Peterchiapperino

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jack Johnson 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:55, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Jack Johnson 2014.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jack Johnson 2014.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:12, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jack Johnson (musician).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I'm afraid the picture is in the wrong category and scope is not formatted correctly. --P e z i (talk) 11:00, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
  

 Support OK i put in in rigth scope, i suppose. And yes its best. --Mile (talk) 13:18, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment Thanks Mile! I couldn't figure out quite how to do that. I appreciate the help and support! Peter Chiapperino (talk) 20:37, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zion Thompson.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A little bit noisy, bit IMO still QI. --XRay 12:51, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
John Digweed.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Needs geocoding. Yann (talk) 20:55, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
  •  Done now geocoded
•  Support Best in scope. Geocoding not relevant imho. -- Jaqen (talk) 21:17, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Well, it is, if not taken in a studio. Yann (talk) 10:59, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:56, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brandon Barnes Rise Against.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 19:27, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 February 2023 (UTC)