User talk:Moroder/Archives 2012-1
Spina bifida
editI took the liberty of placing the image where it should go, and to reformulate the scope. Bonne jounée...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:11, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
- thanks --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 08:53, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Woodcarved polychromed reliefs by Martin Vinazer
editPerfect for the insertion but it lacks the scope I am proposing, "polychromed reliefs Woodcarved Vinazer by Martin." Good Day. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you! But the following makes more sense: "Polychromed reliefs woodcarved by Martin Vinazer". Unfortunately I do not know how to insert the text. Could you please let me know? Regards--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:32, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
- No problem, you edit the SET (as if you wanted to vote) and you add the text under the heading "Scope". --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:46, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
- Ah... got you. Thanks --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:55, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
- No problem, you edit the SET (as if you wanted to vote) and you add the text under the heading "Scope". --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:46, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
editCongratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ultrasound images of fetal spine, spina bifida.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Piciulëi in La Poza Sëlva .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sella y Saslong dinviern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Set Promoted
editCongratulations!
The set of images you
nominated
for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Polychromed reliefs woodcarved by Martin Vinazer.
Polychromed reliefs woodcarved by Martin Vinazer.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
editCongratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statues of Sacred Heart of Jesus Christ woodcarved by Ludwig Moroder.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Murfreit Sella.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Val Lietres y Pra da Ri Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Parish church of Bula Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maria hilf Gnadenbildin Pufels Gröden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Col de Sëura Runcadic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Val Lasties input.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Set Promotion
editCongratulations!
The set of images you
nominated
for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Nuchal scan.
Nuchal scan.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Puez.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cal da la Sone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! La Canssles Furcela de Forces de Selles Val Gardena.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Niblintiera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sas Rigais Furchëtta Sas dla Porta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Orgun nuef dlieja dedite Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! St. Annakirch in Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cir Stevia Pic in Gröden.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Luech Plazola te Sëlva.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Image use
editHello,
You have took some very wonderful and great images, just wanted to drop a note as requested per license of usage of your images. On http://www.wallpaperfor.me/photography/langkofel-dolomites
Of the image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ASaslonch_da_Sacun_ora.JPG
If the work has not been attribute appropriately or inefficiently please free to contact via our email: ping@wallpaperfor.me
Thank you for enriching and providing great images for everybody.
Wallpaperfor.me
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mastle y la Odles.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saslonch da Sacun ora.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! King David by Johann Baptist Moroder-Lusenberg Urtijëi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Puflatscher Schwaige.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
editCongratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
August Runggaldier: bronze of his son.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Skiing under the Murfreit towers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hananias and Paulus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lech Crespëina vs Col dala Pieres Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lech Dragon 2005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lech dl Dragon bis.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lech Dragon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File:Portal Annakirche St. Ulrich Gröden.jpg
editHello, Wolfgang! I have already corrected that is necessary... ;) --Aleks G 14:22, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cuecnes in Gröden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Portal Annakirche St. Ulrich Gröden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Forces de Siëlles Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Nervous ?
editHi Moroder,
- I'm so sorry the crop of the door with lions in Vienna makes you "nervous"... Is it something I could do to improve ? Thanks for funny comment anyway !--Jebulon (talk) 23:52, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Jebulon, you know good aesthetics is profound wellbeeing --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 23:58, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Holzbrücke über den Eisack in Atzwang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Törggele Brücke in Kastelruth über den Eisack.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Urtijëi from Bulacia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sermon-on-the-mount.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
QI Landscapes
editI loved all 4 of your landscapes at screen resolution but when I went full resolution I thought they all seemed unusually soft especially for the fine camera you were using. Did you sharpen them before uploading? Saffron Blaze (talk) 22:52, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks a lot for your appreciation - Usually I try to manipulate pictures coming out of my camera as little as possible. I prefer to have soft images and I don't like to sharpen them at all. In these pictures taken some years ago I used a low aperture, as I was accustomed with analogue photography. Now, I was told that an aperture higher then 8 reduces the sharpness of the image. That is the reason why they might look smooth and not sharp enough. Is this the point?. Best regards --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 00:50, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
- Diffraction above F8 can soften images although F10 isn't too bad, but it might be in play with those at F16. I suspect that it may have more to do with the lack of shrpening in the PP. Digital images usually need some sharpening either in camera or during PP due to the nature of the sensors. Regardless of the reason I think a small bit of sharpening could realy make these pop even at full res. Cheers. Saffron Blaze (talk) 01:05, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot for your information, but I still have to become more confident with sharpening. I use Photoshop Elements, do you have suggestions? --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 01:09, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
- I use Photoshop CS 3 so I suspect you will have "Unsharp mask" under "Sharpening" in the Filters list. Try it with conservative setting. I use a small radius (1.7 - 2.4 pixels) and perhaps just 20-40% with threshold at 1 or 0. That is usually enough to sharpen up a hi res image without degrading anything. You don't want to do too much as that will emphasise any noise in the image as well. I tried it with this file Plans_de_Cunfin_y_Dantersasc_te_Gherdëina_.jpg and I think you would like the results. Saffron Blaze (talk) 12:08, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot for your information, but I still have to become more confident with sharpening. I use Photoshop Elements, do you have suggestions? --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 01:09, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
- Diffraction above F8 can soften images although F10 isn't too bad, but it might be in play with those at F16. I suspect that it may have more to do with the lack of shrpening in the PP. Digital images usually need some sharpening either in camera or during PP due to the nature of the sensors. Regardless of the reason I think a small bit of sharpening could realy make these pop even at full res. Cheers. Saffron Blaze (talk) 01:05, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
Valued Image Set Promoted
editCongratulations!
The set of images you
nominated
for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Wood carved altar angels by Jakob Crepaz-Maidl.
Wood carved altar angels by Jakob Crepaz-Maidl.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Set Promoted
editCongratulations!
The set of images you
nominated
for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Chiesa dell'Ospedaletto Atlantes by Josse de Corte, Venice.
Chiesa dell'Ospedaletto Atlantes by Josse de Corte, Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Engel Friedhof Berlin.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cross on the Crespëina pass Gröden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Jëuf de Crespëina Parc Naturel Puez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Station on St. Jakob church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Peg Wooden Dolls
edit- Hi, you nominated this set of images. What do you think about my comment?--MrPanyGoff 14:54, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Valued Image Set Promoted
editCongratulations!
The set of images you
nominated
for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Gesuati church statues by Giovanni Maria Morlaiter, Venice.
Gesuati church statues by Giovanni Maria Morlaiter, Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chedul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Plans de Cunfin y Dantersasc te Gherdëina .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Langkofelhütte Gherdeina.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Col dala Pieres Ostflanke (SE) Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Val Gardena Cisles.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Set Promotion
editCongratulations!
The set of images you
nominated
for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Peg wooden dolls.
Peg wooden dolls.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.
RE:intentional
editNo, my reasoning is whether the composition is correct? The seagull should not be distracting from the actual subject as the existence of the seagull would draw at least some attention of the person viewing the image to itself. Please see image guidelines.
- The arrangement of the elements within the image should support depiction of the subject, not distract from it.
- Foreground and background objects should not be distracting.
If the seagull adds positively to the image, then I'll support but if it is distracting, then I'll oppose.--Gauravjuvekar (talk) 06:11, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Gauravjuvekar! Thanks a lot for clarifying this and the WP POV to me. In that sense I should say that it was intentional. I strongly believe that the seagull is not distracting like a small antenna which was retouched, on the contrary imho the bird makes the monument with a long and very interesting history and which is not in a museum but on a very trafficked square, much livelier and does not disturb imo the artistic value of it or the observer who wants to appreciate it from the artistical point of view. I could have waited otherwise for the bird to fly away, while imho it is a good "snapshot".I hope you'll agree with that. Best regards!--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:40, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Colleoni in Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
chromatische Aberrationen
editHallo Wolfgang,
wenn ich sowas nicht sofort erledige, hab ich's schnell wieder vergessen: ich schulde dir noch eine Antwort von hier. Die chromatischen Aberrationen habe ich gelindert indem ich den ungefähren Bereich mit den diesen in Photoshop markierte und dann (nur) die Sättigung der Farbe, die der jeweilige Farbsaum hatte, ordentlich reduzierte. Das Ergebnis hat mich selbst positiv überrascht, klappt ganz gut. Viele Grüße vom Niederrhein --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 21:00, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hallo, hab's natürlich bemerkt an den Tauben aber der snapshot ist einfach einmalig, um ihn nicht zu publizieren...Werde nun versuchen, dieses alte Foto etwas zu verbessern. Gruss--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:08, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hab's nun versucht, aber CA ist auch auf der Schrift, also überall wo es Kontrast gibt. Glaube kaum dass ich das reparieren kann. --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:18, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! St. Ulrich Ludwig Moroder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bartolomeo Colleoni di Andrea Verrocchio laterale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Kirche St. Jakob hinten
editHallo Wolfgang, ich war vorhin über die Kandidaten für Qualitätsbilder auf dein Foto File:Kirche St. Jakob hinten.JPG gestoßen, dass mir ganz ausgezeichnet gefallen hat. Leider ist bei deiner Bearbeitung der Datei das Rauschen und die chromatische Abberation verstärkt worden. Ich habe die Datei deshalb eben nochmal mit der neuesten Version von Adobe Lightroom nachbearbeitet. Das Ergebnis findest Du unter File:Kirche St. Jakob hinten-2.JPG. Allein die von dir vorgenommene perspektivische Korrektur konnte ich allerdings nicht nachvollziehen (hier müsstest du allso eventuell nochmal nachhelfen). Ich hoffe, dass meine Bearbeitung trotzdem von Nutzen ist. Das Bild gefällt mir nämlich außergewöhnlich gut und es wäre schade, wenn es die Kandidatur als Qualitätsbild nicht erfolgreich abschließen könnte. Herzliche Grüße nach Italien. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:06, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hallo Frank, es freut mich sehr, dass dir das Bild gefällt und danke für die Bearbeitung. Ich habe schon bemerkt, dass mit der Aufhellung durch Photoshop, ein Halo um den Kirchturm entstanden ist oder besser gesagt sichtbar wurde. Leider habe ich mit der Entfernung von CA usw keine Erfahrung und vielleich auch nicht das richtige Werkzeug dafür. Wass ich nicht ganz verstehe, dass du die Perspektive nicht korrigieren konntest. Grüsse an Berlin (Meine Tochter studiert an der Kunsthochschule Weißensee in Berlin Textildesign) --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 08:55, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- oops, dachte du wärst Berliner. Also Gruss an Napa Valley --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:00, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Kein Problem. Ich bin gebürtiger Niedersachse, nun wohnhaft in Sonoma. Bei der Perspektive hatte ich eine vertikale Korrektur versucht, dabei reichte der Platz im oberen Bildbereich aber nicht mehr aus (sobald ich den Schieberegler für die vertikale Perspektivkorrektur bediene, bewegt sich die Kirchturmspitze aus dem sichtbaren Bereich heraus). Keine Ahnung, wie sich das besser lösen lässt. Mir war aber ohnehin vor allem wichtig, die chromatische Abberation zu entfernen. Ansonsten finde ich das Foto nämlich große Klasse. Herzliche Grüße aus Kalifornien und nochmals Glückwunsch zu dem hochwertigen Bild. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:47, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Frank, according to user:Carschten there is an other problem with this image. Your correction of CA caused the church to become less sharp - do you think you can fix it? Regards --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:59, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- Kein Problem. Ich bin gebürtiger Niedersachse, nun wohnhaft in Sonoma. Bei der Perspektive hatte ich eine vertikale Korrektur versucht, dabei reichte der Platz im oberen Bildbereich aber nicht mehr aus (sobald ich den Schieberegler für die vertikale Perspektivkorrektur bediene, bewegt sich die Kirchturmspitze aus dem sichtbaren Bereich heraus). Keine Ahnung, wie sich das besser lösen lässt. Mir war aber ohnehin vor allem wichtig, die chromatische Abberation zu entfernen. Ansonsten finde ich das Foto nämlich große Klasse. Herzliche Grüße aus Kalifornien und nochmals Glückwunsch zu dem hochwertigen Bild. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:47, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- oops, dachte du wärst Berliner. Also Gruss an Napa Valley --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:00, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Canal Grande from the Accademia bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! San Pantalon in Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! DSC 8750 modifié-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Hello Moroder,
- Thanks for helpful comments and kind support.
- I understand what you mean about the "tilt" of this picture. I've tried a correction by rotation, but when the issue is solved below (near the capitals, for instance), then I have a new tilt above, the series of helmets is no more horizontal.
- That is why I think it is a natural perspective effect, not a "distortion". I could "stretch" the picture artificially, but in this case, the result will look unnatural (I've tried). I'm sorry.
- As for the crop. Do you think I must crop out the capitals of the columns (then the "tilt" will look very more "visible") ?
- Next time (if any...), I'll try to take a frontal picture ... e basta !
- Anyway, thanks again for support.
- As Austrian, I don't know what do you think about the capital of your country, but as foreign visitor, I can say that I am absolutely fan !
- I hope that my pictures of Vienna will be attractive for new other visitors, because it is really a city to be seen !
- Greetings from Paris, --Jebulon (talk) 01:05, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Jebulon, Thanks a lot for reviewing and appreciating so many of my pictures. I feel that not always perspective shoult be artificially altered as I already expressed in some of my reviews. Definetly I believe that taking out the capitals of your pictures would do a lot of good, I havn't tried it though on your foto.
- To tell you the truth I am not Austrian but South Tyrolean, former Austria and now we are Italians... That does not mean that I don't like our former capital... Best regards Wolfgang --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:11, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Caro fratello d'Italia ;) !
- I'm trully and deeply sorry with my mistake about your nationality. I hope I did not hurt you in any way, if yes, I apologize, and obviously it was not my intention... Really, I was sure you were Austrian (You have a german name, you speak german "als Muttersprache", most of your pictures have a "south germanic" mood IMO, even the ones of the sculptures by your ancestors...). History of our old Europe is somewhat strange, isn't it ? Again, I'm sorry. But Vienna is a very nice city, anyway!--Jebulon (talk) 10:25, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Mon cher ami, you don't have to be sorry and by no way to apologize because my nationality is a bit complex and I feel more Austrian or Tyrolean (you noticed it from my pictures...), althogh I don't regret to have the Italian citizenship since they took off Berlusconi (which is a shame) from the government. Vienna is marvellous (it is one of the first big cities I visited in my youth) and I appreciate the many beautyful pictures you shot there. Stay well!--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:07, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Jebulon, Thanks a lot for reviewing and appreciating so many of my pictures. I feel that not always perspective shoult be artificially altered as I already expressed in some of my reviews. Definetly I believe that taking out the capitals of your pictures would do a lot of good, I havn't tried it though on your foto.
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marmolada nelle Dolomiti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hotel al Gambero Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gondola lift to Pass Gardena Sella Ronda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Val Gardena - Gröden winter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Damiano Chiesa by Adolf Wildt Bozen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Canal Grande from Rialto Bridge Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monument Bartolomeo Colleoni by Andrea Verrocchio Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bartolomeo Colleoni di Andrea Verrocchio laterale sinistra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aesculus hippocastanum in Urtijëi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
The (not so) very old roof of St. Stephen
editHi Moroder !
- Thank you so much for improvements of my picture. IMO, we'll share a promotion soon !
- Obviously you are right with your very useful and interesting comments.
- I'll remove my first nomination.
- And I definitely love Vienna !--Jebulon (talk) 12:42, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
- It is a great pleasure to give you suggestions--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:01, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Valued Image Set Promotion
editCongratulations!
The set of images you
nominated
for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Angels statues by Josef Limburg, St. Hedwig cemetery in Berlin.
Angels statues by Josef Limburg, St. Hedwig cemetery in Berlin.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Structures roofs St Stephen's cathedral Vienna modifié-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
- Maybe we could share this one ? ;)--Jebulon (talk) 16:38, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- how do you mean share? it's yours! I don't really count it as mine!--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:52, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- OK thanks, I take it for mine !--Jebulon (talk) 16:43, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saint Elisabeth group Rudolf Moroder detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Elisabeth of Hungary Moroder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Marmolada nelle Dolomiti
editHi! Sei italiano vero? Sono un utente di Wikipedia in italiano da 4 anni pensavo che i diritti si "trasferissero"... Cercherò di muovermi anche su Commons... ;) è vietato parlare italiano? Cioè, c'è una tacita regola che dice di usare l'inglese? Grazie! --Pottercomuneo (talk) 08:59, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
- Su Commons, lo dice anche il nome, sono permessse tutte le lingue, ma preferisco l'inglese come "lingua universale" per non escludere gli altri, ma se hai + facilitá in italiano sei il benvenuto, cordialità --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:59, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Beggar from the group of Saint Elisabeth Rudolf Moroder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tor Exner, Tor Bruneck Sella.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Crëusc de Secëda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Set Promotion
editCongratulations!
The set of images you
nominated
for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Bartolomeo Colleoni monument, Venice.
Bartolomeo Colleoni monument, Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kirche Sankt Michel Kastelruth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Siegesdenkmal Bozen west.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Set Promotion
editCongratulations!
The set of images you
nominated
for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Group of Saint Elisabeth by Rudolf Moroder.
Group of Saint Elisabeth by Rudolf Moroder.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Hello
editHello, my name is Regina and I am a student of Alicante, Spain. I am doing a homework and i would like know if I can use this picture. Thank you for the attention and sorry to bother you.
- Hello Regina it is no bother at all, I'm glad if you use my pictures but it would be a pleasure to know which one. Good success --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:00, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
The mysterious story of the floating sarcophagus
editsalut, Ô Moroder !
- Thanks for (numerous) comments about my pictures.
- Do you know the place ?
- as you surely know, the Kaisergruft in Vienna is a crypt (a series of crypts) under the Capuchins church. As a crypt, it is very dark. And as it is a cemetery, I thought that I could not (respect due to the resting place) use mono nor tripod, neither flashlight, for the pictures of sarcophagi. Then, I had to wait for long exposures, then I had to put my camera along walls, fences, etc... In order to avoid motion blur.
- In this special case, I took a very very tilted picture, and therefore I had to correct the tilt with my software by rotation.
- But obviously, when the sarcophagus was at least reasonably horizontal, the rest of the picture around was no more a good rectangle, obviously!
- so I decided to chose one of the colors of the real background (light grey, from the wall), and I made a mask (manually) all around the main subject.
- That is the tale of the quest of the QI !--Jebulon (talk) 22:03, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
- BtW, there is no garbage behind the mermaid, only the scenery of the not-in-use attraction ! --Jebulon (talk) 22:03, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
- It is a pleasure and very constructive to have a fair discussion with you. Sorry for the garbage, the right word oviously in a metaphoric sanse would be junk. I am not good in making backgrounds but don't yoiu think you can make a fading backgound which probably would look a bit more solid. I understand that the conditions to take the pictures were not good specially without a tripod and a light, for that the picture is really good. - I don't remember the Kaisergruft very well, I've been there in the sixties.
- BtW, there is no garbage behind the mermaid, only the scenery of the not-in-use attraction ! --Jebulon (talk) 22:03, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
I don't use a denoising tool but what ads noise in my opinion is the tool to lighten the dark spots like in the altars (you promoted one and declined the other (I agree the picture is not really top) best regards --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:50, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
PS:the Erzherzogin sarcophagus: no, I did not use a tripod. I just hold firmly my camera along a wall (or a column), and let's go, hope and pray, with the remote control. Anyway, impressive place, no doubt...--Jebulon (talk) 16:09, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Beggar from the group of Saint Elisabeth Rudolf Moroder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saint-Ulrich-in-heaven.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saint-Ulrich-in-the-battle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Anges and Jesus Jakob Crepaz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The Sacrifice of Isaac Franz Xaver Kirchebner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Parish church Urtijei internal view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
edit★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Saint Elisabeth group Rudolf Moroder detail.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Elisabeth group Rudolf Moroder detail.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Santantone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saint Antony church Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File:Villa Riffeser Stufan Urtijëi.jpg braucht noch eine Lizenzvorlage
editWäre es möglich, noch eine Lizenzvorlage hinzuzufügen? Danke. -- RE rillke questions? 16:23, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Costamula de sot Urtijëi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Resciesa from Secëda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saint Agnes in the parish church of Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Villa-Grohmann.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hotel Stetteneck Urtijëi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wilhelm Senoner Statuen auf Raschötz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bridge in Venice by Calatrava.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aspen Mountain trees.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wilhelm Senoner Resciesa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Hop i solved this one
edithttp://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Graphic_Lab/Photography_workshop#Chromatic_aberration :-)
- Greetings --Grunpfnul (talk) 23:59, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Römerberg houses on the west side.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Erwähnung
editFreut mich, dass ich weiterhelfen konnte. Eine Erwähnung wäre nicht nötig gewesen, aber tut der Konsistenz der CC Lizenz keinen Abbruch ;-) Für's nächste Mal muss es aber wie gesagt nicht sein (gilt nur für meine Person - ich muss nicht überall stehen *g*). Gerne bearbeite ich auch über meine Talk Page Anfragen, falls Sie noch einmal Bilder korrigiert haben möchten. Ansonsten drücke ich noch die Daumen, dass es mit der QI Nominierung der beiden Bilder klappt :-) --Grunpfnul (talk) 01:26, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Waidbruck Pfarrkirche Haus Solderer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saint Josef and child sculpture Gröden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lusenberg-Virgin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Variante
editDanke für die Variante, aber es führt wohl kein Weg daran vorbei, mich nochmal auf die Brücke zu hocken ;-) Ist zum Glück nicht sonderlich weit von mir entfernt. Danke Dir auf jeden Fall --Grunpfnul (talk) 11:03, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Hystogramme
editHallo, ich habe deine Kommentare gelesen und -obwohl ich eben gerade eine neue Version von File:Glyptothek, Königsplatz, Múnich, Alemania14.JPG hochgeladen haben-, frage ich mich wie ich zum Abschluß kommen soll, was am Hystogramm zu ändern ist, wenn ich es mir anschaue. Worauf muss man überhaupt achten?? Sorry für diese trivialen Fragen, aber noch einen weiteren Schub werde ich mit deinen ersten Ratschlägen leider nicht weiterkommen können. Viele Grüsse, Poco a poco (talk) 21:26, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
- Wie du hier siest ist das Spektrum mit den hellen Licht werten leer. Mit Photoshop oder anderen Programmen kannst du dein Bild erweitern... Gruss
--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:45, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
- Zuerst vielen Dank für deine Hilfe. Ich habe eben gerade die 3 Bilder editiert und erneut hochgeladen (auch andere), bitte, sag mal Bescheid, was du davon hälst, viele Grüsse, Poco a poco (talk) 20:31, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Virgin parish church Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Skiing Aspen Mountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
edit★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Elisabeth of Hungary Moroder.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Elisabeth of Hungary Moroder.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Palazzo Pisa Brescia - Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aspen Mountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rosary-Madonna-Mersa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Architecture in Brescia - window.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Haus Solderer Waidbruck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Revivalism (architecture) in Brescia house Cadeo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cathedral of Brescia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|