User talk:Tournasol7/Archive20

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Outside view of Wartburg Castle (4).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Outside view of Wartburg Castle (4).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arenes de Nimes (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:37, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arenes de Nimes (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arenes de Nimes (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arenes de Nimes (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stained-glass window of the Cathedral of Nimes (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port de Rives in Thonon-les-Bains 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 12:55, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euphorbia polychroma in Jardin des 5 sens (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! River Kwai bridge (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:26, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Charvonnex 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:24, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arenes de Nimes (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:03, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arenes de Nimes (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:01, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte Neuve in Vezelay (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:36, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jayatataka Baray (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:36, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windmill of the Redounel in La Couvertoirade (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:36, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Nevers 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:34, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Markt 4 in Alsfeld.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:34, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Archbishops Palace in Narbonne 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tesla Delacroix 11:53, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Nevers 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fischer.H 10:48, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hopital de la Charite in Dole 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fischer.H 10:48, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sacred Heart basilica in Paray-le-M 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 12:11, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exterior of the Cathedral of Nimes (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exterior of the Cathedral of Nimes (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exterior of the Cathedral of Nimes (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exterior of the Cathedral of Nimes (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Troistorrents 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Epilobium angustifolium at Lac de Morgins (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Farel 1 in Aigle (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain of the Esplanade in Nimes (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 15:02, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain of the Esplanade in Nimes (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 15:02, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain of the Esplanade in Nimes (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 15:04, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain of the Esplanade in Nimes (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 15:04, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Lacroix-Barrez (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:59, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Roch church in Montezic (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mu Ko Lanta NP (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ducal Museum in Gotha 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Genevieve church in Sainte-Genevieve-sur-Argence (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:19, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belvedere de Trechauffe 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tesla Delacroix 20:15, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eupatorium cannabinum in ZP Mont de Grange (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 19:18, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Solanum aviculare in Abel Tasman NP (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:38, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison Carree in Nimes (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:41, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison Carree in Nimes (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:42, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison Carree in Nimes (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:45, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison Carree in Nimes (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:46, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain of the Esplanade in Nimes (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:52, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison Carree in Nimes (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality and nice object --LexKurochkin 18:50, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Vedard church in Coubisou 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:59, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Aigueperse 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:59, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple of Divus Augustus in Rome (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:13, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Preah Khan temple (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Peyreleau 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments For me a bit too bright. Could you add some contrast / blacks? --Tuxyso 18:39, 8 February 2021 (UTC)  New version uploaded, Tournasol7 21:57, 14 February 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:59, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour Magne in Nimes (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 02:16, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour Magne in Nimes (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:45, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour Magne in Nimes (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:45, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ramparts of La Couvertoirade 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:09, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ko Phi Phi Don (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 16:18, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ducal Palace in Nevers 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:52, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Paul cathedral in Muenster 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:52, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Gy 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:09, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain of the Esplanade in Nimes (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:15, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain of the Esplanade in Nimes (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:15, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Le Pertuis (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The distracting foreground should be cropped out IMO --Ermell 15:49, 15 February 2021 (UTC)  New version uploaded, Tournasol7 14:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:49, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pointe de Nantaux 05.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pointe de Nantaux 05.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestant city church in Bad Hersfeld (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Michael Priory of Grandmont (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte de la Pique in Najac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:10, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lighthouse in Mu Ko Lanta NP (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 11:35, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Onet-le-Chateau (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Liridon 14:16, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Dave in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de l'Isle in Annecy 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:18, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Vezins-de-Levezou (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 54 Place du Faubourg in Najac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:47, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Onet-le-Chateau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 6 Rue Gaston Maruejols in Nimes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loh Dalum beach (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:41, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Western facade of the Saint Andrew Bobola church in Świecie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope of many pictures. Used. -- Jim Evans (talk) 13:09, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:07, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
South-eastern exposure of the Saint Andrew Bobola church in Świecie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope of many pictures. Used. Very nice --Jim Evans (talk) 13:21, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:06, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Perpetua and Felicitas church in Nimes 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 02:43, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Perpetua and Felicitas church in Nimes 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 01:40, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fortified Church of Inieres (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 12:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angkor Wat 112.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 12:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Our Lady of Rodez 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 12:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Milliarede in Nimes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:28, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Perpetua and Felicitas church in Nimes 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 12:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Perpetua and Felicitas church in Nimes 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 12:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exterior of the Cathedral of Nimes (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 15:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour Magne in Nimes (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not the easiest photo to correct the verticals, quality is good --Michielverbeek 04:47, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Paul church in Nimes 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 01:05, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Paul church in Nimes 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 01:04, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town Hall of Wittstock Dosse (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:13, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 45 Place du Faubourg in Najac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 06:09, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arcades at Place des Arcades in Sauveterre-de-R 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 06:09, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! National horse stud farm in Rodez 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 06:10, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 27 Rue Droite in Rieupeyroux 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:13, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Perpetua and Felicitas church in Nimes 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Perpetua and Felicitas church in Nimes 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:14, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Perpetua and Felicitas church in Nimes 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Am Treppchen 1 in Bad Hersfeld.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Slightly too bright IMO. --Ermell 07:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martial church in Rieupeyroux (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panoramic view of Rome from Belvedere dei Salviati 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me --PantheraLeo1359531 14:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Our Lady of Rodez 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 13:21, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Paul church in Nimes 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Might be me, but looks like there's some halo around the building's top edge. --Perryprog 05:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Paul church in Nimes 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 04:05, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Paul church in Nimes 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:07, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Jerome church in La Capelle-Bleys 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:37, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rinnentorturm in Bensheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:37, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison d'Armagnac in Rodez 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of La Fouillade 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 44 Place du Faubourg in Najac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:37, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16 rue Fresque in Nimes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:58, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 5 Rue du Bourguet in Najac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 18:24, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 24 Place des Arcades in Sauveterre-de-R 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 11:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardea cinerea in Aveyron 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:28, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 19 Rue Droite in Rieupeyroux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 10:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 42 in Bensheim (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me --PantheraLeo1359531 16:53, 23 February 2021 (UTC)~

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of the train station in Najac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too bright IMO --Ermell 19:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)  New version uploaded, Tournasol7 10:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:57, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Milliarede in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please check the image. IMO it's unsharp or blurred at the top and there are halos too. --XRay 07:35, 18 February 2021 (UTC)  New version uploaded, Tournasol7 10:00, 23 February 2021 (UTC)  Support Thank you. IMO OK now. :-) --XRay 10:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain of the Esplanade in Nimes (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 20:13, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall of Gotha (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:15, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former bishopric in Rodez 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:44, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 25 Rue du Bourguet in Najac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:23, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Saint-Martin-de-Cormieres 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:24, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Novi de Caveirac in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 08:12, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 27 rue de l'Aspic in Nimes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 08:14, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lupinus polyphyllus in Canterbury Region 07.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lupinus polyphyllus in Canterbury Region 07.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Murier d'Espagne in Nimes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 16:32, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Littre in Nimes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 16:27, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mainzer Gasse 6 in Alsfeld (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:42, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Pegairolles-de-l'Escalette 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:12, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Haute Alphonse de Poitiers in Najac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:13, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Our Lady of Rodez 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:12, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Soubes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:15, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kampong Phlouk (32).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 00:30, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Michael Priory of Grandmont (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:13, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Districts Cardaillac and Layoule in Rodez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:13, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue du Barriou in Najac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:04, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Vezins-de-Levezou (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for me. But can the twig at the top right also be removed?--Famberhorst 06:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. But please clone out the unsharp branch top right. --XRay 06:04, 26 February 2021 (UTC)  Support Done. --Tournasol7 20:59, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Onet-le-Chateau (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:58, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petit Temple des Ursulines in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:02, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petit Temple des Ursulines in Nimes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:02, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16 Rue de l'Horloge in Nimes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:02, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de Bernis in Nimes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:00, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Bernis in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:00, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de l'Agau in Nimes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 14:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de Justice in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 20:30, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place de l'Horloge in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 03:40, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Meynier de Salinelles in Nimes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Geoprofi Lars 17:46, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Meynier de Salinelles in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Geoprofi Lars 17:46, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche in Bad Hersfeld (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:18, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martial church in Rieupeyroux (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:58, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison de Guitard in Rodez 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:00, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20 Place du Faubourg in Najac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:01, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour Magne in Nimes (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Geoprofi Lars 18:25, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City hall in Nimes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please check your image - the verticals. IMO it's tilted CCW. --XRay 04:58, 24 February 2021 (UTC) Sorry, but it looks good for me. --Tournasol7 13:34, 25 February 2021 (UTC) I added notes. --XRay 08:58, 26 February 2021 (UTC)  New version uploaded, but it's not easy found the verticals. Tournasol7 21:06, 26 February 2021 (UTC)  Support Thank you. You're right, sometimes it's really difficult to find the verticals - especially at older buildings. --XRay 07:11, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Am Markt 11 in Bad Hersfeld.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:15, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martial church in Rieupeyroux (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:14, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Seguy in Rodez 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:05, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 40 Place du Faubourg in Najac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:15, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 3 Plan de l'Aspic in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 06:41, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison des Atlantes in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 06:42, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour Magne in Nimes (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 06:43, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison des Atlantes in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 06:44, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Bernis in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander Novikov 20:34, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Antoninus Pius in Nimes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:11, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of the Assumption in Boussac 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Town hall tower in Znin (2).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Town hall tower in Znin (2).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main portal of the Saint Paul church in Nîmes.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:52, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Frontal facade of the Bücking-Haus in Alsfeld.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope I might crop about half of the cobblestones -- Jim Evans (talk) 19:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 17 Grand Rue in Nimes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:43, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 4 Rue Doree in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 12:29, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Blaise church in Meljac 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:51, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Naucelle 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:50, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Assumption of Our Lady in Centres 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:51, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour du Portalet de cotes in Lodeve 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:29, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moat in Sauveterre-de-Rouergue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:58, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Flavin (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:08, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Flavin (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exterior of the Castle of Valencay 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portal of the building of the Lawyers of the poor in Nîmes.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Taurines 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. I love these little châteaux – thank you for documenting them! --Aristeas 19:21, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Blaise church in Meljac 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:17, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Naucelle 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:00, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison de Cusson in Lodeve.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 13:34, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building at Allee Laperouse in Sauveterre-de-Rouergue 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 13:36, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Brueys in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de l'Academie in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de l'Academie in Nimes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 14:08, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Paul church in Nimes 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:50, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clock tower of Lycee Alphonse-Daudet in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:50, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de Justice in Nimes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 15:19, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musee d'Histoire naturelle in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 15:37, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Regis in Nimes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 15:40, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Le Bosc 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:07, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Nativity of Saint John the Baptist in Pegairolles-de-l'Escalette 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:07, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place de l'Horloge in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 18:55, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Novi de Caveirac in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:06, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Dole (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:28, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20 rue Traversiere-du-Murot in Toul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praia do Castelo do Queijo (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:34, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13 rue des Belles-Lunettes in Nevers (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:16, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont de Valmale 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:35, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 5 Place Champollion in Figeac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:56, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Albouy in Lodeve 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petit Temple des Ursulines in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Southern exposure of the Rinnentorturm in Bensheim.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:35, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment I like the inclusion of the lamp-post as this shows that the building is not vertical. Martinvl (talk) 22:15, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Southern facade of the Town hall of La Fouillade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 17 rue des Marchands in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but would suggest tighter crop on the right --PantheraLeo1359531 17:46, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour Magne in Nimes (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander Novikov 09:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour Magne in Nimes (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me --PantheraLeo1359531 17:52, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of St-Christophe-sur-Dolaison (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:45, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in St-Amans-de-Vares 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:11, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Saugues (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:56, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pomorska 1 in Zagan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:44, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady of Assumption church in Lapanouse 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality and I like the photo, thanks! --LexKurochkin 07:20, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musee d'Histoire naturelle in Nimes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:06, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de la Collegiale in Sauveterre-de-R.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 06:47, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Clare church in Meyrieu-les-Etangs (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:27, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of the La Batie castle in Vienne (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:27, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of St-Christophe-sur-Dolaison (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --RockyMasum 07:18, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in St-Amans-de-Vares 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 08:25, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John church in St-Jean-de-Bournay (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 10:00, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Villard in Nimes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 12:50, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 17 rue des Marchands in Nimes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 08:50, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Maurice church in Arcisse 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:48, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Saint-Savin Isere (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:46, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhone River near La Balme 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:01, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Symphorian church in La Batie-Montgascon 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:45, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 18 rue Lamartine in Belley.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:02, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 17 Rue du Chapitre in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:32, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 17 Rue du Chapitre in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:32, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place de l'Horloge in Nimes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thanks --Moroder 16:23, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 17 rue des Marchands in Nimes 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, interesting image :) --PantheraLeo1359531 15:34, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2 rue des Marchands in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 15:38, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former bishop's palace in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 17:58, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Louis church in Luzinay 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --PantheraLeo1359531 15:31, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Vaulx-Milieu (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 06:51, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Maurice church in Villette-de-Vienne 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 06:48, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 17 rue des Marchands in Nimes 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Photo détaillée de bonne qualité. --SyB~Anicium 16:24, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 4 Rue Doree in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 06:37, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portal of the Hôtel de l'Académie in Nîmes.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:03, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clock tower of Lycée Alphonse-Daudet in Nîmes.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:03, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former bishop's palace in Nimes 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 14:26, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochbruecktorstrasse 5 in Rottweil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:42, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hofgarten in Oehringen 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:50, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martin-Luther-Platz 32 in Ansbach (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:44, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz in Lauf an der Pegnitz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:50, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poststrasse 3 in Kirchberg an der Jagst (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:45, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former bishop's palace in Nimes 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:11, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1 Rue des Petits Souliers in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:11, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour Magne in Nimes (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:11, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rouleau de Bostan 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:06, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former bishop's palace in Nimes 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 19:14, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former bishop's palace in Nimes 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me --PantheraLeo1359531 14:57, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former bishop's palace in Nimes 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me --PantheraLeo1359531 15:11, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 17 rue des Marchands in Nimes 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me --PantheraLeo1359531 15:00, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue du Chapitre in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 11:25, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Louis church in Luzinay 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:44, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Hippolytus church in Chuzelles 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:44, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz 4 in Lauf an der Pegnitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Le Pertuis (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Maurice church in Villette-de-Vienne 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A little bit too dark. --XRay 05:48, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Hippolytus church in Chuzelles 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 06:35, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 17 rue des Marchands in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:46, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Presbytere de la cathedrale in Nimes 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2 Rue Cremieux in Nimes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 22:19, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand Temple des Dominicains in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand Temple des Dominicains in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Av. dos Combatentes da Grande Guerra 24 in Viana do Castelo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:29, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City walls of La Cavalerie 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:10, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Roch church in Albinhac 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:10, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valon Castle in Lacroix-Barrez 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:10, 12 March 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 08:49, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Matthew church in Laguiole 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:10, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Post office in La Chapelle-d'Abondance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:50, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sixt abbey 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:50, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand Temple des Dominicains in Nimes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 16:31, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand Temple des Dominicains in Nimes 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 20:31, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand Temple des Dominicains in Nimes 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, good one --PantheraLeo1359531 16:29, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand Temple des Dominicains in Nimes 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 16:30, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Annecy 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:37, 13 March 2021 (UTC)  Support I like it --Mike1979 Russia 07:22, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de l'Isle in Annecy 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Francis church in Annecy 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter cathedral in Annecy 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former Episcopal Palace of Annecy 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:37, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter church in Curieres 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Villecomtal 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady of Mt Provent chapel in Chatillon 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nativity of the Virgin Mary church in Les Gets 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:03, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Maurice church in Marignier 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:03, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martin-Luther-Platz 32 in Ansbach (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 10:44, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Vallon 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:07, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church in Salgues 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:46, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Path in FD de la Roquette-Bonneval 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Unusual composition, but the quality is fine. Actually I like it. Thanks. --LexKurochkin 14:49, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Nasbinals 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:05, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Rivet in Nimes 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me --PantheraLeo1359531 15:45, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2 Place aux Herbes in Nimes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:00, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15 Grand Rue in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:54, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15 Grand Rue in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Radomianin 17:38, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15 Grand Rue in Nimes 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:18, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alchemilla alpina in Jardin des 5 sens (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:35, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Lapanouse (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:47, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Saugues (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:48, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angkor Wat 069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:59, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Magdalene church in Lunel (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:44, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape in Chablais valaisan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:03, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle de l'Essert in Chatel 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:03, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 11 rue des Marchands in Nimes 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:11, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2 rue des Marchands in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:11, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Souls Chapel in Viana do Castelo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:08, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cavado River in Barcelos (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The buildings are disappointing but the photo is beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek 07:38, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa da Azenha in Barcelos (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:59, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Barcelos (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support i like it --Mike1979 Russia 07:08, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2 Place aux Herbes in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:56, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Presbytere de la cathedrale in Nimes 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Presbytere de la cathedrale in Nimes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Baudilus church in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 23:01, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Melgaco 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:50, 18 March 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Túllio F 08:54, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Baudilus church in Nimes 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality! --Radomianin 23:04, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Baudilus church in Nimes 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A little more tone correction would be appropriate. Nevertheless, good quality! --Radomianin 23:07, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Baudilus church in Nimes 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality! --Radomianin 23:08, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Baudilus church in Nimes 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality! --Radomianin 23:12, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Areosa fortress 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:14, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Dominic church in Viana do Castelo 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:21, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady of Agony church in Viana do Castelo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:21, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Perpetua and Felicitas church in Nimes 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 22:41, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady of Peneda sanctuary 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 22:41, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 7 Place Gabriel Peri in Nimes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 19:17, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Baudilus church in Nimes 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 23:22, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Baudilus church in Nimes 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, the water of the fountain at the bottom of the image is not disturbing. --Radomianin 00:08, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady of Agony church in Viana do Castelo 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:32, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Viana do Castelo 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander Novikov 07:57, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cao fortress in Caminha 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:02, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Areosa fortress 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:24, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forte de Paco 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:24, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Baudilus church in Nimes 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 11:57, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Baudilus church in Nimes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me --PantheraLeo1359531 19:52, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison Podevigne de Grandval in St-Urcize 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality. --F. Riedelio 10:05, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand Temple des Dominicains in Nimes 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality. --F. Riedelio 09:53, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avenida dos Aliados in Porto (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I would suggest a tighter crop (see image notes) --Tuxyso 07:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)  Support I agree about the crop. Nevertheless, I think it is still a quality image. --Ximonic 08:24, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cafe Guarany in Porto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I like it --Mike1979 Russia 08:22, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cao fortress in Caminha 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:19, 21 March 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:20, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Areosa fortress 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:51, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Misericordia church in Porto (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 08:27, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Granaries in Soajo 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:22, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady of Agony church in Viana do Castelo 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Need vertical correction on the left --Wilfredor 22:41, 19 March 2021 (UTC)  New version uploaded, Tournasol7 16:26, 20 March 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 00:06, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Cross convent in Viana do Castelo 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overall sharpness and contrast could be better, I would suggest some post-processing. IMHO still QI. --Tuxyso 14:44, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montedor lighthouse in Montedor (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 14:48, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polytechnic Institute of Viana do Castelo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:14, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Souls Chapel in Viana do Castelo 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 14:47, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte d'Auguste in Nimes 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 09:21, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte d'Auguste in Nimes 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 19:03, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue des Orangers in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 19:03, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Baudilus church in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Soft lighting and most of the building is sharp. --Lion-hearted85 22:48, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour Magne in Nimes (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO the photo should be cropped to remove unwanted outer parts: too much foreground and disturbing trees on the left and right side. --F. Riedelio 13:00, 19 March 2021 (UTC) Sorry, here I use the third rule. And the trees optically limit the space. It's not candidat for FP, just for QI. --Tournasol7 16:39, 21 March 2021 (UTC)  Support The photo is very sharp, and the lighting is soft. The framing showing the surroundings of the building also looks good to me.--Lion-hearted85 22:26, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 21 rue des Orangers in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 23:48, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13 Rue des Lombards in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 23:48, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13 Rue des Lombards in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 23:48, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13 Rue des Lombards in Nimes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 23:48, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praia de Moledo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:58, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praia do Forte do Cao (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:33, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marinheiro windmill in Montedor 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:56, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady of Peneda sanctuary 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:55, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Perpetua and Felicitas church in Nimes 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 15:18, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Castro Laboreiro 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 22:57, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 13 Rue des Lombards in Nimes 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 20:23, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 3 rue du Murier-d'Espagne in Nimes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 20:26, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour Magne in Nimes (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 20:26, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 3 rue du Murier-d'Espagne in Nimes 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 20:26, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape in Morzine 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I like it --Mike1979 Russia 12:04, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loh Dalum beach (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:29, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Tavaneuse 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:29, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gentiana lutea at Lac de Roy (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:27, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 6B Rue des Halles in Nimes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 22:37, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 11 rue de la Ferrage in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 22:31, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedrichstrasse 7 in Bayreuth (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:28, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Markt 2 in Wildenfels (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:29, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte d'Auguste in Nimes 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 23:49, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15 Grand Rue in Nimes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Charles church in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 18:35, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 7 boulevard Gambetta in Nimes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:01, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angkor Wat 099.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:38, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maximilianstrasse 57 in Bayreuth (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 08:15, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Markt 2 in Wildenfels (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 07:26, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziegenbalgplatz 6 in Pulsnitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit much uninteresting foreground but o.k. --Ermell 07:47, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Markt 10 in Kamenz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:48, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Balincourt in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality. --F. Riedelio 14:08, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Balincourt in Nimes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality. --F. Riedelio 14:10, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 18 rue des Lombards in Nimes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:16, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Andrew church in Barcelinhos 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dust spot at top-left (see image note), else nice. --Aristeas 11:14, 22 March 2021 (UTC)  New version uploaded, Tournasol7 08:39, 23 March 2021 (UTC)  Support Thank you very much! --Aristeas 10:04, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Baudilus church in Nimes 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly too dark imho, could you brighten a bit? --Tuxyso 01:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)  New version uploaded, Tournasol7 08:40, 23 March 2021 (UTC) IMHO QI now. --Tuxyso 13:44, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Baudilus church in Nimes 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly too dark imho, could you brighten a bit? --Tuxyso 01:27, 21 March 2021 (UTC)  New version uploaded, Tournasol7 08:40, 23 March 2021 (UTC) IMHO QI now. --Tuxyso 13:44, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Roch church in Castaillac (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:44, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mu Ko Lanta NP (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:30, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bazyliszek fountain in Zary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:49, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Julius-Kuehn-Pl 3 in Pulsnitz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:40, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Markt 4 in Kamenz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:49, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Rulman in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 12:54, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte d'Auguste in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:20, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Julius-Kuehn-Pl 1 in Pulsnitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:57, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martial church in Arnac-la-Poste 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 12:52, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rynek 18 in Zary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:57, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andreasbrunnen in Kamenz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 23:50, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loh Dalum beach (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 18:26, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 14 place de Salmbach in Les Grands-Chezeaux (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 06:50, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Mailhac-sur-Benaize (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 06:50, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! River Kwai bridge (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 06:50, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Saint-Leger-Magnazeix (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 06:50, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel de Lagorce in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 21:14, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel de Lagorce in Nimes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 21:31, 30 March 2021 (UTC)(UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac de Vallon 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 10:29, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Les Grands-Chezeaux 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:07, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kampong Phlouk (28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:07, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dranse de Montriond 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:56, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Viana do Castelo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Code issues in User:Tournasol7/common.js

Hi Tournasol7, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:Tournasol7/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. ISSUE: line 1 character 42: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: importScript('User:Wilfredor/QICvote.js')

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 15:32, 2 April 2021 (UTC).

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Primula cultivar in Jardins de la Fontaine in Nimes 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 20:52, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Golinhac 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:09, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Cromac (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 06:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Leodegar church in St-Leger-Magnazeix 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 07:14, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Roch church in Castaillac (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 07:50, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Stephane Mallarme in Nimes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:15, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel de Lagorce in Nimes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 09:39, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castellum Divisorium in Nimes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 09:40, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 28 boulevard Gambetta in Nimes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some CA in the branches should be removed. --Ermell 20:34, 29 March 2021 (UTC)  New version uploaded, Tournasol7 13:13, 30 March 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:24, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Tete du Vuargne (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question Is it a panorama? If it is, please desribe it as a panorama. --LexKurochkin 13:16, 25 March 2021 (UTC)  Done, Tournasol7 06:00, 31 March 2021 (UTC)  Support Thanks! Good quality, nice place. --LexKurochkin 15:49, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gentiana clusii at Lac de Tavaneuse (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good Quality. --F. Riedelio 09:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 April 2021 (UTC)