User talk:Poco a poco/2021-10

Archives 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Duna en Sossusvlei, Namibia, 2018-08-06, DD 002.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maragota (Labrus bergylta), Parque natural de la Arrábida, Portugal, 2020-07-23, DD 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:14, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tiburón azul (Prionace glauca), canal Fayal-Pico, islas Azores, Portugal, 2020-07-27, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:42, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sepia común (Sepia officinalis), Parque natural de la Arrábida, Portugal, 2020-07-21, DD 66.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:39, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raya gavilán (Rhinoptera bonasus), Monte da Guia, isla de Fayal, Azores, Portugal, 2020-07-26, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:39, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulpo común (Octopus vulgaris), Parque natural de la Arrábida, Portugal, 2020-07-21, DD 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:41, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vieja colorada (Sparisoma cretense), Monte da Guia, isla de Fayal, Azores, Portugal, 2020-07-26, DD 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:41, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulpo común (Octopus vulgaris), Parque natural de la Arrábida, Portugal, 2020-07-21, DD 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 05:53, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Tiburón azul (Prionace glauca) y submarinista, canal Fayal-Pico, islas Azores, Portugal, 2020-07-27, DD 08.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tiburón azul (Prionace glauca) y submarinista, canal Fayal-Pico, islas Azores, Portugal, 2020-07-27, DD 08.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tiburón azul (Prionace glauca), canal Fayal-Pico, islas Azores, Portugal, 2020-07-27, DD 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 16:02, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vieja colorada (Sparisoma cretense), Monte da Guia, isla de Fayal, Azores, Portugal, 2020-07-26, DD 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:32, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuente del Tritón, La Valeta, isla de Malta, Malta, 2021-08-25, DD 222-224 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:57, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre de Xlendi, isla de Gozo, Malta, 2021-08-22, DD 89-91 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:57, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de San Pablo, Mdina, isla de Malta, Malta, 2021-08-25, DD 141-143 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:54, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basílica de San Jorge, Victoria, isla de Gozo, Malta, 2021-08-22, DD 05-07 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:58, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Albergue de Castilla, La Valeta, isla de Malta, Malta, 2021-08-25, DD 234-236 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:54, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Pinzón de manglar (Camarhynchus heliobates), isla Santa Cruz, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-26, DD 05.JPG

Hi there! I think it's not Camarhynchus heliobates - much too thin bill, yellow color in plumage shouldn't be here (look at eBird pictures and pictures in this publication) and also Camarhynchus heliobates doesn't live on Santa Cruz island - it's endemic to Isabela Island. However, I have no idea what species is this. Could you check it, please? Pikador (talk) 06:56, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

• Did you notice my message? Pikador (talk) 07:49, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Hi Pikador, yes I saw your message but had so far no time to look up for a better id. I couldn't find a better species after a few minutes investigation, will search with more time again this weekend. Sorry for not giving you a better answer, I'm not a biologist --Poco a poco (talk) 11:59, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
    • Wait Pikador, I kept looking and got a lead, it could be Myiarchus magnirostris, do you agree?. According to this page is one of the 3 species of Passeriformes that live in that island Poco a poco (talk) 12:06, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
      • I don't think it's Myiarchus magnirostris, colours don't match (for example head brown not grey, legs black not yellowish, no sign of yellow colour on wings). It looks to me like a juvenile of Yellow Warbler (Setophaga petechia aureola) - subspecies which lives at Galapagos. Look at this picture - I think this is it! Pikador (talk) 12:56, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

EDIT So, what do you think? Pikador (talk) 08:36, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi Pikador, from the likelihood point of view you are right, as this is the most spread species in the island. I updated the title and description page, thank you for not giving up! :) And sorry for the mess in this page, it's a bit crowded Poco a poco (talk) 09:36, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Eltiodepedro, again

Hi Poco, sorry to trouble you again. Regarding this, I cannot edit es:Wikipedia:Solicitudes de verificación de usuarios to place the request, as it is protected (I have only edited es.wiki 4 times, so I assume I don't have the necessary flag). Could you perhaps place this request there on my behalf (or just block the duck)?

== Otro títere de Eltiodepedro ==

;Lista de usuarios implicados
* {{checkuser|JoshuaPereira}}
* {{checkuser|MARKVITOR313}} (títere conocida que no está "stale")
* [[:Categoría:Wikipedia:Títeres bloqueados de Eltiodepedro]]

;Motivación
Las cuentas comparten intereses:
# [[White tiger]]: [https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=White_Tiger&type=revision&diff=138767988&oldid=138100700 JoshuaPereira]; [https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=White_Tiger&type=revision&diff=138100700&oldid=137748395 MetalBaby232]; [https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=White_Tiger&type=revision&diff=137157095&oldid=137141213 Fan de Randy Rhoads]
# [[Anexo:Miembros de Twisted Sister]]: [https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anexo%3AMiembros_de_Twisted_Sister&type=revision&diff=138768049&oldid=138272530 JoshuaPereira]; [https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anexo%3AMiembros_de_Twisted_Sister&type=revision&diff=135804764&oldid=122883015 IsaiManoloCahuanaGil]
# [[David Donato]]: [https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=David_Donato&type=revision&diff=138662512&oldid=138077760 JoshuaPereira]; [https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=David_Donato&type=revision&diff=138077760&oldid=137926891 MetalBaby232]; [https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=David_Donato&type=revision&diff=137443149&oldid=136853933 LINKOLORE]
# Mismos eliminaciones de [[Vinnie Vincent Invasion]]: [https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vinnie_Vincent_Invasion&type=revision&diff=138464827&oldid=138247907 JoshuaPereira]; [https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vinnie_Vincent_Invasion&type=revision&diff=137153037&oldid=137152998 Fan de Randy Rhoads]

Firmado: ~~~~

;Resolución
(a completar por un usuario checkuser)

Thanks for your help. Эlcobbola _talk 18:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi elcobbola, I just placed the request here, thank you! --Poco a poco (talk) 19:05, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cornago, La Rioja, España, 2021-08-31, DD 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:48, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita de San Baudelio, Casillas de Berlanga, Soria, España, 2021-08-28, DD 28-30 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, a very impressive room. --Aristeas 08:51, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio del Marqués de Casa Torre, Igea, La Rioja, España, 2021-08-31, DD 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:47, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Morena negra (Muraena augusti), Monte da Guia, isla de Fayal, Azores, Portugal, 2020-07-26, DD 40.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Morena negra (Muraena augusti), Monte da Guia, isla de Fayal, Azores, Portugal, 2020-07-26, DD 40.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basílica de San Jorge, Victoria, isla de Gozo, Malta, 2021-08-22, DD 14-16 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:36, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de San Pablo, Mdina, isla de Malta, Malta, 2021-08-25, DD 138-140 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:39, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de San Pablo, Mdina, isla de Malta, Malta, 2021-08-25, DD 150-152 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:39, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardines de Barrakka Superior, La Valeta, isla de Malta, Malta, 2021-08-25, DD 243-245 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:45, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Mateo, Qrendi, isla de Malta, Malta, 2021-08-25, DD 53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:45, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio del Marqués de Casa Torre, Igea, La Rioja, España, 2021-08-31, DD 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:57, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa María, Óbidos, Portugal, 2021-09-09, DD 16-18 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:56, 4 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:56, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Óbidos, Óbidos, Portugal, 2021-09-09, DD 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 09:52, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Óbidos, Óbidos, Portugal, 2021-09-09, DD 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:06, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Óbidos, Portugal, 2021-09-09, DD 01-10 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:10, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Possible FP

Any thoughts on whether this photo is worth a try at FP? It has been on my list for a while but I am not sure whether the glare of the lights near the altar and the window might count against it. Thought I'd give you the chance to make any improvements you feel are appropriate before I give it a go. Cmao20 (talk) 16:07, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Cmao20: Thank you for your message! It's a nice catch, and you got my support :) I uploaded a new version with small improvements of curves and sharpness. As you like churches very much, what do you think about these other shots?: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 or 9, Poco a poco (talk) 18:54, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Poco a poco, thanks so much for making the changes, will put up the nomination when my current ones are finished.

Your other shots are great, and I think all would stand a chance at FP. Overall my favourites are 1, 2, and 7. Individual thoughts on them are as follows:

• 1 is brilliant and to me is clearly FP. I think the golden light near the altar is really special, and I like the way you've framed the photo with the pillars at either side. The art on the walls is pretty cool too.
• Likewise 2 is superb, a really nice beautiful and detailed ceiling that's IMO the equal at least of your other FP ceilings.
• 3 is good and I would vote for it but it is not my favourite, I understand that there was almost certainly no way to avoid it but it does disturb me a bit that the sky is so much lighter at the left than the right. Are some of the highlights blown? I've not checked the histogram but it does superficially at least look like they might be.
• 4 is a good ceiling and deserves the star but it doesn't interest me as much as 2, there is less to look at in terms of interesting artwork and decoration, and it is a little dark for my taste though I am sure the church looked like that. A little bit of blue fringing on the window at the top.
• 5 is a close up of the altar from 1 but the view is different enough to feature IMO, and it's just a really nice altar with great light.
• 6 is a really interesting photo of a stunning motif, if a bit ornate for my taste. There are a couple of ghosts, which don't bother me at all, but I would expect one or two opposes for them at FPC.
• 7 is IMO close to faultless, beautifully framed and composed, and should be a clear FP.
• 8 likewise although personally I don't find the content quite as interesting. Maybe a bit too much featureless floor? But it should pass FP easily.
• 9 has an unusual and effective wider crop, and avoids the ghosts that we have in 6, but it does bother me a little that the Virgin Mary statue on the right has part of its head cut off.

I am giving these my harshest review, I would support all 9 at FP, but I think it's most helpful if I give you a clear idea of which ones I think the best are. Cmao20 (talk) 09:46, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Also I would add this to your candidates list, it is a really bright, inviting church captured in a big wide photo with lots to see. Cmao20 (talk) 09:49, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Wow, Cmao20, that was an exhaustive feedback. I was expecting rather your first sentence were you say what are your fauvorite shots, but I hadn't expect feedback to each of them. I agree mostly with your assessment, but I like 5 in fact more than the image of the whole nave, the light and setting are great (and here I also like the frame). Apart from 1, 2 and 7 I also like 3 very much and agree with you, there is room to improve it, what I'll do. Thank you! Poco a poco (talk) 09:53, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

As promised, I reworked 3 and uploaded a new version, --Poco a poco (talk) 14:41, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Convento de Jesús, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-09, DD 75-77 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 21:38, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Julián, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-08, DD 10-12 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Dey.sandip 16:38, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia del convento de Jesús, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-10, DD 04-06 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 08:34, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa María de Gracia, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-10, DD 32-34 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 08:34, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Sebastián, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-10, DD 28-30 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 08:34, 5 October 2021 (UTC)  Comment Rotate 180°. Knopik-som,Poco a poco --PetarM 10:36, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Julián, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-08, DD 07-09 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 21:06, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Julián, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-08, DD 13-15 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:46, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Julián, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-09, DD 62-64 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:46, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa María de Gracia, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-10, DD 44-46 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 21:06, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erizos de mar (Paracentrotus lividus), Parque natural de la Arrábida, Portugal, 2020-07-31, DD 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Musicaline 04:33, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa María de Gracia, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-10, DD 32-34 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:07, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa María de Gracia, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-10, DD 35-37 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:07, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa María de Gracia, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-08, DD 26-28 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Armenak Margarian 08:35, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia del convento de Jesús, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-10, DD 01-03 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Armenak Margarian 08:32, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Azulejos, iglesia del convento de Jesús, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-10, DD 07-09 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 09:16, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Convento de Jesús, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-09, DD 72-74 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:19, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basílica de San Ulrico y Santa Afra, Augsburgo, Alemania, 2021-06-04, DD 26-28 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:36, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basílica de San Ulrico y Santa Afra, Augsburgo, Alemania, 2021-06-04, DD 05-07 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:32, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza del Ayuntamiento, Augsburgo, Alemania, 2021-06-04, DD 32-34 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality! --Radomianin 11:37, 8 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:41, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Prudential Plaza, Chicago, Illinois, Estados Unidos, 2012-10-20, DD 02.jpg

Yours sincerely, Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:50, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Sorry Ellin Beltz but apart from the fact that you left a notice here just 5 min prior to the file deletion and this file is not mentioned in the linked page, the cloud gate is hidden behind trees and you can barely see it. I don't agree with this deletion at all. I depict a building without architectural value and here applies de minimis. Do you really believe that the deletion is justified in this case? regards Poco a poco (talk) 20:12, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

I have no idea why the notice was so short before deletion, the mass deletion I was working on had been in place since early 2021. Sometimes the system does strange things. Perhaps you are forgetting no FOP in USA for recently constructed buildings. Two Prudential Tower (both pictured and reflected in the copyrighted Cloud Gate) is new enough to have copyright protection. The Prudential building ("Prudential One") is from 1955, so it's only 66 years old. I hope this helps you understand why most of that series had to go. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:56, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

@Ellin Beltz: Umm U.S. has FOP for buildings but not other works of art in public spaces. Plus as it dates from pre-1990 period, it is PD = {{PD-US-architecture}}. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:49, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

JWilz12345: We need a date on that Prudential Two building which is from the 1990s. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:43, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

@Ellin Beltz: I think the year determination is no longer relevant. Even copyrighted U.S. buildings are allowed here as per {{FoP-US}}. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:17, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

JWilz12345:According to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/United_States#Freedom_of_panorama

"Buildings are works subject to copyright in the U.S. according to 17 USC 102(a)(8) since the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act was passed in 1990. It applies to all buildings that were completed after December 1, 1990, even if begun before, or where the plans were published after that date." Prudential Two building was completed after that date. I know this because I had an office in the building from the day the building was built until 1997. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:21, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

@Ellin Beltz: perhaps I got confused with the "One" building from 1950s. But at any rate, there are no problems for U.S. buildings here, whether pre-1990 or post-1990. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:43, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Sebastián, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-10, DD 19-21 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --CuriousGolden 21:08, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa María, Óbidos, Portugal, 2021-09-09, DD 13-15 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 12:40, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Sebastián, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-10, DD 10-12 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 12:40, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Julián, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-08, DD 04-06 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 15:04, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Óbidos, Óbidos, Portugal, 2021-09-09, DD 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 15:04, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edificio de la Guardia Principal, La Valeta, isla de Malta, Malta, 2021-08-25, DD 198.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:55, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de San Pablo, Mdina, isla de Malta, Malta, 2021-08-25, DD 137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:12, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basílica de San Jorge, Victoria, isla de Gozo, Malta, 2021-08-22, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:12, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Molino de Ta' Kola, Xagħra, isla de Gozo, Malta, 2021-08-23, DD 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:13, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Basílica de San Ulrico y Santa Afra, Augsburgo, Alemania, 2021-06-04, DD 26-28 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Basílica de San Ulrico y Santa Afra, Augsburgo, Alemania, 2021-06-04, DD 26-28 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santuario Nacional de la Virgen de Ta 'Pinu, Għarb, isla de Gozo, Malta, 2021-08-22, DD 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 10:14, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Ġgantija, isla de Gozo, Malta, 2021-08-23, DD 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 13:00, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre de Xlendi, isla de Gozo, Malta, 2021-08-22, DD 81.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 19:06, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Óbidos, Portugal, 2021-09-09, DD 43-49 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very nice panorama, good quality. --Domob 15:56, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita de San Baudelio, Casillas de Berlanga, Soria, España, 2021-08-28, DD 04-06 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Basílica de San Jorge, Victoria, isla de Gozo, Malta, 2021-08-22, DD 05-07 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Basílica de San Jorge, Victoria, isla de Gozo, Malta, 2021-08-22, DD 05-07 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Parroquia de Santa Clara de Asís, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 03.JPG, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Parroquia de Santa Clara de Asís, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 03.JPG. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotes Tor, Augsburgo, Alemania, 2021-06-04, DD 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:38, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtmetzg, Augsburgo, Alemania, 2021-06-05, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:26, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza del Ayuntamiento, Augsburgo, Alemania, 2021-06-04, DD 29-31 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:27, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perlachturm, Augsburgo, Alemania, 2021-06-04, DD 35-37 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:27, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Augsburgo, Augsburgo, Alemania, 2021-06-04, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:29, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Lago Pippin, Copper Center, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-22, DD 115-118 PAN.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Sebastián, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-10, DD 25-27 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:51, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Sebastián, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-10, DD 16-18 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:51, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Sebastián, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-10, DD 13-15 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:51, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Julián, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-08, DD 01-03 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:53, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-09, DD 56-58 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. The flags are blurry, but I guess it doesn't matter. The building looks good. --Knopik-som 08:31, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templos de Tarxien, isla de Malta, Malta, 2021-08-25, DD 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:45, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Concatedral de San Juan, La Valeta, isla de Malta, Malta, 2021-08-25, DD 246-248 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:57, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Marcos, Fuggerei, Augsburgo, Alemania, 2021-06-05, DD 18-20 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo but heavy noise and chromatic noise on the benches. --Steindy 11:27, 8 October 2021 (UTC) I made some improvements and also reduced the noise and chroma noise --Poco a poco 11:15, 9 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Okay now, good quality. --Steindy 17:11, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa María de Gracia, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-08, DD 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:18, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Sebastián, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-10, DD 22-24 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:18, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo, Sines, Portugal, 2021-09-12, DD 40-48 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 20:11, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Óbidos, Óbidos, Portugal, 2021-09-09, DD 25-31 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --CuriousGolden 08:02, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Óbidos, Óbidos, Portugal, 2021-09-09, DD 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:14, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista del Gran Puerto, isla de Malta, Malta, 2021-08-25, DD 240-242 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:40, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro de Punta de Capelinhos, Isla de Fayal, Azores, Portugal, 2020-07-26, DD 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:25, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa María, Óbidos, Portugal, 2021-09-09, DD 19-21 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 06:28, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa María de Gracia, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-10, DD 41-43 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 06:27, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuerte de Santiago do Outão, Setúbal, Portugal, 2020-07-19, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:30, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuerte de Santiago do Outão, Setúbal, Portugal, 2020-07-19, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:11, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Comercio, Óbidos, Portugal, 2021-09-09, DD 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:28, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Convento de Jesús, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-08, DD 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:28, 16 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:29, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa María de Gracia, Portugal, 2021-09-10, DD 38-40 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. Just as a question: it looks like the aspect ratio could be improved, I would gess that it should be narrower. (But if you say that it is realistic as it is, good so.) --Aristeas 06:31, 15 October 2021 (UTC) You're completely right, new version uploaded! --Poco a poco 06:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Thank you very much! --Aristeas 07:10, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza del Ayuntamiento, Augsburgo, Alemania, 2021-06-04, DD 38-40 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 17:06, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza del Ayuntamiento, Augsburgo, Alemania, 2021-06-04, DD 41-43 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:10, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuggerei, Augsburgo, Alemania, 2021-06-05, DD 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:12, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo e iglesia de San Pedro, Cornago, La Rioja, España, 2021-08-31, DD 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:19, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cornago, La Rioja, España, 2021-08-31, DD 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pink CAs (see the note). Also, please add more sharpness. --Halavar 15:07, 18 October 2021 (UTC)  New version uploaded still I believe that this critique is being at a very high level --Poco a poco 16:32, 18 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --Halavar 19:10, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Cadreita, Navarra, España, 2021-08-31, DD 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:19, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antigua parroquia, Sartaguda, Navarra, España, 2021-08-31, DD 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:19, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ħaġar Qim, isla de Malta, Malta, 2021-08-25, DD 83.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:02, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ħaġar Qim, isla de Malta, Malta, 2021-08-25, DD 67.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:02, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta principal, Mdina, isla de Malta, Malta, 2021-08-25, DD 131-134 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:57, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta de San Sebastián, Portugal, 2021-09-10, DD 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Armenak Margarian 06:58, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porta da Vila, Óbidos, Portugal, 2021-09-09, DD 54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:57, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza del Ayuntamiento, Augsburgo, Alemania, 2021-06-04, DD 44-46 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Óbidos, Óbidos, Portugal, 2021-09-09, DD 36-42 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very impressive, good quality. --Steindy 14:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de San Felipe, Setúbal, Portugal, 2020-07-19, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de San Felipe, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-12, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. In the middle of the sky is a light dust spot and should be removed. --Steindy 14:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de San Felipe, Setúbal, Portugal, 2020-07-19, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:40, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Convento de Jesús, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-09, DD 75-77 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Convento de Jesús, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-09, DD 75-77 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Nuestra Señora de la Anunciada, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-08, DD 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:56, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Sebastián, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-08, DD 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:56, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia del convento de Jesús, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-08, DD 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I will support. Good quality. --Andrey Korzun 11:54, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuerte de Santiago do Outão, Setúbal, Portugal, 2020-07-19, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I will support. Good quality. --Andrey Korzun 11:54, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Nuestra Señora de la Anunciada, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-08, DD 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:56, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle de Maximilian, Augsburgo, Alemania, 2021-06-04, DD 23-25 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but the cars on both sides shold be cutted. They looks like long vehicles. --Steindy 11:38, 8 October 2021 (UTC) The subject of the image is a street, cars belong there. Getting rid of all cars would spoil the image with a very disturbing crop at the bottom. I could crop the car on the right, would that be enough? --Poco a poco 11:15, 9 October 2021 (UTC) @Poco a poco: I made a sugestion. --Steindy 17:09, 13 October 2021 (UTC) Ok, thanks, understood now and accepted, will upload a new version soon --Poco a poco 05:57, 14 October 2021 (UTC)  New version uploaded --Poco a poco 06:06, 15 October 2021 (UTC)  Support To get things going (no answer in 5 days): IMHO very good quality. --Aristeas 09:05, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Commons Photographers meeting on October 30th

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm happy to invite you to our next virtual meeting next Saturday,  October 30. This time, our colleagues User:Dey.sandip from India and User:Ermell from Germany will talk about their work.

If you're interested in joining this meeting, please sign up on the page below:

• 5th virtual meeting of the Commons Photographers User Group

I'm very much looking forward to this event and I hope you'll be able to join.

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:31, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Convento de Jesús, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-08, DD 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:41, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Julián, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-09, DD 59-61 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:41, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Comenda, Setúbal, Portugal, 2020-07-19, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:44, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de Bocage, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-09, DD 65-67 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:45, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Óbidos, Óbidos, Portugal, 2021-09-09, DD 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 12:23, 20 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 19:47, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Convento de Jesús, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-09, DD 78-80 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia del Salvador, Sines, Portugal, 2021-09-12, DD 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Contrast perhaps a bit flat for my taste --DXR 10:45, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santiago, Óbidos, Portugal, 2021-09-09, DD 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 09:56, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Lorenzo, Azeitão, Portugal, 2021-09-10, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 09:56, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Iglesia del convento de Jesús, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-10, DD 04-06 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia del convento de Jesús, Setúbal, Portugal, 2021-09-10, DD 04-06 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand

เรียน สมาชิกวิกิมีเดีย เนื่องจากเราเห็นว่าท่านเคยเข้าร่วมการประกวดรูปถ่ายที่จัดขึ้นโดยวิกิมีเดียประเทศไทย เราจึงอยากเชิญชวนท่านเข้าร่วมการประกวดรูปถ่าย Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand ซึ่งจะจัดขึ้นระหว่างวันที่ 15 พฤศจิกายน – 15 ธันวาคม 2564 นี้ มีรูปแบบในการประกวด 7 หัวข้อ คือ บุคคลในวิทยาศาสตร์ รูปจากกล้องจุลทรรศน์ สื่อที่ไม่ใช่รูปถ่าย รูปชุด สัตว์ป่ากับธรรมชาติ ดาราศาสตร์ และหมวดหมู่ทั่วไป หากท่านมีความสนใจในการเข้าร่วมการประกวด ท่านสามารถไปยังหน้าเว็บเพจ Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand เพื่ออ่านข้อมูลเพิ่มเติมและอัปโหลดไฟล์ของท่านภายในช่วงของการประกวดที่ได้กล่าวไว้ ขอแสดงความนับถือ ทีมผู้จัด Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand วิกิมีเดียประเทศไทย

Dear Fellow Wikimedians, Seeing that you have participated in one or more photo contests organized by Wikimedia Thailand, we would like to invite you to participate in Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand which will be held between 15 November – 15 December 2021. There are 7 categories in which you can submit: People in Science, Microscopy images, Non-photographic media, Image sets, Wildlife & nature, Astronomy, and General category. If you are interested in participating, you can visit the web page Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand/en for more information and to upload your files within the period of the contest. Kind Regards, The organizing team of Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand Wikimedia Thailand

--Karto1 (talk) 11:06, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Algar do Carvao, isla de Terceira, Azores, Portugal, 2020-07-25, DD 68-70 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Algar do Carvao, isla de Terceira, Azores, Portugal, 2020-07-25, DD 68-70 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 31 October 2021 (UTC)