User talk:Mike1979 Russia/Archive 2

Iranian vessels

Hi Mike, your naval drawings are incredible. Can you create silhouettes and drawings for Iranian submarines and surface combatants? Pahlevun (talk) 11:30, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

No, I have not collected information about them. Mike1979 Russia (talk) 17:15, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Alright. Thanks anyway and keep up the good work. Pahlevun (talk) 15:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suffren class SSN.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 17:07, 4 March 2021 (UTC)  Support Very nice to see an svg image in here. Good work. --Nefronus 08:14, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Mullti-purpose dry cargo ships

Hello Mike, please inform the DNV GL (for example DNV GL G112337), that the company use the wrong type designation. Otherwise you should revert all your recently changes. Greeting --Ein Dahmer (talk) 14:15, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello. Does "Multi-purpose dry cargo ship" use any other companies? For example, ABS? If not, it's only local type. And my changes will remain. Greeting --Mike1979 Russia (talk) 14:36, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SSN774.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astute class SSN.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Your drawings are really awesome! Great quality! --Mosbatho 21:07, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Great Work - one question

Dear Mike1979, your drawings of submarines are well known to all and I admire your consistent uploading of such high quality images. Perhaps you will find time to create an image about the Chinese DF-41 ballistic missile system to use in the various Wikipedia articles. What do you think? Best regards, Mosbatho (talk) 15:27, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

I try to do it. -Mike1979 Russia (talk) 11:30, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Type 212 submarine.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mosbatho 19:59, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soryu class submarine.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Should the resolution not be a bit bigger? I think that will be not problem. --Ermell 16:13, 23 March 2021 (UTC) It is vector file you can choose any resolution as you like. --Mike1979 Russia 08:14, 24 March 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Thanks for the answer. I thaugt so. --Ermell 10:39, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konstantin Simonov in winter 2021-02-07 pic4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 21:44, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow North River Terminal in winter 2021-02-07 pic4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective correction (verticals) necessary. --Tuxyso 19:00, 31 March 2021 (UTC) New version. Did you mean such changes?--Mike1979 Russia 09:21, 1 April 2021 (UTC) >Exactly that. More foreground had been better, but now QI for me. --Tuxyso 07:08, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dolphin class submarine.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 15:42, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dolphin II AIP class submarine.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 15:42, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dongfeng-41 CSS-20 sketch.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose Below 2 MP. --Steindy 23:57, 28 May 2021 (UTC) It is vector file. You cn choose any resolution as you like. I think your opposition is not correct in this case. --Mike1979 Russia 13:39, 29 May 2021 (UTC)  Support No, this is a svg-file which means that it could be way over the 2 MP limit. This image is of very high quality. --Mosbatho 21:38, 1 June 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 16:46, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Почему?

Коллега, объясните вашу правку [1] P.Fisxo (talk) 17:05, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

На складе существует консенсус, что категория строителя находится в категории ИМО. И ваша правка приводит к оверкатегоризации.Mike1979 Russia (talk) 17:41, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

гм... не понимаю. что такое IMO знает полторы калеки (я, к примеру не знал и даже не предполагал, что такое возможно) и делать категорию производителя через совершенно узкопрофильный признак, о существовании которого простые люди не знают - это как минимум странно. P.Fisxo (talk) 08:49, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Рад, что вы разобрались. Логика в этом все же есть. IMO номер - уникальный и присваивается судну на все время его существования. Наименование же может меняться. Если производителя ставить в категории по именам, то категорий производителей будут загромождены судами, которым меняли имена. А так там будет только одна подкатегория. Mike1979 Russia (talk) 10:34, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lunnaya Sonata on the Khimki Reservoir 2021-06-24 8806.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:00, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Knyazhna Anastasiya on the Khimki Reservoir 2021-06-18 8676.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:00, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shlyuzovoy-125 with 7663 barge on the Khimki Reservoir 2021-06-18 8696.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Internal schematics of submarines

Regarding my question at File_talk:Typhoon_class_Schema.svg, I was wondering if you could clarify what sources of information you use to produce the internal diagrams of submarines. (I was hoping we could cite a source on the English Wikipedia for the Typhoon schematic.) TheFeds 07:40, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Add sources. Mike1979 Russia (talk) 08:19, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply, but I'm not sure I understand you. Were you suggesting that I add a citation to a source that matches the diagram you produced? I wouldn't know where to start, because I don't know where you found the information in the first place. If I knew that information, I would add it to the description and cite it on the Wikipedia page that uses the image. TheFeds 15:43, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

I added sources on file description page. You can start from ISBN 5-8172-0069-4 (but it's on russian). Mike1979 Russia (talk) 16:36, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. It is not a problem that you read Russian-language sources and adapted them when creating your SVG image. (I suspect some editors on English Wikipedia might wonder if partially referring to forum posts is reliable enough, but that would be a question for another day, and I suspect that the book source you listed will satisfy their concerns.) TheFeds 07:15, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shadowgraph S-1 IX series submarine.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 21:22, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shadowgraph Kalev class submarine.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:32, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rossiya on the Khimki Reservoir 2021-06-18 8650.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:47, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! K.A. Timiryazev on the Khimki Reservoir 2021-06-26 9025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:01, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aleksandr Svirskiy on the Khimki Reservoir 2021-06-12 8427.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 06:20, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Knyazhna Anastasiya on the Khimki Reservoir 2021-06-18 8681.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bottom crop (porthole windows) needs fixing IMO. --Y.ssk 07:48, 23 September 2021 (UTC) Fixed bottom windows. Mike1979 Russia 10:21, 23 September 2021 (UTC)  Support Looks fine now. Good quality. --Y.ssk 18:46, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lev Tolstoy on the Khimki Reservoir 2021-06-18 8569.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Peulle 07:43, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aleksandr Svirskiy on the Khimki Reservoir 2021-06-12 8436.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hillopo2018 08:56, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zamoskvoretskaya ATS Building Ordynka Bol Str 25 str 1 2016-04-19 2635.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:44, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tretyakov Gallery Main Building Lavrushinskiy Lane 10 str 4 2016-04-19 2690.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:44, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Christ the Saviour 2016-04-12 2363.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:44, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konkord on the Moskva River 2021-05-22 8386.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could be sharper. --Steindy 10:06, 26 September 2021 (UTC) Difficult light too and slight ccw tilt --Poco a poco 10:39, 26 September 2021 (UTC) What do you mean "Difficult light"? Mike1979 Russia 16:08, 26 September 2021 (UTC) Sharpened and fixed tilt. Mike1979 Russia 06:38, 27 September 2021 (UTC)  Support QI to me, the resolution is high --Poco a poco 13:13, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roza on the Moskva River 2021-05-22 8343.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could be sharper. --Steindy 10:06, 26 September 2021 (UTC) Sharpened. Mike1979 Russia 06:38, 27 September 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rodnaya Rus on the Khimki Reservoir 2021-06-26 9067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The masts are leaning to the right, please apply perspective correction. Otherwise good quality for me. --Domob 16:41, 1 October 2021 (UTC) Fixed tilt. Mike1979 Russia 06:12, 3 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Thanks, good quality. --Domob 07:55, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RENFE 253 -Sagunt - 2014-07-29 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:48, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trade Rows with Bell Tower Suzdal 2016-06-20 5630.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:23, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Towers and Walls Spaso-Yevfimiyev Monastery Suzdal 2016-06-20 5574.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:23, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Epiphany Church Suzdal 2016-06-21 5920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:23, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pharmacy Garden Spaso-Yevfimiyev Monastery Suzdal 2016-06-22 6045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:23, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prison Spaso-Evfimiev Monastery Suzdal 2016-06-22 6002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --CuriousGolden 18:00, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas Church,Suzdal 2016-06-22 6159.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs some additional sharpening --Poco a poco 08:52, 4 October 2021 (UTC) Sharpened. Rewiew other my fotos, please. Mike1979 Russia 05:06, 5 October 2021 (UTC) I'd had promoted it now, but I see I'm not welcomed as I don't promote your images right away. Only reviewers that do so are then welcome? Are you here to gather awards or to improve your skills? --Poco a poco 21:05, 6 October 2021 (UTC) No, No! You are welcome. I'm glad when I receive a review with directions for further photo improvement. First of all, I want to improve my photo skills. I'll be pleasere if you will review my photos further. Mike1979 Russia 15:15, 7 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Ok, thanks for your feedback, I got it wrong, sorry. QI to me now. --Poco a poco 11:29, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dormition of the Theotokos Cathedral Vladimir 2016-06-23 6402.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I will support. Perfect lighting and color rendering, perfect composition. Good quality. There are, however, minor color artifacts at the spire of the bell tower on the right edge. But it doesn't affect my opinion. --Andrey Korzun 10:12, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Demetrius Church Vladimir 2016-06-23 6305.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:06, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Demetrius Church Vladimir 2016-06-23 6280.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --CuriousGolden 09:03, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Demetrius Church Vladimir 2016-06-23 6304.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --CuriousGolden 09:03, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Transfiguration Cathedral with Belfry Spaso-Evfimiev Monastery Suzdal 2016-06-22 6031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I will support. Good quality. --Andrey Korzun 10:28, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dmitry Pozharsky Tomb Spaso-Evfimiev Monastery Suzdal 2016-06-22 5994.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I will support. Good quality. --Andrey Korzun 10:28, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pokrovsky Monastery Suzdal 2016-06-23 6231.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:04, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annunciation Gate Church Pokrovsky Monastery Suzdal 2016-06-23 6223.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:04, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nativity of the Theotokos Cathedral Suzdal 2016-06-22 6148.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:07, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dormition of the Theotokos Cathedral Vladimir 2016-06-23 6389.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is some cw tilt here --Poco a poco 11:05, 9 October 2021 (UTC) Fixed tilt. --Mike1979 Russia 05:43, 10 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:14, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lenin Monument and Bell Tower of Rizopolozhensky Monastery 2016-06-22 Suzdal 6178.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The disturbing branches on the right edge of the image should be removed. --F. Riedelio 07:12, 10 October 2021 (UTC) Fixed branches. --Mike1979 Russia 13:08, 10 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 06:28, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Great Work - another question

Dear Mike1979, me again. Your last drawing of the DF-41 is a great contribution for Wikimedia and again, glad to have it on Commons under a free license. Perhaps you will find time to create an image of the Chinese DF-17 ballistic missile system with its hypersonic glider in order to have it for various Wikipedia articles. What do you think? Best regards, Mosbatho (talk) 20:17, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

I'll try to draw it. Mike1979 Russia (talk) 04:53, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Большое спасибо за ваш положительный отзыв! --Mosbatho (talk) 21:09, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Done. Mike1979 Russia (talk) 08:10, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Super! Your file is already used intensively. --Mosbatho (talk) 20:29, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Ehm, there seem to have been went something wrong with the QI nom. --Mosbatho (talk) 21:07, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OT-130 in Museum of technique 2016-08-16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:47, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! T-60 in Museum of technique 2016-08-16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:50, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A. S. Pushkin on the Khimki Reservoir 2021-06-25 8965.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:45, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A. S. Pushkin on the Khimki Reservoir 2021-06-25 8956.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:09, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lebedinoye Ozero on the Khimki Reservoir 2021-07-05 9470.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:09, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lebedinoye Ozero on the Khimki Reservoir 2021-07-05 9489.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:09, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! T-72 in Museum of technique 2016-08-16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:30, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Severanya Skazka on the Khimki Reservoir 2021-08-31 0074.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you sharpen the ship? --Steindy 10:45, 3 January 2022 (UTC) New version. Sharpened. --Mike1979 Russia 11:23, 3 January 2022 (UTC)  Support OK. --A.Savin 21:35, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

"Wooden outhouse for servants"

Здравствуйте, а на каком основании вы решили, что это здание служило в качестве туалета? --A.Savin 10:51, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Wooden outhouse for servants = Деревянный флигель для прислуги, согласно переводчику. Причем здесь туалет? Mike1979 Russia (talk) 10:56, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

При том что outhouse это "туалет типа сортир", см. Category:Outhouses, en:Outhouse. --A.Savin 11:05, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Согласно словарю "outhouse=сортир" только в американском варианте английского, но это попало в вики. Для устранения разночтений переименовал на "outbuilding". Если у вас есть вариант перевода лучше, смело переименовывайте. Mike1979 Russia (talk) 11:18, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizhniy Novgorod on the Khimki Reservoir 2021-07-05 9565.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 21:22, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! M114 155 mm Howitzer in Museum of technique 2016-08-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ML-20 152 mm gun-howitzer in Museum of technique 2016-08-16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:24, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yakovlev Yak-38 (s-n 1010) in Museum of technique 2016-08-16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:20, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! T-34-76 model 1943 in Museum of technique 2016-08-16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs a description. --Ermell 09:05, 15 January 2022 (UTC) Added --Mike1979 Russia 09:41, 15 January 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:59, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21SMT in Museum of technique 2016-08-16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please add a description --Ermell 09:05, 15 January 2022 (UTC) Added --Mike1979 Russia 09:41, 15 January 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:59, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! M3A1 Stuart in Museum of technique 2016-08-16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please add a description --Ermell 09:05, 15 January 2022 (UTC) Added --Mike1979 Russia 09:41, 15 January 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:59, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-19SV in Museum of technique 2016-08-16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please add a description --Ermell 09:05, 15 January 2022 (UTC) Added --Mike1979 Russia 09:41, 15 January 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:59, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! T-62 in Museum of technique 2016-08-16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA in the trees should be removed. --Ermell 20:32, 7 January 2022 (UTC) New version uploaded. --Mike1979 Russia 09:19, 9 January 2022 (UTC) Still some left. Sorry. --Ermell 22:11, 10 January 2022 (UTC) Could you show me where? (with Image-Annotator) --Mike1979 Russia 13:52, 11 January 2022 (UTC) Done. Only a few. --Ermell 16:09, 12 January 2022 (UTC) Another attempt --Mike1979 Russia 07:43, 15 January 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:02, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bratstevo Estate Wooden House 2016-04-30 2958.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I miss a category about the subject, not just the place --Poco a poco 09:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC) Created subcategory. --Mike1979 Russia 09:46, 16 January 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! EP2D in Serpukhov 2021-10-22 0466.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please remove the CA. --Ermell 08:47, 22 January 2022 (UTC) CA deleted --Mike1979 Russia 12:05, 22 January 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:46, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Trinity Church Vladimir 2016-06-23 6328.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:39, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House from Vasenino Suzdal Museum of Wooden Architecture 2016-06-21 5787.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 10:54, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Posad House Suzdal Lenina Str 148 2016-06-20 5606.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:39, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elijah the Prophet Church Suzdal 2016-06-21 5694.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could do with some more sharpness. --Ermell 08:50, 22 January 2022 (UTC) Sharpened --Mike1979 Russia 12:05, 22 January 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:46, 22 January 2022 (UTC)  Comment With your Suzdal series, I really like how you show the churches within the landscape and how you still make them stand out. That's a nice balance. --Martinus KE 15:20, 24 January 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:42, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Severanya Skazka on the Khimki Reservoir 2021-08-31 0085.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas Church Vladimir 2016-06-23 6353.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:36, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golden Gate Vladimir 2016-06-23 6326.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The spots in the sky should be removed IMO. --Ermell 10:37, 30 January 2022 (UTC) Spots deleted --Mike1979 Russia 16:46, 30 January 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A. S. Pushkin on the Khimki Reservoir 2021-06-25 8970.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC) To adequately categorize this ship in Commons, you should create an IMO parent category “IMO 8793251” and then include Category:Gleb Krzhizhanovskiy (ship, 1990) and Category:A. S. Pushkin (ship, 1990) as sub-categories underneath it. Contact me if you need further details. --GRDN711 05:39, 1 February 2022 (UTC) Done. --Mike1979 Russia 17:04, 2 February 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --GRDN711 22:08, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dongfeng-17 sketch.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Category for type of subject and English description necessary. --Ermell 09:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC) Done. --Mike1979 Russia 09:29, 7 February 2022 (UTC)  Support Very accurate drawing. Descr. and cat is now existing. --Mosbatho 19:08, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shadowgraph S british class groupe I submarine.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 12:23, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shadowgraph S british class groupe II submarine.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 12:23, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shadowgraph S british class groupe III submarine.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 12:23, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shadowgraph S british class groupe III mod submarine.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. English description would be very useful. --Ermell 09:08, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shadowgraph Ronis class submarine.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:49, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MiG-23UB near RSK MiG 2022-02-22 1326.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:23, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MiG-23UB near RSK MiG 2022-02-22 1334.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:51, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MiG-23UB near RSK MiG 2022-02-22 1327.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA should be removed. --Ermell 20:25, 9 June 2022 (UTC) I try to delete CA. If you see CA elsewhere tell me where it is. --Mike1979 Russia 10:07, 11 June 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:49, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shadowgraph U british class groupe III submarine.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:45, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shadowgraph V british class submarine.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:45, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shadowgraph U british class groupe I mod submarine.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, although I wonder if it is a good time to present here Russian weaponery with an imperialist invasion ongoing right now --Poco a poco 08:57, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delta Stretch class SSN.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments As said, unappropriated IMHO to show now the Russian weaponry portfolio at this time --Poco a poco 07:38, 28 June 2022 (UTC) IMHO Your position is incorrect. Should I decline your fotos if they don't show the imperialist invasion? --Mike1979 Russia 07:58, 28 June 2022 (UTC)  Support All 3 of these nominations are of very good, useful images. -- Ikan Kekek 09:10, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delta IV Stretch class SSN.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments As said, unappropriated IMHO to show now the Russian weaponry portfolio at this time --Poco a poco 07:38, 28 June 2022 (UTC) IMHO Your position is incorrect. Should I decline your fotos if they don't show the imperialist invasion? --Mike1979 Russia 07:58, 28 June 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:10, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shadowgraph U british class groupe I submarine.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Really good. All of these silhouettes are quite useful. I'd encourage you to nominate them at COM:VIC. -- Ikan Kekek 22:45, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shadowgraph U british class groupe II submarine.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 22:45, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yankee-Stretch class SSN.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kolomenskiy-805 on the Khimki Reservoir 2021-07-07 9597.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:28, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shlyuzovoy-60 with barge on the Khimki Reservoir 2021-07-07 9601.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:56, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moskva-1 on the Khimki Reservoir 2021-07-07 9566.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments WB should be warmer IMO --Ermell 07:29, 9 July 2022 (UTC) I changed t from 5850 to 6200. Is it OK now? --Mike1979 Russia 08:04, 11 July 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. You should also add an English description --Ermell 06:54, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt-Peterburg on the Khimki Reservoir 2021-07-07 9572.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:06, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borey-A class SSBN.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Graney class SSN.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Graney class SSN 885M variant.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Protection of the Theotokos 2022-03-20 1450.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 10:19, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Protection of the Theotokos 2022-03-20 1452.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 10:19, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Requesting a sketch

Dear Mike,
Since your constant excellent drawings push us all on top, I am asking you again if you are motivated in drawing another land vehicle drawing. A sketch of this vehicle ЗСУ-37-2 «Енисей» would be needed so that we have an image of that AA tank for all Wikimedia projects. What do you think? Best regards, Mosbatho (talk) 14:24, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

OK. I will draw. But now Soviet/Russian military equipment is not welcome here. Mike1979 Russia (talk) 06:03, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your positive response. No, no, free material is always very welcome on Commons. I uploaded a photo of a soviet radar vehicle the week before last, which received two awards. There was not a single negative comment by anyone at all. Mosbatho (talk) 20:19, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Done. Mike1979 Russia (talk) 09:47, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Thank you very much for this useful drawing of high quality! Kindest regards, Mosbatho (talk) 20:03, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sergy Radonezhsky church in Tushino 2022-03-20 1442.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:13, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vasiliya Petushkova Street 27 2022-03-20 1445 копия.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA should be removed and an English description would be helpful --Ermell 21:01, 29 July 2022 (UTC) Fixed. --Mike1979 Russia 10:56, 30 July 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:11, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gateway 8 of Moscow-Volga Canal 2022-03-20 1425.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I like the composition. Asmodea Oaktree 08:54, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sergy Radonezhsky church in Tushino 2022-03-20 1443.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please improve the categorization. --XRay 17:32, 6 August 2022 (UTC) Improved. --Mike1979 Russia 11:13, 7 August 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Thank you. --XRay 13:15, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gateway 8 of Moscow-Volga Canal 2022-03-20 1424.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO the sharpness should be better. And: Sharpness and DoF is better at something like f/8 or f/11 instead of f/4. --XRay 17:34, 6 August 2022 (UTC) Sharpened. This foto was taken from moving train on the bridge over channel that's why I couldn't use f/8 or f/11. I prefered shorter exposion to avoid blur. --Mike1979 Russia 11:30, 7 August 2022 (UTC)  Support Acceptable. I added a category for the moving train. --XRay 13:16, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Category:Ships_built_at_Portsmouth_Naval_Dockyard

Ships built at Portsmouth Naval Dockyard has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Motacilla (talk) 11:22, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kronshtadt on the Khimki Reservoir 2022-06-08 1501.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:12, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kronshtadt on the Khimki Reservoir 2022-06-08 1515.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:14, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Consensual review rules

Dear Mike1979 Russia/Archive 2, you set some quality image candidates to "Discuss" without a prior vote. This should not be done. Please have a look at Commons:Quality_images_candidates#How_to_ask_for_consensual_review, last paragraph: "Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you cannot make a decision, add your comments but leave the candidate on this page." Best regards --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 20:37, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fryanovo Estate 2021-11-10 0609.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:05, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RA-73304 Boeing 737-800 Pobeda VKO 2022-08-03 2037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments English description would be very helpful. --Ermell 08:27, 9 September 2022 (UTC) Fixed all --Mike1979 Russia 08:40, 9 September 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:23, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RA-73068 Boeing 737-400 UTair VKO 2022-08-03 2027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:09, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RA-89147 Sukhoi Superjet 100 Rossiya LED 2022-08-03 2045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I believe that there is some cw tilt --Poco a poco 09:12, 9 September 2022 (UTC) Yes, it was. Fixed --Mike1979 Russia 11:23, 9 September 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:54, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Добрый день! Если нужно, если вы этого хотите, я могу помогать с балансом белого. Не обещаю, что с каждой фотографией, конечно, но в спорных и сложных случаях постараюсь помочь. Напишите мне, если нужно. --LexKurochkin (talk) 19:27, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Цветоаномалия

Большое спасибо. Mike1979 Russia (talk) 13:36, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Пишите на мою стену, где помочь - я очень постараюсь сделать, если только работа совсем не заест, что временами бывает. LexKurochkin (talk) 14:51, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Если не затруднит, напишите по текущим 3 фото на QI: сделать их холоднее-теплее и зеленее-фиолетовее или прям на фото (Добавить примечание) пометить зону, которая должна быть нейтральной. Такой помощи мне будет более чем достаточно. Заранее благодарю. Mike1979 Russia (talk) 12:51, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Попробуем. Пока сделал одну, которая обсуждается как спорная, завтра постараюсь сделать остальные. LexKurochkin (talk) 22:20, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Сделал и вторую, хотя там и так было довольно близко, но все же чуть зеленовато. Третья, как мне кажется, коррекции не требует. LexKurochkin (talk) 22:25, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

@Mike1979 Russia Я использую Photoscape X. Не уверен, будет ли результат тем же, если использовать другое ПО. LexKurochkin (talk) 07:38, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Я - Camera RAW, так что думаю проблем не будет. Поправил самую спорную по вашей зоне - получилось ее надо было сделать еще холоднее. Спасибо. Mike1979 Russia (talk) 08:29, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Честно говоря, я удивлен, что спор еще продолжается. Я не вижу серьезных проблем. LexKurochkin (talk) 13:28, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mother Superior House Hotkov Monastery 2021-12-10 0791.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 09:59, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VQ-BPT Boeing 737-800 UTair VKO 2022-08-03 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me if you correct the WB, it's off --Poco a poco 08:16, 21 September 2022 (UTC)  Done New variant. --Mike1979 Russia 15:31, 21 September 2022 (UTC)  Support I'd have gone a bit further but good to go, I believe --Poco a poco 19:11, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RA-73062 Boeing 737-500 UTair VKO 2022-08-03 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question This one also looks too greenish, could you, please check white balance? --LexKurochkin 19:59, 20 September 2022 (UTC)  Done New variant. --Mike1979 Russia 15:31, 21 September 2022 (UTC)  Support OK for me --LexKurochkin 22:13, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Esders and Scheffals Merchant House Saint Petersburg 2022-08-03 2059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:52, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Esders and Scheffals Merchant House Saint Petersburg 2022-08-03 2082.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:38, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pokrovsky Hotkov Monastery 2021-12-10 0770.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:48, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Спасибо!

Спасибо за голос для моего изображения!

Пётр Тарасьев (talk) 15:51, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Не за что. Mike1979 Russia (talk) 15:54, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dom Sovetov Saint Petersburg 2022-08-04 2141.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 23:37, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint Nicholas Hotkov Monastery 2021-12-10 0771.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good enough quality, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 23:39, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Theotokos of Tikhvin Kolomna 2022-02-22 1406.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 23:40, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uspensky Brusensky Convent Kolomna 2022-02-22 1362.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Leaning to the right IMO --Ermell 18:50, 25 September 2022 (UTC)  Done --Mike1979 Russia 15:51, 26 September 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:31, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint Nicholas Hotkov Monastery 2021-12-10 0790.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:23, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dom Sovetov Saint Petersburg 2022-08-04 2121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 15:08, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moskovskaya Square Saint Petersburg 2022-08-04 2124.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:33, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Dormition of the Theotokos Kolomna 2022-02-22 1396.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 05:53, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yamskaya Tower Kolomna 2022-02-22 1365.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hillopo2018 10:14, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Nicholas Gostiny Kolomna 2022-02-22 1404.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:19, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Dormition of the Theotokos Kolomna 2022-02-22 1397.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:53, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint Mitrofan of Voronezh Hotkov Monastery 2021-12-10 0802.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:26, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyatnitskie Gate Kolomna 2022-02-22 1400.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:21, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuprin House Kolomna 2022-02-22 1385.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:49, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marinkina Tower Kolomna 2022-02-22 1413.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:55, 26 September 2022 (UTC)  Support Yes. --Milseburg 14:05, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Novo-Mihailovsky Palace Saint Petersburg 2022-08-03 2104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Sky should be cropped a bit. --Ermell 19:05, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aleksey Tolstoy on the Khimki Reservoir 2022-07-10 1939.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 08:07, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aleksey Tolstoy on the Khimki Reservoir 2022-07-10 1944.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:12, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross Kolomna 2022-02-22 1409.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:04, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mikhailovskiye Gate Kolomna 2022-02-22 1415.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:04, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RA-73215 Airbus A319-100 Rossiya - Russian Airlines VKO 2022-08-03 2030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Image was declined on September 29. I think you did some improvements before the renomination. --Milseburg 13:25, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uspensky Brusensky Convent Kolomna 2022-02-22 1382.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 17:51, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Theotokos Joy of All Who Sorrow Losino-Petrovsky 2021-10-29 0581.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:08, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trinity Bridge Saint Petersburg 2022-08-03 2108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The sky color is definitely off --Poco a poco 20:25, 27 September 2022 (UTC) I reduced green and extremely added red in the sky. Is it ok? (But I don't see difference) --Mike1979 Russia 09:43, 1 October 2022 (UTC)  Support Better, thanks --Poco a poco 22:15, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aleksey Tolstoy on the Khimki Reservoir 2022-07-10 1953.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Not so well focused, but ok IMO. --Sebring12Hrs 09:00, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Granovitaya Tower Kolomna 2022-02-22 1368.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The right part is leaning on a lot, but not the left. Is the building really leaning like that ? --Sebring12Hrs 17:49, 2 October 2022 (UTC) Yes. The wall tilted out, the tower expand upward. You can focus on the pillar on the right and the edge of the tower next to the wall. --Mike1979 Russia 14:13, 4 October 2022 (UTC)  Support I think you are right ! Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:17, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malenkiy Princ on the Khimki Reservoir 2022-06-10 1529.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:49, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malenkiy Princ on the Khimki Reservoir 2022-06-10 1548.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:49, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Khirurg Razumovskiy on the Khimki Reservoir 2021-08-01 9720.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:49, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malenkiy Princ on the Khimki Reservoir 2022-06-10 1532.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:24, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Protection of the Theotokos 2022-03-20 1451.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:22, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Snt Nicholas Church Suzdal 2016-06-23 6229.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:50, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Peter and Paul Church Suzdal 2016-06-23 6230.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:53, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dormition of the Theotokos Cathedral Vladimir 2016-06-23 6277.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:50, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dormition of the Theotokos Cathedral Vladimir 2016-06-23 6310.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:52, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow North River Terminal in winter 2021-02-07 pic5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:50, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fyodor Dostoyevskiy on the Khimki Reservoir 2022-07-17 1984.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:13, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fyodor Dostoyevskiy on the Khimki Reservoir 2022-07-17 1993.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:13, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fyodor Dostoyevskiy on the Khimki Reservoir 2022-07-17 2002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:13, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lazhecnikova 13 Kolomna 2022-02-22 1370.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:53, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! South Residential Building Hotkov Monastery 2021-12-10 0788.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scorpena class SSK.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:41, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scorpena class SSK Kalvari variant.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 11:51, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mikhail Kutuzov on the Khimki Reservoir 2021-08-22 9926.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:47, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oyashio class submarine.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:14, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aleksandr Suvorov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-31 Pic 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:39, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Afanasiy Nikitin in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-30 Pic 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:38, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karl Marks in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-31 Pic 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak dust spot above the building. --Ermell 08:37, 16 October 2022 (UTC) Fixed. --Mike1979 Russia 10:15, 16 October 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:46, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Type 214 submarine.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:14, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Afanasiy Nikitin in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-30 Pic 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:15, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konstantin Korotkov on the Khimki Reservoir 2021-06-18 8582.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:27, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konstantin Korotkov on the Khimki Reservoir 2021-06-18 8585.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:27, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konstantin Korotkov on the Khimki Reservoir 2021-06-18 8597.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, without spots --Michielverbeek 08:59, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikolay Chernyshevskiy in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-26 Pic 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There's a dust spot above the cloud, that is near to the three yellow cranes. If you remove that it's a QI imo --FlocciNivis 17:53, 24 October 2022 (UTC)  Done --Mike1979 Russia 15:23, 25 October 2022 (UTC)  Support Thanks! It's good quality now. --FlocciNivis 16:18, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shlyuzovoy-111 in Butakovskiy Gulf 2016-05-26 Pic 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:45, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikolay Chernyshevskiy in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-26 Pic 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but please remove the two spots left from the cranes --Michielverbeek 17:41, 23 October 2022 (UTC)  Done --Mike1979 Russia 15:41, 24 October 2022 (UTC) Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:28, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mikhail Sholokhov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-21 Pic 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:47, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mikhail Sholokhov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-21 Pic 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:47, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viking Truvor in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-21 Pic 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AnonymousGuyFawkes 20:29, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mikhail Sholokhov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-21 Pic 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Geo coordinates would be nice or a category for the location. --Ermell 18:52, 29 October 2022 (UTC) Category added --Mike1979 Russia 09:24, 30 October 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Thanks. --Ermell 17:47, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viking Truvor in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-21 Pic 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 06:20, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port-Artur 2.0 in North River Port 2016-05-04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 17:48, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aleksandr Svirskiy and NBS-107 in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-04 Pic 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The buildings at the very left are leaning in. --Ermell 11:36, 4 November 2022 (UTC)  Done --Mike1979 Russia 12:56, 4 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:02, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konstantin Simonov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-04 Pic 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:35, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konstantin Simonov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-04 Pic 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:35, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viking Truvor in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-21 Pic 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:01, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viking Truvor in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-21 Pic 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:01, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rikhard Zorge in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-04 Pic 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:17, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rikhard Zorge in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-04 Pic 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Description missing, location missing. --XRay 06:46, 5 November 2022 (UTC) Location category and description added --Mike1979 Russia 08:04, 5 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. (Geo location would be nice too.) --XRay 08:45, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Butakovskiy Gulf 2016-05-04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you correct the rightward lean a little? --Acroterion 02:06, 5 November 2022 (UTC)  Done --Mike1979 Russia 09:04, 5 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Acroterion 13:21, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikolay Chernyshevskiy in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-26 Pic 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 05:17, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mikhail Sholokhov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-21 Pic 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 18:52, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rikhard Zorge in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-04 Pic 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:51, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rikhard Zorge in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-04 Pic 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:45, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aleksandr Pushkin in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-04 Pic 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:51, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aleksandr Pushkin in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-04 Pic 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:30, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rikhard Zorge in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-04 Pic 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:30, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aleksandr Pushkin in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-04 Pic 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Description missing --F. Riedelio 09:13, 11 November 2022 (UTC) Description added --Mike1979 Russia 16:14, 11 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 06:52, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aleksandr Pushkin in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-04 Pic 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:26, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rikhard Zorge in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-04 Pic 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The disturbing spot in the sky should be removed. --Ermell 22:26, 15 November 2022 (UTC) Spot deleted. --Mike1979 Russia 08:31, 16 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:41, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bell Tower Nativity of the Theotokos Monastery Vladimir 2016-06-23 6281.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:28, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mstislav Rostropovich in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-06 Pic 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:44, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mstislav Rostropovich in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-06 Pic 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:45, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mstislav Rostropovich in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-06 Pic 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Acroterion 03:20, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mstislav Rostropovich in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-06 Pic 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Acroterion 03:18, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Please do not overwrite files

---

I noticed that you uploaded a file using the name File:Volgo-Don 189 in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-21 Pic 01.JPG. A file by this name already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its previous version. If the file that you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you. For more information, please see Commons:Overwriting files.

--A1Cafel (talk) 08:50, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konstantin Fedin in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-06 Pic 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:42, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konstantin Fedin in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-06 Pic 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:42, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konstantin Fedin in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-06 Pic 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:42, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alexandre Benois in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-06 Pic 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:53, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alexandre Benois in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-06 Pic 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:08, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alexandre Benois in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-06 Pic 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:08, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BTT-28 in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-06 Pic 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:15, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mstislav Rostropovich in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-06 Pic 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --~~~~

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bell Tower Nativity of the Theotokos Monastery Vladimir 2016-06-23 6409.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 12:33, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Togliatti in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-06 Pic 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:59, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Togliatti in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-06 Pic 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:02, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konstantin Fedin in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-06 Pic 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:31, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konstantin Simonov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-06 Pic 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:15, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konstantin Simonov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-06 Pic 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:15, 28 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:33, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konstantin Fedin in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-06 Pic 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:15, 28 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:33, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Togliatti in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-06 Pic 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:21, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trafalgar class SSN.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:32, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vanguard class SSBN.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:32, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soyuz in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-06 Pic 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please fix the WB (see original version for reference). --C messier 20:16, 6 December 2022 (UTC) I reverted WB. Is it ok now? --Mike1979 Russia 08:58, 7 December 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:05, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soyuz in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-06 Pic 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Why the two versions have so different white balance? The original (but smaller photo) looks more realistic. --C messier 21:21, 5 December 2022 (UTC) I tried to correct WB. Could you help me and mark neutral zone should be? --Mike1979 Russia 08:02, 6 December 2022 (UTC) Try to set WB at 5100 K. It is a late evening photo, during golden hour, so it is logical for everything to look golden. --C messier 16:00, 6 December 2022 (UTC) I set wb at 5100K. Is it ok? --Mike1979 Russia 09:38, 7 December 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:04, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shlyuzovoy-111 in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-07 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:48, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OT-2459 in Butakovskiy Gulf 2016-05-07 Pic 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:21, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OT-2459 in Butakovskiy Gulf 2016-05-07 Pic 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:17, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konstantin Simonov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-07 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:27, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Georgiy Zhukov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-07 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:27, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Georgiy Zhukov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-07 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:27, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Georgiy Zhukov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-07 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:11, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Georgiy Zhukov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-07 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:00, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konstantin Simonov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-07 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:00, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OT-2459 in Butakovskiy Gulf 2016-05-07 Pic 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:11, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shlyuzovoy-111 in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-07 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:57, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OT-2459 in Butakovskiy Gulf 2016-05-07 Pic 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:12, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konstantin Simonov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-07 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:50, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow North River Station 2012-07-27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:17, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castell de Xàtiva Capella de Sant Jordi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:34, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tsezar and Ilya Muromets and President in Zakharkovo 2016-05-08 Pic 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:50, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lenin in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-08 Pic 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:26, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A-90 Orlyonok in museum 2016-05-08 Pic 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:41, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konstantin Simonov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-06 Pic 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 19:54, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volgo-Don 5072 in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-08 Pic 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 10:29, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castell de Xàtiva Finestra de la sala del Duc de Calàbria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me if you fix the CA --Poco a poco 15:20, 19 December 2022 (UTC) CA deleted --Mike1979 Russia 15:43, 19 December 2022 (UTC) A bit better, but too visible yet. Look at the top left corner --Poco a poco 09:35, 20 December 2022 (UTC) Fixed --Mike1979 Russia 10:42, 21 December 2022 (UTC) There was still a bit of green CA left, I removed it in a new version. If you like it we need now a third person who reviews the image. Otherwise you can give a another try on your own. --Poco a poco 09:30, 24 December 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 21:39, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lenin in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-08 Pic 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:03, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OT-2459 in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-08 Pic 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:38, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OT-2459 in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-08 Pic 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please add a description. --C messier 20:56, 30 December 2022 (UTC)  Done. Description added. --Mike1979 Russia 10:00, 31 December 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:53, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lenin in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-08 Pic 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please add a description. --C messier 20:56, 30 December 2022 (UTC)  Done. Description added. --Mike1979 Russia 10:00, 31 December 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:53, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A-90 Orlyonok in museum 2016-05-08 Pic 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I would crop a bit of the sky. Also needs a description. --C messier 20:56, 30 December 2022 (UTC)  Done. Description added. But i like this composition. Orlyonok is directed to the sky. --Mike1979 Russia 10:02, 31 December 2022 (UTC) Have you tried to have the horizon at the lower one third line of the ruel of thirds? --C messier 19:53, 1 January 2023 (UTC)  Done your variant. --Mike1979 Russia 15:42, 2 January 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:49, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SSN688.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Valo139 19:57, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SSN719.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Valo139 19:57, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SSN772.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Valo139 19:57, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dom Sovetov Saint Petersburg 2022-08-04 2143.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMHO it needs more categories conserning what is depicts and an english description. --C messier 21:20, 6 January 2023 (UTC)  Done --Mike1979 Russia 07:14, 7 January 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 15:48, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Mike1979 Russia/Archive 2,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:39, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andrey Rublyov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 Pic 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:35, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aleksandr Grin in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 Pic 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:35, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soyuz in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:47, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aleksandr Grin in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 Pic 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a dust spot to the right of the tower in the background and one above the cranes --FlocciNivis 10:17, 13 January 2023 (UTC)  Done --Mike1979 Russia 08:54, 14 January 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:36, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aleksandr Grin in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 Pic 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 20:24, 12 January 2023 (UTC)  Comment In all five images the file description is missing. See guidelines. --Palauenc05 22:22, 14 January 2023 (UTC) Descriptions added --Mike1979 Russia 06:38, 15 January 2023 (UTC) Good for me now --PantheraLeo1359531 15:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Otchizna in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:42, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aleksandr Grin in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 Pic 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, I like those two seagulls as a detail --FlocciNivis 16:46, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SSBN726 Ohio.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:59, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SSGN726 Ohio.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:59, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Naryn (ship)

The image of the ship by that name has nothing to do with any images of Naryn the town. --Cosal (talk) 14:31, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

No. The ship is named after the city of Naryn, respectively, the categories must be connected. And I ask you to refrain from kickbacks until a consensus is found. Mike1979 Russia (talk) 18:33, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapitan Shitov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 Pic 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:35, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rechnoy-67 in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 Pic 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:35, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rechnoy-67 in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 Pic 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --多多123 17:16, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TO-1004 in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 Pic 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --多多123 19:06, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Knyazhna Viktoriya in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 Pic 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Florstein 18:13, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Knyazhna Viktoriya in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 Pic 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 23:07, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Knyazhna Viktoriya in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 Pic 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Florstein 18:13, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mikhail Bulgakov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 Pic 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:21, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Knyazhna Viktoriya in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 Pic 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Florstein 18:13, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mikhail Bulgakov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 Pic 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are several black spots in the sky, have added notes for them - can they be removed? Otherwise good quality. --Mike Peel 20:24, 17 May 2023 (UTC) Fixed. Thank you. --Mike1979 Russia 07:27, 18 May 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 19:28, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SSN585.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:28, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SSN594.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:28, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mikhail Bulgakov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 Pic 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aleksandr Grin in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 Pic 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 07:24, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volgo-Don 99 in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 Pic 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:55, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port-Artur 2.0 in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:01, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dmitriy Furmanov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 Pic 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:01, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dmitriy Furmanov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 Pic 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:02, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borodino in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 Pic 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:02, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borodino in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 Pic 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:02, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SSN637.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good to me --PantheraLeo1359531 17:12, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borodino in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 Pic 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:47, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borodino in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 Pic 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:47, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VDNKh Fountain Stone Flower 2016-06-10 5427.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:42, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VDNKh Yakov Yakubov Mansion 2016-06-10 5468.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 07:41, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VDNKh YaK-42 2016-06-10 5498.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 07:41, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borodino in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 Pic 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MVmath20 10:45, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lenin in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-08 Pic 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --NoNickFinder 08:28, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapitan Shitov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 Pic 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 07:05, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TO-1004 in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 Pic 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 07:05, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mikhail Bulgakov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 Pic 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 07:05, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borodino in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 Pic 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 07:45, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VDNKh Tadorna ferruginea 2016-06-10 5490.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 17:25, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS-2 in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-10 Pic 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:23, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ivan Bunin in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-10 Pic 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:23, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ivan Bunin in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-10 Pic 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 07:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Igor Stravinskiy in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-10 Pic 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:44, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Igor Stravinskiy in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-10 Pic 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:23, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Artwork for Plane and Tank Encyclopedia

Hello Mike, I was sent by the team of the Tank Encyclopedia and Plane Encyclopedia (https://tanks-encyclopedia.com/ , https://plane-encyclopedia.com/) after we saw your artwork on Wikimedia. We have appreciated that it was very high quality and were wondering if you would be interested in joining our team, we would need more such illustrations. We also pay for illustrations, although it is under the regular market rates. Let me know, Stan, tanks-encyclopedia@gmail.com Tankencyclopedia (talk) 13:07, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 850 Let Moskve on the Moskva River 2021-05-22 8384.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please improve the sharpness and please add the geo location. --XRay 04:50, 15 June 2023 (UTC) Sharpness improved and geo added in metadata --Mike1979 Russia 06:43, 15 June 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:24, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mikhail Bulgakov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 Pic 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:26, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mikhail Bulgakov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 Pic 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:01, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Igor Stravinskiy in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-10 Pic 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments please add description --Stepro 07:29, 20 June 2023 (UTC) Added --Mike1979 Russia 08:44, 20 June 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 19:53, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maxim Gorky in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-10 Pic 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments please add description --Stepro 07:29, 20 June 2023 (UTC) Added --Mike1979 Russia 08:44, 20 June 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Stepro 15:32, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maxim Gorky in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-10 Pic 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments please add description --Stepro 07:29, 20 June 2023 (UTC) Added --Mike1979 Russia 08:44, 20 June 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 19:53, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borodino in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-10 Pic 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments please add description --Stepro 07:29, 20 June 2023 (UTC) Added --Mike1979 Russia 08:44, 20 June 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Stepro 15:32, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borodino in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-10 Pic 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments please add description --Stepro 07:29, 20 June 2023 (UTC) Added --Mike1979 Russia 08:44, 20 June 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 19:53, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Knyazhna Viktoriya in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-09 Pic 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The few dust spots ins the sky should be removed. --Ermell 13:34, 17 June 2023 (UTC) Dust spots deleted. Thank you --Mike1979 Russia 14:48, 18 June 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:43, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konstantin Simonov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-07 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Espandero 09:55, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gr. Pirogov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-10 Pic 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --1municipio 09:28, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gr. Pirogov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-10 Pic 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Piediluco 18:44, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gr. Pirogov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-10 Pic 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Piediluco 18:44, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapitan Shitov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-10 Pic 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Piediluco 18:44, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gr. Pirogov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-10 Pic 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Acroterion 16:35, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapitan Yerofeyev in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-12 Pic 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:24, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapitan Yerofeyev in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-12 Pic 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 20:35, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volgo-Don 191 in Butakovskiy Gulf 2016-05-12 Pic 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:45, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toliman in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-12 Pic 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:45, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toliman in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-12 Pic 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:45, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zosima Shashkov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-12 Pic 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:17, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zosima Shashkov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-12 Pic 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:17, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zosima Shashkov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-12 Pic 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:56, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zosima Shashkov in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-12 Pic 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 7624 barge in Khimki Reservoir 2016-05-12 Pic 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:56, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ChS7-253 Brest-Moscow Train Belorussky Rail Terminal 2023-07-08 6366.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:19, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 July 2023 (UTC)