User talk:Trougnouf/Archive 2018 1

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pink human cutting off branches in Auderghem, Belgium (DSCF2356).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:37, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larry the cat standing on gravel and gently pulling on a wool string in Auderghem, Belgium (DSCF2328).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 15:12, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larry the cat standing on grass and licking his nose in Auderghem, Belgium (DSCF2372).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 15:12, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue François Bekaert photographed from East to West on a foggy December late afternoon (Auderghem, Belgium).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good categorisation, IMO. Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:39, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Intersection of Fairfax Forest Reserve Rd E (Carbon River Rd) and NF-7810 (Cayada Creek Road) looking North over the Carbon River in Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest, WA (DSC 0596).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:24, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castilleja with Summit lake in the background, Clearwater Wilderness, WA (DSC 0577).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --HalfGig 21:27, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larry the cat standing on gravel and verociously attacking a wool string in Auderghem, Belgium (DSCF2327).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:41, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acro standing lap dance variation (DSCF2432).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 20:57, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Recreational path with two bicycles and an interesting roots formation North of Étangs Chabots in Auderghem, Belgium (DSCF2566-hdr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp enough, nice colours, quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 22:02, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Trois-Fontaines on a cloudy evening (Auderghem, Belgium, DSCF2586-hdr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 20:27, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mute swans and mallard ducks on étang Tenreuken (DSCF2628).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:56, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Passerelle de la Woluwe at night- Avenue de Tervuren (North) and Musee du Tram (right), Woluwe-Saint-Lambert, Belgium (DSCF2542).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me but I personally would crop out a bit of the sky (it's almost half of the image now). --Basotxerri 21:04, 14 January 2018 (UTC)  Done, it's closer to a third now --Trougnouf 21:18, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leafless branches and cloudy sky North of Étangs Chabots in Auderghem, Belgium (DSCF2576).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Very interesting. IMO a good photograph for black-and-white. But you should remove CAs first. And please check the sharpness. --XRay 09:22, 13 January 2018 (UTC) Done (in color, I can switch to BW if necessary for QI but I like the slight tone in the sky and it's practically BW already --Trougnouf 14:18, 13 January 2018 (UTC)  Support IMO OK now. Thank you. --XRay 06:47, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Recreational path with two bicycles and an interesting roots formation North of Étangs Chabots (looking NW) in Auderghem, Belgium (DSCF2572-hdr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please check your iamge nad remove the CAs. --XRay 09:23, 13 January 2018 (UTC) Done --Trougnouf 14:18, 13 January 2018 (UTC)  Support Better and IMO QI. Thank you. --XRay 06:48, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Problem in VI

Hi,Benoit; You forgot to sign your votes in VI. Regards --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

 Done, thank you --Trougnouf (talk) 10:53, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Schweinfurt denoising

Hi Trougnouf,thanks for the tip on my photo of the theatre in Schweinfurt. Interesting for me, of course, would be how you denoised the clip?--Ermell (talk) 10:09, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi Ermell, I used en:darktable's non-local means denoise module with a patch size of 4 (sharpest) and default other settings. Profiled denoise is usually darktable's most effective filter (with a blend of non-local means and wavelets) but it only works with raw files. --Trougnouf (talk) 10:53, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick answer. I use Define 2.0 as a Lightroom plugin which actually works quite well. At the Schweinfurt picture, however, I only used it in the last version.--Ermell (talk) 11:19, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Avenue de Tervuren (North with part of Musee du Tram visible on the right) from Passerelle de la Woluwe at night, Woluwe-Saint-Pierre, Belgium (DSCF2538-hdr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I find these evening images difficult to assess. But the photo seems fine to me.--Famberhorst 16:30, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Intersection of Avenue de Tervuren (ahead) and Boulevard du Souverain (right) viewed from Passerelle de la Woluwe in Woluwe-Saint-Pierre, Belgium at night (DSCF2548).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:39, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passerelle de la Woluwe at night, pedestrian bridge with some love locks in Woluwe-Saint-Lambert, Belgium (DSCF2549).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and contrast. I like it! --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 03:54, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mute swan on étang Tenreuken (DSCF2637 cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The nearby swan is beautiful, but the one in the middle distance on the left is blown and posterized. I find that distracting. Do you think you could dial back the brightness on that swan? -- Ikan Kekek 01:09, 15 January 2018 (UTC)  Done, I lowered the curve on the background swan --Trougnouf 03:59, 15 January 2018 (UTC)  Support - That swan still lacks details, but since it's not so bright, it's less distracting. This is OK for me. -- Ikan Kekek 07:25, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
De Brouckère metro station in Brussels, Belgium.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We do not know the country, the region or the city. It would be good to have this information in the caption and in the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Done I added the location to the image description and scope, thank you.
•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:25, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château des Trois Fontaines.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment I've already geocoded the picture. Does the category page need to be geocoded? --Trougnouf (talk) 16:58, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support The image is not very beautiful but it shows that the roof has been redone is therefore the best image qie we have. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:41, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Solex 99 30 padlock with keys (DSCF2659).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CYK algorithm animation showing every step of a sentence parsing.gif, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:15, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glass salvage containers in front of Park Tenreuken during the evening nautical twilight (Auderghem, Belgium, DSCF2732).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:00, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Étangs Chabots in Auderghem, Belgium (DSCF2563-hdr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment removed CA --Trougnouf 14:22, 13 January 2018 (UTC) Good quality. --PumpkinSky 22:05, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pennisetum planted in Parc Seny (Auderghem, Belgium, DSCF2718).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Comment The building in the background tilts to the left. Can you repair that? The branch in the air at the top right is also disturbing.--Famberhorst 16:54, 19 January 2018 (UTC)  Done. The building leans out on all sides so it never looks straight but I used the inside supports as a reference (building is being demolished I think). --Trougnouf 19:25, 19 January 2018 (UTC) OK. thank you.--Famberhorst 06:50, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glass salvage containers in front of Park Tenreuken during the day (Auderghem, Belgium, DSCF2709).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 19:58, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pond by Château des Trois Fontaines in Auderghem, Belgium (DSCF2580-hdr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Won't be one of my favourite shots, but OK for me. --Basotxerri 20:59, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alopochen aegyptiaca standing by étang Tenreuken, head back (Auderghem, Belgium, DSCF2852).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The photo is on the dark side. But good quality for me.--Famberhorst 19:13, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glass salvage containers in front of Park Tenreuken during the evening nautical twilight (Auderghem, Belgium, DSCF2726).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:54, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woluwe stream passing through parc Seny during the evening nautical twilight (Auderghem, Belgium, DSCF2725).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Reasonably realistic representation of how this would look. --Daniel Case 22:45, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alopochen aegyptiaca standing by étang Tenreuken (Auderghem, Belgium, DSCF2849).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Alright, I'll give you this one --Daniel Case 22:45, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mute swan standing on the shore of etang Tenreuken while eurasian coots and a mallard are swimming in the background (Auderghem, Belgium, DSCF3008).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:10, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mute swan swimming towards mallards while staring back at the photographer in park Tenreuken (Auderghem, Belgium, DSCF3012).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:21, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! JBL Flip 3 bluetooth speaker (DSCF2653).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Japanese School of Brussels entrance (DSCF2892).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK; I don't see anything terribly wrong with this one --Daniel Case 21:14, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mute swan and fulica atra in front of etang Tenreuken, Auderghem, Belgium (DSCF2958).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The swan's in focus, and that's all that really needs to be --Daniel Case 21:14, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alopochen aegyptiaca standing in parc Tenreuken (Auderghem, Belgium, DSCF2966).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Again, all we need to see clearly is the bird --Daniel Case 21:14, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alopochen aegyptiaca in parc Tenreuken (Auderghem, Belgium, DSCF2977).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Although the cars are distracting, we can still see the bird clearly. --Daniel Case 21:14, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alopochen aegyptiaca in parc Tenreuken (Auderghem, Belgium, DSCF2986).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Best of the set --Daniel Case 21:14, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abandoned SNCB B22490 type-K3 carriage in As, Belgium (DSCF3127-hdr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 23:45, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View through the shattered glass of a door in the SNCB B22490 type-K3 carriage, looking at a yellow H. Weyhausen KG backhoe loader in As, Belgium (DSCF3088-hdr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:11, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of an abandoned train track from the back of the SNCB B22495 type-K3 carriage in As, Belgium (DSCF3106-hdr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think you should dial back the highlights. I understand you don't want the interior to be too dark, so don't change the settings for the interior, but the exterior is too bright. -- Ikan Kekek 07:13, 1 February 2018 (UTC)  Done thank you --Trougnouf 17:40, 1 February 2018 (UTC)  Support - I'm not fully convinced, but I think this is good enough for QI now. -- Ikan Kekek 01:54, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of an abandoned train track from the back of the SNCB B22495 type-K3 carriage in As, Belgium (DSCF3109-hdr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This picture is too dark for 13:56, even under overcast skies in January, don't you think? It's also rather unsharp in places. Can you work on both of those things? -- Ikan Kekek 07:13, 1 February 2018 (UTC) Done, thanks for the helpful feedback!--Trougnouf 17:40, 1 February 2018 (UTC)  Support - You're welcome. I think you've substantially improved it. -- Ikan Kekek 01:56, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View inside the abandoned SNCB B22490 type-K3 carriage from B22495 in As, Belgium (DSCF3124-hdr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This is really a weird image but I like it. Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:03, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water treatment plant in an abandoned steel factory in Oupeye, Belgium (DSCF3285).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This low light creates a nice depth of view --PtrQs 00:54, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pipes in the water treatment plant of an abandoned steel factory in Oupeye, Belgium (DSCF3276).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 09:40, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abandoned Chertal steel factory in Oupeye, Belgium (DSCF3315).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 09:03, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sunset (civil twilight) in Maasmechelen, Belgium (DSCF3215-hdr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Granada 07:07, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osteria Sapori, restaurant inside a restored windmill in Maasmechelen, Belgium (DSCF3200-hdr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:01, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Inside an abandoned carriage in As, Belgium (1973 ANF Frangeco Crespin Blanc-Misseron Nord France, DSCF3163-hdr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Granada 07:07, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water plant in an abandoned steel factory in Oupeye, Belgium (DSCF3282).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:07, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Room in the water treatment plant of an abandoned steel factory in Oupeye, Belgium (DSCF3296-hdr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:07, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Machinery in the water treatment plant of an abandoned steel factory in Oupeye, Belgium (DSCF3293).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 09:26, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Black muscovy duck standing in a spring in molenvijverpark, Genk, Belgium (DSCF3043).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I did some adjustments in the file, good to go --Poco a poco 10:12, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water treatment plant of an abandoned steel factory in Oupeye, Belgium (DSCF3290).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:46, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barbed wires by the water treatment plant of an abandoned steel factory in Oupeye, Belgium (DSCF3303).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A nice use of neutral tones, and contrast between the rectilinearity of the walls and the randomness of the wire. But you could denoise it a little more. Just a little. --Daniel Case 01:02, 9 February 2018 (UTC)  Done I denoised it a bit more, thank you for your review! --Trougnouf 10:45, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Couple of muscovy ducks (male in the foreground) in molenvijverpark, Genk, Belgium (DSCF3031).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Clearly oversharpened, you see the artifacts on feathers and the blurred parts of the image? Please try to fix although I'm not sure if the result will be good enough. --Basotxerri 16:23, 8 February 2018 (UTC)}  Done, thank you for your review! I applied a stronger and softer denoising, non-local means' sharpest setting tends to create artifacts which I didn't notice then. I can still take down the wavelets sharpening if you think that's necessary still, I think it looks nicer and has minimal negative effect but it's not required. --Trougnouf 19:05, 8 February 2018 (UTC)  Weak support Look at the beak, it still seems a bit oversharpened. --Basotxerri 15:59, 9 February 2018 (UTC) I have no idea why that happened, the weird beak edge persists even if I disable sharpening and denoising altogether. I made a mask around the beak to mitigate the problem as much as possible, also restored the head which was missing details because of denoising. --Trougnouf 20:43, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Inside an abandoned military building in Fort de la Chartreuse, Liege, Belgium (DSCF3371).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Good overall quality. Blown light outside the windows, but interior is good. -- Ikan Kekek 01:14, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abandoned military building in Fort de la Chartreuse, Liege, Belgium (DSCF3380).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:03, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sinks inside an abandoned military building in Fort de la Chartreuse, Liege, Belgium (DSCF3387-hdr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:04, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hallway inside an abandoned military building in Fort de la Chartreuse, Liege, Belgium (DSCF3390-hdr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - There's a blown area a bit to the right of the upper left-hand corner, but that's beside the point, and the view of the hall is very good. -- Ikan Kekek 01:11, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abandoned military building in Fort de la Chartreuse, Liege, Belgium (DSCF3338).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:26, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abandoned military building in Fort de la Chartreuse, Liege, Belgium (DSCF3339).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:21, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Inside an abandoned military building in Fort de la Chartreuse, Liege, Belgium (DSCF3343).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak Pro bcs. I do not catch the story with the bicycle. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 06:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window inside an abandoned military building in Fort de la Chartreuse, Liege, Belgium (DSCF3349-hdr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 07:47, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Atlas at night in Liege, Belgium (DSCF3324).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality. --Kadellar 19:26, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Inside an abandoned military building in Fort de la Chartreuse, Liege, Belgium (DSCF3393-hdr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not the most beautiful environment to be, but the quality is high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 17:13, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roofs of abandoned military buildings in Fort de la Chartreuse, Liege, Belgium (DSCF3416).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 17:18, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roof of an abandoned military building in Fort de la Chartreuse, Liege, Belgium (DSCF3444-hdr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality. --Kadellar 17:47, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tunnel in Fort de la Chartreuse, Liege, Belgium (DSCF3453-hdr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 12:34, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! End of a tunnel in Fort de la Chartreuse, Liege, Belgium (DSCF3456-hdr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:34, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abandoned military building in Fort de la Chartreuse, Liege, Belgium (DSCF3475).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:14, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abandoned military building in Fort de la Chartreuse, Liege, Belgium (DSCF3368).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for an IQ --PJDespa 23:40, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Entrance to Sanatorium du Basil with a damaged bathtub, Stoumont, Belgium (DSCF3508).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:18, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! An entrance to Sanatorium du Basil, Stoumont, Belgium (DSCF3488).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1. However, I know it's a beautiful place (chateau de Froidcourt) but the sanatorium is not the nicest place to be --Michielverbeek 19:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sanatorium du Basil and a bicycle, looking West (Stoumont, Belgium, DSCF3491).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not a lovely place but quality of the image is good. --Halavar 16:50, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Center partial view of the front of Sanatorium du Basil, Stoumont, Belgium (DSCF3500).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:52, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Landscape in Barvaux during winter (PJDespa)

Bonjour, je viens de télécharger votre fichier. Il m'indique que c'est un doublon avec celui du sandbox. En outre, bien que ce soit le fichier que vous avez téléchargé dans le bac à sable, c'est toujours l'ancienne image qui apparait. Pourriez-vous voir ce qu'il en est ? Merci --PJDespa 21:45, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Desole j'avais oublie qu'il y a un duplicate check. Je vois que tu as reussi a uploader le fichier que j'ai denoise, ca s'affiche bien chez moi donc rafraichis la page (F5) si tu vois toujours l'ancienne version. --Trougnouf (talk) 09:51, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Large room leading to the kitchen in Sanatorium du Basil, Stoumont, Belgium (DSCF3534-hdr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:05, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Room with pretty view in Sanatorium du Basil, Stoumont, Belgium (DSCF3537-hdr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Damaged bathtub in front of an entrance to Sanatorium du Basil, Stoumont, Belgium (DSCF3514).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:16, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Broken glass door leading to the outdoor in Sanatorium du Basil, Stoumont, Belgium (DSCF3522).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:16, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elevator stopped between two floors in Sanatorium du Basil, Stoumont, Belgium (DSCF3580).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:13, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sanatorium du Basil front deck looking East during the evening civil twilight in Stoumont, Belgium (DSCF3599).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:53, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sanatorium du Basil front deck looking West at a standing pink human during the evening civil twilight in Stoumont, Belgium (DSCF3602).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:06, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sanatorium du Basil front deck looking West during the evening civil twilight in Stoumont, Belgium (DSCF3605).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:53, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Path leading to the front of Sanatorium du Basil, Stoumont, Belgium (DSCF3485).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PJDespa 22:19, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protected area of Fagne Tîrifaye with the Hill river viewed from a bicycle path in Waimes, Belgium (VeloTour 83-to-84, DSCF3672).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Draft horse pulling logs in Parc naturel Hautes Fagnes, Eupen, Belgium (VeloTour 54 to 55, DSCF3703).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:03, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Curved hallway in Sanatorium du Basil, Stoumont, Belgium (DSCF3581).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are some white hot pixels, could you remove them, please? --Basotxerri 16:18, 20 February 2018 (UTC)  Done, also made it brighter. --Trougnouf 18:28, 20 February 2018 (UTC) Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:03, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stream flowing towards the Hill river in High Fens, Eupen, Belgium (VeloTour intersection 84-to-54, DSCF3700.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments You're right, I was fooled by the bent trees. --Jacek Halicki 00:59, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stream flowing towards the Hill river in High Fens, Eupen, Belgium (VeloTour intersection 84-to-54, DSCF3701).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:59, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! IKEA Anderlecht self-serve warehouse (DSCF3733).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:08, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Change of scenery in Fagne Tirifaye, Waimes, Belgium (Velotour intersection 83-to-84, DSCF3661).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. The photograph is leaning in a little bit. --XRay 07:06, 25 February 2018 (UTC)  Done perspective correction applied --Trougnouf 18:00, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bicycle touring equipment in Fagne Tirifaye, Waimes, Belgium (VeloTour intersection 80, DSCF3656-hdr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:21, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Eupen and the Dam of the Vesdre, Belgium (VeloRoute intersection 41, DSCF3716).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality IMO --PJDespa 21:05, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fagne Tirifaye with the Hill river in Waimes, Belgium (DSCF3679).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:58, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fagne Tirifaye with the Hill river in Waimes, Belgium (DSCF3682).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:58, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour Anneessens in Brussels (DSCF4256).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:27, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour Anneessens in Brussels (DSCF4268).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:27, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! IKEA Anderlecht self-serve warehouse (DSCF3734).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:19, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bicycle friendly road in High Fens, Eupen, Belgium (VeloTour intersection 84, DSCF3691).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality IMO, please do remove the category 2018 in Liege for all the pictures taken in Eupen --PJDespa 22:27, 27 February 2018 (UTC)  Done, I moved 82 pictures to newly created parent Category:Liège (province) in 2018 (same style I used for Category:Quality images of Belgium by province which I think makes much more sense) --Trougnouf 23:19, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour de Villers in Brussels (DSCF4339).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 13:29, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour de Villers with art installation "Impasse" by Juliane Lavis and Bernard Declercq in Brussels (DSCF4342).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:34, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour de Villers with art installation "Impasse" by Juliane Lavis and Bernard Declercq in Brussels (DSCF4346).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:19, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hallway and doors in Sanatorium du Basil, Stoumont, Belgium (DSCF3558-hdr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 23:52, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View through a broken window from a room in Sanatorium du Basil, Stoumont, Belgium (DSCF3542,DSCF3545).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 23:53, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc Tenreuken looking South from the West side during the sunset nautical twilight, Auderghem, Belgium (DSCF3754).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 13:55, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avenue Daniel Boon 88, Auderghem, Belgium (DSCF3738).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 13:44, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc Tenreuken looking South from the West side during the sunset civil twilight, Auderghem, Belgium (DSCF3741-to-DSCF3743-b1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 13:44, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc Tenreuken looking South from the West side during the sunset civil twilight, Auderghem, Belgium (DSCF3745,DSCF3746-b1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 13:44, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc Tenreuken looking South from the West side during the sunset civil twilight, Auderghem, Belgium (DSCF3750).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 13:44, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chimney and building seen from a window in Sanatorium du Basil, Stoumont, Belgium (DSCF3573-to-DSCF3578).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok now. Good quality --Basile Morin 02:07, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dying pigeon at place de la Bourse, Brussels (DSCF4395).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wasn't meant to be an FP but I'll take it as a QI --Daniel Case 19:27, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sint-Annatunnel under the Scheldt in Antwerp, Belgium (DSCF3969).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:09, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pedestrian tunnel taking Chemin du Cyclotron below Boulevard Baudouin 1er, facing West (Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, DSCF1807).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, the long exposure (4 seconds) gives an impression of movement --PJDespa 22:12, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ottignies SNCB railway station- track 1 stairway and West exit from the tunnel connecting tracks (Belgium, DSCF4880).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:05, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antwerpen-Centraal railway station platform 21, Belgium (DSCF4760).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wow, Antwerp the most beautiful train station of the world. A dark sharp photo without noise, well done --Michielverbeek 21:04, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ottignies SNCB railway station- looking East in the tunnel connecting tracks (Belgium, DSCF4899).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, good long exposure --PJDespa 18:13, 01 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ottignies SNCB railway station- West exit from the tunnel connecting tracks (Belgium, DSCF4886).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:56, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Austrian Airlines Bombardier Dash 8 Q400 (flight 683) boarding at Vienna Airport, Austria (DSC 0003).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you remove the CAs, please? f/18 might not have been the perfect aperture for this shot, sharpness could be better. --Basotxerri 16:59, 4 April 2018 (UTC)  Done, thank you for your review. Most of my earlier shots (D3300 camera) suffer from this lack of sharpness due to excessively low aperture but I think it looks sharp enough at 200% of monitor. --Trougnouf 07:33, 5 April 2018 (UTC) OK, it was only a comment. Sorry for insisting, I still see CAs. I hope it's not a cache problem, please check. I've left a note on your image. --Basotxerri 15:30, 5 April 2018 (UTC)  Done, thank you for the notes! I had only noticed the lamppost's CA initially. --Trougnouf 15:59, 5 April 2018 (UTC) Thank you! OK for me. --Basotxerri 11:56, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Demande d'avis sur des photos

Bonjour, j'ai posté la candidature de deux images au titre de QI. Personne ne semble vouloir donner un avis (ni positif, ni négatif, ni un commentaire). Pourriez-vous donner votre avis ces deux photos (une du 6 avril et l'autre du 11 avril 2018) ?

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vissersstraat, Doel, Belgium (DSCF3782-to-DSCF3784).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --PJDespa 17:20, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vissersstraat (straight) and Pastorijstraat (left) with a bicycle laying on the intersection, Doel, Belgium (DSCF3793).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:47, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A tree South of Doel, Belgium (DSCF3811).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 12:44, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Molen (windmill) and the nuclear power plant cooling tower in Doel, Belgium (DSCF3862).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok The Photographer Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:54:32 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Container ship being towed in the Scheldt towards the Port of Antwerp, seen from Doel, Belgium (DSCF3880).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok The Photographer Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:55:36 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A tree South of Doel, Belgium (DSCF3807).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:54, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Two trees and the sun, looking South of Doel, Belgium (DSCF3831).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Carlos yo 14:38, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Patch of grass with view on the church and a bicycle on Camermanstraat in Doel, Belgium (DSCF3846).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 15:58, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Looking North on Vissersstraat, Doel, Belgium (DSCF3855).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --PJDespa 16:56, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Molen (windmill) and the nuclear power plant cooling tower in Doel, Belgium (DSCF3859).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:01, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Container ship being towed in the Scheldt towards the Port of Antwerp, seen from Doel, Belgium (DSCF3886).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but IMO main ship might have been a bit bnighter --Michielverbeek 13:24, 28 April 2018 (UTC)  Comment Thank you! I will be backpacking for the next few days but I'll brighten up the ship when I come back. --Trougnouf 23:19, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Container cranes at the MPET- MSC PSA European Terminal in Port of Antwerp (Kieldrecht, Belgium) during the sunset civil twilight (DSCF3901).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Basotxerri Sat, 28 Apr 2018 12:38:51 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Container cranes at the MPET- MSC PSA European Terminal in Port of Antwerp (Kieldrecht, Belgium) during the sunset civil twilight (DSCF3904).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:32, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railway and the Doel nuclear power station cooling tower during sunset civil twilight in Kieldrecht, Belgium (DSCF3913).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:33, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walkway along the Scheldt leading to the Port of Antwerp (Doel, Belgium, DSCF3865).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walkway along the Scheldt leading to the Port of Antwerp (Doel, Belgium, DSCF3874).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Code issues in User:Trougnouf/QICvote.js

Hi Trougnouf, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:Trougnouf/QICvote.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 51 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. ISSUE: line 146 character 37: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: var results = new RegExp("[\?&]section=([^&#]*)").exec(url);
2. ISSUE: line 210 character 80: Unclosed string. - Evidence: return '[[User:' + userName + '|' + userName + ']] '+ _getDateElement';
3. ISSUE: line 211 character 6: Unclosed string. - Evidence: }
4. ISSUE: line 212 character 1: Unclosed string. - Evidence:
5. ISSUE: line 213 character 55: Unclosed string. - Evidence: function _addVote(content, image, type, comment) {
6. ISSUE: line 214 character 53: Unclosed string. - Evidence: const reg = escapeRegExp(image) + "(.*)\\n";
7. ISSUE: line 215 character 65: Unclosed string. - Evidence: let nomination = content.match(new RegExp(reg, "g"))[0];
8. ISSUE: line 216 character 9: Unclosed string. - Evidence:
9. ISSUE: line 217 character 64: Unclosed string. - Evidence: let newNomination = getNominationType(nomination,type);
10. ISSUE: line 218 character 9: Unclosed string. - Evidence:
11. ISSUE: line 219 character 143: Unclosed string. - Evidence: newNomination = _remplaceLast(newNomination, "}}", getEOL(newNomination) + getVoteTemplate (type) + comment + _getSignature() + "}}");
12. ISSUE: line 220 character 1: Unclosed string. - Evidence:
13. ISSUE: line 221 character 59: Unclosed string. - Evidence: return content.replace(nomination, newNomination);
14. ISSUE: line 222 character 6: Unclosed string. - Evidence: }
15. ISSUE: line 223 character 1: Unclosed string. - Evidence:
16. ISSUE: line 224 character 41: Unclosed string. - Evidence: function scapeFilenames(filesname) {
17. ISSUE: line 225 character 39: Unclosed string. - Evidence: function removeSpaces(match) {
18. ISSUE: line 226 character 36: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: return match.replace(/\ /g, "_");
19. ISSUE: line 226 character 46: Unclosed string. - Evidence: return match.replace(/\ /g, "_");
20. ISSUE: line 227 character 10: Unclosed string. - Evidence: }
21. ISSUE: line 228 character 46: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: return filesname.replace(/File:(.*?)\|\{\{+/g, removeSpaces);
22. ISSUE: line 228 character 48: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: return filesname.replace(/File:(.*?)\|\{\{+/g, removeSpaces);
23. ISSUE: line 228 character 50: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: return filesname.replace(/File:(.*?)\|\{\{+/g, removeSpaces);
24. ISSUE: line 228 character 70: Unclosed string. - Evidence: return filesname.replace(/File:(.*?)\|\{\{+/g, removeSpaces);
25. ISSUE: line 229 character 6: Unclosed string. - Evidence: }
26. ISSUE: line 230 character 5: Unclosed string. - Evidence:
27. ISSUE: line 231 character 42: Unclosed string. - Evidence: function isDiscuss(oldType,newType) {
28. ISSUE: line 232 character 136: Unclosed string. - Evidence: return ((oldType==="Promotion" && newType=="Decline") || (newType==="Promotion" && oldType=="Decline") || oldType =="Discuss");
29. ISSUE: line 233 character 6: Unclosed string. - Evidence: }
30. ISSUE: line 234 character 5: Unclosed string. - Evidence:
31. ISSUE: line 235 character 61: Unclosed string. - Evidence: function getNominationType(nomination,newType) {
32. ISSUE: line 236 character 36: Unclosed string. - Evidence: function setType(oldType) {
33. ISSUE: line 237 character 65: Unclosed string. - Evidence: oldType = oldType.replace("{{/","").replace("|","");
34. ISSUE: line 238 character 44: Unclosed string. - Evidence: if (isDiscuss(oldType,newType))
35. ISSUE: line 239 character 14: Unclosed string. - Evidence: {
36. ISSUE: line 240 character 37: Unclosed string. - Evidence: newType = "Discuss";
37. ISSUE: line 241 character 14: Unclosed string. - Evidence: }
38. ISSUE: line 242 character 44: Unclosed string. - Evidence: return ("{{/" + newType+ "|");
39. ISSUE: line 243 character 10: Unclosed string. - Evidence: }
40. ISSUE: line 244 character 37: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: return nomination.replace(/\{\{\/(Nomination|Promotion|Decline|Discuss)\|/g, setType);
41. ISSUE: line 244 character 39: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: return nomination.replace(/\{\{\/(Nomination|Promotion|Decline|Discuss)\|/g, setType);
42. ISSUE: line 244 character 81: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: return nomination.replace(/\{\{\/(Nomination|Promotion|Decline|Discuss)\|/g, setType);
43. ISSUE: line 244 character 95: Unclosed string. - Evidence: return nomination.replace(/\{\{\/(Nomination|Promotion|Decline|Discuss)\|/g, setType);
44. ISSUE: line 245 character 6: Unclosed string. - Evidence: }
45. ISSUE: line 246 character 1: Unclosed string. - Evidence:
46. ISSUE: line 247 character 27: Unclosed string. - Evidence: function _addVotes() {
47. ISSUE: line 248 character 56: Unclosed string. - Evidence: $.each(votes, function(section, votesSection) {
48. ISSUE: line 249 character 86: Unclosed string. - Evidence: if ((typeof votesSection !== "undefined") && (votesSection.length > 0)) {
49. ISSUE: line 250 character 65: Unclosed string. - Evidence: getSection(section - 1).then(function(content) {
50. ISSUE: line 251 character 55: Unclosed string. - Evidence: content = scapeFilenames(content);
51. ISSUE: line 251 character 55: Too many errors. (60% scanned). - Evidence: undefined

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 17:01, 3 May 2018 (UTC).

Code issues in User:Trougnouf/QICvote.js

Hi Trougnouf, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:Trougnouf/QICvote.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new esprima issue — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. ERROR: Cannot parse line 210 column 75: Unexpected token ILLEGAL

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 17:01, 3 May 2018 (UTC).

Code issues in User:Trougnouf/QICvote.js

Hi Trougnouf, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:Trougnouf/QICvote.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. ISSUE: line 146 character 37: Bad or unnecessary escaping. - Evidence: var results = new RegExp("[\?&]section=([^&#]*)").exec(url);
2. ISSUE: line 210 character 86: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: 'July', 'August', 'September', 'October', 'November', 'December']

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 19:50, 3 May 2018 (UTC).

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Construction site of the BNP Paribas Fortis headquarter in Montagne du Parc, Brussels, Belgium (DSCF4134).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --The Photographer 01:15, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Construction site of the BNP Paribas Fortis headquarter in Montagne du Parc, Brussels, Belgium (DSCF4137).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --The Photographer 01:15, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Container cranes at the MPET- MSC PSA European Terminal in Port of Antwerp (Kieldrecht, Belgium) during the sunset civil twilight (DSCF3919).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Poco a poco Thu, 03 May 2018 18:47:19 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antwerp Euroterminal NV during sunset civil twilight in Kieldrecht, Belgium (DSCF3937).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:41, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Container art on the roundabout connecting Hazopweg, Steenlandlaan, and Steenlandlaan in Kallo, Belgium during sunset nautical twilight (DSCF3949).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Nice art and good quality photo, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 16:46, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! West end of the Sint-Annatunnel with two bicycles in Antwerp, Belgium (DSCF3975).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Basotxerri Thu, 03 May 2018 16:10:16 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jeanneke Pis, Brussels, Belgium (DSCF4010).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Billy69150 12:50, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ottignies train station platform 3 from the South side (Belgium, DSCF4167).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:25, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ottignies train station from the South side overpass (Belgium, DSCF4173).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Weak  Support. Sharpness could be better. It looks like focus on the post in front of the platform. --XRay 04:52, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ottignies train station from the South side overpass (Belgium, DSCF4179).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:26, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ottignies train station from the South side overpass (Belgium, DSCF4182).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Same minor problems with sharpness, acceptable. --XRay 04:53, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée L during civil twilight (Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, DSCF4200).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:25, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 24 heures velo 30-years memorial by Vincent Rousseau in Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium (DSCF4224).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:25, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Louvain-la-Neuve train station track 1 during civil twilight (Belgium, DSCF4228).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:37, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 24 heures velo 30-years memorial by Vincent Rousseau in Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium (DSCF4203).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Weak support. IMO technically OK but the background behind the sculpture is disturbing. Maybe it would have been better to shoot the sculpture in another angle. --Basotxerri 07:39, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de Villers during the evening civil twilight in Brussels, Belgium (DSCF4351).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 14:53, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Natural Corner organic store on the corner of Rue de Dinant and Rue de l'Escalier during the evening civil twilight in Brussels, Belgium (DSCF4330).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and exposure.--ArildV 18:23, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place Saint-Jean looking towards Rue de la Violette during the sunset civil twilight in Brussels, Belgium (DSCF4297).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Billy69150 15:41, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de la Violette as seen from Place Saint-Jean during the evening civil twilight in Brussels, Belgium (DSCF4300).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PJDespa 23:29, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jacques Brel memorial bronze statue by Tom Frantzen on place de la Vieille Halle aux Blés during the evening civil twilight in Brussels, Belgium (DSCF4316).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PJDespa 23:23, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jacques Brel memorial bronze statue by Tom Frantzen on place de la Vieille Halle aux Blés during the evening civil twilight in Brussels, Belgium (DSCF4319).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PJDespa 23:23, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place de la Vieille Halle aux Blés (looking South-West) during the evening civil twilight in Brussels, Belgium (DSCF4309).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice urban evening mood. If only that wire weren't there ... --Daniel Case 21:04, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rock dove (Columba livia) standing on place de la Bourse, Brussels, Belgium (DSCF4426).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:25, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rock dove (Columba livia) standing on place de la Bourse, Brussels, Belgium (DSCF4427).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice crisp pigeon portrait. -- Ikan Kekek 04:54, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rock dove (Columba livia) standing on place de la Bourse, Brussels, Belgium (DSCF4428).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. I like this one the most I think, it's nicely facing your camera --Podzemnik 01:37, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rock dove (Columba livia) standing on place de la Bourse, Brussels, Belgium (DSCF4429).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments No need to apologize. This pigeon is indeed an excellent model. Good quality, a little soft on the head but still quite good. -- Ikan Kekek 04:58, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rock dove (Columba livia) standing on place de la Bourse, Brussels, Belgium (DSCF4421-middlecrop).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:06, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rock dove (Columba livia) walking on place de la Bourse, Brussels, Belgium (DSCF4422).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Crop needed. The cut-off pigeon in the background is disturbing.--Peulle 17:29, 31 May 2018 (UTC) Would it be better to crop the left pigeon out entirely? I feel that the current cut is not as disturbing as cutting off the main subject's shadow. I uploaded the uncropped picture on File:Rock dove (Columba livia) walking on place de la Bourse, Brussels, Belgium (DSCF4422, uncropped).jpg, a (better IMO) alternative would be to uncrop a bit to the left (until the left-bottom pigeon begins) and inpaint the top-left pigeon's tail. --Trougnouf 18:37, 31 May 2018 (UTC) My opinion: get rid of it. Make the crop and leave only the pigeon that is in focus. It will not be downsizing, since you're not changing the resolution, just cutting away something that came into the frame.--Peulle 19:43, 31 May 2018 (UTC) @Trougnouf: Is there a spot removal function in Darktable? Try to remove the cut-off pigeon. BTW, the image is really cool. --Basotxerri 19:55, 31 May 2018 (UTC)Thank you! I got the best of both worlds, I managed to inpaint the bird on the left at last using a combination of darktable's spot removal (which did most of the work) and gimp's resynthesize plugin --Trougnouf 20:56, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Three rock doves (Columba livia) standing on place de la Bourse, Brussels, Belgium (DSCF4423).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:48, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rock dove (Columba livia) standing on place de la Bourse, Brussels, Belgium (DSCF4424-cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I must say these are better than your building photos - maybe you have a talent for bird photography? --Peulle 17:30, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rock dove (Columba livia) standing on place de la Bourse, Brussels, Belgium (DSCF4425).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:48, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 08:16, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rock doves (Columba livia) standing on place de la Bourse, Brussels, Belgium (DSCF4430).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:48, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brussels comic book route- Victor Sackville on rue du Marché au Charbon (Belgium, DSCF4459).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Shadows a little bit dark, but it's a result of the sun at the top. --XRay 04:48, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rock pigeon (Columba livia) inspecting the curb at place de la Bourse, Brussels, Belgium (DSCF4415).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:02, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manneken Pis (DSCF4463).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:50, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brussels comic book route- Olivier Rameau (DSCF4472).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well-captured. -- Ikan Kekek 02:40, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manneken Peace mural in Brussels (DSCF4473).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 13:14, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Impasse by Juliane Lavis and Bernard Declercq, art within Tour de Villers in Brussels, Belgium (DSCF4479).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:02, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manneken Pis, Brussels (DSCF4465).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:52, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manneken Pis, Brussels (DSCF4466-crop).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:03, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Tunnel Belliard, coming out on Rue de la Loi.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tunnel Belliard, coming out on Rue de la Loi.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Garden snail moving down the Vennbahn in disputed territory (DSCF5879).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Good use of DoF. --Basotxerri 17:12, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Garden snail moving down the Vennbahn in disputed territory (DSCF5880).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 06:11, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! GR 12- turn right from Rue du Chêne to Rue de l'Etuve in Brussels (DSCF4469).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:18, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

QI Candidate Help

Hi, I nominated a picture of mine for QI. One reviewer told me to sort the tilting so I done all that which then told me is still tilted so I redone the cropping. I'm not sure if I'm impatience or not but he not the fastest at responding my pings and letting him know I done the fixes. The picture hasn't been promoted nor declined. Do I have to put it in Consensual Review if nobody else can evaluate it. --Vauxford (talk) 13:05, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi Vauxford, normally the consensual review is for pictures that have been formally declined. You are free to either wait for someone to give your picture a decisive review (anyone can still review it regardless of the comment, and you can nominate it again if it remains unassessed and it's taken off the candidates list), or put it in the consensual review section if you feel that more people should get involved in the reviewing process. I think it would be best to wait a few days since Basotxerri like any volunteer on commons doesn't necessarily login that often, and someone else may even review it by then. I won't offer to review your picture because cars are not my area of interest but I can tell you that it needs a perspective correction because the vertical lines (seen in the background on the house) should all be completely vertical (ie Distortions in Commons:Image_guidelines#Quality_and_featured_photographic_images) without making the car tilt. --Trougnouf (talk) 14:14, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

@Trougnouf: Indeed. Thank you for the advice and help. I appreciate it. I have done a bit of prespective correction I think. I must say it does look better. --Vauxford (talk) 14:17, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

I totally agree with Trougnouf. And we shouldn't abuse the consensual review but I think sometimes when we're not sure it's the best way to ask others there. --Basotxerri (talk) 15:50, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manneken Pis, Brussels (DSCF4467).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PJDespa 17:22, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skateboarder jumping over a cardboard box at Skatepark des Ursulines in Brussels, Belgium (DSCF4497-cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 15:03, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skateboarder jumping off a ledge at Skatepark des Ursulines in Brussels (DSCF4486).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:21, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water flowing through a narrow passage at Plitvice Lakes National Park in Croatia (DSC 0348).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I'm assuming that's not color noise in the water, just natural colors --Daniel Case 17:43, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Honoré cake with chocolate (DSCF4539).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, I love this cake! Tournasol7 23:05, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antwerp Central station train shed and underground levels (DSCF4745).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 21:44, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antwerp central station level -2 track 22 (DSCF4772).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good job here --Podzemnik 01:55, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antwerp Central Station level -2 (DSCF4773).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:55, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rainbow over Brussels (DSCF6478).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:00, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lychnis chalcedonica flowers (DSCF6457).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good sharpness, but it's a little bit too dark IMO. Tournasol7 17:08, 12 June 2018 (UTC)  Done I increased the exposure a bit, thank you. --Trougnouf 18:41, 12 June 2018 (UTC) Thank you for you. It looks better now. Tournasol7 14:55, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of SNCB Desiro ML (Class AM08 08161 at Antwerp Central Station, DSCF4795).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:26, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cyclonudista 2018 DSCF6497.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:00, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cyclonudista 2018 DSCF6563.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:00, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:De Molen (windmill) and the nuclear power plant cooling tower in Doel, Belgium (DSCF3859).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:De Molen (windmill) and the nuclear power plant cooling tower in Doel, Belgium (DSCF3859).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cyclonudista 2018 DSCF6568.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 23:35, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cyclonudista 2018 DSCF6595.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Nice documentation, thanks for that! --Podzemnik 23:38, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cyclonudista 2018 DSCF6612.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 23:38, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cyclonudista 2018 DSCF6619 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 23:38, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cyclonudista 2018 DSCF6703.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 23:38, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cyclonudista 2018 DSCF6479.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 23:56, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cyclonudista 2018 DSCF6510.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 23:56, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cyclonudista 2018 DSCF6751.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 23:56, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cyclonudista 2018 DSCF6753.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 14:41, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cyclonudista 2018 DSCF6743.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:24, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SNCB Desiro ML (Class AM08 08197) end at Antwerp Central Station level -2 platform 22 (DSCF4779).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:34, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SNCB Desiro ML (Class AM08 08197) at Antwerp Central Station level -2 platform 22 looking towards the main hall (DSCF4782).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:36, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antwerp central station, looking towards the main hall from level -2 track 22 (DSCF4787).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:37, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SNCB Desiro ML (Class AM08 08161) parked on level -2 platform 21 at Antwerp Central Station (DSCF4794).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:36, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cyclonudista 2018 DSCF6886.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:35, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cyclonudista 2018 DSCF6701.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, funny subject. -- MJJR 07:47, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cyclonudista 2018 DSCF6599.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PJDespa 11:40, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cyclonudista 2018 DSCF6658.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PJDespa 11:40, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cyclonudista 2018 DSCF6679.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Don't we have enough pictures of this ridiculous event? -- Spurzem 22:23, 24 June 2018 (UTC) I took over 400 pictures of the event. I would like to move on to some of the pretty pictures I recently uploaded but I nominate all pictures I think are of good quality in the order I uploaded them. I don't think this is a ridiculous event, decriminalizing nudity is a cause that's very important to me and I would like to do a good job documenting it (I even made Category:Quality images of World Naked Bike Ride), and that's besides the point, there is no limit on the number of quality images of a subject and most of those are far from identical. (I also try to categorize and describe the ones I nominate properly, and I do add the nsfw template to the nominations out of consideration.) --Trougnouf 23:22, 24 June 2018 (UTC) Good quality despite the inappropriate opinion of Spurzem.--PJDespa 11:40, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lychnis chalcedonica flowers (DSCF6457).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lychnis chalcedonica flowers (DSCF6457).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 29 June 2018 (UTC)