Wikimedia Commons

User talk:Wilfredor/Archive 25

< User talk:Wilfredor
Latest comment: 2 years ago by QICbot in topic Quality Image Promotion


Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, 2003:45:5C6F:A801:50A4:A685:4B9:AC63 10:52, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Good as it Gets (7161540883).jpg

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Good as it Gets (7161540883).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Taivo (talk) 10:59, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rodrigolopes (talk) 22:07, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Eliminação

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Desculpe propor a eliminação de tantos arquivos de uma única vez, mas realmente me parecem fora de escopo. Rodrigolopes (talk) 22:12, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

@Rodrigolopes: Esquece ese asunto, você pode nominar a quantidade do que você quiser --The Photographer (talk) 13:35, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello again

Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hello The Photographer. First of all, thank you for the tips and help that you gave me for the previous file. So base on your advice, I decided to make the rectangles (that titles are located in) smaller and decided to use new color for this file. I used darker color because ,as you mentioned, those titles and rectangles subtracts prominence to the main design. Totally, thank you for putting time to check my file. So now if it is possible please give me some feedback and advice on this file. I will may nominate it so I will be glad to hear tips. Thank you Ali Zifan 06:05, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi @Ali Zifan: , thanks again for your feedback, and I've listed some things that I will mention below, remembering that it is just my opinion:
  1. Interfaphace (G2) , nucleolus is almost not visible
  2. The text is untranslatable because it is not an editable text in svg
  3. The upper rectangles have no function and I would suggest remove it and place the text strong.
  4. The description text of each phase is too large, this could be in the description or decrease the text
  5. You need to add a limitations that may define phase change, for example, a different background color, a different size or phases could are framed within a circle, for example this image

--The Photographer (talk) 13:47, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Nucleolus is visible now, texts are removed (I put them in description), rectangles are removed, and I draw some arrows to show phase changes. Thank you for the feedback and have a great day :) Ali Zifan 20:36, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Excellent, look most better, nice work, congratulations. --The Photographer (talk) 11:00, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Dominique 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality (however in full resolution - 77 Mpix - appears a bit unsharp, as if it is upscaled). --C messier 21:13, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
It was not upscaled, I think that its because the vertical perspective fix the top became a bit unsharp --Wilfredor 16:41, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Police du Québec,Manifestation anti-vaccins au Québec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments   Support Good quality--Lmbuga 20:36, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rivière Saint-Charles (Capitale-Nationale) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Commonists 12:10, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manifestation anti-vaccins au Québec 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
No problem to fix the verticals I think. --Ermell 21:07, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
done --Wilfredor 22:20, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 20:34, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wilfredor/Archive_25&oldid=696280641"
Return to the user page of "Wilfredor/Archive 25".