAI Wiki 2.png. --Túrelio (talk) 08:18, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Como desees, solo corroboro que estas informado y que la permanencia de las imágenes se debe a tu edición. Muchas gracias. --1000mil (talk) 10:06, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Flickr violation photo should be good now

Hello, I believe the photo you marked in violation of Flickr rules or whatever is now fixed. I think the photo got flagged before the OTRS permission thing went thru. Could you please check it and let me know if it's meeting your standards and if I can use it on a page please. Photo: Geneva, Ohio public library Geneva,_OH_Public_Library.jpg [User:Mackinacbreezer|Mackinacbreezer]] (talk) 22:04, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:14, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Brad Mears USA .jpg

Hi, could you consider undeleting and if necessary raising a DR. This looks like a haphazard use of F10 as this is a notable person and in scope. --Fæ (talk) 06:56, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

 Done. Created a cat for him. --Túrelio (talk) 08:11, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Duplicate request

Hi Túrelio. Can you please delete/redirect the duplicate Geoffrey Howe 2003 (cropped).tif, while moving/saving the 08:20, 19 May 2020 revision of Geoffrey Howe 2003 (cropped).tif to the preferred file? I would like to work on the original revision while attributing the user who originally uploaded the file as a courtesy. Thanks! AlbanGeller (talk) 14:02, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi Alban,

honestly, I have no idea how to achieve that using our scripts/processes. Duplicate-processing the 1st file to the 2nd one, would remove everything of the 1st file. If you want to preserve the upload-log of User:Nick.mon, the 1st file needs to be preserved or be the target (not the source) for the duplicate-process. May be you will find better expertise at COM:VP or COM:AN. --Túrelio (talk) 22:07, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Deletion request

Could this deletion request (Commons:Deletion requests/File:CosmosLaundromatPoster.jpg) be closed please? It's been supported as "Keep." Thanks! StrangeloveFan101 (talk) 20:38, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 21:15, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! StrangeloveFan101 (talk) 21:44, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Another favor

May this DR page be deleted please (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stanley Kubrick in Dr. Strangelove Trailer (4) Cropped.jpg)? Not the file, but the page. I connected the main DR to the cropped file so it would be more simple. Thanks! StrangeloveFan101 (talk) 11:27, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Done by Ellin Beltz already. --Túrelio (talk) 08:58, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Copyright: PatrickSwanson.jpg

Hello! I have a request regarding the image "PatrickSwanson.jpg" that was deleted today. Here is the info on that: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PatrickSwanson.jpg It was deleted because of alleged "Copyright Violation", but I know that this is not the case. The image was cleared by me and aquired directly from the rights holder (OktoTV). It was also cleared with Mr. Swanson, who uses the image on his social media accounts, such as https://twitter.com/patrickswnsn I then uploaded the image here.

I am not sure what the process is, but I am hoping the image can be reinstated. The rights are cleared, in any case. Thank you so much for your help. --Aninvincsum (talk) 12:01, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi Aninvincsum ,

it depends a bit what is understood by "cleared". If it refers to the personality rights of the depicted person, which is also important, but not the issue here. As I understand, none of the directly involved people is the photographer or original rights-holder. So, a permission is needed. If Mr. Swanson has obtained enough rights for this file to release it under a free license, which allows anybody to use it (not Wikipedia-only!), you may prepare a permission by using the text in Commons:Email_templates#Email_message_template_for_release_of_rights_to_a_file, adding the file-name and asking him to sign and date it and send it from his official/business email address to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 12:03, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Delete these, please.

I have uploaded my own photos of information boards at nature reserves and thought it was ok. After contacting the department responsible for these information boards, they expressed the desire not to have images of them outside their own sites. Could you therefore delete the following 7 photos of information boards, uploaded by me.

File:Stockholmsgata2.png

File:LillsjöslåtternInfo.jpg

File:Gammtratten-00138.jpg

File:Ulvsbomuren-01262.jpg

File:Lindsjön-09623.jpg

File:StoraBranden1134.png

File:Marstalla-Naturreservat-838.jpg

Thanks.--SiberianJay (talk) 08:40, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

 Done.--Túrelio (talk) 11:18, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi

I hate to ask anthing directly but please delete this File:Naked teen (49854513936).png ASAP. I understand the uploader does not want to hear my messages that this is not a porn album and with the experience and apolegetic tone exhibited from the first day probably has had some previous experience here. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 21:16, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

 Done.--Túrelio (talk) 11:18, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

About「‪File:Kawamura Yasutaka Bronze statue(side).jpg‬」

This picture,ECHIGOSENNIN myself shot and posted. But,this statue was built by Niigata City in 1993. The creator is also alive. That's why I thought it would be a copyright violation and asked me to withdraw it. Kawamura Yasutaka Bronze statue was taken by my acquaintance and uploaded, and for the same reason I have asked to withdraw it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ECHIGOSENNIN (talk • contribs)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 11:17, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Question

Hi Túrelio, I have a question for you regarding the images up for deletion here. I reached out the photographer to see if he or the UK government owned the copyright work. The picture being used as PM Theresa May's official photograph on the PM's official website is owned by the photographer and not the UK gov't. He said he would send permission... if we pay £350 - which I don't think any of us would do. I would like to send his confirmation email that he does in fact own it incase this comes up again -- how can I do that so it's on file for all administrators? OTRS? Thanks, Corky 17:46, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi Corky,

yes, OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org) is the correct venue for that, as they are accustomed with such issues and are authorized to access non-public records, etc. It might help, if you notify them of the images for which this (non-)permission is relevant. --Túrelio (talk) 18:04, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Awesome, thank you! I will send it and list the images for them. I wasn’t entirely sure if OTRS did this kind of thing, so I appreciate your help! Corky 18:11, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Theresa May.png

Hi Túrelio!

A short time ago I noticed that the image at File:Theresa May.png disappeared from two articles on the Hungarian Wikipedia. I was wondering why that happened, so I clicked through to Commons and saw that you deleted the image with the following summary: "empty •2003:DE:73C:FC8C:99B2:4B50:75AA:6198". It may be my fault, but that does not help me understand the reason for the deletion. The discussion page provides no clues (it was deleted as well). When I check pages linking to File:Theresa May.png I see no deletion discussion pointing to it. So I have three questions to you:

1. What am I doing wrong: how can a user discover the reason for the deletion without contacting you?
2. Could you use more informative summaries when you delete files in the future? (A link to a related discussion is best.)
3. What was the reason for the deletion?

Thank you,

--Malatinszky (talk) 00:12, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi Malatinszky,

the above mentioned filename was just a redirect, which had been empty due to the deletion of the image to which it redirected. For the image-deletion see: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Theresa May in 2016. --Túrelio (talk) 07:21, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for the reply to my third question. I assume the answer to question #1 is that there is no way for a nonadmin user to discover that information because "empty •2003:DE:73C:FC8C:99B2:4B50:75AA:6198" is an not a sufficient summary. I hope the answer to question #2 is that yes, you will use more informative deletion summaries in the future, particularly when you are deleting a file that has dozens of links from dozens of wikis pointing to it.

Best wishes, Malatinszky (talk) 10:45, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

File:MWF and LCA Tejas wind-tunnel scalemodels.jpg

https://www.flickr.com/photos/delhidefencereview/47154439572/in/album-72157689976604003/ For the above file uploaded, I was granted permission to copy & redistribute (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic) by the author.

I have provided the link. I believe this is due to negligence of the reviewer @Túrelio & would like to start an undeletion request. BlehDFI (talk) 08:16, 28 May 2020 (UTC) BlehDFI (talk) 08:19, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi BlehDFI,

per our policy COM:L material licensed only for non-commercial (NC) use is not allowed on Commons. The same is true for no-derivatives restriction. --Túrelio (talk) 08:40, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

ticket:2020053010006426

As regards the Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jacques Chirac, 1974.jpg. Can you review the ticket?  Thank you. AlbanGeller (talk) 22:50, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi Alban, regrettably not, due to lacking access, as I am not OTRS member. You might ask at Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard for help. --Túrelio (talk) 07:56, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

OK have asked the noticeboard for help. On another note, if/when you have time, can you possibly help me with these two COM:HMSR requests? Thanks Túrelio, AlbanGeller (talk) 12:09, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Closing CfDs

I noticed you've recently been deleting a number of spam categories, but left the corresponding CfDs unclosed. I know closing CfDs can be kind of a pain, so I made a gadget that quickly does it that might make your life better: User:BMacZero/QuickCfdClose. I've been using it successfully for a few weeks. – BMacZero (🗩) 16:55, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi BMacZero,

great, thank you. I've imported your script now. --Túrelio (talk) 18:27, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Minneapolis Police Department’s 3th Precinct 2020-05-28.jpg‎

Cher Túrelio, avez-vous la possibilité de renommer le fichier File:20200528- DSC8078 (49948047547).jpg par File:Minneapolis Police Department’s 3th Precinct 2020-05-28.jpg‎ ce qui serait plus explicite. Cordialement, --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 14:09, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 14:54, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Appreciation

Hi dear @Túrelio: , thanks for deleting 6/7 of the requested photos. Please delete the last one as well: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Beer_in_glass_and_ice.jpg Milad Mosapoor 18:59, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:49, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Can u help delete this image?

Hideki Irabu English page now already have free license image, so this image should be deleted. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hideki_Irabu.jpg佾珜 (talk) 00:01, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi 佾珜,

the above linked fair-use-image is stored on :en Wikipedia. I have no control over :en, you need to ask them to consider deletion, as it is no longer in use. --Túrelio (talk) 08:49, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Geoffrey Howe.jpg

Hi Túrelio. Can you possibly restore the two most recent versions of this file you deleted as a {{Dup}}? (I'd like to request a merge of the versions into the file history of this file over at COM:HMSR.) AlbanGeller (talk) 00:15, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:46, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

File

Hi, can you please check my upload? This is my first time on Commons and i don't know very well how to do. This is the file: File:Menconico - chiesa di San Giorgio Martire.png. Thank you --HominisCon (talk) 20:28, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi HominisCon,

welcome to Commons. You didn't choose the easiest for your first task here. I have simplified the description template. Cropping, what you did with the original image, is not considered a "creative" work. So, one does not get own copyright by that. Therefore, I've removed the "own work" and you as author, but mentioned you behind the original photographer. --Túrelio (talk) 20:38, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for the help :) I'm a rollbacker on it.wiki but images have never been my strong point, so I'm trying :) Is there any manual i can read about this? Thank you, good evening :) --HominisCon (talk) 20:46, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

See Commons:Contributing your own work for a short introduction. --Túrelio (talk) 20:49, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Request for deletion

Hi! Can you delete this file? Because security concern (my real name). Thanks in advance! --Johnstad ^Почта 11:14, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

 Done, already by my colleague Gbawden. --Túrelio (talk) 12:10, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Re: deletion

Hello. The file was nominated for speedy deletion because there is a doxxing spree going around right now against the Indonesian wikipedia community regarding communism topics so I was hoping to get this deleted rapidly to avoid any misunderstandings. Thank you. RXerself (talk) 11:29, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi, yes, I became aware of this problem already yesterday, after another user asked for privacy-deletions. In such cases, it might be better to directly (email) contact admins or, even better, oversighters. --Túrelio (talk) 12:13, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Kelby Tomlinson 2 images all violation pls help delete

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kelby_Tomlinson_Inside_the_Park_HR.jpg

And

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tomlinson_Walkoff_Single.jpg

Both of them all came from this (gettyimage): https://www.sfgate.com/giants/article/Giants-beat-Cardinals-on-Kelby-Tomlinson-s-6472848.php

Pls help delete them😢佾珜 (talk) 00:10, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for notifying. However, every user can tag an image for suspicion of copyvio. Just use the "copyvio-link" in the toolbox on the left side of each image-page. --Túrelio (talk) 08:02, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Zee cine awards

Hi! Can you upload the picture in Vani Bhojan at zee cine awards image. She has one picture but she has more Wikipedia's page so that you upload the picture in Vani Bhojan. Susenaes (talk) 08:41, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

why don't you do this by yourself? --Túrelio (talk) 08:43, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

I don't have image. Please upload. I hope you upload the picture in Vani Bhojan. Susenaes (talk) 08:47, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Why do you think that I have this image? I have no idea about what you are talking. --Túrelio (talk) 08:49, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

You don't have image? Susenaes (talk) 08:51, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

I don't know "Vani Bhojan" and I don't know "zee cine awards". Why do you even think that I have any relation/knowledge about this? --Túrelio (talk) 08:59, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Sorry Susenaes (talk) 08:55, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Can you reply me? Please Susenaes (talk) 08:58, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Sorry Susenaes (talk) 09:02, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

en: Vani Bhojan please check and upload please Susenaes (talk) 02:02, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

https://www.99images.com/celebrations/zee-cine-awards/zee-cine-awards-tamil-2020-event-hd-photos-tocxh/218202 this image Susenaes (talk) 04:40, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

No and No. 1) The source-site is "© 2020 All rights reserved." and they expressedly state that they don't have a license for that image, which translates to that they use it under "fair use" clause, which is not allowed on Commons. 2) If the image would be under a free license, you could upload it by yourself. --Túrelio (talk) 07:25, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Vani Bhojan freely licensed image please upload Susenaes (talk) 09:35, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

1) No, not true. 2) And for the last time, it's not my duty to upload images. Every registered user can upload images to Commons, provided they are evidently under a free license. If you want to use/have an image on a project, then do upload it by yourself. EOD. --Túrelio (talk) 10:25, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Dongdaemun Stadium 2005 01.jpg

These file is not apparent copyright violation. There is no direct link to the photo, so you need to check the license through the collection link that contains the photo. Access this site, and click on any photo. You can check the license of the picture you clicked on. These file is freely licensed. Thanks. — parrot 00:04, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

I had done this and didn't find any license statement. The site (http://data.si.re.kr/) itself is "Copyright 2015 SI, All Rights Reserved." I repeated it with your URL and nothing happens when clicking on the thumbnail of the image. In addition, the site seems to prevent using Google on-site translation, which creates an additional burden to translate anything from it. I can restore oit and put it into a regular DR, so you you can provide the required evidence for the claimed license. --Túrelio (talk) 07:37, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

File:J. Mostaert - Diptiek met portretten van Adriaen van der Broucke en Catharina Vranx - 1953.0072* - Delft Municipal Museums.jpg and

If File:J. Mostaert - Diptiek met portretten van Adriaen van der Broucke en Catharina Vranx - 1953.0072* - Delft Municipal Museums.jpg (1,428 × 1,772 pixels) and File:Van den Broucke-Vranx Diptych 002.jpg (1 200 × 1 489 pixels) are identical, shouldn't the first one be the one kept as has more resolution? Tm (talk) 13:00, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

I assume that Lotje tagged them the way he did, as the now deleted one was uploaded 9 years after the other one and that the difference in resolution wasn't that big. The latter was also my thinking, after comparing the visually for quality differences, which I didn't observe. I can revert the merging, if you prefer. --Túrelio (talk) 13:25, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Aissata Diallo.jpg

Hi, please undelete my picture. It is an original picture taken by me, as stated when I first uploaded it.--Likeabite (talk) 16:02, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi, sorry, it was published far earlier at https://twitter.com/aissatatdiallo/status/1158807945246859265. So, if you insist on "own work", you need to go to COM:UDR, as you have done already. --Túrelio (talk) 16:06, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Favor

Hello Túrelio, could you analyze these contribuitions? The account was locked on the Portuguese-Wikipedia. The account destroys the structure (layout) of the pages and appears to be carrying logos without a license to place them on Wikipedia. Conde Edmond Dantès (talk) 19:10, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi Conde Edmond Dantès, taken care of. Most logos seem to be copyvios; a few might be too simple to be copyrightable. --Túrelio (talk) 19:34, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio, thanks for the answer. I understand the placement, as I am uploading some simplified files. However, some files loaded by the source appear to be simply copied, for example: Globoplay, GloboEsporte (simplified) and CAOA. I requested a second opinion since I am not fully aware of the licenses. Conde Edmond Dantès (talk) 22:49, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

About my image envolving "Zoom"

Hi there, Turélio!

I see you deleted my image "História via Zoom" yesterday, under the assumption that it was a print screen of the videocalling service, that is of course, non free. Actually, the image did not use the Zoom program and is not a screenshot.

The work is actually a derivative work made by me using exclusevely portraits of brazilian historians that are under public domain, taken directly from Commons, that used two digital tools to emulate a video call and the "glitch art" effect. The programs, as mentioned on the caption of the image, are "Kapwing" and "PHOTOMOSH", both free.

I understand the reason for the confusion, but i would kindly ask you to reconsider the elimination, or at least giving me a reason other than it being a screenshot (as it isn't one). --Pedro Toniazzo Terres (talk) 14:46, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi Pedro, o.k. I can restore the image, provided that you add links to the used images. Instead of {{Own}} use {{Derived from | Image1.jpg | Image2.jpg | Image3.jpg | Image4.jpg}} .--Túrelio (talk) 18:52, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Wendingen

Sorry for the confusion. I was wrong. These are no duplicate files as you can see if you compare it. Please stop deleting these files. Thank you. With kind regards. Waterborough (talk) 20:50, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Ok, then you should remove the dupe-template from File:Wendingen Series 02 No. 01.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 20:52, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

---

I apologize if I inadvertently published someone's email address. I am bewildered as to why, after weeks of back and forth with administrators and extensive documentation of approval under the Creative Commons licensing, someone (?) deleted the outstanding photos (for which there were releases for each one) from Puppets Against AIDS. Gary Friedman, the creator of Puppets Against AIDS, says he owns the copyright and submitted lots of documentation to release the photos; the photos were taken by a person who is no longer living, so Wikimedia required a release from the heir, which was submitted and approved. The photos were fully approved by Wikimedia. Why were they deleted?????? Marcywinograd (talk) 21:44, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

I can look into that, but you need to post the filenames. --Túrelio (talk) 22:47, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Deceased wikipedian

I was searching for some guidance on how to deal with deceased userpage as I found out that User:Jack Child died in 2011 but only discovered that now per [this webpage https://www.american.edu/americantoday/campus-news/20110621-jack-child.cfm] which I would regard as a reliable source. I notice the enwiki even protects their pages. Ww2censor (talk) 17:18, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi Ww2censor,

thanks for notifying. I've protected his userpage and added him to the to-add-list for our COM:RIP-page. --Túrelio (talk) 17:22, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Question about a deleted photo

Hi! Yesterday you deleted Gheorghe Tabacovici photo. This picture is my property and I agreed to post it on Wikimedia. The question is: where is my fault? What have I missed? I'm begginer on wiki so I want to learn to do all well. Horatiu Mavrodin (talk) 09:57, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi Horatiu,

question is: what do you mean by "my property"? As the depicted person died in 1947, the photography must have been taken before 1947. Are you that old? Copyright for a photography (or any work of art) is with the photographer (or artist). In most countries of the world, copyright lasts til 70 years after the death of the artist/photographer. When you have a photo-print or even the original in your possession, but are not the original photographer, you do not have the right to reproduce and distribute it. --Túrelio (talk) 12:10, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Your Deletions

Note: the below was originally posted at Commons talk:General disclaimer, I have moved it here as it seems a more relevant forum. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:58, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

• 06:45, 12 June 2020 Túrelio talk contribs deleted page File:JS31763681.jpg (Copyright violation: previously published elsewhere, labelled 'Copyright Nora Summers/Jeff Towns Dylans Bookstore') (thank) (global usage; delinker log)
• 06:45, 12 June 2020 Túrelio talk contribs deleted page File:Dylan Thomas & Family Laugharne 1953.jpg (Copyright violation: previously published elsewhere) (thank) (global usage; delinker log)
• 06:44, 12 June 2020 Túrelio talk contribs deleted page File:JS31763730.jpg (Copyright violation: previously published elsewhere, labelled 'Copyright Nora Summers/Jeff Towns Dylans Bookstore') (thank) (global usage; delinker log)
• 06:44, 12 June 2020 Túrelio talk contribs deleted page File:JS31496952.jpg (Copyright violation: previously published elsewhere) (thank) (global usage; delinker log)

You're a busy bee for sure - may I ask what brought my image uploads above to your attention? (one of which seems to have been restored to the reverted article) Sirjohnperrot (talk) 14:15, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi Sirjohnperrot,

all above listed files had been copyvio-tagged by User:Verbcatcher and were therefore listed in the copyvio-queue for speedy deletion (Category:Copyright violations), which is for us admins the most urgent queue, for legal reasons. Of course, when a user tags a file as "copyvio", that's not a court-verdict, but just a suspicion. Therefore, admins don't delete these files blindly, but try to make their own judgement. WRT your files, they show obviously old photos, but not as old as to assume to be in the public domain. However, you had dated them as from 2020 and claimed them as own work, which I found very unlikely. May be you created reproductions of old photo-prints. However, then the copyright is still not with you, if you didn't shoot the original photographies. Of course, if one of my assumptions is wrong, I am open for discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 18:25, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation that's very helpful The information supplied by me was clearly an error, I thought I was taking responsobility for any copyright issues and was not trying to pass them off as my own work - sorry about that. I've only uploaded a handful of images and made the same mistake with all of them. I've contacted the copyright holder for the 2 Dylan Thomas images deleted from his article asking for permission to use them in Wikipedia. The parish map on the Laugharne talk page was uploaded by me on to Wikitree and before that was my photo of an endpaper in a public domain book. If I get the necessary permissions for the Thomas images (which I've just found out are all online in the National Portrait Gallery) I'll put them back for the reasons given on the Talk Page.Sirjohnperrot (talk) 22:07, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Sirjohnperrot, be aware that "permission to use them in Wikipedia" is not sufficient for them to be uploaded to Commons - all media up here must be freely licensed, which means that anyone can use it for any purpose, including commercially or making derivatives. Further when you say "public domain book" do you mean a book which has been published, or a book which is old enough that it has fallen into the public domain? -mattbuck (Talk) 08:58, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Christine Keeler op weg naar het gerechtsgebouw, Bestanddeelnr (retouched).jpg

Hi Túrelio. Please can you (temporarily) restore this file? Thanks! AlbanGeller (talk) 19:29, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Can you restore this file also? (I'm planning to request a version merge.) AlbanGeller (talk) 19:52, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

@Alban, you meant to restore the deleted and redirected file, right? --Túrelio (talk) 20:51, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Yes. Since the deleted/redirected files are linked in the archives of COM:GL/P, I think they should be merged into the file version history of the files they were redirected to. AlbanGeller (talk) 21:16, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

 Done for the first. But with the 2nd it's complicated, as after my redirect to File:Elizabeth Douglas-Home.jpg, the latter was moved to File:Elizabeth Douglas-Home (retouched) 2.jpg. So, for File:Lord Home in Holland. Met echtgenote arriveerde hij op Ypenburg. Lord Home zijn , Bestanddeelnr 915-3602 (cropped).jpg there is nothing to restore. --Túrelio (talk) 21:33, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. Is there anything to restore for Elizabeth Douglas-Home.jpg? AlbanGeller (talk) 21:39, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Yes, possible.  Done --Túrelio (talk) 21:41, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Raja Atizaz Ahmed Kiyani (talk · contribs)

I notice that you deleted most of @Raja Atizaz Ahmed Kiyani’s uploads after they admitted that they were uploaded without permission. However, one of their uploads remains. Is there a reason for this? Brianjd (talk) 07:47, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

 Done, it hadn't been tagged. --Túrelio (talk) 08:37, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks @Brianjd for raising your voice about that image too. I almost forgot. There is no reason that you might be interested in.Raja Atizaz Ahmed Kiyani (talk) 11:40, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Question about a deleted photo

Hi, thank you for you consideration. but you deleted the image that it's rights belongs to me. I took that picture from mr. seyed saeid rahmani and let him to use the picture for his official site and I use that for a wikipedia page and I let to all for using that in general. so is this explanation convincing? if yes I will be very pleased if you recovered the picture which the link is: (https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Seyed_saeid_rahmani.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1) or let me upload it again. and help me that can I use this tag for it : {{PD-self}} thank you so much for your consideration سیاوش آریان (talk) 08:41, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

hmm. But how fits that to your source-entry "از سایت شخصی سید سعید رحمانی" (taken from the personal site of Seyed Saeed Rahmani) and your author-entry "Seyed Saeed Rahmani"? Also, the low resolution is typical for an image grabbed from a website and not one shot by yourself. If you did shoot it by yourself, upload the full-resolution version as proof (can be deleted thereafter). Also, you were notified of the missing licens on June 3rd, but didn't do anything. --Túrelio (talk) 08:44, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

thank you... and so sorry, my mistake... I should explain completely... yes, I did shoot it and some more... as your request, I upload full-resolution the picture and I can send some more with different pose of that situation, if you want. and excuse me for missing the notice on June 3rd. and should I upload in the same link? (if yes, I did it) سیاوش آریان (talk) 09:03, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi سیاوش آریان,

ok. Accepted. Now, du you want to high-resolution version remain? If you don't want, you could either re-upload it with reduced size or re-upload your initial cropped version. I can thereafter delete the high-res version. --Túrelio (talk) 09:53, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

thank you so much... yes, the high-resolution version can be remain. سیاوش آریان (talk) 10:16, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Löschanträge ...

Hallo! Danke für die Bearbeitung meiner ersten Löschanträge. Bei den eher simplen Bildern kann ich die Umwandlung in einen normalen Löschantrag verstehen. Bei den anderen wäre eine explizite, kostenpflichtige Genehmigung vor der Aufnahme erforderlich gewesen. Die habe ich angesichts der Art des Aufenthalts (privater Besuch) nicht eingeholt. Eine kommerzielle Verwendung ist aber leider ausgeschlossen und ich hatte es beim Upload leider nicht berücksichtigt. Manchmal passiert mir das leider, vor allem dann, wenn man nicht erwartet, dass dort ein solcher Ausschluss vorliegen könnte. Ich kann mich nur für den daraus erzeugten Aufwand entschuldigen. --XRay ^talk 07:17, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi XRay, der Aufwand ist nicht das Problem, sondern dass die Bilder hier seit 2018 liegen und inzwischen von anderen extern genutzt werden könnten. Hast du eine Abmahnung oder Warnung von Hausherrn erhalten? (falls ja, brauchst du nicht unbedingt zu antworten; es wäre aber ratsam, das Faktum an OTRS zu schicken, weil es die Löschung unter dem Ticket vereinfachen/beschleunigen könnte). --Túrelio (talk) 07:29, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Ich habe dir eine Mail geschickt. --XRay ^talk 07:43, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Vielen Dank! Ich hoffe, dass uns Fotografinnen und Fotografen das Leben irgendwann leichter gemacht wird. Gefühlt ist das für mich immer ein Dämpfer, zumal ich nur manche Gründe nachvollziehen kann. Es gibt hier regional bei uns manche fragwürdigen Vorfälle, manchmal kann ich sogar beide Seiten verstehen. Es gibt hier ein schönes Schloss. Als ich an einem Wochenende dort quasi gleichzeitig 6 Hochzeitsfotoshootings gesehen hatte, waren mir die Beweggründe des Besitzers klar. Es ist aber immer etwas anderes, ob ich einen Ort für ein Fotoshooting oder einen Filmdreh verwende oder dort nur normale Aufnahmen mache. Wie gesagt, vielen Dank! --XRay ^talk 13:49, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Du kannst diese Fotos ja z.B. auf Flickr unter NC hochladen, damit sie nicht ganz in der "Schublade" verschwinden müsssen. --Túrelio (talk) 13:51, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Peinlich, aber ich habe zwei Bilder vergessen. Kannst du sie bitte auch löschen: File:Würzburg, Residenz -- 2018 -- 0171.jpg und File:Würzburg, Residenz -- 2018 -- 0194.jpg. Könntest du die bitte auch löschen. Danke! -- Es müsste bei Wikimedia Commons einen Bereich geben, in dem man manche Bilder "on hold" hochladen könnte. --XRay ^talk 13:54, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Bundesratsfoto 2020.jpg

Hi Túrelio

You've deleted the above image recently. I don't know what license was specified there, but it should have been the same as with File:Bundesrat_der_Schweiz_2012.jpg. Those official press pictures have a free license. --PaterMcFly (talk) 13:55, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Should be a OTRS ticket: https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketNumber=2016030410008521

Otherwise all other in Category:Official_Swiss-Federal-Council_photographs must also be deleted too. --Filzstift (talk) 14:00, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Hallo zusammen,

das gen. Foto war Ende 2019 von User:Fonero hochgeladen worden. Als Quelle war [18] angegeben, auf der ausdrücklich steht "Für den privaten Gebrauch, für nicht-kommerzielle Publikationen und für Lehrmittel stehen die Bundesratsfotos zur freien Nutzung zur Verfügung. Für kommerzielle Zwecke darf das Bundesratsfoto nicht verwendet werden, auch nicht in verfremdeter Form."

Am Tag des Uploads war {{Parlament.ch}} als Lizenz angegeben. 1 Tag später hat der Hochlader selbst diesen Baustein entfernt, womit das Foto keine Lizenz mehr hatte. Dies ist erstaunlicherweise erst knapp 5 Monate später (!) einem Bot aufgefallen. Weitere 3 Wochen später hat sich User:Andel offenbar die Quelle angeschaut und die Datei entsprechend der NC-Einschränkung zur Schnelllöschung markiert, die ich dann ausgeführt habe. Ein OTRS-Ticket trug die Datei zu keinem Zeitpunkt.

Wenn ihr euch absolut sicher seid, dass das Foto trotz der Angaben auf der Quelle unter das erwähnte OTRS-Ticket (habe selbst keinen Zugang) fällt, kann ich es wiederherstellen. --Túrelio (talk) 15:17, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Ich kenne den Inhalt des OTRS-Tickets auch nicht, aber wenn jener in den Bausteinen, die den anderen Bundesratsfotos angefügt ist, richtig wiedergegeben ist, dann müsste das auf jeden Fall passen. Hier wurde das u.a. thematisiert, wobei der Thread schon älter ist und ohne richtige Antwort abbricht. --PaterMcFly (talk) 15:28, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

siehe: Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#OTRS_ticket_2016030410008521. --Túrelio (talk) 15:42, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Sieht schlecht aus nach der ersten Rückmeldung, weil die Quelle admin.ch nicht passt. --Túrelio (talk) 17:02, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Please restore deleted file

This is the link to deleted file. Now the source has the license https://bike.org.by/news/brest/brest-trails-2 Vitaly Zdanevich (talk) 09:26, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

 Done, but you need to adapt the license-template. --Túrelio (talk) 12:12, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

What was uploaded first?

File:Gwen Stefani, No Doubt (17193486371).jpg ‎uploaded in 22:08, 21 August 2019) or File:Gwen Stefani, No Doubt (16986656777).jpg uploaded in 22:08, 21 August 2019 or File:Gwen Stefani, No Doubt (17193486371).jpg uploaded in 22:08, 21 August 2019 were the duplicates of File:Gwen Stefani, No Doubt (crop 1).jpg or File:Gwen Stefani of No Doubt performing at Global Citizen Earth Day 2015 in Washington DC (cropped).jpg, uploaded today? Please undelete the original ones and redirect the real duplicates. Thanks. Tm (talk) 13:18, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:57, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

 Comment Thanks for your quick and positive answer. Just to inform you that A1Cafel did this not by mistake, as he tried to do the same 15 days ago. Tm (talk) 21:00, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Arquivo deletado - File:Alexandre Arraes.jpg

Olá,

Bom dia!

Dias atrás eu havia pedido a deleção da foto File:Alexandre Arraes.jpg por pensar que eu havia escolhido o arquivo errado. Contudo o arquivo estava correto, somente a descrição da licença estava errada. A foto é pública e foi retirada de um site de um órgão do governo brasileiro. http://www.camara.rj.gov.br/vereador_informacoes.php?m1=inform&cvd=327&np=AlexandreArraes&nome_politico=Alexandre%20Arraes

A personalidade da foto é uma figura pública e foi postado em um site público e pelas leis brasileiras, trata-se de um documento publico. Sendo assim, peço que a deleção seja retirada e também gostaria de instruções para corrigir este tipo de problema.

Grato pela atenção.

--Outputsistemas (talk) 14:36, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello,

Good Morning!

Days ago I had asked to delete the photo File: Alexandre Arraes.jpg because I thought I had chosen the wrong file. However the file was correct, only the license description was wrong. The photo is public and was taken from a website of a Brazilian government agency. http://www.camara.rj.gov.br/vereador_informacoes.php?m1=inform&cvd=327&np=AlexandreArraes&nome_politico=Alexandre%20Arraes

The personality of the photo is a public figure and was posted on a public website and under Brazilian law, it is a public document. Therefore, I ask that the deletion be removed and I would also like instructions to correct this type of problem.

Grateful for the attention --Outputsistemas (talk) 14:39, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi Outputsistemas,

I see you have re-uploaded the image. Someone else has requested it for deletion. Please add your above comment at the deletion-discussion: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alexandre Arraes.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 19:43, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Delete

Hello, You just deleted the seal images and would like to know why?

Thank you. HxdeB (talk) 02:20, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi HxdeB,

as already stated in the messages on your talkpage, these images were not own work (but copied from Archive du Royaume de Belgique) AND they were reproductions of a 3D object. The {{PD-Art}} concept is only valid for 2D reproductions. So, before uploading such images to Commons, you need to obtain a permission/license from the original photographer or go to the museum and take the shots by yourself. --Túrelio (talk) 07:20, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Q

Hi Túrelio You deleted my photo About wise child courses for children I wanted to know the reason for this thank you With respect — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amirh.w61 (talk • contribs)

Hi Amirh.w61,

just to be sure, as I don't read Arabic language, do you mean these images File:دوره ششم از دوره های «کودک حکیم» که برپایه حکمت اشراق سهروردی شکل گرفته اند.jpg or File:دوره ششم از دوره های «کودک حکیم» که برپایه حکمت اشراق سهروردی شکل گرفته است.jpg?

If yes, these images carried the Facebook/Instagram code in its metadata and had the typical Facebook size; so, it was highly suspected to have been copied from Facebook. --Túrelio (talk) 07:13, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Redirect deletion

Hi, could you please delete this, so I can move a file to its correct name? Thanks! :) Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 18:34, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

yes, however, it is currently used on 2 pages on it.wikibooks.org. You need to restore it there. --Túrelio (talk) 18:44, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

album covers

Bonjour,

à peine téléchargé nos 3 images on étaient effacées. car nous violons le copyright. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:V_Pochette_Album_42.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:V_Pochette_Album_Made_In_Silence.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:V_Pochette_Album_L%C3%A0_o%C3%B9_les_maux_nous_laissent.jpg

Mais nous sommes propriétaire des ces images et nous violons aucun copyright. Pouvez vous les restaurer et les autoriser ?

Nous avons envoyé un mail à permissions-commons@wikimedia.org sous le ticket [Ticket#: 2020061910004082]

Merci d'avance

--Gabyvbsp (talk) 10:24, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

 Done and OTRS-tagged. --Túrelio (talk) 10:54, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Restoring previous file name

Hello, I wanted to restore the previous name of this file in spite of correct description of the file. I tried using page move but it seems can't be done by filemovers due to the name already used. As an administrator, could you do me a favor? Thanks in advance for your help. オーバードライブ83 (talk) 14:18, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 17:43, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyright Watcher Barnstar
	Thanks for deleting that stolen photo. 1+1=thirteen (talk) 14:43, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Can you delete a file

I uploaded a file because the source said I could use it but I don't think they knew about the license.

File:ABC Railway train.jpg

the file

I messed up, LOL --1+1=thirteen (talk) 15:08, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 21:24, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Autumn Never Dies Poster

Hi. I noticed you just marked https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Autumn_Never_Dies_Poster.jpg as a copyright violation. The necessary permissions have just been emailed in. TheSCMFiles (talk) 21:33, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi TheSCMFiles,

the image has already been deleted by a colleague. However, when the OTRS-agent, who works on said permission, has them validated, drop me a note or tell him to drop me a note, so I can restore the image. --Túrelio (talk) 09:02, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Problem

Hi Turelio!! Please see File:Mary Gaylord Mclean and The Five gaited Mare, "According to Lynn" (3930800948).jpg and File:Mary Gaylord Mclean and The Five gaited Mare, "According to Lynn" (3930800948) (cropped).jpg - the photog has decided after 3 years to delete these images. The cropped one was a speedy so I changed it to regular delete. Now someone is trying to delete the main file. Thanks in advance - ^Atsme _Talk 📧 23:47, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

They are only part of a larger issue, as the user has requested all his uploads for deletion; see Commons:Deletion requests/User:Abounaderphoto. --Túrelio (talk) 09:05, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

MS Dhoni photo

I see you redirected File:MS Dhoni helicopter Shot.jpg to File:MS Dhoni batting.jpg. I've reverted a change to the target (which seemed to go against COM:OVERWRITE) so it no longer matches the composite photo that you redirected. I'm not sure if I've done the right thing, or how to undo your redirect. I see that there are concerns about the composite image anyway, but it's deletion request should stand on its own, separate to the target file. Apologies if I've messed things up! Spike 'em (talk) 15:14, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

The blue collage was copyvio-suspected anyway. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 15:22, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Deletion of mindtree logo

Hello, I noticed that you deleted a logo that I had uploaded for the purpose of adding to a wikipedia article of a company. As per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Logos I decided that since there is no free logo for the company in question as logos are by default copyrighted, I could use a logo from their official website. I am new to wikipedia so I would not be surprised if this isn't the precedence. If this is the case, may I ask how I could go about adding a logo to said wikipedia article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Debitpixie (talk • contribs)

Hi Debitpixie,

you have triggered the deletion of File:Mindtree-logo-tagline-JPEG.jpg by yourself by adding the fair-use-template. For legal reasons (U.S. copyright law), fair-use material cannot be hosted on Commons, but must be hosted on the local project, provided it has an exemption policy, as :en has (en:Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline). --Túrelio (talk) 15:27, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Del file ord source

Refer to the case: File:Rangsiman Rome in 2019.jpg, File:Srinon Bunluae in 2019.jpg, and File:Wan Ubamloonk in 2019.jpg it have source คลังทรัพยากรศึกษาแบบเปิด (Open data source for Education) of Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn. it free to share in Thailand and Photographer Peak hora He allowed to use pictures. If you stick to your reasoning. why you don't delete this file: [Rama X official.png]. Please recover file. --ร้อยตรี โชคดี (talk) 04:41, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

For all of the deleted 3 images, at the source there is a license note below the image, which shows that it has a Commons-non-compliant CC-BY-NC license, see for example. File:King_Rama_X_official.png is different, as the license note below the image says CC-BY. So, obviously this source-site uses different licenses. If you disagree, file a undeletion-request at Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests. --Túrelio (talk) 07:19, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Please undo the deletion

Please undo the deletion of the Category:Photographs by Adrienne Horváth (ballerina). I do not know that on what basis did @Auntof6: removed this category and put it in the Category:Adrienne Horváth (ballerina) by the picture of Enikő Somorjai was taken by Adrienne Horváth, who is a ballerina and photographer?!......... Please restore it as it was. Thank you, if..! Fauvirt (talk) 23:02, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) This may have happened if the category was in Category:Photographs of women by name, which I was working on at the time. If this category was for photographs taken by the ballerina (rather than photographs of the ballerina), then I apologize for not noticing that it was either miscategorized or not what I thought it was. If Túrelio wants to recreate the category, I would be happy to make sure it's categorized correctly and go back to my edit history and put back the files I moved (fortunately, Cat-a-lot allows categorizing from edit history, so that would be easy to do). --Auntof6 (talk) 00:26, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

@Fauvirt, @Auntof6, I've restored the cat incl. its history. Peacefully agree on a solution :-) . --Túrelio (talk) 06:54, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you both for your cooperation! I have already put the picture back. :o) Fauvirt (talk) 09:31, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

File:2020-06 Beringtes Kronwickenwidderchen (01).jpg at al.

Haie Túrelio,

thx for taking care of my files. I wonder if its necessary and good to have redirects. The name of the files is wrong (it a different insect) so the redirect is misleading. The files have been online only 1 or 2 days and were not used in any articles - only on de on a page to check if the name is correct. ... So IMO its better to not have any redirects. Maybe you reconsider your decision ...Sicherlich ^talk 07:52, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Sicherlich,

die Erstellung eines Redir beim Löschen von Duplikaten ist keine bewusste Entscheidung, sondern resultiert automatisch aus dem Einsatz des Duplikat-Bearbeitungsskripts. Der Grund dürfte vermutlich darin liegen, dass der bei der Dateinamensänderung benutzter Dateien aktivierte Bot offenbar nicht auf allen Projekten oder auf allen Seiten den befohlenen Namensaustausch vornehmen kann. Jedenfalls finde ich beim zum Löschen markierten Redir-Dateien immer wieder mal noch bestehenden Nutzungen, bei den der Dateinamen nicht ausgetauscht wurde, was ich dann manuell machen muss. Wenn hier kein Redir bestehen würde, ginge diese Nutzung kaputt. --Túrelio (talk) 08:03, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

In dem Fall IMO schlecht, wegen klar irreführend. aber die technik gewinnt und ichs kanns nicht ändern. ... Danke trotzdem ;) ...Sicherlich ^talk 08:12, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Nepal maps

Hi Túrelio, please see also File:Nepal 1M N LD.jpg and File:New Official Map of Nepal.png, which I tagged for deletion before I found out how to use CSD. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 08:13, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Duplicate file

Hi, admin. Can duplicate markup be used for files in different formats? Larryasou (talk) 10:12, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi, depends. In general: TIF -> JPEG, no; SVG -> JPEG, no. But even with these, it depends on the individual circumstances. --Túrelio (talk) 10:38, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

How about this case File:Logo lavoixdunord.jpg? I noticed it was tagged with duplicate and then deleted. Should this file considered as a duplicate？ --Larryasou (talk) 11:04, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

That was a deletion-request I hesitated a day to execute it. The nominator likely meant, that the former uses of the now deleted file, had been replaced by File:La Voix du Nord wordmark.svg, though they are not visual duplicates. However, as the deleted version was unused and rather simple, I've finally deleted it. But that wasn't a decision carved in stone. (File format wasn't relevant here) --Túrelio (talk) 12:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

All right, thanks for your answers! Larryasou (talk) 13:26, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Meghan Trainor in 2020.png

Hi, I pinged you at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Meghan Trainor in 2020.png but it may not have gone through. An IP has created a bogus nomination for this file which may affect its FAC image review. Please help?—MaranoFan (talk) 20:47, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 21:14, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Student photo

Hi, the picture you are tagging as "copyvio" was taken by me in april of 2020, at the time I didnt have my charger cable to upload the file first into my computer and then uploaded here, so what I did was to sent the picture to a messenger chat of one of my friends on 24 april and then only save it to my computer, thats the reason why it has low resolution, I have the screenshot of the picture chat, if you want me to sent it to you let me now. This file was taken and done by me. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 22:15, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi TheBellaTwins1445,

it seems you misunderstood the chain of events. Your image had been tagged by somebody else for speedy-deletion due to copyvio-suspicion. I've converted the speedy-request to a regular deletion-discussion as I found the evidence for copyvio insufficient. So, you don't need to convince me. --Túrelio (talk) 08:34, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

My bad, sorry, but I guess you can help here too right? I already sent a message to commons by e-mail providing them the screenshot of the conversation in which I sent my pics on 24 april, this page provided here is just using the file, and there is no problem since its under CC by me, but I am the official owner of it anyways. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 14:55, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Löschung Portraitfoto

Hallo Túrelio,

du hast mir bezüglich File:Porträtfoto Jutta Ströter-Bender 2013 - Kopie.jpg eine Nachricht geschrieben. Ich bin gerade etwas ratlos. Prof. Ströter-Bender möchte dieses Foto nicht mehr benutzen, sondern ein anderes Profilbild (das ich heute hochgeladen habe). Wie kann ich denn jetzt hier vorgehen? Zusätzlich kann dir Prof. Ströter-Bender eine Email senden, in der sie meine Anfrage bestätigt, wenn es notwendig sein sollte.

Vielen Dank,

MuKo2013MuKo2013 (talk) 00:42, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi MuKo2013,

zunächst einmal kannst auf den Projekt-Seiten, auf denen dieses Foto derzeit genutzt wird, vorschlagen, es durch das bevorzugte Foto File:PortaitStröterBender.jpg zu ersetzen. Wenn es dann keine Nutzungen mehr gibt, kannst du einen regulären Löschantrag stellen, also keinen Schnelllöschantrag, wie du es getan hattest. Dann wird über den Antrag diskutiert und irgendwann entscheidet ein Admin darüber.--Túrelio (talk) 08:32, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio,

wie kann ich meinen Vorschlag auf die jeweilige Projektseite schreiben? Über "Talk"? D.h. zuerst muss auf den entsprechenden Projektseiten das alte Portraitfoto durch das neue ersetzt werden, damit ich einen regulären Löschantrag stellen kann?

Danke für deine Hilfe! MuKo2013MuKo2013 (talk) 15:49, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Genau. Auf Talk bzw. Diskussion. Wenn sich nach ein paar Tagen keiner gemeldet hat, tausch das Bild einfach aus. --Túrelio (talk) 16:36, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Where do I upload fair use pictures for use on Wikipedia?

Hello, I noticed that you speedy deleted a logo I uploaded, can you point me in the direction of where I could upload it under fair use for Wikipedia. Apologies for the mistake - I am a new editor. --Wurbl (talk) 09:58, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Fair-use material needs to be uploaded locally, at the project, where you want to use it, provided that project has an exemption-policy. If you are talking about :en Wikipedia, see en:Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline for how to do it. --Túrelio (talk) 10:04, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks - apologies again --Wurbl (talk) 10:32, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Roman Retzbach

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Future-Institute?markasread=24314999&markasreadwiki=commonswiki#File:Roman_Retzbach_2020.jpg_was_recently_deleted

I have the permission to use the data (photo, bio, ...) "YvesMe (Wikipedia editor) is allowed to use my data (bio, cv, image, …)" https://future-institute.com/roman-retzbach/ --2003:E4:A740:2280:F170:2461:2B17:8EAF 15:47, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Hallo unbekannte IP,

falls du selbst Roman Retzbach bist, dann sende bitte von deiner offiziellen Emailadresse eine Bestätigung an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org, aus der hervorgeht, dass du der Schöpfer oder Rechteinhaber der jeweiligen Dateien/Fotos bist und diese unter der gewählten freien Lizenz freigeben möchtest. Bitte auch die Dateinamen (hier auf Commons) angeben, damit eine Zuordnung möglich ist. Deine Mail wird nicht veröffentlicht, sondern kann nur von den OTRS-Freiwilligen eingesehen werden. --Túrelio (talk) 16:51, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Löschanträge wegen URV

Hallo @Túrelio: Ich habe gesehen, dass du mehrerer meiner Löschanträge (mittels {{Copyvio}}) bearbeitet hast und die entsprechenden Dateien gelöscht hast. Ich wollte fragen, ob die Verwendung dieser Vorlage hier richtig ist, oder ob ich zuvor eine sanftere Anfrage an den Uploader stellen sollte? Danke!--Mahlzahn (talk) 13:26, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi Mahlzahn,

wenn du dir ziemlich sicher bist, dass es eine URV ist und du auch eine Evidenz dafür präsentieren kannst, dann ist das Copyvio-Tag richtig. Wenn du nur das bestimmte Gefühl hast, es scheint eine URV zu sein oder nur eine schwache Evidenz dafür hast, dann stelle besser einen regulären LA. --Túrelio (talk) 16:39, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Danke. Ich bin mir bei Fällen unsicher, wo nachweislich das Bild schon irgendwo unter nicht freier Lizenz veröffentlicht ist, der Uploader aber vermutlich selbst Urheberrechtsinhaber ist, da er zum Beispiel seine eigene Artikelseite erstellen will. Gibt es eine Vorlage, die ich einbinden könnte, die sowas sagt wie: bitte Mail mit ausdrücklicher Berechtigung an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org senden, sonst wird Artikel in 7 Tagen gelöscht? Oder ist es trotzdem besser das Bild vorerst zu löschen und im Zweifel kann es dann wiederhergestellt werden? Siehe z. B. das Beispiel unten zu Roman Retzbach.--Mahlzahn (talk) 09:12, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Die flexibelste Strategie ist dann ein regulärer LA, den wir auf Commons ja durchaus auch wählen, einfach um eine breitere Diskussion zu ermöglichen. Alle anderen Bausteine sind letztlich SLA und bieten per se keine Plattform zur Diskussion. Man kann einen Hochlader natürlich auch informell auf seiner Disku anschreiben. Da ist die Erfoglsrate (Hochlader reagiert) aber recht unterschiedlich, weil es natürlich viele fly-by-Hochlader gibt. D.h., es gibt keine Patentlösung. Der reguläre LA hat halt den Vorteil, dass es keinen Zeitdruck gibt. Sollte dann jemand eindeutige Evidenz für eine URV vorbringen, kann man immer noch schnelllöschen. --Túrelio (talk) 09:45, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

 Done Okay und danke! Dann werde ich im Zweifel normale LA stellen … Grüße --Mahlzahn (talk) 10:45, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

remove my account immediately

please remove my account immediately and all my copyright photos! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ckpixel (talk • contribs) 14:34, 30 June 2020 (UTC) Hi, I wish to remove my account with immediate effect as all my photos are non for free use. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ckpixel (talk • contribs) 14:47, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

You have to request that at COM:AN. --Túrelio (talk) 16:37, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Mistakenly removing three images that I own

Hello,

I uploaded the following three images to which I own the rights as I am Jason Dunford aka Samaki Mkuu. You had them removed for copyright violations. How can we rectify this, and what proof do you need to show I have the rights to them? File:SamakiMkuu.jpg File:Jason Dunford - Samaki Mkuu.jpg File:Jason Dunford - Samaki Mkuu.jpg.jpg

Many thanks,

Jason — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samakimkuu (talk • contribs) 14:36, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

@Samakimkuu, hi Jason,

did you really shoot all 3 images by yourself?

As the found external hits are all somehow associated to your real name, IMO it would be sufficient for you to send from your official email address a statement to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org about who is the photographer of the 3 shots and, if it's not you, include evidence of the permission from the photographer. --Túrelio (talk) 10:51, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Bildquelle

Hallo Túrelio, heute bin ich über diese Seite [19] gestolpert. Kann es sein, dass sich bei den Bildern unter dem Link "Quelle" und weiteren Links der Seite nur Spam befindet? Beste Grüße. Orchi (talk) 19:35, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Orchi,

in der Tat. Das ist das typische Bild, wenn der ursprüngliche Domaininhaber eine Seite aufgegeben hat. Die paar Bilder, die ich mir angeschaut habe, sind ja alle 2015 hochgeladen worden. Da sie anscheinend im Kontext irgendeiner Aktion hochgeladen wurden (es gibt ja sogar einen eigenen Baustein), denke ich mal, dass die Lizenz heute nicht unbedingt hinterfragt werden muss; allerdings könnten Nachnutzer durch den heutigen Inhalt des Quuelllinks verärgert werden. Ich werde mal meine Kollegen fragen, ob wir für solche Fälle eine etablierte Vorgehensweise haben. Interessant: bei den ältesten 5 Uploads ist der Inhalt der Quelle noch in Ordnung. --Túrelio (talk) 18:55, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

...die letzten Seiten hatte ich auch gesehen und habe dann etliche Sichproben gemacht. Ich bin mal gespannt, wie wie Du und Deine Kollegen die Angelegenheit sehen. Grüße. Orchi (talk) 19:42, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Reid family

Please delete the photographs, I was fulfilling a request for a local historian. The fine details required are not available. Many thanks. RSLlGriffith (talk) 08:43, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi Rosser1954,

most important is the age of the original photograph. If it's old enough, we may keep it, even if we don't know the other information. --Túrelio (talk) 08:45, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello, why do such a rude thing?

I have accidentally uploaded two versions of a file, and then I have right away asked for the incorrect version to be deleted. Why would you delete the correct version, and then redirect it to the wrong version, that is still requesting deletion? Could you please revert your deletion, thanks. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 11:10, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

At this moment I've no idea what you are talking about. I had 100 deletions today and around 300 yesterday. Please provide the name of the file(s) you are talking about. --Túrelio (talk) 12:12, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, I was worked up by the deletion and wrote without rereading my post. Please take a look at File:Suvorov-Cherkesskiy Post Office 353426 - 1.jpeg File:Suvorov-Cherkesskiy Post Office 353426 - 2.jpeg and File:Suvorov-Cherkesskiy Post Office 353426 - 3.jpeg. All three currently are deleted and are redirects to files that I have asked to be deleted. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 14:52, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Ok. All 3 had been dupe-tagged this morning by A1Cafel. I've acted on these requests.--Túrelio (talk) 15:00, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Now restored. --Túrelio (talk) 15:04, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. I think that other files are ok to delete. I was the uploader and requested the removal right away. The files are: File:Varvarovka Post Office - 353426 - 1.jpeg File:Varvarovka Post Office - 353426 - 2.jpeg File:Varvarovka Post Office - 353426 - 3.jpeg ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 15:18, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:08, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

File deleted

My file cook_the_blues_are_still_blue_350ppi.jpg was deleted for possible copyright infringement.

The file in question is a photograph of a painting of my own creation. The painting uses parody and significantly alters the original. As a work of art, it does not infringe on any copyright laws. The file was uploaded to Flickr and is a public domain image. Could you undelete the file please?

Benjamincookart (talk) 12:44, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Correction, the file in question is cook_blues_are_still_blue_350ppi.jpg Benjamincookart (talk) 13:07, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi Benjamincookart,

to understand you correctly: at the start of the "chain" there was an original painting or ?, not created by you. Based on this, you created another painting, which technically (and eventually legally) might be considered a derivative of the original. Finally, you took a photography of your painting. Right?

I am aware that in art there is a longstanding tradition to create new works based (to a different degree) on previous works of others. However, in modern times (copyright laws) and especially here on Commons, where we claim that all material may be legally re-used in any manner, including commercial use, the chain of copyright needs to be evaluated properly.

Back to your case: if the original is out of copyright already, there is no problem for derivatives. If the original is still in copyright, it needs to be evaluated whether your work is legally a derivative of the other original and thereby may infringe the other artists copyright. As such an evaluation is complicated, it cannot be made on my talkpage. I would consider putting the image into a regular deletion-request, which allows a broad discussion and input from others, provided there is at least a reasonable perspective for not being a derivative. As has already be hinted at Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2020-07#Cook_Blues_Are_Still_Blue_350ppi.jpg, the typical exceptions used by the media (press) and in critical commentary, i.e. the fair-use clause, is not applicable here, as Commons is legally not allowed to host such material. If you want to use the image only or mainly on :en Wikipedia, you should drop the case here and try local upload at :en, claiming fair-use. --Túrelio (talk) 06:59, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Лисагор (File:Artwork. Lisagor Portrait.jpg)

Я увлекаюсь графикой, портретами архитекторов 20 века. Они все умерли. Поэтому я изучаю их прижизненные фотографии и создаю свою графику. У меня несколько графических портретов, в том числе Лисагора. Я сейчас помещу ещё один на склад, это моя работа. Вы её тоже поставите на удаление? --Elena4gb (talk) 03:05, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi Elena4gb,

you claimed File:Artwork. Lisagor Portrait.jpg to be own work from 2020, whereas User:Lesless, who had copyvio-tagged the image, found that the depicted person had died in the 1930ies and that the image was not originally your work. When you upload images (or other media) to Commons, you neeed to take care that it is truely your own work or is evidently already in the public domain. In most countries of the world, copyright stays with the original creator until 70 years after his/her death. --Túrelio (talk) 07:05, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Is it okay if I revive a category?

Hello, Túrelio. I have uploaded File:9 deletion requests, which contains a gray number 9. Is it okay if I revive that category? User:The SVG Effect 13:50, 11 Jul 2020

Sure.  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 21:46, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Photo deleted

Hello. You deleted the photo of File:MuslimNazaev.jpg because: "This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: http://wsport.su/2010/08/?print=print-search +watermark"

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%B5%D0%B2,_%D0%9C%D1%83%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BC_%D0%9C%D1%83%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87 — Preceding unsigned comment added by NaimFR (talk • contribs) 10:02, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

First, I would like to inform you that I was the coach of this athlete (who, incidentally, is my nephew) and this was my own photo. Secondly, I am the author and owner of the website WSPORT-SHATOY - http://wsport.su For many years this photo was on Wikipedia and no one had any questions.

My name is Movladi Abdoulaev

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D0%B1%D0%B4%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B5%D0%B2,_%D0%9C%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B8_%D0%90%D0%B1%D1%83%D1%8F%D0%B7%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87 — Preceding unsigned comment added by NaimFR (talk • contribs) 10:00, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

You also deleted a photo of my father, despite the fact that I pointed out that my own photo.

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D0%B1%D0%B4%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B5%D0%B2,_%D0%90%D0%B1%D1%83%D1%8F%D0%B7%D0%B8%D1%82_%D0%90%D0%B1%D0%B4%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87 — Preceding unsigned comment added by NaimFR (talk • contribs) 10:07, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi NaimFR,

with regard to File:MuslimNazaev.jpg: The fact that this image was on Commons since 2017 has little relevance. Just 2 days ago we became aware of an image that was on Commons since 2015 and claimed to be under a free license, when in fact it was a shot by an agency-photographer. We were notified because a re-user had to pay 300 Euros in license-fees to the agency. In order to avoid such problems we try to check all images thoroughly. How should we know of your relation to wsport.su? So, if you really shot this photo by yourself, send a confirmation from your official wsport email address to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org or to permissions-ru@wikimedia.org (in Russian) and confirm that you are the photographer or the rightsholder. Thereafter I can restore the image. --Túrelio (talk) 10:44, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

with regard to File:Abdulaev abuyazit.jpg: this image was a duplicate of File:Абуязид Абдулаевич Абдулаев, 1974г..jpg and therefore redirected. --Túrelio (talk) 10:46, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Repeated file

Hello, how are you, my friend. I want to ask you a question: is it allowed to create multiple files of the same style? A user created a file equal to another and I consider that it is unnecessary since it is the same. Check the following:

File:AMLO 2020.jpg and File:President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador in the White House (cropped).jpg

The last one already has several days created, it is better to load the format for the last file and not create each style. Sorry if I don't link, I don't know how to do it.--Dimartz (talk) 16:14, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi Dimartz,

I've now linked the 2 files; you can see the required code.

With regard to your question: generally, one should avoid uploading true duplicates (will be speedy-deleted) or near-duplicates (require a deletion-request). However, in this specific case it is justifiable IMO to have the 2 variants of this crop. Some people might prefer the version where the head is positioned exactly vertically, others where the head appears to be slightly tilted; it's depending on personal taste. As both variants are currently in use, we should keep them both. --Túrelio (talk) 18:47, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	Ganz herzlichen Dank für die prompte Löschung der Dateien! Swiss National Library (talk) 09:08, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Another similar file

Hi Túrelio, I noticed that you just deleted a file on FOP grounds. There is another image of the same statue that I flagged as a copyvio on the same FOP grounds yesterday, but that was converted to a deletion request: Commons:Deletion requests/File:A Surge of Power (Jen Reid) 15th July 2020.jpg. I don't know if you want to contribute there, or whether it affects the file you already deleted, but I thought I'd better let you know about it. -- DeFacto (talk). 10:30, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I've seen this thereafter. However, due to the current attention to the underlying topic, it seems wise to me to leave the deletion-discussion open for a few days. Otherwise this image might be uploaded again and again. --Túrelio (talk) 10:40, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Kritzinger

Hallo Túrelio, ich bin nicht ganz glücklich über die Neuanlage von Category:Friedrich Wilhelm Kritzinger. Es deutet einiges darauf hin, dass der Rufname "Wilhelm" war (seine Werke hat er überwiegend nur als "Wilhelm" oder "F. Wilhelm" publiziert), und ich versuche gerade zu klären, ob de:Friedrich Wilhelm Kritzinger (Theologe) nicht auf das einfachere Lemma verschoben werden sollte, wohingegen der Namensvetter de:Friedrich Wilhelm Kritzinger (Ministerialdirektor) wohl wirklich unter dem Doppel-Vornamen bekannter ist, und Category:Friedrich Kritzinger dementsprechend besser dieses Lemma erhielte. --FordPrefect42 (talk) 14:03, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

ja, kein Problem. Du kannst es ggf. einfach verschieben; hat ja nur 1 subcat. Schön wäre es, wenn man ein Bild von ihm finden würde; zumal das ja längst PD sein sollte. --Túrelio (talk) 15:00, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Werde ich wahrscheinlich machen, wenn ich die Literatur ganz ausgewertet habe. Es gibt [20], aber ohne erkennbare Quellenangabe, also keine Ahnung, ob das authentisch ist. --FordPrefect42 (talk) 20:21, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

V Madhusoodanan Nair Sahithya Akademi Picture

Hello Túrelio, this message concerns the deletion of a picture of Prof. V Madhusoodanan Nair receiving the Sahithya Akademi Award. This picture was taken with the permission of V Madhusoodanan Nair, therefore, I do not understand why the picture was deleted under a copyright violation. Please let me know the reason the picture was deleted, thank you for understanding :). Below is the link of the file being deleted

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:V_Madhusoodanan_Nair_Sahithya_Akademi.jpg

Thank you!Vmadhgrand (talk) 20:21, 16 July 2020 (UTC) Vmadhgrand 7/16/2020

Hi Vmadhgrand,

the image was deleted as it had been tagged by another user for copyvio-suspicion as he had found it published on another website. This evidence alone was a bit weak. However, the image-file also had no metadata (EXIF), which would be rather unusual for a photo shot by a modern camera.

So, to get this straight: Did you really shoot this photo by yourself or did you get from somebody/smoewhere? Also, I am not sure what you meant by "picture was taken with the permission"? This could mean he allowed you to photograph him, which would be rather unnecessary in the depicted situation, or he allowed you to take it from is website or something. --Túrelio (talk) 20:33, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

To be deleted

Hi, I would like to delete these photos because there are the same photos on wikimedia commons, also because I have written bad titles it is totally to be deleted, I would like you to delete them Thank you

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Patrioti_etiopici_impiccati_da_terroristi_fascisti_italiani.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Soldati_italiani_che_impiccano_un_patriota_etiopico.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fucilazione_di_un_patriota_etiopico_durante_la_campagna_di_terrorismo_degli_italiani_fascisti.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Soldato_italiano_con_la_testa_decapitata_di_un_patriota_etiopico.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Patrioti_etiopici_impiccati_da_terroristi_fascisti_italiani_1.jpg Thanks--Gilberto Tzahi Turati (talk) 16:38, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

done already by Green Giant. --Túrelio (talk) 08:58, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

File:120923 경주 한류 드림콘서트 씨스타 02.jpg

Hi, not sure why File:120923 경주 한류 드림콘서트 씨스타 02.jpg was deleted as a duplicate of File:120923 경주 한류 드림콘서트 씨스타 01.jpg. The pictures were probably taken a fraction of a second apart, but they are not the same file. COM:CSD#F8 requires an exact copy, which it was not. ƏXPLICIT 23:49, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Right, I've overlooked the small difference. Now restored. --Túrelio (talk) 14:49, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Karan Johar and Abhishek Bachchan on the sets of KANK (2).jpg

Hi, you have reverted my edit in this file. But as far I know Bollywood Hungama licensed some of their photos under CC-BY-3.0 via OTRS ticket:2008030310010794. This include only photographs of parties and events taken by their own photographers. And every other photos published in this site are copyrighted. Regards.মোহাম্মাদ ইসমাইল (talk) 17:07, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi মোহাম্মাদ ইসমাইল,

I've seen you have tagged a number of these images for speedy-deletion. I would recommend you to put them all together into one regular (not speedy) deletion-request. That makes it easier to come to a consistent decision. Otherwise it remains a sort of judgement-call, depending on who processes your speedies. --Túrelio (talk) 18:37, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Continuous Copyright Violations

Hi Túrelio DineshRedbull is just violating rules and playing with the system by uploading copyright images via Flickr to avoid scrutiny. The user has been warned earlier but still violating rules. Please have a look. Thank you ~ Amkgp 💬 10:27, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for notifying. Images deleted and Flickr-account added to black list. --Túrelio (talk) 15:04, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

@Túrelio: DineshRedbull has created a new account VirendersinghUP and is uploading copyright violation picture via same flickr account. Please have a look. Thank you ~ Amkgp 💬 15:34, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Blocked. --Túrelio (talk) 14:45, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

@Túrelio: Another sock DhruvKumarJogi and again same copyright violations. Thank you ~ Amkgp 💬 18:37, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Nothing to fear.jpg

Hey there. Several Houres ago you removed a file that I uploaded a day ago under name of "Nothing_to_fear". I received a notification waith a copyrights violation warning. just letting you know, this picture was already uploaded by another user but I wasn't able to attach it to the article that I was working on. I translated https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nothing_to_Fear_(song) to Farsi but the artwork wasn't able on Farsi database so I tried to upload one more time in order to use it in the same order that it was used in the English version. AshkHead (talk)

Hi AshkHead,

I see. With the other "picture" you are likely refaering to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Chris_Rea_Nothing_to_Fear_1992_single_cover.jpg. However, when you look at that site, you can see clearly that this image 1) is not on Commons, and 2) is claimed as "fair-use", which is legal construction of U.S. copyright-law. Such material is not allowed on Commons. The image itself shows the artwork of an album cover. Such images are usually always copyrighted, either with the record company or with the artists. So, you need to obtain a valid permission from the rights-holder before uploading it to Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 06:57, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Harris + Hoole logo.svg

Hi! This logo is too simple even under British law. If you disagree, please start a DR and let more users decide.--RZuo (talk) 12:56, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

are you aware that this image was originally uploaded under fair-use and of the tagger's statement "the copyright holder's website[21] states: "No licence is granted to you in these Terms and Conditions to use any trade mark of Harris + Hoole or its affiliated companies" ? --Túrelio (talk) 14:36, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

It's too simple to be copyrighted. It doesnt meet COM:TOO. Whatever their statement is does not matter. Trademark right is different from copyright.--RZuo (talk) 15:00, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

@RZuo: I think this is above UK TOO. I think it is about as simple w:File:EDGE_magazine_(logo).svg, which was found to be copyrightable in the UK [22] [23] by the w:High Court of Justice. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 19:34, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

EDGE is stylised. This is just a string of letters put inside a rectangle, on par with BBC logos.--RZuo (talk) 19:40, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

@RZuo: I've undeleted the image and put it into a regular DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Harris + Hoole logo.svg, to allow for discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 10:15, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Emydocephalus annulatus.jpg

Hi Túrelio, you deleted File:Emydocephalus annulatus.jpg yesterday a few hours after being flagged by ‎user:INaturalistReviewBot. I'm a bit surprised of the short notice since the bot says I have 7 days to provide the required missing infos. Now the file is deleted, I can no longer recover the source link to check this out. I would like to understand what happen, this would help me to either not reproduce the same mistake or provide the missing info. Can you help me out ? Thanks in advance.--Hiouf (talk) 08:25, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi Hiouf,

here is the source-link: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/19644808

As you can see, it's clearly labeled as "All rights reserved". This was the reason for me to speedy-delete it, in order to save inadvertent external re-users from litigation for copyright-infringement. Of course, feel free to try to convince the photographer to release this image under a free license (CC-BY or CC-BY-SA). I will then gladly undelete it. --Túrelio (talk) 09:16, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for your quick reply. I do see the licence CC-BY-SA, just under the list of best identifiers. You can even see in the comments that I asked the observer to change the licence. However, it is true that if you click on the information button for the photo, you go to another page that mentions "All rights reserved". It's like there are 2 licences for the same photo ? Strange, what do you think ? cheers --Hiouf (talk) 09:47, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

You might try to contact him directly via Email. --Túrelio (talk) 11:03, 25 July 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fan272 234 (talk • contribs) 12:44, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

@Hiouf: iNaturalist allows users to apply different licenses to their photos and their "observations", similarly to how we allow files in a myriad of different licenses but all file description pages are cc-by-sa-3.0. The photo license is displayed in an icon in the bar near the bottom of the photo and on the photo information page: https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/30249715. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 18:10, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Got it. Thanks for the help guys! Cheers.--Hiouf (talk) 08:44, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the deletion

I talked to a fotographer who agreed to one of her works being published in Wikipedia under CC 3.0. I uploaded the file, so it could be unambiguously identified in the letter by the link, sent her a mail asking for her formal permission according to the preliminary agreement, and wrote on the talk page of the file that OTRS is pending, in the hope that anyone feeling the urge to delete would read it and restrain themselves for a couple of days. You, on the other hand, decided that ignoring the notice would be a much more rational approach. Now, pray tell, what in your mind would be the correct procedure for files that are in the process of getting OTRS confirmation, to avoid such behaviour as yours? --Ehitaja (talk) 10:36, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

I didn't see your notice on the talkpage. You should have put it on the image-page. When you get a positive signal from OTRS, drop me a note and I will undelete it. --Túrelio (talk) 15:09, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Well, back when I started in Wikipedia in 2004, talk pages were used for talking about the content pages, so discussions would not be held on the content pages. If there's a new policy for ignoring those, is there also some new template for the "OTRS incoming, do not delete" message or should I just write it on the top in big red letters? It seems I really can't keep in touch with all the new developments here. --Ehitaja (talk) 10:47, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

If you want to be formally correct, put {{OTRS pending}} on the top of the image-page. However, even an informal remark like "permission from rightsholder sent to OTRS" would alert the processing admin. --Túrelio (talk) 10:55, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Well, I got the confirmation mail from the photographer and forwarded it to the et-permissions address but I'm not sure when exactly they might get to it. I'll try to poke some folks to move it along. It might go easier, though, if there was a place they could attach their plaque. --Ehitaja (talk) 16:46, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

I've temp-restored the image and added the OTRS-template. Yes, processing permissions is often rather delayed, as our OTRS volunteers are overworked. --Túrelio (talk) 18:36, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Pristimantis academicus.jpg

Hi. Could you please provide the source URL for File:Pristimantis academicus.jpg? I'd like to make sure there are no archives, as there were for certain files here. Best, --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 21:43, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

"Hrm. Wayback Machine has not archived that URL." Neither has archive.is. There might be other archives though for the source. De728631 (talk) 21:54, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, was CC-BY-NC since Jul 2017. Thanks for looking! --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 22:05, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Maroc Telecom Logo (File:Maroc Telecom Logo.png)

You kinda broke the Maroc Telecom logo on several wikis, but thanks for deleting Anomper012 (talk) 21:30, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi Anomper012,

well, when an image is considered unfree and needs to be deleted, one cannot avoid that its uses are removed. If the projects, which used this image, have an exemption-policy, such as "fair-use" on :en, you may upload it locally on these projects. --Túrelio (talk) 06:31, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Help

Hi, could you please help me with File:Hunter Valley Vineyards (23756328125).jpg. I uploaded this and 39 other files from Flickr. They are all in public domain. But something went wrong. I'm not sure what to do.মোহাম্মাদ ইসমাইল (talk) 23:15, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

sorry, but I will be too busy in RL today. Contrary to what it seems, images on Flickr carrying the "public domain mark" are not necessarily really in the public domain. It's complicated and a mess; see Commons:Requests_for_comment/Flickr_and_PD_images#Status_of_PD_Mark_1.0. AFAIK, you need to verify whether the Flickr-user, who offers such images, is really the photographer, as only he/she can put an image into the PD. If you are sure about that, then you might use the PD-Author template. The safest way would be to contact the Flickr-user directly and ask him to either change the license on Flickr to CC-BY or alike or to confirm the PD-Author license to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 07:05, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

User Dldf23

Hi! User Dldf23 received last warning back in December[24], yet he continues to upload photos from web under false self made claim[25].--Oleola (talk) 03:19, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Blocked. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 08:10, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

File:A Lifetime Tan (61877709).jpeg

Hi, this image is in Commons under CC-BY-SA-3.0 license. But it was publish on Flickr under CC-BY-SA-2.0. It's also in Instagram. Is it OK here?মোহাম্মাদ ইসমাইল (talk) 05:34, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi মোহাম্মাদ ইসমাইল,

thanks for your attentiveness. I think we can ignore the Flickr-hit as 1) it contains Facebook/Instagram code in its metadata (so was obviously copied from there), and 2) is a crop from our version. The name of the account-holder on Instagram is identical to the author-name for our image. Our version has full metadata, which is confirmative for the assumption that the original author released the image also on 500px, from where it was copied to Commons. The only thing a bit suspicious is that the metadata contain the statement "© 2014 Makia Minich, All Rights Reserved", despite being a released on 500px. --Túrelio (talk) 08:06, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for answering. Is there anything we can do about the metadata statement? Or should we just ignore it?মোহাম্মাদ ইসমাইল (talk) 10:35, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Deletion of files uploaded by User talk:Yankees999

Hi Túrelio. I noticed at User talk:Yankees999 that you deleted UB Stadium.jpg. Another file uploaded by the same user is also a copyright violation. I nominated it for deletion over a month ago. It's at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Zack Hample Posing With Baseballs In 2016.jpg. Could you possibly take a look at that one as well? Thank you. JimKaatFan (talk) 23:43, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. All his uploads deleted. --Túrelio (talk) 09:10, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! JimKaatFan (talk) 15:56, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Photo rights

wiki professionals was trying to update my wiki page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Davis_(filmmaker)). I gave them a photo of me and you took it down. They told me that you wanted to speak directly to me about the photo rights. It is my photo and I own all rights. How can it be put up on my page? thank you. Ron — Preceding unsigned comment added by Docuron (talk • contribs) 20:30, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi Ron,

this is about File:Ron Davis (Film maker).jpg, which had been uploaded more than 2 months ago by JoseMartin(Rubia) (talk · contribs), who claimed it as own work. However, a recent-uploader patroler found it published at https://www.imdb.com/name/nm2861672/mediaviewer/rm3448336384 and thereby suspicious of being a copyvio, the more as this user has uploaded more copyvios. Consequently, I've deleted the image 2 days after its tagging. User JoseMartin(Rubia)} had been notified about the problem, but didn't react. As you aren't the uploader, you weren't notified. Now, even, if you gave this image to the uploader (though you wrote of "wiki professionals"), it would not have been o.k. to claim it as own work by the uploader.

If you are indeed Don Davis, you need to make sure that you own enough copyright in this image from the photographer to release it under a free license, as required by our (COM:L) and Wikipedia's policy. If that is really the case, you need to jump to Commons:Email_templates#Email_message_template_for_release_of_rights_to_a_file, copy the text in the grey box, enter the Commons filename of the image, eventually add the name of the photographer (depending on what the contract says), sign and date it and mail it from your official/business email address to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 21:03, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

File:ETH-BIB-Bazenheid-LBS H1-010793.tif

Hi Túrelio, File:ETH-BIB-Bazenheid-LBS H1-010793.tif is not a duplicate and was imported from http://doi.org/10.3932/ethz-a-000352918. Would you mind restoring the file? Thank you! --1-Byte (talk) 10:43, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi 1-Byte,

restored. But our software says it's a duplicate. --Túrelio (talk) 10:48, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, it seems it was accidentally replaced by the detected duplicate. --1-Byte (talk) 12:17, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi

Yamla began again. BTW is this file taken from a copyrighted site or not? --E4024 (talk) 16:22, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi, you meant YAMLAISVERTYLIKELYHITER (talk · contribs)? Blocked already. --Túrelio (talk) 18:44, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi2, the file seems to be o.k. At the bottom of the source-site, there is a note "All materials on this site are posted under the terms of the license CC-BY 4.0" (translat.) --Túrelio (talk) 20:32, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

G10

Hi. Can you please delete the spam left by User:MAKANYC? My fingers are aching due to F10 edits. :) Thanks a lot. --E4024 (talk) 05:04, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:13, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Helo mr. Turelio!

Please contact me for inappropriate removal of data. handtheatre@gmail.com Best regards! Ивомир Инатов — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 46.10.102.199 (talk) 20:23, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi Ивомир Инатов,

please log-in and use this link to contact me. However, it would be better if you could post your question or complaint here. --Túrelio (talk) 10:25, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Flickr-email

Hi. how exactly can one "Flickr-email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" when Flickrmail doesn't touch the outside world?   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 06:55, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi, AFAIK, when you have a Flickr-account, you also get an associated email-address (at least this was formerly so). Due to this association it can easily be used for confirmation (without the need for an additional crediting process). --Túrelio (talk) 07:48, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Request for independent views

Hi, Túrelio please have a look if interested Commons:Deletion requests/File:Serum-institute-of-india-logo.png. Thank you. ~ Amkgp 💬 18:41, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020

Hallo T%C3%BArelio,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2020 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Es haben sich auch Kulturdenkmale verändert, sie wurden saniert oder umgestaltet. Diese Entwicklung kann auch gezeigt werden. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab 5. September 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams Z thomas 15:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Ala Hadrat.jpg

Kindly reply whatake you 😊not to delete it2401:4900:1B12:B4D:5CDE:15ED:1CB2:2DE2 16:42, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Turilio, I looked that you have removed the duplicate template place by me on the File:Ala hasrat.jpg, will you please tell me why have you not delete this copy right violated image?????? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 401:4900:1B12:B4D:5CDE:15ED:1CB2:2DE2 (talk • contribs)

Hi, I just removed the template-doublette, as it doesn't make sense to have the same template twice. --Túrelio (talk) 16:46, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

I have opened a regular DR, as this image might already be PD. --Túrelio (talk) 18:24, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Will you please be clear, I can't understand your language, as far as I know you are admin on this wiki, so I am just asking why have you not deleted this 🌿2401:4900:1B12:B4D:5CDE:15ED:1CB2:2DE2 18:36, 22 August 2020 (UTC)18:28, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ala Hadrat.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 18:57, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

About an "official" photo

Good afternoon, I hope you are well, I have a question. Can you review this file? (File:Presidente Bukele.jpg) Apparently it is an official photo but it would have to have a free license for its use. The user assures that it is free.--Dimartz (talk) 23:22, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

it's possibly a copyvio. I've opened a DR. --Túrelio (talk) 09:57, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

Why are you assuming that's a copyvio and I don't have the rights to share my own work? It's impossible that the URL shared by Dimartz which makes reference to a PDF uploaded to my government webpage in wich is the photo of the President of El Salvador have the same quality of the image that uploaded here. Common sense guys. Let me know what I have to do to show that this image is from my property.

Regards, AndreX (talk) 03:42, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

As it's at least unlikely that a government would use a photo of a Wikipedian as an official photo. --Túrelio (talk) 18:22, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Category:Chréa National Park

Hi Túrelio,
The correct name is Chréa National Park, not Chrea National Park. See Chréa National Park
— Mouh2jijel ^[Talk] 16:24, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi Mouh2jijel,

feel free to recreate the correct cat. --Túrelio (talk) 18:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Duplicate request

Hi Túrelio. Would you mind redirecting this duplicate to Denis Thatcher 1988.tif? Thanks, ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 07:57, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Meldungen

Hallo Túrelio, dies ist wahrscheinlich nicht der korrekte Weg, eine Nachricht an Dich zu schicken, oder?

Ich habe Dir zwei E-Mails geschickt. Interessant wäre für mich auch, wie Nachrichten - z.B. an Dich - mit dem Glockensymbol bzw. mit dem Kästchensymbol erzeugt werden können. Für Deine Hilfe wäre ich Dir dankbar. Grüße Dagoheri Dagoheri (talk) 07:56, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Painting duplicate

Hi Túrelio, you deleted File:Antonello da Messina, , Kunsthistorisches Museum Wien, Gemäldegalerie - Maria mit Kind und den Hll. Nikolaus von Bari, Anastasia (^), Ursula, Dominikus und (vom Rahmen über - GG 2574 - Kunsthistorisches Museum.jpg as a duplicate of File:Antonello da Messina - Madonna with the Saints Nicholas of Bari, Lucia, Ursula and Dominic - Google Art Project.jpg. The colors are complete different and it's from a different source. This file should have never been deleted as a duplicate. Please undo this deletion and be a bit more careful in the future. Multichill (talk) 20:48, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi Multichill,

I've undeleted the file. However, when again comparing the images (1 vs. 2), which I had done before the deletion, I don't see any difference in colors. If there really is, then my monitor seems to be unable to show it and I would then refrain from touching any paintings. --Túrelio (talk) 08:07, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. The first one is slightly darker. Google seems to have had (or still has) a habit of taking high resolution images with natural coloring and adjusting the colors to make it look better (just like in advertising). I recall being at a GLAM partner many years ago and the people at their photo studio were quite upset about that. If you open the two of them in two tabs and switch between them you should be able to see the difference in color. Multichill (talk) 12:26, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Disruptive edits

Hi. IP 46.132.191.22 is removing legitimate copyvio tags from files. Thanks for your attention. --E4024 (talk) 13:27, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Taken care of. --Túrelio (talk) 14:59, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

G3. Content intended as vandalism, threat, or attack

Hallo Túrelio, sei doch bitte mal so nett und bearbeite File:Drapeau LGBT.jpg. Wenn Du der Meinung bist, dass das Arschabwischen mit der Regenbogenfahne der Lesben und Schwulen kein G3 ist, auch ok. Dann stelle ich einen LA. Danke Dir und frohes Schaffen noch. Adelfrank (talk) 14:28, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Gelöscht, da kaum eigenes Werk. --Túrelio (talk) 15:30, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Tweet

Hi. I do not know which tweets are accepted and which not. The one at File:Yasa teklifi.png shows sensitive personal information about someone. IMO it should be speedily deleted. It does not help Commons at any way either. Thanks for your attention. --E4024 (talk) 15:56, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Upload, deleted, upload, deleted, upload

Hallo Túrelio, hast Du große Ahnung von Technik im Zusammenhang mit Server-Adressen? Kann man an diesen Löschungen noch feststellen, wer der Ersteller war? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ignacio_Hidalgo.jpg `... und ob der Ersteller (nun mit Namen Ignacio Hidalgo angeblich höchstpersönlich) identisch ist: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ignacio_Hidalgo_Actor ? - Der neue uupload vom 2.9. knapp 3 Std., nach dem gestrigen Löschen, und der Löschung 3 Tage zuvor. - Und jedesmal ist der Hochlader des Bildes zu dusselig category:actors einzugeben, erst der Bot setzt actor zu actors um. - Wenn Du der falsche Ansprechpartner bist; weißt Du, wer oder wo jemand Askunft geben kann? Adelfrank (talk) 20:31, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

Server-Adressen? Keine Ahnung.

Unter dem o.g. Dateinamen wurden 2 völlig unterschiedliche Fotos hochgeladen, von denen der Hochlader (User:Sakery und User:Mhior) jeweils behauptete auch der Autor zu sein. Die anschließend von Ignacio Hidalgo Actor (talk · contribs) hochgeladene Datei File:Ignacio-hidalgo.jpg ist identisch mit der von Mhior hochgeladenen. Vermutlich ist ersterer also eine SP von letzterem; dazu passt auch der Konto-Anmeldezeitpunkt. Andererseits konnte ich das zuletzt hochgeladene Foto im Web nicht finden. Insofern kann man das no-perm-Speedy erstmal weiterlaufen lassen. --Túrelio (talk) 06:50, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Nix zu finden? https://www.imdb.com/name/nm5617188/mediaviewer/rm758882305?ref_=nm_ov_ph - Na, warten wir mal 7 Tage ob eine Lizenz kommt, ich behalte das im Auge. Adelfrank (talk) 15:04, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Deleted File:Dave Leduc challenging his opponent with the Lekkha Moun.png

Similar to what happen here File:Dave Leduc vs Thai Inmate at Prison Fight Thailand 2014.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Dave_Leduc_vs_Thai_Inmate_at_Prison_Fight_Thailand_2014.jpg

I recently understood that once a picture is uploaded on IMBD, you somehow forfeit your rights. I previously had given permission to Mr. Leduc's management team to use it on his IMBD profile, unaware that It would be waiving the rights to the photograph. I since asked them to remove the picture and it has since be been successfully deleted. According to the initial nomination rationale: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm8918301/mediaviewer/rm1932759809 the picture is not there anymore. Lethweimaster (talk)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:23, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Balkan 250 K motorcycle.png

Hello, I recently uploaded this image and it got deleted due to possible copyright violation, but I have got permission from the owner of the image via email to use it, is it possible to somehow un-delete it? I am currently new to Commons and have next to none copyright knowledge, sorry if I am asking a stupid question. MotoJawaCZ (talk) 07:58, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi MotoJawaCZ,

you need to forward said permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. They will evaluate it, which may allow the undeletion of the image. However, the permission needs to be under a license, which allows also commercial use and creation of derivatives (see COM:L), such as the recommended license CC-BY-SA 3.0 [26]. A mere "permission for Wikipedia" is not enough. --Túrelio (talk) 08:09, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Jossi Wieler.jpg

Hi Turélio,

can you please restore? We have a release from the photographer at OTRS.

Thanks, greetings --Mussklprozz (talk) 09:23, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Mussklproz,  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:28, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

¡muchas gracias! --Mussklprozz (talk) 09:47, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks a lot

Thanks for your speedy deletion of my uploads. There was personal information in the exif data.

Do you think I can reupload these files once I have cleaned the exif? Yours sincerely,--Le Petit Chat (talk) 15:46, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Category:Griffonia physocarpa - botanical illustrations

Both images in show two different specias : , Griffonia simplicifolia and Griffonia physocarpa. So they should be in both categories. Michel Chauvet (talk) 19:16, 6 September 2020 (UTC).

Hi,

no objection. However, you should discuss with/notify User:MILEPRI, who had tagged this cat for deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 20:49, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Photo to be deleted

I would like to delete these 3 photos that I published, I was wrong to publish them, thanks--Samuele Redaelli (talk) 08:36, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hanged_Man.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hanged_Man1.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Beheaded_Heads.jpg

Hi can u help delete this image?

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jordan_Yamamoto_Marlins_Park,_2019.jpg#mw-jump-to-license

Because this image violate the rule, it's from https://www.fishstripes.com/2019/7/29/8934375/marlins-throwback-weekend-2019-photo-gallery-recap

And https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/18342184/jordan_yamamoto_delivery_throwback_danis_sosa_FS.jpeg

Yyang Sr. GakupoKaito (talk) 21:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

 Done. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 06:38, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for deleting the incorrect category

Dear Túrelió! Thank you very much for deleting the incorrect „G. Heuer & Kirmse X. A.“ category. --Bizottmány (talk) 18:30, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

jesse davis jazz

I give up!!!!! You guys continuosly permit misinformation,mistakes etc... with little regard to the artist's or person's reputation,career it directly affects but God forbid the person/artist make an honest attempt to rectify or correct said misrepresentation. Do what you will...in fact DELETE MY PROFILE!!! After 35yrs I don't need Wikipedia!

TrueJazzz (talk) 19:05, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

How about playing by the rules? Your upload File:Jesse Davis jazz.jpg was licensed only under a Commons-noncompliant cc-by-nd license. Apart from that, here you are on Commons, not Wikipedia. So, none of the things of your rant have anything to do with me or this project. --Túrelio (talk) 19:09, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi can u help delete this image?

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mills_in_2020.jpg#mw-jump-to-license

It's cropped from MLB Video. https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZiufUwKz_1LgUAnKiSQ2wQN6F4olZ18-bzh96u5qt4oKzvQbo6cpXDR8wif-KmhvzuRoEuadHWDtzDGbiBFVq8X707QwraKQx_1Vn0WI1j2rh5Sa-0AyHxOcWrOS12SYDgAlSZiZd5qVEXLsxdri0gMEhoiCizEM7qD7SCKAr3qNJFQso7yq7ysidRJf6fUTR30jPMT56xUbBy88MuqJn2aHzkaS8qDE5PvDxwSgR3ZAYdUcVtCPPRnSJeTsYB9txNphF7CRYi8Sb_1zKTet_1Hg2Buhf-yuCQB3rVP34YyEA16n4pb4js_1jCQ3YToFO7pBR_13kjdJciAPA7R4qpZVICJdUb0JxSuQ&hl=zh-TW

And

https://www.spox.com/de/video/mlb/2008/mills-sadler-wick-pitch-shutout.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yyang Sr. GakupoKaito (talk • contribs)

Tagged. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 21:36, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Q

Hi. Is it ok for me to tag and delete pages myself? Or should the files be double checked by another admin? --Minorax^talk 08:44, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi Minorax,

depends a bit. For absolutely blatant copyvios, you can tag and then speedy-delete them. If less good evidence or slight doubt, just tag them. Childp0rn: tag, speedy-delete, block uploader and report to WMF-legal. "Revenge-p0rn" like images and unambiguously attack-images: tag, speedy and likely block uploader. IMO. --Túrelio (talk) 09:05, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. Kindly delete the files at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Kd.thienluan, I don't want to close a DR I created. --Minorax^talk 09:15, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

RE:Pala Olimpico image

Hi, sure, no problem :)--Mannivu · ✉ 16:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

File:ReteferroviariaEmiliaRomagna.jpg

Hello. I can assure you that I took the photo at Cervia-Milano Marittima train station. The article you linked to is four years later. The site incronaca.unibo.it has simply took the photo from Commons, already well after it was uploaded by me. I've removed the notice. ----Markko27 (talk) 21:38, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi Markko27,

I didn't mean that you took it from this site; possibly they used your image.

The problem is that the depicted map itself is likely copyrighted. As Italy has no freedom-of-panorama exception, we need a permission from the creator of this map. --Túrelio (talk) 22:15, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Ping

Hello, do you receive notifications from {{Ping}}?! you have written in above that "ATTENTION: Please use my talk page rather than emailing me." is this including {{Ping}} too?!--Editor-1 (talk) 04:51, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

in theory yes. But currently I'm a bit overworked and have a lot of "pings". File version deleted, as requested. --Túrelio (talk) 06:58, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

 Thank you.--Editor-1 (talk) 15:07, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Re-uploaded files

Hello, all of the files that were deleted from here for copyrights infringement have been re-uploaded. Is that part of some OTRS related agreement or is it just the user's own initiative to re-upload everything that was deleted? --Glorious 93 (talk) 07:29, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Taken care of. --Túrelio (talk) 07:45, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Global Perspective Analytical Forum.png

Moin Turélio,

kannst Du die Datei bitte wiederherstellen? Beim OTRS liegt eine Freigabeerklärung vor.

Vielen Dank! --Mussklprozz (talk) 10:24, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:59, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Danke. Von einer anderen OTRS-Agentin gab es jetzt nocht eine Rückfrage, die sich aber nicht auf die Lizenz bezog. Die ist m. E. in Ordnung. Ich habe fürs Erste nur einen OTRS-received-Baustein reingesetzt. --Mussklprozz (talk) 23:16, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Löschungen

Hallo Túrelio, nach der Diskussion Gestern, habe ich mich mal hinter den neuen Uploads gemacht. Die Ergebnise davon hast du heute großteils gelöscht, danke dafür! Meine Frage ist, ob das was ich mache hilfreich ist oder doch schon an Spam/Vandalismus grenzt. Grüße Oesterreicher12 (talk) 11:44, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi Oesterreicher12,

keine Sorge. Das Kontrollieren der neuesten Uploads ist eine unverzichtbare Aufgabe, die dank des Nichtstuns der WMF und des Widerstands einiger Benutzer leider manuell gemacht werden muss. --Túrelio (talk) 15:46, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Porque apagou minha foto?

A foto é para ser usada em dados no Wikipédia — Preceding unsigned comment added by BatistaDi (talk • contribs)

Please sign your comments always.

I assume you are talking about File:Divino B'Atista.jpg, right? Well, this image was considered to be out of the scope of Commons. All your uploads so far, show only yourself. That may be o.k. for Facebook, but not for Commons. Regular contributors may upload 2 or 3 merely personal images. But all your uploads falls into that category. --Túrelio (talk) 14:18, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Copyvios

Hello Túrelio, while patrolling I came across these user uploads which I tagged for csd. But I'm not sure about few files. Please have a look here when you're free. Thanks, stay safe. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 07:42, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Crie uma página pra mim?

Olá, eu sou escritor e cantor, e gostaria de ter uma página mais específica com biografia. Se Puder, segue abaixo os dados para a criação da página.--BatistaDi (talk) 09:54, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Divino B'Atista é goiano, nascido em 01 de agosto de 1995 em Ceres / GO, mas cresceu em Porangatu (onde passou grande parte da infância).

Seus livros mais conhecidos, são: “No Último Volume” (2015), a trilogia em co-parceria da autora Malu P. Magalhães: “Três Dias Com Ele” (2018), e a trilogia "Apaixonada Por Um Idiota" (2014), marcando sua estreia na literatura.

Todos os títulos anteriores foram traduzidos para o Inglês, Espanhol e Italiano.

Sua carreira como escritor surgiu logo após uma publicação gratuita de um dos seus livros independentes na plataforma do Wattpad, em 2014, o que rendeu um contrato com uma editora em poucos dias. Contudo, a publicação não aconteceu, já que editora ainda estava crescendo no mercado editorial.

Migrando para outra plataforma digital, a Amazon, viu seus livros crescerem e ganhar um novo patamar.

Atualmente, se denomina como autor independente.

Sua carreira na música surgiu devido ao sonho de dar voz as canções escritas por ele mesmo (em sua maioria para os personagens que sempre acabam envolvidos nesse universo) em seu livros.

Decidido a focar nessas áreas, agora, o investimento também faz parte de sua carreira profissional.

Obras publicadas

• "Apaixonada Por Um Idiota" (versão independente), publicado em 2014.

• “Apaixonada Por Um Idiota” - publicado em 2014 pela editora Clube de Autores.

• “Merry Christmas: Contos Natalinos”, publicado em 2015 pela editora Percurso.

• "No Último Volume", publicado em 2016 pela editora Clube de Autores.

• “In Love With A Fool" (English Edition), publicado em 2016.

• “Innamorata di un IDIOTA!" (Italian Edition), publicado em 2016.

• "Três Dias Com Ele" publicado em 2017 pela editora Clube de Autores.

• “Três Dias Com Ela”, publicado em 2017 pela editora Clube de Autores.

• “Ruim Pra Mim”, publicada em 2018 pela editora Clube de Autores.

• "No Último Volume", (Segunda Edição) publicado em 2018 pela editora Clube de Autores.

• “Merry Christmas: Contos Natalinos”, (Segunda Edição) publicado em 2018 pela editora Clube de Autores.

• "No Simples Compasso da Paixão - Primeiro Episódio", publicado em 2018 pela Clube de Autores.

• “In The Simple Compass of Passion" (English Edition), publicado em 2019.

• “Apasionada por un idiota" (Spanish Edition), publicado em 2019.

• “En El Último Volumen" (Spanish Edition), publicado em 2019.

• “A Tutto Volume" (Italian Edition), publicado em 2019.

• “Tre Giorni Con Lui" (Italian Edition), publicado em 2019.

• “Tre Giorni Con Lei" (Italian Edition), publicado em 2019.

• “Foi Como Andar de Bicicleta”, publicado em 2019 pela editora Clube de Autores.

• “Merry Christmas 2: Contos Natalinos”, publicado em 2019 pela editora Clube de Autores.

• “Three Days With Her" (English Edition), publicado em 2020.

• “Tres Días con Ella" (Spanish Edition), publicado em 2020.

• “Bad for me" (English Edition), publicado em 2020.

• “Contos (D)Escritos Para Serem Lidos Por Você”, publicado em 2020 pela editora Clube de Autores.

• “Casa Comigo Nesse Natal?” (versão estendida), publicado em 2020 pela editora Clube de Autores.

"Fonte: <https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/17201604.Divino_B_Atista>"

"Fonte: <https://clubedeautores.com.br/livros/autores/divino-b-atista>"

"Fonte: <https://www.amazon.com.br/Livros-Divino-BAtista/s?rh=n%3A6740748011%2Cp_lbr_books_authors_browse-bin%3ADivino+B%27Atista>" — Preceding unsigned comment added by BatistaDi (talk • contribs)

Hi BatistaDi,

sorry, but I don't read Portuguese. Anyway, it seems that you think Wikimedia-Commons oder Wikipedia is like Facebook or alike. Well, it is not. People may have an article on Wikipedia when they fulfil the Wikipedia's notability criteria. --Túrelio (talk) 14:11, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Andrea_Palma

Hi Túrelio, is it okay to restore? There is at lease 1 image now. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 12:33, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 14:11, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I am a singer and writer, and I would like to merge the data into one page.

--BatistaDi (talk) 19:55, 22 September 2020 (UTC)Hello, I am a singer and writer, and I would like to merge the data into one page.--BatistaDi (talk) 19:55, 22 September 2020 (UTC)--BatistaDi (talk) 19:55, 22 September 2020 (UTC)--BatistaDi (talk) 19:55, 22 September 2020 (UTC) I don't want to PROMOTE myself, I just need the page for acceptance and notoriety before society. If possible, could you please do that? I have all the necessary sources I need to confirm data.

File to use on the PAGE: "Divino B'Atista is from Goiás, born on August 1, 1995 in Ceres / GO, but started in Porangatu (where he spent most of his childhood).

His best-known books are: “No Último Volume” (2015), a co-partnership trilogy by the author Malu P. Magalhães: “Três Dias Com Ele” (2018), and the trilogy "Apaixonada Para Um Idiota" (2014) ), marking its debut in literature.

All previous titles have been translated into English, Spanish and Italian.

His career as a writer came shortly after a free publication of one of his independent books on the Wattpad platform in 2014, which earned him a contract with a publisher in a few days. However, the publication did not happen, since the publisher was still growing in the publishing market.

Migrating to another digital platform, Amazon, saw his books grow and gain new heights.

Currently, he calls himself an independent author.

His music career came about due to his dream of giving voice as songs written by himself (mostly for the characters who always end up involved in this universe) in his books.

Decided to focus on these areas, investment is now part of his professional career.

Published works

• "In Love With An Idiot" (independent version), published in 2014.

• “Apaixonada Para Um Idiota” - published in 2014 by Clube de Autores.

• “Merry Christmas: Contos Natalinos”, published in 2015 by the publisher Percurso.

• “In The Las Volume”, published in 2016 by Clube de Autores publisher.

• “In Love With A Fool” (English edition), published in 2016.

• “Innamorata di un IDIOTA!” (Italian edition), published in 2016.

• "Três Dias Com Ele" published in 2017 by Clube de Autores.

• “Três Dias Com Ela”, published in 2017 by the Clube de Autores publisher.

• “Ruim Pra Mim”, published in 2018 by Clube de Autores publisher.

• "In The Las Volume", (Second Edition) published in 2018 by Clube de Autores.

• “Merry Christmas: Contos Natalinos”, (Second Edition) published in 2018 by Clube de Autores publisher.

• “In The Simple Compass of Passion - First Episode”, published in 2018 by Clube de Autores.

• “In The Simple Compass of Passion - First Episode” (English edition), published in 2019.

• “Apasionada por un idiota” (Spanish edition), published in 2019.

• “En El Último Volumen” (Spanish edition), published in 2019.

• “A Tutto Volume" (Italian edition), published in 2019.

• “Tre Giorni Con Lui” (Italian edition), published in 2019.

• “Tre Giorni Con Lei” (Italian edition), published in 2019.

• “It was like riding a bicycle”, published in 2019 by Clube de Autores.

• “Merry Christmas 2: Contos Natalinos”, published in 2019 by Clube de Autores.

• “Three Days With Her” (English edition), published in 2020.

• “Tres Días con Ella” (Spanish edition), published in 2020.

• “Bad for me" (English edition), published in 2020.

• “Tales (D) Written to Be Read by You”, published in 2020 by Clube de Autores publisher.

• "Will you come home with me this Christmas?" (extended version), published in 2020 by the publisher Clube de Autores.

"Source: <https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/17201604.Divino_B_Atista>" "Source: <https://clubedeautores.com.br/livros/autores/divino-b-atista>" "Source: <https://www.amazon.com.br/Livros-Divino-BAtista/s?rh=n%3A6740748011%2Cp_lbr_books_authors_browse-bin%3ADivino+B%27Atista>" -  

Hi BatistaDi,

you are here at Wikimedia-Commons, not Wikipedia. Commons is just a depository for files. Wikipedia is where you want to go. And no, I cannot write an article about you, I don't have time für that. I am just an unpaid volunteer, elected to do administratory work here on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 06:39, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

[[27]]

Um... PNG is lossless, JPEG is preferred for thumbnailing on Wikipedia. I think we've talked about this before - that's not an accusation; this deletion was way back a year ago, but as I think you know, you're not meant to delete the lossless versions, because if any more edits are needed, JPEGs will progressively lose quality, but PNGs won't. Could you please restore it? Thanks! Adam Cuerden (talk) 04:49, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:30, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:19, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Relevanz in Commons

Hallo Turelio, ich sehe immer wieder, dass du Fotos löscht oder LA anbringst, mit der Begründung Artikel in WP-de gelöscht. Seit wann ist das Bedingung, dass es in WP-de einen Artikel gibt? - In vielen Fällen österreichischer Artikel übernehmen wir die Artikel in das von WMAT u.a. dafür betriebenen RegiowikiAT, dazu gibt es auch meist einen DS in WD - also seit wann macht WP-de eine Relevanz in Commons, bzw. umgekehrt, verliert ein Foto Relevanz, wenn es keinen Artikel gibt. Da sehe ich keinen wie immer gearteten Zusammenhang. ---- K@rl (talk) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 12:00, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi Karl,

also, dass ich selbst einen LA mit dieser Begründung stelle, kann ich nahezu ausschließen. Seit einigen Monaten werden allerdings vermehrt SLAs von Dritten auf Fotos von "Selbstdarstellern" gestellt, die z.B. auf Wikidata einen Eintrag für sich anlegen, weil auf den Wikipedien keine Chance besteht. Dabei handelt es sich aber üblicherweise nicht um Personen, die für :de oder das erwähnte RegioWiki auch nur infrage kämen. Insofern beziehst du dich sicher nicht auf diese. Wenn mal wieder viele SLAs anstehen, kann es wohl passieren, dass ich die vom Nominierenden eingetragene Löschbegründung einfach übernehme, statt sie auf meine Einschätzung zu korrigieren.(nicht selten besteht da auch URV-Verdacht) Das ist dann, zugegeben, meine Bequemlichkeit. Falls du also eine konkrete Datei vor Augen hast, nur her damit. Ich bin da rel. undogmatisch. --Túrelio (talk) 14:45, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Okay, im speziellen handelt es sich um den Artikel Ameliy mit dem zugegebenerweise nicht optimalen Foto File:Ameliy.jpg - Allerdings möchte ich da den Autor um ein besseres bitten, was natürlich einfacher geht, wenn das alte net unbedingt gleich ungeschaut gelöscht wird. Einen ähnlichen Problemfall habe ich allerdings mit dem Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo-wetscher.jpg, das nicht in dein Resort fällt, aber ich mich mit meinem schwachen englisch leider nicht wehren konnte. Auch hier war die Löschbegründung u.a. Artikel in WP gelöscht. danke für das Verständnis -- K@rl (talk) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 15:20, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Ameliy.jpg ist tatsächlich so ein Fall, wie oben am Ende meiner AW beschrieben. Für mich war das, was in der edit-summary unter 2) steht, maßgeblich. Allerdings hat die Dame derzeit auch auf regiowiki.at keinen Artikel. Leg den doch mal an und gib mir kurz Bescheid, dann stell ich das Bild erstmal wieder her. Danach müsste allerdings die Genehmigung/Lizenz bestätigt werden.

Das Logo File:Logo-wetscher.jpg hatte ich ja mal zu retten versucht, siehe frühe Versionsgeschichte. --Túrelio (talk) 16:29, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, aber den Link für Amelyi hab ic h dir oben rein geschrieben, siehe hier https://regiowiki.at/index.php?title=Ameliy , die Rettung von Wetscher kann ich nicht sehen, da ich nihcht Admin bin. Ein neuer Fall: File:60. Geburtstag der Nationalratspräsidentin Barbara Prammer (11869704436).jpg Dieser Fotograf stellt prinzipiell alle Fotos der SPÖ auf Flickr unter freie Lizenz, es gibt auch genug von ihm hier. ---- K@rl (talk) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 20:45, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Es wird zu viel und zu schnell gelöscht. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Parker, Natalia.jpg ist das Bild einer Selbstdarsellerin aber es ist benutzbar. Dieses konkrete Bild ist unwichtig aber typisch. Warum sollte das gelöscht werden? --Ralf Roletschek 21:10, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Vorher hatte der RegioWiki-Link nicht funktioniert, jetzt doch. Hab File:Ameliy.jpg erstmal entlöscht. Da das Foto aber auch auf Facebook mit "© Lightleaksvisuals" gezeichnet ist, muss eine Bestätigung/Lizenz vom Rechteinhaber an OTRS gehen. --Túrelio (talk) 21:51, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Okay, dann lösche es gleich, ich lasse es aus dem artikel heraus. Ob ich die Agentur noch drauf anrede, muss ich noch überlegen. Und sorry wegen der Störung und nix für ungut. Wegen dieser URV hätte ich es gleich verstanden. aber so ist es ja geklärt. --lg -- K@rl (talk) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 15:13, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Laborate Logo.png

Hi Túrelio. Can you check to see if this file is the same as File:Laborate hr Logo.jpg that you deleted a few days ago. Same uploader and they might've just re-uploaded the file after the other one had been deleted. I'm not sure if it meets COM:TOO India, but I'm pretty sure it's not "own work". -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:56, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi Marchjuly,

you are right. It's indeed the same image, even though the uploader has added more non-copyright legal information. I've added a company-source for the logo-symbol and the upper line. As the proper way to legalize it on Commons, would be to obtain a permission from the rightsholder, we can let the current no-permission-process run its course. --Túrelio (talk) 08:17, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for taking a look at this. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:27, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Old Deletion Requests

Hello. Since you are the admin who have been processing all of my deletion requests, I have a favor to ask. Could you take care of the following duplicate deletion requests for me? They are from weeks ago.

• Commons:Deletion requests/File:Edgar Degas - Amarillo y Rosa.jpg
• Commons:Deletion requests/File:Reverend Robert Walker (1755 - 1808) Skating on Duddingston Loch.png
• Commons:Deletion requests/File:Degas - Violinist, Study for The Dance Lesson, ca. 1878–79.jpg

I would really appreciate your assistance. Thank you. StellarHalo (talk) 10:44, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

 Done for 2 of them. --Túrelio (talk) 19:11, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Unberechtigte Löschung zweier Fotos

Hallo, wie ich festgestellt habe, haben Sie heute zwei Fotos mit den Namen "Danksagung IGS.jpg und "Danksagung INIO.jpg" unbrechtigterweise gelöscht. Beide Fotos waren von mir von dem Original Preisverleihungsdokumenten an Herr Prof. Dr. Hossein Zomorrodian im Iran abgebildet. Die Preisverleihung war im Iran eine öffentliche Veranstaltung und die Originaldokumente wurden dem Publikum präsentiert. Ferner waren die Originaldokumente nach der Preisverleihung im Besitz und somit das Eigentum der oben genannten Person. Als Nachlassverwalter von Prof. Dr. Zomorrodian bin ich von ihm befügt, das Material zu verwalten, abzubilden und auch im Intrnet zu veröffentlichen. Diese Fotos sind für die Wikipediaseite von der genannten Person in persisch vorgesehen und ich habe sogar auch vor der Preisverleihung die Zustimmung der beiden Preisverleiher, indem Fall: "die geophysikalische Gesellschaft im Iran" (IGS) und "das Institut für Ozianographie und Meterologie" im Iran (INIO) zusätzlich eingeholt. Könnten Sie mir bitte erklären, wer und mit welcher Begründung diese beide Fotos als nicht lizensiert eingestuft hat und gelöscht hat. Ich habe bei upload der Bilder, die von mir selbst von dem Original, die in meinem Besitz ist, gemacht worden sind, angegeben, dass ich der Inhaber und der Erzeuger der Bilder bin und über den nötigen Lizenz verfüge. Ferner habe ich bei den Diskussionen für die Fotos nochmal angegeben, dass diese lizensiert sind und fälschlicherweise zum Löschen markiert sind!, Weshalb wurden sie dann trotzdem gelöscht? Ich erwarte, dass die beiden Bilder wierder hergstellt werden! Danke! پژوهشگر تجربی (talk) 18:38, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Sowohl für File:Danksagung INIO.jpg als auch für File:Danksagung IGS.jpg gilt: das abfotographierte Original hat von seiner Gestaltung her ausreichend Schöpfungshöhe und ist daher als urheberrechtlich geschützt zu betrachten. Das Urheberrecht am Original hat diejenige Person, die es geschaffen bzw. entworfen hat, nicht der Besitzer des physischen Exemplars. Wenn Sie ein Gemälde z.B. von Pablo Picasso käuflich erwerben, dann gehört Ihnen nur dieses physische Exemplar; sie dürfen davon aber keine Vervielfältigung (z.B. Foto) erstellen und öffentlich verbreiten. Dies würde die ausdrückliche Genehmigung von Picasso erfordern. Das gilt analog für die o.g. Urkunden.

D.h., die beiden Fotos unterliegen 2 unterschiedlichen Urheberrechten, dem des Schöpfers des Originals und dem des Fotografen.

Wenn Sie die Fotos selbst aufgenommmen haben, haben Sie Ihre Genehmigung mit dem Hochladen unter einer freien Lizenz bereits erteilt.

Dann fehlt aber noch die erwähnte Genehmigung des Original-Urhebers. Sie müssen also zunächst herausfinden, wer das Original entworfen bzw. gemalt/gezeichnet hat. Diese Person sollte außerdem als Urheber genannt werden. Es kann sein, dass die preisverleihende Institution umfängliche Nutzungsrechte (copyright) vom Original-Urheber erworben hat oder dass dieser für die Institution arbeitet. In diesem Fall könnte auch die preisverleihende Institution eine solche Lizenz ausstellen. Diese müsste an das Supportteam (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org) gemailt werden. Dabei ist zu beachten, dass eine "Genehmigung für Wikipedia" nicht ausreicht, obwohl Sie das Foto nur dafür verwenden möchten, sondern dass eine generelle freie Lizenz (z.B. wie die von Ihnen gewählte) erteilt wird. --Túrelio (talk) 19:10, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Das Original ist von den beiden Instutionen entworfen und sie haben die copyright rechte an beiden Dokumenten. An welche Adresse soll die Email gehen? پژوهشگر تجربی (talk) 19:18, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

An das Supportteam (s.o.). Wir haben sogar eine Emailvorlage auf Persisch Commons:الگوهای ایمیل; vielleicht vereinfacht das den Vorgang. Ich weiß nicht genau was in der Pers. Vorlage steht. Ggf. müssen Sie den Text vorher ein wenig anpassen, in dem Sinne, dass die rechteinhabende Institution, die Genehmigung erteilt, Ihre fotographischen Abbildungen der Urkunden unter der gewählten freien Lizenz (Lizenz genau angeben, also z.B. CC-BY-SA 4.0) zu verbreiten. D.h., die Institution braucht nicht die Original-Urkunde selbst unter einer freien Lizenz freizugeben, sondern nur die von Ihnen erstellten Abbilder davon. --Túrelio (talk) 20:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

A favour?

Hi. I know that as an admin you are quite busy (I know because I contribute to it :) but would you still do me a favour? There are hundreds of football players (all men) in Category:Association football players from Turkey whom I need to take to Category:Men's association football players from Turkey, as I am tired of doing this one by one since weeks now. Please do not teach me a method which may look simple to you but I will probably not understand or be able to apply. I had the same difficulty with Category:Politicians of Turkey and Category:Male politicians of Turkey. Sometimes I ask myself: Who asked you to make "male cats" so that women will not look like a "subcat" of men? In the end they were made of men's ribs... :) Really, if you have a magic stick just touch the problem with it. Thanks a lot. --E4024 (talk) 20:46, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Uh oh. I am not the right person when it's about bots or bot-like operations. You might ask User:Fæ, who has very much knowledge and experience in this area. --Túrelio (talk) 21:21, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

I hope s/he reads your page. :) Thanks anyway, you always help everyone. --E4024 (talk) 21:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @E4024:  Done with Cat-a-lot and some help re the women.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 21:40, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Bitte um Hilfe

Kannst du bitte auf Commons:Deletion requests/File:Boersianer-Ingrid-08.jpg schauen, der LA schaut mir sehr komisch aus - danke -- K@rl (talk) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 20:54, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Nun ja, der LA-Steller hat schon irgendwo die richtige Nase. Die Uploads von Chieft1308, der vorher wohl unter anderem Namen firmierte, wirken insofern "verdächtig", dass sie mit mindestens 3 Kameramodellen verschiedener Hersteller aufgenommen wurden. Da ich allerdings stark vermute, dass er selbst bei/für die Zeitschrift Börsianer schreibt, dürfte er Journalist sein und kann ggf. auf einen Kamerapool zurückgreifen. Du könntest ihm einfach eine Email schicken (ist auf Benutzerseite verfügbar) und mal etwas vortasten, ohne ihm direkt etwas vorzuwerfen. In einem geschützten Rahmen fällt es ggf. leichter ehrlich zu antworten, falls es tatsächlich nicht seine eigenen Fotos sein sollten. --Túrelio (talk) 21:19, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Shirley Ze Yu Photo

Hello, regarding the photo you declined for Shirley Ze Yu where you said it is taken down because it was in ChinabigIdea's page on Facebook. But what I want to say the ChinabigIdea is own by Shirley Ze Yu, and that's why I got the image. In my personal thinking, if you take a photo of the person from his/her website or social media platform will be not considered as copyright because that person is the one that own it. Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 21:58, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi Abbas Kwarbai,

I don't know to which image/file you are relating to, as you have/had no uploads so far. --Túrelio (talk) 09:32, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Митрополит Ростислав (Гонт), Санкт-Петербург.jpg

This image (File:Митрополит Ростислав принял участие в торжественном Акте в честь нового учебного года в СПбДА.jpg) have the same source with the deleted image. Moreover, these images have a common author and are located in one album. And that image was defined as free. In addition, all labels on the pages of both images are the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RC-1841 (talk • contribs)

Yes, but despite of that, it has been licensed differently BY-ND[28], which is incompatible with Commons policy COM:L. --Túrelio (talk) 09:14, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

I'm sorry I didn't see this. I will try to be more vigilant in the future RC-1841 (talk) 11:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Wegkarte - Mecklenburger Kapellenweg.pdf

Hi, what about File:Logo Mecklenburger Kapellenweg.jpg which is a part from the same publication? --He3nry (talk) 14:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Category:Objects by provenience in the Metropolitan Museum of Art

Hi, your given cause for deltion was: "test page, accidental creation, or page containing nonsense or no valid content". So. I created this page in 2017. It was not an "accident". There was no "nonsense". The content was "valid". May the times are changing and the way how things becoming sorted are changing. This is OK then. But why, please explain me, why, you give such an defamatory and offensive cause for the deletion? Really, I don't think, my work deserve this. -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 20:13, 27 September 2020 (UTC) PS: gerne auch noch auf deutsch: Du hast das mit der Angabe eines ungemein beleidigenden Grundes gelöscht. Ich verstehe und akzeptiere, wenn sich manche Dinge verändert und man anders sortiert. Alles OK. Aber diese Kategorie war kein Unfall. Sie war kein Unsinn. Der dort gesammelte Inhalt war absolut valide. Warum löschst du also mit einer so ehrabschneidenden, beleidigenden Begründung? Wirklich, ich raffe es nicht.

Hi,

du meine Güte. Man kann auch etwas überempfindlich sein. 1) nicht ich habe die Kategorie zur Löschung markiert, sondern User:Ruff tuff cream puff. Die gewählte Löschrationale wird dabei automatisch in die edit-summary übertragen. Da ich heute zig leere Kategorien gelöscht habe, genau aus dem Grund, dass sie leer waren (CSD C2), ändere ich nicht jedesmal manuell die edit-summary. 2) Der hier vom SLA-Steller benutzte Löschgrund "CSD G1" ist einer der ganz offiziellen Criteria for speedy deletion. Da die Kat. leer war, hatte sie zumindest jetzt "no valid content", nämlich gar keinen. Das nun als "ungemein beleidigend" und "ehrabschneidend" zu etikettieren, dazu fällt mir nichts mehr ein. Anyway, ich habe den SLA-Steller aufgefordert, für solche Fälle in Zukunft CSD C2 statt CSD G1 zu nehmen.--Túrelio (talk) 21:41, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Transition swimrun.jpg

Moin Turélio,

kannst Du bitte die Datei wiederherstellen? Es liegt eine gültige Freigabe bei OTRS vor. Eventuell komme ich allerdings erst am Wochenende dazu, den Freigabevermerk einzutragen.

Danke und Gruß, --Mussklprozz (talk) 12:03, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

 Done; hab OTRS-Baustein hinzugefügt. --Túrelio (talk) 12:06, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Deleting picture published under Creative Commons license (CC BY 4.0)

Hello Túrelio!

(Excuse my English) There is the article published under a Creative Commons license (CC BY 4.0):

Fabien Burki, Andrew J. Roger, Matthew W. Brown, and Alastair G.B. Simpson. "The New Tree of Eukaryotes". Trends in Ecology & Evolution..

In particular, Permitted: Reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works.

• I had uploaded picture from that article:

  File:Eukaryotic_tree_of_life_(Burki_et_al_2020).jpg

• But You deleted the picture.

Isn't CC-BY-4.0 license suitable for Commons? --Olvin (talk) 18:28, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi Olvin,

you are right. Seems I overlooked that. Image restored now. --Túrelio (talk) 18:55, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank You. --Olvin (talk) 19:09, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

The new pictures of different mountaineers

They dont have a copyright, It is free to use and it is used by newspaper, books and also in news websites of Nepal like the himalayan time they are public photos lol they dont have copyright. Theres no such law in Nepal. Btw I live in Nepal. Dr. Bhola Prasad Rauniyar (talk) 20:34, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, but that's hard to believe. Nepal is not among the countries that did not sign the Berne Convention, see en:Berne_Convention#List_of_countries_and_regions_that_are_not_signatories_to_the_Berne_Convention. Besides, a number of your uploads, though taken from the sourced website, are actually from other sources, like Facebook. --Túrelio (talk) 20:37, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

I meant to say Nepal does have copyright laws But of course the things which are used in books and newspaper are not copyrighted and the vast majority of the pictures are from TheHimalayanTimes which is a national newspaper and newswebsite in Nepal. So i request you that I will review only the pictures of other than news sources cause news sources one are 100% copyright free like the himalayan times and other news websites which most of the picture have sources from news websites. So will you give me the pass for the news sources pictures? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr. Bhola Prasad Rauniyar (talk • contribs)

"things which are used in books and newspaper are not copyrighted" - sorry, no! Copyright is with the creator of the work, i.e., the photographer. He/She may grant a partial copyright to others, as do the users, who upload their own works to Commons. Publication of a work, online or offline, has no significance whether a work is copyrighted or not. If you want to upload a work/photography, created by someone else, you need to provide the evidence that he/she granted you a permission or released it under a free license. Where is the evidence that images in Himalayan Times are copyright-free? On Commons we take copyright rather serious, 1) out of respect for the authors and 2) not to expose re-users to the risk of persecution for copyright infringement.--Túrelio (talk) 20:52, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

But that photos shouldnt be copyrighted it is for a good will photos to represent there faces in wikipedia for their acheivements, why are you being so strict for a good will photos to represent there wikipedia pages, They all sherpas of Nepal. I dont think a person face is copyrighted their public face is shown to everybody not atleast in this case when it is used to represent their faces for a good faith edit for wikipedia. I have no way to confirm this since it is pandemic year and they live in the mountains of Nepal, how can I ask their permission?.Pls undesrtand the situation and give this a pass please. Also their is a law that you can record or click pictures in public since the person cannot put their privacy act their that is why all countries iclunding Nepal, U.S etc allow people take picture in puclic or record and that is a roght you dont have to take permission for that. Otherwise everybody can sue you if you post their video in public bwcause i dont think in every documentary people are walking here and there but novody ask their permision it is impossible to ask permission anyway and they put it on tv, isnt that violation of their copyright and privacy? ofcourse not, because it is protected by law to use their public video or picture for good faith things and not for bad things that includes making a public documentary or putting a good faith edit picture of them in wikipedia. Hope that you will understand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr. Bhola Prasad Rauniyar (talk • contribs)

.. why no reply?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr. Bhola Prasad Rauniyar (talk • contribs)

Because obviously the communication isn't working. Whatever I tried to explain to you was met with evasion to other non-relevant aspects. For example, in your last reply you suddenly went to the area of personality rights, which is of little relevance her and has no relevance at all for copyright. We could continue this discussion for years and your last word would still be "Couldn't we however ...". Look, I did not make the copyright laws. When you don't like them, you should go to the lawmakers of your country. On Commons we try to protect the rights of the authors/creators/photographers, based on written an case law, as well as the re-users from being taken to court for copyright infringement. Commons and Wikipedia are not newspapers or alike, for which there are a few exceptions from copyright in many countries.--Túrelio (talk) 07:32, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

[T]he fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. The photos are for fair use aka for news and showing their bio in wikipedia and jts not for commerical use. Idk why wikipedia litreally copyrights everything when the fair use definition isc — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr. Bhola Prasad Rauniyar (talk • contribs)

COM:Fair use material is not permitted on Commons for legal reasons; it must be uploaded locally, provided your project has an exception policy; see for example :en-policy en:Wikipedia:Non-free content.--Túrelio (talk) 07:39, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet

Hey,

I saw on [29] you blocked a user. Out of curiosity, I found that English WP has already identified them as a sockpuppet here: [30].

Is there any way to instantly check whether a user has been blocked on any of the wikipedias?

Egroeg5 (talk) 22:42, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi Egroeg5,

yes, admins can see the log-entries, which includes blocks on other projects. However, in case of 李王陈柳, I blocked them entirely for their local behaviour on Commons. Only thereafter I saw that they were already blocked on :en. --Túrelio (talk) 07:11, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Possible copyright violation?

Hi. Added an image yesterday which has been removed, with the note of possible copyright violation [31] To provide additional information, the author Ann Helms has specifically stated they offered, or donated, the image, to the public for public use, which I witnessed. The image has been used in a buddhist magazine, reproduced as a photograph on buddhist calendars that were sold to the public, and used in related website(s) of Padmasambhava Buddhist Center, based in the U.S. The author has not received any financial benefit from these sales or uses, and has not retained copyrights. The image has also been reproduced in quantities periodically and offered as individual photos for sale to the public. After loading image into Wikimedia yesterday, a lack of internet connection made locating the specific PBC url for the image impossible - thus, the main url to PBC was added to the description template. It appears a link to the image has been found by Wikimedia, but I'll add the specific download url to this topic asap. Does this additional information satisfy the concerns? Thanks. Pasdecomplot (talk) 08:18, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi Pasdecomplot,

before tagging and deleting the image, I had read the description. However, it didn't convince me, as nowhere there was a statement from the author of releasing the copyright. You do not loose your copyright when a work is published. If you think you have real evidence that the image might a free, I am willing to undelete and put it into a regular deletion-discussion, which gives you the opportunity to present your rationale to the community. --Túrelio (talk) 08:34, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for responding. Yes, there is real evidence that the image is free. Here's a quotation from the author Ann Helms, a student of Khenchen Palden Sherab Rinpoche, made in the early 2000's: Yes, I took the picture, when Khen Rinpoche was [in Colorado]. I offered it to the dharmakaya. [Statement made with a smile and an upward gesture of hands and arms]. The statement evidences the author has removed all ownership claims, or copyright claims, since the concept of ownership does not exist in the dharmakaya, nor do any other concepts since it can be described as the source of the energy behind the magical display of all apparent phenomena. The author was clearly indicating their release of all ownership claims, and evidencing their understanding that they were rejecting the concept of ownership of the image.

Adhering to good faith policy and respect for the encyclopedia, I wouldn't have added the image if the author hadn't released the copyright. Is this sufficient for our needs? Pasdecomplot (talk) 09:24, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Continue the discussion (and present your rationales/evidences) in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Khenchen Palden Sherab Rinpoche.jpeg. --Túrelio (talk) 10:21, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Ok. But may I ask which user has a problem with the copyright? Or why? It's hard to have a discussion when the topic, or specific objection, isn't clear. Is the provided statement not sufficient for you, or for other editors? If it isn't sufficient for you, might you clarify? Thanks again. Pasdecomplot (talk) 10:47, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

So, it's the only discussion there, which answers one of the above questions. Since I don't have as much experience, I wonder if other editors normally review the discussions there? Thanks again. Pasdecomplot (talk) 11:32, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

The above linked discussion-page is a deletion-discussion. It will be open for quite a while, at least 1 week, until another admin decides it. I will not decide it, as I have opened it. The question is not "which user has a problem with the copyright". As I have explained above, the creator of a work automatically has the copyright and it lasts until 70 years after his/her death! The creator/author can give others a permission (license) to use his work. However, if somebody claims "I have a permission", it is his duty to provide the evidence. --Túrelio (talk) 11:54, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

If the quotation from the author isn't convincing enough, which could have been explicitly stated before the discussion was sent to the notice board, there's no reason for the discussion to be posted on the notice board: The author is likely still on permanent retreat, and is a private person, as are others that would get involved in order to gain some kind of written statement that might or might not be more satisfying than the quotation from the author. Likewise, it's like an outing expedition. So, again, if the previous factual quotation is not for some reason sufficient, let's stop whatever process has been needlessly started. Thanks so much for your attention. Pasdecomplot (talk) 14:35, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you !

Hi, thank you very much for having helped me today deleting pictures that were not free of lisence. Yours faithfully --Faqscl (talk) 10:44, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 06:29, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

restore the Category

Hello Túrelio, can you please restore the Category:Parth Samthaan. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 05:00, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:28, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For the great job you are doing deleting copyvio images. Your tireless contribution is appreciated. Thanks. SirEdimon Dimmi!!! 07:23, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

images deletion

I want to delete images from wikipedia. I did not know where should I insert the code. Can You help me? Kinga

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 12:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi

Hi there. Return of the LTA. Danke. --E4024 (talk) 20:46, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned subtitles

Hi Túrelio! Thanks for deleting a number of orphaned subtitle pages that I tagged earlier. Unfortunately you appear to have missed the other language versions of those subtitles (which I noted explicitly in the speedy deletion template, and which are similarly orphaned). If you could delete those as well, that would be wonderful. Mahir256 (talk) 13:39, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

as I'm not a translation-admin, I have no idea how to access these other language-versions of talkpages. --Túrelio (talk) 14:29, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

You need not be a translation admin to change the language tag in the name of a TimedText: page: the Bulgarian version of these Arabic subtitles is TimedText talk:Verifiability and Neutral point of view (Common Craft)-en.ogv.bg.srt (see the "bg" at the end?). The other language subtitles can be accessed by adjusting the language code accordingly. Hope that helps. Mahir256 (talk) 15:09, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

I should also note that my deletion requests were added to the talk pages of these subtitles, with the specific goal of getting those subtitles deleted, on the assumption that those templates would not render properly on the subtitle pages themselves. Mahir256 (talk) 15:11, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Copyvio de Vivian Maier

Bonjour Túrelio, j’ai signalé cette autoportrait de Vivian Maier comme copyvio en mai 2020, mais visiblement cela n’intéresse personne… Pouvez vous faire quelque chose ? Merci, cordialement, --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 10:33, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

 Done. Regards. --Túrelio (talk) 11:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup pour la mémoire de Vivian Maier ! --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 12:01, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

David Neuhaus

you allowed yourself to remove David Neuhaus's photo while it was himself who provided him for his Wikipedia page!!! Yannick Pichard (talk) 15:05, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

as you have many deleted files already, are you talking about File:David Neuhaus.jpg? If yes: when he "provided it", why did you write "own work" of Yannick Pichard? Anyway, if he has shot it really by himself or has obtained enough copyright from the photographer, he needs to send a statement of permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org which confirms the release of the image under the choosen free license. You find a text-template at: Commons:Email_templates#Email_message_template_for_release_of_rights_to_a_file. --Túrelio (talk) 15:08, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks so much for your help. I have given permission regarding 2 files on the Lupton family wikipedia page via email as suggested. Srbernadette (talk) 02:30, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Image deleted from entry when in investigation in wikicommons

Please, remove the deletion of my photograph pinephone.jpg ( https://ca.wikipedia.org/wiki/PinePhone ). This image was labeled as 'copyright violation' but is not. I am currently discussing this with Эlcobbola the issue. The image is from FOSS GNU/Linux and it is free to use. The image has not been removed fropm Wiki Commons and is only suspected to violate the copyright. I am explaining Эlcobbola the reasons is not violating the copyright. by Daniel Barcelona Oct-12-2020 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Barcelona (talk • contribs)

Hi, I've restored the image and immediately put it into a regular DR to allow for discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 20:02, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

thanks Daniel Barcelona Daniel Barcelona (talk) 20:09, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello. Please see my discussion here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Elcobbola#File%3APinephone.jpg I think my case is very clear, and the deletion tag should be removed, so I can restore the image to the entry. It is not clear to me if I have to clarify this case with you or with Elcobbola. Thank you.Daniel Barcelona (talk) 15:58, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi, neither nor. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pinephone.jpg is the place for the discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 16:13, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the answer. This is too complicated. Can I put my picture back? or how long do I have to wait to put it back? Am I doing anything bad putting it back now? or do I have to wait until this clarifies? if so, how long it takes? I need some help here. thanks. Daniel Barcelona (talk) 16:35, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

"This is too complicated." How? Instead of posting your arguments/points on 2 talkpages, you now have 1 place for it and even can involve other users. Anyway, that's the way it is done here. Such a DR is usually open for at least 1 week. Thereafter it an admin will decide keep or delete and close it (this will not be me, as I opened this DR). --Túrelio (talk) 18:22, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

I felt like a yo-yo going from one admin to another one, now a third one. Ok, lets see now. Thanks for your answer. Best. Daniel Barcelona (talk) 19:59, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

I am still waiting. More than a week now. I guess you and Elcobbola could take action since you are the ones that start all this issue. Any help is welcome. Thanks 129.49.252.248 14:58, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

You really need patience. We have DRs that are open for many months. Besides, I told you already that I cannot close this DR, as I have opened it. So, you should ask Elcobbola or another admin. --Túrelio (talk) 20:59, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Ok, I misunderstood. I thought the wait was for a week. I will wait then. I ll ask Elcobbola. Thanks.Daniel Barcelona (talk) 23:24, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

*** no photo copyrigth violation!!!

Dear Turelio,

my added photo is NOT COPYRIGTH VIOLATION, because this is my own photo! who in in the picture is me!

this is my fair visit photo, you can see visitor card on my chest...

there is no copyright violation!!

regards Orhancengizk

Photo: OCKveJNG90.jpg link : https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/MKEK_JNG-90 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orhancengizk (talk • contribs)

Hi Orhancengizk,

image File:OCKveJNG90.jpg is neither tagged for deleted.

What has been deleted resp. redirected to File:OCKveJNG90.jpg was image File:Bora jng-90 Fuar.jpg. The reason it was suspected as copyvio was that it contained Facebook-code in its metadata, which the other image does not. The now deleted image was anyway identical (somewhat cropped) to the remaining one. --Túrelio (talk) 21:13, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

hola

Hola turelio, acabo de subir una foto que es de dominio publico pero me la marcaron como que no y la estamos usando en la wikipedia en español y vamos a subirla a la wikipedia en italiano, acabo de mandar un mail pero realmente tengo dudas de si eso es asi, te pido por favor tu ayuda no se como hacerlo bien la foto es la siguiente

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Carloacutis.jpg

En flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/146857093@N05/49697934528/in/photolist-75y172-kXCBkF-kXDfBx-2iHCUu9-75y1bi-qeDg4E-2huVPox-2huVPp9-2huWPvW-2huVPpV-2huVPBZ-2huVPrP-2huVPk6-2huWPrC-2huT5ZR-2huT5ZA-2huWPBT-2huWPtM-2huT63G-2huT64o-2huT617-2huT5UL-2huWPzP-2huT62E-2huWPzD-JJhmr3-2huT65F-2huT65W-2huT68g-2huT662-2huVPAg-2huVPnL-2huT68b-2huVPz9-2huWPJm-2huWPHz-2huVPwd-JLxC2t-2gHKoyo-WMEXZx-2iMN4Vg-2huVPnf-ow8uaE-2iMN2bU-2iMSwdh-2iMSwgD-odsRbL-2jMe783-otexNs-ftWRqS

Muchas gracias por tu ayuda

Hello turelio, I just uploaded a photo that is in the public domain but they marked it as no and we are using it in the wikipedia in Spanish and we are going to upload it to the wikipedia in Italian, I just sent an email but I really have doubts about whether That is so, I ask you please your help I do not know how to do it well the photo is the following

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Carloacutis.jpg

https://www.flickr.com/photos/146857093@N05/49697934528/in/photolist-75y172-kXCBkF-kXDfBx-2iHCUu9-75y1bi-qeDg4E-2huVPox-2huVPp9-2huWPvW-2huVPpV-2huVPBZ-2huVPrP-2huVPk6-2huWPrC-2huT5ZR-2huT5ZA-2huWPBT-2huWPtM-2huT63G-2huT64o-2huT617-2huT5UL-2huWPzP-2huT62E-2huWPzD-JJhmr3-2huT65F-2huT65W-2huT68g-2huT662-2huVPAg-2huVPnL-2huT68b-2huVPz9-2huWPJm-2huWPHz-2huVPwd-JLxC2t-2gHKoyo-WMEXZx-2iMN4Vg-2huVPnf-ow8uaE-2iMN2bU-2iMSwdh-2iMSwgD-odsRbL-2jMe783-otexNs-ftWRqS

Thank you very much for your help--Gafr89 (talk) 11:46, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

File:President Clinton and Prime Minister John Major of the United Kingdom deliver press statements.jpg

Hi Túrelio. Can you possible restore this file (which you redirected as a duplicate), given that this one is older than the file it was redirected to, which should itself be redirected to said older file? Thanks, ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 11:47, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi Alban, o.k. I've reverted the dupe-direction. --Túrelio (talk) 13:46, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

画像の復旧

https://www.instagram.com/p/CClVjdrnSTW/

これは私が撮影した画像で著作権は私です。

https://ja.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/葵井えりか

元データ、エビデンスもあるので削除した画像を復旧してください。

Ystk911 Ystk911 (talk) 01:14, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

More deletion requests

Could you please also process the following deletion requests?

• Commons:Deletion requests/File:Édouard Manet - Femme au fichu noir.jpg
• Commons:Deletion requests/File:Édouard Manet - Lecture de l'illustré.jpg

Another admin removed the duplicate tags and so they probably were not visible for you to easily process them. StellarHalo (talk) 01:57, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Robert Evans' pic

Hello, and thank you for your message. I am trying to reach him to obtain permission but if the photo must come down in the meantime, c'est la vie. Cheers,--Kalli13 (talk) 01:30, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Notice

Hello, Túrelio. You have new messages at 轻语者's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I don’t know if you have received the reminder. I have responded to your question on my talk page. --轻语者 (talk) 14:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Deletion of PNGs as 'superseded' by SVGs?

Is this no Commons policy? We never used to do this. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:51, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi, as File:Ullensaker kart.png was very small and as File:NO 0235 Ullensaker.svg offers the map in png format anyway, I didn't see it as a loss. However, I have to confess that I overlooked your revert of Worldlydev's edit, which I saw only now. Do you want to have this one undeleted? --Túrelio (talk) 10:07, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Ah, Worldydev! I was trying to remember that name. I've raised this at VP.

It was only small because they were reverting the large version to a small version before tagging it for deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:13, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

I've restored File:Ullensaker kart.png now. --Túrelio (talk) 10:25, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Blocked user

User:Sivasaamy seems to have reappeared. User:Messi leo00010 today upload some of the same images. Also, could you remove file File:Jackson-Pollock-The-She-Wolf-S.jpg and File:PORTRAIT AND A DREAM BY JACKSON POLLOCK (1912-1956, UNITED STATES)Jackson-Pollock-Portrait-and-a-Dream.jpg? Coldcreation (talk) 12:47, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. SP blocked and copyvios deleted. --Túrelio (talk) 13:19, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Category:Beautiful Caucasian women

Hi admin. Discussion is democratic and it's good when we discuss something useful. However, Category:Beautiful Caucasian women is sheer nonsense and we will only be losing time with its discussion. Thanks for your possible initiative on this. --E4024 (talk) 14:55, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:56, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

SCP Secret Laboratory.jpg

Hello, I was checking through the article w:SCP - Secret Laboratory on Wikipedia. I noticed there was no file, so I went to update the game banner here, only to find out that it was deleted for Copyright violation. On the official Steam page of the game (https://store.steampowered.com/app/700330/SCP_Secret_Laboratory/) it licenses the game and its' items under CC-BY-SA 3.0. Therefore, I think the file should be undeleted as File:SCP - Containment Breach.jpg has the same licensing and is not deleted. Rafplayz001 (talk) 13:35, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

to understand you correctly, you are referring to File:SCP-SL_Logo.jpg, right? However, this file is only requested for deletion, but not yet deleted. You should provide your opinion/rationale in the deletion-discussion.--Túrelio (talk) 18:22, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

I did not know there was a deletion discussion happening to an identical image, I was talking about the one you deleted a year ago, (File:SCP_Secret_Laboratory.jpg) but thanks for directing me in the right direction. Rafplayz001 (talk) 13:06, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

"Images of low quality" or whose fault?

Why is a warning issued to a user who edited a file labeled "Images of low quality" and labeled "under the Creative Commons Attribution license.", Which later turned out to be not free, and not just the user who uploaded this file? And how are you ordered to edit already uploaded images not by me, when there is a risk of getting a warning and being blocked? This is the file File:9C2E140F-5CAA-4257-AC3jamescharles makeup artist.jpg, which I just scaled. Thanks in advance for the clarification! --Artemmalkin (talk) 09:30, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

that happens per default by the script activated when a file is tagged as copyvio-suspected. In this case both uploaders received this warning. You don't get blocked for 1 copyvio-suspected-upload. By the way: where did you get the higher-resolution version, which you have uploaded? I am asking this not for forensic reasons, but considering that you uploaded a number of "up-scaled" images today. --Túrelio (talk) 10:31, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your reply! I use two image manipulation applications: Adobe Photoshop (retouch) and Topaz Gigapixel AI (scale). I am looking for low resolution images or with the category "Images for cleanup" on WikimediaCommons. Here in this category I found the above image. --Artemmalkin (talk) 11:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Ok. However, when uploading these upscaled versions, please note that normally you should not overwrite the existing file-version, per Commons:Overwriting_existing_files#Exceptions_to_the_minor_changes_rule. --Túrelio (talk) 20:55, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, unfortunately I did not see this information, I took note --Artemmalkin (talk) 06:29, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

File:China-pyramid-1982-en.svg

Why don't this file deleted? Nothing is linked to it. I'm uploading new version by https://svgtranslate.toolforge.org and I thought the original language is replaced by English so I created that file, however after that I realized that the file would have different language when it linked in Wikipedia and separate file isn't needed. Hddty (talk) 15:30, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Ähem, File:China-pyramid-1982-en.svg is deleted. However, a redirect[32] has been placed on it, to File:China-pyramid-1982.svg. You had reqested that by yourself[33]. --Túrelio (talk) 15:48, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

I request that the page File:China-pyramid-1982-en.svg should also be deleted, not just redirected. Hddty (talk) 13:32, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

You deleted my screenshot file I was using in an article

Hi, you recently deleted this file: File:RMB for The Rejected Realms region in NationStates.png

Your reason as stated in the deletion log was: "Screenshot of non free content I think"

The publicly available message board on an online game is not 'non-free content'. If you were to take a look at the Wikipedia article for NationStates (which is where the message board and screenshot originate from), you would find all sorts of screenshots like this RMB one. There were no copyrighted logos, no copyrighted game content. User-generated content is not copyrighted as NationStates is not the publisher of said content. Your comment 'I think' clearly shows that you weren't completely confident in the validity of your action, which is strange considering your vast experience on this site. I ask that you please rectify your error as soon as possible, or I will have to put through an undeletion request. Thank you. TheEpicGhosty (talk) 12:59, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

I am not really convinced by your arguments. And the wording wasn't mine, but the nominator's. Anyway, I am willing to put the image into a regular DR, where you can present your rationales to the community. --Túrelio (talk) 13:06, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Hast du ein Flugzeug?

Nee, das wäre mir zu teuer, auch wenn so ein Vogel nicht mehr kostet als ein Mittelklassewagen. Langfristig ist es billiger, eine Pilotenlizenz zu machen als immer wieder ein Flugzeug mit Pilot zu chartern, um zu fotografieren. Ganz nebenbei kann ich ja bei den Schulungsflügen auch fotografieren und die Schulungsflüge kosten nicht viel mehr als normale Charter. --Ralf Roletschek 20:15, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

So ganz ernst war meine Frage nicht gemeint. Ich war halt nur erstaunt, dass du so eine Luftaufnahme machen konntest. --Túrelio (talk) 20:18, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Da gibts noch viel mehr Bilder... https://www.flickr.com/photos/roletschek/albums/72157714064896441 und bisher unveröffentlichte Fotos von allen Ostseebädern in Meck-Pomm, die wir im August in 4 Wochen gemacht haben. Dort mit Drohne, wir hatten eine Genehmigung für Drohnenflüge an der gesamten Küste bis 500 m Höhe. In Brandenburg fliege ich aber meist mit Flugzeug herum. Beides ist nicht gleich, man hat unterschiedliche Höhen und Blicke. Drohnen ersetzen Luftbilder aus Flugzeugen nicht, sie sind anders. --Ralf Roletschek 20:46, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Hitachi TV-crop

Hello Túrelio,

I can't understand your message you left at my discussion side. This pict is only a crop of a commons pict. From my point of view the original pict would violate the rights same way. Please explain. Thank you in advance. KR, --Wikisympathisant (talk) 06:24, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

PS: I saw at this discussion side, German is possible, I would prefer a German answer, if possible. --Wikisympathisant (talk) 06:30, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Moin Wikisympathisant,

Anlaß für mein Tätigwerden war dies Commons:Forum#Löschantrag_wegen_nicht_mehr_erfülltem_Beiwerk. Das interne Link in der Warnmeldung auf deiner Disku liefert die Begründung, warum das Bild, das praktisch nur noch den Bildschirminhalt zeigt, eine URV ist. Interessanter und für dich vielleicht überraschender ist die Frage, wie es sein kann, dass du von einem frei lizenzierten Bild einen Ausschnitt erstellst und der plötzlich eine URV sein soll, wo wir doch täglich rauf und runter betonen, dass alles auf Commons bearbeitet werden darf (weshalb ND-Material verboten ist). Nun, das Ausgangsbild wäre eigentlich bereits eine URV, weil es fremde, urheberrechtl. geschützte Inhalte zeigt (den Bildschirminhalt), an denen der Fotograf keine Rechte hat. Zulässig ist das nur aufgrund der Ausnahmeregelung "Beiwerk" (siehe COM:DM). Die greift aber nicht mehr, wenn aus dem, was zunächst nur unwesentliches Beiwerk war, den Hauptinhalt gemacht wird. --Túrelio (talk) 08:00, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Moin, danke für Deine Erklärung :-). Dann sollte man das Ursprungsbild aber konsequenterweise umbennen (z.B. JP-Shop with Hitachi, o.ä.). Alternativ könnte ich aber auch den Bildschirm verschwimmen, ausgrauen oder schwärzen, oder? VG, Wikisympathisant (talk) 08:04, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Warum umbenennen? So alte Dateien sollte man nicht umbenennen. Man könnte eher einen LA dafür stellen, zumal es eine weitere solche "Falle" enthält, das Plakat mit dem Bierglas. Ja, durch ausgrauen wäre das Problem zu beseitigen. --Túrelio (talk) 08:09, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Also, ich werd was Neues hochladen. Das Originalfile umbennen, damit klar ist, der Fernseher ist Beiwerk. Aber ganz ehrlich, warum warten wir nicht, ob sich jemand dran stört? Interessiert der unscharfe Bildinhalt wirklich? Ist das nicht etwas übertrieben? VG, Wikisympathisant (talk) 10:07, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Busto de Abel Cardoso-André Pereira 1938.jpg

This is not a copyright violation as this bust is in permanent display in pt:Sociedade Martins Sarmento, an public location and so is covered by {{FoP-Portugal}}. Please undelete. Tm (talk) 11:59, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Ok. But I will put it into a regular DR to collect opinions about FoP-scope in Portugal. I've read Commons:Freedom_of_panorama/Europe#Portugal, but that looks a bit borderline to me, as in most or all other FoP-countries, exhibits in museum etc. are not covered by that exception. --Túrelio (talk) 18:50, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Map images from Dieppe Raid page

You have had these images removed, which were legally created under Google Maps policies of Fair Use and Attribution. I would suggest checking before randomly flagging items for deletion. Please have these reinstated.Enderwigginau (talk) 20:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

https://www.google.com/permissions/geoguidelines/ Enderwigginau (talk) 21:04, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi, though you got your reply already on Commons:Village pump/Copyright, neither fair-use material nor works, which are restricted to non-commercial use, as Google-maps expressedly is, are allowed on Commons (COM:L). So, you might be a bit more careful when judging other users actions. Apart from that, I did not flag these images, as you could easily see from the warnings on your talkpage.

Back to your problem: if your Wikipedia (such as :en) has an exemption-policy for fair-use material, you could upload this image locally and claim fair-use. --Túrelio (talk) 21:37, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

File:PokoliszomszedokGameCube.jpg

Hey, thanks for deleting my PokoliszomszedokGameCube.jpg. I'm absolutely sorry and next time, I take care. --90David19 (talk) 21:36, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi, no problem. If unsure whether an image might be allowed or not, consulting Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter might help. --Túrelio (talk) 21:38, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

File:MonicaWallace.jpg

This image is in the public domain as it is on the NY State Assembly website, the US Public Domain law applies. Please stop requesting copyright information. User:johnqarlo (talk) 16:43, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Well, it may surprise you, but I've been elected to administer this site. In addition, it's the uploader's job to provide evidence for any claims of "free from copyright". --Túrelio (talk) 21:42, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Udalov

Both of photos are my own and were created by me and later used on other websites. I granted licence to wikimedia.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitic (talk • contribs)

G7

Hey Túrelio, I'm wondering why you decided to speedy delete File:Octicons11-alert-24.svg and File:Octicons11-archive-24.svg under COM:CSD#G7. They were uploaded on 17 October 2020 and deletion was requested on 28 October 2020, which is more than the maximum age of 7 days for G7. Thanks, AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 17:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi @AntiCompositeNumber, sorry for forgetting to answer your question for that long time. When deciding deletion-requests by uploader I take some liberty after judging the overall situation. In this case, the 2 icons were unused and weren't unique works by the uploader, but simply copied from a still existing website (GitHub). So, in case of need, they could easily be re-uploaded from the original source (or restored on Commons). Therefore, I decided to speedy instead of opening 2 regular DRs. --Túrelio (talk) 10:43, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Marc Mauillon © INANIS.jpg

hi I got a message from you and apparently the metadata is really wrong! The photographer who took this portrait of me is known as INANIS https://www.inanisphotographe.com. You can contact him to check that I bought the rights of this photo for promotion. I'll write to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org to let them know. Best regards M.

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Hi Túrelio, Just wanted to pop by and say thank you for deleting my images/categories, it's much appreciated, Thank you for your admin actions across the project too, Happy editing and stay safe, Kind Regards, –Davey2010Talk 20:28, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Can u help restore these two image?

File:Kai-Wei Teng pitching for the Minnesota Twins organization in 2018 (Cropped).jpg and File:Kai-Wei Teng pitching for the Minnesota Twins organization in 2018.jpg the correct Url is

https://www.flickr.com/photos/begreen90/46389011911/

Can u also come and discuss on my talk page? Thank you. Yyang Sr. GakupoKaito (talk) 21:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 21:59, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Max Klein

Dear Túrelio! Thank you very much! You are very fast and efficient! :-))) --Bizottmány (talk) 09:01, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Category:Paola_Ghanem

Category:Paola_Ghanem has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Lemondethemyscira (talk) 22:35, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Flickr

Hi. The File:Pragya.jpg that you deleted after a discussion has come back from Flickr. Is everything OK there? BTW there is a clear copvio case at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Herman Cain with wife.png. Danke. --E4024 (talk) 11:58, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Taken care of. --Túrelio (talk) 08:40, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

AP photo

Hi. You have deleted the photo by AP taken from VOA. But why this photo should not be deleted? It is also was taken by AP. --Interfase (talk) 15:49, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:39, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi Turelio, the image you have deleted was uploaded again: File:Stepanakert after Azerbaijan’s artillery attack.jpg. Interfase (talk) 14:59, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

See also this one. Reuters image Commons:Deletion requests/File:Shushi afte Azerbaijan aggression.jpg--Interfase (talk) 15:03, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Vani Bhojan press meet.png

Hello @Túrelio: , It would be great if you could spare a moment looking by at File:Vani Bhojan press meet.png and close the DR. Thanks and regards. --C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 08:26, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi, sorry, but I could close it only as Delete, because the window (Wayback-link) where the license might be shown, doesn't open, neither in Chrome, nor Edge, nor Opera. So, I can't verify the license. --Túrelio (talk) 08:39, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello once again @Túrelio: , I had check the archive link, and it is License correctly. I can provide the snapshot. Hold on, I will get back to you. Thanks. --C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 09:08, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi C1K98V, it might be better to send the screenshot to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS), so they can store it and put a ticket on the image. --Túrelio (talk) 09:21, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

On deletion

Hi, should category:user yua and category:user yua-1 be deleted as empty categories? Thanks. Prahlad (talk to me / what I've done) 16:19, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Hmm, as these are user-related categories, I wouldn't automatically apply our criteria for standard-cats here. I would recommend to first ask the creator of these cats. --Túrelio (talk) 17:16, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Yes, but he doesn't understand English. Prahlad (talk to me / what I've done) 04:28, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Max cainele erou

va salut ! mi-ati sters fisierul (fotografia) Max cainele erou pe motivul ca am copiat-o dupa pagina de facebook fotografia e facuta de mine si publicata aici tot de mine, pagina ,,Max cainele erou de pe facebook este tot de mine creata asa se explica de ce fotografia o gasiti si acolo, nu am violat nimic, drepturile de autor sunt ale mele, va rog daca se poate sa repuneti la loc imaginea multumesc frumos pentru intelegere cu stima Florica Jianu

Hi,

I have no idea about which image you are talking. None of the uploads of your account has been deleted. So, what is the exact filename? --Túrelio (talk) 20:41, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Restore Category

Hello @Túrelio: , please restore the Category:Mohammad Nazim. Thanks and kind regards. --C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 11:38, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:43, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Category:Embroidery by region

Hi, could you explain why you deleted category Embroidery by region created by me?--Sanya3 (talk) 01:23, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi, yes, it was empty at the time when I deleted it. That's a criterium for speedy deletion. If it's no longer empty, it can easily be re-created. --Túrelio (talk) 07:25, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

It wasn't empty and it's still not empty. Please restore. Thanks. --Sanya3 (talk) 03:29, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

It as surely empty when I deleted it. Restored now. --Túrelio (talk) 09:29, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! Please restore the parent category of Embroidery by location as well. Thanks. --Sanya3 (talk) 18:33, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:15, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Kino bandmembers.jpg

This regarding the (File:Kino bandmembers.jpg). This is to inform you that it is allowed to be published under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. There is another file which is also from the same website that is also published in Commons, (File:Kino sostav.jpg).

Hope you can reconsider the deletion request, as the website from which the file is taken, allows it to be published under Share Alike 4.0 International license.

--Dragoon 12345 (talk) 05:29, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi Dragoon12345,

I visited both source-sites, but could not find any mention of CC license. --Túrelio (talk) 10:16, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Copyright Deletion

thumb|The photo represents the movie poster of a hindi film. The 4.0 Release rights email has been sent to permissions wikimedia please remove the speedy deletion tag, the permission will be pasted here soon. Tempestbuda (talk) 16:55, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Ok. --Túrelio (talk) 17:00, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

The user you warned seems to have moved to a new acount

Hi Túrelio, it appears, User:Kroger4, a prolific uploader of copyrighted images, whom you warned, has now moved to a new account, User:Eyes Roger. User:BevinKacon pointed out that much and the edit history pretty well supports this with evidence. Not sure if this is a sock puppet violation and, if yes, what the procedure on Commons is to deal with such an issue. Should or does need anything to be done about this? Calistemon (talk) 01:52, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

deleted files

• File:Ponte dei pugni (The fist bridge), Venice.jpg
• File:Carmini Venice high water.jpg
• File:Farmacy under water Venice 2019.jpg
• File:Farmacy under water Venice 2019.jpg
• File:The church of San Trovaso, Venice. (Santi Gervasio e Protasio).jpg
• File:Calle Varisco. The narrowest Calle in Venice, Italy. Only 53 centimeters wide.jpg
• File:Saint Mark's Square high water 2019.jpg
• File:Basilica di San Marco under water.jpg

Hi All these files have been deleted with the reason "All rights reserved at source". I'm not very experienced and I don't remember exactly what I wrote and clicked when uploading, but the thing is: These are my own work. I hold the Copywrite. I've tried to read the Wiki Guidelines, and as I understand it, I should be able to upload my own work. As I wouldn't want to be banned, What did I do wrong here? Regards All About Venice — Preceding unsigned comment added by All About Venice (talk • contribs)

Hi, let's see:

File:Ponte dei pugni (The fist bridge), Venice.jpg sourced by you to https://unfakely.com/, which states "© 2020 Unfakely.com All Rights Reserved"[34].

File:Carmini Venice high water.jpg sourced to http://allaboutvenice.com/2019/11/20/floods-in-venice/ which states "© 2020 All About Venice - All rights reserved".

So, you either directly sourced your uploads to a copyrighted site or suggested such sourcing by writing the URL into the description.

In addition, placing the URL to your own website into the description of your uploads might be considered as spam (undesired promotion) and would likely have beend removed, if the images had remainded. --Túrelio (talk) 19:14, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Brief undeletion

Sorry to bother you. Can you please briefly undelete File:Sniper Fedir Dyachenko.jpg so I can see the caption to compare notes and edit it, check parameters, etc? (trying to find author source again, probably just a case RIA Novosti mislabeling shit as usual, long story).--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:43, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

@PlanespotterA320,  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:47, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Sorry to bother you again, but I never got to see it before it was undeleted or edit it (time zone difference), can you send me the wikitext that was on the page? Thanks.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:23, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

You have a mail. --Túrelio (talk) 19:18, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

KORAL image deleted

They deleted the image you added on KORAL page on the grounds that it had copyright. I have few pics which I think has no copyright. Could you insert them in that thread? https://ibb.co/nBYbNkr https://ibb.co/FnYvh3q https://ibb.co/3R22WR5 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.230.173.114 (talk • contribs)

Hi 88.230.173.114,

I have no idea about which image you are talking, as you posted without being logged-in. Please specify the file or discussion or your username. --Túrelio (talk) 09:58, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

undelete request

Hallo Túrelio, Thank you for always cleaning up the deletion request. I am sorry but I have a larger undeletion request because there is a mistake in the captions but I cannot find the source of the mistake anymore, I have to go through each and every image again. May I ask you to undelete these following files?

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (037).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (039).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (042).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (044).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (046).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (048).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (051).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (056).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (060).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (062).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (065).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (067).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (069).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (071).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (075).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (076).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (078).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (082).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (091).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (094).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (096).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (104).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (105).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (107).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (109).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (111).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (113).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (115).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (117).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (128).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (130).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (132).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (134).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (136).jpg

File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (138).jpg

Thank you very much for your help. Gryffindor (talk) 16:56, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

@Gryffindor, restored. --Túrelio (talk) 20:28, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. Gryffindor (talk) 22:11, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, I missed adding this one as well File:Aichi Prefectural Ceramic Museum 2018 (142).jpg, thank you. Gryffindor (talk) 22:13, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 22:19, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Please correct your mistake

• File:Autorail 554.11 du CFV3V.jpg
• File:Autorail 554.11 du CFV3V (cropped).jpg

I was allowed to use this file UNDER CC BY-SA 4.0 please correct your mistakes or ask the uploader BEFORE deleting the file. I've been using flickr pictures for a while now, I always ask owners or photographers their permission to use documents under CC-BY-SA-4.0. And if you can't read French, please ask me to translate it in English.

Document use request 10 Nov 20 à 2:39PM (PST)

Hi,

To illustrate a Wikipedia article, I would like to ask your autorization to use one of your photo https://www.flickr.com/photos/23121380@N03/21114573940/, this under Creative Commons licence https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.fr (Wikipedia standard licence) with author credit of course.

Cheers, LD

Bonjour,

Pour illustrer un article Wikipédia, j'aimerais demander votre autorisation pour utiliser une de vos photos https://www.flickr.com/photos/23121380@N03/21114573940/, cela sous licence Creative Commons https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.fr (licence de Wikipédia) avec bien entendu la mention d'auteur.

Voir pour exemple https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SAINT-GERMAIN-EN-LAYE_-_L%27ARRIV%C3%89E_DU_TRAMWAY.jpg

Amicalement, LD

<answer>

Re: Document use request

Hello, You may use the photo! Good luck with the Wiki page. Greetings, Chris

Arflhn (talk) 17:29, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi Arflhn,

• File:Autorail 554.11 du CFV3V.jpg was sourced to https://flickr.com/photos/23121380@N03/21114573940, which is (C)ARR. It didn't carry an OTRS-ticket. Apart from that, as you have re-uploaded this file again under same name, undeletion doesn't make sense.
• File:Autorail 554.11 du CFV3V (cropped).jpg the same as above. Apart from that, as you have uploaded this file again under same name, undeletion doesn't make sense.

Also, the self-made template, which you now have added to the re-uploaded files, isn't sufficient. There are 2 established ways to have images, which are offered on Flickr under a Commons-noncompliant license, accepted on Commons: 1) Flickr-user temporarily changes the license on Flickr to a Commons-compliant license (CC-BY or CC-BY-SA) and you then let the Flickr-Review-script run. Or 2) Flickr-user sends confirmation of Commons-compliant license to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 20:06, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Goodyera umbrosa

@Túrelio:
Guten Abend Túrelio, könntest Du bitte die Bilder aus oben zitierter Kategorie auf copyright prüfen?
Sie stammen offensichtlich von der Webseite gbif.org
Ich freue mich zwar immer über Orchideenbilder neuer Arten, kann aber auch hier auf Deine Kenntnisse und Dein Wissen nicht verzichten.
Dank und beste Grüße. Orchi (talk) 19:08, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi Orchi,

File:Goodyera umbrosa 41096980.jpg wurde wohl am 6.6.2019 von Justin McMahon unter CC-BY-SA oder CC-BY (beide auf derselben Seite) hier und am 28.6.2019 von Wurruma hier hochgeladen. Letzteres ist dann hier unter CC-BY-NC eingelinkt. Äh, etwas verwirrend. Da erstere Seite den älteren Dateistempel und eine kompatible Lizenz trägt, scheint es mir gerechtfertigt diese als Quelle zu verwenden. Ah, Wurruma und McMahon scheinen identisch zu sein[35]. Mit File:Goodyera umbrosa 41096987.jpg und File:Goodyera umbrosa 41096970.jpg ist es dasselbe. --Túrelio (talk) 21:39, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Guten Tag Túrelio,

herzlichen Dank für Deine sehr ausführliche Antwort. Für mich allein eine Unmöglichkeit zu einer solchen Recherche.

Grüße. Orchi (talk) 10:20, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Category request

Hello. You deleted Category:Drawings by Joseph Mallord William Turner in the Cleveland Museum of Art as an unnecessary category today. The category only had one item in it when User:Ruff tuff cream puff emptied it and nominated it for speedy deletion, but I found more images and repopulated the category. Could you please restore it? Thank you! - Eureka Lott 14:49, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Sure,  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 14:51, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Mountain ranges in Morroco

Hi,
I wrote you a message on fr:Discussion utilisateur:Túrelio.
Regards. Gemini1980 (talk) 20:12, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:30, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Hande Erçel

Hello @Túrelio: please have a look at the files in the Category:Hande Erçel and do the needful. Thanks --C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 14:44, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

• (talk page stalker) This same user had files uploaded in that cat which were for some reason deleted. I am sure s/he knows what s/he says. What I do not understand is why they do not make the necessary themselves... Regards. --E4024 (talk) 14:58, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
  • @E4024: I did mistake while uploading files for Hande Erçel. While the files were not suitable for commons, so the judgement to delete the file was alright. Thanks --C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 15:33, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 17:04, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Please Help me

I am not aware much on the laws of Wikimedia Commons. When I downloaded images, they were deleted. So I thought that taking screenshots would work. I apologize for my mistake. But I had a querry. Are images uploaded only by those who click it. Isn't there any other way for uploading images--Atlantis77177 (talk) 17:05, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

we have no laws, but rules and policies. However, as everybody else we have to respect copyright laws.

When you make a screenshot from TV, a movie or a website, you are copying the work of somebody else, which is (nearly) always copyrighted. Except of cases where the original creator released his work expressedly under a free license (COM:L), a screenshot violates copyright.

You may find images released under a free license for example on Flickr. However, not all material on Flickr is free enough. Commons accepts only images released under CC-BY, CC-BY-SA oder CC-0. See Commons:Contributing your own work and Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter for further information. --Túrelio (talk) 17:16, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Deletion Error

Hello, I am writing to request that the following file be allowed to remain: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Kelly_Breen_Headshot.jpg

I am affiliated with the photographer, the copyright holder, and the subject of the Wikipedia article (Kelly Breen). I have permission for this image to be placed on Ms. Breen's page as it is her official headshot.

Please advise for how to ensure that the photo can remain on the page.

Thank you!

Amartinez719 (talk)

Hi,

said Maria Taylor, if she is the photographer, needs to confirm the free license of this image to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . The free license is valid for everybody, not only for Wikipedia. You may use the boxed text in Commons:Email_templates#Email_message_template_for_release_of_rights_to_a_file as a template. --Túrelio (talk) 20:15, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Can You delete

Hola, usted puede borrar esto. File:2015 Caracol TV logo.svg , File:2016 Caracol televisión logo.svg y File:Caracol Televisión HD 2 logo.svg. Yo (EEIM) los subí, pero No sirven de nada. Vielen Dank . --EEIM (talk) 00:23, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion request

Please delete the four files I marked for speedy deletion; they are unused duplicates of superior files, and under thus inappropriate names. Thank you. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 02:09, 16 November 2020 (UTC).

Hi, when requesting a duplicate-deletion, you need to add the filename of the target-file, i.e. the other duplicate, which shall remain. --Túrelio (talk) 08:17, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

• Túrelio: The images are replaced by File:Touch Not—Taste Not - Frontispiece.png, File:Touch Not—Taste Not - Page 7.png, File:Touch Not—Taste Not - Page 11.png, and File:Touch Not—Taste Not - Page 17.png, respectively. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 15:23, 16 November 2020 (UTC).

File:Esat Oktay Yildiran.jpg

I uploaded a photo, but it was deleted because the link didn't work. This link works. [36] Photo at the bottom. Can you upload it?--Shakshak31 (talk) 14:56, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi Shakshak31,

the last image of Esat Oktay Yıldıran on https://internetbudur.blogspot.com/2012/04/esat-oktay-yldran-kimdir-diyarbakr.html is linked-in from https://instela-static.info/m/esat-oktay-yildiran--i271805.jpg. Neither site has any statement that this image is under a free license. --Túrelio (talk) 07:58, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Edit

Hello ,

You removed an image from my page Angus Powell - stating copy write issue ? Can I ask why you did this ? There is no infringement with this image. Its my album cover.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Anguspowell (talk • contribs)

Hi Anguspowell,

you have no deleted uploads. Please provide filename about which you are talking. --Túrelio (talk) 07:55, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

08:11, 5 November 2020‎ Filedelinkerbot talk contribs‎ 8,099 bytes -11‎ Bot: Removing Commons:File:Angus 1.jpg (en). It was deleted on Commons by Túrelio (Copyright violation: album cover artwork).— Preceding unsigned comment added by Anguspowell (talk • contribs)

Ok, finally. File:Angus 1.jpg was uploaded by JohnJones2581 (talk · contribs), not by you. It should have been deleted immediately after upload in 2018, as there was no evidence of a permission. It shows an album cover, whose artwork is usually copyrighted with the record-company or the artist. Such uploads always require a formal permission issued by the rightsholder to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. So, if you are really en:Angus Powell and if you have enough rights to release this cover-artwork under a free license, which allows anybody to use this image, even commercially, then please send from your official/business address an email confirming that you are the rightsholder and that you want to release said image under the choosen free license. --Túrelio (talk) 07:47, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Category:Works in Val-d'Oise by year

Hi, you deleted this category the 18/10 but, as you can see, the daughter category Category:Built in Val-d'Oise in 1998 was created the 17/10 : [37] Cleaning is a good thing but I can't understand your action in this case. Are you deleting too fast w/o checking first? --Birdie (talk) 22:48, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

no, I don't delete w/o checking. Of course, I am not immune to making a mistake either. [Category:Works in Val-d'Oise by year] had been tagged as empty on October 18 at 15:04. 1.5 h later, I've deleted it. So, at least 4 eyes have viewed it. It' a bit unlikely that all were wrong. Anyway, it's unclear to me why [Category:Built in Val-d'Oise in 1998] should be a daughter-cat, as the alleged mother-cat isn't shown nor visibley coded in it. --Túrelio (talk) 07:48, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi, well, Category:Built in Val-d'Oise in 1998 has been created the 17/10 à 17h26 CET and had not been changed since. So, I can't answer about what happened to the two pairs of eyes. A lag in the update of the database? The template Template:Val-d'OiseArc creates, like every Template: French departmentArc a red link about works in the department for the year in question so I created the page. Never mind, I recreated it and it's visibly not empty. --Birdie (talk) 09:44, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Wrong Violation Notice

Hi, I saw that you deleted my File:DA'HAKAN PRESS PHOTO 2019 (Cropped).jpg with the cause of copyright violation: https://wannart.com/icerik/2377-ankaradan-yukselen-kuvvetli-ses-dahakan-yigit-koc-ve-bdg but I sent the photo to Wannart actually. Hope we can fix this misunderstanding and misaction. Thanks for your help. --Palaangelino (talk) 05:06, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi, currently busy; will take care in the evening or tomorrow. --Túrelio (talk) 09:34, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Undeletion Request for a set of photos

Many photos I uploaded have been deleted because license problem. Now I have changed the license to CC0. Many thanks if you can help restore these photos.

File:James Swan briefs the UN Security Council.jpg, Flickr Link: https://www.flickr.com/photos/unsom/49580424488/in/album-72157716863872558/;

File:James Swan UN Official.jpg, Flickr Link: https://www.flickr.com/photos/unsom/50289948858/in/album-72157716863872558/;

File:Security Council meeting on the situation in Somalia.jpg, Flickr Link: https://www.flickr.com/photos/unsom/49101495167/in/album-72157716863872558/;

File:Somalia Partnership Forum.jpg, Flickr Link: https://www.flickr.com/photos/unsom/48832204096/in/album-72157716863872558/;

File:UN envoy James Swan holds virtual press conference on UN Day.jpg, Flickr Link: https://www.flickr.com/photos/unsom/50523385842/in/album-72157716863872558/;

File:UN officials James Swan and Lisa Filipetto e-meet with Cabinet Secretary for Foreign Affairs.jpg, Flickr Link: https://www.flickr.com/photos/unsom/50560556376/in/album-72157716863872558/;

File:UNGU Medal Parade Ceremony.jpg, Flickr Link: https://www.flickr.com/photos/unsom/48297773781/in/album-72157716863872558/;

As you can see, this is an official UNSOM (UN Assistance Mission in Somalia) Flickr account, which owns all the photos copyright so there's no copyright violation, and I have changed licenses to CC0. --Zoeyyy99 (talk) 12:26, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

 Done already. --Túrelio (talk) 19:31, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

WFUWO Logo

Sorry, my fault. I uploaded that file locally with fair use explanation. Have a great day! Mykola Swarnyk (talk) 17:35, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

5 photos

Dear User:Túrelio, I'm writing here to inform you that 5 of the 6 files on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Roger_Westman were uploaded by me but were not mine to upload. I understand now that this is not allowed, so i am informing you.

The 5 files that are therefore infringement of copyright are: 1. WVGE0262.jpg 2. UXAS7581.jpg 3. UOEV3937.jpg 4. FKEW5625.jpg 5. AMRV2832.jpg

Sorry for this misunderstanding. I hope that they are taken down and this will not happen again. Thank you. User talk:Aa-digital November 19, 2020

George Floyd screenshots

Hi Turelio, I recently uploaded 4 screenshots of George Floyd's arrest. The descriptions drew attention to the respiratory stress position which Floyd was held in i.e. left cheek down with right side of torso tilted up. Two were from an eyewitness phone video and two were from an arresting officers body cam. They were tagged with the screenshot license. They were erased for the reason of fair use not being allowed on Wikimedia Commons. My question is how can the screenshot on the 'The Killing of George Floyd' Wikipedia page use a screenshot on this basis but I can't upload new screenshots on this basis? Please let me know if I used the wrong license and what license I should use.

Example of deleted file: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:George_Floyd_arrest_witness_cheek_down_right_side_torso_tilted_up_1.jpg

Many thanks RickyBennison (talk) 17:55, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi RickyBennison,

fair-use material cannot uploaded to Commons for legal reasons. Such images need to be uploaded locally to the project of the intended use. So, as you likely want to use these images on :en, you need to upload it to :en and add a fair-use rationale. However, it will probably be unlikely that all 4 images are accepted. So, you should select say the 2 most important ones. --Túrelio (talk) 19:30, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Backlog

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Eric-Harris-Little-League.jpg. --E4024 (talk) 19:35, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:56, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Buzancar

Hi. Most of the files uploaded by @Buzancar: violate copyrights and as we can see in here, he/şhe upluads fair use images on Commons. Instead of creating deletion processes one by one, is it possible you just deal with them?--Nanahuatl (talk) 21:30, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

@Nanahuatl: I say for only one image "Fair use"... only one. And its deleted. There are no other fair use files I have uploaded. Most of the files I uploaded belong to me. What I have misunderstood is already tagged now. I was the send explanation I had. --Buzancar (talk) 06:15, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

@Nanahuatl: You say: "we can't upload fair use images to Commons". aren't these fair use files?: [38] --Buzancar (talk) 06:19, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi Buzancar,

the files in the category on :tr, to which you linked, are on :tr Wikipedia, i.e. they were uploaded locally. That is o.k., when the project, here :tr, has an exemption policy for such images. The "Fair-use" doctrine, at least per U.S. copyright law, allows the mere use of such images under certain conditions, but they cannot be "offered" in the way as Commons does. --Túrelio (talk) 08:56, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks @Túrelio: It does not matter. I've already used the phrase "Fair Use" for only one image. Not more. I just wondered.

It is true that I have uploaded a certain amount of photos with the sources, as I have misunderstood the copyright issue. However, I deleted some myself by tagging them with "speedy deletion". Some of them are also discussed. I would also delete them myself if necessary. but I'm waiting because they are discussed. --Buzancar (talk) 11:55, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Deleted file Fishing poster

My name is Milan Trenc, I am the author of the movie, the author of the poster and the owner of the production company that made the movie, Studio devet. How can I upload the poster without you taking it off?

Filmske informacije

Hi Milan,

in this case go to Commons:Email_templates#Email_message_template_for_release_of_rights_to_a_file, copy the the text of the highlighted or boxed permission-template, fill-out all fields, especially the filename of the image and the choosen license, then sign it (put your real name under it) and date it and send it from your official/business email address to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 20:27, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Edits

An eye on User:شمون سالی edits please. Danke. --E4024 (talk) 20:24, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

• Probably came back as User:Akramullah ali. --E4024 (talk) 01:39, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Blocked and nuked, thanks for notifying! --Achim (talk) 11:22, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Next one: User:Musqan alya. --Túrelio (talk) 09:46, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Likely copyright but unsure how to proceed

Hi Túrelio, Before I begin, please forgive me if I proceed with this incorrectly, both with my request and my posting here on your talk page. I do apologize beforehand if I have caused you any trouble. So I have stumbled upon a page with this image File:Tamron_Hall_Green_Shirt_Headshot.jpg and am positive that it is stolen from the original image essentially used on this television host's talk show's website, as can be found here (which has also, itself, been slightly edited to conform to the site). However, I've tried searching for the original picture/source and have not been able to find it specifically. Regardless, I'm quite suspicious that the user who posted this photo has simply stolen it anyways as they have not stated an original source/credited photographers for the photo and also did not give legitimate fair-use rationale for this specific photo, especially when there are already some other photos of the person with appropriate copyright. Because I'm unable to find the exact source, how would you advise me to proceed with the issues surrounding the photo that I am currently unable to resolve? Thank you for your gracious assistance and I hope you're doing well. Tunestoons (talk) 22:56, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi Tunestoons,

thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 23:44, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio,

Thank you for responding to my message and for taking action on the photo. I very much appreciate your kindness and correspondence with me. Thank you for the work you do on Wikimedia. Tunestoons (talk) 23:04, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Sorry I did a copyright violation

I'm really sorry I did a copyright violation, I was trying to do it quickly because I didn't have much time, I'm trying to change it but I can't do it, because I'm new here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Creepergamer2008 (talk • contribs)

Undeletion of File:DEATH KISS.jpg and File:IMPRINT 2008.jpg

Hello,

Please, undelete the files: File:DEATH KISS.jpg and File:IMPRINT 2008.jpg. The agreement of the real author of these works has been sent to OTRS. See: ticket:2020111910010083. Cheers, Polimerek (talk) 11:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 11:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. I was so supprised by your speedy reaction, that I though that I found these pictures in a meantime. Thanks again ;-) Polimerek (talk) 11:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Category:Random pictures by one photographer

Thank you for deleting this useless rubbish. I created the category to get the pictures out of sight. However, when I was informed the deletion had happened I received a message "The Wikimedia Commons page Category:Random pictures by one photographer has been changed on 25 November 2020 by Nanahuatl". I intended to thank this contributor, until I found in my watchlist that you actually did it. Nanahuatl was a person who was mentioned one line below your deletion in my log, because of another intervention. This made me wonder if maybe the bot / program sending such messages makes mistakes. As the systems in general work perfectly, this might be something to look into. Dosseman (talk) 08:50, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi, the message to you was in so far correct as Nanahuatl had tagged the cat for deletion. My deletion was based on his tagging. --Túrelio (talk) 09:13, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Japanese Iris シャガ (208835599).jpeg

The volunteer that mark it for deletion have serious problems with me, this is just a time to time provocation, and you boost it.

The file was imported by Commons:500px licensing data, so it is not a copyright violation. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton ^m 20:19, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

I've temp-restored the image. However, I would prefer to have the license checked by third party, as I don't really understand the process described in Commons:500px_licensing_data#How_the_tool_verify_the_license. --Túrelio (talk) 22:35, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Mailboomer 1.jpg need to be deleted

File:Mailboomer 1.jpg needs to be deleted for reasons below.

Reason for deletion: 'mistake'

Hey! Could you please delete this file for me right now?

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 13:12 26 November 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 22:48, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

File:User Francheech rowiki.jpg need to be deleted

Dear Túrelio,

This is a picture of an old vandal at en.wiki. At ro.wiki his only contribution is the creation of his own user page. How can it be solved?

Regards,--Kun Kipcsak (talk) 17:27, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

ok. I had reverted your speedy as the image is still in use (and also as it is on Commons for some years). Just open a regular deletion-request. --Túrelio (talk) 22:47, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Ok, thank you for your response!--Kun Kipcsak (talk) 12:09, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

You deleted my image, but it was allowed to use.

Philip Hedley.png VityaSchel (talk) 09:31, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi, the source-video is under the standard Youtube license, which is not allowed on Commons. It is not under a CC license. --Túrelio (talk) 09:39, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Foto Sandra Alonso Villar

Hola Túrelio, he visto el mensaje sobre el permiso de la foto de Sandra Alonso villar, te comunico que el permiso ha sido enviado a la dirección: permisions-es@wikimedia.org el día 27 de noviembre de 2020 por Sandra Alonso Villar y con copia a mi correo, si se necesitara hacer algo más te agradecería me lo indicaras, pues yo suelo publicar mis propias fotos. Gracias y Saludos Consuelo Fernandez (discusión)

Hi Consuelo, that's fine. In such cases, where you asked the rightsholder for permission, just add the following code to the image decription (at Permission= ): {{OTRS pending}} --Túrelio (talk) 17:09, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

File concern

Hello @Túrelio: I need a help please see the file File:Raissa_Barbosa_(2020).jpg. The source link mentioned in the description. I can't find the commons uploaded file on the source. Google Ris also didn't help me. Thanks for your consideration.--C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 09:49, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi C1K98V,

indeeed, the image at the alleged source is similar, but clearly not the same. Also, I didn't find any other hits on Google or TinEye. So, I've tagged it also w no-source. As it's tagged now, we can let it run its course, as there is little danger for external re-use. --Túrelio (talk) 09:54, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Importations de copyvio en nombre

Bonjour Turellio, le contributeur User talk:Tedrahcir verse depuis le mois de juin 2020 des images images dont il ne peut, de toute évidence être l’auteur. Il faudrait pour cela qu’il soit photographe professionnel et dans la profession depuis plus de quarante ans, ce qui à l’évidence n’est pas le cas… Je pense qu’il serait nécessaire d‘enquêter et de faire cesser ce trafic et de faire une suppression globale. Merci, --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 17:00, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Googletranslate : Hello Turellio, User talk:Tedrahcir has been uploading images since June 2020 which he obviously cannot author. This would require him to be a professional photographer and in the profession for over forty years, which obviously is not the case... I think it would be necessary to investigate and stop this traffic and to do a global deletion. thank you, --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 17:00, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi Ctruongngoc,

complicated looking case. I've tagged all images with evidence-based copyvio-suspicion. But for the majority there were no external hits (neither via Google-Images, TinEye nor direct name-search on Google). Shortly thereafter I received the message below. As the uploader might be the rightsholder (and become a potially valuable contributor), it seems better if a French-speaking user/admin takes over. --Túrelio (talk) 21:21, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Danke sehr für Ihre Antwort ! --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 15:32, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Un homme en fuite - Roger Jendly.jpg‬ ».

Bonjour,

Je suis le producteur du film "Un homme en fuite" de Simon EDESLTEIN réalisé en 1980. Le droits du film et les affiches m'appartiennent. Bonne soirée. Claude RICHARDET--2A01:CB14:1E9:2700:50F9:20DA:FF7B:C36D 20:52, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

as you were not logged-in, I assume you are User:Tedrahcir, right? I will then transfer this case to a French-speaking colleague. --Túrelio (talk) 21:11, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

122nd Brigade - Muntasir Billah Division.jpg

Greetings. A file I uploaded, 122nd Brigade - Muntasir Billah Division.jpg, was rightly marked for speedy deletion and deleted by you. I am requesting undeletion, on the condition that the file is designated non-free and its resolution is lowered by bots as required. If the proper course of action would be to instead reupload the file applying the said non-free use rationale, please let me know. Cheers. IvanSidorenkoSG (talk) 14:15, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi IvanSidorenkoSG,

I can temp-undelete the file, if you don't have it available. However, it cannot remain on Commons, as fair-use material is legally not allowed on Commons. Fair-use material must be uploaded locally at the project where it is used, provided the project has an exception-policy, like :en Wikipedia for example. --Túrelio (talk) 14:19, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello! Your quick and informative response is greatly appreciated! I have the file available, so no need to temp-undelete it. I am newer to Commons, so your explanation as for what to do next is very helpful.

Cheers

IvanSidorenkoSG (talk) 15:30, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

User ID :Prdp777

Photographer name is Amit Dagar from India whose mobile number is with me. He had clicked these photos. Regards Pradeep Kumar Yadav User ID :Prdp777

No copy right violation

Photographer name is Amit Dagar from India whose mobile number is with me. He had clicked all these photos with his NIKON Camera. Regards Pradeep Kumar Yadav User ID :Prdp777 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.212.167.138 (talk • contribs)

Hi Prdp777,

if said Amit Dagar is the photographer, he needs to send a valid confirmation of his authorship (and an explaination for the "Christopher Quet" in the metadata of the images) directly (no forwarding) from his official/business email address to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. You may prepare a template for him, by copying the permission-text found at Commons:Email_templates#Email_message_template_for_release_of_rights_to_a_file and adding the filename of the 3 or 4 images by him. He needs to sign and date it and add his contact data (the received email will be treated confidentially and not be published). --Túrelio (talk) 22:01, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Turelio sir

sir,Photos are totally mine. If camera belongs to Christopher Quet, then it doesn't mean that he is the author or owner of my photos.I think now it's clear about my photos ownership. Regards Pradeep Kumar Yadav User ID :Prdp777

Nothing is clear. I've told you above what to do. --Túrelio (talk) 08:13, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Museo del Chocolate de Astorga

Hola Túrelio. Quiero aclararte que la fotografía de la Sala II ha sido proporcionada, junto con las de las otras salas, por el propio Museo del Chocolate de Astorga. Saludos Consuelo Fernandez (discusión) 13:47 1 December 2020

Replied on poster's talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 09:56, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Fotografía de Consuelo Álvarez Pool, Violeta

Hola Túrelio. La fotografía de la escritora Consuelo Álvarez Pool, seudónimo Violeta, es de autor desconocido, pero si tenemos en cuenta que en España las consideradas "meras fotografías" tiene unos derechos de autor con validez de 25 años, ahora es una fotografía de dominio público. La fotografía ha sido facilitada por su familia. Saludos Consuelo Fernandez (discusión) 14:28 1 December 2020

Replied on poster's talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 09:39, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Kiev Day and Night casts.png

This image is deleted for "failed license review". Explain your reason. The Supermind (talk) 16:18, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Source claimed by you is https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LizaXtxV9ZU, which is under Standard-YT license and not allowed on Commons. See Commons:YouTube files. --Túrelio (talk) 16:24, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Category:Bridges in the Republic of Artsakh

You recently deleted this category. It was empty because its contents were emptied out of process. The motivation seems to be to remove all references to the Republic of Artsakh in Commons. Please re-create the category. Laurel Lodged (talk) 14:25, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 16:18, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Homenaje a los petas Ángel Crespo Y Pilar Gómez Bedate

Hola Túrelio, yo soy la autora la foto cuestionada, fue realizada en el exterior de la fachada lateral del Ayuntamiento del pueblo de Calaceite al anuncio del homenaje que se realizaba a los poetas Ángel Crespo y Pilar Gómez Bedate. Se trata de una fotografía tomada en la calle, nunca pensé que este acto vulnerara algún derecho. Por mi parte no me opongo a que se borre, no ha sido utilizada ni en la página de wikipedia de Angel Crespo ni en la de Pilar Gómez Bedate. Saludos Consuelo Fernandez (discusión) 2 diciembre 2020 19:53

Replied on poster's talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 09:39, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Why my paintings are to be deleted

Hi I am 245CMR, my paintings are real and I can provide screenshots if you don't believe me. Pls explain 245CMR (talk) 15:09, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

A problem

I am really sorry, I have realised my mistake. Sorry that I am in a panic. I have those statements, pls don't delete.245CMR (talk) 15:14, 3 December 2020 (UTC) @Túrelio: Pls see Ashokasundari and Jalandhara ones too.

There is no need to panic. Even if an image has been deleted, an administrator can easily un-delete it, if the reason for deletion has gone. --Túrelio (talk) 15:30, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Pls see this too 175px 245CMR (talk) 15:33, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you very much😌 245CMR (talk) 15:58, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Picture of Marsel van Oosten

I have been updating the page for Marsel van Oosten today. The pieces of text that have been indicated as copied from other websites, is because Marsel van Oosten himself has provided that text to those websites, for them to use. I know, because I'm the wife of Marsel van Oosten. This is also why I indicated the picture of Marsel that I wanted to add to the Wikipedia page as our own work. Because it is. Please contact me via the website of Marsel van Oosten to verify that I am indeed the wife of Marsel van Oosten and that no copyright infringements of any sort have been made.

By the way - I am new to Wikipedia, so I don't know how to ask for to have the removal of the page for Marsel van Oosten stopped. Is it possible for you to reverse the copyright infringement?--PhotoWizard101 (talk) 15:38, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi PhotoWizard10,

I have replied on your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 16:18, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Image of Frenchay Bridge

I am a new user to Wikipedia Commons. I have mistakenly uploaded an improved image UNDER THE WRONG USERNAME and with the WRONG TITLE. I wish to delete that before uploading an image with the correct username and correct title. I don't wish to cause any more confusion by uploading yet another image until that is resolved. Would you please permit the deletion of the image? Chris.Bristol (talk) 16:40, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 16:44, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

File:The UN envoy for Somalia, James Swan in Hargeisa, Somaliland.jpg

Hi, I have uploaded this photo to Wikipedia and am informed that this file is a copyright violation for the following reason: All rights reserved at https://somalia.un.org/index.php/en/24420-hargeisa-visit-un-envoy-highlights-importance-building-somalilands-achievements

In fact, the photo's copyright belongs to UNSOM, as the text at the bottom of the picture shows. And here's the UNSOM's official Flickr link: https://www.flickr.com/photos/unsom/48392647097/in/album-72157716863872558/ I have changed the license to CC0, please help to restore the photo, thanks. --Zoeyyy99 (talk) 16:57, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 10:08, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

please delete my picture

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:박윤찬.jpg

user id : 박윤찬 that's my mistake. would you delete my picture? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 박윤찬 (talk • contribs)

 Done finally. --Túrelio (talk) 22:02, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Anton Docher pictures

@Túrelio:

Hi Turelio, you intend to delete the Anton Docher's related photos. Before to do so, here’s what I know about these pictures. I found them in an old family album in my grandparents' attic. They were sent to his brother (my grandfather’s grandfather) by Padre Docher himself, who was then a missionary in America. My family being affiliated with the padre. They date for the most part from the 19th century or early twentieth (except that of the burial which is of 1928) and are the work of one or more unknown authors (no signature present on both sides). So I scanned the original prints, found in the album, to donate them to Wikimedia Commons thinking that they had historical (even modest) importance. I don’t know how to assign them a rights license or anything, I did my best to improve the license, but I don’t know if that’s enough. Please tell me what is correct to apply them as a copyright in this case. Thank you for your help.--Bougnat87 (talk) 05:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Tolon Çamaşır Makinesi Patenti.png

Hello. Could you evaluate the deleting request? Turkish official documents are public domain. I changed the copyright info and author. Thanks a lot!--Kadıköylü (talk) 08:42, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

did you scan/capture the original document by yourself or did you obtain the image from somewhere else? As it is so blurry, I can't read the mentioned date. Do you know when this document was issued? --Túrelio (talk) 08:54, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi@Túrelio: . The date is 1966. I am Kamil Tolon's grandson. I scanned it.--Kadıköylü (talk) 09:00, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Ok. If it is kept, you should consider making a better scan or taking a shot by mobile phone. --Túrelio (talk) 09:02, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. I would upload it with a better quality.--Kadıköylü (talk) 09:05, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

I changed the copyright info again.@Túrelio: Also, I uploaded the image with better quality. Thank you for your helps.--Kadıköylü (talk) 09:20, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Henri Sert 1964.jpg

File:Henri Sert 1964.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: COM:CSD#G2, broken redirect If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

  — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 09:22, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

You keep removing categories anarchism

So certain removal seems justified while others don't make any sense like the image "Praxis Germany" literally has an anarchist circle A on it. So it clearly fits the category anarchism.

As an example this image doesn't justify being listed under anarchism?

The image has anarchist flags and anarchist banners

This image as an example has an anarchist flag on the side so why did you unlist it under "anarchism?"

Vallee01 (talk) 09:05, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Try reading Commons:Categories#Over-categorization. Cat:anarchism in xycountry is always a sub-cat of Cat:anarchism.--Túrelio (talk) 09:10, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Got it, everything uploaded almost all has anarchist symbols attached, however I think certain images are fine to have an overall category of "anarchism" where it doesn't fit certain sub categories. I get it though. Vallee01 (talk) 09:26, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

You need to put a bit more research into File:Kropotkin.jpg. The license on Flickr is not compatible with Commons and being PD in the US alone is not enough, as the country of origin in Russia. While I assume it to be in the PD also in rUssia, that needs a bit of evidence. [39] credits it to TASS archive.Túrelio (talk) 09:33, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

I think I found the actual image somewhere else, that version is just scaled down. The Flickr user doesn't have actual rights to the image, it's just where I found the image. Vallee01 (talk) 22:22, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Found it Kropotkin.jpg is just a scaled down version of File:Pavel Miliukov&Peter Kropotkin.jpg, which is properly licensed. Kropotkin died in 1921 which is over 99 years ago, the image when it was taken is from 1917 over 103 years ago. Also the image was shot in the US, it is impossible for the image to not be in public domain. Because it is just a scaled down version of File:Pavel Miliukov&Peter Kropotkin.jpg I think Kropotkin.jpg should be deleted or maybe I can create different framing. Vallee01 (talk) 22:28, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Why do you think that the image was shot in the U.S.? The description states "Pavel Nikolaevich Milyukov and Pyotr Alekseevich Kropotkin - participants in the State Conference. Moscow". And, well, "is properly licensed", not really. It claims "author unknown" and at the same time uses a license based on year of death of author. --Túrelio (talk) 07:31, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Sujet : droit photo + bonne insertion page Wiki « Sébastien de Montessus »

Bonjour,

La photo que j’ai prise est celle qu’a fait circuler l’intéressé partout à l’extérieur, elle est publique.

Par ailleurs, je ne suis pas arrivé à l’insérer comme il faudrai sur la page.

Je suis débutant.

Merci pour votre aide — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garcimore7 (talk • contribs)

Hi,

sorry, don't know enough French. So, if I understand you correctly, you made and uploaded a reproduction of an existing photography, that was published previously, right? In general, that is not allowed. Being published, especially in the web, has little to no relevance for the original copyright. The only known exception is Commons:Freedom of panorama, which does apply only to works (of art) which are permanently installed in public space. This exception, however, depends on country-laws. It does not exist in France. Some general information about what can or cannot be photographed for Commons: Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter. --Túrelio (talk) 14:04, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Photo replacement

Good afternoon. Please help me please replace the Main photo on my page. New photos have been uploaded to the Wiki warehouse with an open license. I don't know how to replace the photos. Please help me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Petr Elfimov 1980 (talk • contribs)

User talk:Wname1

Sorry, I forgot to delete it first. Wname1 (talk) 11:35, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Logo Garoa CC-BY-SA

Ni! Olá, Túrelio, bom dia. Você recentemente eliminou o logotipo do Garoa daqui. Segundo o site do clube, todos os logos são publicados sob licença CC-BY-SA (fonte: [40]). Peço assim que restaure a imagem. Obrigado, Solstag (talk) 14:31, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi Solstag,

this may be a misunderstanding. The linked page states "Os desenhos então registrados sob a licença Creative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)." But, Commons does not allow the NC restriction; see COM:L. --Túrelio (talk) 15:20, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

DR

Hi. Can you have a look at this DR and correct it if I have made a mistake, before receiving unnecessary criticism from followers? Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 19:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

• Sorry to disturb you again. This discussion was opened supposedly to delete an empty cat. (You know I always mark them for speedy deletion.) Then one file -and with OTRS permission- was added but then someone said "why do we need a cat for one file?" OK. Then two other files were added. So we have a cat with three files. Those people who opened the discussion or opposed keeping it because there was only one file now just ignore the discussion and do not come back to say "OK, now the cat is populated so it can be closed". This is why I disturb you. There is nothing left to discuss at that cat. Please close the CfD. Thanks a lot. --E4024 (talk) 22:35, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
• Thank you very much for your kind help, as always. I would also like to take your time to kindly close also Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/12/Category:Can Sarvan. As opposed to the above case, the files in this cat have been proposed for deletion. If the files are deleted, I will mark the empty cat with "SDC2" for its speedy deletion. There is nothing in that cat to discuss about. Thank you very much in advance. --E4024 (talk) 14:12, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
  • It's closed already, thanks. Merry Xmas. E4024 (talk) 21:52, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Priya Bhavani Shankar.jpg

The file can be deleted. Sorry, even after it's licensed under CC0, if Wikipedia doesn't accept, I am happy to oblige. Not sure what's the next step. Please advice.

Praveentech (talk) 11:08, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi, where is the evidence that it is "licensed under CC0"? --Túrelio (talk) 11:50, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

I am sorry, I saw it on the same page I linked when I uploaded the file. I guess either I should have looked at somewhere else or I might have mistaken. It seems like a genuine mistake from my side. Does this harm my good standing in the site? Praveentech (talk) 02:09, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

No; everybody makes errors of judgement. However, one should try to earn from one's own mistakes over time. --07:24, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Be-bop 1949 97X146.jpg

Moin Túrelio,

kannst Du die Datei bitte wiederherstellen? Wir haben eine gültige Freigabeerklärung im OTRS. --Mussklprozz (talk) 16:37, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Danke und Gruß, --Mussklprozz (talk) 16:37, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Danke fürs Wiederherstellen. Permission und Quelle habe ich eingetragen. --Mussklprozz (talk) 09:04, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Please undelete Category:VH-FKG (Fokker F28)

The editor who emptied it did not do any checks or research on the photographs and was wrong with their speedy deletion request. Bidgee (talk) 23:23, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Copyrighted photos uploaded

Hello. User " Baratiiman " uploading copyrighted photos. Some of them nominated for deletion but still using them on other wikis. Thanks Fowi964 (talk) 08:14, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Problematic user

Hello Túrelio! Please review the uploads of this user. All of them are either copyright violations or hoaxes/personal collection imagery; none of the uploads suits Common's policies and all of them should be deleted. Regards, IceWelder [✉] 13:00, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Cancelling deletion request

Hi, I was wondering if you would be able to cancel this deletion request. I created it by mistake as the file qualified for speedy deletion and had already been removed and I don’t really know how to undo the request and delete the nomination page. Best wishes. 2.30.249.73 16:41, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:24, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

File:ThomasDewey.jpg

Is it usual to delete the older version of an image when someone uploads a new/duplicate? Primefac (talk) 13:00, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

That depends on the circumstances. In this case the older one had 674 × 866 pix, whereas the later one has ‎2.846 × 3.550. That was my rationale. --Túrelio (talk) 13:24, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Fair enough. Primefac (talk) 13:26, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2020/2021!

		* Happy Holidays 2020/2021, Túrelio! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:39, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Battle of kranti

Hello @Túrelio: , Merry Christmas, Enjoy the Christmas Eve. Please have a look at these user upload File:Dimple Hayathi.jpg, Google ris, tineye didn't show any hits. The rest uploads were tagged by me and was taken careof by you. Thanks for your consideration. --C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 08:39, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

	Merry Christmas Túrelio
	Hi Túrelio, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very happy and healthy New Year, Thanks for all your contributions to the 'pedia this past year,    –Davey2010talk 18:47, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Weihnachtsgrüße

Hallo Túrelio.
Ich wünsche Dir ein gesegnetes und frohes Weihnachtsfest.
Hoffen wir, dass das neue Jahr 2021 wieder mehr Normalität und vor allen Dingen Gesundheit für uns alle bereit hält.
Vielen Dank für die umfangreiche Hilfe, die Du mir auch in diesem Jahr wieder hast zukommen lassen. Danke!
Alles Gute für Dich und beste Grüße. Orchi (talk) 19:45, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Hello Turélio, Merry Christmas. --Havang(nl) (talk) 08:47, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Du erhältst einen Orden!

	Der Fleißorden
	I was already very grateful to you for conscientiously handling my deletion and renaming requests. When I realized today that you had also fixed the misconduct of User:Jilligate, I felt an even greater need to award you this medal (if I am entitled to do so)! Rossel44 (talk) 21:43, 29 December 2020 (UTC)