Open main menu

User talk:Racconish

Contents

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, BrightRaven (talk) 07:43, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Clair de Lune Espagnol (1909).webmEdit

 
File:Clair de Lune Espagnol (1909).webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 07:49, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

About File:2008TIBE Day4 Hall1 ChinaTimesPublishing DennisNieh.jpgEdit

I'm the ONLY photographer of this photo and fixed the original image.

Why not suitable for Commons although I take this photo by myself ten years ago in TWTC?

And I also fixed this image to suit with Commons' Policy.

Should I make a request from the PR of CTimes? Rico Shen contact... 21:07, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

My bad. — Racconish💬 07:49, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Pearsall Smith Family.jpgEdit

Hi, Racconish, the question is: who's who in this image? Can you help? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 08:54, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Lotje :   Done   — Racconish💬 09:14, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Opinion?Edit

Hi, Racconish, as you have been involved in the review of various Hannah Arendt photos, may I ask what is your expert opinion of this Flickr photo. It appears to be licensed with CC BY 2.0, and the photo appears on various other sites stating the same author and licence. Would that be OK to upload in Commons, or do you think it is nonetheless questionable? Antilope (talk) 15:56, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Antilope, the photo is on Getty' image bank with credits to the Bettmann Archive, with a mention of 1963. [1] This might indicate it comes from a press agency. — Racconish💬 17:20, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Well, as far as I can see, that's a clearly a different photo, albeit most likely taken at the same occasion. But I guess you mean that it does raise doubts about the authorship. Antilope (talk) 18:43, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Yes, that's exactly right. — Racconish💬 19:04, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Racconish".