Wikimedia Commons

User talk:Poco a poco/2011

< User talk:Poco a poco
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Carschten in topic Taj Mahal
Learn more about this page
WARNING: This page is an archived Commons user's talk page and shall not be edited anymore. If you want to leave me a message, please, click here. Thank you.

File:Paris 2010Feb 218.jpg edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
 
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Paris 2010Feb 218.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 21:58, 8 January 2011 (UTC)Reply


Hi Poco a poco,
please do not use meaningless filenames for your uploads such as File:Paris 2010Feb 217.jpg, instead use meaningful filenames. --Túrelio (talk) 22:03, 8 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Dubai_Creek-Dubai8871.JPG edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Dubai_Creek-Dubai8871.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 18:31, 28 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Atlantis_Hotel-Jumeirah_Palm-Dubai4029.JPG edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Atlantis_Hotel-Jumeirah_Palm-Dubai4029.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

84.62.200.57 15:13, 30 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Atlantis_Hotel-Jumeirah_Palm-Dubai4043.JPG edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Atlantis_Hotel-Jumeirah_Palm-Dubai4043.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

84.62.200.57 15:15, 30 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Atlantis_Hotel-Jumeirah_Palm-Dubai3977.JPG edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Atlantis_Hotel-Jumeirah_Palm-Dubai3977.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

84.62.200.57 07:31, 31 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Atlantis_Hotel-Jumeirah_Palm-Dubai9062.JPG edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Atlantis_Hotel-Jumeirah_Palm-Dubai9062.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

84.61.177.49 16:07, 31 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Atlantis_Hotel-Jumeirah_Palm-Dubai3984.JPG edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Atlantis_Hotel-Jumeirah_Palm-Dubai3984.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

84.61.177.49 16:15, 31 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Saludos y AYUDA!!!!! edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Podrias colgar y categorizar estas fotos por mi???? Muchas gracias si no explicame como se cuelgan no obstante me harias un GRAN FAVOR!!!

http://www.la-moncloa.es/Multimedia/Fotos/Presidente/2011/04012011OndaCero2.htm --CAMPEONES_2008_Y_2010 14:21 27 feb 2011 (UTC)

Sí, puedes subirlas y ni siquiera tienes que citar las fuentes (aunque vamos, nadie se enojará si las citas). Dejo a tú dispocisión el aviso legal de la-moncola (el cuál... bueno, tú mismo podrías haberlo visto si sólo hacías click en 'aviso legal' en la web que dejaste.

{{cita |www.la-moncloa.es es un dominio en internet de la titularidad del Ministerio de la Presidencia (CIF S-2811001-C). Complejo de la Moncloa. 28071 Madrid. Tfno.: 91.321.4000.

Los contenidos, organización y elección de enlaces de las páginas de la-moncloa.es han sido seleccionados y/o coordinados por la Secretaría de Estado de Comunicación del Ministerio de Presidencia. Esta información puede ser utilizada en parte o en su integridad sin necesidad de citar fuentes.

El aviso legal no es suficiente, ¿dan permiso para modificar estas imágenes y venderlas (por ponerte un ejemplo)?. Además, no veo porque he de ser yo quien las hubiera subido, puedo mostrarte como hacerlo. Saludos, --Poco a poco (talk) 18:27, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply


File:Jumeirah Hotel-Dubai3328.JPG edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Jumeirah Hotel-Dubai3328.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Note that I have also nominated:

CT Cooper · talk 14:51, 28 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Mezquita_Sheikh_Zayed-Abu_Dhabi3439.JPG edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Mezquita_Sheikh_Zayed-Abu_Dhabi3439.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 14:06, 12 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Mezquita_Sheikh_Zayed-Abu_Dhabi3443.JPG edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Mezquita_Sheikh_Zayed-Abu_Dhabi3443.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 14:06, 12 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Mezquita_Sheikh_Zayed-Abu_Dhabi3484.JPG edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Mezquita_Sheikh_Zayed-Abu_Dhabi3484.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 14:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Buildings-Abu_Dhabi3876.JPG edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Buildings-Abu_Dhabi3876.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 14:12, 12 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Buildings-Abu Dhabi3872.JPG edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Buildings-Abu Dhabi3872.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 14:12, 12 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Buildings-Abu_Dhabi3872.JPG edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Buildings-Abu_Dhabi3872.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 17:46, 12 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Eiffel-Tower_Paris_Feb2010.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Eiffel-Tower_Paris_Feb2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Grcampbell (talk) 06:08, 30 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Paris_2010Feb_218.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Paris_2010Feb_218.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Grcampbell (talk) 06:10, 30 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Eiffel-Tower_Paris_Feb2010.jpg edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Eiffel-Tower_Paris_Feb2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Grcampbell (talk) 20:40, 7 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Estambul-Turquia9494.JPG edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo, kannst du bitte einmal die Beschreibung & Kategorisierung von File:Estambul-Turquia9494.JPG überprüfen? Ich mag nicht so recht glauben, dass du die richtige Moschee erwischt hast, denn die Kuppel dort sieht ganz anders aus. -- H005 21:17, 23 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago37 comments1 person in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Poco a poco!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

 

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 03:51, 4 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parque Nacional de los-Arcos-Utah2508.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   CommentBeautiful view. But I am not convinced by the quality. More opinions?--ArildV 01:03, 13 November 2011 (UTC)*   Support Chromatic aberration around the hole, but good choice of angle.--Archaeodontosaurus 06:37, 13 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Mezquita Sheikh Zayed-Abu Dhabi3483.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mezquita Sheikh Zayed-Abu Dhabi3483.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I like it, it's QI for me -- Achim Raschka 10:06, 20 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Australian Pelican-St Helens-Tasmania02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality., QI for me --J. Lunau 09:37, 25 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Expo-Zaragoza-España17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OI for me, I like the perspective --J. Lunau 10:07, 25 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dunedin-Nueva Zelanda09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very nice. --Saffron Blaze 14:09, 25 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

QIC mezquita edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago5 comments1 person in discussion

¡Hola! Te apoyo en una de tus candidatas a QI, pero creo que deberías hacerle un pequeño arreglo, me parece que el cable de la lámpara debería verse completamente vertical. ¡Gracias! Un saludo. Kadellar (talk) 19:46, 10 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Muchas gracias por tu rapidez, y muchísimas por tus halagos! Últimamente estoy más interesado en la fotografía y algo he aprendido, pero aún queda mucho jaja. Por cierto, lo siento mucho porque no quiero molestar, pero creo que aún la puedes dejar un pelín más recta. Muchas gracias por todo otra vez. Kadellar (talk) 20:06, 10 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Ah no espera, no se había recargado! ¡¡Lo siento!! Kadellar (talk) 20:07, 10 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Siempre puedo echar un vistazo. No soy muy de revisiones, porque normalmente las que están muy bien ya están "cogidas" y otras están ahí ahí y todavía no me atrevo a juzgarlas ni para bien ni para mal. Seguramente no sepa decirte si las aprobaría o no, pero supongo que puedo darte alguna recomendación. Dime cuáles son y te comento. Kadellar (talk) 20:24, 10 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Pues sí son unas pocas, pero tranquilo, que yo les echo un ojo encantado, a ver si mañana saco un ratillo. Kadellar (talk) 20:47, 10 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Propuestas QI edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion
  • Ya estoy aquí. Te voy comentando por filas, que así voy avanzando, aunque primero te digo una cosa en general. La diferencia de calidad de imagen entre las fotos que has hecho con las Casio y las que tienes con la Canon es evidente, será más fácil que aprueben las de la Canon. De la primera fila (hasta la mezquita de Estambul), las que mejor veo son las dos primeras y la de la Alhambra. La del juego de pelota con lagarto incluido jeje. Eso sí, en esa y en la de la mezquita azul, sobre todo en la de la mezquita, tenías que haber tenido cuidado con el corte, porque el objeto de la foto se acerca demasiado al borde. Pasa en alguna más de otras filas. Es mejor que la foto "respire", que tenga aire, espacio, salvo que tengas que cortar deliberadamente una parte, pero no es el caso. Otra cosa que debes tener en cuenta en las fotos que presentes es que el horizonte quede recto, por ejemplo en la tercera foto, la de la pirámide. De la primera fila, la que peor veo es la de Ronda, tiene mucho ruido y algo de aberración cromática (CA) en las casas y pierde mucha definición. La del observatorio tampoco me convence. Recuerda que todo son sugerencias y recomendaciones, es mi visión personal, presenta todas las que quieras que no me va a importar, puede que tú creas que una sí puede ser QI, que yo lo dude, pero que otro usuario también crea que es apta. En caso de duda, preséntalas y a esperar (bastante, normalmente). Espero haberte servido de ayuda ;) Kadellar (talk) 17:26, 11 December 2011 (UTC) PD: vaya vueltas te has dado por el mundo jejeje.Reply
  • La segunda fila está mejor. Me he tomado la libertad de subir una nueva versión de la de la mezquita de Abu Dhabi, debías de tener la lente sucia y había algunas manchas. Las que más me gustan son la de Diwan-i-Khas y la del Taj Mahal bajo el arco, aunque si me dejas le arreglo algo de CA que tiene justo en el borde del arco. Las otras dos del Taj Mahal están también muy bien, pero hay que cambiar un par de cosillas. La de la fuente está un poquitín torcida, te van a decir que una toma de ese estilo debe estar perfectamente recta (y/o simétrica); en la otra, si te fijas, la primera de la torres (especialmente esta) está curvada, por deformación de las lentes, a lo mejor puedo rectificarlo un poco. Puede que algo más de espacio por abajo hubiera estado bien también, pero en esta no es tan importante yo creo, por cómo rellenas el encuadre. Arreglando esos detalles, me parece que serían QI. En la de Montreal la composición es curiosa, aprovechando la forma del estadio para la diagonal, por un lado puede que guste y por otro puede que les parezca que te has acercado demasiado al borde, el típico "crop too tight". En la del Valle de la Muerte y en la de Abu Dhabi creo que la composición está un pelín centrada, pero bueno, ¡preséntalas y a ver! Kadellar (talk) 18:05, 11 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
¡He vuelto! De nada, ya te dije que no era problema, yo encantado, aunque me haga falta algo de tiempo. En el arco del Taj Mahal, había CA de color rojo en los bordes laterales del arco (y una línea minúscula en la cúpula, diminuta, diminuta), y algo de azul oscuro en la parte de arriba del arco, he subido "mi" versión. Mira a ver si te parece mejor, si no, revierte. Me he fijado mejor en la de la fuente y es verdad que parece imposible colocar todo perfectamente recto, será que el edificio no ha quedado tan recto con los años, no sé. En la de la distorsión, al colocar las torres rectas me obliga a recortar un poco de la base de la torre de la derecha. Subo esa versión en otro archivo para que la veas, si te gusta más podríamos pasarla al archivo original. Pero presenta la tuya tal y como está y a ver. Bueno, esto es todo por hoy jejeje. Un abrazo, Kadellar (talk) 20:46, 14 December 2011 (UTC) PD: Me olvidaba, utilizo Lightroom para las fotos, es muy fácil de utilizar. Tengo pendiente aprender a usar Photoshop, que tiene más funciones pero es más complicado.Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Francfort-Frankfurt Main8600.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments This photo is good showing the Frankfurt, Germany is one of the finicial districts rather than Berlin. It should be good! --Katarighe 19:22, 10 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Mezquita Sheikh Zayed-Abu Dhabi3493.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mezquita Sheikh Zayed-Abu Dhabi3493.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice detail, but I think it needs a slight rotation (talk page). Kadellar 19:43, 10 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
  Comment Agree, it was not 100% vertical, just uploaded an improved version --Poco a poco 20:03, 10 December 2011 (UTC) Alright now ;) Kadellar 20:08, 10 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Dubai_Creek-Dubai8861.JPG edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Dubai_Creek-Dubai8861.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 16:23, 13 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dunedin-Nueva Zelanda06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality for me! --Katarighe 19:55, 11 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument Valley-Utah2197.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I played with the image in NX2; noise reduction and some sharpening made a huge difference in the quality at 100%. Saffron Blaze 19:20, 10 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
  Comment I followed your advice and uploaded a new version of the file, --Poco a poco 22:38, 10 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
I see an unecessay colour chage and no improvement on the noise. If you don't mind I can upload the version I did and see what you think. Let me know if this is OK. Saffron Blaze 14:05, 11 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
  Done Just revert if it is not better, as caching issues are preventing me from seeing your update at this computer. Katarighe 19:55, 11 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! El Taj Mahal-Agra India0025.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, very nice --Taxiarchos228 07:56, 15 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Templo_dorado-Amritsar-India048.JPG edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo, ich habe mir das Bild nochmal genau angesehen und rechts von der Mitte, am oberen Rand noch drei Staubkörner entdeckt. Die hatte ich beim ersten mal übersehen. --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:55, 17 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Amber Fort-Jaipur-India0016.JPG edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo, ich hatte den Kommentar zum falschen Bild geschrieben, ich habe das jetzt korrigiert. Anscheinend hast du nach dem Geradedrehen den Rand der dabei entsteht nicht abgeschnitten. --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:26, 17 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Diwan-i-Khas-Fatehpur-Fatehpur Sikri India0017.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. I would crop the picture to have less sky, but nice anyway --Taxiarchos228 07:56, 15 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
  Comment I agree, just cropped the sky to improve it a bit more, thanks, --Poco a poco 18:50, 15 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Templo dorado-Amritsar-India095.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --Jebulon 11:19, 17 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City Palace-Jaipur-India0001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:50, 17 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fauna de Australia18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:06, 17 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Re. "Signature" edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. Yes, the signature washing, and IP another because other computer. Thanks. --Aleks G 23:45, 20 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Diwan-i-Khas-Fatehpur-Fatehpur Sikri India0022.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments This one needs a cut out, there are some white borders. --Berthold Werner 14:49, 17 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
You have a sharp eye, I didn't see that, just uploaded a fixed version --Poco a poco 16:57, 17 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Ok now. --Berthold Werner 12:52, 18 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Templo dorado-Amritsar-India048.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

File:Tumba_de_Akbar_el_Grande-Sikandra-India01.JPG, late answer edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Buenas tardes Poco a poco.

I'm sorry to be so late in answering.
I've re-checked the picture and indeed, it is far much better.
I was to re-nominate it, but it is not enough I'm afraid. I see still dustspots, the sky is very noisy, and the colors are a bit too much saturated/vivid.
In my opinion, it is due to your camera, which seems to be not good enough.
Maybe you could try to improve the overall quality by using a good software (I do use the freeware GIMP and I'm happy with that), and avoid taking pictures in too difficult light conditions (in my opinion, the Alhambra wall -I know the place, check my galleries !- and the inside of the dome of the Emirates hotel have no chances to be promoted, because of a lot of technical issues, especially noise due to the high ISO settings).
If you need more comments, or some specific help, please call me. I may be sometimes late in answering, but I'll try to do my best !
Keep going ! and "à bientôt peut-être".
Friendly, --Jebulon (talk) 17:34, 21 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
re-Ton français est très suffisant, j'ai tout compris ! Je comprends un peu l'espagnol, tu peux l'utiliser si tu veux.
En Pologne ? Tu es un grand voyageur !
Amitiés et feliz Navidad (je ne sais pas comment on dit en polonais !)--Jebulon (talk) 18:19, 21 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Complejo de Qutb-Delhi-India043.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 22:59, 19 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Madinat Jumeirah-Dubai3303.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The image composition is great!!! Some perspective distortion, which can probably be corrected with e.g. Hugin. --NorbertNagel 21:58, 12 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
  Comment Just updated a new version with an attempt to improve the perspective distortion, --Poco a poco 22:11, 13 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
I think, you did too much and uploaded a perspective-corrected version. please have a look. --NorbertNagel 21:34, 15 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Stimme dir zu, war etwas zu viel, deine Version ist gelungen, Danke! --Poco a poco 21:18, 16 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Quality to me now. --NorbertNagel 23:05, 19 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Temple en Inde edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Bonjour mon ami hispano-polonais.

J'ai annoté ton image...
Je suis désolé, j'espère ne pas te désespérer, mais je crois que cette photo ne passera pas la barre...
Cordialement,--Jebulon (talk) 10:40, 23 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Oui, c'est la méthode que j'utilise, et Non, je n'utilise pas de plug-in, je fais les choses muyyyyy doucement ! Mais quelquefois, j'isole (sélectionne) la zone avant.--Jebulon (talk) 10:47, 24 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Essaie pour voir ce que disent les autres (je resterai silencieux), mais je ne suis pas optimiste à cause du ciel...--Jebulon (talk) 14:10, 24 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Propuestas QI + Feliz Navidad edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

¡Hola! Siento no haberte comentado nada más sobre el resto de las fotos pero no he estado mucho por aquí... Yo si pudiera me compraría también un macro de esos jeje. En internet hay bastantes cosillas para aprender, yo a veces busco y en páginas como dzoom o xakatafoto hay consejos muy útiles para hacer mejores fotos. Si me necesitas para cualquier cosa... ya sabes dónde está mi página de "discusión". ¡Feliz Navidad! Kadellar (talk) 15:39, 24 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago6 comments5 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Washington Monument, Washington, D.C. USA3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI, no doubt for me.--Jebulon 17:45, 23 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Andrew Jackson monument, New Orleans, USA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:42, 23 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guanacos, Parque Nacional Torres del Paine, Chile5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments For me a QI--Holleday 18:34, 23 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spheniscus magellanicus, Seno Otway, Tierra de Fuego, Chile1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not perfect, but sufficient for QI, in my opinion.--Jebulon 17:47, 23 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flora de la Isla Sur-Nueva Zelanda03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Comment Good shot, but it would be better, if you crop it a little bit. --Haeferl 16:59, 20 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 08:51, 24 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Feliz Navidad edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hola Poco a poco. Quizá por este nuevo nombre no me conozcas... aunque si te digo "Dferg" quizás sí te acuerdes. Te ví editando en el café aquí y pasaba para desearte unas felices fiestas y un próspero año nuevo. Por la Wikipedia en español me verás poco pero sigo por meta y commons como siempre. Un abrazo. --Marco Aurelio (disputatio) 13:37, 26 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glaciar Perito Moreno24 - Argentina.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments --NorbertNagel 22:43, 24 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flora de la Isla Sur-Nueva Zelanda12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --Gidip 23:11, 24 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • ¡Hola! ¿Cómo vas? Aprovecho este aviso de QI para darte un consejo con la mejor intención para que te manden más mensajes de estos. No sé si lo haces intencionadamente o no, pero creo que deberías usar sensibilidades ISO más bajas en tus fotos (siempre que sea posible). Ayudaría a reducir el ruido y a mejorar la calidad. He visto unas cuantas a ISO 400 en las que personalmente creo que podrías haber utilizado 100 o, si no, 200. Aunque el tiempo de exposición fuera un poco más largo que a 400, seguiría suficientemente corto como para que nada saliera movido. Por si te sirve para el futuro y esos peazo de viajes ;) Un abrazo, Kadellar (talk) 18:17, 28 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento a los héroes de Iquique, Valparaíso, Chile1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The subject is nice, well depicted, and unusual, the composition is very good, but the extremely noisy sky ruins the picture IMO. I'm afraid there is nothing to do except by a better camera...--Jebulon 15:09, 25 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
  Support noise is acceptable for QI IMO, but I have improved it a bit --Taxiarchos228 21:02, 26 December 2011 (UTC).Reply
  Support Yes I agree, the improvement works very well IMO. Noise seems more acceptable, so I remove my opposition, and therefore there is no more "discuss", but "promote" as QI with two support votes.--Jebulon 02:12, 27 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Torrelapaja edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago4 comments1 person in discussion

¡Saca una foto del hospital de San Millán! Inútil de mi, no me di cuenta de que estaba enfrente de la iglesia y no saqué foto. Pero ni se te ocurra saca una foto de la iglesia ;P --ecelan (talk) 18:26, 30 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

¡Feliz Año Nuevo! y que el que viene sea como mínimo mejor que este --ecelan (talk) 18:36, 30 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
P.D. Hay artículo es:Casa de San Millán --ecelan (talk) 18:54, 30 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Estupendo, ya puedo dormir tranquilo ;) --ecelan (talk) 18:39, 31 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

QI posibles edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Que he echado otro ojo a las imágenes que me pasaste y hay dos que creo que podrían ser QI: esta y esta. La de la columna juraría que está torcida, habría que enderezarla si no está torcida en la realidad, y tiene algo de CA, por lo demás, si las presentas, yo mismo les doy el visto bueno. Saludos. Kadellar (talk) 22:34, 30 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Ok, me parece bien, así evitamos que parezca un chanchullo, aunque no lo sea. El corte de la columna sí lo he visto, no te creas, pero bueno, la nitidez de la foto a lo mejor lo salva, a ver qué pasa! ¡Feliz 2012! Kadellar (talk) 23:32, 30 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glaciar Grey, Parque Nacional Torres del Paine, Chile1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --Kadellar 17:59, 28 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Taj Mahal edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo Poco a poco, ich habe mal selbst eine Version von File:El Taj Mahal-Agra India0028.JPG hochgeladen. Dein Bild hatte nämlich meiner Meinung nach einen starken Gelbstich, deshalb mal eine Version mit blauem Himmel; müsste jetzt realistischer aussehen, oder? Viele Grüße --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 22:22, 31 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Complejo de Qutb-Delhi-India086.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 11:55, 31 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Templo dorado-Amritsar-India062.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me --Carschten 11:55, 31 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Poco_a_poco/2011&oldid=87368387"
Return to the user page of "Poco a poco/2011".