Open main menu
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−


Hello, Vysotsky!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:58, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Files you uploaded may be deleted

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have not sent the permission, please send it to "permissions-commons wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. If you have, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard, quoting the file name, so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 05:15, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Pierre Vinken.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pierre Vinken.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Pierre Vinken.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Vera (talk) 23:41, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Image replaced after clearance as Image:AMGATE 6059 138 TICH R202697542459865.jpg Vysotsky (talk) 14:30, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

File:EJBrill.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:21, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Done (information added). Vysotsky (talk) 20:02, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Rijswijk1940.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Rijswijk1940.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Prüm (talk) 15:11, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Information added. Vysotsky (talk) 20:04, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Stanislaus Kostka.jpg

 
File:Stanislaus Kostka.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 19:59, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Clearance of copyright asked from holders. Vysotsky (talk) 20:02, 28 October 2012 (UTC) Clearance given by copyright holders; proof deposited. Image replaced under different heading. Vysotsky (talk) 14:59, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

File:JimFouche.jpg

 
File:JimFouche.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wikia is geen bron, net zoals dat je Wikipedia niet als bron mag noemen. Wikia is wat dat betreft nog minder authoritair aangezien het knip en plak werk is van fans. Er staan héél véél auteursrechtenschendingen op Wikia Vera (talk) 20:14, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Right. Vysotsky (talk) 20:02, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Vrouwenarbeid.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Vrouwenarbeid.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Done. Vysotsky (talk) 20:02, 28 October 2012 (UTC) And also:

Please provide hotlinks to where you found them on Europeana, Yours sincerely Vera (talk) 20:37, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Done. Vysotsky (talk) 20:02, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Mail

Trijnsteltalk 22:00, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Gereageerd op mijn overlegpagina. :) Trijnsteltalk 10:59, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

File:GJelgersma.jpg

 
File:GJelgersma.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 18:19, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

File:GJelgersma.jpg

 
File:GJelgersma.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 18:40, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. INeverCry 22:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Categories: Chess players from...

Hello. Please, do not add categories "Chess players from..." to images which have their own categories, like File:Hans Ree 1968.jpg - there is category Category:Hans Ree which is in category Category:Chess players from the Netherlands. That doubles categories and this is mistake. Did you made many of editions such this? Please, correct that. Regards, pjahr @ 11:39, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

The same to adding category:Chess grandmasters. If main category about player consists that category, there is no need to add this category to each image. You did a lot of mess... pjahr @ 11:46, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Didn't know that. I will correct the things I changed with players who have their own category. Thanks for the tip. Vysotsky (talk) 21:14, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

I corrected everything, I suppose. Regards, pjahr @ 22:01, 31 August 2013 (UTC) Thanks! Vysotsky (talk) 22:08, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:CarelStolker.jpg

català | čeština | Deutsch | English | español | suomi | français | magyar | 日本語 | македонски | Nederlands | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenščina | +/−
 
The File:CarelStolker.jpg which you uploaded has been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly.

JuTa 21:07, 27 September 2013 (UTC)


Clock

Hi Vysotsky,

Thought you might like the clock on the right side. It is based on the time categories we discussed the other day.

Cheers. --  Docu  at 09:32, 21 December 2013 (UTC) Nice. Thanks! Vysotsky (talk) 21:04, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Holiday wishes

 
Happy Holidays!

Vera (talk) 14:28, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Nederlands | +/−

File:SimonvanderMeer.jpg

 
File:SimonvanderMeer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

shizhao (talk) 03:27, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Scipione-riva-rocci-4.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Scipione-riva-rocci-4.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 20:34, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

4 your information

Your edit in File:AratKilo.jpg

  • Category:Time 02:23 it means Time 02:23: clocks and watches displaying the time 02:23. For 12-hour clocks, this may be at 02:23 a.m. or at 02:23 p.m. (14:23)
  • Category:Time 14:23 it means Time 14:23: clocks and watches displaying the time 14:23 (2:23 pm). 12-hour clocks are categorized in category:Time 02:23

Greats --217.246.221.222 08:04, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I will keep it in mind. See also this proposal. Vysotsky (talk) 13:27, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

ArchiveBot

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:43, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Leiden109.JPG

 
File:Leiden109.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 14:45, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Dank voor de melding. Ik heb het nog nagevraagd bij de maker van de op straat gefotografeerde poster. Hij had geen bezwaar tegen opname in Wikipedia, maar wilde geen CC-BY-SA-licentie afgeven. Terecht verwijderd dus. Vysotsky (talk) 13:45, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Bonaventura College

Hoi Vysotsky,

Ik zag een foto van jou gemaakt in het Bonaventura College te Leiden. Boudewijn Büch is daar opgeleid. Kun je er een artikel over in elkaar draaien? 151.40.247.75 13:38, 10 July 2014 (UTC) (Klaas `Z4us` V o.b.a. Patio)
Beste 151.40.247.75, Dank voor je vraag. Als je inlogt, zie je dat je mij ook een email kan sturen. Als je je vraag wat toelicht (waar is het artikeltje voor bestemd, wat moet precies het onderwerp zijn), wil ik er wel serieus naar kijken. Vysotsky (talk) 13:49, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Zo is geschied :-) Alvast dank voor wat je er mee gaat doen. Gewoon w:nl:Bonaventuracollege donorprincipe of zoiets. Ga je het niet aanmaken, even goede vrinden, collega!  Klaas|Z4␟V:  07:52, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Onze Jan

Hi Vysotsky. Category:Onze Jan Hofmeyr seems to be a duplicate of Category:Jan Hendrik Hofmeyr (1845–1909). Do you mind if I merge them? HelenOnline 15:10, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Please do. Thank you! Vysotsky (talk) 15:13, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Cambridge49.JPG

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Cambridge49.JPG. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Railway timetables are eligible for copyright - the data (probably) isn't, but the presentation is.-mattbuck (Talk) 09:22, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Naturalis1.JPG

 
File:Naturalis1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 00:25, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Images from Anefo

That would be right if these photographers worked for Anefo all their life, but they didn't. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 20:26, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Skip or workaround? How to connect otherwise? Vysotsky (talk) 20:30, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
    • BTW, Johan Cruyff is (WikiCommons) member of Category:Players of Feyenoord. Vysotsky (talk) 20:32, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Most of the individual images already have the category Images from Anefo assigned to them, so there is no need for it. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 20:34, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
      • Perhaps link them to Category:Anefo - Algemeen Nederlands Foto ? Because all their photographs clearly aren't Images from Anefo, but they once were employees. And it's important to link them to Anefo as photographers too, in my point of view. Vysotsky (talk) 20:37, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
        • I understand. Okay, do what you think is appropriate. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 20:40, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
          • Thanks. I'll change to Anefo - Algemeen Nederlands Foto. If you look at it and think it's a misfit, don't hesitate and delete. Vysotsky (talk) 20:46, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Rename

Hoi Vysotsky, je vroeg om een hernoeming van File:Portret Marieke Bok.tiff. De naam die je voorstelde is echter mi ongeschikt omdat het lijkt alsof de persoon Leertouwer Bok heet. Ik stel voor km te hernoemen naar "Lammert Leertouwer by Marike Bok". Laat me weten wat je denkt en indien akkoord dan hernoem ik het bestand. Mvg, Taketa (talk) 12:36, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Prima! Vysotsky (talk) 13:39, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

File:AnkvdMoer.jpg

 
File:AnkvdMoer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 10:38, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Vysotsky, ich habe es glücklicherweise bei www.spaarnestadphoto.nl gefunden. Du siehst an diesem Beispiel, wie wichtig es ist, den "spaarnestadphoto-PD-Baustein" zu setzen! (Ich habe mich schon gewundert über deine eigene PD-Begründung, denn hier schlagen sofort die Commons-Löschteufel zu). Könntest Du bitte einmal das Nationaal Archief prüfen, ob deren Bilder nicht ohnehin alle PD sind? mfg --Drdoht (talk) 11:28, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Stones1982KuipRotterdamMarcelAntonisse.jpg

 
File:Stones1982KuipRotterdamMarcelAntonisse.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

1989 20:57, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:FvanRaemdonck.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:FvanRaemdonck.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 13:24, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Image collections at Dutch universities

File:AyaZikken.png

 
File:AyaZikken.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Buxtehude (talk) 12:26, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Cambridge42.JPG

 
File:Cambridge42.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 11:25, 4 March 2015 (UTC)


File tagging File:TKoopmans.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:TKoopmans.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:TKoopmans.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

NickK (talk) 03:39, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Porto69.JPG

Hello Vysotsky The building is the Port of Leixões Cruise Terminal building located in the harbour of Matosinhos.Kolforn (talk) 07:46, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Great! Thanks, Vysotsky (talk) 07:47, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Porto Leixões Cruise Terminal

Hello Vysotsky I have requested that the title of [1] be changed to "Porto Leixões Cruise Terminal" as this reflects a more accurate description of the prominent feature in the centre of your photograph. A more accurate description will help search engines discover your image in Commons. I hope you are happy with this?Kolforn (talk) 06:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! Vysotsky (talk) 08:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Archief Leiden

Hey, Hoeveel behoefte is er denk je aan het kunnen downloaden van hoge resolutie foto's van het archief van Leiden? Ik ben al redelijk ver met het reverse engineeren van waar je die vandaan zou moeten krijgen. Het implementeren van automatiseren is nog wel even een kriem. Ik zie dat je de 250x250 thumbnails uploadt, als je dat gedeelte van de URL verandert in 500x500, heb je al snel iets meer. --Vera (talk) 09:11, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Beste 1Veertje, Dank voor de tip! Vysotsky (talk) 09:33, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Hey, ik heb de Dememorixer ontwikkeld. Nu is het redelijk makkelijk de volle resolutie te krijgen. Simpelweg de code die bij "insluiten" staat daar plakken. --Vera (talk) 09:52, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

File:LEI001018092.jpg

 
File:LEI001018092.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 09:56, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Category:Samuel Sarphati

Wederom dank voor je bedankje. Het is toch wel grappig dat onze wegen daar weer kruisen. -- Mdd (talk) 17:38, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:AGvanHamel(Keltic).jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:AGvanHamel(Keltic).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 10:36, 27 September 2015 (UTC)


  Hello, Vysotsky. You have new messages at JotaCartas's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

OppenheimGijselaarLorentz1917.jpg

File:OppenheimGijselaarLorentz1917.jpg heeft een niet-werkende URL, kon hem zelf niet terugvinden. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 14:32, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Beste Sjoerd de Bruin, Dank voor je melding. Het klopt dat deze URL niet meer werkt. Nog vervelender is, dat het niet de enige verbroken link in GaHetNa is. Ik heb honderden zogenaamde "permanente" URLs overgenomen uit deze website van het Nationaal Archief, maar een deel van die links werkt niet meer, omdat ze in GaHetNa zelf inmiddels veranderd zijn. De permalinks naar ANEFO-afbeeldigen lijken allemaal nog wél te werken, maar de links naar veel andere afbeeldingen zijn verbroken. De afbeelding zelf is gewoon aanwezig in de betreffende website: de afbeelding waar jij over mailt, staat netjes hier, maar de URL is veranderd: de oude -nu niet meer werkende- URL is vervangen door een nieuwe URL die ook niet lijkt te werken. (En zoeken met de correcte naam van de Nobelprijswinnaar helpt niet, want hij heet in het bijschrift Laurentz). Ik merkte die op grote schaal veranderde links zelf op in augustus 2015, en heb toen per email navraag gedaan bij het Nationaal Archief, maar ondanks herhaling van mijn vraag nog geen antwoord gekregen. Ik weet dus ook niet of deze links uit GaHetNa allemaal handmatig in Commons vervangen moeten worden, of dat het op een andere manier [in GaHetNa] in orde komt. Vysotsky (talk) 15:06, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Category:Security_Service_of_the_Netherlands

Sanandros (talk) 15:55, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Category:Unidentified churches in the United Kingdom

Thankyou for donating your images File:Church21.JPG, File:Church22.JPG and File:Church23.JPG. They are categorised as "Unidentified churches in the United Kingdom". Please will you help to identify them? You describe the locations as "along the road from Cambridge to Harwich", but I don't know which road you mean. Do you remember the road numbers, or the names of some places you passed?

Thanks, Motacilla (talk) 11:03, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Within 10 miles from Bradfield? Vysotsky (talk) 22:02, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
3 unidentified churches now identified (Bradfield & Dovercourt). @Motacilla: thanks for asking the question. Vysotsky (talk) 08:44, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Vraagje

Ik zag je net hier een bron toevoegen. Op grond waarvan laat je de foto staan? De fotograaf is pas in 1983 overleden en ik zie -ook in die bron- geen toestemming voor gebruik. Het is in elk geval zeker geen eigen werk van de uploader. Ronn (talk) 16:54, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

De bron en het jaar heb ik toegevoegd om duidelijk te maken dat de uploader niet de foto gemaakt had (want hij of zij stond vast niet in 1930 achter de camera). Ik zal ook de licentie in twijfel trekken, maar ik wilde de uploader even een dag de gelegenheid geven er een andere bron tegenover te zetten. Wellicht dat de familie etc.? Vysotsky (talk) 17:17, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Ik ben geen voorstander van verwijderen hoor, maar de licentie moet wel kloppen natuurlijk. Had de fotograaf maar niet achterhaald, dan hadden we 'm kunnen laten staan omdat hij meer dan 70 jaar geleden anoniem is gepubliceerd. Haha Gr. Ronn (talk) 17:26, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Ik zeg altijd tegen mezelf: Blijf rustig en respecteer auteursrecht Vysotsky (talk) 23:14, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Avenue de France, Paris2015.JPG

 
File:Avenue de France, Paris2015.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Civa (talk) 11:38, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Escher.jpg

 
File:Escher.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hop on Bananas (talk) 02:37, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

File:2011 Busquets 3.png

Hoi Vysotsky, mooi dat je wat foto's van de Praemium Erasmianum Foundation vrijgegeven hebt weten te krijgen. Kan je ervoor zorgen dat er een correcte toestemming in OTRS komt? Multichill (talk) 17:06, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Dear Multichill, Thanks need to go to SPE (Praemium Erasmianum Foundation). SPE sent me pictures of laureates still lacking a photograph in Wikipedia. I uploaded twelve of these photographs, and they are now used more than 60 times on several Wikipedia's (and even more on different user pages). I sent the letter in which SPE gave usage permission (CC-BY-SA-license) to OTRS-NL on 15 December 2015 at 14:24 hr. December is a busy month, I guess. Vysotsky (talk) 23:02, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Now I see the email in the OTRS queue. I probably looked in the wrong queue the other day. Great! Thanks for the effort. Multichill (talk) 21:00, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:WCWilliamsWallpoem.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:WCWilliamsWallpoem.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

DieseEineIP (talk) 00:10, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Summary

Description
English: Concertgebouw Amsterdam, 1 Sept. 1967. Standing, from left to right: Michael Cooper, Mick Jagger, a pregnant Marianne Faithfull, Al Vandenberg, Brian Jones. Sitting:Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. Photo by Ben Merk (ANEFO)
Date
Source GaHetNa (Nationaal Archief NL)
Author Ben Merk (ANEFO)


I would like to upload a cropped version of this picture in which only Maharishi appears and then use it on Wikipedia. Would you agree? Cordially--Am Ator (talk) 22:08, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

No problem at all. I now extracted this file -but you could try to use some of the other photographs of the Maharishi Yogi in the same collection, and upload or extract some yourself! Vysotsky (talk) 00:35, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Thank you Vysotsky for your prompt answer. I was not aware of the full collection. You are right it seems even better and particularly the very last picture would the best. Just to be cropped as a portrait. I am good in cropping but I am not sure I will be experienced enough to do the actual upload on Commons :-) (added by User:Am Ator)
Just try. It is fun to discover, try and succeed. Trial and error brings you to a next level. If you fail or wonder how it works, just let me know and I will happily assist you. Vysotsky (talk) 11:38, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your kind help. We'll see if I made it well - probably the name of the file is too long. Wish you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! --Am Ator (talk) 15:03, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
My pleasure. You did great. I added the name of the photographer to the description & categories, because I always like to give credit to the artists. Vysotsky (talk) 23:34, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
I am not sure that I "did great": I got a message on my discussion page: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Am_Ator#.7B.7BAutotranslate.7C1.3DFile:Maharishi_Mahesh_Yogi_.281st_Sept_1967_in_Amsterdam_by_Merk_Ben_from_Nationaal_Archief.29.jpg.7Cbase.3DImage_license.2Fheading.7D.7D
You advise would be welcomed - what to do now? (I don't really have the mind for these kinds of complicated things)...--Am Ator (talk) 15:00, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Don't worry. This was already fixed yesterday, when I added the complete license (CC-BY-3.0) and source to the image's description. You can sit back and relax. Vysotsky (talk) 15:19, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks once again! I "sit back and relax!" --Am Ator (talk) 22:05, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Elsschot

Is there anyone who knows why I (technically) can't upload this photograph from the collection of Letterenhuis Antwerpen to Wikimedia Commons? It is a photograph of Willem Elsschot from ca. 1920 from an unknown photographer, so clearly Public Domain, to my best knowledge. Vysotsky (talk) 02:15, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Tree after Pierre Alechinsky; poem by Yves Bonnefoy. Rue Descartes, Paris July 2015.jpg

 
File:Tree after Pierre Alechinsky; poem by Yves Bonnefoy. Rue Descartes, Paris July 2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Remi Mathis (talk) 17:10, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

A short question if I may

Dear Vysotsky, A friend would allow me to upload a picture that he has on flickr.com. It is licensed on Creative Commons under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ Is it okay to upload it? I have a doubt since it mentions that "You may not use the material for commercial purposes."??? Awaiting for your kind answer, cordially, --Am Ator (talk) 21:15, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Dear Am Ator, Unfortunately NC means non-commercial, so you are not allowed to upload the picture to Commons. You could ask your friend to change the license of this picture on Flickr to CC-BY. Vysotsky (talk) 23:02, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Dear Vysotsky thank you for your answer. I had this impression but I am not so good in all this juridical things that is why I felt like taking your advise in order not to do some upload which would be deleted after... Have a great day!--Am Ator (talk) 09:26, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:TimKrabbéBoekenweekgeschenk2009.jpg

This media has been deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | hrvatski | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Tiếng Việt | +/−


 
A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:TimKrabbéBoekenweekgeschenk2009.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial ( ), No derivative works ( ), or All Rights Reserved ( ), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as   (CC BY),     (CC BY-SA) or   (CC0) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Ww2censor (talk) 00:37, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Grave of HPN Muller.jpg

বাংলা | Deutsch | English | Español | Bahasa Indonesia | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Português | svenska | 中文 | +/−


Hello! Thank you for uploading File:Grave of HPN Muller.jpg to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

File:GSevenster.jpg

 
File:GSevenster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Natuur12 (talk) 20:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

File:WybrenElgersma.jpg

 
File:WybrenElgersma.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ronn (talk) 00:47, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

File:JoopZwart1960.jpg

 
File:JoopZwart1960.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:30, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

File:UiltjeDeJong.jpg

 
File:UiltjeDeJong.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:30, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

File:AnneFrankSchoolPhoto.jpg

 
File:AnneFrankSchoolPhoto.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Josve05a (talk) 00:20, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Jan Foudraine?

Hoi Vysotsky, ik heb je bedankje gezien. En twijfel bij JFoudraine1975.jpg lijkt me inderdaad op z'n plaats. Op andere foto's is een bredere neus te zien, bijvoorbeeld hier en hier. Daar zie ik eerder gelijkenis met de persoon helemaal links op de 'donorfoto' DemoBoekovskiAmsterdam1975.jpg (die met de stropdas).
N.B. het plaatje heb je zojuist verwijderd bij het NL artikel over Foudraine zelf, maar hij staat nog wel in diverse andere artikelen (zie "File usage on other wikis"). Apdency (talk) 18:15, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Zelfs dat Foudraine helemaal niet op de donorfoto voorkomt hou ik voor mogelijk. Op DemoBoekovski1975.jpg zie je iemand met nogal zware wenkbrauwen (de man vóór het bord "Wij eisen vrijlating van Boekovski"), die had Foudraine ook. En de man daar draagt iets om z'n nek dat wellicht verband houdt met oosterse spiritualiteit, dat zou ook goed in het plaatje passen. Apdency (talk) 18:39, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Ik had de foto nog in diverse kranten nagezocht, en daar werd Foudraine in het onderschrift genoemd -ook bij de foto waar de man met het witte baardje niet op staat. Maar het lijkt er op dat de man met het donkere sikje in elk geval niet Foudraine is. Ik vraag of JFoudraine1975.jpg verwijderd kan worden. De man met het witte baardje zou mogelijk Foudraine kunnen zijn, maar laten we wachten met die toeschrijving tot dat 100% zeker is. Vysotsky (talk) 21:23, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
OK. Ik heb in de Nederlandse kroeg ook een vraag hierover gesteld. Apdency (talk) 16:55, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Zie de overlegpagina van Jan Foudraine. Vysotsky (talk) 08:16, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

File:GoudenKalfNFF.jpg

 
File:GoudenKalfNFF.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Grand-Duc (talk) 00:12, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Wendingen1928tenKlooster.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Wendingen1928tenKlooster.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:23, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:LindaDeMol2012.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:LindaDeMol2012.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:LindaDeMol2012.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ariadacapo (talk) 07:11, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Eysinga.jpg

 
File:Eysinga.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Josve05a (talk) 16:25, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

File:KarlEberhardSchongarth.jpg

 
File:KarlEberhardSchongarth.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Diannaa (talk) 01:40, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Category:NIOD collections

Voor uw info: Lege cat, het zal worden verwijderd. Groeten, --Achim (talk) 17:47, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

File:WesterborkLageplan.jpg

 
File:WesterborkLageplan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gouwenaar (talk) 20:54, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Re:Please stop

Commons:Overcategorization Cathy Richards (talk) 21:27, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

rest of the discussion Vysotsky (talk) 00:05, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Still

Hoi, ik zag je foto van Ahmet Polat, een still van Vorsten TV op YouTube. Op grond waarvan kies je voor de licentie CC-BY-SA? Misschien zie ik iets over het hoofd.. New Skool Media, de club achter Vorsten, is nogal strikt wat copyright betreft. Gr. Ronn (talk) 23:49, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Beste Ronn, De opgegeven licentie op YouTube -door VorstenTV zelf- is Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed). Remix this video. (Te zien door te klikken op Show more). Is een andere CC-licentie een betere vertaling? Vysotsky (talk) 23:56, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Ha, dat had ik inderdaad over het hoofd gezien. Het verbaast me, gezien alle restricties van de organisatie op hun site. Bij die omschrijving op YouTube past m.i. de licentie CC-BY. Ronn (talk) 12:22, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Je hebt

een dubbele cat gecreiert, en had beter het tl creator meeverschuifd en een cat redirect aangelegt.--Oursana (talk) 09:16, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Apologies if I caused any inconvenience. There are two persons named Arnold Hendrik Koning, so the addition of the years is needed to make the disambiguation clear between Arnold Hendrik Koning (1860-1945) and Arnold Hendrik Koning (1784-1850). Perhaps best to make the plain Arnold Hendrik Koning a disambiguation page? Vysotsky (talk) 09:41, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Photo requests in Amsterdam

Hi! Do you do photo requests in Amsterdam? WhisperToMe (talk) 02:59, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Yep (if you are not in a hurry) Vysotsky (talk) 10:57, 25 September 2016 (UTC) Vysotsky (talk) 10:57, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

There's no rush! Anyway I have the following requests:
  • Meidi-Ya Amsterdam (Japanese grocery store), Beethoven.Straat 18-20 1077 JG Amsterdam. The Netherlands.
  • Japanese School of Amsterdam: Karel Klinkenbergstraat 137, 1061AL Amsterdam
  • Lycée Vincent van Gogh Amsterdam: Rustenburgerstraat 246 1073 GK AMSTERDAM (NL)
  • British School of Amsterdam:
    • Nursery & Early Years: Anthonie van Dijckstraat 1a Amsterdam, 1077ME
    • Infant School: Jan van Eijckstraat 21, 1077 LG Amsterdam
    • Junior & Senior School : Fred. Roeskestraat 94a, 1076 ED Amsterdam
  • Russian trade representative building in Amsterdam at Veluwelaan 22, 1079 RA Amsterdam
  • Ahold Head office, Piet Heinkade 167-173 1019 GM Amsterdam The Netherlands - Map
Thank you!
WhisperToMe (talk) 11:03, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Clear. Thanks for the complete addresses. Vysotsky (talk) 11:53, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
You're welcome! If I have any more I'll add them to the list :) - If you go to the Hague I can give you places from there too WhisperToMe (talk) 12:00, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
The Hague is even easier. Vysotsky (talk) 12:00, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Great! In that case I'll add those too
WhisperToMe (talk) 12:07, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Nationaal Archief

Thanks for fixing this upload. Please have a look through my contributions; there will be about a dozen uploads from the Nationaal Archief over two or three days. Problem is that I can't read Dutch, so I'm flying blind. Schwede66 18:23, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Done. Your uploads: nice amount of pics. Nice pics too. Metadata of the Anefo photographs were OK, apart from small things. I especially care about the names of the photographers. Vysotsky (talk) 19:57, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

File:AFTh1988.jpg

 
File:AFTh1988.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Goesseln (talk) 22:50, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

File:OrnsteinHulshoffPol1933.jpg

 
File:OrnsteinHulshoffPol1933.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:07, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

File:GroeneveltKroese.jpg

 
File:GroeneveltKroese.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

47.150.70.205 23:54, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Category:Writers from the Netherlands

Hi,

Ik zag dat je net een bestand in deze cat hebt geplaatst. Iemand heeft eerder vandaag zonder overleg deze hele cat overgegooid naar Category:Writers from the Netherlands to be categorised by name zonder te kijken of het nuttig is om bepaalde foto's op naam te sorteren. Mocht je je afvragen waarom die hele categorie bijna leeg is. Natuur12 (talk) 14:36, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Ik zag het ook. Deze foto past toch in die nu vrijwel lege categorie, omdat er allemaal niet-te-identificeren schrijvers op staan. Ik hoop dat de leegmaker ook die 470 categorieën van schrijvers aan gaat maken, anders is het een zinloze actie geweest. Vysotsky (talk) 14:41, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Writers to be categorised by name

Please note I did not create this type of category (existing before for Russia, Ukraine...). I believe theese categories are discussed. So I am waiting the decision. Best. 16:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC) (Previous message was posted by User:Palamède)

Deleted content

Afrikaans | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | हिन्दी | magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | svenska | українська | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−


Hello Vysotsky/Archive,

the following content you uploaded is not free and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Microwave timer.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files which can be used for any purpose, including:

  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload works you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:30, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Wendingen

Hallo Vysotsky, Drie Wendingen op commons gezet: Dudok 1924-8 (gest. 1974) / Finsterlin 1924-3 (gest. 1973) / Frank Lloyd Wright, Wijdeveld (gest. 1987). Probleem bij Dudok omdat hij nog geen 70 jaar dood is. Waarschijnlijk verdwijnen alle drie Wendingen weer. Is er misschien een oplossing ertegen. De groeten, Leuk2, 14:11, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Beste Leuk2, Helaas vermoed ik dat er geen andere oplossing is dan afwachten. Ik heb alle omslagen van Wendingen een jaar geleden stuk voor stuk doorgenomen en op auteursrecht gecontroleerd. Alle afbeeldingen die in 2016 in het publiek domein vielen, heb ik ingebracht in Wikimedia Commons. Ik heb een lijstje van de overige afbeeldingen, gesorteerd op het jaar van overlijden van de auteur. De eerste afbeelding valt vrij in 2019, daarna één in 2025 en zo verder. De Nederlandse auteurswet is streng (maar wel rechtvaardig voor de nabestaanden van creatievelingen). Vysotsky (talk) 12:59, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Beste Vysotsky, Bedankt voor de belangrijke informatie. Wendingen (1918) staat nog altijd ver terug ten opzichte van De Stijl (1917), ook bij de bezoekers van Wikipedia. De groeten, Leuk2, 17:11, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Beste Leuk2, Ach, van Stijl-kunstenaars als Gerrit Rietveld, Bart van der Leck en Vilmos Huszár is ook nog maar weinig van het echte werk beschikbaar op Wiki. Beschikbaarheid staat gelukkig niet gelijk aan kwaliteit. Bovendien zijn de omslagen van Wendingen op andere plekken goed te vinden. Vysotsky (talk) 15:59, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Beste Vysotsky, Bij Deletion requests heb ik een voorstel gedaan, om alle Wendingen zonder copyright als FAIR USE te kunnen publiceren (formaat 65X65mm, low-resolutie, van hier uit verdere links). Wendingen heb ik als buitenlander leren kennen tijdens het schrijven van een artikel voor een architectuurtijdschrift. Zelf heb ik een stapel Wendingen gehad, die net verkocht zijn door veilingen. Dat b.v. de omslagen van Wijdeveld (o.a. Wright, Mendelsohn, Gray etc.) pas in 2057 gepubliceerd kunnen worden is jammer. - Volgens "Revision history" heeft u zeer veel gedaan voor Wendingen. Het zou enorm gewaardeerd worden als u met uw ervaring een FAIR USE tot stand zou brengen voor alle resterende Wendingen zonder copyright. Wendingen en de Amsterdamse School werden lange tijd verguisd door de architectenelite, ook aan de TU Delft. Het archief van Piet Kramer - 2de man van de Amsterdamse School - werd in 1961 verbrand. Deze wanverhouding is gedeeltelijk ook vandaag nog te zien. De dagelijkse bezoekers bij Wikipedia zijn: Wendingen (20), De Stijl (2137). Misschien kunt u meehelpen, hier verbetering aan te brengen. Een voorbeeld van FAIR USE is te zien bij het artikel "Structuralism (architecture)": File:Tokyo Bay Plan by Tange 1960.jpg, georganiseerd door User:Elekhh. De groeten Leuk2, 13:34, 1 mei 2017 (UTC)

Beste Leuk2, Persoonlijk ben ik erg gecharmeerd van Fair use, en ik zou graag willen dat alle auteursrechtwetgeving identiek was, maar dat is niet zo. Dat betekent dat je afbeeldingen afzonderlijk zou moeten gaan inbrengen in de Engelse, Chinese en Russische (etc.) Wikipedia, en dat die afbeeldingen niet geaccepteerd worden in de meeste andere taalversies. Wellicht heb je zelf zin om de door jou ingebrachte afbeeldingen over te brengen van Commons naar bijv. de Engelse Wikipedia, maar ik ga dat niet doen. Ook andere actie in Commons zelf is in dit opzicht -naar ik vrees- trekken aan een dood paard. Ondertussen hoop ik op enige versoepeling van de auteursrechtwetgeving (wellicht in Europa, bijv. tot 10 jaar na de dood van de auteur), met blijvend respect voor de creatievelingen. Vysotsky (talk) 12:10, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Writers from the Netherlands by type

Sorry and thanks.Palamède (talk) 10:20, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

File:SminiaPol2006.jpg

 
File:SminiaPol2006.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Paul B (talk) 19:27, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Category:Photographs by J.P.A. Antonietti

Beste Vysotsky,

Sorry dat ik de indeling van deze fotocollectie binnen Category:Images from the Rijksdienst voor het Cultureel Erfgoed weghaalde (ik dacht even dat ik die zelf had aangebracht;-). Maar het algemene punt is dat Images from the Rijksdienst voor het Cultureel Erfgoed eigenlijk geen subcategorieën zou moeten hebben: bij instellingen (musea, bibliotheken..) is Images from... meestal een vergaarbak waar alle foto's maar eenmaal in voor zouden moeten komen, om een overzicht te hebben en tellers en massale bewerkingen in een klap op los te kunnen laten. Dat Antonietti in dienst was bij RCE is niet het punt, want de fotografen en hun foto's hebben hier terecht al hun categorie in Category:Rijksdienst voor het Cultureel Erfgoed, dus Photographs of ... als subcategorie onder Images from... is eigenlijk tweemaal dubbelop. Multichill is er abusievelijk mee begonnen geloof ik... Ik laat RCE voorlopig verder met rust, wilde even helpen met afstompend werk. (Ik heb nog zat on- of slechtgeïdentificeerde Indiase tempels van het KITLV waar niemand anders aan toekomt.) Vriendelijke groet, Hansmuller (talk) 16:48, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Slimste Mens 2016.jpg

 
File:Slimste Mens 2016.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 12:55, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 17:01, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

still Van Toorenburg

Hoi Vysotsky, zag je afbeelding MadeleineVanToorenburg2016.jpg. Je geeft het een 4.0 licentie. Maar hoe weet je dat de still vrij te publiceren is? Het is toch een onderdeel van een tv-programma waarop auteursrechten rusten? Alvast bedankt voor je reactie! Happytravels (talk) 16:20, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Beste HappyTravels, Ik dacht dat het filmpje was vrijgegeven op een officieel kanaal van de Publieke Omroep, waarvan op YouTube ook het logo gebruikt werd. Het lijkt er op dat dat niet zo is. Ik heb de afbeelding zojuist zelf voorgedragen voor verwijdering. Dank voor de attendering. Vysotsky (talk) 20:19, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

File:ProtaisMpiranya.jpg

 
File:ProtaisMpiranya.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DS (talk) 20:50, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

To be very clear, the US State Dep't has uploaded a bunch of Rwandan ID document photographs without properly denoting their provenance. Those are not PD-USGOV, even though the State Dep't says they are. It's license washing - accidental, but license washing nonetheless. Please be very careful with your Rwandan war criminal uploads. DS (talk) 20:53, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
"Please note that many photos used on this website are copyrighted. Only State Department photos are in the public domain." DS (talk) 21:11, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

File:StordiauVanEgmonABD.jpg

Hallo, Vysotsky, is de volledige naam "Anne-Marie Stordiau-van Egmond", zo ja kan ik dit aanpassen in de beschrijving.  Lotje (talk) 06:57, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Volgens eigen opgave soms met en soms zonder streepje. Meest voorkomend: met streepje. Ik heb het zelf aangepast; dank voor de attendering. Vysotsky (talk) 08:20, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Flickr2Commons

I have just come across a few images you have recently uploaded from Flickr. I would appreciate it if in the future, you used the Flickr2Commons tool. This tool allows images to be moved to Commons from Flickr without having to download the images to your own computer. It also brings in the largest resolution of the image, as well making sure to list the correct license and url, making it easy for the automated Flickr Review system. Also, it is fairly easy to categorize images with this tool. Elisfkc (talk) 15:27, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. Vysotsky (talk) 15:31, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

File:ErichSalomon.jpg

 
File:ErichSalomon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mutter Erde (talk) 08:25, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Flickr2Commons

I have just come across a few images you have recently uploaded from Flickr. I would appreciate it if in the future, you used the Flickr2Commons tool. This tool allows images to be moved to Commons from Flickr without having to download the images to your own computer. It also brings in the largest resolution of the image, as well making sure to list the correct license and url, making it easy for the automated Flickr Review system. Also, it is fairly easy to categorize images with this tool. Elisfkc (talk) 15:27, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. Vysotsky (talk) 15:31, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

File:ErichSalomon.jpg

 
File:ErichSalomon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mutter Erde (talk) 08:25, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Male and female

Dear E4024, Please read: this discussion about categories comprising females. After reading, I think you will understand why it is very illogical to create these categories. Vysotsky (talk) 12:02, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Late harvest. I mean late reply: I still do not think it the way you prefer me to do. Have a good week-end. --E4024 (talk) 12:18, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

YouTube stillframes

Hey, the {{YouTube}} can be used for stills from YouTube videos. They are CC-BY 3.0, not CC-BY-SA 4.0.. YouTube videos can easily be transferred to Wikimedia Commons throught the Video2Commons tool on cloud services--Vera (talk) 11:24, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Gracias. Vysotsky (talk) 21:50, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

File:GeorgKrugers.jpg

 
File:GeorgKrugers.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 07:52, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Usage of ANEFO images (Dutch National Archives) in Wiki tops #90,000

 
ANEFO logo

Dutch National Archives (Nationaal Archief) have made well over 320,000 images from the photograph press agency Anefo available under a CC-0 license –from 2012 onwards. These images form a set of photographs from the Netherlands (and abroad!) covering the period 1945-1989. Dutch National Archives announced this gesture (and performed the action) in 2012, made images available in high resolution in 2015 and changed the license to CC-zero in 2017. All photographs are available at the website of the Nationaal Archief.
More than 17,000 images have been uploaded to Wikimedia Commons so far (Nov. 2017), and usage is stunning. Not all images have been categorized properly, but a first search with a wmflabs tool shows 17,036 distinct images present in Commons (d.d. 17 Nov.2017), of which 11,282 (66.22% of all images in this category) are now being used in dozens of language versions of Wikipedia –with high usage in Wikidata too. Total image usages in Wiki have just surpassed 90,000.

 
ANeFo logo 1953
Site Images used
en.wikipedia 27261
nl.wikipedia 10470
wikidata.wikipedia 6430
de.wikipedia 5221
es.wikipedia. 5074
fr.wikipedia 4329
it.wikipedia 2952
ru.wikipedia 2195
pl.wikipedia 2049
no.wikipedia 1383
pt.wikipedia 1340
ca.wikipedia 1150
hu.wikpedia 1027
& others
Total image usages 90009
Distinct images used 11282 (66.22%)

File:WertheimSalomonsonGeorgineSchwartze.jpg

 
File:WertheimSalomonsonGeorgineSchwartze.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

B dash (talk) 09:13, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Stanz1945.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Stanz1945.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Stanz1945.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ManFromNord (talk) 11:45, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

  • Only pictures with the cc-0 logo are available to use. --ManFromNord (talk) 11:48, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

File renaming

Hi, Vysotsky, since you were the uploader of File:Renterghem1945.jpg and File:Stanz1945.jpg, I was wondering if something could be done with the description of these images. Looking to the comment on the Stanz1945 file, I am pretty sure both files should be renamed once someone found out when exactly they have been made. I would not be surprised if both (and maybe many more...) were the subject of the "posing" for a serial/documentary? related to the Dutch resistance. What is your opinion? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 15:04, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Dear Lotje, Thanks for your comment. Both photos were made in August 1945, and are part of the RVD Collection (Rijksvoorlichtingsdienst). The photos were made by different photographers, resp. Fritz Kahlenberg and Charles Breijer. The photographs were apparently made to "document" certain aspects of the Dutch resistance, and are clearly made after the war ended. I see no reason for renaming the photographs. Vysotsky (talk) 12:12, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

File:BeatrixRuf2015.jpg

 
File:BeatrixRuf2015.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

xplicit 11:49, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Uploads of User:ATX-NL

Hi, in cases were the source is non-free, please use 'report copyright violation' instead of removing the license template. Removing the license will cause a bot to add it to Category:Media without a license: needs history check, after which somebody will tag it as copyvio. Jcb (talk) 22:06, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

File:LeysenDavignon2011.gif

 
File:LeysenDavignon2011.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 09:51, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Delden15.JPG

Hallo Vysotsky, ik zou de file graag hernoemen en tevens de beschrijving aanpassen. Het lijkt me meer een échte wandelbrug met al die trappen. Wat dacht je van File:Twickel - verbindingsbrug over rondweg of had je een andere suggestie? :) Lotje (talk) 13:37, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Ga je gang. Met fietsbrug bedoelde ik dat er aan elke kant een fietssleuf zit. Vysotsky (talk) 13:40, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
  Done Ondertussen heb ik ook wat bijgeleerd i.v.m. fietssleuven en hellingbruggen. Bedankt! Lotje (talk) 12:14, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:AnniekPheifer2012.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:AnniekPheifer2012.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:AnniekPheifer2012.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Smooth O (talk) 13:46, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:ThomasLeysen2011.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:ThomasLeysen2011.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Edoderoo (talk) 17:33, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Original (gif file) passed FlickrLicenseReview, but was replaced by a jpg version. FlickrReview of this file (extract of the original) was checked by User:Elisfkc on 29 Nov. 2017. Vysotsky (talk) 22:33, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Flickr might have this license, but it looks like it is a picture taken from a tv-screen, and therefor it is a derivative work. And most likely a copyright violation too. Also on Flickr it is actually a violation, is my expectation. Edoderoo (talk) 21:26, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Don't think so. If you look at the complete Flickr set, you see this podium up front in the dining room, including these specific chairs -just 3 photos down. Vysotsky (talk) 21:37, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Xmas

 
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year
Vysotsky, ...

Lotje (talk) 05:42, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:JorisMarseille2015.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:JorisMarseille2015.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

JuTa 12:49, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

I added the tag {{LicenseReview}} myself. If one follows the link, one finds a YouTube video with a Creative Commons license. Vysotsky (talk) 12:54, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

User contributions

Proficiat Vysotsky! Van harte.   Lotje (talk) 16:14, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Merci. Uiteindelijk gaat het natuurlijk niet om de kwanti-, maar om de kwaliteit. Zojuist heb ik veel plezier beleefd: een keer of 40 heeft een artikeltje over Boris Pasternak nu een gezicht gekregen, van de Basjkierse via de Kantonese tot de Mingrelische Wikpedia. Kijk, daar steekt een mens toch weer wat van op. Vysotsky (talk) 16:56, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

File:VdStaaij2016.jpg

 
File:VdStaaij2016.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Woodcutterty (talk) 19:54, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Image without license

File:KeesvanderStaaijDirkHol2016.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 21:33, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

For Your Information

See this: COM:WHERE LICENSE

For Youtube, you can type {{Youtube}} which is CC BY 3.0 Goodbye, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:15, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

File:DamiaanDenys2013.jpg

This screencap does not appear at 6:30 min. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:14, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

You are right. Still was taken at 5:36 min. Thanx, Vysotsky (talk) 12:15, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Image passed. I relicensed it to {{Youtube}} . Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:27, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

File:LilianHelder.jpg

 
File:LilianHelder.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: YouTube-channel does not have any rights on this image, we should not publish it under cc-by-sa either
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Edoderoo (talk) 09:10, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

File:LilianHelder.jpg

 
File:LilianHelder.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Elly (talk) 23:14, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Hoi V, sorry ik krijg je naam niet zonder spelfouten uit mijn mobiele telefoon.... Jij hebt deze foto ter goede trouw uit het filmpje geknipt, maar ik denk dat het filmpje uit commerciële niet vrije delen is opgebouwd. Vandaar het verwijdervoorstel. We zijn op OTRS in gesprek over een mogelijk betere foto. Hopelijk komt dat tot een goed einde. Met vriendelijke groet, Elly (talk) 08:17, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Stadsarchief Amsterdam, Afb 010179000244.jpg

Hi, I restored this file. Please fill in the missing information. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:25, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
  Done Vysotsky (talk) 11:27, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Defaultsort

Hi Vysotsky, thanks for adding DEFAULTSORT to some of the cats taht I´ve moved to "women by name" - I hadn´t noticed they were missing, most of the categories for German politicians are usually complete. I´ll check the other categories of that bunch tomorrow and fix the other missing templates. --Rudolph Buch (talk) 23:02, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! Vysotsky (talk) 10:41, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Hans Clevers.jpg

 
File:Hans Clevers.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Larger file available at Flickr but with an incompatible license
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 12:30, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Tuuk1.jpg

Hallo, Vysotsky zou die file kunnen hernoemd worden? er zijn nogal wat tuuks... Ik overweeg ook de afbeelding in de infobox van Petronella Lenting te plaatsen, t.t.z. wanneer met aan zekerheid grenzende waarschijnlijkheid kan worden aangenomen dat het inderdaad de moeder van Titia van der Tuuk is.   Lotje (talk) 14:48, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Bedankt, en deze ook? Lotje (talk) 15:10, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
  Done Vysotsky (talk) 23:20, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Upload probs

Hallo Vysotsky, reading the logs I just noticed that you have had problems. They were caused by the use of URL shorteners like flic.kr on file pages. Please use the expanded links instead, so this prob shouldn't occur. Groeten, --Achim (talk) 14:36, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanx! Vysotsky (talk) 15:25, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

File:SlicherVanBathWattel1974.jpg

 
File:SlicherVanBathWattel1974.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

MichellevanLanschot (talk) 15:43, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Wattel.jpg

 
File:Wattel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

MichellevanLanschot (talk) 15:43, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Category:Candidates Tournament 1968

There is something wrong with this category: There was no candidates tournament in 1968. Steak (talk) 20:03, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

There were several matches in different cities leading up to Spassky beating Korchnoi 6,5-3,5 (Sept. 1968) and then meeting Petrosian. See Torneio de Candidatos de 1968 (Wiki-PT) and Матчи претендентов 1968 (Wiki-RU). Vysotsky (talk) 07:53, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Ok. I removed the links pointing to wrong wikipedia articles. Steak (talk) 09:10, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Bijzondere Rechtspleging

Hallo, Vysotsky, er zijn nogal wat foto's van de hand van Carel Blazer in het "Tribunaal Bijzondere Rechtspleging" met een schat aan informatie... Denk je dat het zinvol is deze in een catagory onder te brengen? :) Lotje (talk) 04:17, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Beste Lotje, Een aparte categorie? Het lijkt het meest logisch om alle 26 (23 van Blazer) foto's te plaatsen in [[Category:Collaborators with Axis occupation from the Netherlands]]. Vysotsky (talk) 07:49, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
Dat is een uitstekend idee. Bedankt! :) Lotje (talk) 13:22, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

GMIIUPLDR files

I can probably help you with the GMIIUPLDR files. Will still be able to use your help. Just a heads up before you spend more time on this than needed. - Alexis Jazz 16:58, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanx! Vysotsky (talk) 07:36, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Alexis_Jazz If you start on top of Special:ListFiles/GMIIUPLDR, I'll begin from below. Vysotsky (talk) 21:39, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
I meant more like, I can make it a little easier. Just a sec. - Alexis Jazz 21:45, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
https://mega.nz/#!FFQFTSAJ!e2BKgq1VwXAZKzYAIJEzY3Uhe8RjXUQwbgAPeSIoHYQ let me know if you experience any problems. - Alexis Jazz 22:59, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
https://mega.nz/#!UE5jmapZ!ET8RERMo8BcMvg1n7OhP0T7qttO0OGc4aUZYhvEnybc may be slightly easier to work with. - Alexis Jazz 23:04, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Duplicate files

Goodmorning Vysotsky, you tagged File:Zaak Magere Josje (1959).jpg as being a duplicate of File:Rechtszaak Magere Josje publieke belangstelling, Bestanddeelnr 910-8331.jpg. Within hours it was deleted by an administrator. However, File:Zaak Magere Josje (1959).jpg is a processed image. Scratches and dirt were removed and the image was slightly rotated clockwise and cropped. Could you please be more careful in determining wether an image is a duplicate or not. The deletion process is rather quick-and-dirty, I mean administrators usually do not check whether the tag is valid preceding the deletion. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 08:12, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for remarking. You are right. I have indeed tagged dozens of photographs from the Category:Images from Anefo as duplicates, and will continue to do so, for several reasons: since the mass upload of images from Nationaal Archief by User:Mr.Nostalgic to Commons (325k!), images are now available in higher resolution & better contrast, with correct free (CC-zero) license and (often) better descriptions and archival inventory numbers. I try to be as careful as possible (e.g. transferring categories and descriptions in other languages) and not to tag processed images as duplicates. I usually tag these processed images as cropped or extracted images. My experience with administrators is that they do check the validity of the tagging. This one must have slipped through. Vysotsky (talk) 08:34, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Vrijwillig Vrouwen Hulp Korps (VVHK)

Hallo Vysotsky, er staan nogal wat afbeeldingen van het Vrouwen Hulp Korps, heb jij een voorstel welke category geschikt is? Category:Vrijwillig Vrouwen Hulpkorps (VVHK) of Category:Vrijwillig Vrouwen Hulp Korps of misschien iets anders? Bedankt. Lotje (talk) 12:40, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Good question, but luckily the category is present: Category:Vrijwillig Vrouwen Hulpkorps. I added two parent categories. Vysotsky (talk) 12:50, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks Vysotsky, I found out in the meantime, the problem was with the spelling in Dutch.
BTW, this remark is like saying the Fotocollectie Anefo is a waste of time and energy... Not that I will react to that comment (!) there are, as we all know, far too many articles on the different wikipedia who are not educational at all and out of scope. For example, sports related articles might imho be more suitable on a sports.wikipedia then where they are now!   Lotje (talk) 13:32, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Short article about 325.000 recent additions of the Anefo collection to Wikimedia Commons. Vysotsky (talk) 08:44, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Overleg:Van Heel I did my bit. Lotje (talk) 14:14, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

De Meervaart

Only me again, Dikke Vrouwen Dag in Meervaart Amsterdam, is that the location you think? Lotje (talk) 13:38, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Yes, Category:De Meervaart (Amsterdam). Vysotsky (talk) 08:37, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
  Done Thanks! Lotje (talk) 12:54, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

thanks

for all the marvelous duplicates to deal with - amazing to read and see the descriptions - I am almost in an age where the photos 'ring bells' so to speak - some of the photos really evoke a lost world. Thanks. JarrahTree (talk) 13:41, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

My pleasure. Thanks are immediately passed on to the Anefo photographers, Dutch National Archives and User:Mr.Nostalgic. Vysotsky (talk) 16:06, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
What an astonishing project - the generosity and persistent dedication is an inspiration !! JarrahTree (talk) 23:21, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Kenyan independence, 1967?

Hello, could you please explain this edit. I am looking at en:Kenya and independence is actually listed as 1963, 2 years before original 1965 and 4 years before your version of 1967. Am I missing something? Gone Postal (talk) 18:57, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Apologies. Wrongly understood. Made undone. Vysotsky (talk) 18:59, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Ok, no problem. Now I only need to understand why the original says 1965 and not 1963. Gone Postal (talk) 19:01, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

File:RuitingaValsuam.jpg

 
File:RuitingaValsuam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

SIryn (talk) 09:18, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi Vysotsky, deze afbeelding verwijder ik in het opdracht van Stichting Academisch Erfgoed. De volgende stap is de publiek domein afbeeldingen uit deze afbeeldingen set uit CN weer terugplaatsen op Commons. Dat komt er binnenkort aan. Ik houd je op de hoogte. SIryn (talk) 09:20, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Pictoright

Hoi Vysotsky, bij het checken van de licentie van File:Het 5-delige schilderij 'Blauw Wit Rood', 1967.jpg viel het me (nu pas??) op dat er sprake is van Pictoright 2014 (zie hier op europeana.eu). Ben jij dat al eerder tegen gekomen, en weet je of dat al dan niet consequenties heeft voor de vrijgave van zulk werk op Wikimedia Commons? Er schijnt meer van dergelijk werk onder dezelfde conditie aanwezig te zijn, en dat kan interessant zijn!? -- Mdd (talk) 11:48, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Beste Mdd, Nee, dat heb ik nooit eerder gezien. En er staat een duidelijke CC-BY-melding bij deze afbeelding, dus degene die die Pictoright-melding er bij zette, zou toch ook hebben moeten zien? Vysotsky (talk) 11:59, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) @Mdd: zie hier:

Je verwart Stichting BREIN namelijk met Buma/Stemra.

Nu is dat op zich niet zo gek want deze twee toko's zitten samen met CEDAR B.V., Stichting De Thuiskopie, Stichting Leenrecht, Stichting Lira, Stichting PRO, Stichting Reprorecht, Stichting VEVAM, Vereniging voor Auteursrecht* (VvA) en Stichting Beheer Rechten Fingerprint Database allen op of rond de Siriusdreef in Hoofddorp.

Was je eigenlijk op zoek naar Stichting NORMA, Stichting SEKAM, DuPho/Fotografen Federatie, Stichting Pictoright of StOPnl (Stichting onafhankelijke Producenten Nederland) dan moet je postcode 1018 in Amsterdam intoetsen in je GPS.

Deze lijst is niet uitputtend, maar nu weet je ongeveer hoe het zit. Deze fout dus niet meer maken!

*"De Vereniging voor Auteursrecht (VvA) houdt zich bezig met de studie van het auteursrecht en aanverwante onderwerpen en is een vrije wetenschappelijke vereniging." Vrij, wetenschappelijk en zonder vooroordeel. Ik geloof het onmiddelijk.

w:nl:Pictoright. Vermoedelijk is het geen probleem. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:55, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Dat denk ik ook niet. Pictoright is een hele aardige club voor erfgoedinstellingen:

Vysotsky (talk) 23:07, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Ah, fraai. Maar dan begrijp ik dat Europeana dus wel die connectie met Pictoright heeft? Dan is het voornaamste risico dat een auteur weigert zich aan te sluiten bij Pictoright. Pictoright lijkt dan niet eens zo'n heel erge oplossing, alleen zou er eigenlijk wel geregeld moeten worden dat rechthebbenden het uit moeten vechten met (in dit geval) Pictoright en niet met het archief. (maar daar hebben wij helaas geen invloed op) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:05, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Bedankt, de vermelding "Pictoright 2014" staat dus niet voor (wat ik afhankelijk dacht) een speciale copyright-bepaling, maar kennelijk voor de organisatie die in 2014 betrokken was. De situatie lijkt dus als volgt: Het Museum Het Valkhof is in 2014 met Pictoright overeengekomen om de afbeelding onder een CC.BY.3.0 licentie vrij te geven, waarbij Pictoright voor de kunstenaar optrad.

Verder staat onderaan de betreffende pagina op Europeana dat er 78.113 gelijke objecten zijn (eergisteren waren dit er nog ruim 56.000)... en daar zijn zo te zien vele afbeeldingen van de schilderkunst van toonaangevende hedendaagse Nederlandse kunstenaars bij (waaraan in Wikipedia momenteel een groot gebrek is).

De betreffende links naar conflicten met ergoedinstellingen tonen aan, dat Pictoright een serieuze speler is in de markt. Naast confrontatie met erfgoedinstellingen wijst dit geval uit, dat ze dus ook voorzieningen hebben getroffen voor verspreiding van werk onder CC licentie. Gezien het (groeide ?) nieuwe aanbod op Europeana lijkt het interessant te bekijken of Wikimedia Commons en Wikipedia hier (grootschaliger) gebruikt van kan maken!? -- Mdd (talk) 09:14, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

@Mdd: Ik vraag trouwens wel af hoe het dan zit met de onherroepbaarheid van de Creative Commons licentie. Als het contract met Pictoright afloopt, blijven de afbeeldingen dan beschikbaar? Of gaan ze alle hergebruikers dan aanklagen? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:00, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

hmmm

quality of File:M.A. Muller-van Ast (PvdA) - NL-HaNA Anefo 930-5270 WM345.jpg is bad.... JarrahTree (talk) 15:03, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

True. The original is darker & slightly better. Fortunately we have more photographs of Müller-van Ast. Vysotsky (talk) 15:16, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Category:Moeders voor Moeders

Hallo Vysotsky, hoe zou jij dit aanpakken? Een Category:Moeders voor Moeders (Belgium) en Category:Moeders voor Moeders (Netherlands)? Of heb je een beter idee?   Lotje (talk) 14:02, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Voor zover ik het kan bekijken, lijken het me totaal verschillende organisaties: de Belgische MvM meer een sociale organisatie, de Nederlandse MvM een medische club. Ik ga voorstellen om ze te scheiden. Vysotsky (talk) 15:59, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Bedankt Vysotsky. Lotje (talk) 12:19, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Please don't blank

Hi Vysotsky, thanks for contributing! Please, do not blank empty pages. If you want an empty category to be deleted, add just {{speedy|empty}} on top of the page. The reason is: Blanked pages don't show up in a maintenance category (how should they, containing nothing). In addition, this way the deletion request is done much faster. Groeten, --Achim (talk) 13:58, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanx. Vysotsky (talk) 17:19, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Charl Schwietert 1981 (1).jpg

Hallo Vysotsky, de datum stemt niet overeen met het originee --> 1982l. Zou jij dit corrigeren, file rename bedoel ik. Lotje (talk) 13:59, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

  Done Vysotsky (talk) 17:16, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

File:SchenkeveldHolt1995.jpg

 
File:SchenkeveldHolt1995.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

MichellevanLanschot (talk) 15:18, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

File:SchenkeveldHolt1995.jpg

 
File:SchenkeveldHolt1995.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

MichellevanLanschot (talk) 15:20, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

athletiek --> atletiek

Hallo Vysotsky, die spellingsfout pijnigt mijn ogen. Er zijn er welgeteld 51. Kan jij ze in one go hernoemen (#3)? Bedankt. Lotje (talk) 08:27, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Lotje: niet helemaal "wel"geteld want het waren er meer. (athletiekwedstrijden, athleten, athleet) Alleen de bestandsnamen kan ik niets aan doen. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:19, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Inderdaad, niet helemaal, maar ik had nooit durven hopen dat je ze allemaal zou onderhanden nemen. Bedankt! Lotje (talk) 09:21, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
@Lotje: Crap, nu moet ik de helft (of meer) weer ongedaan maken.. Of minstens alles nalopen.. Oude spelling.. Stom. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:32, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Oei! Lotje (talk) 09:33, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Valt mee. Nog maar 1 die terug moet: AVAC At(h)letiek Club. Aan de bestandsnamen til ik niet zo. Vysotsky (talk) 09:37, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Ik denk dat ik alles nu heb? Of moeten dingen als "NH Atletiekkampioenschappen" ook terug naar "NH Athletiekkampioenschappen"? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:54, 5 July 2018 (UTC)   Done

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Vysotsky,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Bogor Dutch Graveyard 12.jpg

Hallo Vysotsky, zou dit het graf van een Joodse overledene kunnen zijn (vanwege de steentjes)? Lotje (talk) 05:08, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Alles kan, maar ik denk het niet: die steentjes lagen verspreid over het hele kerkhof. Ze waren afkomstig van afbrokkelende stenen. Vysotsky (talk) 05:23, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Okay, bedankt! Lotje (talk) 06:14, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Category:Huwelijk van de heer Hans Smulders met Mary Sevenstern

Hallo Vysotsky, ik heb er een potje van gemaakt. Die category hoorde natuurlijk in het Engels te zijn Category:Marriage of Hans Smulders with Meary Sevenstern, of niet? Graag je advies. Lotje (talk) 14:47, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Als je dat goed vindt, ga ik over een half uurtje iets herstellen. Vysotsky (talk) 20:08, 2 August 2018 (UTC)   Done

File:Corry Vonk en Wim Kan, Bestanddeelnr 902-0559.jpg

@Vysotsky: ik had de Category:Wim Kan toegevoegd, maar ik twijfel plots omdat verder in de tekst Mathieu van Eijsden (Eysden, van, Matthieu) voorkomt. Kan jij uitsluitsle geven en evt. corrigeren? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 15:31, 3 August 2018 (UTC)   Done

Category:Koninklijke Nederlandsche Automobiel Club

@Vysotsky: zou het mogelijk zijn dze in one go onder te brengen in deze (nog aan te maken) category? Lotje (talk) 06:51, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Geen idee. Bots zijn niet mijn sterke kant. Vysotsky (talk) 19:19, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

VEGIN

Hallo Vysotsky, waaronder zouden deze files vallen? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 15:47, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Category:VEGIN   Done
Bedankt! Lotje (talk) 16:32, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Volkshogeschool te Bergen

Hallo Vysotsky heb jij enig idee of de Volkshogeschool te Bergen nog bestaat? Er staan een paar afbeeldingen hier en ik zou ze graag verder gecategoriseerd zien.   Lotje (talk) 13:44, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Dit zal waarschijnlijk dezelfde Hogeschool zijn Lotje (talk) 13:47, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Nee, de Volkshogeschool Bergen bestaat niet meer. Ik maakte deze categorie aan voor die 50 Anefo-foto's: Category:Volkshogeschool Bergen (the Netherlands). Het gebouw (Villa de Zandhoeve) is inmiddels voor de derde keer uitgebreid en heet tegenwoordig Hotel blooming. Vysotsky (talk) 15:02, 7 August 2018 (UTC)   Done
PS Blijkbaar waren er 2 locaties: "De Oude Hof" was aan de Eeuwigelaan 7, Bergen-Binnen (3 foto's hebben expliciet de vermelding "Oude Hof"). 5 km verderop zat "De Zandhoeve", Duinweg 5, Bergen. Vysotsky (talk) 15:20, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Msschien waren er wel een Volkshogeschool voor de heren en een Volkshogeschool voor de dames, ofwel mochten ze toen (nog) niet samen rond de tafel.   Lotje (talk) 16:36, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Nationale Bedevaart uit Maastricht naar Rome - 1950

Hallo Vysotsky hoe zou ik de category hiervan verfijnen? Lotje (talk) 15:14, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Die afbeelding hoort er ook nog bij. :) Lotje (talk) 15:17, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Added two existing categories. Vysotsky (talk) 19:13, 9 August 2018 (UTC)   Done

Jordaanfestival

Hallo Vysotsky, waar zou jij al die Jordaanfestivals onderbrengen? Lotje (talk) 06:05, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Category:Jordaan Festival. I used English spelling. If you add the year in the category (Category:Jordaan Festival|1960) the photographs will be neatly sorted. Vysotsky (talk) 19:20, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Thank you Vysotsky, you are always so helpful, very much appreciated. Lotje (talk) 13:26, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Weismüller, Eduard H.J., Afb 010018000101.jpg

Hallo Vysotsky, kan jij uitsluitsel geven? De handgeschreven tekst onderaan de afbeelding deed me twijfelen. Expertise gevraagd dus.   Lotje (talk) 14:04, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

I assume the address of photographer Eduard Weismüller was at Jacob van Campenstraat 102, Amsterdam. No need to have that as a category here. From the book Dutch Eyes: "In dezelfde tijd [ca.1895] werden in opdracht van de Bouwonderneming Jordaan de woonomstandigheden van de allerarmsten onderzocht. Bij de verslagen die van dit onderzoek werden gemaakt werden foto's van Eduard H.J. Weismüller gevoegd. De fotografie werd voor het eerst gebruikt bij het toezicht op en de regulering van de stad en haar bevolking. In Amsterdam nam de gemeente fotografen in dienst, zij werkten mee aan het proces van woningverbetering dat op gang kwam na de instelling van de Woningwet in 1901, door vooraf de mistanden te fotograferen en vervolgens de vernieuwingen vast te leggen." I will add a category Photographs by Eduard Weismüller. Vysotsky (talk) 19:37, 9 August 2018 (UTC)   Done
This is great work! Ik vroeg me af ... Tweede Jacob van Campenstraat?   Lotje (talk) 13:25, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Grenspost Berg = Bergh

Hallo Vysotsky een paar afbeeldingen "Grenspost Berg", kunnen we dit nog traceren? Rijksweg 15? Lotje (talk) 13:21, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Grenspost Bergh: Category:Border highway A3-A12 Emmerich-Elten - Bergh. Vysotsky (talk) 08:15, 14 August 2018 (UTC)   Done
Ik ga even niet naar nieuwe zaken kijken. Ik ben net klaar met Weismuller. Open staan nog: Jordaan Festival   Done, Bedevaart   Done, Volkshogeschool, KNAC. Help je mee om die foto's te categoriseren? Vysotsky (talk) 13:26, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
@Vysotsky: ik wil graag behulpzaam zijn.
Je bent al #goedbezig. Vysotsky (talk) 19:25, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Ik neem van de gelegenheid gebruik om deze afbeelding onder je aandacht te brengen. Even rondneuzen bracht me al gauw bij "MEIJER, Johanna Henrietta Christina, (Na Hoedendoos of Tante Na) (geb. Amsterdam 29-10-1907 – gest. Amsterdam 7 februari 1986".
"Na Hoedendoos" zou een vergeten volkszangeres uit hartje Jordaan zijn. Kunnen we de categorizering nog verfijnen? Category:Female vocalists from the Netherlands lijkt geen geschikte keuze. Lotje (talk) 06:30, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Female vocalists lijkt me voorlopig verfijnd genoeg. Vysotsky (talk) 09:20, 12 August 2018 (UTC)   Done

File:Delft Porcelain, loaned by mr. Vanderkar, exhibited at Netherlands House, Charle, Bestanddeelnr 935-2151.jpg e.a.

Vreemde beschrijving bij deze e.a. files: Persoonsnaam : Charles Street, het zal wel de Charles Street, Mayfair betreffen. Duidelijk verengelst Nederlands. Eens zien of ik daar nog iets aan kan toevoegen.   Lotje (talk) 09:30, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Wethouder Franke

Only me again, ik stootte op wethouder Franke, vind echter de naam niet terug bij Category:Wethouder van Amsterdam. Weet jij raad? Lotje (talk) 13:53, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

De beschrijving bij die afbeelding zit er imo volledig naast, maar wat kan het dan zijn?... Lotje (talk) 14:01, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Beschrijving inmiddels aangepast. Vysotsky (talk) 14:19, 11 August 2018 (UTC)   Done
"Bernard C. Franke (1890-1953), was in Amsterdam wethouder voor de Openbare Gezondheid van 1939 tot 1941 en van 1945 tot 1953 wethouder voor Arbeidszaken"; maar dat had je zelf inmiddels ook al gezien. Vysotsky (talk) 14:11, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Category:Bernardus Cornelis Franke.   Done Vysotsky (talk) 09:47, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Inderdaad, bedankt, nu kan ik een en ander toevoegen hier en daar. :) Lotje (talk) 15:06, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Gedenksteen Markthallen voor gevallen Joodse medewerkers onthuld (ontwerp Hilda , Bestanddeelnr 910-7458.jpg

Hallo Vysotsky, zou dit Edzard van der Laan kunnen zijn? Ik vraag het maar omdat er een gelijkenis met Eberhard van der Laan is. Kan dit worden achterhaald? Lotje (talk) 14:02, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Nee, dat was J. van der Laan, zoon van de oud-directeur van de Markthallen Abraham van der Laan (zie http://www.Joodsmonument.nl/person/495804 ) Vysotsky (talk) 14:19, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

File:TV-programma van Frits van der Poel , in gesprek met oud minister Veldkamp . Han, Bestanddeelnr 921-1930.jpg

Vraagje, zou je deze file hernoemen? Lotje (talk) 09:11, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Dat kan. Geen bezwaar tegen. Maar ik vind persoonlijk de juiste categorisering en de beschrijving veel belangrijker dan bestandsnamen en interwiki-linking, dus ik begin met dat eerste.   Done Vysotsky (talk) 09:35, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
En deze? Lotje (talk) 09:16, 20 August 2018 (UTC) Lijkt me in orde. Vysotsky (talk) 16:00, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
And another one Lotje (talk) 09:33, 20 August 2018 (UTC) Nietszeggende bestandsnaam, maar ik weet niet wie er afgebeeld staan. Vysotsky (talk) 16:00, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Wie er zéker niet afgebeeld is, Marga Klompé.   Lotje (talk) 16:24, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Ereburgers, ministers-presidenten, Bestanddeelnr 930-9901.jpg

Hallo Vysotsky, zou dit Louis van Erp naast Dries van Agt kunnen zijn? Er staat nog geen afbeelding van hem op zijn lemma, vandaar! Lotje (talk) 12:26, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Zonder enige twijfel. Vysotsky (talk) 13:04, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Lijst van burgemeesters van Zaandam

Hallo Vysotsky, zou de burgemeester op de achtergrond op deze afbeelding Reint (R.) Laan jr. kunnen zijn? Lotje (talk) 06:26, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Ik denk het wel... Lotje (talk) 06:27, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
De gelijkenis is groot. Vysotsky (talk) 07:34, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

[[Category:Cornelis Verolme]]

Hallo Vysotsky, grappig, die laatste categorization File:Verolme ereburger van Nieuwe Tonge , Verolme eet soep met muzikanten, tevens. Hij drinkt namelijk maar op enkele foto's soep met de muzikanten. Je woorden indachtig dat een correcte categorizering primeert voegde ik ze onder Cornelis Verolme toe. Het vervolg laat ik graag aan jou over.   Lotje (talk) 16:42, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

  Lotje (talk) 07:47, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

[[Category:Photographs by Willem van de Poll in Bonaire]] versus [[Category:Photographs by Willem van de Poll]] en [[Bonaire]]

Hallo Vysotsky, afbeeldingen ondergebracht in deze categorieën. IMO zou die ene Category:Photographs by Willem van de Poll in Bonaire toch volstaan? Kwestie van het niet te ingewikkeld te maken. Wat denk je? Lotje (talk) 05:41, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Ik denk dat je gelijk hebt. Voor zover ik kan zien, hebben alle foto's in de subcateorieën niet ook de hoofdcategorie vermeld. Vysotsky (talk) 06:43, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Sunsets

Only me again, sunset om 09:25? Heb jij er enig idee van of dit nu een sunset of a sunrise is?   Lotje (talk) 05:45, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Duidelijk een zonsondergang. Tijdvermelding klopt waarschijnlijk gewoon niet (21.25?). Vysotsky (talk) 06:46, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Bedankt Vysotsky, dit is niet bepaald mijn specialiteit! !k breng de afbeelding bij de sunsets onder. Lotje (talk) 09:55, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Reportage van het interneringskamp op de Levantkade te Amsterdam. Nu zijn er ca., Bestanddeelnr 900-4235.jpg

Zou dit de Levantkade --> KNSM-eiland kunnen zijn denk je? Lotje (talk) 05:31, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Correct. Vysotsky (talk) 09:30, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
  Done Lotje (talk) 11:24, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Category proposal

Hello Vysotsky, could THIS SEARCH(except for the bookpages) form a category: Category:Prins Bernhard bezoekt front Noord-Oost Nederland, april 1945 ? --Havang(nl) (talk) 06:45, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

I would stick to Category:Bernhard of Lippe-Biesterfeld in 1945 and add a category naming the town or provincial names, like Category:1945 in Zwolle. Good luck, Vysotsky (talk) 09:24, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
I thought creating such a category permits the two parent categories Category:Bernhard of Lippe-Biesterfeld in 1945 and Category:Liberation of the Netherlands. Bernhard is not on all files, so I hesitate using Category:Bernhard of Lippe-Biesterfeld in 1945. By cat-a-lot this demands a minute, bun I shall leave these 82 files to others. And your second remark : I always try to put location and object categories, but by cat-a-lot that cannot be done in one edit, so it is a afterwards refinement. I did now Category:1945 in Zwolle by cat-a-lot, have a look. --Havang(nl) (talk) 14:14, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Bijschrift On Sparks many lives may depend. Wireless operator on converted D, Bestanddeelnr 935-2843.jpg

Zou hiermee Felix L. Sparks bedoeld zijn denk je?... Lotje (talk) 16:04, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

@Lotje: Door de officieren werd een marconist sparks (vonken) genoemd.--Havang(nl) (talk) 17:29, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Bedankt, Havang(nl), weer wat bijgeleerd vandaag.   Lotje (talk) 04:58, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Portrait photographs by Christopher Michel

Dag Vysotsky, Ik deed check overcategorisation bij Category:Portrait photographs by Christopher Michel. Ongeveer de helft was ook in Category:Photographs by Christopher Michel. Ik heb ze met cat-a-lot uit de parentcategory verwijderd. Vraag: moeten de portretten uit de subcategorieën zoals Category:Photographs of Bhutan by Christopher Michel ook de Category:Portrait photographs by Christopher Michel krijgen? Of zie le liever een subcategorie Category:Portrait photographs from Bhutan by Christopher Michel ? --Havang(nl) (talk) 21:19, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

I am merely adding and improving categories with the uncategorized photographs by Christopher Michel. Thanks for removing double categories. And please keep the country and portrait photographs separate. A new category Portrait photographs from Bhutan by CM would be ludicrous. Vysotsky (talk) 21:39, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
You seem to have some spare time. Perhaps you could help to correct some of the mistakes within the categories Dutch politicians, created with cat-a-lot? Vysotsky (talk) 21:39, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Irenebrug, Java

Hallo Vysotsky, zou te achterhalen of die brug nog bestaat? Lotje (talk) 07:21, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Geen idee. Het antwoord zal hier ooit wel opduiken. Vysotsky (talk) 18:57, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Foute beschrijving

Dag Vysotsky, in de beschrijving van File:KoopmanBreeuwer1928.jpg staat een foute vermelding Johanna (Jopie) Koopman (1910 - 1979) , vandaar dat die in de foute categorie kwam. Kun je dat controleren en corrigeren? Er staat nog een fout in : Het is miss Holland 1929 --Havang(nl) (talk) 08:28, 27 August 2018 (UTC)   Done

Categorie fotograaf

Dag Vysotsky, [[https://studiezaal.nijmegen.nl/zoeken/groep=Beeldbank/Vrij_zoeken=%22Gaal%2C%20Henk%20van%22/aantalpp=20/?nav_id=2-0 Deze collectie foto's staat volledig op wikimedia commons samen met nog bijna 20.000 foto's meer. Moet voor een amateurfotograaf een Category:Photographs by Henk van Gaal gemaakt worden? Zo ja, dan vul ik die. --Havang(nl) (talk) 17:34, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Het moet niet, maar het mag wel -en het lijkt mij in dit geval nuttig. Eén van de redenen daarvoor is dat iedereen daarmee makkelijker kan zoeken binnen foto's van één fotograaf. Je zou nog kunnen beslissen om direct de huidige vorm van de author ook aan te passen. Vysotsky (talk) 19:43, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Bedankt. De files zijn eerst op WP gezet, daarna delen aan het archief in Nijmegen en delen aan het archief in Den Bosch gegeven. Het is {{own work}}. Daarom heb ik tot nu toe geen cat aangemaakt, maar gezien al die WP fotografencategorieën acht ik inderdaad: het kan nuttig zijn. Wat bedoel je precies met de huidige vorm van de author aanpassen ? --Havang(nl) (talk) 09:16, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Tante Kee

Hallo Vysotsky, zou met tante Kee de predikant Aaldert Teunis Willem de Kluis (1897-1980) bedoeld zijn? Heb je een voorstel om deze afbeeldingen te categorizeren? Lotje (talk) 05:04, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Dat denk ik niet. Ik vermoed dat het een soort cabaret-act van Jan van Asseldonk was, zie ook pag. 3 van De Tijger. Aparte categorie lijkt me lastig zolang we niet van de hoed en de rand weten. Zie verder pag. 69 van Soldaat overzee 45-48. Vysotsky (talk) 12:20, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten

@Vysotsky:, zouden deze en deze foto's genomen door Frank Scholten in een (nog aan te maken) Category:Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten of Category:Netherlands Institute for the Near East thuishoren denk je? Lotje (talk) 13:47, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

  Done Vysotsky (talk) 12:36, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Fanclub1967CatStevens.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Fanclub1967CatStevens.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

BevinKacon (talk) 18:51, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Fanclub1966CatStevens.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Fanclub1966CatStevens.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

BevinKacon (talk) 18:51, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Fanclub1966CatStevens2.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Fanclub1966CatStevens2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

BevinKacon (talk) 18:51, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, I've fixed the images, let me know if you'd like to revert these messages too. Unfortunately, lots of copyrighted images are taken from fan wikis and tagged wrong.--BevinKacon (talk) 19:09, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
No prob. Messages will be archived in a few months. (And the posts will keep my memory fresh.) Vysotsky (talk) 19:11, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Surinam1980monument.JPG

@Vysotsky:, volgens Eddy Hoost zou zich in de Mozes en Aäronkerk een plaquette bevinden waar Romeo Hoost jaarlijks een herdenking organiseert. Volgens de beschrijving bij deze file, bevindt zich een plaquette in het Mr. Visserplein? Graag je advies. Grts. Lotje (talk) 04:58, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Moest zijn: "buiten aan de zijmuur van de Mozes en Aäronkerk".   Done Vysotsky (talk) 07:56, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

"Henk van Rinsum"

Hallo Vysostky, er staan nogal wat afbeeldingen van Henk van Rinsum op commons. Kan je eens zien om ze in one go onder te brengen in een nog aan te maken Category:Photographs by Henk van Rinsum? Lotje (talk) 16:24, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Category:Photographs by H.W. van Rinsum already exists. Vysotsky (talk) 17:38, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Oh, thank you very much Vysotsky, overzien. Lotje (talk) 04:56, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Category:Oosteinde, Amsterdam

Hallo Vysotsky, wil je eens kijken naar mijn recente toevoegingen? Ik wil de waarheid geen geweld aandoen. Alvast bedankt.   Lotje (talk) 15:42, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Lijkt me OK. Dank, Vysotsky (talk) 21:09, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

aanspreker --> File:Aanspreker. Foto uit de serie 'Costumes des Pays-Bas'.jpg en ander.

Vreemde vraag voor een Category:Aanspreker, nogal wereldvreemd hier op commons maar wat stel je voor. Lotje (talk) 10:49, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Andere oplossing gekozen. Vysotsky (talk) 19:48, 2 September 2018 (UTC)   Done
Schitterend, voegde de afbeeldingen ondertussen toe. Lotje (talk) 09:17, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Zoeken op commons naar Man verkleed als

@Vysotsky:, only me again. Deze fotos van Josephus Nuss vallen imo duidelijk onder de Category:Reenactments in the Netherlands, maar gezien de Rembrandtfeesten, zeg maar het Rembrandtjubileum in 1906 dacht ik dat het misschien aangewezen is een separate Category:Rembrandtjubileum (1906) aan te maken en deze onter te brengen in Reenactments in the Netherlands. Wat denk je? Lotje (talk) 11:38, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

As there have been (and are) several activities around Rembrandt in the Netherlands, I constructed Category:Rembrandt Festival (but not per year, so as to be able to include 1956 and new photographs). As most images are reenactments, I made this category part of Category:Reenactments in the Netherlands. Thanks for your useful suggestions. Vysotsky (talk) 11:50, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
@Vysotsky:, thank you, as always: schitterend werk. :-) Lotje (talk) 12:00, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Categorization, description

Hi Vysotsky, what to do with this file? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 08:37, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

You could add Category:Masquerade costume -if that fits. Vysotsky (talk) 10:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Elckering in Delft opgevoerd (Holland-festival) Elisabeth Haytink en Han Bentz v, Bestanddeelnr 914-0375.jpg

Hallo Vysotsky, zou dit in werkelijkheid Elckerlijc betreffen, opgevoerd in Delft (Holland Festival? Lotje (talk) 10:31, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Yes: Theaterencyclopedie. Vysotsky (talk) 10:46, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Thanks! Lotje (talk) 11:56, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Vertrek 10 burgemeesters naar Amerika Hustinx, Cremers en A de Roos, Bestanddeelnr 912-5899.jpg

Hallo Vysotsky, valt te achterhalen welke burgemeesters dit zijn denk je? Lotje (talk) 11:53, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Gemakkelijk. Er zijn een stuk of zes foto's van die reis, en na 5 minuten speuren heb je dan Waverijn (Koudekerk), Hustinx sr. (Nijmegen), Ab de Roos (weth. Amsterdam) en Oscar Cremers (Haarlem) in beeld. En wie nog tien minuten verder zou speuren, vindt die andere zes elders ook -maar die zijn voor deze foto's niet echt belangrijk. Vysotsky (talk) 12:23, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

De Maasbode

Hallo Vysotsky, tijdens mijn zoekactie bij Maasbode viel het mij op dat er nogal wat afbeeldingen zijn hier op commons. Zouden deze in een nog aan te maken onder Category:De Maasbode thuishoren? Lotje (talk) 12:21, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

De Category:De Maasbode is er al, maar de meeste foto's op Commons met het woord Maasbode in de beschrijving horen niet in deze categorie thuis (die zijn alleen in opdracht van De Maasbode gemaakt, en hebben verder mijns inziens geen band met de krant). Vysotsky (talk) 12:26, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
De afbeeldingen zullen wel ook niets te maken hebben met De Maasbode; God en mijn recht dacht ik. Of misschien toch? Gecodeerde berichten om de vijand te misleiden? Verder zoeken dus... Lotje (talk) 13:43, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Protestmars kunstenaars tegen oorlog in Vietnam

Hallo Vysostsky, grappig eigenlijk, dat er overal als locatie: Vietnam wordt aangegeven. Kan dit worden gewijzigd? Lotje (talk) 12:18, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Voel je vrij en ga je gang. De vraag hier stellen kost evenveel moeite als bij die 9 foto's het woord Vietnam veranderen in Amsterdam. Vysotsky (talk) 12:23, 9 September 2018 (UTC)   Done
Fijn, bedankt Vysotsky. Jij maakte het verschil om je duidelijk met zekerheid weet dat dit een protest in Amsterdam was. Vandaar mijn expliciete vraag.   Lotje (talk) 15:21, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Marc Bossuyt

Hallo Vysotsky, zou dit Marc Bossuyt kunnen zijn? Grts. Lotje (talk) 03:49, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

100% Vysotsky (talk) 07:36, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

HeitjeVoorEenKarweitje

Only me again, Vysotsky: er zijn nogal wat afbeeldingen die misschien kunnen worden ondergebracht in een Category:Een heitje voor een karweitje, wat denk je? Of heb je een naam die beter geschikt is. Zou je ze dan in one go categoriseren of geef je er de voorkeur aan het per jaar te doen? Let me know your thoughts.  Lotje (talk) 06:25, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Here you go: Category:A Bob a Job. One go is OK. Vysotsky (talk) 08:35, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Prachtig gedaan Vysotsky, maar kan ik nu al die afbeeldingen daarin onderbrengen en de link naar de nl maken? Lotje (talk) 11:31, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Ja, dat kan. Als je de foto's binnen de hoofdcategorie wil sorteren, zet je achter de categorie het jaar (|1949), maar dat weet je natuurlijk. Vysotsky (talk) 11:52, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

File:DirkCoster1930s.jpg

 
File:DirkCoster1930s.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:16, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Opening nieuwe afdeling Kabouterhuis Amsterdam Minister in t Veld, Bestanddeelnr 904-9906.jpg

Dit is zeker niet Joris in 't Veld, of hij moet een metamorfose ondergaan hebben... Als je 't mij vraagt zou dit best J.P. Kloos kunnen zijn tijdens de opening van het Kinderdagsanatorium 't Kabouterhuis (locatie Amstel), Amsterdam in 1952. Weet jij raad? Ik zou 'm natuurlijk graag in de infobox van het lemma plaatsen mocht ik de bevestiging krijgen dat hij het inderdaad is. Lotje (talk) 11:36, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

De meneer met de sleutel lijkt niet echt op Jan Piet Kloos, vind ik. Vysotsky (talk) 16:37, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Er komt wel ooit iemand langs die deze persoon kent.   Toch bedankt. Lotje (talk) 06:00, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Minister In t Veld verkoopt spaarbrieven Zaandam. Rechts op de foto Dhr. Plooije, Bestanddeelnr 092-0811.jpg

Sjonge, wat een schat aan informatie heeft Mr.Nostalgic in huis gehaald. Chapeau! ...en zou dit (rechts in beeld) Siem Plooijer kunnen zijn? De locatie, Zaandam, kan wel tellen dacht ik, voor de infobox aldaar. Lotje (talk) 11:44, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Hij lijkt niet erg op de echte Siem Plooijer. Vysotsky (talk) 16:31, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Category:Sloterdijk (ship)

Ik had verschillende afbeeldingen ondergebracht in die (nog aan te maken) category, maar misschien weet jij meer over dit schip. Ik zou nl. op de nl Sloterdijk OP de opmerking maken dat er ook een schip onder deze naam bestond. :-) Lotje (talk) 13:54, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Ik weet over de Ms. Sloterdijk niets dan dit. Vysotsky (talk) 16:34, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Joris in 't Veld

Als je 't mij vraagt, ik zou liever die foto van een rokende Joris in 't Veld verwijderd zien in wikidata. Ik weet wel, men moet de geschiedenis niet willen herschrijven, maar er zijn andere afbeeldingen beschikbaar waarop hij niet zit te roken. deze of deze. Wat denk je? Lotje (talk) 15:04, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

"Een tevreden roker is geen onruststoker". Ik geef de voorkeur aan deze foto. Vysotsky (talk) 16:27, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Beschrijving bij afbeelding: "wethouder Wildekam" ?

 
Cabotschool in Amsterdam omgedoopt tot Joop Westerweelschool in bijzijn van wethouder Wildekam en mevrouw Westerweel

Hallo Vysotsky, weet jij wie bedoeld wordt met Wethouder Wildekam? Ed van Thijn die als "Wildekam" wordt omgeschreven? Ik denk het niet...   Lotje (talk) 11:59, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Dit is ze zeker niet. Lotje (talk) 12:05, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Dit is ze wel: Category:Ada Wildekamp. Vysotsky (talk) 16:01, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
  Denk je dat die afbeelding kan worden toegevoegd aan Category:Admiralengracht, Amsterdam? Lotje (talk) 05:20, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Zeker. Het staat zelfs op het bordje. Vysotsky (talk) 21:28, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

"Euromotel geopend door wethouder mr. H.F.C. van Wijck"

Hallo Vysotsky, vetreft hiet hier de wethouder Franciscus van Wijck (Francisus van Wijck --> Wethouder Van Wijck-straat (Franciscus) (1901-1970) - Amsterdams wethouder van onder meer Gemeente Belangen denk je? Lotje (talk) 07:59, 13 September 2018 (UTC) Enig idee waar deze afbeeldingen kunnen worden ondergebracht? ~~smiley}} Lotje (talk) 07:59, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Category:Mercure Hotel Amsterdam Sloterdijk & Category:Wethouders of Amsterdam -als Van Wijck op de foto staat. Het gaat hier om het eerste Eurmotel Amsterdam (1962), tegenwoordig Mercure Hotel Amsterdam Sloterdijk (Accor). Vysotsky (talk) 21:41, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Locatie is niet correct, kan ik dit worden aangepast?

Hallo Vysotsky, de locatie kan niet kloppen op deze beide afbeeldingen: 1 en 2, vanwege de Nederlandstalige tekst, alleen, weet ik niet waar het station zich bevindt. Liever geen zaken invullen die achteraf niet correct blijken te zijn. Vandaar mijn vraag. Grts. Lotje (talk) 08:40, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Aanpassingen niet nodig, wat mij betreft. De trein kwam uit Parijs, met inspecteurs op zoek naar een oplossing van de Japanse koffermoord. Ik heb passende categorieën toegevoegd. Vysotsky (talk) 22:16, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Avondopname M. S. Klipfontein, Bestanddeelnr 905-4827.jpg

Dat zal wel niet in Klipfontein gefotografeerd zijn, ze zijn namelijk aan het schaatsen zo te zien. De vraag is maar, wat is het dan?   Lotje (talk) 04:50, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Misschien iets te maken met de Klipfontein, gezien de datum van de opname: 9 januari 1953 en de locatie? Lotje (talk) 05:52, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Wat leuk dat je die foto gevonden hebt. Het is een prachtfoto van J.D. Noske, van twee Volendamse meisjes op (en twee bij) een bevroren IJsselmeer. De datum klopt, maar de rest van de beschrijving niet. Ik zal de naam en de beschrijving aanpassen. Bedankt! Vysotsky (talk) 07:27, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Inderdaad, Vysotsky, een prachtige foto, die moet ik toch ergens kunnen neerzetten! Lotje (talk) 08:03, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Wethouder Van der Velde (geheel rechts) en de leerlingen, Bestanddeelnr 927-9779.jpg

Inly me again, enig idee wie die "Van der Velde", of die zou kunnen zijn, of deze? Er zijn er nogal wat Thnks. Lotje (talk) 09:08, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Rudi van der Velde (CPN), wethouder onderwijs Amsterdam 1970-1979. Vysotsky (talk) 09:16, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Tweede deel van je vraag: resp. Arie de Froe, Rudi van der Velde, Rudi van der Velde en meestal Rudi van der Velde. Vysotsky (talk) 09:32, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
ook hier moet ik passen: wethouder Spoelstra Lotje (talk) 10:47, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Niet te snel passen. Met een klein beetje zoeken: mr. J.H.J.C. (Hans) Spoelstra (CDA), o.a. wethouder openbare werken Amsterdam (1978-1982). Vysotsky (talk) 10:53, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Bezoek van prinses Juliana aan Suriname (1943)

Hallo Vysotsky, zou een Category:Visit of Juliana of the Netherlands to Suriname (1943) m.b.t. bezoek zinvol zijn? Ik had reeds 2 afbeeldingen ondergebracht in Category:Juliana of the Netherlands in 1943, maar misschien is een separate category beter geschikt. Thnks. Lotje (talk) 05:04, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Ik aarzel. Het lijkt op zich nuttig, maar omdat er geen enkele andere categorie met NL (staats)bezoeken is, zou dit wellicht een zeer eenzame categorie worden. Beslis zelf maar. Vysotsky (talk) 08:46, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

  The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
>140,000 edits and >12 years of service, dat kan tellen! Bedankt voor je inzet. Lotje (talk) 05:34, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=Interneringskamp+%22Vinkenkrocht%22&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go

@Vysotsky: denk je dat een Category:Interneringskamp Vinkenkrocht zinvol is? Lotje (talk) 10:30, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Category:Buildings in Bergen, North Holland lijkt mooi genoeg. Vysotsky (talk) 12:32, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Vluchtheuvel

Hallo Vysotsky, zie jij hier ergens een vluchtheuvel of willen mijn ogen plots niet meer mee?   Lotje (talk) 14:37, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Als je die stoep links een vluchtheuvel noemt, zie ik een vluchtheuvel. Vysotsky (talk) 11:18, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Ik zie het. De tekst gaat over deze foto. Dus nr 909-7069 heeft geen vluchtheuvel. Vysotsky (talk) 11:20, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

"kledingcentrum in ataka"

@Vysotsky:, de spelling is waarschijnlijk fout: Attaka (cfr. La chaîne de l’Attaka). Wat te doen? Lotje (talk) 08:48, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Resolved, as I see: Ataka. Vysotsky (talk) 09:05, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Specifieke vraag

@Vysotsky: ik had daar een specifieke vraag m.b.t. tot de beschrijving bij bv. deze afbeelding. Wat is daarvan de bedoeling? Bedankt. Lotje (talk) 09:40, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Waarschijnlijk linken naar een beschrijving elders. Vysotsky (talk) 09:06, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Pieter Menten

Hallo Vysotsky, er zijn nogal wat afbeeldingen, en hier die te maken hebben het proces. Zou een separate category aangewezen zijn denk je? Lotje (talk) 07:05, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Er waren drie processen-Menten. Wat mij betreft gaat/blijft alles in 1 categorie: Category:Pieter Menten. En inderdaad, daar komen dan ook foto's in waar alleen bijv. zijn advocaat op staat. Soit. Vysotsky (talk) 09:10, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
@Vysotsky: waar zou de jas kunnen zijn?. Hernoemen lijkt aangewezen, de vraag is maar, wie is wie. :-) Lotje (talk) 06:13, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Ondertrouw

@Vysotsky:, denk je dat een Category:Ondertrouw prinses Beatrix and Claus of iets dergelijks zinvol is? 109 afbeeldingen, dat kan tellen.   Lotje (talk) 11:06, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Nooit gedacht dat ik dat nog eens een goed idee zou vinden. Maar toch, en ik kom zelfs tot 120 stuks. Mijn voorstel: Category:Deposition for marriage of Beatrix of the Netherlands and Claus van Amsberg. (Ondertrouw kent geen echt Engels equivalent, en het origineel houden lijkt me ongewenst.) Vysotsky (talk) 11:16, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Wil jij dan de category aanmaken en alle afbeeldingen in one go toevoegen? Dan wil ik nadien graag alle files in deze category overlopen.
deze file hoort er alvast niet thuis, want het is de oorkonde van de geboorte van Beatrix de Nederlanden. Zal dus moeten hernoemd worden denk ik...   Lotje (talk) 11:49, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
@Vysotsky: Category:Deposition for marriage of Margriet of the Netherlands and Pieter van Vollenhoven zit er ook nog aan te komen. Help needed here. Lotje (talk) 12:50, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
@Vysotsky: er bestaat een artikel op de en.wikipedia, misschien kan hier een Category:Ondertrouw worden aan gemaakt onder Category:Marriage? Lotje (talk) 06:17, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Utrechtsch Studenten Corps

@Vysotsky:, ik begon de afbeeldingen van het "Utrechts Studenten Corps" onder te brengen in Category:1951 in Utrecht (city), maar misschien moet toch een Category:Utrechtsch Studenten Corps worden aangemaakt. Wat denk je? Lotje (talk) 06:27, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Goed idee (nieuwe categorie). Vysotsky (talk) 09:06, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
@Vysotsky:   Done Lotje (talk) 14:15, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Vraagje, waar zou ik de afbeeldingen Mr. H. W. van Hylkema kunnen onderbrengen denk je? Lotje (talk) 14:15, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Category:Civil servants of the Netherlands. Vysotsky (talk) 19:19, 29 September 2018 (UTC)   Done

File:Lustrum Utrechts Studenten Corps. Lustrumspel. De auteur A.E.M. v.d. Does de Wil, Bestanddeelnr 056-0984.jpg

Hallo Vysotsky zou met zekerheid te achterhalen zijn wie wie is? Alexander van der Does de Willebois tussen Prins Bernhard en Juliana der Nederlanden of tussen Juliana der Nederlanden en Jhr. van Beresteyn (in zijn rol van Djenghis Khan)? Lotje (talk) 13:22, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Nee, dat is niet met zekerheid te zeggen. Als het bijschrift te vertrouwen was, zou ik natuurlijk kiezen voor de jongeheer tussen Juliana en Bernhard. In dit geval lijkt dat waarschijnlijk (want enige foto), maar zeker is het niet. Zo zag Alexander van der Does er een paar decennia later uit. Vysotsky (talk) 19:31, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Grove fout van Lotje

@Vysotsky:, ik maakte een grove fout, rename was totaal verkeerd. Hoe kan ik dit best oplossen? Thnks. Lotje (talk) 05:14, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

No problem. Vysotsky (talk) 07:25, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
  Resolved

Rijn-Schelde-Verolme

@Vysotsky:, vind je een separate category zinvol? Lotje (talk) 11:22, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Zeer zeker. RSV heeft maar 12 jaar bestaan, maar was decennia helaas de best bekende scheepsbouwer in Nederland. (En er bestaat zelfs al een ondercategorie). Vysotsky (talk) 14:09, 3 October 2018 (UTC)   Done

File:Oorlogswinter van Jan Terlouw verfilmd door de VARA Andrea Domburg (l) en reg, Bestanddeelnr 927-8049.jpg

@Vysotsky: is te achterhalen of Den Alerdinck, Laag Zuthem de filmlocatie geweest is voor Oorlogswinter? Zo ja, voeg ik die category toe aan Den Alerdinck, Laag Zuthem. Grts. Lotje (talk) 14:00, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Ja, Den Alerdinck was de locatie waar de televisieserie in 1975 door de VARA werd opgenomen (zie onder meer dagblad Trouw, 17 maart 1975). En ik zou het andersom doen: c:Category:Den Alerdinck, Laag Zuthem toevoegen aan c:Category:Oorlogswinter (TV series). Op enkele foto's is de havezate ook goed te herkennen. Vysotsky (talk) 19:24, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Category:D. van Oort

@Vysotsky:, ik hadn in analogie met de nl en met tekening een Category:D. van Oort Hzn aangemaakt. Ik ga ervan uit dat de schrijfwijze van een naam zoals de auteur aangeeft, dient te worden naagestreefd. Ondertussen merkte ik de Category:D. van Oort op. Wat te doen? Thnks. Lotje (talk) 05:16, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Beste Lotje, De andere categorie was iets uitgebreider en was eerder aangemaakt. Ik heb jouw versie voorzien van een doorverwijzing. Vysotsky (talk) 19:38, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
@Vysotsky:, ik denk dat je een foute doorverwijzing maakte. Kan je nog eens checken? Lotje (talk) 04:27, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Jaap Stotijn

@Vysotsky: Jaap Statijn, hernoemen (cfr. #3) of ongewijzigd laten en enkel met een wikilink aanvullen? Wat denk je? Grts. Lotje (talk) 05:01, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Jaap Statijn is een andere persoon dan Jaap Stotijn. Ik zou de Stotijn-cat weghalen bij de 4 Statijnen. Vysotsky (talk) 07:56, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Heintje Davids opgebaard in Carre, Amsterdam bij de baar Sylvain Poons , muzika, Bestanddeelnr 927-7628.jpg

@Vysotsky: is te achterhalen wie wie is? Rexis heeft nog geen plaatje en misschien kan ik op de OP de vraag stellen of de afbeelding geschikt is. Thnks. Lotje (talk) 12:15, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Easy. Vysotsky (talk) 13:03, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
  Resolved

Dubbele category

@Vysotsky: er is een Category:Jan Abel Wassenbergh (I) en een Category:Jan Wassenbergh. Kan je dit even nazien en evt. corrigeren? Thnks. Lotje (talk) 12:24, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Father & son. Vysotsky (talk) 12:40, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
Bedankt! Lotje (talk) 13:58, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Gijsbert van der Sande

@Vysotsky: "Gijsbert van der Sande (1863-1910) was photographer of the 1903 North New Guinea Expedition" 425 stuks. Er bestaat reeds een {{creator:Gijsbert van der Sande}}, kan overwogen worden deze afbeeldingen onder te brengen in een Category:Photographs by Gijsbert van der Sande? Het zouden er wel teveel zijn om manueel uit te voeren, dus... help needed. Grts.   Lotje (talk) 10:57, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Category aangemaakt. Vysotsky (talk) 13:48, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Fijn, bedankt. BTW zie jij hier ergens J.W. van Nouhuys op deze foto of overzie ik iets?   Lotje (talk) 14:26, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Portret van twee Papua's - Collectie stichting Nationaal Museum van Wereldculturen - TM-60014999.jpg

@Vysotsky: er zijn nogal wat afbeeldingen waar P.E.H. (Pieter Eliza Hocke) Moolenburgh (1872 - 1944) als depicted people wordt aangegeven. Ik begon ze onder te brengen in een (nog aan te maken) Category: Pieter Eliza Hocke Moolenburgh (1872 - 1944) maar hoorde toch graag je mening hieromtrent. Grts. Lotje (talk) 16:31, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

SPIJTOPTANTEN

@Vysotsky:, enig idee wat dit zou kunnen zijn? spijtoptanten en waterman (schip)?) Lotje (talk) 04:23, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Deze spijtoptanten kwamen naar Nederland met de het schip De Waterman. Vysotsky (talk) 14:03, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Dozens of pictures, as I see. I'll make a separate category tomorrow. Vysotsky (talk) 14:12, 8 October 2018 (UTC)   Done

File:KOningin Juliana op Dachvaert van de Nederlandse Gidsen te Lunteren, Bestanddeelnr 907-1683.jpg

@Vysotsky: zie jij hier ergens Juliana der Nederlanden of overzie ik iets?   Lotje (talk) 06:52, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Vooraan rechts. Niet direct herkenbaar, maar toch wel echt Juliana. Vysotsky (talk) 14:00, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Nederlandse Vereniging tot Bescherming van Dieren

@Vysotsky: om een Category:Nederlandse Vereniging tot Bescherming van Dieren aan te maken van een Nederlandse vereniging, houdt men de Nederlandse naam aan of de Engelse? Thnks. Lotje (talk) 12:17, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

See Category:Animal rights organizations: Amigos Pro Animal, Deutscher Tierschutzbund, Société protectrice des animaux in France‎. Vysotsky (talk) 12:20, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Current name: Dierenbescherming. Vysotsky (talk) 12:23, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
thnks dan maak ik de Category:Dierenbescherming aan. Lotje (talk) 13:09, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Een meisje Esther in de tuin van het huis van Von Eugen in Spanje, Bestanddeelnr 254-5590.jpg

@Vysotsky: denk je dat deze afbeelding bij Category:Photographs by Willem van de Poll in Switzerland thuishoort? Lotje (talk) 05:12, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Hoort waarschijnlijk bij deze reeks. imo kloppen de beschrijvingen niet. Enig idee wie deze Frederic von Eugen kan zijn? Misschien kan het dan worden achterhaald.
Interessant. De meeste beschrijvingen kloppen wel ongeveer, op dat woord "Spanje" in deze beschrijving na: dat moet zijn: Losone, kanton Tessin (Zwitserland). Frederic von Eugen was uitgever, echtgenoot van Alice van Nauhuys. Ze hadden een huis in Zwitserland, niet ver van Ascona waarheen fotograaf Van de Poll was verhuisd. Zie ook dit lezenswaardige artikel (waar niets in staat over Van de Poll, dat las ik elders). Ik zal ook wat aanpassen aan de categorieën en beschrijvingen. Vysotsky (talk) 20:00, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Gravenstenebrug

@Vysotsky:, voortgaande op de nl.wikipedia, paste ik de files aan en zopas kwam ik bij deze file met de naamplaat: Gravestenebrug. De Category:Gravestenenbrug voegde ik ondertussen toe, maar om eerlijk te zijn, ik zit niet lekker in mijn vel. Lotje (talk) 13:25, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

No problem. Vysotsky (talk) 20:09, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Wilhelm Ivens (e.a.?)

Dag, Vysotsky. Zoekende naar foto's van thomistisch hoogleraar J.V. de Groot, over wie toch eens een artikel moet worden aangemaakt, vond ik meerdere afbeeldingen (zie juist aangemaakte Category:Joannes Vincentius de Groot), waaronder een van (ook net aangemaakte) Category:Wilhelm Ivens, die ik vond op deze site: https://www.noviomagus.nl/Kabinetfoto/Fotografen.htm. Ik zag die pagina niet in je overzicht, dus ik dacht wellicht kun je er nog wat mee – ik heb nog niet verder gekeken dan enkele afbeeldingen van Ivens. M.v.g., Jürgen Eissink (talk) 11:56, 10 October 2018 (UTC).

Thanx. Vysotsky (talk) 12:18, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Jaap Wolff

@Vysotsky: zou dit hem kunnen zijn? thnks. Lotje (talk) 14:42, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Het is em dus niet. jammer.   Lotje (talk) 14:44, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
Here you go: Jaap Wolff. Vysotsky (talk) 15:05, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=%22Begrafenis+van+de+sultan+van+Langkat%22&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go

@Vysotsky:, denk je dat een separate category: Category:Funeral of Sultan Mahmud Abdul Jalil Rahmad Shah aangebracht is, of zou het iemand anders betreffen? Lotje (talk) 06:16, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Sultans of Langkat lijkt als categorie voldoende. Vysotsky (talk) 07:40, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Minister de Pons

@Vysotsky: wie is minister de pons? Vind ik nergens terug.   Lotje (talk) 05:22, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Minister de Pous. Vysotsky (talk) 07:35, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Ingebruikneming Donaupont, Bestanddeelnr 906-2039.jpg

@Vysotsky: waar zou jij dit onderbrengen? Lotje (talk) 04:51, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Ferries in the Netherlands. Vysotsky (talk) 07:37, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Twee Indonesische mannen sleutelen aan een motorfiets. De linker heeft de afkorting "T.D." op zijn baret staan"

@Vysotsky:, de beschrijving is niet correct, er staat (tenminste als ik goed kan lezen) LTD en geen "T.D"   Lotje (talk) 06:30, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Stud observation! Vysotsky (talk) 11:55, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
  Resolved

Order of the Golden Ark

@Vysotsky:, ik liep tegen deze afbeeldingen aan die betrekking hebben op de Orde van de Gouden Ark en vroeg me af of er een separate category moet komen. Ik had er zopas een Category:Gouden Ark van gemaakt, maar overleg liever eerst. In één adem, weet jij wie N.F. (Niels) Halbertsma is? Hij ontving ook een Gouden Ark.   Lotje (talk) 12:33, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Order of the Golden Ark. Vysotsky (talk) 12:45, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Create a Category:Order of the Golden Ark recipients? Lotje (talk) 12:56, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Not necessary. Just park them under the Order. Vysotsky (talk) 12:58, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Halbertsma: Dutch photographer, director of Dutch World Wildlife Fund 1974-1990. Vysotsky (talk) 12:51, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Thanks Vysotsky Lotje (talk) 12:56, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Kol. museum. Lezing Dr. Halbertsma, Bestanddeelnr 902-7901.jpg

@Vysotsky: heb jij enig idee wie deze Dr. Halbertsma kan zijn? Lotje (talk) 14:34, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

No clue. Map of Congo behind him. Lecture in "Koloniaal Museum" 1948. Nothing found in delpher.nl Vysotsky (talk) 14:45, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Koloniaal Museum probably in the KIT-gebouw ? Lotje (talk) 15:27, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Right. Vysotsky (talk) 16:26, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Marvo begrafenis Eindhoven Van Schaik

@Vysotsky: heb jij er enig idee wie deze Van Schaik is? Waar zouden deze afbeeldingen thuishoren? Thnks. Lotje (talk) 16:37, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Geen idee. MARVO is Marine Voorlichtingsdienst (zie ook de uniformen), en Van Schaik werd waarschijnlijk in Eindhoven begraven, maar verder kom ik niet. Vysotsky (talk) 18:43, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Mgrs. Moebers

@Vysotsky:, who the heck is Mgr. Meub of Meubers   Lotje (talk) 08:14, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Het Bisdom Rotterdam werd in 1956 opgericht. Tot dan viel Zuid-Holland onder het bisdom Amsterdam/Haarlem, waar bisschop Huibers de scepter zwaaide. Hier werd hij uitgezwaaid. Beschrijvingen zijn aangepast. Vysotsky (talk) 09:08, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Hartstikke bedankt Vysotsky, weer iets "ausgeklärt". Lotje (talk) 13:49, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Opdracht Maasbode

@Vysotsky:, het een zal wel niet met het ander te maken hebben...   Lotje (talk) 08:24, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

of toch? :-) Lotje (talk) 08:27, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Geen idee! Vysotsky (talk) 09:17, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Willem van de Poll

Hello Vysotsky,

Willem van de Poll heve Serie of photos taken in Israel during 1948-1949 like this one. They all dated as "1 januari 1948" but it is not possible that all of the taken in the same day. They have taken during 1948 and 1949. -- Geagea (talk) 13:58, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Geagea. You are quite right. I always remove this fake date from the descriptions of all photographs by Van de Poll whenever I see them. I have also already asked User:Mr.Nostalgic to remove the 1 Jan. part from all Van de Poll photographs. He will do this after this job will be finished. Vysotsky (talk) 14:05, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
And I hope 1948-1949 covers all years. I should read the book by Louis Zweers (Willem van de Poll - Arnhem 2005) to know when exactly Van de Poll was in Israel. Vysotsky (talk) 14:27, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Well, there are some from 1964-1965 (File:Toegang tot de Citadel-gevangenis. Israël 1964-1965, Akko (Acre), Citadel-gevangenis.jpg) and there are some undated that should get template {{Other date}}) < 1971 (deathtyear). -- Geagea (talk) 22:47, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Kellenbach, F.C

@Vysotsky: zou te achterhalen zijn wie deze fotograaf is? Er staan nogal wat afbeeldingen van hem hier op commons. Thnks. Lotje (talk) 16:38, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

F.C. Kellenbach was een legerfotograaf. Hij fotografeerde delen van een van de bijzondere krijgshandelingen in de Nederlands-Indonesische oorlog. In het boekje Koloniale oorlog 1945-1949 (Amsterdam, 2015) staat daarover de volgende passage: "Van legerfotograaf F.C. Kellenbach zijn twee contactvellen met in totaal zevenendertig negatieven bewaard gebleven, met als aanduiding: ‘Actie van 4-4 Bat. Jagers Magetan, Oost-Java, Kellenbach’. Er zijn geen onderschriften aangetroffen. In het betreffende kwartaalverslag van het bataljon staat vermeld dat aan ‘eigen kant’ twaalf doden en zesentwintig gewonden zijn te betreuren en ruim driehonderddertig [330] vijandelijke doden zijn gevallen." Ik heb een aparte categorie voor zijn foto's aangemaakt. Dank voor de tip! Vysotsky (talk) 19:35, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Deze collectie bevat divers explosief materiaal (in de figuurlijke zin van het woord). Een indeling op alle fotografen is een aardige eerste stap, maar niet genoeg voor een goede ontsluiting van de DLC-collectie. Ik denk in elk geval aan een indeling op eiland of streek, maar ik weet te weinig van het onderwerp. Ik ga eens rondvragen buiten Wiki. Vysotsky (talk) 19:39, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
@Vysotsky: met de Koloniale oorlog 1945-1949 bedoelt men de Indonesische Onafhankelijkheidsoorlog neem ik aan... Inderdaad, zoals je terecht stelt: ...materiaal (in de figuurlijke zin van het woord)... Imo ontbreekt het boekje in het hoofdstuk "Nederland en de Indonesische Revolutie 1945 tot 1950 in de geschiedschrijving" Lotje (talk) 04:14, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
@Vysotsky: bedankt voor het aanmaken van de Category:Photographs by F.C. Kellenbach. De vraag is maar, hoe krijg ik de overige afbeeldingen "in one go" in deze category? Handmatig, dat zie ik écht niet zitten. Thnks;   Lotje (talk) 05:02, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Fotograaf Kroeze, N.

@Vysotsky: ook hier nogal wat foto's van een Kroeze, N. Zou hier ook te achterhalen wie deze illustere fotograaf is? Lotje (talk) 15:32, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Category:Photographs by N. Kroeze aangemaakt. Vysotsky (talk) 16:56, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Category:Paul Vitzthumb

@Vysotsky:, een paar afbeeldingen had ik reeds aan de category toegevoegd, maar ik vraag me af het het niet beter ware een separate category aan te maken in de aard van Category:Works after Paul Vitzthumb. Graag je advies. Thnks. Lotje (talk) 07:16, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Een stapje simpeler: Category:Drawings by Paul Vitzthumb ? Vysotsky (talk) 17:08, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

@Vysotsky: de afbeeldingen waar niet expliciet bijstaat dat het een tekening is van Paul Vitzthumb zou ik er niet in opnemen. Ook nog dit, de lithograaf zou Guillaume Philidor Van den Burggraaff of Guillaume Philidor Van den Burggraaf. Kan dit een andere piste vormen? Lotje (talk) 17:35, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

G.P. Vanden Burggraaff lijkt nog een andere schrijfwijze. Lotje (talk) 17:40, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
In de meeste gevallen neem ik de vorm over die de RKD hanteert. Dat is hier Guillaume Philidor Van den Burggraaff. See Category:Guillaume Philidor Van den Burggraaff. Vysotsky (talk) 18:43, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

PS Als de tekeningen uit de Collection des anciennes portes de Bruxelles komen, zijn ze volgens mij gewoon oorspr. van Vitzthumb: "Rares lithographies d'Alexandre Boëns (Tournai 1783-? après 1837), d'après d'admirables dessins, tant sur le plan artistique que topographique, de P. Vitzthumb, publiées par G. P. Vanden Burggraaff en livraisons séparées" (tekenaar Vitzthumb, lithograaf Alexandre Boëns, uitg. door Van den Burggraaff). Vysotsky (talk) 19:15, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Bedankt voor de toelichtinging. Dit onthoud ik dus: eerst verifieren bij RKD, daarna de wijze raad van Vysotsky vragen.   Lotje (talk) 05:04, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
RKD is stukken beter! Vysotsky (talk) 08:19, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Category:Photographs by Willem van de Poll in Paris (1936)

@Vysotsky: duidelijke foute category aan de kalender te zien, ik maak daarom een nieuwe category aan en ga ervan uit dat de andere afbeeldingen van deze concierge ook daar thuishoren.   Lotje (talk) 15:10, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Seems correct. Thanks! Vysotsky (talk) 18:44, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Harry Steggerda

@Vysotsky: er zijn nogal wat afbeeldingen van Harry Steggerda, misschien de moeite om uit te vissen wie hij was en een Category:Photographs by Harry Steggerda aan te maken? Ik zeg zo maar wat.   Lotje (talk) 05:18, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Hendricus Steggerda?
Ook deze afbeelding waar: Scheepers, dan tijdelijk vertegenwoordiger DLC in West-Sumatria in de rang van kapitein infanterie KNIL, liep in de week van 13-19 maart 1949, samen met fotograaf H. Steggerda, in een hinderlaag en is nadien vermist. (datum foto: 8 november 1947) Lotje (talk) 05:32, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
  Resolved

Ferdinand de Waele

@Vysotsky: ik was begonnen enkele afbeeldingen in een (nog aan te maken) Category:Ferdinand de Waele te plaatsen. Ik meen dat Ferdinand de Waele rechtstaat, 6de van links. Zou ik het daarbij houden of had je een ander voorstel? Lotje (talk) 14:20, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Er is een foto met 14 en een met 13 mensen. Die van 14 mensen telt 8 mannen, waarvan 5 met bril, waarvan 3 geen geestelijke. Inderdaad lijkt De Waele daar de zesde van links. Ik heb geen tijd om uit te zoeken wie de andere 13 zijn. Als jij dat ook niet hebt, zou ik het daar nu maar bij houden. Vysotsky (talk) 14:48, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Het is perfect zo, ik wilde enkel je mening horen. Thnks. Lotje (talk) 15:09, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Martine Labouchere

@Vysotsky:, enig idee welke category de voorkeur geniet? Category:Martine Labouchere of Category:Martine van Loon-Labouchere? Thnks. zie ook deze Lotje (talk) 15:25, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Mijn voorkeur heeft iemands eigen naam. Als een vrouw vooral bekend staat onder haar mans naam, zou ik beide namen vermelden. In dit geval was Martine Labouchere tweemaal getrouwd (2x 15 jaar, met resp. de 46 jaar oudere Daniël Delplrat en daarna met Maurits van Loon), maar doorslaggevend is voor mij de naam waarmee ze in de Nederlandstalige Wiki figureert: Martine Labouchere. Ik neem aan dat jij het artikel van een foto voorziet. Vysotsky (talk) 17:36, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

@Vysotsky:; wil jij deze file eens onder handen nemen? Hernoemen en beschrijving aanpassen? Grts. Lotje (talk) 07:45, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Licht aangepast. Naam en metadata klopten. Vysotsky (talk) 08:57, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
@Vysotsky:, bedankt voor je hulp bij het achterhalen wie-wie-is. Zou de dame helemaal links (met de rug naar de camera) misschien Martine Labouchere in deux-pièce kunnen zijn? Lotje (talk) 11:37, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Wat zeker is: dit is Martine Labouchere. Vysotsky (talk) 13:37, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Minister-presidenten, bloemen, vrouwen, Leuv mw G vd, Mendes-France mw, Bestanddeelnr 084-0514.jpg

@Vysotsky:, weet jij hier raad mee? Kan dit de echtgenote zijn van Pierre Mendès France? Lotje (talk) 14:54, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Raadselachtig. Zijn tweede vrouw Marie-Claire de Fleurieu ontmoette hij pas een jaar later, in 1955. Is dit dan een afbeelding van zijn eerste vrouw, Liliane Cicurel, die in 1954 ongeveer 44 jaar oud was? Ik heb geen antwoord. Zet de foto maar in de categorie Pierre Mendès-France, dan kan een specialist de foto tegen komen en misschien antwoord geven. Vysotsky (talk) 19:58, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
De dame rechts is een KLM stewardess. Mijn best guess (maar niet meer dan dat) is dat Mendès-France met zijn vrouw met een KLM-vliegtuig vloog, en dat dit een aardige publiciteitsfoto was. Maar waar dat mw G. vd Leuv dan vandaan komt? Vysotsky (talk) 20:02, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Bedankt Vysotsky. Misschien heette de stewardess wel G. vd Leuv.  , ik plaatste alvast de afbeelding in de Category:Pierre Mendès-France Lotje (talk) 06:31, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

R.G. Jonkman

@Vysotsky: bij gelegenheid, wanneer je de tijd vindt: is te achterhalten wie Jonkman, R.G. was? Ik blijf verderzoeken maar ben ervan overtuigd dat jij de enige bent die daar een antwoord op kan vinden.   Lotje (talk) 16:27, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Misschien helpt deze (mislukte) opname ook. Lotje (talk) 16:34, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Of deze Lotje (talk) 17:13, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Hij stond op mijn wenslijstje, tussen 10 fotografen van de Dienst Legercontacten Indonesië. Ik heb er nu twee even naar voren gehaald. Vysotsky (talk) 19:35, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Prins der Nederlanden

@Vysotsky:, er zou een vroegere Prins der Nederlanden, eerder dan Prins der Nederlanden (ship, 1957). Enig idee hoer ik deze afbeelding beter kan categorizeren? Thnks. Lotje (talk) 16:04, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Geen idee. En voor mij niet snel te vinden. Welke botenspecialisten hebben we aan boord? Vysotsky (talk) 21:27, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
@Vysotsky:, heb zoëven een aanzet gegeven op het Portaal Maritiem, misschien komt er iemand langs die in deze materie onderlegd is. Lotje (talk) 08:46, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Prijs voor Literaire Kritiek

@Vysotsky: er zijn nogal wat personen die allemaal op C. J. E. Dinaux lijken, me dunkt.   Weet jij raad? Lotje (talk) 12:28, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Grappig. De meeste herken ik -ik kijk wat ik kan doen. Vysotsky (talk) 19:23, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Category:Royal Leerdam Crystal

@Vysotsky: ik was begonnen met een Category:Glasfabriek Leerdam aan te maken, maar vraag me af of dit wel verstandig is gezien de reeds bestaande Category:Royal Leerdam Crystal. Of hoe zie jij dit? Lotje (talk) 13:11, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Royal Leerdam Crystal lijkt voldoende. Vysotsky (talk) 16:37, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Buuren, van / DLC

@Vysotsky: hebben we hier een fotograaf van Buuren in de Category:Photographers from the Netherlands die mij ontgaan is? Lotje (talk) 14:33, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Photographs by van Buuren. Vysotsky (talk) 16:34, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

File rename

@Vysotsky: dit is duidelijk niet wat de file aangeeft. Wat denk je? Lotje (talk) 11:17, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

2 foto's met beschrijving door elkaar geschoven. Ik vraag de uploader even. Vysotsky (talk) 11:20, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
deze bedoel je waarschijnlijk Lotje (talk) 11:42, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Carl Joseph Kleingrothe

@Vysotsky: kunnen die afbeeldingen in one go ondergebracht worden in Category:Photographs by C.J. Kleingrothe? Thnks. Lotje (talk) 13:27, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Zeker. Maar zoals ik eerder meldde, ik heb geen ervaring met het via een bot toevoegen van categorieën aan grote aantallen afbeeldingen. Vysotsky (talk) 14:10, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Bij wie kan ik dan aankloppen? Ik wil je niet steeds lastigvallen.   Lotje (talk) 14:25, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
  Resolved

Category:Photographs by van Buuren

Only me again... ik was net bezig en hier deze category toegevoegd. Helemaal in orde lijkt het mij niet, of is er een verklaring voor dat de [[:Category::Photographs by Harry Pot|Harry Pot]] ook de auteur was? Wat te doen? Thnks. Lotje (talk) 14:01, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Ik snap hoe dat gekomen is. Ik heb nu 1 fotograaf verwijderd en de correcte fotograaf overgehouden. Dank voor het signaleren. Vysotsky (talk) 14:13, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Jan van den Brink

Betreft het hier dezelfde persoon denk je? Thnks. Lotje (talk) 14:23, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Zeker niet. Jan van den Brink was in 1949 Nederlands Minister van Economische Zaken, en xxx van den Brink was militair fotograaf in Indonesië. Voor die laatste maak ik binnenkort een categorie aan. Vysotsky (talk) 14:42, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Geef me een seintje wanneer je de category aanmaakte? Kan ik meteen de afbeeldingen toevoegen. Grts. Lotje (talk) 15:24, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
  Done
@Vysotsky: look what I came across: Photographer Brink, John coincidence?   Lotje (talk) 05:46, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Guess so. 2008 Washington vs. 1949 Indonesia. But thanks anyway. Vysotsky (talk) 08:37, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Off the record...

@Vysotsky: ik kan het niet laten hier een opmerking over te maken: die witte schoenen waarmee de kardinaal-legaat plots mee opstapt, die vind ik nergens terug op de andere afbeeldingen. Had hij plots last van jicht?   Lotje (talk) 14:47, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Oog voor detail! Categorie toegevoegd. Vysotsky (talk) 16:18, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Goed idee, maar vreemd blijft het toch. Vraag me af hoe ze dit klaarspeelden.   Lotje (talk) 12:03, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Henri Obreen

@Vysotsky: er zijn nogal wat foto's genomen door Henri Obreen en ik vroeg me af of het opportuun is een separate category aan te maken: Category:Photographs by Henri Obreen. Wat denk je? Lotje (talk) 12:00, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Helaas. De foto's zijn niet gemaakt door Henri Obreen, maar bij de drie steekproeven die ik deed volgens de bron "Uit een verzameling van 86 bladen met foto's bijeengebracht door H.G.A. Obreen". Dat kon ook moelijk anders, want de foto's die ik bekeek waren volgens de datering uit 1859 en 1860, en Obreen werd geboren in 1878. De metadata is ook verder nogal kreupel: de stad (voor zover ik kan zien meestal Leiden) wordt meestal niet vermeld in de Description of de Category, de categorieën zijn sowieso vaak niet aangebracht, de datering ("1 januari" 1860) kan opgeknapt. Het is vast een leuk klusje om deze 272 foto's rond Obreen in orde te maken. Gaat @EGehring hier nog iets aan doen? Vysotsky (talk) 12:22, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Added: Category:Obreen Collection. If you work on this collection, you need to look at the source of every photograph and consequently change year & photographer & license; add inventory number to source, add Department, add Category. See this example. Vysotsky (talk) 13:03, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Last note: I was wrong. Henri Obreen made most of these photographs himself. Leidsch Dagblad, 6 augustus 1977: "Rond de eeuwwisseling maakte de notariszoon Henri Obreen een reeks foto's van Leiden, waarin een wel zeer duidelijke sociale belangstelling naar voren komt. De bewoners van de stad en hun huisvesting hadden zijn bijzondere belangstelling en zijn foto's van de Leidse sloppen en hun bevolking geven aan het beeld van het oude Leiden weer een heel andere dimensie." My suggestion to carefully look at the description at the source still stands. Photographs dated ca. 1900 are probably made by Obreen himself. Vysotsky (talk) 13:27, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Da's een flinke boterham.   Lotje (talk) 15:17, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
@Vysotsky: in feite komt het erop neer dat een bot de afbeeldingen met "1 January 1860" obreen onderbrengt in de c:Category