Qqerim

Image:Physico-Geographical_Regionalization_of_Poland.png

Witam.

Nazywam się Tomasz Kosior. Jestem studentem III roku studiów stacjonarnych w Wyższej Szkole Informatyki i Zarządzania w Bielsku-Białej.

Zwracam się z prośbą o udzielenie zgody na wykorzystanie nazw geograficznych wykorzystywanych na mapach: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7c/Physico-Geographical_Regionalization_of_Poland.png oraz jeżeli jest możliwość to różnież prosze o zgodę na użycie map celem wykorzystani ich w pracy dyplomowej: "System informacyjny szlaków górskich" w formie edukacyjnego serwisu internetowego. Serwis ten jest tworzony z myślą o turystach spędzających aktywnie czas w górach. Po obronieniu pracy dyplomowej zamierzam dalej kontynuować pracę nad unowocześnieniem serwisu oraz stworzeniem dodatkowych poddziałów. Wiele schronisk oraz obiektów znajdujących się na szlakach górskich jest zainteresowanych kontynuowaniem współpracy w tworzeniu tego serwisu internetowego.

W przypadku pozytywnego rozpatrzenia mojej prośby proszę o przesłanie na adres e-mail: tomasz.kosior.007@wp.pl zgody na wykorzystanie danych oraz innych materiałów zawartych na w/w stronie internetowej.

Za pozytywne rozpatrzenie mojej prośby z góry dziękuję.

Tomasz Kosior

Image:Herb glogow.jpg

You should check to see whether a better version already exists... AnonMoos 13:26, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

herby

Proszę cie nie ładuj na commons herbów!! Załaduj je lokalnie na pl.wiki.

Pozdrawiam --WarX 09:17, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Apt Civ Unus.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Apt Civ Unus.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Gizmo II 21:53, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

herby

Ostatni raz proszę o nie ładowanie polskich herbów na Commons!.

--WarX 20:03, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Bo celem jest przerysowanie ich do SVG, a z pl.wiki się po prostu o wiele szybciej kasuje :)

Pozdrawiam --WarX 10:56, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Gmina Prostki.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Gmina Prostki.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Balloonguy 21:17, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Municipalities in Poland deprived of town privileges.png

Bardzo interesująca mapa. Popraw w niej jeden mały drobiazg: w legendzie mapy po lewej na dole "ucięło" Ci czwarty wyraz: jest "mi" powinno być "miasto". Pozdrawiam Julo 18:21, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

mezoregiony fizycznogeograficzne

Hej! Bardzo fajny pomysł z tymi mapami, tylko mała uwaga techniczna - warto by było przypisać do nich kategorie. Leinad 14:14, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Myślę, że należałoby stworzyć nowe podkategorie w ramach kategorii Category:Maps of Poland - a jak dalej to podzielić to chyba Ty jesteś obeznany najlepiej :)) IMHO O ile dobrze widzę, to stworzyłeś mapy makroregionów i mezoregionów, tak więc wydaje mi się że właściwy podział na kategorie to Category:Maps of Poland => Category:Macroregions of Poland => utworzenie poszczególnych kategorii z nazwami makroregionów i przypisanie do nich odpowiednich map. Leinad 14:43, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:513.61 Pogórze Rożnowskie.png

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:08, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Regionalizacja fizycznogeograficzna

Dzięki wielkie za całą serię map ;-) Muszę przyznać, że bardzo mi się przydały do szkoły - dostaliśmy nazwy krain geograficznych i mieliśmy się nauczyć co gdzie jest, z Twoimi mapami to czysta przyjemność! Pozdrawiam --Entereczek (talk) 17:08, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Witam serdecznie. Jestem w trakcie pisania pracy dyplomowej, chciałabym wykorzystać serię map zamieszczonych w Wikimedii z uwzględnieniem praw autorskich, jednak potrzebne jest pełnobrzmiące nazwisko i imię autora.Przydałaby się i data powstania tych map. Proszę o kontakt : sadbozena@interia.eu

Witam, Pragnę poinformować autora mapy, że wydawnictwo kartograficzne Beata Piętka użyło mapy "Regionalizacja fizycznogeograficzna Polski" w Atlasie Polska - encyklopedia geograficzno - drogowa. W atlasie podany został link do mapy, ale brak jest nazwiska autora mapy. Mam nadzieję, że wydawnictwo kontaktowało się z autorem.

Jeżeli autor życzy sobie zobaczyć zdjęcia atlasu - proszę pisać marcinszwagrzyk@op.pl

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Qqerim!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:13, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Wyżyna Śląska.png is uncategorized since 3 May 2009.
• Image:Dolina Dolnej Wisły.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.

File:Municipalities in Poland deprived of town privileges.png

Zgłoszono dwa błędy [1][2] na tej ilustracji. Przeczytaj i może popraw? Pozdr. Mulat (talk) 10:18, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Witam, w artykule, którego ilustracją jest niniejsza mapa, zgłosiłem szereg błędów dotyczących województwa pomorskiego. O ile jednak hasła będę sam powoli poprawiał, to co do garfiki konieczna jest Pańska edycja. Sądzę, że jest to ważne, gdyż artykuły i grafiki "na medal" polskiej Wikipedii są szczególnie często wykorzystywane, a tymczasem tu na 6 miast województwa pomorskiego są 4 błędy.

Przekleję tu to, co wpisałem w dyskusji hasła:

Informację o prawach miejskich Gorzędzieja podaje polska Wiki, oczywiście bez podania źródła, bo po co. Tymczasem Gorzędziej miał nie prawo miejskie, a prawo założenia targu - to dwie różne rzeczy (Historia Pomorza I 1, s. 507).

Goręczyn nigdy nie miał praw miejskich - epizodycznie był być może ośrodkiem kasztelanii, ale ostatnio nawet to jest kwestionowane, w każdym razie nie był na pewno nawet grodem (M. Dzięcielski, Dzieje Ziemi Mirachowskiej).

Brakuje za to:

- Łupawy, która otrzymała prawa miejskie od swojego właściciela, brandenburskiego generalnego komisarza wojennego Joachima v. Grumbkowa w roku 1689. Nie wiadomo, kiedy utraciła prawa miejskie. Historia Pomorza II 3 s. 736 podaje, że Łupawa "nie rozwinęła się do rzędu miast", więc wychodzi na to, że przywilej pozostał niezrealizowany, ale z drugiej strony przedwojenne Messtichblatty wyraźnie pokazują zarys ryneczku (na upartego jeszcze dziś da się go dostrzec), więc chyba przez parę lat to jako miasto funkcjonowało.

- Chełma, czyli pruskiego "Miasta Kombinowanego", czyli "Królewsko-Pruskiego Bezpośredniego Miasta Chełma", złożonego z Chełma, Siedlec i Starych Szkotów, czyli terenów podgdańskich zajętych przez Prusy po I rozbiorze, po to, by zrobić konkurencję wiernemu Rzptej Gdańskowi. Prawa miejskie miało 1772-1814 (Historia Gdańska III 1 s. 591).

- Zastanawiałbym się też nad gdańskim Osiekiem. Wprawdzie formalnie praw miejskich chyba nie miał, a w każdym razie nie zachował się przywilej, ale miał jakieś elementy samorządu miejskiego - w księgach kamlarii Starego Miasta z końca XV w. wielokrotnie są wzmianki o budowie "Polnisches Rathaus" właśnie w Osieku. Ale jeśli przyjmujemy prawa miejskie za wyznacznik, to chyba jednak nie - skoro wspomniane wzmianki są właśnie w księdze Starego Miasta, a nie osobnej Osieka (wynika z tego, że Osiek nie miał odrębności finansowej).

Tomasz Larczyński

File:Map_of_Poland_showing_coats_of_arms_of_counties.png

File:Map_of_Poland_showing_coats_of_arms_of_counties.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

85.225.50.158 16:14, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:BIA Cyryn COA.png

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:BIA Cyryn COA.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 13:46, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:BIA Malecz COA.png

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:BIA Malecz COA.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 13:46, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:UKR Magierów COA.png

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:UKR Magierów COA.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 12:52, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:UKR Cholojow 1870 COA.png

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:UKR Cholojow 1870 COA.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 12:53, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

File:842.82_Pojezierze_Mrągowskie.png

File:842.82_Pojezierze_Mrągowskie.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

31.60.181.72 09:05, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Featured Picture Nomination

The image File:Physico-Geographical Regionalization of Poland.png, which was produced or uploaded by you, has been nominated for featured picture status at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Physico-Geographical Regionalization of Poland.png. Good luck! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 19:41, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Możliwy błąd na nominowanym obrazku

Cześć, gratuluję ekspozycji //commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Municipalities_in_Poland_deprived_of_town_privileges.png na głównej plwiki!

…ale chyba zauważyłem błąd. pl:Gawłuszowice są u Ciebie oznaczone jako niegdysiejsze miasto, skąd taka informacja? Faktycznie, kiedyś tak można było na plwiki przeczytać, ale z braku źródeł już tego nie ma. Pozdrawiam, Skalee (talk) 17:13, 22 November 2012 (UTC).

File: Physico-Geographical Regionalization of Poland.png

Na południe od Beskidu Makowskiego i Kotliny Rabczańskiej jest nieopisany obszar. Prawdopodobnie ma to być: Pasmo Babiogórskie lub Beskid Orawsko-Podhalański. Jeśli ilustracja ma być „na medal”, to koniecznie trzeba ją poprawić. --Wojciech Słota (talk) 11:56, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

file:Municipalities in Poland deprived of town privileges.png

Zaznaczone na mapie Kołaczyce (woj podkarpackie, powiat jasielski) straciły prawa miejskie po czym niedawno powtórnie odzyskały, brakuje tam wsi Rożnowice (woj. małopolskie, powiat gorlicki,), która podobnie jak Szymbark, była miastem niemieckim, po czym bodajże w XVII wieku prawa miejskie utraciła

File:POL powiat bielski (podlaski) COA.jpg

File:POL powiat bielski (podlaski) COA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

jdx ^Re: 01:19, 11 March 2016 (UTC)