Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/December 2015

File:Seidla mõisa tuuleveski2.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2015 at 14:31:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Industry
Info all by Ivar (talk) 14:31, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 14:31, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:46, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 15:02, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Especially the clouds are very nice. --Laitche (talk) 15:08, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 16:22, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:42, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Needs, at least, more top and left space.--Fotoriety (talk) 22:28, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 06:11, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Where is Don Quixote? --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 06:44, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice image but I totally belie, Don Quixote was never in Estonia :) --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:39, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too grey IMO (in particular, the sky is undersaturated). Would support after a contrast boost. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info New version uploaded, but I have to say, that nothing on this image was deliberately desaturated. Since the left side of the windmill is already very bright, I had to adjust contrast-brightness only partially (and that was not easy task for me). --Ivar (talk) 07:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks ok. The shadow cast on the building's wall is nice. --Tremonist (talk) 15:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 03:30, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Industry

File:Black-winged stilt courtship behaviour.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2015 at 11:16:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes
Info Himantopus himantopus (Black-winged stilt). Created and uploaded by Ryzhkov Sergey - nominated by Christian Ferrer --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:16, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:16, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful couple! Photo looks artistic, effects are nicely done. Some might consider a crop, but in my opinion it's ok. --Tremonist (talk) 12:54, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really a beautiful scene! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:51, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 16:12, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Tremonist. Daniel Case (talk) 16:35, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 17:02, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 19:10, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:18, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Though I would support a crop at right. --Cayambe (talk) 07:39, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support The birds' heads are not in focus, but it is a nicely-composed picture. Charles (talk) 12:00, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 21:42, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 05:16, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- --Isasza (talk) 15:03, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:00, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
pile-on Support --El Grafo (talk) 13:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 20:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 15:17, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes

File:Ljungdalen October 2015 05.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2015 at 09:02:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info Abandoned farmhouses in Ljungdalen, a small village in Berg Municipality, Jämtland County, Swecden. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 09:02, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 09:02, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 13:34, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:40, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice colors, helped along by the grey sky. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 16:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:04, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:55, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:47, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 15:18, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Paris Notre-Dame Vaults 01.JPG, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2015 at 16:19:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info created by Uoaei1 - uploaded by Uoaei1 - nominated by Paris 16 -- Paris 16 (talk) 16:19, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 16:19, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Almost made my neck hurt looking at it ... Daniel Case (talk) 16:38, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Daniel. --Laitche (talk) 17:01, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 17:33, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 17:48, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:57, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Clean and very graphic, but a bit of sharpening would have been welcome to compensate the softness of the lens. Sting (talk) 20:47, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 22:35, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info The vaults are distorted in reality - check other images in the same category.— Preceding text originally posted on Commons:Quality images candidates by Uoaei1 (talk⋅contribs) 07:02, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:51, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:19, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 16:17, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 21:41, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 05:15, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support as author --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:16, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 01:17, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

File:2015.08.01.-04-Baggersee-Bruehl--Wasserminze.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2015 at 18:10:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 18:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hockei (talk) 18:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice color and detail. Daniel Case (talk) 22:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It is a technically decent photo (not great, but OK), but the subject is a mundane depiction of a common plant and is certainly not extraordinary enough to be FP. The sharpness is not very good either. dllu (t,c) 23:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support try a closer look, dllu, it´s special. --Hubertl 01:47, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:56, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per dllu. Background not blurred enough imo. --Kadellar (talk) 11:07, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Daniel. --Tremonist (talk) 14:58, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose QI, doesn't stand out among similar photos. — Julian H.^✈ 16:11, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Julian --El Grafo (talk) 13:19, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Hockei (talk) 18:22, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Albury railway station tracks and locomotive.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2015 at 13:19:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info The railway station at Albury, NSW, has one of the longest platforms in the southern hemisphere. I shot at midday to try and capture the mood of the Australian summer.
Info Created, uploaded and nominated by Thennicke -- Thennicke (talk) 13:19, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Thennicke (talk) 13:19, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'd prefer something like this, preferably in morning light. I think the station building is too pretty to not include it in the picture. --Kabelleger (talk) 18:27, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special here. I don't find the perspective convincing, the right part is to prominent.--Jebulon (talk) 21:55, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per other. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:35, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It does capture a hot summer day well. But that alone doesn't distinguish it from so many other pictures of tracks converging with a few cars on them, seen from just overhead downline from a station. It's a QI, but not striking enough to be an FP (the picture Kabellerger linked to, OTOH, has me asking why it hasn't been nominated for FP). And if the long platform is meant to be something we're supposed to take note of here, the image fails because it isn't the first thing we think of. Daniel Case (talk) 03:15, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the detailed feedback. I'll keep those points in mind next time. -- Thennicke (talk) 10:16, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Socotra dragon tree.JPG edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2015 at 22:38:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: [[Commons:Featured pictures/<add the category here>]]
Info created by (User:Boriskhv - uploaded by User:Boriskhv - nominated by محمد بوعلام عصامي *«Md.Boualam»

-- محمد بوعلام عصامي *«Md.Boualam» (talk) 22:38, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Nomination and support محمد بوعلام عصامي *«Md.Boualam» (talk) 22:38, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: it's way below of the required 2 megapixels --Ivar (talk) 06:19, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:MergellusAlbellusTakeOff.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2015 at 21:24:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Info created and uploaded by Thermos - nominated by Σπάρτακος -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:24, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:24, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nice scene, but much too dark; unfortunate lighting. --Kadellar (talk) 22:57, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Kadellar ; sorry. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:36, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Version 2 is current FP, this nom is delist and replace? --Laitche (talk) 12:04, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Tremonist (talk) 16:19, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I think my suiggested crop would take care of the perception that it's too dark. Daniel Case (talk) 20:05, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:41, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:13-02-27-spielbank-wiesbaden-by-RalfR-093.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2015 at 10:28:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info Spielbank Wiesbaden, Roulette - all by Ralf Roleček
Support -- Ralf Roleček 10:28, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Askew. --Laitche (talk) 13:26, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- This is intentional, and I wanted it that way. The view is greatly reduced from the upper, it is not appropriate to distort this. --Ralf Roleček 13:42, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - I know, it's just a comment not a vote (not a minus factor in this case) ;-) --Laitche (talk) 13:48, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support very good fixed shoot. "0" my successful and favorite number for roulette, for ever! ;-) --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:24, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition. --Tremonist (talk) 16:16, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:49, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 21:41, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is one to bet on ... . Something we don't usually see here. Daniel Case (talk) 22:09, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 23:16, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:50, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice colors, composition works. --Laitche (talk) 08:32, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Laitche. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 05:13, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 06:25, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:29, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 13:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:51, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:45, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:Autumn leaf (Doleschallia bisaltide) Bali I.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2015 at 11:50:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
Info all by Charlesjsharp -- Charles (talk) 11:50, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charles (talk) 11:50, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:38, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful! --Tremonist (talk) 16:14, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 21:40, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent composition and colors. Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:10, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Seems to me that it could be a little less processed, although maybe it's the best we can do given the situation. Daniel Case (talk) 06:45, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:00, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- --Isasza (talk) 14:56, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:33, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:50, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 20:11, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support You are the hunter of the real existing treasuries of this world.--Hubertl 00:21, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 17:27, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:43, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera

Image:Highfield - American Authors.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2015 at 10:56:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info American Authors Singer Zachary Barnett - all by menschenmaterial

Support -- Menschenmaterial (talk) 10:56, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 13:45, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 13:57, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:20, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:37, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 16:15, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Great concert portrait! Diliff (talk) 16:29, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 21:39, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 23:15, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:51, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great expression, great shot. Daniel Case (talk) 06:42, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Quite good, but it would be even better with a crop on the right to use the rule of third. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:24, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:09, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 05:12, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:30, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 13:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:44, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

File:2015.07.16.-16-Viernheim--Grosse Wolfsfliege-Weibchen.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2015 at 18:03:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Diptera#Family_:_Asilidae_.28Robber_flies.29
Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 18:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hockei (talk) 18:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support One very small blown area, but at this scale who cares? The rest is excellent. Daniel Case (talk) 22:44, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 03:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:29, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Yann (talk) 10:59, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:57, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great natural scene. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:15, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not super-sharp, but brilliant photo. Charles (talk) 11:54, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 21:45, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:36, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:59, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Diptera

File:Cultural Fashion and Adornment, El Moez St., 00 (65).JPG, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2015 at 19:53:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info created, uploaded and nominated by User:لا روسا.-- لا روسا (talk) 19:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- لا روسا (talk) 19:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Another two versions here and here.--لا روسا (talk) 20:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose IMO this picture is not even QI. Sorry. See the necklesses in the foreground. --Hubertl 09:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Image too confusing. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, لا روسا, I liked the idea, nice colours, however the lack of technical skills used here produced a low quality result, and you was not parallel to the plane of your subject, creating this weird look, you also needed a chromatic aberrations correction in post production. -- RTA 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful oppose per Roderigo. Daniel Case (talk) 16:19, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Tremonist (talk) 16:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support i like it --Bachounda (talk) 13:38, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- It's interesting ----Isasza (talk) 14:52, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Nice colors despite CAs. --Laitche (talk) 17:27, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 22:00, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Macrolepiota procera 2013 G1.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2015 at 19:42:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi
Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info Parasol mushroom. Photo taken in a very dark forest with a flash + softbox and tripod. Dark background gives a good isolation of the main object.
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 23:25, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:21, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice detail where it counts. I think you handled the lighting challenges as well as you could have been expected to. Daniel Case (talk) 16:17, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 16:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 16:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:44, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:37, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:54, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Clean photograph, but for a FPC I think it lacks volume: the softbox is either really too small or too far, and it's almost frontal. Sting (talk) 20:57, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral It's not bad at all, the quality is very high and it's useful and even has some atmosphere. Still a single-light photo of a non-moving subject. Even with just one light available, two exposures with different light positions could be blended together. — Julian H.^✈ 21:58, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:29, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry, the light is too strong. --Ralf Roleček 22:04, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 22:00, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Fungi

File:Scenery of the pond at Shitennō-ji Honbō Park in Osaka, November 2015.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2015 at 19:16:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info c/u/n by Laitche (talk) 19:16, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Laitche (talk) 19:16, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support wonderful autumnal colors --Ralf Roleček 19:55, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 21:40, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:43, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support a very interesting view, indeed! --Hubertl 23:11, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! One of the best candidates in the last times! We surely have an artist among us, bravo! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:08, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:31, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support A really impressive picture! Go for it: Viel Glück! --Alsterdrache (talk) 12:48, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Can't say anything anybody else hasn't already said. Daniel Case (talk) 17:04, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Like an impressionistic painting. Awesome. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 05:04, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support it's stunning in colors and reflecting ----Isasza (talk) 10:19, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:36, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very special! --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:52, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support But no, Claude Monet was not Japanese !! 😶--Jebulon (talk) 22:07, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:28, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. --Tremonist (talk) 13:12, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 15:37, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:58, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Animated Flyover of Pluto’s Icy Mountain and Plains.ogv, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2015 at 02:53:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy
Info created by NASA - uploaded by User:LuisArmandoRasteletti - nominated by LuisArmandoRasteletti
Support -- LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I do not feel qualified to comment or vote for this photo, I am sorry --The Photographer (talk) 12:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support It has a certain EV and that's what I am voting for here. --Tremonist (talk) 16:37, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 03:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:27, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ambrogio de Predis - Bianca Maria Sforza - Google Art Project.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2015 at 05:26:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
Info created by Giovanni Ambrogio de Predis - uploaded by DcoetzeeBot - nominated by Pine -- Pine^✉ 05:26, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pine^✉ 05:26, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:16, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quality digitization. Daniel Case (talk) 23:01, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:59, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:35, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:46, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 13:19, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- --Isasza (talk) 14:54, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 21:44, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:37, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:48, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:15, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 15:37, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:46, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media

File:MSMajestyOfTheSeasEdit1.JPG, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2015 at 07:27:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport
Info Featured picture on 3 Encyclopedias.created by JJ Harrison - uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 -- ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:27, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The image is credited to MattWade, not the noninator. Please amend nomination appropriately. Daniel Case (talk) 05:14, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:27, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The right side should have less free space than the left to give the composition balance.--Fotoriety (talk) 22:28, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Per Fotoriety. I would add that space to the left should be more important. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:47, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Fotoriety and Medium69. Moreover CA on both sides. -- Wolf im Wald 20:22, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. -- Pofka (talk) 21:45, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per others. --Tremonist (talk) 13:17, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:45, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palo Alto Baylands January 2013 001.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2015 at 05:38:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Industry
Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:38, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:38, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:34, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 15:14, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The wires at the top and the object in the lower left part spoil it for me, but I think I would support it if you could remove the latter. --Code (talk) 16:01, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Personally, I think the object in the lower left adds a nice touch, to counterbalance the right-heavy composition. And given that this is a picture of power lines, I don't see how the lines themselves are avoidable. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:49, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:02, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per King's response to Code. Daniel Case (talk) 04:51, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 07:11, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 08:49, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the composition. -- Thennicke (talk) 10:34, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:12, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 19:13, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 21:44, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 22:02, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:16, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 15:37, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:46, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Industry

File:Mazet in vineyards. Cessenon-sur-Orb 01.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2015 at 17:54:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info All by me. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:54, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:54, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- --Isasza (talk) 10:17, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful. Really well captured. -- Thennicke (talk) 10:32, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:48, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:50, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 13:05, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support For some reason the placement of the mazet just makes it for me. Daniel Case (talk) 17:00, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 21:46, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 20:09, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice atmosphere. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:13, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:18, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 03:23, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Downtown Pittsburgh from Duquesne Incline in the morning.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2015 at 22:54:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes or Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles
Info created by dllu - uploaded by dllu - nominated by Dllu -- dllu (t,c) 22:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- dllu (t,c) 22:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:43, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Brilliant lighting. Sharpness could be better but fine with me. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:18, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks. Regarding the sharpness, it was a trade-off between depth of field (f/7.1 or better is needed), sharpness (lens is best at f/11), motion blur of the funicular car (1/200 s or faster is needed to freeze it), and image noise (less than ISO 800 is needed). There has also been some loss of sharpness due to perspective correction and barrel distortion correction, but I am pleased with the quality in general, and I'm glad you agree. I had to catch the 5:30 am bus in the early morning to get this lighting... File:Downtown Pittsburgh from Duquesne Incline at dawn.jpg is a picture of the sunrise 23 minutes earlier. (the EXIF data is 1 hour behind the local time because I forgot to adjust it for daylight savings time). dllu (t,c) 03:39, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:12, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:33, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition. --Laitche (talk) 06:58, 25 November 2015 (UTC) I voted for this version... --Laitche (talk) 16:12, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:56, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light, brilliant composition. Yann (talk) 10:56, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry,is sure nice in thumb but not very sharp. LivioAndronico ^(talk) 14:04, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. --Tremonist (talk) 14:59, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Very regretful oppose I love the idea of shooting this oft-shot view in sometime other than broad daylight in the summertime (I have a refrigerator magnet of that view, as I have some relatives in Mt. Lebanon whom I occasionally visit there). And I appreciate what you've done to make this presentable here. But I agree with Livio that it may have suffered from that work in sharpness at some key points in the picture. Daniel Case (talk) 16:07, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks perfectly sharp to me at 6MP and even higher resolutions. — Julian H.^✈ 16:24, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Dllu, do yourself a favour and buy Lightroom instead of faffing around with free stuff that still leaves the picture with loads of colour noise. At ISO 400 I would not expect this much noise from a modern full frame camera. Also, if you significantly change the image after nominating (as you have) then you really should ping those who voted earlier to check they are ok with the new version. -- Colin (talk) 18:22, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Colin, it is incredibly rude of you to dismiss the hard work of others as "faffing around". On Wikimedia Commons, of all places, I would expect people to realize the superiority of free licenses --- not only for photographs, but for software as well. The reason for the noise is that the shadows were very underexposed. Take a look at the raw file and see for yourself. dllu (t,c) 01:40, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Good, but IMO the image should be improved. At the bridge top right are CAs. --XRay ^talk 20:04, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Hubertl 22:53, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Too dark IMO. The other version is much better but with too much noise reduction applied unfortunately. --Code (talk) 06:22, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice and sharping is OK for me --Pudelek (talk) 16:56, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unsharp --Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:30, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support It seems like you put a lot of thought into this shot, with pleasing results. Sharpness is fine, all things considered. -- Thennicke (talk) 13:28, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 21:44, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Current (01:50, 26 November 2015) version is overprocessed IMO and which votes and comments are for which version? and who confirm this nomination?... I think you better close (withdraw) this nomination once and renominate it (but only one photo which you think the best) from the first. --Laitche (talk) 19:25, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very nice mood, but it's sadly overprocessed (with washed out details on trees). First version was better, only a bit overexposed. --Ivar (talk) 06:23, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, I cannot support current version, obviously overprocessed. --Laitche (talk) 06:57, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative edit

Info @ArionEstar, King of Hearts, Johann Jaritz, Martin Falbisoner, Laitche, Medium69, Yann, Tremonist, Christian Ferrer, Julian Herzog, Daniel Case, Colin, and XRay: , I've replaced the original file with the original white balance from the camera, and also uploaded a new version with a warmer white balance. Both versions have been corrected for chromatic aberrations and denoised. Can you vote for which version you prefer? Thanks! dllu (t,c) 01:56, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- dllu (t,c) 01:56, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very nice view but too much noise reduction. The picture looks like a painting. --Code (talk) 06:21, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose overprocessed, sorry --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:11, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Martin. Also sorry. --Tremonist (talk) 12:49, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 16:45, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes

The chosen alternative is: File:Downtown Pittsburgh from Duquesne Incline in the morning.jpg

File:N°3 HAÏK.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2015 at 12:11:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Portrait
Info created by Mus52 - uploaded by Mus52 - nominated by Vikoula5 -- Vikoula5 (talk) 12:11, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Super portrait of a woman in the street of Algiers.-- Vikoula5 (talk) 12:11, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes! Great creative composition with the other women in the background looking different directions. Yann (talk) 15:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Yann. --Tremonist (talk) 15:24, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support We need more nominations like this. Thanks @Vikoula5: and author --The Photographer (talk) 15:39, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 16:46, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:59, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Aaaaand seven. Another shot I would expect to see in a National Geographic article. Daniel Case (talk) 18:41, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition. Very good quality. Interesting subject of the photo. --KSK (talk) 13:12, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose face completely in shadow. White clothing blown. I don't know if Moire effect is fixable either. --Kadellar (talk) 15:41, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Needs post-processing. Sting (talk) 20:36, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 22:45, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Bachounda (talk) 13:42, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral very nice image, the exposition at top prevent me to support. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:08, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good composition, but the quality is not up to it (overexposed parts and moire pattern), sorry. --Ivar (talk) 06:19, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alt version edit

Info I tried "fix" vigheting, wb and shadowns --The Photographer (talk) 19:59, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Photographer (talk) 19:59, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great shot in general; this is the better version for me. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:06, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I can support both versions. --Tremonist (talk) 12:46, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose face in shadow. White clothing blown. I don't know if Moire effect is fixable either. --Kadellar (talk) 15:41, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Kadellar: Not sure if you mean that one, but the moiré on the fabric in front of the face is actually "real" moiré I think, from two layers of fabric overlapping, so you'd see that with your eyes as well. It doesn't seem to be a camera artifact. I agree with your other points. — Julian H.^✈ 20:51, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - +1 --Hubertl 22:44, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 16:07, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:30, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Vikoula5 (talk) 17:06, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:52, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Post-processing went too far. Sting (talk) 20:37, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support verry nice photo --Bachounda (talk) 13:27, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Looks way too unnatural. -- Pofka (talk) 21:44, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Spent some time thinking about this now, I think the processing is too strong for a portrait. — Julian H.^✈ 23:11, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I spent a considerable amount of time trying to "fix" respecting the original. If possible, I would appreciate receiving any additional information about what is wrong. Thanks :) --The Photographer (talk) 23:44, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- My main concern is that the skin tone looks very different to me from the original. — Julian H.^✈ 09:05, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the other version is better. --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:49, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 16:47, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

The chosen alternative is: File:N°3 HAÏK.jpg

File:Oasis de Huacachina, Ica, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 18.JPG, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2015 at 10:31:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info Huacachina oasis, Ica Region, Peru. The location has a population of 115 and is built around a natural lake in the desert and is a popular destination for sandboarding and buggy riding. All by me, Poc o² 10:31, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 10:31, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- --Isasza (talk) 15:01, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 22:00, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:18, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:19, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:40, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:43, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:53, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:12, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:22, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 16:37, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 05:34, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 16:42, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Bydgoszcz, Przystań Bydgoszcz, okna.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2015 at 18:53:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info Marina Bydgoszcz, hotel windows. All by me -- 1bumer (talk) 18:53, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 1bumer (talk) 18:53, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The angle of view does not bother me, but I would have liked an image with a larger angle in height. Perhaps the same image but would have been framed in height. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:26, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Moderate support Great detail and texture ... looks better at full resolution. Daniel Case (talk) 17:55, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I saw it at full resolution, and I do not question the quality, but I would have preferred a portrait mode. That said, I do not even know if it would have been better. This is mostly a question. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:30, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Has a certain mysterious quality. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:09, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very nice subject and interesting composition, but the lack of sharpness at the right keeps me from supporting. Sorry. --Code (talk) 06:14, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Daniel and King. --Tremonist (talk) 13:26, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 13:36, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like clear structures.--Hubertl 16:29, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The angle is not optimal for this subject IMO but reaching the FP bar. --Laitche (talk) 17:49, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:48, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:31, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support ciekawe --Pudelek (talk) 20:59, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:32, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Ceiling of Palazzo Barberini.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2015 at 14:00:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Info The Allegory of Divine Providence and Barberini Power is a fresco by Italian painter Pietro da Cortona, filling the large ceiling of the grand salon of the Palazzo Barberini in Rome, Italy. Begun in 1633, it was nearly finished in three years; upon Cortona's return from Venice, it was extensively reworked to completion in 1639. The Palazzo, since the 1620s, had been the palatial home of the Barberini family headed by Maffeo Barberini, by then Urban VIII, who had launched an extensive program of refurbishment of the city with art and architecture.Dedicated to Jebulon, you love these bees (Of course you are free to oppose, it isn't said that my bees were shooting well!). All by LivioAndronico ^(talk) 14:00, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LivioAndronico ^(talk) 14:00, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment need a tilt. 5 s review. -- RTA 15:28, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand Rodrigo,can you explain me better? Cw or ccw? Obligado LivioAndronico ^(talk) 22:22, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral I will probably !vote support if this issue can be resolved. Support OK, I am now. Daniel Case (talk) 00:23, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Neutral~~ I agree with Daniel. Support Ok now. --Tremonist (talk) 12:50, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New version RTA,Daniel Case and Tremonist. Better? Thanks LivioAndronico ^(talk) 13:08, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 16:10, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:30, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 16:20, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 21:43, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 09:57, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:31, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:35, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

Info Demoted/Delisted to not featured per this consensus. --Cart (talk) 14:14, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Copper Mine Museum in Falun.JPG, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2015 at 14:55:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 14:55, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 14:55, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support for me, it's a very clear, almost abstract work. Very fine! --Hubertl 22:50, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose If it were just the building, I'd support. But this angle takes in the front kiosks, and there's significant clipping there. Daniel Case (talk) 00:28, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per both. --Tremonist (talk) 12:52, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 15:11, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Daniel ; sorry. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 16:09, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

* Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:30, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ralf Roleček 13:47, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:26, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Info Demoted to 'not featured' due to sock double vote. 4 October 2018. --Cart (talk) 18:59, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 18:59, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heinamaa Rihkama külas.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2015 at 17:31:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
Info all by Ivar (talk) 17:31, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 17:31, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:57, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 20:00, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I don't like the sky on the right and the street too.(If you crop I can support) For the rest Support very good LivioAndronico ^(talk) 22:33, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Info new version with small crop uploaded. --Ivar (talk) 07:03, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Moderate support Really can't find anything too wrong with it, and it's a nice scene. Daniel Case (talk) 05:28, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:53, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 16:12, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality problems in the sky on the right. Not a very interesting scene or composition to me. — Julian H.^✈ 19:11, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:30, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:34, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas

File:Italian States-Venice (1779-89) 50 Zecchini.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2015 at 18:08:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Money & Seals
Info created by Zecca (mint), Republic of Venice, scan courtesy of the U.S. National Numismatic Collection, National Museum of American History, of the Smithsonian Institution - uploaded by Godot13 - nominated by Pine -- Pine^✉ 18:08, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pine^✉ 18:08, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:47, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 21:42, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Godot13 (talk) 21:44, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:25, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:43, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pretty golden coins. Daniel Case (talk) 17:19, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:09, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:25, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 15:35, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:33, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:20151030 Syrians and Iraq refugees arrive at Skala Sykamias Lesvos Greece.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2015 at 22:54:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info created by Ggia - uploaded by Ggia - nominated by Ggia -- Ggia (talk) 22:54, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support check also [1] or [2] or [3] - this boat on the news.. -- Ggia (talk) 22:54, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality, great historical wow. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:02, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Per others. Great photojournalism, and it's good that we have something like this as a free image. I love the determination and immediacy that come out in full-res. Daniel Case (talk) 05:38, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support absolutely --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:14, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 07:57, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 12:46, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:48, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:47, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 15:43, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 16:12, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Daniel C. --Yann (talk) 16:24, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Technical good but not the best. Otherwise: Per Daniel Case. --XRay ^talk 17:35, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 19:12, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Good but CAs and the focus seems to be on the man in the water (but it's ok for the boat). Lacks strength in the composition to be a really good photojournalism/reportage image => QI. ~~Completely off topic: it's interesting to note that there are only three women and three children visible on that boat.~~ Sting (talk) 20:57, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly is interesting on that? --Hubertl 22:38, 26 November 2015 (UTC) [reply]

Comment Sting Please show me where is the CAs in order to correct them. During raw process I tried to minimize any CA. But the lens used, Nikon 50mm/f1,8 usually don't give CAs. In this boat were around ~150 people, and the majority of them where families with women, kids and also babies. I you want to see demographics (men/women) of refugees influx you have to search for specialized reports. This boat (it is not visible) it is overcrowded inside with people.. and usually women and babies are travelling inside. For example in this video [4] you can see scenes from an inflatable boat arriving to Greece. All the women sit down, in the middle of the boat, "for safely reasons" and visible in the footage are only men sitting at the edge of the boat. But you can see also a kid there 00:35. Ggia (talk) 11:31, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for those information! I indicated now the few visible CA by annotation. I slightly modified the text of my vote above because it might be misunderstood: it's not the few CA or the focus that make me consider your image not as a FP but as a QI, but the composition. Sting (talk) 15:04, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Sting I don't it is right to criticize composition here. This is not an artistic shot, but photo-journalism. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:13, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I tried to upload a more enhanced version. Yann I agree partially with the comments of Sting. May-be this photo is not a good candidate for a Word Press Contest.. but neither the majority of the featured pictures here will get a National Geography award if they will be nominated to a corresponding contest. From the composition point of view I like in the foreground the man with the yamaha life-jacket rising the hand, the man swimming and in the background the overcrowded with people boat. This photo has enough technical quality but the most important is the content/subject. It has high EV, it enough descriptive and making it a featured picture will make it appear in the front page of commons (and may-be more people will be aware about the refugee issue). Ggia (talk) 15:38, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Γλαύκος ^{shoot it} 11:22, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 21:42, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Info I just uploaded a photo of the same boat, one minute before this scene. The nominated photo is shot 08:35:17 and this one is shot at 08:34:07. Ggia (talk) 20:45, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the other photo with the leaning boat is far much better IMO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:57, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree too: easier to understand what's happening. Just reduce the saturation, it's too high imo. May be a little sharpening? Sting (talk) 22:50, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ioannis Protonotarios (talk) 19:54, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 05:36, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 16:04, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

File:CR HXD1 Yuanlong.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2015 at 19:18:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles
Info all by Kabelleger -- Kabelleger (talk) 19:18, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment One of my favourites from China and definitely the luckiest shot. Two freight trains, both hauled by HXD1 locomotives, meet on the Longhai line east of Tianshui.
Comment This picture can only convey part of the mind-boggling pace at which the Chinese are building railway infrastructure. These two bridges were probably built in the last 15 years, to replace an old line; and it's not just these two. The whole valley is litterally littered with bridges of this style and size (ok, these are some of the longest). But that's not enough; now they're also building a new high-speed line straight through the mountains on the right!
Abstain as author. -- Kabelleger (talk) 19:18, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support lucky moment, indeed! Good work too! --Hubertl 00:13, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very cool! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:28, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:36, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 03:25, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 04:47, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:06, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 06:12, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 06:21, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ideally it would be sharper at distance, but what's here and in focus is good enough to not worry about that. Daniel Case (talk) 06:28, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:18, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 13:34, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:35, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support very impressive images! but why are they building single track bridges?--ArildV (talk) 16:04, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I don't know, but I guess that the two bridges were built a few years apart. The track on the right has larger radii throughout, which suggests that it's newer. --Kabelleger (talk) 19:13, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Like a model railway. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 16:27, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hockei (talk) 18:35, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really nice. --Gyrostat (talk) 11:31, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 15:34, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 05:29, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:14, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 11:11, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 03:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles

File:Dactylorhiza incarnata ochroleuca - Niitvälja bog.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2015 at 15:55:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
Info Cream-flowered early marsh orchid. Niitvälja Bog, Northwestern Estonia. All by Ivar (talk) 15:55, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 15:55, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 20:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fine! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:29, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:36, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice contrast. Daniel Case (talk) 06:18, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light. --Laitche (talk) 06:25, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support perfect lighting! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:16, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:06, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald 09:18, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful! --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:05, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:35, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support not really exceptionell, but very good made.--Hubertl 16:27, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Uoaei1. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 16:29, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 15:34, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:14, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 20:04, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 03:18, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants

File:Llano de Ucanca.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2015 at 10:52:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info all by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald 10:52, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald 10:52, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support There's a certain strangeness about deserts in full midday sun; I like it. There might be a touch of oversharpening? Either way, it isn't bad enough to affect my vote. -- Thennicke (talk) 12:04, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:57, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:34, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support In all this detail, can't find a reason to oppose. Daniel Case (talk) 03:12, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 03:24, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 07:01, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support A landscape photo taken at noon that actually works - wow! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:15, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:34, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 13:35, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 16:30, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 02:48, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:14, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 03:19, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Mosaic of Santa Croce in Gerusalemme (Rome).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2015 at 08:29:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Info All by LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:29, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:29, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:01, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:53, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 21:49, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 00:44, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:02, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:21, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 16:39, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support not bad --Mile (talk) 19:13, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 03:21, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

File:Stift Seitenstetten Abteistiege Deckenfresko 01.JPG, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2015 at 09:59:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Austria
Info Ceiling fresco of the Abbey's Staircase at Seitenstetten Abbey (Lower Austria) by Bartolomeo Altomonte (1744): Triumph of St. Benedict. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:59, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Uoaei1 (talk) 09:59, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Great interior! Super colorful! Beautiful! Nice! Good! Excellent! Perfect symmetry! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:37, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald 10:58, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 14:23, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:53, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:39, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:34, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 03:22, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:14, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:34, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 16:31, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 15:35, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 21:34, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:15, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 03:20, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Austria

File:Ascensor del Monte de San Pedro, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 113.JPG, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2015 at 22:29:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles
Info Panoramic lift to St Peter's Hill, La Coruña, Spain. The lift operates since 2007 and the length of the served drive is 100 m and a height of 63 m. All by me, Poc o² 22:29, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 22:29, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:41, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice, but could you fix the CA at the top please? -- Wolf im Wald 00:46, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Waiting for the correction. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:37, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Neutral~~ per Medium. Support Ok now. --Tremonist (talk) 16:23, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Der Wolf im Wald, Medium69, and Tremonist: CA corrected Poc o² 17:02, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Could be sharper up top, and in bottom corners, but the bottom terminal is the subject and it's done right. Daniel Case (talk) 20:08, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Da sind Halos um die Berge oben, sieht man sogar im thumb. --Ralf Roleček 20:56, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ralf, es sollte in der aktuellen Version nicht mehr so auffallen Poc o² 22:56, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
weak support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:35, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald 16:28, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:59, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 22:02, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support passt. --Hubertl 00:22, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 14:14, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles

File:Mosque Chuah Naz 00 (43).JPG, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2015 at 23:12:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: [[Commons:Featured pictures/<Arabesque>]]
Info created by لا روسا - uploaded by لا روسا - nominated by محمد بوعلام عصامي *«Md.Boualam»
Support Nomination and support--محمد بوعلام عصامي *«Md.Boualam» (talk) 23:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sharp. --Berthold Werner (talk) 09:39, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Berthold. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:13, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Tremonist (talk) 13:40, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. Daniel Case (talk) 18:47, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose unsharp + chromatic abberation (= CA). --Alchemist-hp (talk) 00:02, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 14:15, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Suricata suricatta (Suricate) - 438.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2015 at 12:23:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Medium69 -- Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:23, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:23, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Design and cropping ideal. --Ralf Roleček 13:45, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support dito. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:17, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:39, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It is important please voters to check existing FPs, although this image is in a category of one making that a bit more difficult. There are several meerkat FPs in the Category:Suricata suricatta which are of higher quality and are not in a zoo setting. Charles (talk)
Support It still looks nice and I can also accept a photo in a zoo setting. These animals are really funny and we can have more than one photo of them I think. --Tremonist (talk) 16:11, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Of course meerkats are cute, but the image must be 'the finest on Commons'. Charles (talk) 16:51, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In the category, there are other good and interesting photos that are not FP yet, it appears, I'd thus like to thank you, Charles, for giving us this hint. What do you think, how many 'finest' meerkats could possibly be accepted?

--Tremonist (talk) 16:55, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

quite a few if they are all showing something special and are all FP quality - male; female; juveniles; groups; eating, fighting; mating; digging; standing on trees/rocks/people/each other etc! Charles (talk) 18:08, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Charles. Point of view much too high imo. --Kadellar (talk) 20:02, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Charles. Background is way too distracting, especially with the animal having similar colors. Daniel Case (talk) 17:03, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- --Isasza (talk) 14:59, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I love those little fellas, but among all the Meerkat shots I've seen so far, this is neither particularly droll nor photographically outstanding. --El Grafo (talk) 13:10, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per El Grafo -- Colin (talk) 21:44, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 14:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:2013.08.02.-12-Kirschgartshaeuser Schlaege Mannheim-Suedliche Mosaikjungfer-Maennchen.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2015 at 18:26:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family_:_Aeshnidae_.28Hawker_dragonflies.29
Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 18:26, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hockei (talk) 18:26, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 19:01, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice but the wings are out of F LivioAndronico ^(talk) 20:15, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just as an annotation. It's not QIC. But if you mean that this is the crucial point to be a FP or not for you, so then. --Hockei (talk) 20:48, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

weak support You have right Hockei and I apologize, I was too severe. The wings are just a lesser sin than the rest of the picture LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:00, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Convincing. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 06:16, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:46, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 07:01, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support impressive sharpness --Hubertl 10:31, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:37, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I like the triangle; wish the wings could all have been in focus but I've seen too many of these macros to think that they realistically could. Daniel Case (talk) 18:45, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:20, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charles (talk) 18:07, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:11, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:25, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 20:02, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:55, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Odonata

File:3DPrinted biliary system 20151201.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2015 at 19:29:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info created by Nevit Dilmen - uploaded by Nevit Dilmen - nominated by Nevit -- Nevit Dilmen (talk) 19:29, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Nevit Dilmen (talk) 19:29, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry DoF 2,6 isn't enough for me and too small LivioAndronico ^(talk) 20:13, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sharp enough. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:04, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Interesting topic, but per others, sorry. --Tremonist (talk) 14:36, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. Daniel Case (talk) 18:48, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Isn't it a bit strange to cast a (positive) vote for your own picture, Nevit Dilmen? --GeoTrinity (talk) 02:01, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 21:33, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bolkar Blue - Polyommatus molleti.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2015 at 17:10:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
Info Polyommatus molleti (Bolkar blues). Created and uploaded by Zcebeci - nominated by Christian Ferrer --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:10, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:10, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful. --Laitche (talk) 17:44, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 18:11, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 18:42, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice,I like the ant Spying LivioAndronico ^(talk) 20:16, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:09, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support And seven. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:12, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:48, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice couple. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 06:17, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 10:30, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:38, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 15:33, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 18:36, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support useful to 'add a note' on image indicating which is male and which female. Charles (talk) 18:05, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:11, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 22:36, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 20:02, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:55, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera

File:Donbas U500 2012 G1.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2015 at 20:59:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport
Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:59, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info Navy of Ukraine. U500 Donbas - Amur class (Project 304), now command ship.
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:59, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 22:38, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support ==Pudelek (talk) 23:47, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:05, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 06:12, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 10:28, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:34, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:51, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:42, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 21:21, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice colors and in focus. Daniel Case (talk) 02:19, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 20:30, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 11:52, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:10, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:56, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport

File:Varanus bengalensis - 02.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2015 at 20:00:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles
Info Wild Bengal monitor (Varanus bengalensis) in Yala National Park, Sri Lanka. Those things in the head and leg are from the pond in which the monitor was 5 min before. Created, uploaded, nominated by -- Kadellar (talk) 20:00, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kadellar (talk) 20:00, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:42, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This is a nice image, but is not sharp enough for FP and the colours are not so good. Charles (talk) 21:56, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sharp enough. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:33, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Charles; too much of the animal unsharp. Daniel Case (talk) 22:59, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per others, sorry. But the head seems to be sharp and looks nice and the photo looks quite interesting even with its mixture of sharp and unsharp areas, even applied on the animal alone. --Tremonist (talk) 13:15, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 21:31, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hôtel des Invalides - 20150801 16h09 (10630).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2015 at 11:59:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Medium69 -- Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:59, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:59, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for now. Tilted. -Kadellar (talk) 15:13, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done I fixed a little rotation and distortion. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 15:33, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Kadellar: it is still inclined? --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:38, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ercé (talk) 16:29, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment ~~Still tilted. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:27, 28 November 2015 (UTC)~~[reply]
Provisional support Excellent detail work and cityscape ... I hope that tilt can be corrected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:54, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@ArionEstar: @Kadellar: I refined the tilt correction. If you see a problem, help me to tell me where. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:26, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Done. Thanks. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:46, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 21:45, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 22:01, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:38, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 12:38, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:44, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 20:10, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:17, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:56, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:14-02-02-straszburg-RalfR-113.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2015 at 14:18:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lycée int pontonniers, Straßburg, France

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info Lycée int pontonniers, Straßburg, France - all by Ralf Roleček
Support -- Ralf Roleček 14:18, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice ensemble of buildings, good reflections and colours. --Tremonist (talk) 14:33, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:44, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:59, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:59, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice colors; could have less noise but it's acceptable. Daniel Case (talk) 03:33, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:21, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please remove the round dustspot at the left of the spire of the building at right. --Cayambe (talk) 11:16, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Done --Ralf Roleček 18:32, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 12:42, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:09, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 20:00, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:15, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Cannenburger gat. Locatie, Kroondomein 04.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2015 at 16:49:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info Cannenburger gat. Location, Kroondomein (Netherlands). created by Famberhorst - uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Famberhorst -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:49, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:49, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow for me. Daniel Case (talk) 06:57, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- --Isasza (talk) 10:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Vagueness. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:48, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support. I actually find the composition quite refreshing. The weak is for the slight unsharpness at 8 MP. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:15, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support --Tremonist (talk) 13:18, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 20:49, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lighting not special. Don't understand the crop/framing choice. -- Colin (talk) 21:47, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 21:20, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:MS Nordnorge, Hurtigruten in Raftsundet, Nordland, Norway, 2015 September.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2015 at 15:32:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport
Info created, uploaded & nominated by Ximonic -- Ximonic (talk) 15:32, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ximonic (talk) 15:32, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Very nice -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:40, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per George. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:49, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 16:28, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:44, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good image quality, great light. --Kabelleger (talk) 17:40, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 18:30, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 21:52, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 00:19, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:59, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 01:51, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support very good lighting and composition --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:23, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 06:38, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Martin. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 12:40, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:51, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:50, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hockei (talk) 20:13, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 20:28, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:09, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 11:13, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Claus 04:21, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:14, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport

File:20151029 Inflatable boat with Syrian Refugees Skala Sykamias Lesvos Greece.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2015 at 20:52:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info created by Ggia - uploaded by Ggia - nominated by Ggia -- Ggia (talk) 20:52, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ggia (talk) 20:52, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Info just to get the scale of the refugee issue... in the photo to the right 5 boats are arriving simultaneously to Lesvos island (3 are in the foreground and 2 in the background - if you see full screen the photo you can see 2 in the background). Ggia (talk) 20:57, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Sorry but there are images not outstanding for me,maybe for a newspaper LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:33, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow for me. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:50, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The "I'm the king of the world!" pose notwithstanding, this isn't as good as the other one. Daniel Case (talk) 17:01, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Usual. -- Pofka (talk) 21:46, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It looks like a newspaper picture. Apart from that: What about the personality rights of all the people in the picture, I wonder? --GeoTrinity (talk) 01:33, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Tremonist (talk) 13:19, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Ggia (talk) 09:42, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hammer of Doom X Würzburg Skepticism 7.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2015 at 19:32:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info Matti Tilaeus, singer of the finnish Funeral Doom Metal band Skepticism, live on stage in Würzburg, Germany at the Hammer of Doom-Festival 2015 - created, uploaded and nominated by Denis Barthel -- Denis Barthel (talk) 19:32, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Denis Barthel (talk) 19:32, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Sorry, but I think for this photo Hands are very important and unfortunately, they are blurred. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:10, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Medium. Daniel Case (talk) 17:45, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination - Medium69, Daniel Case: Thank you for your votes and opinions. From an esthetical viewpoint I can understand your comment, though I don't share it (I see his face as the major point). I don't want to be seen as arguing, but from a technical viewpoint I'd appreciate to know, if you checked if your expectations can be fulfilled at all? I doubt that, as imho the necessary DOF for both hands fully sharp would require an aperture of about f/16 or even more (please calculate it yourself). Beside the effects of diffraction it would require the person to sit like that for a very long time, as the concert situation is a dark one. Even more ISO wouldn't change that enough. So - is it really possible to shoot the picture as you want me to do it? Denis Barthel (talk) 07:31, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, under the conditions of a concert, it is not certain, but in this pose, I maintain that the hands are very important. It's a shame, because I found this very nice photo. Unfortunately, it is perhaps not feasible. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 09:13, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:20151030 Syrians and Iraq refugees arrive at Skala Sykamias Lesvos Greece 1.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2015 at 16:09:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info created and uploaded by Ggia, nominated by Yann (talk) 16:09, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support This one is even better than the last FPC. -- Yann (talk) 16:09, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:46, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose in the bottom is already similar FP --Mile (talk) 19:10, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --As I wrote bellow, oversaturated. Sting (talk) 20:01, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Info I uploaded a new version with less saturation. Ggia (talk) 20:26, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per Peter,and one is just enough for me LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:39, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Miles. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:46, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support good --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:07, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Yann (talk) 11:31, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Auditorio de Tenerife 2015.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2015 at 04:54:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info all by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald 04:54, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald 04:54, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support What a file! Wow. And the image "wow" too. --XRay ^talk 07:10, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:01, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:53, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per XRay. --Laitche (talk) 15:04, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Indeed - crazy file. -- Pofka (talk) 21:48, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 22:01, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I appreciate the effort put into this photo, but it lacks any wow and the lighting is too harsh.--Fotoriety (talk) 00:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Fotoriety: Did you see it in full resolution? The lighting is harsh because of the canarian sun, it's normal there. Regards, -- Wolf im Wald 00:55, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Perhaps a different time of day when the sun is lower, or a cloudy day when the sun is obscured, would have helped? Regards.--Fotoriety (talk) 22:01, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support. Agree with Fotoriety, but for me an image that would otherwise be a QI becomes FP when the resolution is exceptionally high. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:39, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support The "Wow" lies in the amount of detail visible here, imho. --El Grafo (talk) 11:06, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:21, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 20:45, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 05:42, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Entrada para cachoeira do buracão.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2015 at 21:50:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created and uploaded by Heris Luiz Cordeiro Rocha - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:50, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:50, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Awesome image in many regards. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:54, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
weak support Outstanding but quality not the best LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:34, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose unsharp + chromatic abberation. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 08:59, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sharp enough. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:51, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Alchemist and Medium. Great view but needs a field deeper than f/3.8 can provide. Daniel Case (talk) 17:34, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per others. --Tremonist (talk) 13:20, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 05:44, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tour Eiffel - 20150801 15h30 (10621).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2015 at 22:28:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers
Info created and uploaded by Medium69 - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:28, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual angle of the Eiffel Tower. -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:28, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning, albeit uncommon perspective. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:52, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:31, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support----Isasza (talk) 10:15, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:53, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Fresh view of a subject for which I didn't think any more could be possible. Daniel Case (talk) 17:37, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
WTF??? Unusual, uncommon, fresh view???? It's the fucking Eiffel Tower, posibly the structure with most pictures in history. Dozens of tourists take this photo every day. I take this kind of picture with most of the towers I encounter. BTW, not symmetric, I expect so for a FP, so Oppose. --Kadellar (talk) 17:52, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Kadellar: I fixed the very slight defect of symmetry. Thanks. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:08, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 22:01, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose not symmetric.--Jebulon (talk) 22:03, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Daniel. --Tremonist (talk) 13:20, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 05:43, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers

File:2015.08.07.-02-Anglersee Huettenfeld-Lampertheim--Grosse Koenigslibelle-Maennchen.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2015 at 11:40:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family_:_Aeshnidae_.28Hawker_dragonflies.29
Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 11:40, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hockei (talk) 11:40, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Marvellous. Never before I saw a combination of the two colors blue and green in a more decent way. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 12:38, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Johann. --Tremonist (talk) 12:49, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:52, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good --Rjcastillo (talk) 14:10, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:22, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:20, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Looks very over-sharpened, but it might be some other issue. Charles (talk) 17:56, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No over-sharpening. Maybe it seams for you because of the evening light that comes from the ventral side of the dragonfly. --Hockei (talk) 18:31, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Per Johann. Daniel Case (talk) 22:41, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:15, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:09, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 20:01, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:48, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family_:_Aeshnidae_.28Hawker_dragonflies.29

File:Caparica January 2013-5c.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2015 at 10:46:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
Info Stormy winter afternnon at the beach of Costa da Caparica, Portugal. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:46, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:46, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- --Isasza (talk) 14:53, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sky posterized. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:19, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Neither the composition nor the lighting impress me. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:38, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per King and Medium. I can see how this looked like a good idea, but its reach exceeds its grasp. Daniel Case (talk) 05:21, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I liked the pole … --El Grafo (talk) 12:50, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral due to the lighting, mostly. --Tremonist (talk) 13:23, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 05:32, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:46, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wall April 2015-4a.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2015 at 14:25:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info Minimalism again: detail of wall and window in the Belém Cultural Centre, Lisboa, Portugal. A second try of this similar nomination. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:25, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:25, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:21, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Wall seems unsharp and there is slight distortion evident on the window. Daniel Case (talk) 05:26, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Either it is sharp or it is not (it is); also, the slight curvature of some lines can only be detected by a fine analysis and would not be perceived looking at the picture as a whole. Sorry Daniel, but this kind of pixel peeping rationale misses completetly the point of this particular nomination. Better say "I don't like it" or "no wow for me". :-( -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:26, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I like it, but not enough to vote for it for FP. Better?

Daniel Case (talk) 16:56, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Minimalism is the essence of life.--Hubertl 15:59, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Hubertl. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:12, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Hubertl. --Tremonist (talk) 13:24, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 05:31, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:02, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - This is one time when looking at the wall is a rewarding pursuit. It's a good composition, and it's clear enough for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:54, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:22, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Freezed XRD.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2015 at 00:06:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info created and uploaded by Kaspar Kallip - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 00:06, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 00:06, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's a pity that the original EXIF is gone. How long was the pose for this? Yann (talk) 03:27, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Tilted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:10, 1 December 2015 (UTC) - Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:42, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~Yes, tilted. Pls fix it.~~ --Tremonist (talk) 13:36, 1 December 2015 (UTC) All right, fixed now.

Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:11, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral Will probably support if tilt corrected. Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:47, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support is it a time machine? ;-) --Alchemist-hp (talk) 10:24, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info I informed the author about this tilt issue. Kruusamägi (talk) 20:00, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info now corrected! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:29, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Medium69 + Tremonist + Daniel Case please take again a look ... thanks, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:09, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We all did by now, it seems. Thanks, Alchemist! --Tremonist (talk) 13:12, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support - -Yann sorry for the lost metadata- exposure was about 90 seconds for the XRD scan that lasted 80 seconds (adding a bit standstill for both ends) Kaspar Kallip 20:56, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Support OK. Could you add that info in the description? Regards, Yann (talk) 21:17, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:03, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks ok to me. dllu (t,c) 23:49, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Clear (or clear enough for me), interesting subject, well composed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:40, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:24, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:Mea a321-200 f-ormf arp.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2015 at 14:29:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport
Info Featured picture on Arabic Wikipedia.created by Arpingstone - uploaded by Arpingstone - nominated by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 -- ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 14:29, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 14:29, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose A tad oversharpened, tight crop. Daniel Case (talk) 02:46, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Daniel. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:05, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Daniel. --Tremonist (talk) 14:13, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:18, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sankt Georgen am Laengsee Burg Hochosterwitz 02122015 2403.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2015 at 13:16:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
Info created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Johann Jaritz -- Johann Jaritz 13:16, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 13:16, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Seems to be slightly tilted (leaning to the right), most easily visible at the church tower on the left. --Tremonist (talk) 13:34, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks, Tremonist, for your comment. I slightly turned it ccw and uploaded this version. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:40, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support clear autumn light and air.--Hubertl 14:44, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you, Johann, it's better now. --Tremonist (talk) 15:49, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:18, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:21, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hockei (talk) 20:12, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 20:28, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very imposing view. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:02, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 02:02, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:43, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:16, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 11:23, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 11:57, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:09, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 20:20, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Lmbuga (talk) 15:31, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:20, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications

File:Cedric Villani in his office 2015 n1.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2015 at 14:53:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info created by Jastrow - uploaded by Jastrow - nominated by Paris 16 -- Paris 16 (talk) 14:53, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 14:53, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment --C'est dommage, la MaP est sur la barbe, pas sur les yeux. Sting (talk) 23:07, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too distracting background. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:24, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Medium69, Per the title "Cedric Villani in his office", this is an environmental portrait where the background is as much a key element as the person. If anything, we aren't seeing enough of the office, and the blackboard is blank. -- Colin (talk) 08:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - I had not seen it that way; you are right. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:22, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Colin's comments, and this one's sharper. Daniel Case (talk) 17:02, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:21, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Preferred. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:11, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support ISO 1.600? Impressive! --Code (talk) 06:16, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support A very good portrait. I prefer this version. --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:08, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:25, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too tight at top. Vignetting--Lmbuga (talk) 15:34, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative edit

Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 14:53, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 15:12, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 21:43, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:22, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Spider… 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:42, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment For me this isn't a alternative but another shot! LivioAndronico ^(talk) 12:40, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not an alternative, but another shot. please nominate separately.--Jebulon (talk) 21:59, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Jebulon: : And if they were nominated separately and both had enough votes for promotion, you'd be OK with both becoming FP? --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:11, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- We have at least three FP of the Neuschwanstein Castle taken from the same point of view...--Jebulon (talk) 12:14, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Not taken in the same hour on the same day by the same photographer with the same camera. Please, Jebulon, take this to the FP talk page and get some consensus for your view, which seems to be in the minority. I would rather, however, that nominations were created with just one photo that the nominator believed at the time to be the finest. Let's get some rules defined, rather than arguing on every nomination about what "alternative" means. It absolutely is an alternative. The question is whether we think it is acceptable, and that should be settled by consensus rather than disrupting individual nominations. -- Colin (talk) 13:55, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- As I personaly take several pictures (at least 4 or more) and chose the best when I nominate(d) here, I think everybody could do the same. Otherwise, I will nominate here ad absurdum all the pictures-of-the-same-place-taken-by-me-at-the-same-time-with-the-same-camera as alternatives. I have a superb collection of boring landscapes to submit. Or series seen in QIC. Please be serious and help in making FPC a bit more strong.--Jebulon (talk) 16:31, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Well I agree with you, Jebulon, that we should not nominate multiple images when creating the nomination. So on that count, I think the nomination of two images here is wrong. The nominator should seriously consider which they think is best (and ask for opinions prior to nomination if not sure). But we should establish that rule by consensus on FP talk if we expect people to respect it. For after-nomination alternatives, that come as a result of review comments, I don't see how "I prefer your head/shoulders portrait" is any different to "I prefer if cropped to just head/shoulders". I mean, Diliff could create a dozen crops of his megapixel cathedrals and nominate them all at once for us to pick between if he wanted to, just as someone could bore us with a dozen slightly different frames taken of the same subject. So the potential for disruption is there no matter what one's definition is. Let's take this to FP talk. Nobody wants a weak FPC or to allow people to bend the rules in their favour. We could simply ban alternatives altogether. -- Colin (talk) 20:01, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Makes him look appear a bit too close to the viewer. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:11, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support --Tremonist (talk) 13:25, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

*{{o}} too tight at top. Vignetting--Lmbuga (talk) 15:34, 8 December 2015 (UTC)Mistake, sorry--Lmbuga (talk) 15:37, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ralf Roleček 10:09, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 12:13, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

The chosen alternative is: File:Cedric Villani in his office 2015 n1.jpg

File:HGM - Stiegenhaus 0347 8 9.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2015 at 21:44:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info all by Hubertl -- Hubertl 21:44, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info Stairwell from the first floor, Museum and Institute of military History, Vienna
Support -- Hubertl 21:44, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much detail is lost in the highlights. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:37, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice. Different from the other interiors we recently had. --Code (talk) 06:22, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:53, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:58, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:56, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, the detail in the highlights is lost, but (assuming we're talking about the areas in sunlight) that isn't enough of the image to bother me too much. Daniel Case (talk) 19:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:51, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:33, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:28, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 16:34, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 12:09, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Kuffner-Sternwarte-Heliometertrakt 1008.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2015 at 21:55:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info all by Hubertl --Hubertl 21:55, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info The historical Kuffner observatory, Vienna, heliometer dome.
Support -- Hubertl 21:55, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Because of lightweight star spun. Or too much, or not enough for my taste. Pity because for an observatory at night makes a great photo. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:25, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very little noise and WB seems quite accurate. I don't see the star trails as an issue. -- Thennicke (talk) 11:59, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 12:38, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too dim to work for me. Daniel Case (talk) 19:19, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment What do you mean, Daniel Case, should I lighten it up by Lightroom-turbo? This dome is not enlightened normally, because astronoms don´t like this "wrong" light so much, in fact, they hat it. In this case it was at the beginning, when the light started slowly. I captured exactly the scene, we had on this evening, 30s and 100 ISO. Therefore I nominated it. In fact, it is brighter than in real, and honestly, I used a torch light to enhance it a bit. --Hubertl 20:51, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You can photograph it however you want. I'm just saying that it doesn't work for me, not that you should fix it to please me (there are already more supports than my one oppose). If other people like it more than me, fine, and it might get to FP that way ... it's not my place to stand in the way. But it was a little hard, when looking at it, to figure out what it was supposed to a picture of, and if I have to say that, then I'm not wowed. Daniel Case (talk) 21:28, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, sounds fair.--Hubertl 00:15, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Case. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:08, 1 December 2015 (UTC
Support Interesting subject and atmosphere. Maybe a little bit small. Did you downsample it or where have all the pixels gone? --Code (talk) 06:12, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment it´s a crop, I made it with the 11-24mm f/4 L-lens. I didn´t know really what I have got, I realized it at home. --Hubertl 07:01, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Underexposed, rather small and it's not outstanding for me, sorry. --Ivar (talk) 06:21, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment No, it is not underexposed. It´s just dark. Because there was really no light but a small torch lamp. We, Ailura and me, we had a lot of fun, painting the tower and experimenting with this situation. By using my big calibrated monitors, it´s ok, probably not with a notebook-screen. But anyway, thanks for your review, Iifar --Hubertl 07:01, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Yes, a little underexposed, it seems. It at least seems so... --Tremonist (talk) 13:29, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Marvellous. Don`t you see that all lights are off? (It is an observatory, so it must be dark.) --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 16:59, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support a very good night shoot. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 10:26, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Underexposed. The actual brightness is irrelevant for correct exposure. — Julian H.^✈ 11:12, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question at all opposes: "why is this night shoot underexposed?" This is a nonsense argument for me. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 11:17, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Why am I supposed to treat a night shot differntly regarding exposure? It's a digital file, it doesn't contain information about the absolute display brightness. This means that it should use the full dynamic range that the colour profile allows. Here, the main subject is very dark. Please explain why this is nonsense. — Julian H.^✈ 11:35, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - I´m afraid, you don´t know, what you are talking about, Julian. It´s dark, therefore it is underexposed? This is just bullshit! Of course, I can do it different, blaming everyone by raising the colors. But I want to demonstrate, how people can see this tower in real. It´s fact, this world have different lightening conditions. I don´t want to simulate a kind of standard light. --Hubertl 21:10, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:53, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Ggia (talk) 21:12, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Case --Claus 04:20, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 12:08, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Butterfly Green-underside Blue - Glaucopsyche alexis 01.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2015 at 05:43:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
Info Glaucopsyche alexis (Green-underside blue butterfly). Created and uploaded by Zcebeci - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:43, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:43, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Delicate. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 07:21, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:07, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 12:03, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:08, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:11, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 15:50, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:00, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 17:56, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Johann. Daniel Case (talk) 18:50, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:56, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 22:33, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition a bit too soft focus (f/16) though. --Laitche (talk) 22:45, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 09:18, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 20:01, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:54, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hockei (talk) 18:01, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Lmbuga (talk) 15:30, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 12:58, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:13, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera

File:Mariaberget September 2015 01.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2015 at 11:30:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info Residential building built in 1888 at Mariaberget in Södermalm, Stockholm. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 11:30, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 11:30, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fint hus! A nice picture in these conditions in my opinion. --Ximonic (talk) 11:55, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Colors, Composition, the time - all perfect. --Ralf Roleček 13:40, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:07, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Ralf. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 14:08, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ralf. --Tremonist (talk) 14:10, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:16, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:54, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:00, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice color. There are some faults but I think they are due to the limitations of the long exposure and not really anything the photographer could do anything about. Daniel Case (talk) 03:46, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support :-) --XRay ^talk 06:49, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support good. --Mile (talk) 19:12, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:53, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hockei (talk) 17:55, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:07, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Poertschach Gloriette-Blick auf Woerther See und Blumeninsel 19112015 9211.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2015 at 10:54:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Johann Jaritz -- Johann Jaritz 10:54, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 10:54, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support die sparsamen Farben gefallen mir sehr gut. Viel besser als Postkartenwetter. --Ralf Roleček 13:37, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ralf. --Tremonist (talk) 14:10, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:16, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support yepp. --Hubertl 15:50, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:57, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice placid lake scene. Daniel Case (talk) 18:52, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:57, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 19:56, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 20:20, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice mood. --Laitche (talk) 22:43, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:45, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:52, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hockei (talk) 17:53, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - This is such a wonderful photo. It reminds me a bit of classic Chinese scroll paintings, with the mountains in the distance. Really superb composition and execution! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:32, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:09, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:0 A.D. Alpha 12 Loucetios.webm, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2015 at 03:13:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animated
Info created by Wildfire Games - uploaded and nominated by Sturm (talk) 03:13, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sturm (talk) 03:13, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rare that we get free content like this. Well made. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:06, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting and of good quality. --Tremonist (talk) 13:38, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I wasn't able to watch all of it but I did see most of it, and I was pleasantly astonished afterwards to find that this is indeed freely licensed content (are we sure about the music, though?). Daniel Case (talk) 17:54, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Daniel Case: At the end of the video it says Music from 0 A.D. CC-BY-SA, so I guess that means that it's freely-licensed in-game music. --El Grafo (talk) 15:46, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - The music is composed and produced by Omri Lahav, specifically for the 0 A.D. project under CC-BY-SA. So yes, it's free. The music can also be downloaded directly from our source too: http://trac.wildfiregames.com/browser/ps/trunk/binaries/data/mods/public/audio/music --Sanderd17 (talk) 14:06, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I would not be a good judge for a video. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 18:12, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support State of the art open source real-time strategy game. Even though this is from an older release, the demonstrated graphics features are still representative of the game. Iconv (talk) 05:34, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support: I'm part of the development team (so if that's against the rules, don't count my vote) and I would actually prefer our most recent video to be featured (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgAKtpQGpLg), but any publicity is good for our project (which is completely open btw, not just this video). --Sanderd17 (talk) 14:06, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Nice video, but I am a bit uncomfortable to support this for FP with all the promotion part. I would rather support one with only 3D scenery shooting. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:42, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - I understand your point, Yann, but it's about a non-profit group that deals directly with open license music, art and technology. And after all, we all here, in a way or other, support promotional stuff related to related organizations. :) Personally, I would mind about promoting pictures of celebrities, just like dozens of examples in the past. Sturm (talk) 21:01, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:13, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice a Age of Empires free (GPL), we could support any free project IMHO because it share the same spirit collaborative --The Photographer (talk) 10:34, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 06:09, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animated

File:Agusta A109K2 - let so záchranárom.JPG, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2015 at 21:01:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport
Info created by Tatransky - uploaded by Tatransky, cropped by Pine - nominated by Pine -- Pine^✉ 21:01, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pine^✉ 21:01, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support this picture has a wow! --Ralf Roleček 21:13, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great action scene. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:42, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent ! --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:11, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Marvellous. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 06:30, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Really good! (Sorry, it's a very small resolution.) --XRay ^talk 06:47, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support But please add a description in at least a second language. A geocode would be appreciated, too. --Code (talk) 07:23, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a brief description in English. --Pine^✉ 18:18, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

weak support a 1/200s or 1/180s will be a better exposure time. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 10:21, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:43, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I second the request for a geocode. Daniel Case (talk) 22:48, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info I think a geocode is necessary, because "somewhere in Switzerland" ... --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:54, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adrenaline rush! --★ Poké⁹⁵ 11:17, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 18:19, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - That's really impressive! The photographer took a very time-sensitive shot and managed to make a good composition out of it, too! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:18, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Lmbuga (talk) 15:25, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:34, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:08, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Air transport

File:Ceiling of Santa Croce in Gerusalemme (Roma).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2015 at 14:11:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Info All by LivioAndronico ^(talk) 14:11, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LivioAndronico ^(talk) 14:11, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:16, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 15:32, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:03, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:59, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 20:46, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not totally perfect, but again I feel those failings are an inevitable tradeoff of the long exposure. Daniel Case (talk) 03:49, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:39, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 19:09, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:37, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:06, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

File:Glen Coe Rainbow.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2015 at 21:21:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info The sun and rain do battle at Glen Coe, where Scottish clans once fought and died. All by me. -- Colin (talk) 21:21, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 21:21, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support One word: mood. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:41, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support super! --Pudelek (talk) 21:57, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral not sharp in low distance, why 1/200? --Ralf Roleček 22:19, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:41, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice rainbow. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 06:31, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice. IMO the Unsharpness in the front could be reduced. --XRay ^talk 06:48, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 07:20, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 09:16, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 10:22, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:57, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 15:18, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support W-O-W --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:44, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:45, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Such fine detail in an already stunning image ... Daniel Case (talk) 04:29, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 09:41, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Maire (talk) 11:50, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:48, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I believe you haven't added the rainbow with Photoshop :) --Laitche (talk) 13:21, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 18:20, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:16, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Lmbuga (talk) 15:25, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great mood! --Tremonist (talk) 15:33, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Iglesia de San Pedro de los Francos, Calatayud, España, 2014-12-29, DD 046-050 HDR.JPG, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2015 at 18:51:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info Altar of the gotic church of San Pedro de los Francos, located in Calatayud, Aragon, Spain. The original temple was founded in the 12th century by order of Alfonso I, "The Battler" to offer the french people who helped him in the Battle of Cutanda (1120) against the Almoravids and stayed definitely in Calatayud a place to pray, but the current church was built 2 centuries later. All by me, Poc o² 18:51, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 18:51, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support More "light pictures". 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:13, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:09, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Arion. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 06:27, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:42, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support One of the best church interiors here in a while . Too bad, though, that the chairs on the left were not as orderly as the ones on the right. Daniel Case (talk) 17:43, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:58, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 18:18, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:15, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Great work! The lack of symmetry of the chairs arguably makes the composition more interesting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:51, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Lmbuga (talk) 15:26, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:35, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:07, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

File:Laon Cathedral Interior 04.JPG, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2015 at 13:58:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#France
Info Interior of Laon Cathedral Notre-Dame, Picardy, France. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:58, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Uoaei1 (talk) 13:58, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Exhilarating. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 16:22, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 16:24, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 18:04, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Straordinaria composizione LivioAndronico ^(talk) 20:18, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Extraordinária composição. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:18, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Some clipping on the buttresses, but that's too small a portion of the image to offset everything else that was done right. Daniel Case (talk) 02:55, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:39, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:12, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:05, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support great, impressive view.--ArildV (talk) 21:42, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done ! --Gzzz (talk) 22:29, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:04, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#France

File:Misvormde nevelzwam (Clitocybe nebularis) in verval. Locatie De Famberhorst 01.JPG, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2015 at 05:59:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Clitocybe nebularis (Tricholomataceae)
Info Deformed Clitocybe nebularis into disrepair. The location Famberhorst. A mushroom that grows on another mushroom. Rare malformation (Teratology).created by Famberhorst - uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Famberhorst -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:59, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:59, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 12:38, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good catch, but no wow for me. Daniel Case (talk) 21:29, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info over the photo: usually get up Featured picture candidates pictures of beautiful landscapes or beautiful church interiors. Not so with this picture. This is a photograph of a mushroom with a rare disorder. Furthermore, the photograph taken so that a mushroom expert on the basis of the plates under the hat of the mushroom may easily determine. Such interesting pictures of mushrooms with a deviation you come to Commons: Featured_picture in my opinion (too?) not against.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:44, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:33, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support High EV. --Tremonist (talk) 13:33, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 06:28, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 14:45, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:47, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 20:05, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- nice capture of a rarity Atsme😊📞 17:56, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 06:10, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Fungi

File:Clanculus puniceus 01.JPG, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2015 at 07:02:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Bones, shells and fossils
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 07:02, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 07:02, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 07:19, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support as always. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 09:57, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Photographer (talk) 10:24, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 12:15, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:44, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 19:59, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support We need a automatic support for Llez's images LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:42, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 21:49, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:45, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:31, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question I added some notes. Can someone confirm, that this image has not an issue with posterization? --Ivar (talk) 08:52, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- ~~Oppose~~ I checked first version and that's definitely better, second version is overprocessed for me, sorry. --Ivar (talk) 09:01, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment I reverted to the first version. (The "issues" you mentioned above are still visible. I checked the original stacked version (before further processing) and it it's the same. So it is possibly a problem of stacking (intensive reds and browns sometimes can cause problems in stacking) --Llez (talk) 11:07, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - Support Good to go now! --Ivar (talk) 13:25, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 18:21, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:32, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:12, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:27, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Bones, shells and fossils

File:Plitvice Lakes National Park BW 2014-10-13 12-34-20.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2015 at 09:37:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created - uploaded - nominated by -- Berthold Werner (talk) 09:37, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 09:37, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:14, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support sehr schön gestaltet. Auch der Ast odr Baum rechts stört nicht, im Gegenteil. --Ralf Roleček 13:33, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ralf. --Tremonist (talk) 13:40, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Contemplative. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 16:25, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm not wowed by this, and the WB seems a little too cool as well. Daniel Case (talk) 18:49, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry,per Daniel LivioAndronico ^(talk) 20:20, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry, no wow for me: unbalanced composition (+ false WB). --Alchemist-hp (talk) 00:01, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

wb is intentionally as it is. --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:44, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Sorry, composition is not ideal. --Laitche (talk) 07:31, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose What are we looking at ? At a not well centered dead tree or at a lake partly hidden by a dead tree ? sorry... Gzzz (talk) 22:26, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:41, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Black-bellied whistling ducks (Dendrocygna autumnalis).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2015 at 16:49:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Info all by Charlesjsharp -- Charles (talk) 16:49, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charles (talk) 16:49, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support It may not be a QI but I can support this, nice! --Laitche (talk) 17:43, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much noise and all the ducks are not perfectly sharp. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 18:11, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice moment LivioAndronico ^(talk) 20:18, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 20:39, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Livio. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:14, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Medium. Striking image all the same (And why is it coming out slightly stretched on the image page?) Daniel Case (talk) 03:47, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia error of some sort. No idea how to rectify it. Charles (talk) 15:12, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see the connection with Wikipedia... --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:51, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Amazing anyway. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 06:19, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. --Tremonist (talk) 14:38, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 20:05, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 02:47, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:12, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 20:03, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gzzz (talk) 22:30, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:21, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Meenikunnu Suur Suujärv 2015.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2015 at 20:12:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
Info created and uploaded by Vaido Otsar - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 20:12, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 20:12, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Super great panorama mood. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:24, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Arion. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 06:10, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 10:49, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:03, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 12:44, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:43, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 12:51, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:11, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 18:34, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:26, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:25, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas

File:Renaissance Center, Detroit, Michigan from S 2014-12-07.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2015 at 13:20:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers
Info This image is a FP on English Wikipedia. High technical quality and resolution. Created and uploaded by Crisco 1492 - nominated by SSTflyer -- SSTflyer (talk) 13:20, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- SSTflyer (talk) 13:20, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Futuristic. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 16:23, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 16:26, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 18:04, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 20:21, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:22, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for the nomination. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:05, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Seems overprocessed to me (see, especially, bottom center). Daniel Case (talk) 02:52, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel, you are right, the water and some other areas seem to be overprocessed, maybe too much noise removed. But the picture is too good to oppose. -- -donald- (talk) 07:06, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:40, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gzzz (talk) 22:28, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:19, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers

File:Rose Center for Earth and Space by Frederick Phineas and Sandra Priest, New York, 04003a.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2015 at 20:59:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info created by Carol M. Highsmith, uploaded and nominated by Yann (talk) 20:59, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quite sharp, we can see a lot of details, and good exposure and colors. -- Yann (talk) 20:59, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:08, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Brilliant colors! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:15, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:05, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow!. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 06:14, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support fine work! --Hubertl 10:29, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. --Tremonist (talk) 14:35, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely shades of blue. Daniel Case (talk) 02:09, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:46, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice but distorted ... --Laitche (talk) 12:10, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Request --Please fix color space: I have very weird colors reproduction in FF (ok in IE). Sting (talk) 14:26, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Jeffrey's Exif Viewer says that it has Embedded color profile: “sRGB”. Yann (talk) 10:42, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - That's the basic color profile info. If you go down to the "ICC_Profile" section, you'll see the profile is a "sRGB v4 ICC" one while the common (standard) one is "sRGB IEC61966-2.1". In FF v42 with the ICC v4 color management enabled, I get an image with flashy light cyan, pink and green (!!). For those who see that image with natural colors, it's because they use a navigator that doesn't cope with the ICC standard v4 (IE) or has its management disabled (FF default). For more information, please check the official ICC page. Sting (talk) 16:25, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Oppose --Sting (talk) 13:51, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 20:30, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Colors !! -- Pofka (talk) 14:10, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support but per Sting. Relatively tight on top. — Julian H.^✈ 11:17, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Per Laitche. There's something wrong with perspective and/or distortion. --Code (talk) 22:30, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:24, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Sparrige-Schüppling (Pholiota squarrosa).JPG, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2015 at 19:56:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi
Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- H. Krisp (talk) 19:56, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 19:56, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very,very,very good LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:37, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:07, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:48, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Livio. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 06:12, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:38, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 12:44, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:31, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hockei (talk) 17:58, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 18:34, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Nice object, nice colors, excellent quality -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:17, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Excellent composition, very enjoyable to look at. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:13, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:27, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 10:46, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:17, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Fungi

File:Atauriques.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2015 at 23:45:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fine architectural detail at the Alhambra Palace in Southern Spain

Category: Arabesque details in Alhambra
Info created by Yves Remedios - uploaded by User:Serg!o - nominated by *«Md.Boualam»

Support -- محمد بوعلام عصامي *«Md.Boualam» (talk) 23:45, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: below 2 MPix and obvious lack of sharpness. --Hubertl 15:28, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:56, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Interurban Railway Museum October 2015 06.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2015 at 02:20:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info created by Michael Barera - originally uploaded by Michael Barera, corrections made by Jacek Halicki - nominated by Michael Barera -- Michael Barera (talk) 02:20, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain -- Michael Barera (talk) 02:20, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Don't like all these shadows. Especially on the train. Center is way too dark. -- Pofka (talk) 13:16, 9 December 2015 (UTC)([reply]
Oppose Sorry but the prominent shadows is right in the middle of the images, in the most important part of the images (part of train and building). --ArildV (talk) 21:12, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:03, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your feedback, everyone! Michael Barera (talk) 00:37, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:48, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Patent-Motorwagen Nr.1 Benz 2.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2015 at 22:53:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: [[Commons:Featured pictures/<add the category here>]]
Info created by DaimlerChrysler AG - uploaded by Raymond - nominated by محمد بوعلام عصامي *«Md.Boualam»

Support Nomination and support--محمد بوعلام عصامي *«Md.Boualam» (talk) 22:53, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: below 2 MPix and visible artefacts. ---donald- (talk) 07:55, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:14, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zalophus californianus (Otarie de Californie) - 418.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2015 at 13:44:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Medium69 -- Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:44, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:44, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Balanced crop suggested. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:49, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Way too small for an easy-to-take zoo photo at FP. Hard to see any detail in the animal's face. -- Colin (talk) 20:10, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral It's a nice jump, but I have to agree with Colin. --Tremonist (talk) 13:19, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Nice jump and beautiful colors, but Colin has a point. Daniel Case (talk) 19:39, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:50, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:46, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Superb Starling at jurong bird park singapore.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2015 at 21:01:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Info created by Ecntrk - uploaded by Ecntrk - nominated by Firebrace -- Firebrace (talk) 21:01, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Firebrace (talk) 21:01, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry, this image is verry noisy. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nicely captured, but per Alchemist. --Cayambe (talk) 09:46, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Alchemist --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 09:56, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Under "Image page requirements": "No advertisements, signatures, or other watermarks in image." There is a signature in this image, so correct me if I'm wrong, but it would seem that this image is therefore ineligible for featuring. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:59, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Very noisy and because of the watermark. --Laitche (talk) 13:27, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:45, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Buste Gustave Eiffel - 20150801 14h57 (10618).jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2015 at 13:20:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Medium69 -- Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:20, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:20, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Need a crop at top.--Claus 17:16, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: A 2.8MP photo of a bust? This is what QI is for. Please when you nominate consider if the image has "wow" or is merely fine. -- Colin (talk) 20:37, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

I withdraw my nomination --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:31, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:44, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Los Azulejos Tenerife.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2015 at 17:41:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info Los Azulejos rocks in Teide National Park, Tenerife. All by Роман Дергунов -- Роман Дергунов (talk) 17:41, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Роман Дергунов (talk) 17:41, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sharp enough. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:47, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Tight top crop. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:20, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Medium, also WB seems a little off as well. Daniel Case (talk) 03:15, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Medium. --Tremonist (talk) 15:29, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Роман Дергунов (talk) 22:11, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:43, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barrow Offshore wind turbines NR.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2015 at 19:27:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#United Kingdom
Info created by Andy Dingley, edited by Muhammad Mahdi Karim - uploaded by Muhammad Mahdi Karim - nominated by Pine -- Pine^✉ 19:27, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pine^✉ 19:27, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice. A pity that it isn't larger. --Code (talk) 22:17, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Simple composition but well done. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:56, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:48, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very special. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 06:16, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice mood, minimalist. Daniel Case (talk) 03:17, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:54, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I'm not sure if this needs any more votes of support, but it gets mine, on the basis first of all of good composition and then of clarity in capturing both the wind turbines and the mist. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:06, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:29, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support The sharpness and resolution leaves something to be desired, but the composition is amazing. dllu (t,c) 03:45, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:10, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places#United Kingdom

File:Fanous Ramadan.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2015 at 23:34:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info created by Ibrahim.ID - uploaded by Ibrahim.ID - nominated by User:محمد بوعلام عصامي
Support nomination and support -- محمد بوعلام عصامي *«Md.Boualam» (talk) 23:34, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Respectfully, I am going to oppose this for Featured status. The lamp is very pretty, but the rest of the picture doesn't do much for me (nothing really helps my eye move around the picture frame), and in this case, I also think that the clear asymmetry probably hurts the picture. If you know the photographer, perhaps he'd like to try taking some symmetrical photos of the lantern and seeing how they come out, if he hasn't already done so. All the best. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:50, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice colours vs. quality problems, that's the question here it seems... --Tremonist (talk) 13:15, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think it is a nice concept and am happy for the asymmetric position (centred can be boring -> rule-of-thirds). But the white cloth that seems to be curving up to form a background doesn't look great. I'd prefer to see a cultural object like this used in an environmental shot, rather than a bare studio. -- Colin (talk) 13:29, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Is FPC bot playing up again? -- Colin (talk) 13:29, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Moral Support, at least. And so the bot won't close it. ;o) Yann (talk) 19:18, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support On a strictly compositional and technical basis, I like it. Daniel Case (talk) 02:52, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
weak Support per Daniel --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:56, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support High educational value, very well executed. Nice shot. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:04, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light effect. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:10, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Nice idea but poor quality. --Laitche (talk) 11:52, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 08:46, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Morros.png, not featured edit

Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: [[Commons:Featured pictures/<nostalgia>]]
Info created by Richard Melo da Silva - uploaded by Richard Melo da Silva - nominated by محمد بوعلام عصامي *«Md.Boualam»
Support Nomination and support-- محمد بوعلام عصامي *«Md.Boualam» (talk) 23:25, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I object to this image being removed from consideration without explanation. I am not voting to make this a Featured Picture, but an explanation is needed. Are drawings per se ineligible? Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:38, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Ikan Kekek: As far as I can see, it was just automatically closed for voting after the appropriate amount of time: No support votes (apert from the nominator) after 5 days = speedy decline. Drawings are not ineligible per se, but there are rules for what kinds of drawing can be a FP at the FP guidelines (section "Artworks, illustrations, and historical documents"). Hope that helps, --El Grafo (talk) 12:51, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks for the explanation. I wasn't aware that there were separate rules about an image that hadn't been seconded. Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:47, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 08:38, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sant'Antonio in Campo Marzio - Interior HDR.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2015 at 21:33:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Info All by LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:33, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:33, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:03, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Formidable. Rome seems to have an endless amount of stunning churches. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 06:08, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:39, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 08:55, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:03, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Some odd colors are probably inevitable with a long exposure. Daniel Case (talk) 17:15, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 18:34, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:18, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Beautiful photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:03, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Lmbuga (talk) 15:21, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:26, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:17, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:37, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:09, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

Info Demoted/Delisted to not featured per this consensus. --Cart (talk) 14:16, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Male Russian Blue cat at the 2011 Moscow Cat Show (5624853840).jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2015 at 04:42:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora
Info created by Nickolas Titkov - uploaded by INeverCry - nominated by INeverCry -- INeverCry 04:42, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- INeverCry 04:42, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I wish (ignorantly, perhaps, as I don't know the technique involved) that the ears could be more in focus, but this is a really good photo of the rest of the cat's face, and the photographer got the cat to look at the camera, which often doesn't happen. I mean, how can you vote against a photo in which part of it shows every hair, and the cat is looking right at the viewer? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:34, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cats are not so rare. I don't see a FP here. Yann (talk) 08:40, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: Have a look at Category:Featured pictures of cats. There's only 7 FPs. Category:Featured pictures of horses has 27 FPs by comparison (35 if you count the subcat of equestrian sports FPs). INeverCry 09:16, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I know that we have few FPs of cats, and it's a pity. They are nice subjects... and I love cats. ;) In addition to the cut ears, the expression is not nice. Yann (talk) 09:27, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination. INeverCry 10:01, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 12:10, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Virgulino Ferreira da Silva (Lampião).jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2015 at 06:25:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1930-1940
Info created by Creator:Benjamin Abrahão Botto - uploaded and nominated by Sturm (talk) 06:25, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info "Captain" Virgulino Ferreira da Silva, better known as Lampião, was the most famous bandit leader of the Cangaço and this picture is one of the iconic works of Creator:Benjamin Abrahão Botto. Cangaço was a form of banditry endemic to the Brazilian Northeast in the 1920s and 1930s.
Support -- Sturm (talk) 06:25, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The photo is old and in need of a little restoration. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:05, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would try if I had the minimum skills for that. :( But thanks for the vote and comment :) Anyway, it's still a emblematic portrait! Sturm (talk) 22:32, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose i think also, it need a restauratin. --Ralf Roleček 23:08, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Medium. --Tremonist (talk) 14:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Sturm (talk) 15:31, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 12:09, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rhacophorus lateralis - Winged gliding Frog - male.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2015 at 17:27:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Amphibians
Info created by Vipin Baliga - uploaded by Palosirkka - nominated by Moon rabbit 365 -- Moon rabbit 365 (talk) 17:27, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Moon rabbit 365 (talk) 17:27, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, the image taken behind glass makes it very unpleasant. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 19:46, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How did you see that it was taken behind glass? I didn't see it! --Moon rabbit 365 (talk) 19:58, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Moon rabbit 365: Watch your full size image ... It is horrible because of this glass. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:38, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tu as raison! La prochaine fois je regarderai l'image en full size avant de la proposer. --Moon rabbit 365 (talk) 09:28, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Moon rabbit 365: Je vois que tu est francophone : j'en suis franchement désolé, car sans cela elle était magnifique. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:51, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Looks ok in thumbnail but larger size the quality is very poor and does indeed seem to be behind dirty glass. -- Colin (talk) 20:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 12:08, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:20110102 Zoroastrian Towers of Silence Yazd Iran.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2015 at 08:41:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info Tower of Silence (zoroastrian open air graveyard in Iran) / created by Ggia - uploaded by Ggia - nominated by Ggia -- Ggia (talk) 08:41, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ggia (talk) 08:41, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 12:47, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:21, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very special motive. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 05:01, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:59, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 18:36, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love the raking light ... excellent example of why things look better in it. Daniel Case (talk) 20:01, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 20:27, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:23, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 12:54, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:29, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Bogesunds slott February 2013 04.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2015 at 08:43:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info Bogesund Castle outside Vaxholm in Stockholm County, Sweden. Built by Per Brahe the Younger in the 1640s. The castle was renovate in the 1860s and rebuilt to make it look like a medieval Norman castle. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 08:43, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 08:43, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:07, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:12, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mellow soft northern light. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:58, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:46, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 18:36, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support That's a heck of a big tripod you've got, Arild. -- Colin (talk) 20:39, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support One of the best aerial photographs here in a while. Daniel Case (talk) 03:05, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 04:46, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:22, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Lmbuga (talk) 15:23, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:10, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 10:18, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:30, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Dock Bridge Harrison Newark June 2015 panorama.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2015 at 06:11:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges
Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:11, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:11, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Super panorama. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 06:13, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry too dark and lack of details in the right dark areas. --Hubertl 10:27, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Johann. --Tremonist (talk) 14:33, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:59, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 01:00, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice to see a picture from my native state here. Nicer still to be able to support it. Daniel Case (talk) 03:30, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 05:30, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent --Rjcastillo (talk) 14:11, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:08, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:35, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges

File:Faurot Field sunset skyline.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2015 at 17:40:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info Created by Mark Schierbecker - uploaded by Mark Schierbecker - nominated by Mark Schierbecker -- Mark Schierbecker (talk) 17:40, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mark Schierbecker (talk) 17:40, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Tilted and blurred. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 09:55, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose +1 --Ralf Roleček 11:37, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor quality. Not even reaching QP. -- Pofka (talk) 18:37, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree about the quality, but also for FP you need a better composition. The composition and crop is random and busy. The trees in the foreground is disturbing.--ArildV (talk) 20:45, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. I understand what the photographer saw when he gazed upon the scene, but as I've also learned getting a beautiful picture of a beautiful sunset is not a guarantee that you will have an FP-level image (Not without a GND filter, at least). Daniel Case (talk) 03:13, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Tremonist (talk) 15:21, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 22:22, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Feu d'artifice - 287.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2015 at 11:33:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Medium69 -- Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:33, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:33, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose There dirty marks in the centre of the image. Perhaps something landed on your lens. For a firework on black background (rather than in a picturesque setting like a castle) I'd prefer to just see one kind of firework. The red fireworks on the bottom spoil the image and are cropped arbitrarily. Looking at the category, I see you've taken lots of QI images and they are nice to look at as a collection. But not really outstanding. For such a simple and common motif I'd want something excellent, than this just QI. The best way of adding wow to a firework is to take the image at a location that is scenic at night. I know I FPX'd your last image, so I'll not do that twice in a row (someone else might). Please have a look at the top-level category your nominations are in and consider whether this really is among the very select finest we have here, or just good. There's nothing wrong with achieving QI. -- Colin (talk) 12:35, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Colin: I don't think those are dirty marks, possibly smokes from fireworks explosion. -- KTC (talk) 01:40, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:00, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral At least partly per Colin. --Tremonist (talk) 14:37, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Having attempted a little fireworks photography myself, I appreciate the difficulties in timing and environmental factors not in the photographer's control. However, Colin is right that for a FP either the fireworks should be set against a picturesque background, or it needs to be technically perfect in terms of framing, timing, and isolation. (e.g. 1, 2, 3) Ideally for me, the exposure would had been started earlier so that the paths trace back to the same point, and the red fireworks at the bottom doesn't work for me either. -- KTC (talk) 01:40, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Having also attempted a little fireworks photography, I agree with what KTC says. dllu (t,c) 02:54, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:31, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:15, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:15-11-25-Maribor Inenstadt-RalfR-WMA 4226.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2015 at 19:07:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info Maribor, Slovenia, center of town, alley to river Drau - all by Ralf Roleček
Support -- Ralf Roleček 19:07, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:12, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Very lovely mood - but why f/4.8? The closest parts are rather unsharp. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:04, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely mood. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 07:20, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I find it a little bit too dark. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:06, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 11:57, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Johann. --Tremonist (talk) 14:12, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the mood. I wish it were sharper in places, but that does not ruin the image. It would work as a National Geographic cover or a travel poster. Daniel Case (talk) 18:02, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 20:57, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Compositionally great. Although it has some quality issues. --Code (talk) 22:27, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral for the quality issues. Apart from that, a good composition, therefore no Contra. --Hubertl 11:01, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Lmbuga (talk) 15:31, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 08:20, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:2010-10-10-oderpruch-pl-by-RalfR-23.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2015 at 23:28:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info Oderbruch in Poland - all by Ralf Roleček
Support -- Ralf Roleček 23:28, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:41, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Pleasing composition, clear photo and already a Quality image. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:19, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:17, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 13:11, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:15, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Very nice scenery, but a bit too soft for me. There are also some CAs visible at the leaves in the upper right corner. --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:26, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support because of the chromatic aberrations. --Ximonic (talk) 18:12, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~:*What's with the permissions issue on this image? It says the license isn't compatible. --Atsme😊📞 18:35, 8 December 2015 (UTC)~~ ^{I got a bit confused reading the different licenses.}19:48, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And again: the image has the "compatible" FAL license and additional the two other ... --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:30, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~temporary Oppose: the chromatic abberation need to be removed. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:30, 8 December 2015 (UTC)~~ --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:51, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- CA reduced. --Ralf Roleček 19:44, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Danke :-) --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:51, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Beacuse a bit soft LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:13, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:27, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think that the river is tilted - to the left --Pudelek (talk) 22:52, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 22:56, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Love the composition and colors but I wish that shift from the lighter to darker sky at the top weren't so jarring. Daniel Case (talk) 00:58, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 06:26, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:41, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Ralf, ich respektiere deine Gesamtleistung als Beiträger für Commons. Dieses Bild finde ich persönlich allerdings nicht gelungen. Ich verstehe nicht, warum Du die Äste auf der rechten Seite zum Bild hinzugefügt hast. Ich finde sie störend. Ebenso wie die Grashalme im Vordergrund, die für mich die ruhige Atmosphäre des Bildes stören (Ralf, I really respect your overall contribution to Commons. However, this image doesn't work for me. I don't understand why you chose to include the branches on the right hand side. Personally, I find them distracting. Also, the grass in the foreground adds a busy touch to the picture.) Mit den besten Grüßen aus der Ferne, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:17, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Die angesprochenen Elemente sind Absicht. Sie rahmen das Bild ein. Wären die Äste rechts nicht, würde das Bild nach rechts "flüchten". Sicher, das ist eine sehr konservative Anschauung aber so habe ich es mal gelernt. Früher habe ich auch mit absichtlicher Vignettierung gerahmt, das würde heute und hier hoffnungslos durchfallen. Alles Geschmackssachen. Bei derartigen Fotos "zoome" ich mit den Füßen und versuche, den in meinen Augen besten Ausschnitt so zu finden. Daß die Äste kurz über dem Wasser enden, ist kein Zufall. Aber ich danke dir für den Kommentar. Meine Motivsicht ist offenbar nicht allgemein gültig, ich werde das mal überdenken und vielleicht in Zukunft anders rangehen. Niemand ist vollkommen und gerade das merke ich hier immer wieder. --Ralf Roleček 22:27, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Ralf, ich schaue seit Jahren immer mal wieder die "Blind Photo Critiques" aus der Serie The Grid von Scott Kelby. Die Folgen sind nicht nur amüsant, ich habe auch eine Menge dabei gelernt. Beste Grüße --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:13, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wladyslaw (talk) 15:30, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:59, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 08:25, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Afternoon at Tennfjorden, Raftsundet, Hinnøya, Norway, 2015 September.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2015 at 10:36:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info created by Ximonic (Simo Räsänen) - uploaded by Ximonic (Simo Räsänen) - nominated by Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:36, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - This is my first nomination at Commons, but I've looked at lots of photos here, including a large quantity of Featured pictures, and this is one of the most beautiful I've seen. It's already a Quality image, and I think it has that “wow factor” we're looking for. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:36, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 11:47, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support as always. #MoreXimonic 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:58, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:09, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 18:38, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support This has great wow indeed! --Uoaei1 (talk) 20:00, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ArildV (talk) 20:48, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:35, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you! --Ximonic (talk) 04:37, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:24, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:20, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not perfect (highlight suppression seems to have resulted in an unnatural blue in that patch of sky at left; and maybe I'd have cropped some of the top down to make the highlights there less potentially distracting). But it does enough good things right. Daniel Case (talk) 18:12, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 18:34, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - beee-utiful....--Atsme😊📞 19:37, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:44, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 11:37, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 13:39, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 08:23, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Birchwood Slavnoe 2012 G1.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2015 at 20:19:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:19, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:19, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:26, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 07:22, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:07, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 11:56, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 13:38, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 14:08, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:11, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Slight surrealism gives this scene its beauty. Daniel Case (talk) 18:07, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks to all for reviews and support. Possibly, it will be my 50th FP. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:18, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that means it's time to open the Champagne. :) --Ximonic (talk) 19:39, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support :-) --XRay ^talk 06:50, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral nice, but too simple --Pudelek (talk) 12:38, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too simple, no wow.--Claus 04:23, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:42, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice but a bit weak composition. --Laitche (talk) 10:57, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow factor... --Gzzz (talk) 12:04, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 2 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 08:20, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Bruggetje in fietspad naar Langweerderwielen (Langwarder Wielen) 02.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2015 at 18:20:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info In bridge bike path to Langweerderwielen (Langwarder Wielen) North Oudeweg under the viaduct of the A7 highway. created by Famberhorst - uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Famberhorst -- Famberhorst (talk) 18:20, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 18:20, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support More "mood pictures". 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:32, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support You make so beautiful unspectacular photos. --Ralf Roleček 18:49, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Ralf Roletschek for the compliment!--Famberhorst (talk) 19:02, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 19:48, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I feel dampness and fog on my face. Very impressive! -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:27, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - What they all said. Amazing photo, fantastic composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:35, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support ...and 7 LivioAndronico ^(talk) 22:58, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per George. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:31, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 13:10, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:16, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 18:31, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Subdued, earthy colors ... cloudy, diffuse light ... cropped treetops ... two very mundane everyday pieces of infrastructure as subjects. It shouldn't work, but it does—perhaps it's the combination of unlikely elements that somehow makes it extraordinary. And the convergence of the bridge lines. And the contrast between the concrete-and-steel complicated viaduct and the wooden, simple bike bridge. Daniel Case (talk) 21:11, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Hubertl 22:58, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 07:08, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 08:24, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Germany and Argentina face off in the final of the World Cup 2014 -2014-07-13 (5).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2015 at 00:54:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Info created by Danilo Borges/copa2014.gov.br - uploaded by JukoFF - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:54, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:54, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:54, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:41, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:04, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 09:57, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Clear, and an exciting photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:23, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:26, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 18:38, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 20:26, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 04:07, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Tremonist (talk) 13:25, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 11:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 08:21, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

File:Heinz Memorial Chapel, interior.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2015 at 02:18:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info created by user:dllu - uploaded by dllu - nominated by Dllu -- dllu (t,c) 02:18, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- dllu (t,c) 02:18, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:52, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 08:21, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:14, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 18:38, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support real good LivioAndronico ^(talk) 23:01, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm a little concerned about the colors. Are there blue lights or is it some kind of shadow? It looks very much like the church has been lit by some artificial blue lights. --Ximonic (talk) 04:41, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The bluish color comes from the outside light passing through the mostly blue stained glass windows. Also, I set the white balance so that the stuff in the middle wouldn't be too orange. dllu (t,c) 12:23, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Alright. I thought, if it was from normal windows then the blue tone would have been a little weird for typical sky color. But through tinted glass, I understand. --Ximonic (talk) 15:26, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support These light effects are actually of a nature intended by those who constructed the chapel and its windows. Really beautiful. --Tremonist (talk) 13:22, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I'm impressed, too. This will look good on the front page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:37, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good and nice colors--Lmbuga (talk) 15:19, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Very regretful oppose I can see a lot of effort went into this and much of it paid off. But not all of it. There's ringing around the lights, and posterization of the relief at the top. Support OK, fixed. Daniel Case (talk) 16:43, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed The relief at the top, the lights, and the stained glass window should now be correct. dllu (t,c) 18:41, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Laitche (talk) 11:32, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 07:09, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 08:22, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

File:Mount Ararat and the Yerevan skyline.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2015 at 11:45:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
Info created and uploaded by Սէրուժ - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:45, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:45, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~~one of~~For me the best shot of both Ararats I´ve ever seen. Seldom weather conditions. --Hubertl 15:02, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 18:38, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 19:45, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- dllu (t,c) 20:19, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 20:24, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:23, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 23:01, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Hubertl. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:34, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good visibility. --Ximonic (talk) 04:36, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:25, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --محمد بوعلام عصامي *«Md.Boualam» (talk) 06:45, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Wonderfully volumetric picture with great contrast between the mountains and the city, and viewed in full size, a bunch of birds are clearly visible in the middle and high altitudes. The photographer is really talented. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:04, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:20, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support One of the best skyline+mountains images of a city I've ever seen. Daniel Case (talk) 18:17, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:31, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 18:33, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support--SusikMkr (talk) 15:56, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 08:23, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes

File:Paris Notre-Dame Southeast View 01.JPG, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2015 at 08:09:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#France
Info Southeast view of cathedral Notre-Dame de Paris, France. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:09, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Uoaei1 (talk) 08:09, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 08:21, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 10:53, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - That's a great picture that will look good on the front page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:56, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:14, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:57, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 18:38, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:22, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 04:35, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:21, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent shot of an iconic building in an iconic city from an iconic angle. I like this recent spate of nominations from Paris ... depuis 13 novembre, nous sommes tous parisiens ... non? Daniel Case (talk) 16:47, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oui, bien sûr! --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:38, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:08, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 08:22, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#France

File:AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9043.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2015 at 23:04:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings
Info all by Hubertl -- Hubertl 23:04, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hubertl 23:04, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:32, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done and an interesting church. --Code (talk) 06:17, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Code. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:19, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:54, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Lovely. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:17, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:07, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:33, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 13:15, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:14, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Beautiful. Atsme 📞 16:16, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:26, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support--ArildV (talk) 21:19, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 22:17, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Pudelek (talk) 11:23, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:06, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:23, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:48, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not totally perfect—some areas seem a little blown, but they're such a small part of the overall image that I wouldn't support it. Daniel Case (talk) 03:56, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Piling up... --Yann (talk) 07:01, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:44, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:01, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings

File:BiachebbCaiman crocodilus 01.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2015 at 20:38:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles
Info created & uploaded by BiacheB - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 20:38, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 20:38, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry,what's happened to the back groung? is very strange LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:09, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The background is dissolved in bokeh. --Johann Jaritz 06:04, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Oppose Sorry, Per Livioandronico2013. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:06, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Wished to support this, but the background... Pity... -- Pofka (talk) 13:14, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, per others. The face, though, is lovely. --Tremonist (talk) 14:21, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. Daniel Case (talk) 00:50, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Moral support It won't change anything, but I don't see any issue with the background. Yann (talk) 13:47, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:03, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lower Manhattan from Brooklyn May 2015 panorama.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2015 at 20:45:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
Info created & uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 20:45, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 20:45, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:08, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - That's a truly beautiful and impressive dusk photo. Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:31, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:02, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 22:47, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for the nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:59, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:20, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:55, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:07, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 13:15, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
weak good work, not perfect in the details. --Hubertl 15:33, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - nicely done. Atsme 📞 16:18, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support good cityscape--ArildV (talk) 21:20, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 07:40, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:22, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good. Although a little bit soft. --Code (talk) 14:36, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:49, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I wish I had been able to !vote for this earlier. As Hubertl notes, it is not perfect. But I think those imperfections are the inevitable result of doing this with a long exposure, and the image is better off for that tradeoff. Daniel Case (talk) 00:59, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Piling up... --Yann (talk) 07:02, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support New York, New York ! Well done !! --Gzzz (talk) 12:08, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:44, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:02, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas

File:SM Alcáçova June 2015-1.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2015 at 16:20:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info Unusual round glazed tiles (azulejo) in the church of Santa Maria da Alcáçova (18th century). Castle of Montemor-o-Velho, Portugal. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:20, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:20, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I'd observe that the image appears to my naked eye to be slightly asymmetrical, with slightly more white space to the left of the tiles than their right. However, that doesn't bother me. The photo looks quite clear. The tiles are beautiful, and I find it pleasant to move my eyes around them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:54, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - it seemed a bit washed so I downloaded it and tweaked it with a tonal adjustment to see if it made a difference and it did. Just a suggestion. Atsme😊📞 18:31, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your offer Atsme but this is how it really looks like. The colours of the azulejos are usually not satured. Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:43, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I was referring to tonal adjustments (levels and curves) not colour, but I understand what you're saying about saturated colours vs muted or pastel. Have a wonderful day! Atsme😊📞 19:29, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Hubertl 22:54, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:47, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is it really a Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media propose? I mean, just talking about the category! :) Sturm (talk) 01:31, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Info I'm not sure myself. The alternative is Commons:Featured pictures/Objects. Should I put it there? Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:40, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes. Since you took the picture yourself, it is better in "Objects". Yann (talk) 08:50, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Nice texture and detail. Daniel Case (talk) 04:08, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:22, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 11:51, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 13:11, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:14, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:50, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:48, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:56, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:Skansen, Stockholm (by Pudelek) 3.JPG, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2015 at 20:55:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 20:55, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 20:55, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:42, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:11, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 06:28, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Simple, no Wow. Good picture already. --XRay ^talk 06:46, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Simple, nice and definitely QI, but I don't see why this should be FP. --Code (talk) 15:17, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely symmetry, color and detail. Daniel Case (talk) 22:47, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~{{neutral}} as XRay.~~ In this case, the composition would be better to present this house in the surrounding ambient. IMHO. Very Humble, of course! ;-) But a good technical quality, anyway. --Hubertl 10:55, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Daniel. --Tremonist (talk) 15:34, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support changed from Neutral to a weak support. The clear composition itself convinced me at the very end. --Hubertl 09:32, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support--M★Zaplotnik ^(edits) 16:52, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:57, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Taali mõisa peahoone.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2015 at 17:54:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
InfoTaali manor, Southwestern Estonia. All by Ivar (talk) 17:54, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 17:54, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:57, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support In german i'd like to say: "It's round". The car... so what, its real, you can't destroy it. --Ralf Roleček 18:03, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:09, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Such fine detail, although I wish the tree at left hadn't been so clipped. Daniel Case (talk) 05:26, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice mood. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 06:25, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Sorry. It's a very good picture, but FP? The car is disturbing, I miss the Wow. --XRay ^talk 06:43, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 09:17, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry, but the left side misses any details. No FP at all, also not any wow for me.--Hubertl 10:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:35, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:58, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications

File:Yellow-headed caracara (Milvago chimachima) on capybara (Hydrochoeris hydrochaeris).JPG, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2015 at 15:04:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Info all by Charlesjsharp -- Charles (talk) 15:04, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charles (talk) 15:04, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very noisy. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 15:26, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The situation is so fun that I have difficulties not to support. But atleast it would need some color denoising. About other noise reducal i'm not sure as some actual details might easily get lost. The regular grain, in this case, might be the lesser evil. --Ximonic (talk) 19:33, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Support Slightly better. --Ximonic (talk) 21:12, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral per Ximonic. Support Acceptable now. Daniel Case (talk) 05:23, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose Nice, but noisy nad IMO too low DoF. The bird isn't sharp. --XRay ^talk 06:45, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support interesting and rare sight --Mile (talk) 19:09, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 20:00, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Mile and excellent light. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:19, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support It wow. The slightly noise in the background is acceptable.--Hubertl 10:58, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ~~Strong noise on the subject,~~ very dark shadows and clipped highlights. Very cool subject though. — Julian H.^✈ 11:34, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Beautiful image, but for me no FP quality.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:50, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support "It will also take ticks from cattle, and is locally called "tickbird"." A good documentary of cleaning symbiosis. J e e 02:19, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I can't refrain from supporting this one. --Cayambe (talk) 17:10, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful Oppose. Strong noise in the shadow area on capybara. Quality is below FP, sorry -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:13, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Daniel Case: @XRay: @Ximonic: @Famberhorst: @Julian Herzog: @George Chernilevsky: Sorry it's taken me so long to respond. Have reduced chroma noise so have another look and see if you prefer it. I know it's not perfect, but you've got to grab it while you can! Charles (talk) 23:07, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is still grainy but at least it's not as bad as colour noise. The picture is just so whimsical though, I can't not support. dllu (t,c) 23:47, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think I saw the first version of this earlier. In this version, the capybara and the bird look clear to me in full size, and since they're the focus of the picture, it's fine that everything else is to a lesser or greater extent blurred. And it's a really good image. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:26, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice, but per others--Lmbuga (talk) 15:28, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Too nice a couple to oppose. --Tremonist (talk) 15:36, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Going with wow and what are the chances of it ever happening again. Eyes are drawn directly to the subject. --Atsme😊📞 18:11, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- KTC (talk) 01:45, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:59, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals

File:Sesimbra March 2015-2a.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2015 at 16:22:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info Couple with a baby at the beach of Sesimbra, Portugal. Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:22, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:22, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support great picture! --Ralf Roleček 17:15, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I like it, too. One of the things that's wonderful about this picture is how it has life (movement or rhythm, if you like) throughout. The sea has ripples and the beach has tracks, and all of that really catches the eye. By the way, I wouldn't say this picture is merely about the couple with the baby. This is truly a picture of people in a landscape (seascape, if you like). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:01, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Something is missing, but I can not say what. Sorry. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:46, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Love the simplicity of it, but the ocean is noisy. Daniel Case (talk) 04:05, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, doesn't really work. The people shouldn't be placed in the center of the picture, I think. The light is not really pleasing, too. And the postprocessing looks improvable, but I don't really know what the problem is. Maybe a little bit too much sharpness. --Code (talk) 06:24, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too many footprints and tire-prints horizontally, sorry. --Laitche (talk) 12:02, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support for the colours. --Tremonist (talk) 14:09, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:15, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:08, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:ESTCube-1 has woman’s touch.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2015 at 14:17:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info created and uploaded by Erik Kulu - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 14:17, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 14:17, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - This strikes me as an important picture, so I think it should be a Valued image. I'm unsure about this as a Featured picture, because as much as I appreciate the importance of the subject and the accompanying story, the image itself is not so clear. But I think there should be some suitable way of featuring this as a striking and important image. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:48, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose technical and aesthetic quality of the photo are average. However, if used in the context of an article such as English Wikipedia, this might become FP there as a good illustration. --Pine^✉ 17:07, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 17:08, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the technical quality: noisy and unsharp. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:09, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose in my eyes there are too many confusion around the szene. --Ralf Roleček 20:18, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per Ralf. White balance is also too blue. Yann (talk) 20:54, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:12, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The image is OK but not FP technically or on wow. The filename and description are not suitable for Commons, and reads more like something one might find in a local newspaper. It's also rather patronising. While encouraging more women into science/technology/engineering is needed and good, it isn't Commons place to make comments like this. -- Colin (talk) 09:07, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Kruusamägi (talk) 14:01, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:42, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Rondeau 29122014 774.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2015 at 06:15:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Johann Jaritz -- Johann Jaritz 06:15, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- --Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:15, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 13:17, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 15:26, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice winter mood--ArildV (talk) 21:08, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:46, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:04, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If you want my support,you must cut the people on the right. Thanks LivioAndronico ^(talk) 22:20, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done As I really do want your support, Livio, I cloned out the people on the right side. --Johann Jaritz 04:06, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Support Ok now,nice good white LivioAndronico ^(talk) 06:36, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support perfect colors. --Ralf Roleček 23:09, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:58, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 07:39, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 12:19, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:05, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:27, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 14:35, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:48, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support The gazebo makes the difference ... Daniel Case (talk) 05:14, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:15, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wladyslaw (talk) 15:29, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:42, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:39, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Pomegranate flower.JPG, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2015 at 12:12:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
Info Featured picture on Arabic Wikipedia.created by [[User: Faris knight|]] - uploaded by Faris knight - nominated by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 -- ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 12:12, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 12:12, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for a close up pictures it is not sharp enogh. --Hubertl 15:30, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry but also rather unpleasant lighting.--ArildV (talk) 21:07, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per ArildV. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:06, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Tremonist (talk) 14:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Hubertl. Daniel Case (talk) 05:15, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Thanks a lot David, but I see it's only quality image. Faris El-Gwely (talk) 14:57, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:40, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Church of Saint-Germain l'Auxerrois Ambulatory, Paris, France - Diliff.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2015 at 13:14:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Diliff -- Diliff (talk) 13:14, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Diliff (talk) 13:14, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:58, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:45, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Do you really feel it deserve FP status, or you give a try ? --Mile (talk) 19:08, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Do you give me a review, or do you just ask questions? ;-) Diliff (talk) 20:26, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - I did think it was a good FP candidate though. It's not a traditional composition, but I think it's interesting and high quality. Diliff (talk) 20:27, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - Mile, if you're going to oppose, the least you could do is frame it as a critique rather than a rhetorical question. Does my motivation for nomination has any relevance? Anyway, you're of course entitled to your opinion but so far it seems others are supporting it, so I don't think I was crazy to think it could be FP. Diliff (talk) 13:40, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I still have a long long long way...--Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:28, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support me too, Christian! --Hubertl 21:14, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:45, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Diliff for photography is like Lindsey Vonn for ski races. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 06:21, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 12:43, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Whenever things are in danger of getting dull around here, Diliff returns. Exceeds your usual standards ... I like this variation on the angle here. Daniel Case (talk) 18:29, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:45, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Don´t get me wrong, David, it seems to you maybe that I ignore your nominations pretty often. The point is, as long I can´t automate it, it costs me too much time for something, which is clear already. Take this as a general homage for your work. I can do it better while voting for them at POTY. --Hubertl 15:09, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not offended if you don't vote on every one of my images, don't worry! Diliff (talk) 19:19, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Your work of interiors is reference, not just for me! --Hubertl 19:47, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 18:33, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:32, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 20:37, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 06:28, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

File:Contaminated Rio Doce Water Flows into the Atlantic - NASA.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2015 at 01:48:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Satellite images
Info created by NASA - uploaded and nominated by Sturm (talk) 01:48, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info Almost two weeks after the Bento Rodrigues dam disaster, the iron waste reached the Atlantic Ocean waters, configuring the worst environmental disaster in Brazil's history.
Support -- Sturm (talk) 01:48, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - That's sad to look at. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:15, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very useful and high EV--ArildV (talk) 21:17, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:03, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Arild. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Tremonist (talk) 14:24, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Arild Daniel Case (talk) 05:08, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 15:52, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:24, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 14:15, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 06:32, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Satellite images

File:Fluorescence rainbow.JPG, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2015 at 23:30:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info created and uploaded by Maxim Bilovitskiy - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 23:30, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 23:30, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Colorful and well balanced. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 03:40, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Fun. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:18, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:01, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment interesting, but the colours are not in the right place for it to be called a rainbow. Charles (talk) 10:35, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Johann. --Tremonist (talk) 14:34, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:47, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 15:48, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 20:07, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking and different ... I'll take "rainbow" in the figurative sense. Daniel Case (talk) 00:19, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support $Jacopo Werther iγ\partialψ=mψ$ 22:03, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:11, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Brackenheim (talk) 13:23, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 06:34, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:Libélula (Tramea sp), isla Lobos, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-25, DD 61.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2015 at 22:17:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata
Info Dragonfly (Tramea sp), isla Lobos, islas Galápagos, Ecuador. All by me, Poc o² 22:17, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 22:17, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:19, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Support. Excellent! -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:56, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:00, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. You're very good at landscape shots. It's amazing that you can pull this off as well :-) --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 07:25, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:21, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is such a high quality image, I must support it, but I don't like the crop at all - can you crop out the right hand leaf? The identity of this species has been debated in a recent FPC and I agree there is insufficient evidence to decide between t. calverti and t. cophysa darwini. Charles (talk) 10:52, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent :) --Laitche (talk) 12:33, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:30, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support And 10. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:06, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 20:33, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 15:50, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Shallow DoF (although I don't know how much more that could be improved, honestly) can easily be forgiven with pastel backdrop like this. Daniel Case (talk) 18:16, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support From this view, I can confirm this as a female. Like the crop too. J e e 02:33, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Although I don't need the leaf on the right side. I would crop it. --Hockei (talk) 10:37, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:40, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald 23:39, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Brackenheim (talk) 13:25, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 06:33, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Odonata

File:Megabalanus coccopoma.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2015 at 19:54:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals
Info created by Marina Karaevangelou - uploaded by Marina Karaevangelou - nominated by Ggia -- Ggia (talk) 19:54, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is nominated for the European Science Photo Competition 2015 which runs also in Greece by the local Wikimedia Community User Group. ~~Do not vote oppose the image due to the tag. I will ask Marina Karaevangelou to remove this copyright tag (or I will do it).~~ logo has been removed -- Ggia (talk) 19:54, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support--H. Krisp (talk) 19:59, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Marina Karaevangelou (talk) 22:08, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:48, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Like from Ridley Scott`s movie ALIEN. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 06:14, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 08:56, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 12:45, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The original seems natural and better I think current version is a bit too boost contrast. --Laitche (talk) 13:40, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as Laitche, I don´t see anything sharp, the lighting is focused and overemphasized for effect. This, beyond the watermark issue. --Hubertl 16:25, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Hubertl. Lovely colors, but that alone won't do it for this one. Daniel Case (talk) 05:30, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Hubertl.LivioAndronico ^(talk) 23:04, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Laitche. --Tremonist (talk) 15:28, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 10:46, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

* Oppose For others --Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:29, 10 December 2015 (UTC) Striked --Cart (talk) 19:41, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support--M★Zaplotnik ^(edits) 16:53, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Info Post-promoted due to sock double vote. 12 October 2018 --Cart (talk) 18:13, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 18:13, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals

File:Old Crissy Field Coast Guard Station in the fog (December 2015).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2015 at 18:57:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:57, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:57, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great composition and mood. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:06, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree--ArildV (talk) 21:02, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice composition! --Pudelek (talk) 22:12, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Da möchte ich auch mal fotografieren! Ist dort eigentlich immer Nebel? Konkret zum Bild: Es gibt unzählige Fotos dieses Motivs, allerdings hebt sich dieses durch die Häuser im Vordergrund ab. Sehr schön gesehen. Sorry, my english is very bad .. the clear view of the houses in foreground and the fog in back are a very good alternative to the many pictures of the bridge. --Ralf Roleček 23:06, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nicht immer, aber fast immer in der Früh bis ca 9 Uhr.--Hubertl 19:30, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 02:07, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:14, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - That's a beautiful photo, and as someone who's visited SF several times, I really feel the fog in the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:24, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 06:07, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:59, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 08:56, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:19, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition. --Laitche (talk) 12:24, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:29, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:18, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding composition! -- Pofka (talk) 15:50, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Brackenheim (talk) 13:25, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 06:32, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Plitvice Lakes National Park BW 2014-10-13 12-55-11 DMix.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2015 at 14:55:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created by - uploaded - nominated by -- Berthold Werner (talk) 14:55, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 14:55, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:08, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
weak Oppose I was ready to support until I noticed the obvious sharpness issues. Schade. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:48, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:45, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good mood, I guess this editing is reducing the blown highlight and CAs in the water but the result does not work well imo. --Laitche (talk) 13:31, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 18:30, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Martin. --Tremonist (talk) 15:31, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 06:29, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zuiderhof 01.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2015 at 22:20:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info c/u by Hans Peter Föllmi - nominated by me. — Julian H.^✈ 22:20, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 22:20, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect composition. I am deeply impressed. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 06:04, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry, but I´m not impressed at all. Overaccentuated sky, noisy included dark edges at the pilars, unreal dark/light balance in the foreground.--Hubertl 10:47, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Hubert. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:05, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very nice composition for me but sadly too noisy, maybe oversharpened? and too raise up contrast? I wish the creator could redevelop this foto :) --Laitche (talk) 13:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose a very nice composition, but too noisy for an FP-image. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:09, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Hubertl—issue obvious even at thumb. Daniel Case (talk) 03:19, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Hubertl. -- Pofka (talk) 18:35, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per most of the others. --Tremonist (talk) 15:25, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Just review without vote: this image has the rhythm, like a music. I understand why it was nominated and why received a support from Johann Jaritz. However, there are issues with a quality... -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:27, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
George: You are absolutely right, this picture has rhythm! It´s a pity, that it doesn't match the quality too. --Hubertl 19:44, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 06:31, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lobo marino (Zalophus californianus wollebaeki), Punta Pitt, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 11.JPG, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2015 at 07:48:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Info Galapagos see lion (Zalophus californianus wollebaeki) in Punta Pitt, San Cristóbal Island, Galápagos Islands. All by me, Poc o² 07:48, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 07:48, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
strong A wonderful composition! --Hubertl 10:43, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:07, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support indeed a wonderful composition! _{(The colors appear a bit strange though)} --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:45, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support The place reminds the Brazilian beaches. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:49, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 18:36, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful oppose Love the image but unfortunately for me it is too noisy and unsharp in the background to support for FP. Daniel Case (talk) 19:58, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Daniel while I don't disagree that the background is hazy (not an issue for me) I don't think that's noise you are seeing in the background (more like atmospheric conditions) and this is a 50MP picture so you could reduce it 50% and still have a 12MP image (or 66% and have a 21MP image) with no "noise" at all. -- Colin (talk) 20:58, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If it was atmospheric conditions alone I think the nearer cliff, the beach and the water just offshore would be sharper than they are. Daniel Case (talk) 03:01, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Question - I'm not nearly the serious photographer most of you are, and this is the first day I've voted for or against promoting any files to Featured status, so I'll give my observations and then ask a question. First, I love the composition of this photograph. However, at full resolution, what I'm seeing is that the sea lion is completely clear, but both the near sand and the closer cliffs look so fuzzy, they're almost pixellated. Colin, are you saying that's a normal product of photographing at such a large file size? On the face of it, I would vote to oppose featuring this picture on the basis that it's so blurry at full resolution, but I'm holding back because I may lack sufficient knowledge to judge this picture adequately. Is clarity at full resolution not one of the criteria for promoting a photo to Featured status? Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:28, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ikan/Daniel there's a kind of speckled hazy effect in the distance. I'm really not sure what it is. It doesn't look much like the noise on my camera. And ISO 250 on a modern FF camera shouldn't be noisy at all. Maybe Poco has applied some sharpening globally that has brought out/added to the noise, and the use of a sharpening mask might avoid this. My objection really is that even if this is noise, it is only visible when viewed from 30cm at 100% and at 100% on a standard 100dpi monitor, the image is over 2.2 metres wide. It could be printed at 240dpi a metre wide and you wouldn't see any noise at all. So I really object to complaints about noise at this sort of level in a huge 50MP image. All that does is encourage people to upload downsized images to avoid "pixel peeping" comments. The complaint about the background being hazy (whether focus or heat-haze or both) and whether that is good or bad is your subjective judgement. But I'd suggest you judge that aspect on the image as a whole, and not when viewing a 2.2m-wide image from 30cm. If you look at this link to a 3000x2000 6MP version then perhaps that is a more reasonable size to judge. 6MP is enough to print at 240dpi A4 size. -- Colin (talk) 11:25, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It's a lot clearer at that size, though the sand still looks just a bit hazy to me; however, that could be because I already viewed the full-sized image. This photo has a great composition and I won't stand in the way of it. Overall, it is quite good at that size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:13, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Colin (talk) 20:58, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Great composition, but the focal plane is too thin for me. --Ivar (talk) 08:24, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:23, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I can't really oppose, but I agree with Ivar. Yann (talk) 18:55, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:52, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals

File:Lviv fire station 2015 G1.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2015 at 15:22:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:22, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info Old fire station in Lviv. Close-up top part of building. Erected in 1901, architect is Juliusz Karol Hochberger (1840 — 1905). For this building a lot of bricks of a special form was used (well visible on this photo).
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:22, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I´m really sorry, George, but for me it´s clearly no FP. Bad, unclear composition, oversaturated roof bricks, tilted. And at least no wow. --Hubertl 19:01, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, any opinion are welcomed. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:18, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral I share Hubertl's objections, but I think my suggested crop might deal with them. Daniel Case (talk) 21:24, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry ; per Hubert. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:49, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Hubertl + shadow. -- Pofka (talk) 12:16, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The tilt needs to be repaired. Besides that, it's mostly the shadow that might disturb the viewer. The crop could perhaps be a little larger than Daniel suggested, just a little to get in more red and blue, but that might be matter of taste. --Tremonist (talk) 13:13, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks to all for reviews. I will create and nominate cropped version next time. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:42, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:42, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:45, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Valingu siire.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2015 at 06:46:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info Railway crossover. Valingu, Estonia. All by Ivar (talk) 06:46, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 06:46, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Sorry, I'm not thrilled with this image. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:07, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 12:46, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
{{o}} even though this is something I might normally !vote for because, as a frequent photographer and videographer of rail-related images I do not think we should be encouraging people to take pictures while standing on (to all appearances) active railroad tracks, anywhere in the world. IOW, #TracksAreForTrains). Support Now that I've put a warning in the image description. Daniel Case (talk) 18:38, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Info To Daniel: I'm a railway engineer and spend some of my work time on the tracks. This image is useful for my work. --Ivar (talk) 06:11, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Iifar: OK, but not everyone looking at the picture is going to intuitively know that. Maybe you could put some sort of "don't imitate this unless you are in a safe situation" warning in the image description (I would be happy to write some English text for you if you want)? Daniel Case (talk) 17:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case: be my guest. --Ivar (talk) 18:19, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Prickling. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 05:04, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mood… 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:53, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice perspective with nice atmosphere and I feel originality, FP for me. --Laitche (talk) 13:07, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. --Tremonist (talk) 15:24, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
weak oppose nice QI, but FP? No... --Pudelek (talk) 17:02, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Laitche. Yann (talk) 10:14, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- KTC (talk) 01:49, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:56, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:51, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:2015 E-papieros mod 01.JPG, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2015 at 21:16:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info All by me -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:16, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:16, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:24, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tack-sharp. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:56, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 08:23, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 09:56, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 18:37, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 19:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A QI but nothing spectacular. It isn't very high resolution or detailed/sharp. The orientation is odd. It would be more useful if the background was actually white or if the cigarette was being used. -- Colin (talk) 20:35, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orientation is such that it could be seen the most important supply side. A completely white background in my opinion looks unnatural. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:41, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you rotate this anti-clockwise 90 degrees, the cigarette is vertical (is it is in use), the writing is readable, and exactly the same features are visible. The background here is artificial anyway -- it isn't an environmental shot. I think then to get FP with an everyday object on an off-white background, it would have to be technically spectacular photo. But I'd be much more interested if you could photograph this in some creative lighting. -- Colin (talk) 21:07, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I agree with Colin regarding the resolution and sharpness and the fact that it is not spectacular. The picture has plenty of encyclopedic value, but it is lacking in the photographic "wow" factor. Perhaps it would have a better chance at being nominated on one of the Wikipedias instead. dllu (t,c) 23:32, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow, per Colin. Daniel Case (talk) 04:03, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree this is a good and useful picture but, simply put, it didn't really strike me in other way. Sorry. --Ximonic (talk) 04:44, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The photo is at least nicely done. --Tremonist (talk) 15:20, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 18:34, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 22:14, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:56, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:45, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:Bay of Kotor from Lepetani's road.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2015 at 20:52:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Gzzz -- Gzzz (talk) 20:52, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gzzz (talk) 20:52, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:41, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 09:38, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:17, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 13:10, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:16, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question i think, the photo is a little bit too light and too cold. I have upload a other version: File:Bay of Kotor from Lepetani's road-1.jpg --Ralf Roleček 13:45, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your version is a better composition. I find it easy to move my eye around the picture frame in your version, but not the other one. However, by reducing the light, did you make a version that inaccurately represented how the scene actually looked? Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:43, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Info We had the same issue with another picture (File:Silver Wind bay of Kotor 2.jpg)... I agree with Ralf Roleček : his version is nice ! But the light was really harsh and my version corresponds more to reality... Of course, if most of you prefer Ralf's version, I'll give up :-)) -Gzzz (talk) 16:32, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For whatever it's worth, I like your other picture better, as that day was darker than this one and the ship helps me move my eye around the picture frame. I am not going to oppose this picture being promoted, though; I may not love it as much as some other pictures, but I feel no impulsion to be negative and I'm happy to defer to the others. Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:42, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it is a pretty scene. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:06, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Halavar (talk) 17:49, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Pretty. Do they have any rental cottages nearby? *g* Atsme😊📞 20:58, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:36, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support As sharp as it needs to be; well-composed scene. Daniel Case (talk) 00:56, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too blurry, imho. --Laitche (talk) 11:47, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Question Where do you see it blurry Laitche ? --Gzzz (talk) 16:22, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Overall... --Laitche (talk) 09:01, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Ralf's version is better. Yann (talk) 07:05, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Gzzz (talk) 23:47, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:2015.08.05.-09-Anglersee Huettenfeld-Lampertheim--Grosser Blaupfeil-Paarungsrad.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2015 at 18:25:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family_:_Libellulidae_.28Skimmers.29
Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 18:25, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hockei (talk) 18:25, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:28, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:32, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 19:47, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose That leaf that cuts through the middle is too distracting.--Fotoriety (talk) 21:56, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I have to agree the leaf is quite dominant. I can't get over it. Otherwise, of course, a very nice catch! --Ximonic (talk) 04:51, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I respect the observations of those of you who are in opposition to promoting this picture, but I differ with you. My reasoning is that I'm looking at this photo as a composition including a black-tailed skimmer, not as a Valued image of a black-tailed skimmer. My reaction is that the interplay between the leaf and the skimmer's back wings makes the composition more enjoyable for me to look at, so I think it's not a bad thing if it takes away a bit of the singleminded focus from the skimmer. I could see wanting the leaf to be slightly more blurred, especially on the right side where it turns brown, but I don't find that enough of a detail to change my vote. I don't know whether my way of looking at this picture would be orthodox or unorthodox among photographers, but it comes from my being the son of a painter and looking at photographs similarly to how I look at paintings. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:43, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful insect. --Tremonist (talk) 13:17, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:27, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - the detail is very nice, and I actually think the parallels created by the leaf and wings add a different dimension to the overall composition. I like it. --Atsme😊📞 18:42, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Mild support I don't find the leaf as distracting as the opposers do, and the detail on the insect is great. Daniel Case (talk) 19:42, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 10:56, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Odonata

File:Holy Trinity Sloane Street Church Window - Diliff.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2015 at 13:42:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Diliff -- Diliff (talk) 13:42, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Diliff (talk) 13:42, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support More "light pictures". 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:09, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 14:21, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:21, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 14:25, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 15:42, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:51, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 17:04, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 20:47, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:12, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 06:53, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:17, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 08:33, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 08:48, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Could you please provide some technical information? I'm curious which lens you used. --Code (talk) 10:20, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I used my Sigma 50mm f/1.4 at f/11. It's made from 5 bracketed exposures of 1/500, 1/80, 1/13, 1/2 and 1.3s exposures, and 3 rows by 3 columns. Diliff (talk) 13:16, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:21, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ahhhh ... Daniel Case (talk) 18:47, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:34, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question - A request: Please add the category for the city this church is in. Thanks a lot. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:54, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think a category for the city is the answer (if you follow the categories upwards you can see that it's in London), but I will add the info to the image page description as you're right, it's not clear at all. Diliff (talk) 11:00, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 10:53, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

File:Lyriothemis acigastra female at Kadavoor.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2015 at 17:04:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata
Info created by Jkadavoor - uploaded by Jkadavoor with modifications by Christian Ferrer - nominated by Pine -- Pine^✉ 17:04, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pine^✉ 17:04, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for the nomination, for those interested there is one of my geek delirium in the image talk page. It's always a pleasure to look at the photos of Jee... --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:51, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:57, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:13, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks Pine for the nom. It is an extremely rare dragonfly. It is assumed (we have no data so far) that they lay eggs in rain water collected in small holes and canals. I observed the mating and egg laying process near my home; which is the only record and observation of that process so far. We all including odonatists from Kerala are waiting for next June to see it again! Their adults are only recorded in June-July from the other place (Kannur, Kerala) too. J e e 01:14, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - That's very good insect photography. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:36, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Ikan. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:07, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Only fair the female gets FP too ;-) -- Colin (talk) 09:11, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:22, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charles (talk) 12:43, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice detail on the insect, and lovely green in the bokeh. Daniel Case (talk) 22:17, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:33, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 12:26, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Colin, Ikan, and Daniel. --Tremonist (talk) 12:54, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 10:52, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Odonata

File:Mosasaurus ichthyosaurus.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2015 at 20:21:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
Info created by Heinrich Harder - uploaded and nominated by Sturm (talk) 20:21, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
InfoThis is a life restoration of a Mosasaurus painted by the German artist and an art professor at the Prussian Academy of Arts in Berlin Heinrich Harder (1858-1935).
Support -- Sturm (talk) 20:21, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:42, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:17, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 13:10, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:16, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:49, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice texture. Daniel Case (talk) 21:12, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 11:57, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 10:55, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media

Pittsburgh panoramas, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2015 at 03:28:18 (UTC)

Pittsburgh in daytime
Pittsburgh in nighttime

Info created by dllu - uploaded by dllu - nominated by dllu -- dllu (t,c) 03:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- dllu (t,c) 03:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Info The nighttime panorama is an FP on English Wikipedia. dllu (t,c) 03:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support - For whatever reason, the full-sized photos aren't loading on my computer, but I'm willing to support featuring both of these panoramas based on their great composition, beauty, view at the size shown here and fact that they're both Quality images already. But shouldn't there be two separate nominations, one for each picture? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:47, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think the two pictures are sufficiently related to each other by theme, so it makes sense to nominate them as a set. From the guidelines for set nominations, it's acceptable to nominate a set """If a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way""", for example, """A sequence of images showing the passage of time.""" And yes, it is a known issue that the 200 megapixel image takes a long time to load and may crash some browsers. dllu (t,c) 07:01, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I get your point about these two as a series. But how does that work in terms of their being shown on the front page? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:11, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't thought this far yet. dllu (t,c) 07:25, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ikan try the Zoom viewer links on the file description page. It makes such image more of an interactive experience. What to put on the front page isn't really our concern. -- Colin (talk) 10:53, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's really cool. Thank you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:24, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support though the nighttime picture should be denoised a little bit. I'd also support individual noms --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:04, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:07, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support, even though both panoramas aren't cut in exactly the same way and slightly differ in perspective. --Tremonist (talk) 13:47, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 14:29, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 15:45, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 20:05, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:23, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 10:22, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hockei (talk) 10:29, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 10:53, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:54, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:36, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:55, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Brackenheim (talk) 13:22, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 14:10, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 10:54, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes

File:Lviv fire station 2015 G4.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2015 at 19:51:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:51, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Second try.
Info Old fire station in Lviv. Close-up top part of building. Erected in 1901, architect is Juliusz Karol Hochberger (1840 — 1905). For this building a lot of bricks of a special form was used (well visible on this photo).
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:51, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Distortion. --Claus 20:23, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the round window is no round. --Ralf Roleček 20:50, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support even, when weak. I don´t care so much about the distortion, this is not avoidable from this angle.--Hubertl 22:56, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per other. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:16, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sheepish oppose since this crop was my suggestion. But it's visibly distorted. Daniel Case (talk) 01:56, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Yes, it's distorted, sorry. --Tremonist (talk) 12:56, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:58, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:58, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Evoluir para conectar.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2015 at 21:24:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
Info created and uploaded by Heris Luiz Cordeiro Rocha - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:24, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Second nomination. I still feel that we will have no more other wow-composition FPC like this one. I know there are quality issues, but I have no courage to oppose. Really great. -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:24, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - This is a nice picture and an interesting motif of pylons. But what makes it Featured? I mean, I like it, but for a Featured Photo, the entirely black area at the bottom bugs me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:28, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The big and spectacular sunset (or sunshot) with a interesting perspective made by pylons. The black area is common at this time especially when there is no artificial lighting. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 02:24, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for answering. I'm not convinced, I guess I'm sort of Neutral. Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:00, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Colin's points from the original nomination still stand. And to be honest the more I look at it the less I can forgive its asymmetry. Daniel Case (talk) 06:22, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That was quite recent. What are the rules or guidelines on how long a time should pass before the same picture is renominated? I'd be inclined to

Oppose the nomination on the basis that it was last discussed one month ago. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:55, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose Jpeg artefacts. I even surprised how many positive vote the first time when I see the quality of this image. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:10, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Tremonist (talk) 13:39, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:08, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:46, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:2010-01-03-schnee-im-nebel-by-RalfR-38.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2015 at 20:09:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info River Oder at Sikierki (Poland) - all by Ralf Roleček
Support -- Ralf Roleček 20:09, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment QI, but it seems tilted and the quality not good IMO--Lmbuga (talk) 22:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I like it and don't perceive tilting or quality problems. Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:50, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:20, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nicely composed but I'm seeing some CA along the edge of the river, and it's entirely too unsharp in the background. Daniel Case (talk) 05:30, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - even weak - mainly because of the composition and the mood. I would appreciate, if you could clear the CA as Daniel demanded. The rest is fog, which is unsharp by definition. --Hubertl 09:36, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:47, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose peer Lmbuga - it's tilted and the quality is not good --Pudelek (talk) 11:18, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sharpness is just too poor for a FP. -- Pofka (talk) 12:04, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Ralf Roleček 12:13, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:44, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wall April 2015-1.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2015 at 22:47:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info Long live minimalism! Detail of a curved wall in the Belém Cultural Centre building, Lisbon. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:47, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:47, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose The upper part of the image is slightly blurred. It's too bad. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:58, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm sorry, this doesn't work for me ---Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:35, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I love this struktures more than anything else. It´s a pity, that the upper part is unsharp. --Hubertl 12:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Qualified support Given the subject I think I can forgive this degree of unsharpness. Daniel Case (talk) 15:59, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose is the wall distorted or need the image a "pincushion distortion" correction? --Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:53, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

According to the author, the wall is curved. The straight vertical lines indicate there is little geometric distortion. dllu (t,c) 07:33, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I really don't think that a stone wall is a good subject for FP. Also, the sharpness is not good. Brick walls are commonly used to test lens sharpness, and many lens review websites use similar pictures to compare lenses. Most decent prime lenses fare better than this. A tripod and f/8 would be needed for a sharp image from corner to corner, especially as the scene is not planar and this lens seems to suffer from some field curvature. dllu (t,c) 07:33, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Dllu. Nothing extraordinary here. -- Pofka (talk) 12:10, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:13, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:47, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Three-storied pagoda in Chikubu island (10301225845).jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2015 at 20:35:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info created by Takashi Hososhima - uploaded by The Photographer - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:35, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice symmetry. -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:35, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I love the symmetry, but I think it lacks a little sharpness. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:56, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weaker support than I would have liked per Medium. Daniel Case (talk) 15:57, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sad opposition, this is a very beautiful shot, but the lack of care to take the shot ( o.O this was a NIKON D4), made this a normal photo, not a FP. -- RTA 09:53, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I reluctantly and apologetically agree with this. I think this is a very pretty photo that deserves some kind of acknowledgement and praise, but I'd hesitate to make it a Featured Picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:30, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weakest support per Daniel. --Tremonist (talk) 13:22, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:05, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Ivar (talk) 06:24, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Foggy Morning Lantern on Ioannovsky Bridge.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2015 at 20:27:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges
Info created by Dmitry Ivanov and Mavra Petrova - uploaded by Dmitry Ivanov - nominated by Dmitry Ivanov -- Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 20:27, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support ...Petersburg of Dostoevsky... A foggy morning on the Ioannovsky Bridge. -- Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 20:27, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The fog does nothing. Sorry. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:54, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow. Daniel Case (talk) 15:50, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Gray. -- Pofka (talk) 12:12, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Tremonist (talk) 13:20, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This photo was an attempt to show a dull, drab, depressing city (that is why the photo is gray, Pofka, it hasn’t to have bright colours), it was an attempt to show a city from point of view of a humble man... Judging the votes, the attempt wasn’t successful: a photo must “hit” without verbose explanations. Thanks for reviews. Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 19:52, 15 December 2015 (UTC).[reply]
I withdraw my nomination. Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 21:03, 16 December 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:36, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abendsonne am Rio Solimoes.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2015 at 11:24:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
Info created and uploaded by CHK46 - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:24, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support A painting of the Amazon sunset. -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:24, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow. Daniel Case (talk) 14:56, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very noisy. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:47, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:49, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:2015.07.07.-07-Mulde Eilenburg--Duenen-Sandlaufkaefer.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2015 at 16:19:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Carabidae_.28Ground_Beetles.29
Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 16:19, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hockei (talk) 16:19, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - detail is very nice. --Atsme😊📞 18:23, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:34, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:44, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Atsme. Daniel Case (talk) 02:53, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 13:11, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:38, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:09, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice portrait of a very difficult, restless subject. J e e 02:37, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:57, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Carabidae_.28Ground_Beetles.29

File:Yellow papillae flatworm (Thysanozoon nigropapillosum).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2015 at 17:35:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals
Info Rare capture of a yellow papillae flatworm (Thysanozoon nigropapillosum) swimming at 40 ft (12 m) depth, Manta Ray Bay, Yap, Federated States of Micronesia. Created, uploaded and nominated by Atsme (Betty Wills) -- 17:35, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atsme😊📞 17:35, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:47, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Small but the composition is lovely LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:11, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Curious and interesting animal (but I suggest a ccw rotation). 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:07, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful! --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:48, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Attractive and useful pic; however, too much unsharpness and CA for FP. Daniel Case (talk) 06:26, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Small resolution, unsharp. -- Pofka (talk) 13:13, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~{{o}}~~ Sorry but I think we need more details and sharpness even for underwater images --ArildV (talk) 21:37, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Curious - may I ask what details you expect from an underwater close-up shot of a 2 in. flatworm swimming? Atsme 📞 23:07, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - ~~Neutral~~ My big problem with the images is that he black part of the body is just black, no texture is visible. I don't have your experience in underwater photography, and maybe I'm asking for too much. But in order to vote support I have to answer the question why FP? Is the colors and the composition outstanding? I'm not sure. Is the quality outstanding? Not as far as I understand, but I could be wrong.--ArildV (talk) 01:05, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - Thank you for the response, ArildV, and for giving me the opportunity to explain. The black portion of the body is actually described in RS as a deep black dorsal surface with yellow-tipped papillae, the latter of which is the texture. Remember, it's only 1-1/2 in. to 2 in. long. The image is a perfect example of the species, not to mention a rare shot of it swimming in the water column. The bokeh effect draws your eye to the subject which is what it's supposed to do. Google images of a golden-tipped flatworm swimming and see what comes up. Try to imagine being 40 ft. deep with a 30 lb. tank strapped to your back, a mask on your face, a regulator in your mouth, fins on your feet, and there's a 1 to 2 knot current pushing at your back. Some photogs use reef hooks in such an environment, but I was untethered. The camera's inside a bulky u/w housing with a pair of long-armed strobes attached. The viz is a bit murky and the lighting sucks. You see a tiny little black object coming toward you. You don't know if it's debris or fish poop. You realize it's a critter, but when you try to approach, it swims away. You outmaneuver it because you sure as heck can't out-swim it. You need the strobes set at 5500k to replace the color spectrum that was lost at 33 ft. You're also dealing with light refraction in the water so you have to be at just the right distance from the subject. You don't get to take continuous shots for stacking, no bracketing, no dynamic ranging, no tripod, your f-stop is 3.8, ISO 50, speed 1/500 sec. You need to get close enough to light that little booger without backscatter or blowing out the whites, yet not so close that you lose what little depth of field you have to bring your subject into focus. It's tiny and its moving, and so are you. I got the shot complete with its small, ear-like pseudo tentacles (each about an 1/8 in) in the middle of the anterior end. 😊 Atsme 📞 04:16, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for the description Atsme, it is entertaining. ;o) Yann (talk) 08:36, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support for the topic. --Tremonist (talk) 14:16, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support--ArildV (talk) 14:34, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - This is one image with bokeh that doesn't bother me, and I understand the necessity of it. First of all, I think it's just a plain good photograph, and then added to that is the documentation aspect. We should feature this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:24, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:14, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals#Class_:_Turbellaria

File:Homme statue - 214.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2015 at 01:26:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Medium69 -- Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:26, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:26, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - this image drew me in as I was scrolling down the page. Atsme 📞 16:12, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support sorry for german but i can't write this in english. - Ich habe erstmal das Bild angesehen und mich gewundert, warum die Statue so echte Haare hat, erst dann habe ich begriffen, was das ist. Das Bild fesselt, es ist etwas Besonderes. --Ralf Roleček 23:11, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:09, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Reluctant oppose Right shoulder and the upper arm are too distracting. --Laitche (talk) 12:15, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:23, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 02:49, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Laitche. Daniel Case (talk) 03:56, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 22:56, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:00, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

File:Jänese raudteesild.JPG, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2015 at 19:54:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles
Info created and uploaded by Kruusamägi - nominated by Christian Ferrer --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:54, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:54, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:11, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:06, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 13:14, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 13:31, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow. QI for sure but too many elements in photo for it to have that certain simplicity. Daniel Case (talk) 19:26, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, not a bad images but not FP IMO for several reasons. I dont really like the low viewpoint here and the composition, the image has too much focus on the foreground (the train and the bridge is almost in the background). The colours doesn't help the train to stand out, everything has the same warm reddish colours and compete against each other.--ArildV (talk) 21:32, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 09:27, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:20, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 20:33, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:59, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles

File:Kristine kyrka, Falun (by Pudelek).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2015 at 16:58:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 16:58, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 16:58, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I like this picture. It feels very volumetric, helping me to imagine that I'm there. I find the composition good, and the picture is very clear. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:48, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

comment - I'm thinking a tighter crop at the right column would give it more depth and uniformity. Atsme😊📞 18:15, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:48, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:20, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 22:53, 8 December 2015 (UTC)I´m just reflecting, how I would enter this church, going foreward to have a look at the altar. I would go to the same position. Therefore it´s so realistic to me. I wouldn´t care about symetries and architectural principals. [reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:47, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Resolution could be higher but still FP-worthy IMO. --Code (talk) 06:20, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:22, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I guess I've been spoiled by all the other church interiors we've seen. The lack of symmetry here comes at the expense of any wow. Daniel Case (talk) 06:23, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Same as Daniel Case. -- Pofka (talk) 13:12, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:15, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:47, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:45, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I personally like the non-symmetric composition. --Ximonic (talk) 21:30, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:58, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

File:Locomotive TEM2M-063 2013 G1.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2015 at 18:15:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:15, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:15, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 18:29, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - The clouds really help the composition, which is very good. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:05, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:10, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 22:54, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:48, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:21, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment three times your name is a record. J. ;-) --Hubertl 15:35, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment No idea, how this occurred. Sorry. -- Johann Jaritz 15:43, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Support -- Pofka (talk) 13:13, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose So much done so well ... the color, the details, the perspective. But the gantries at the side is too much of a distraction. Daniel Case (talk) 19:24, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I was going to oppose but I change my mind, I like the image better everytime I watch it. --ArildV (talk) 21:35, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:16, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:55, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles

File:Porslinsfigurer. Årstiderna - Hallwylska museet - 87116.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2015 at 16:00:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info created by Francois Boucher / Hallwyl Museum, uploaded and nominated by Yann (talk) 16:00, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support This type of art was not well represented before the Hallwyl Museum provided this. High resolution, good quality. -- Yann (talk) 16:00, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:28, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice valued work --The Photographer (talk) 17:41, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:50, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support excellent work. --Hubertl 22:41, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful and crisp; again not the sort of thing we usually see here. Daniel Case (talk) 04:45, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:30, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:53, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:30, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:28, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 16:39, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charming. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:57, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 12:19, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:08, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 18:24, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hockei (talk) 19:50, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 21:32, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:01, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:Porto Covo June 2104-3a.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2015 at 18:14:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info Two chimneys in Porto Covo, Portygal. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:14, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:14, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love the simplicity of forms. It would make a great album cover. Daniel Case (talk) 06:11, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 09:20, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:29, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:32, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:54, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:39, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support One of these simply photos which has something in them.. -- Pofka (talk) 12:18, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:10, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love it! --El Grafo (talk) 13:11, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superb. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:01, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:54, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9332.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2015 at 12:54:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
Info Interior of the Jesuit Church in Vienna, west side, all by Hubertl -- Hubertl 12:54, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hubertl 12:54, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Nicely done. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:00, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 15:34, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Always room for one more well-done church interior. Daniel Case (talk) 16:33, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:52, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 19:10, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:11, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:36, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Delightful. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:50, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 12:08, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:23, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 21:33, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hockei (talk) 19:45, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:27, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:15, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings

File:A yoga namaste Hindu culture religion rites rituals sights.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2015 at 21:29:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info created by Michael Pravin on Flickr - uploaded by Yumiko86 - nominated by Pine -- Pine^✉ 21:29, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pine^✉ 21:29, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:18, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose For CA and exposition. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:20, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support --Tremonist (talk) 14:30, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose CA --Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:48, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per everyone else—ringing is especially bad. Daniel Case (talk) 06:38, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Moral support I like the composition, but quality issues. Yann (talk) 14:13, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 13:09, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ceiling of Sant'Antonio in Campo Marzio.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2015 at 22:13:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Info All by LivioAndronico ^(talk) 22:13, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LivioAndronico ^(talk) 22:13, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Are you sure about the colours and WB here? The images looks different compared to other interior photos from the church.--ArildV (talk) 22:28, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes sure, the only difference is the light.Thanks.--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 22:51, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is unlikely that the daylight (taken 11:57) have caused the very blue colours. Another view of the celling.--ArildV (talk) 23:22, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok,less blue LivioAndronico ^(talk) 23:44, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See answer on your talk page.--ArildV (talk) 00:24, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:17, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:20, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice framing. --Laitche (talk) 12:29, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:30, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:07, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I have to oppose the current version, wb and colours is wrong.--ArildV (talk) 20:15, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral, as ArildV. Hope, you can check it. --Hubertl 21:33, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:47, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:12, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Arild. Daniel Case (talk) 06:40, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Colors and white balance. Yann (talk) 08:43, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

new version ArildV,Hubertl,Yann e Daniel--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 23:02, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Certainly better. Yann (talk) 06:59, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 09:25, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:41, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:43, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:11, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

Info Demoted/Delisted to not featured per this consensus. --Cart (talk) 14:17, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gnesau Zedlitzdorf 34 ehem Kloster Karmeliterhospiz 09122015 9428.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2015 at 10:05:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
Info created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Johann Jaritz -- Johann Jaritz 10:05, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:05, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This would definitely be improved with a 16:9 crop to remove the bottom muddy grass. I'm not sure even then the composition is FP but will think on it. -- Colin (talk) 12:41, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:04, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak~~ support A crop might do, Colin's suggestion is really helpful I think. --Tremonist (talk) 14:36, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Done Thanks, Colin and Tremonist, for your very useful assessments. I cropped it according to your advices and wonder if the result will be more convenient for you than before. --Johann Jaritz 14:47, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support - That crop improved the composition to a surprising degree. I find this a clearly good composition now. I like its restful quality and the interplay between the grass and hay in the foreground, the cloudy sky in the background and the hill with evergreens on it, with the church and evergreens to its right in the middle. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:55, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Ikan, for your poetical comment. --Johann Jaritz 15:30, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Johann you should ping previous voters if you change the image this much. @Uoaei1 and Tremonist: -- Colin (talk) 15:40, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I still support after the change! --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:43, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I do so as well. It's much better now! Thank you, Johann, for your work, and thank you, Colin, for informing me! --Tremonist (talk) 15:58, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for not having pinged the mentioned users. ----Johann Jaritz 17:31, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Yes, far better with this crop! --Hubertl 15:10, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:43, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 21:55, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 20:05, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose The composition issues Colin notes, plus the overexposure of the house and the oversaturated sky above it. Daniel Case (talk) 03:27, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:53, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:37, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:55, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The perspective distortion is excessively corrected. The vertical lines (castle, trees) are not... vertical... Gzzz (talk) 21:49, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:13, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings

File:Heap of cans South Korea Pavilion Expo 2015.JPG, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2015 at 22:54:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Gzzz -- Gzzz (talk) 22:54, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gzzz (talk) 22:54, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 03:41, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow for me. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:33, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Strange topic, lots of shades of the silvery surface visible. --Tremonist (talk) 14:33, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 20:07, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love the unique texture ... Daniel Case (talk) 00:18, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose. Overall not so bad, but no wow for me. And what is educational value? -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:39, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It was a message of South Korea of the universal expo in Milan : it symbolizes unrestrained consumption... --Gzzz (talk) 11:26, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:39, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Brackenheim (talk) 13:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support a lot of canned nothing...--Hubertl 19:28, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:12, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:Mechanical-calculator-Brunsviga-800-02.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2015 at 14:30:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Brunsviga 800 mechanical calculator from 1952.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info A "Brunsviga 800" mechanical calculator. Produced by Brunsviga, Braunschweig in 1952. I removed the chassis to give an insight to the bewildering conglomerate of mechanical parts. Focus stack of 19 images an a three flash setup.

All by -- CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 14:30, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 14:30, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:10, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 17:40, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Supercrisp detail, attractively presented. Daniel Case (talk) 17:58, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice presentation. High educational value. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:21, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:47, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting subject, stunningly detailed and well captured. --Cayambe (talk) 09:29, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Cayambe and Frank S. Yann (talk) 14:07, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 16:13, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning quality and high educational value. --Code (talk) 19:16, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Remarkable image. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:53, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 12:17, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:11, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great shot and HEV. $Jacopo Werther iγ\partialψ=mψ$ 17:30, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:04, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:Melitaea trivia - Lesser Spotted Fritillary -2.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2015 at 12:41:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
Info Melitaea trivia fascelis (Lesser Spotted Fritillary) created and uploaded by Zcebeci - nominated by Christian Ferrer --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:41, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:41, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice, but the resolution is quite low for FPC --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:01, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support at most, resolution really could be higher, but the composition is nice. --Tremonist (talk) 14:38, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:25, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 20:32, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~{{o}} Nice picture, but not quite FP for me. 81.156.190.42 20:34, 10 December 2015 (UTC)~~[reply]
Support --Hubertl 21:30, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:46, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 21:55, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice picture, but not quite FP for me. Charles (talk) 22:16, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 15:48, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
weak oppose while this is a good photo it's not quite to FP standard due to focus issues, in my opinion. --Pine^✉ 17:10, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support The butterfly is in focus, and that to me is what matters in this image. Daniel Case (talk) 06:13, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald 23:40, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:26, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 08:21, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:14, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera

File:Seitenraum der Ruhmeshalle, Heeresgeschichtliches Museum, Wien 0362 3 4 5 6.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2015 at 02:11:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Info all by Hubertl -- Hubertl 02:11, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info Side tract of the hall of fame, Museum for military history, Vienna
Support -- Hubertl 02:11, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:25, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Good job! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:16, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:00, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support very good! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:02, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow, this is an amazing shot. Congratulations! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 07:23, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 08:54, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Strongly distorted foreground columns are too distracting to me, sorry. --Ivar (talk) 09:21, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure that these columns are round. To confirm. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:30, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:30, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Ivar. The distorted columns are too dominant to ignore. Medium69, see this image for comparison. Also not convinced about colour balance. -- Colin (talk) 12:46, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:03, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good picture of a very interesting room! Definitely FP for me. Not sure whether the category above is correct, this doesn't seem to be a "Reliogious building". --Code (talk) 14:33, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:34, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:36, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose For Ivar --Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:45, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment While I don't mind the perspective distortion, there seems to be a slight amount of pincushion distortion or something which should be corrected first. The left pillar is bending outwards, and the other pillars and walls seem to be subtly curved as well. You can also see evidence of pincushion distortion by comparing the horizontal lines on the ground against a grid. dllu (t,c) 03:15, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Done - I´ve corrected the distortion, dllu. I know now, why I´ve got this. A slight mistake, actually an omission at the very beginning within the pretty complex workflow. Please purge the page, if you don´t see it. --Hubertl 11:30, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Looks okay now. Shooting 11mm on a full frame sensor is quite interesting. dllu (t,c) 11:38, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks, dllu, in fact, it´s not so easy. Needs practice. --Hubertl 13:08, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 15:48, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 20:07, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ivar. Daniel Case (talk) 03:19, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:42, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Brackenheim (talk) 13:23, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The foreground columns are clearly distorted, as are the side doors and walls. Furthermore, the upper part of the right column doesn't look sharp... Gzzz (talk) 21:45, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:13, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

File:Strandkorb bei Sonnenaufgang.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2015 at 08:18:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info I thought it was time for a little warm summer memory. I know that this nomination might be controversial, but before calling it "yet another fucking sunset" please consider the following: This picture wasn't taken during sunset, but at sunrise. It's not a picture of a sunset or sunrise, but of a beach chair. Resolution and quality are quite high IMO. Some might say it's kitsch which might be true. But that's a matter of taste. And finally I had to wake up at 4 am to walk to the beach and take this picture. I'll be happy for any comment. All by me. -- Code (talk) 08:18, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Code (talk) 08:18, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice. Good lights, Good composition. --XRay ^talk 09:19, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:28, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per XRay -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:40, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:32, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great composition. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:33, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 13:06, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great colors. Daniel Case (talk) 14:53, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:37, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald 23:41, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support great picture, well done --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:34, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 09:10, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:45, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support No complaints. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:55, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 12:18, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:10, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:05, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:VL19 Zlatoust.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2015 at 22:24:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles
Info VL19 locomotive (monunent in Zlatoust). Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Роман Дергунов (talk) 22:24, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Роман Дергунов (talk) 22:24, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 03:42, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 04:54, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for some reasons. This locomotive isn't used, it is an exhibit or long-time storage. So, you can choose a best time for new shot. Boring lighting, not presentable background. The church at right is strongly distorted. Overall like a random tourist snapshot, sorry. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:50, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per George. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:22, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Looks nice, but improvements are possible, I agree. --Tremonist (talk) 14:32, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The contact shoe (part of the pantograph) is missing and the windows have obviously been "fixed" with sheets of metal or the like. I'm thus not a big fan of the subject, the picture does not illustrate this type of locomotive well. --Kabelleger (talk) 19:40, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per George. Yann (talk) 22:29, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per George. Daniel Case (talk) 18:19, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 13:10, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:San Cristóbal de La Laguna.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2015 at 19:24:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info all by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald 19:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald 19:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 19:56, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- KTC (talk) 21:57, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - impressive! Óðinn (talk) 22:02, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Very strong support Definite WOW ... my kind of FP. Daniel Case (talk) 22:32, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I can't view this picture above the thumbnail size, because when I try, I get the message that it has errors. Is there a way you can set up a zoom feature for the thumbnail? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:57, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Most browsers have problems with images above 100 Megapixels. Nevertheless there are some opportunities, to view these images in high resolution. Opportunity 1: You can download the file (right click on the 800px preview and "save target/link as"). Opportunity 2: You can click on the resolution links below the 800px preview (but not the full resolution link!) und then p.e. you will reach the URL https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3c/San_Crist%C3%B3bal_de_La_Laguna.jpg/1280px-San_Crist%C3%B3bal_de_La_Laguna.jpg Now you can replace the parameter "1280px" with a higher value, p.e. "5000px" (maximum is about "7000px", above: server error). Your third opportunity is to use the interactive large-image-viewer linked above the description (red box). I hope I could help... :-) -- Wolf im Wald 15:28, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. The view at the link was big enough for me to judge the photo better, and I'm happy to

Support featuring it, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:26, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 23:13, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 00:16, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:38, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The left part is clearly leaning out. --Code (talk) 09:42, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think this is perspective distortion because the photo was taken downward. The vertical lines on the right are also leaning out to the other side. Besides the terrain is sloping. Wolf im Wald 15:28, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:47, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 12:08, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:25, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:14, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Neutral~~ Very nice, but per Code. --Ivar (talk) 18:32, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Iifar: @Code: I uploaded an new version with perspective correction and little different crop. -- Wolf im Wald 02:59, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support now --Ivar (talk) 06:17, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Hockei (talk) 19:44, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is a pity that the highlights on the buildings are blown out but the view is remarkable indeed. dllu (t,c) 00:39, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support A bit brighter than I would prefer, but the landscape in the background is spectacular. — Julian H.^✈ 13:44, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:05, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Bryce Canyon Hoodoos Amphitheater 2.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2015 at 21:38:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info created and uploaded by Digon3 - nominated by Σπάρτακος -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:38, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:38, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Pretty soft at the whole right border. Slightly over-exposed too for my taste. Sting (talk) 22:57, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support It's pretty, but we know so many photos of this great place that we maybe tend to expect too much... --Tremonist (talk) 13:52, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose We have many great FP-s from that place. Including ones that are more interesting or with superior quality. It doesn't stand out enough for me compared to many other images. Kruusamägi (talk) 15:05, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Seems that we even have a better image from that same place from that same user. Kruusamägi (talk) 15:09, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes, I see. Thank you, Kruusamägi. Remarkable. --Tremonist (talk) 16:09, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose As others already mentioned: better variants are available. -- Pofka (talk) 15:47, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. Daniel Case (talk) 06:19, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. IMO this one is better, and a FP. —Bruce1ee^talk 10:34, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 11:33, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plaza Mayor de Salamanca después de la lluvia.JPG, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2015 at 21:35:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: [[Commons:Featured pictures/<add the category here>]]
Info created by Kiko León - uploaded by Kiko León - nominated by Kiko León -- chosovi (talk) 21:35, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- chosovi (talk) 21:35, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Those tables... -- KTC (talk) 21:53, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per KTC. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:48, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose tables + too dark. -- Pofka (talk) 12:00, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Tremonist (talk) 13:31, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose While I think it might work at this level of light, there is serious CA. Daniel Case (talk) 15:12, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 11:32, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Church of Saint Thomas More.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2015 at 06:54:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
Info All by LivioAndronico ^(talk) 06:54, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LivioAndronico ^(talk) 06:54, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question - That's an excellent photo that I would vote to support, but I'd like to know how the church's facade is so bright. Are there bright lights some ways back on the right and left sides that are also lighting the fence? If so, how do they avoid shadows on the facade? Sorry if this is an ignorant question. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:10, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure Ikan Kekek there are lights that avoid shadows on the facade. Asking is always lawful, answering is good manners. And anyway: if people did not questions, we would never answers (Nicola Tesla). Thanks LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:07, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. And Support. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:57, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Yann (talk) 08:52, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 09:24, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:02, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:29, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral It looks spectacular, but IMO it does not reflect the real lightening conditions. This happens often with a one long exposure single shot. But I understand, why others like it. See i.e. the color of the lawn on the left side. --Hubertl 11:57, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What are you seeing that I'm not noticing? The lawn on the left side looks bright green to me, which would seem to me to reflect its being shined upon by bright lights. Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:24, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:39, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unless this church is lit up like a film set at night, I suggest this is quite unrealistically over-exposed. Educational purpose is compromised. Also, please properly categorise your images before nominating at FP. Category:Church of Saint Thomas More is an orphan and there is no descriptive location information in the file page (just a geocode). -- Colin (talk) 08:58, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per Hubertl. Daniel Case (talk) 15:41, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Colin and Hubertl about the lighting. The technical quality is okay, but not excellent for an architectural photo such as this. The photo has noise in the sky, and is not very sharp -- probably there was some vibration in the tripod during the 30 second exposure (the star trail in the middle top is further evidence of camera shake). The picture is noticeably over-sharpened: see the black edges around the bright tree leaves on the left and the white halos around dark buildings and trees in the background. There are some ways that the composition can be improved too. For example, the green railing on the bottom left should not be part of the frame. dllu (t,c) 00:40, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 17:36, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings

File:Iglesia de San Salvador, Torla, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 02.JPG, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2015 at 09:19:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
Info Church of San Salvador in Torla, province of Huesca, Aragón, Spain. The church, of late gothic style but with a romanesque portal, dates from the 16th century. In the background are the mountain of Ordesa y Monte Perdido National Park. All by me, Poc o² 09:19, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 09:19, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:00, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:48, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 12:00, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:45, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 14:08, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Óðinn (talk) 16:29, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - That's a really great picture, not only worthy of being featured but at a really high level for a featured picture. This really has a "wow" factor! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:22, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Splendidly composed and shot. Daniel Case (talk) 17:22, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:01, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 19:11, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 21:23, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:28, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 07:20, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 21:31, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:43, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:02, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 13:31, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 17:34, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings

File:Translohr STE4 - 143.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2015 at 11:13:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Medium69 -- Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:13, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:13, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral for now. I like this picture, but because of a slightly perspective distortion the tram itself seems leanining to the right. Try to fix it. --Hubertl 11:53, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done I did the best I could to correct this. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:50, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment While the composition is ok and the street car's colour is nice, most of the photo, background and surrounding areas mostly, appears rather unsharp. Do I see this correctly? --Tremonist (talk) 13:58, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, but I deliberately wanted to focus on the front of the tram. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:12, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I understand... --Tremonist (talk) 15:49, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:54, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support yes, it´s more compact now, it relates good to the bully form of the tram. --Hubertl 14:05, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support This looks like a picture that a tram manufacturer would release as promotional material. Everything is quite clean and good-looking. dllu (t,c) 20:14, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 20:53, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support A woman driving… 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:58, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@ArionEstar: Sorry, I know neither his name nor his phone ^^ --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:58, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:15, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow for me; background too busy. Daniel Case (talk) 15:44, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:48, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:52, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:22, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 17:35, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles

File:University of North Texas September 2015 40 (pedestrian bridge).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2015 at 12:36:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges
Info created and uploaded by Michael Barera - nominated by Ivar (talk) 12:36, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 12:36, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the graphical effect. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 13:30, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Johann. --Tremonist (talk) 13:47, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:54, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 14:06, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I gladly Support this picture. I recently added a thumbnail of it to Wikivoyage:Denton, mainly because of its artistry. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:15, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Aaaaand seven. A bit of purple fringing on the screening at the very sides, but that's a small part of this and doesn't take away from the arresting vanishing-point perspective here. Daniel Case (talk) 18:48, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 21:21, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:28, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 07:18, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support INeverCry 00:20, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 11:29, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 13:30, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 08:27, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 17:33, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges

File:Bathwick Hill, Bath, Somerset, UK - Diliff.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2015 at 14:52:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Diliff -- Diliff (talk) 14:52, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Diliff (talk) 14:52, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support So very typical! --Tremonist (talk) 15:38, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Tremonist. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 16:04, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - That's a really great composition. Just beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:09, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 19:12, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per others. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:42, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support The so-English-you-can-taste-the-fish-and-chips streetscape I was striving for with all those pictures I took in Macclesfield before Wikimania 2014. but never quite got (as much because it wasn't the thing that drew me there as anything to do with the town itself). So good is it I can overlook the slightly unnatural blue of the sky at top (one could, after all, argue that blue skies by themselves are unnatural in England, but whatever ... ), probably a result of some effort to suppress highlights. Daniel Case (talk) 22:56, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, the sky does look a bit funny and it could be somewhat the result of highlights adjustments, but I think there was a bit of hazy blue sky peeking through the clouds. ;-) I'm glad you like the image - it is indeed a quintessential British cityscape, and Bath is one of the most architecturally homogenous cities in the UK, however, most sweeping views tend to be from high vantage points that don't really give you the sense of being there (like this one of mine). This nominated image has the advantage of offering an intimate street scene as well a broader view of it as an aesthetic, homogenous whole. Anyway, that's what I thought was special about it when nominating it. Diliff (talk) 16:06, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:29, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 07:17, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Óðinn (talk) 17:54, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hockei (talk) 19:39, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 21:26, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:46, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 08:01, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support INeverCry 00:03, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow. -- Pofka (talk) 11:28, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 13:28, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 02:43, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes

File:Castelo Novo April 2015-2a.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2015 at 14:37:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info Minimalism again. Traditional window in the village of Castelo Novo, Serra da Gardunha, Portugal. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:37, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:37, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Music for 18 Musicians. Not less, as Steve Reich would say.. --Hubertl 14:56, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice colours, good composition. --Tremonist (talk) 15:36, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Tremonist. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 16:02, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support There is no better picture we have that conveys the idea of what sash windows are all about. This would be the ultimate Windows desktop image . Daniel Case (talk) 19:40, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:28, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support dllu (t,c) 06:31, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 07:17, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this simplicity. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:29, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 11:28, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 02:44, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:Església Santa Margalida - Santa Margalida - Mallorca - Stained glass windows.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2015 at 17:29:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 17:29, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 17:29, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:47, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 21:30, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:29, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Conditional~~ Support on a robust effort made to clean up the CA on some of the window muntins. Daniel Case (talk) 05:04, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Done --Llez (talk) 20:01, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:05, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:13, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 20:22, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:05, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:47, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:28, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 17:21, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support INeverCry 00:01, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 11:24, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 02:42, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:Perseiid.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2015 at 14:07:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy
Info created and uploaded by Martin Mark - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 14:07, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 14:07, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mystical. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:28, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Johann. --Tremonist (talk) 15:35, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Óðinn (talk) 16:28, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - As Johann said. That's really poetic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:12, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Grain and noise perfectly forgivable in this kind of astronomical-twilight long exposure. Had to remember to look at it directly—since my desktop monitor is inclined upwards so I can work at it without crouching down, it looks too dark on first glance. Daniel Case (talk) 19:28, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:28, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 07:18, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I cannot decide, because I have no experience at all, making pictures like this. I understand the acceptance of the extreme perspective distortion, in favor not loosing the panoramic wideness. I´m not sure if it would better with more distance to the tree so this distortion could be repaired easily. Also the problem with the color noise. Using ISO 1.600 will unavoidably produce this noise, one minute exposure will produce a different sight of the stars. Probably with a worse result. What does a fotographer need to make it better? A Sony A7 S? --Hubertl 11:50, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 20:20, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:45, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Moderated support Per Hubert|. I still think the noise can be reduced. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:38, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It would be great if the noise could be reduced. Is that in fact possible? Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:51, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

At least the color noise I think so. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:30, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support INeverCry 00:06, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 11:28, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 02:44, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy

File:Buckow Maerkische Schweiz 08-2015 img5.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2015 at 23:28:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created , uploaded, and nominated by A.Savin --A.Savin 23:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 23:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 23:53, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 01:18, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice view of a wetland habitat. J e e 03:03, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice! -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:30, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - That's a nice artistic picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:34, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Ikan. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:05, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 09:23, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:15, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:23, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:46, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:00, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A well-done nature photo and QI for sure but I'm just not wowed enough to support it as an FP. Daniel Case (talk) 22:19, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as Daniel. good work, but nothing outstanding. --Hubertl 22:46, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:30, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice atmosphere--Christof46 (talk) 09:47, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:31, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald 23:22, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Daniel.--Kikos (talk) 07:36, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Definitely has wow, especially due to that pleasant fog over the lake. -- Pofka (talk) 12:25, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:56, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ivar (talk) 08:21, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Cast victim eruptions Pompeii.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2015 at 18:46:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info all by me -- Jebulon (talk) 18:46, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination--Jebulon (talk) 11:21, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive and moving close-up view of a cast of a victim of the Eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79 in Pompeii, Italy.-- Jebulon (talk) 18:46, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I'm sorry. I like the subject matter, but the whole photo is fuzzy except for part of the head. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:52, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:12, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 03:29, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ikan. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 06:43, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I withdraw my nomination The level of reviews here is as low as the level of most of the pictures. My mistake to come back, sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 11:21, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment - Nice. I notice you didn't attempt to address my point, but instead slammed the entire site ad hominem. I don't claim to be a great photographer, though there certainly are some great ones on this site. I simply express my opinion based on what I see. And if you think the photos here are so bad, why did you want yours featured here? Feature it on another site whose photos you like better, or on your own. Good luck, and goodbye. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:27, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - Comment Do not worry Ikan Kekek, it's normal here to cry and hurt when their photos are shaped correctly as this.LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:44, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      - Comment - It shouldn't be normal, in my opinion, and I find it anti-Wiki. I'm an admin on another Wiki site that doesn't have (or no longer has) a habit of tolerating high levels of invective between users. We found that tolerating a high level of anti-social behavior was chasing away some really valuable contributors. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:51, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't need patronizing lessons about what is "pro" or "anti-Wiki" here. And I don't "cry", I just withdraw. A picture can be bad, and reviews too. I experience that here for a while. Those who find that other wiki sites are better are welcome for a "good luck" and "good bye" too...--Jebulon (talk) 22:14, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You were the one who said you were leaving, but I see you're still here... Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:09, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

not as nominator, only as reviewer.--Jebulon (talk) 12:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ivar (talk) 08:17, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iglesia de Santo Domingo, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 205-207 HDR.JPG, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2015 at 17:44:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info Chapel of Our Lady of the Rosary, Church of St Domingo, Quito, Ecuador. A group of Dominicans began the construction of the baroque temple in 1540 but it wasn't completely finished until 1688. Poc o² 17:44, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 17:44, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose not sure about the uncorrected perspective (though it might work in this case)... But the image definitely needs a ccw rotation. Impressive colors anyway! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:08, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Martin Falbisoner: You oppose due to a tilt? To be honest, I am not sure about that. The place is really old and not symmetrical. If I rotate in one direction some elements look strange, and the same happens in the other direction Poc o² 23:51, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Give it a try: A rotation of -1,00 degree will improve the image a lot --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:35, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:28, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't like the pronounced tilt here. There's loads of church interior FPs and noms, so they should be really special to pass if you ask me. INeverCry 03:50, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm sorry, but heavy distortion is really distracting. --Ivar (talk) 06:19, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Interesting place but the perspective is not really pleasing, so basically per Ivar. The tilt noted by Martin Falbisoner is very distracting, too. --Code (talk) 07:53, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment sorry but I have to agree with Martin, the tilt is disturbing.--ArildV (talk) 10:40, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Poc o² 11:22, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ivar (talk) 13:46, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Poertschach Hauptstrasse Edelweissbad Badesteg 18112015 9079.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2015 at 06:24:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Johann Jaritz 06:24, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:24, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Nice but the right side isn't real sharp LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:18, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unsharp.--Jebulon (

talk) 11:24, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per Jebulon. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:20, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support For me personally it´s like this I´m biased. --Hubertl 12:50, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination I neglected to check the sharpness before nominating that image. Sorry!.--Johann Jaritz (talk) 13:47, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ivar (talk) 08:17, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:San Carlo al Corso (Rome) HDR.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2015 at 08:13:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
I withdraw my nomination All by LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:13, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:13, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Until clearing: I´m sorry, but IMO, the colors are wrong. Something happens during the session (wrong white balance IMO). You lost all the red tones. See here. It doesn´t mean, that Ron Reznik is completely right, but there is a tendency, which supports my estimation. Exept this color issue, the technical quality is almost superb. --Hubertl 09:03, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done See now Hubertl,thanx LivioAndronico ^(talk) 09:21, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

* Weak support Colors are better now. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:59, 20 December 2015 (UTC)Invalid vote, because of use of an invalide template (see guidelines).--Jebulon (talk) 16:25, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:21, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- Something went very wrong with colours or white balance. Please check this one and this one, with the same subject. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:39, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 15:40, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Wrong colors. I cannot open the file at full size.--Jebulon (talk) 16:24, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Per the color situation. Daniel Case (talk) 16:34, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't know if the colours are accurate or not, I wasn't there. But it's definitely oversharpened, and that also reduces the saturation in some areas. This is FP material, but the processing is not quite there. — Julian H.^✈ 17:38, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /Ivar (talk) 08:16, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:BEN Bengalian kitten (4492540155).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2015 at 12:50:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Info created by Nickolas Titkov, uploaded by INeverCry, edited and nominated by Yann (talk) 12:50, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality and composition, nice expression. -- Yann (talk) 12:50, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ -- 72.89.121.157 16:39, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, but you need to log in to vote. Yann (talk) 18:34, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - I think that was me. I have no idea how I got logged out. ~~Anyway, Support.~~ Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:29, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - I have to admit the opponents have a point on focus. I expect this photo to be featured, and I'm fine with that, but I think I'm more nearly Neutral now. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:01, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:51, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I was surprised we didn't have any cat FPs ... on the 21st century Internet, that is inexcusable. Daniel Case (

talk) 04:44, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:30, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:28, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Valuable portrait. --A.Savin 16:04, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nothing outstanding on this photo, seems to be just a snapshot, the background don't add to the photo, focus just in the first eye; this is a very standard photo. -- RTA 09:48, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Focus issues. -- Pofka (talk) 12:22, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. --Tremonist (talk) 13:08, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Daniel Case. I love cats! --Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:17, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Natuur12 (talk) 20:52, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think it's a great image too. We need more cat FPs, and I need a userbox that says I've uploaded a featured picture... INeverCry 20:57, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 08:20, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per RTA --Pudelek (talk) 11:01, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't want to promote an (mostly) unsharp normal kitten--Jebulon (talk) 16:34, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Such "normal" kitten costs $2.000 or more (just FYI) --A.Savin 16:45, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Agree with RTA, just a snapshot with flash light and posterized background... --Laitche (talk) 10:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:19, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals

File:Chaenomeles x superba 'nicolina' (chinese kwee). Locatie. Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei 02.JPG, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2015 at 06:17:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants #Family Rosaceae.
Info Fruit of Chaenomeles x superba 'nicolina' (Chinese quince). Location. garden sanctuary JonkerValley. created by Famberhorst - uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Famberhorst -- Famberhorst (talk) 06:17, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 06:17, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:04, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:12, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I certainly won't stand in this photo's way, as it's a very good fruit photo. I may be unique in finding the background, which is so blurred as to be unidentifiable except by inference as, presumably, the rest of the tree, to be distracting, but I suppose if the fruits are in perfect focus, that kind of thing will happen. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:30, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek: It's intentional in this sort of macro image—see bokeh. Daniel Case (talk) 03:17, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Daniel. I guess, to my taste, this is somewhat unpleasant or at least slightly distracting bokeh. However, as I said, I won't stand in the way of this photo being featured. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:48, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:51, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support As Ikan says, perfect detail on the fruit. Daniel Case (talk) 03:17, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose There's no "wow" to this picture. While it is encyclopedic and reasonably well executed, the plant is not interesting to look at. The upper fruit is not in perfect focus, and I'm not a huge fan of the background with a distracting spot on the bottom left for example. dllu (t,c) 07:12, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done spot removed.--Famberhorst (talk) 08:43, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:32, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support as others.--Hubertl 13:16, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 12:23, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per dllu. Also, I don't really dig the lighting (my guts keep telling me that the whole image is rotated 90° clock-wise) and agree with Ikan Kekek when it comes to bokeh (To me it looks like medium length lawn in the background, which makes me think of a garden, which in turn is like a zoo for plants: unnatural. I know, I know, it's a cultivar, so the environment makes sense – but I'm talking about aesthetics here). --El Grafo (talk) 12:39, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:06, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 08:21, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:19, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants

File:Lauderdale Tower, Barbican Estate, London.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2015 at 06:39:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#United Kingdom
Info created by Daniel Case - uploaded by Daniel Case - nominated by Daniel Case -- Daniel Case (talk) 06:39, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment My last nomination from Wikimania 2014. If you were there and came to the venue via the Barbican tube station, you doubtless remember this as basically the first thing you saw when you reached the street. It looked lovely in the light of the afternoon turning into evening. Daniel Case (talk) 06:40, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Daniel Case (talk) 06:39, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bombastic skyscraper. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:00, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:38, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:41, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Johann Jaritz --Cayambe (talk) 17:00, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 19:38, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support "Para o alto e avante!" 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:16, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 05:05, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - At first, I didn't love the composition, but the more I look at it, the more I appreciate the pure up and down movement between the right, left and center. It's not my favorite kind of building, but it's a good representation of it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:06, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment is not Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers better? --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:25, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Christian Ferrer: Thanks ... I hadn't realized we had a subcat for towers. Daniel Case (talk) 06:36, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Impressive. The light blue sky and scattered clouds fit well as a background for this building's light color. The weathering marks on the edges of each floor at center adds an extra little something to the image for me. INeverCry 23:51, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 11:23, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support now I realized, why I hesitated so long: Round the corner, there I had my first and probably the last wikimania attendance. --Hubertl 00:04, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Óðinn (talk) 16:16, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:19, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:17, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers#United Kingdom

File:Lepitopteroloog.JPG, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2015 at 17:22:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info created and uploaded by Lennart Lennuk - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 17:22, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 17:22, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question - Help us (or me, anyway) with this, please. Most of the picture is blurry. Why is this a good Featured picture candidate? I understand having a singular focus on a small insect, with the rest of the picture blurred, but surely, that isn't essential for photos of people, right? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:28, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I consider this a good environmental photo, that shows scientist in action (read: lepidopterist in his natural habitat). Quality of the image is definitely good and it has a fine size. Composition is good. It is certainly interesting and (at least for me) it clearly has wow. Focus is set to the person (i.e. the subject is in focus). I see no reason for everything else to be sharp as well as it would not help the man to stand out that easily and would not give anything new to the image. We could argue, that the image/main subject might be do dark due to the late hour when it was taken (likely at sunset), but for me this could be the only reason not to select it to be FB. But then again, this is just my opinion and everyone is entitled to his or her own. Kruusamägi (talk) 04:36, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - Your reply is much appreciated, and I thought long and hard but have decided to oppose featuring this. I understand that deliberate blurring is appreciated by many photographers and viewers, and I'm often holding back on voting against pictures with bokeh that bugs me but doesn't make me physically dizzy, but I just don't get a "wow" from this photo. Sorry. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:43, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per Ikan. The image is not clear enough to me at first glance due to all the different elements vying for my attention. And I can't tell it's someone with a net at first. When there's this level of confusion, I'm not wowed. Daniel Case (talk) 06:08, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:29, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too noisy. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:32, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 12:14, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support A little bit of lightening might help though. -- Pofka (talk) 12:21, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support --Tremonist (talk) 13:09, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:41, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good example of bokeh and DoF but not enough detailed for FP and a bit too noisy. --Laitche (talk) 10:20, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 21:10, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schlossplatzspringbrunnen Schlossplatz Stuttgart 2015 03.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2015 at 09:10:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info c/u/n by me. Full disclosure: It's quite similar to that photo. People have indicated that they like this one in particular though, hence the nomination. — Julian H.^✈ 09:10, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 09:10, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting light and colours. --Tremonist (talk) 13:46, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 15:41, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Given all the things that could have gone wrong with an image lit like this, both in the camera and afterwards, this has turned out extremely well. No reason we can't feature both images of this fountain. Daniel Case (talk) 17:08, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - What does c/u/n mean? Anyway, painting or photographing the same landscape or cityscape in different light conditions is a time-honored procedure (Monet's paintings of the Rouen Cathedral being one famous example). Both shots are excellent, it's a beautiful location, and I really like the sense of depth and airiness in both. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:13, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{created, uploaded, nominated) Atsme 📞 19:54, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Good time. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:36, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:04, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment how many others nominations [5] with this fountain? Dou you have also one in the morning light? LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:48, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please read, what Julian has written above. --Hubertl 22:58, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:57, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Pudelek (talk) 12:07, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 12:26, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:21, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 11:17, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 08:05, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support For light! --Laitche (talk) 10:56, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:17, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Stenhamra September 2014 01.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2015 at 11:48:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info Typical prefabricated homes from the 1970s in Stenhamra, Stockholm county. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 11:48, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 11:48, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 22:43, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I can see what you were trying to get, but it didn't quite come through. The pattern of the neighborhood lots and houses doesn't come across as striking enough at this angle, and with the other places at the side. Plus the bottom is a little noisy. Daniel Case (talk) 03:23, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:29, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Please pardon me for being blunt, but this seems more a useful encyclopedic picture (ergo, Valued) than a truly artistic picture to me. I see the relative sameness of the houses, but I'm having trouble with the composition (for example, it is not rewarding for me to move my eye around the picture frame, nor is there a perfect rectangular shape for the picture frame, streets and houses, if you were going for that). Is there a particular compositional idea you had in mind? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:08, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Thank you for your comment Ikan Kekek. Sorry for late replay, I have been very busy offline. I think the photo is interesting, but I understand Daniel's opinion above. The photo is about this residential area from 1970 composed of two types of houses. It's also telling the story about how every house (once identical) has changed during 40 years. The photo is taken from a helicopter, with limited opportunity to compose the image or change lens (dangerous when flying with doors removed). Also for aerial photography you always have to crop some building and you very rarely get the perfect frame. But I don't think the composition is to bad, it is a straight street at the bottom, right angles to the houses. Artistic? I don't know. But most FP, unfortunately IMO, are just QI of nice places and locations Imo FP is and should be about featured pictures, not featured buildings or locations. I think this photo is a interesting images telling a interesting story in a unusual but effective way. But I understand if you disagree. Regards--ArildV (talk) 14:48, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment Thanks a lot for your reply, and I totally get all your points and respect them. They definitely explain why the photo is interesting, but not necessarily, to my mind, why it should be featured. I guess the question in my mind amounts to documentation vs. artistry. I certainly won't be upset if it's featured, but I'm kind of agnostic, and I'll be Neutral on this nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:05, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per others. --Tremonist (talk) 13:07, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 21:10, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:15-07-21-Flug-MEX-CDG-RalfR-N3S 9821.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2015 at 19:54:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info Wing of a Boeing 787 Dreamliner in Flight, on the horizon Greenland - all of Ralf Roleček
Support -- Ralf Roleček 19:54, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Clouds at bottom are too distracting. Daniel Case (talk) 22:33, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support dllu (t,c) 07:38, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:46, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Looks like a usual flight photo. I'm unable to find anything unique or exclusive here. Sorry. -- Pofka (talk) 12:06, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support because of the colours. --Tremonist (talk) 13:26, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 13:54, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This image is remarkably unremarkable, there's _nothing_ special about it. KennyOMG (talk) 18:13, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think I'm going to Oppose this, too. So, it's a clear picture of a plane's wing. That should merit a Valued image classification, or maybe Quality (which it has). Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see anything unusually special or beautiful about this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:12, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow factor at all. I just transferred 4000 aerial images from Flickr a couple weeks ago, and a couple hundred of them show wings like this. I've actually been trying to crop them out when I can. INeverCry 00:28, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Ralf Roleček 23:17, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ivar (talk) 11:34, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Massif des Bornes - 216.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2015 at 01:31:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Medium69 -- Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:31, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:31, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:50, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The sky and the mountain at right are so hazy it almost looks like smog or smoke. The composition is nice though. INeverCry 03:40, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the composition is ok, but not a good time (noon, in July). Hazy and not very nice lighting imo.--ArildV (talk) 09:56, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others: too hazy. -- Pofka (talk) 19:26, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Haze not so much a problem; this is unavoidable and judging by the previous uploads there was a serious effort to clean it up. However, that same effort may have left too much of the picture unsharp. Daniel Case (talk) 21:09, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the comments. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:47, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Ivar (talk) 07:12, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Basilique de la Visitation - 207.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2015 at 13:11:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Medium69 -- Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:11, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:11, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cross at top unsharp, tight crop below. The attempt of "special" light is not a success IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 16:16, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I also think that the backlight doesn't quite work here, sorry. It's not bad, but it's not great light either. — Julian H.^✈ 18:26, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 19:15, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thank you for your comments. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:30, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ivar (talk) 08:15, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wikipedia 5 million articles milestone video November 2015.ogv, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2015 at 19:57:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animated
Info created by Pine - uploaded by Pine - nominated by Pine -- Pine^✉ 19:57, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pine^✉ 19:57, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done, love the grid dissolves, wish I'd been able to make the group photo at Wikimania 2014 so I could have seen myself in this (at 1:30 or so). There's a credit for the music, right? Daniel Case (talk) 06:32, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Yes, well-done and still timely, but as a musician, I believe the composer of the music should be clearly identified in the credits in the video itself and don't feel right supporting this until that issue is addressed. I'm glad you pointed to that, Daniel. Was the composer identified in some small print I didn't see because there was writing all over the screen at that point? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:54, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I do not feel qualified to judge a video. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:26, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Daniel. --Tremonist (talk) 13:39, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Music loop is too short, powerpoint efect to slide pages, little information, no responsive design, fonts are not respected and in some cases impossible to read. Video and high-quality images, however, lack of concurrent design and way of representing it. Too many distractions in the background difficult to read the text. I'm sorry --The Photographer (talk) 16:11, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Very good points, especially about the text, but I agree on the music loop, too. Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:00, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- About the text, are you watching the video at 1080p? If you simply fullscreen the image on Commons, the video plays at 480p, which is less than optimal for reading the text. --Pine^✉ 20:30, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - How do you expect most people to view the video? Thanks for your response about the music credits. I'm undecided about the video now, though, because I think the criticisms are meritorious but there are also obvious good things about the video. Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:45, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek: It is indeed unfortunate that MediaWiki's handling of video is so clumsy, and I believe that WMF is working to improve it. In the meantime I suggest using VLC media player, or you can manually change the quality of the video using the settings in the bottom right corner of the fullscreen video when you play it on Commons. (: --Pine^✉ 23:35, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case: @Ikan Kekek: The music is identified in the credits. It is "Namaste" by Jason Shaw, and is licensed CC-BY 3.0. I found it here at freemusicarchive.org. --Pine^✉ 20:31, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good. I figured it was credited. One of the tricky things about video is that we have to be careful about copyright in the sounds as well as the image. Daniel Case (talk) 01:30, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination due to a copy-editing error being spotted. I'll need to re-render the video to fix it, and it may be quite awhile before I have the time to do that. --Pine^✉ 19:11, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /Ivar (talk) 08:19, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arundo donax, Salagou Lake, Liausson 01.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2015 at 14:35:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
Info Arundo donax (Giant canes). All by Christian Ferrer -- --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:35, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:35, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose From technical point of view the cane was taken, IMO, ideally, but the trees in the background aren't a good idea at all: it is difficult to recognize the “border” between the cane and the trees. Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 15:45, 19 December 2015 (UTC).[reply]
Weak oppose I agree ; the tree is troublesome in this photo. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:11, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose In addition to above-noted issue, there is no wow in the composition for me. Daniel Case (talk) 03:28, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Daniel. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:45, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:02, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ivar (talk) 08:18, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Royal Life Guards (Den Kongelige Livgarde), Copenhagen 04.JPG, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2015 at 13:59:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info all - nominated by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 13:59, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 13:59, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I like the monumentality of this picture and the interplay of the different lines and planes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:08, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Maybe it's the angle, maybe it's the inclusion of the second story, but I just don't feel the wow. QI for sure, though. Daniel Case (talk) 21:33, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Per Daniel. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:14, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support partly per Ikan and per Daniel. --Tremonist (talk) 12:58, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Daniel. INeverCry 23:29, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Daniel. -- Pofka (talk) 11:16, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Pudelek (talk) 23:14, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Ivar (talk) 07:10, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Binocular compound microscope, Carl Zeiss Jena, 1914 (6779276516).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2015 at 22:53:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info created by ZEISS Microscopy, uploaded by Pigsonthewing, nominated by Yann (talk) 22:53, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Yann (talk) 22:53, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:16, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - At first glance, this might seem to someone to be purely an encyclopedic image. In my opinion, it's something more: A very well-composed portrait of an object. Congratulations! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:37, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:58, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great image, and it's good to recognise quality uploads from organisations who donate media. Andy Mabbett (talk) 11:35, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:26, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:59, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 13:48, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support A little CA in places, but not egregious. Daniel Case (talk) 18:02, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support A beautiful old instrument, well photographed. INeverCry 20:30, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow, cool picture PierreSelim (talk) 08:17, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 11:10, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 13:25, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great image and HEV. $Jacopo Werther iγ\partialψ=mψ$ 19:11, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:13, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 09:28, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 15:42, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support A beautiful machine, but I wonder why they used a Canon lens to take this picture instead of a Zeiss one. dllu (t,c) 22:02, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support High EV, nice studio shot. --Laitche (talk) 11:12, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:17, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very beautiful. --Ximonic (talk) 11:05, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 12:09, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:Bronze Horseman 02.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2015 at 14:44:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Sculptures
Info created and uploaded by Florstein - nominated by A.Savin --A.Savin 14:44, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 14:44, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:53, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I really like the sense of lift in this picture. The horse almost seems to be rising skyward. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:59, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Strikingly composed but oversharpened. Daniel Case (talk) 21:22, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hm? I don't see sharpening issues and also there is almost no noise. --A.Savin 04:42, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is a slight "shadow" behind the statue against the sky. It could be caused by dragging the "details" slider on certain postprocessing software, but it could also be caused by manual burning. In any case, it's rather subtle I think. dllu (t,c) 07:59, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That was what I was talking about. Thanks for the clarification on how it can come about ... my understanding had always been that it resulted from oversharpening (of course, dragging the details slider too far is arguably the same thing by another name). Daniel Case (talk) 03:33, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:49, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:14, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:47, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 13:10, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Magnificent. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:54, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 12:17, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:11, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 06:28, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice. My one tiny nitpick would be that I'd like it a bit better if the jet trail by the back knee was removed. INeverCry 02:13, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 13:40, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 12:10, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Sculptures

File:Expedition 46 Launch (NHQ201512150033).jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2015 at 19:46:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Space exploration
Info created by NASA/Joel Kowsky - uploaded and nominated by Ras67 -- Ras67 (talk) 19:46, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info Launch of Soyuz TMA-19M from Gagarin's Start to bring Expedition 46 crew members to the ISS.
Support Good mood and composition, high encyclopedic value -- Ras67 (talk) 19:46, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question - Can you correct the slanting on the right and left sides? It's distracting. I'd like vertical things to look vertical, not slanted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:29, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed the two lattice masts, but the placards in the foreground are difficult without lens profile. --Ras67 (talk) 17:58, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It's a lot better now. I'm still not positive everything is straight even now, though. I'd like to support this, but I don't feel yet that I can. I think the problem is the big lattice mast on the right, which now seems to my eye, especially relative to the other one farther away and the placard, to be leaning slightly to the right. I find the composition adequate to support, but I take B137's point on "grittiness". I was ascribing it to rocket fuel exhaust, but close inspection shows it to be nearly equal throughout the picture frame. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:17, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Too much going on in this to give it any wow. Daniel Case (talk) 01:46, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Daniel and for distortion. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:25, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quite distorted. --Tremonist (talk) 13:40, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Looks "gritty". Doesn't have much going for it besides extreme megapixel count. Not every NASA or US gov work is spectacular just because the cameras are good. B137 (talk) 22:59, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Daniel. INeverCry 23:08, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. -- Pofka (talk) 11:10, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 12:08, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gymnadenia odoratissima - Lõhnav käoraamat Niitvälja.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2015 at 17:55:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
Info Short Spurred Fragrant Orchid. Niitvälja Bog, Northwestern Estonia. All by Ivar (talk) 17:56, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 17:56, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I would have preferred a greater depth of field. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:50, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm OK with it; DoF is in line with other images like this we've promoted. Daniel Case (talk) 23:39, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 06:19, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 12:15, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support The subject is basically just another well-done shot of a purple orchid. We've had plenty of those and frankly they've basically lost their wow for me. The bokeh looks a bit … well … crazy, but it works very well for me. Gives me an idea of what's in the background (grass?) while blurring it enough to make it non-distracting. --El Grafo (talk) 13:07, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:15, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 19:09, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 21:35, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 08:20, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 12:11, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants

File:Hillman Library, exterior.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2015 at 19:14:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info created by User:dllu - uploaded by User:dllu - nominated by Dllu -- dllu (t,c) 19:14, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- dllu (t,c) 19:14, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Excellent job. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:06, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:40, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:51, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Some might say it's too dark. But I think that works in this image's favor, as it captures what people don't like about brutalism while remaining a striking, symmetrical image. Daniel Case (talk) 04:52, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Neutral~~ (Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 19:30, 15 December 2015 (UTC)) Really good idea! The author has talent for seeing uncommon in common things... The photo is "nearly wow" for me. But at the same time this "uncommonnes" gives rise to some doubts: the view seems to be unusual, artificial; judging other photos of the library, the building on the photo became unrecognizable... (in whole, this isn't a problem, but also isn't especially desirable for Commons). The library is a rather heavy, ponderous building and here it looks a rather dynamic structure. On the one hand this dynamism is a godsend of the photographer, on the other hand... Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 07:08, 14 December 2015 (UTC).[reply]
Support as others. Well done, even in the dark areas. It would be even better than good, if you clone out the distracted person. --Hubertl 13:02, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too dark for me. Have a lack of whites and blacks, and I would crop a little bit the bottom to remove handrail. I'm little bit without patience, so I edited the JPEG and uploaded as a alternative down below. -- RTA 10:09, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Same for me. Too dark. -- Pofka (talk) 12:14, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Same as below, seems to be tilted very slightly. --Tremonist (talk) 13:19, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think this photo is, so to say, pure art, a play on form, but not an architectural photo with educational... bla-bla... But anyhow:support. And the removal of a garbage can on the left is a good idea. Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 19:30, 15 December 2015 (UTC).[reply]
Oppose per Pofka --Pudelek (talk) 12:43, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Too dark -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:29, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative edit

Brighter version. -- RTA 10:09, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- RTA 10:09, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Pofka (talk) 12:14, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Perhaps very slightly tilted (to the left?). --Tremonist (talk) 13:18, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Tremonist I tried when I was editing, the problem is a distortion, the top don't beautiful align to the bottom. I didn't stop to know how to fix. -- RTA 19:17, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Too much bright IMO. Correction needed -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:55, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Too bright George?? Russians... too long winters... -- RTA 19:17, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- PS:"6 December 2015, 14:58:39" In the pic of sun light, so...
Comment I think I prefer the brighter version, but should we use it if it's not true to how it actually looked? This is becoming a recurring question from me. What's the consensus philosophy on this? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:36, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Ikan Kekek, probably it's more likely to be closer to the edited version. I just increase sliders in Lightroom, not some extreme Gimp/Photoshop editions and see this.-- RTA 19:17, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. ~~I'm therefore Supporting this version and favor it over the other version.~~ [See below: I prefer the third version, though I go back and forth between that and the original, as there is a good point to be made that a darker shot that focuses more on grayness makes a kind of comment on Brutalism.] -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:28, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For that, I would prefer B&W... -- RTA 09:40, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment imho postprocessing went too far, sky has signes on posterization. --Ivar (talk) 18:30, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Ivar the author did something weird, see this: [6], when I just raise up the light that appeared, probably a cut something, and this could be the why he left in dark.-- RTA 19:17, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No mood is shown. This version is interesting, but, in whole, rather ordinary photo. + Technical issues: posterization is visible, a black garbage can was cloned out rather untidy. Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 19:30, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- [edit conflict]
- I had uploaded the wrong file, and Dmitry Ivanov, this is obvious, this is a JPEG edition, the author should be the one doing this version from RAW. This is just to give a general idea, but I "fixed". -- RTA 19:58, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Less enthusiastic support This still has the striking composition but looks like many of our other photos of brutalist buildings. Yes, they were meant to look good in sunlight. But, as the original nomination shows, when raw-concrete buildings were erected in notoriously cloudy places like the U.S. Rust Belt and the North of England, they tended in the predominantly gray weather to look less like the high-minded libraries and residences they contained within and rather more like the place the missing dissident was last seen being escorted into by the secret police who had shoved him/her into the unmarked van. Daniel Case (talk) 05:13, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support This version is good --Pudelek (talk) 12:05, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Certainly beautiful but I prefer the other version below. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:02, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative by author edit

Info Reprocessed from raw file with brighter midtones and shadows, new crop, and new perspective correction. dllu (t,c) 19:42, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- dllu (t,c) 19:42, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - It's a close question for me, but I think this is probably the happy medium between the two other photos. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:49, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 21:30, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Pofka, Rodrigo.Argenton, and Pudelek: What do you think of this version? dllu (t,c) 00:41, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- dllu, I'm thinking, because if you did that to enhance the greys, as Daniel Case suggested, than I would prefer in B&W. If not, I would like to see more light, bringing the warm colours to the frontal element and creating this contrast with cool colours at the background, this would create more impact on picture. -- RTA 09:40, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support This probably is the finest version. -- Pofka (talk) 13:34, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Pofka -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:29, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Pofka, although the RTA's version is very beautiful. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:59, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:31, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. INeverCry 00:48, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral (sooner oppose, in reality, but for sake of good statistics, let it be neutral). The first, “dark”, photo is interesting for it is an example of the play on form and for it gives rises to some sullen mood, calls up some thoughts (something about suppressing totalitarian powers). As of the form, this image is OK, but a significant part of mood and thoughts was lost. And another issue: in this, brighter, photo the garbage cans on the left (and also the sitting man in the background (on the left)) became more visible and distracting. Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 15:30, 19 December 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 12:12, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

The chosen alternative is: File:Hillman Library, exterior (brighter).jpg

File:Per Hansson portrait.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2015 at 16:38:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media#Portrait
Info created by Patricija Jurksaityte - uploaded by Patricija Jurksaityte - nominated by Laura1822 (talk) 16:38, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Beautiful example of contemporary portraiture. -- Laura1822 (talk) 16:38, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support I honestly thought this one was another photograph (and I would have !voted for it even then). Daniel Case (talk) 06:07, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ as per Daniel. Yann (talk) 09:54, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose I changed my mind. As per other below. Yann (talk) 10:53, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:47, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 12:02, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:26, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 13:52, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:55, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is the cross clipped on the painting itself or just in this image? --Uoaei1 (talk) 21:30, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The artist (who was the uploader) could answer that, but she does not appear to be active on commons. But in my opinion, the composition is exactly right: if it were expanded to include the entire processional crucifix, the portrait would lose some of its intimacy, as well as balance. One could also discuss the symbolism and how that would be changed. Good art stands up to that sort of scrutiny. Laura1822 (talk) 15:32, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - I didn't catch that the painter was the uploader. In that case, I vote to Support featuring this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:08, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I absolutely would vote to feature this if it were a portrait photograph, rather than a photograph of a portrait. But I'm not sure how to judge a photograph of a painting, unless I've seen the painting in the flesh. How do the rest of you judge the quality of reproductions? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:19, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too kitsch for my taste.--Jebulon (talk) 11:40, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The painting is not outstanding or noteworthy (somewhat per Jebulon I think). As a portrait, a photo would be more helpful. — Julian H.^✈ 16:02, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per opposers above, sorry. --Cayambe (talk) 18:58, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Only 7.5Mpix photo of painting is not enough for current FP and if this pic was a photograph, it would get not a few oppose votes because of composition-wise, imho. --Laitche (talk) 10:38, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Abyssal (talk) 16:02, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 12:07, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tropical kingbird (Tyrannus melancholicus).JPG, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2015 at 20:02:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes
Info all by User:Charlesjsharp -- Charles (talk) 20:02, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charles (talk) 20:02, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:12, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I know there's an aesthetic disagreement at issue, and I don't expect my viewpoint to carry the day, but I'll express my opinion, anyway. The bird and the branch are very clear, but the deliberately blurred background in this case is unpleasant for me to look at and tends to make me dizzy. I understand that this blurring is intentional, but I feel impelled to criticize it, anyway. A bit of blurring is understandable, but blurring the background beyond recognition does not reflect how a viewer would actually see that scene, and I find it a bad effect. Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:41, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ikan. ~~Moreover, it is not the original photo: [7]~~ --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:53, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I have no problems with this bokeh; the point is to isolate the intended subject. But if it makes Ikan uncomfortable to look at, I understand his objection although I do not share it. To address Medium's point, the picture should have a {{Retouched image}} template on it ... I leave it to Charles. Daniel Case (talk) 05:10, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done Retouched template added. I made it perfectly clear on the image page that I had cloned out the branch and you can also clearly see the extent to which noise has been reduced in the background. Nothing is hidden. @Ikan Kekek: There has been no other 'blurring' of the background. Charles (talk) 10:14, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I saw that you had indicated in the image upload history that the branch was removed, but adding the template not only makes that information more obvious but has the (ahem) added benefit of putting the image in the corresponding category for retouched images. Daniel Case (talk) 15:48, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand that remark. The entire background is completely blurred. I understand that's intentional, but that doesn't change the fact. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:38, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I added a reference to the editing that you have indicated. I maintain my oppostion for cloning the branch is hurt; there are four times the same portion of the branch. The branch "broken" does not appear natural. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:06, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done New version uploaded with improved cloning. Charles (talk) 23:08, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support fine, crystal clear sharpness on the right point. --Hubertl 12:59, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Actually, it is much better with such a bokeh, than a busy background. Yann (talk) 14:04, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:41, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:51, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 12:12, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 12:53, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:20, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 15:52, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:07, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support :-)) --Gzzz (talk) 21:52, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 08:19, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 10:59, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 12:13, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes

File:Berger's Clouded Yellow - Colias sareptensis 03.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2015 at 06:18:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
Info Colias sareptensis (Berger's Clouded Yellow butterfly), created and uploaded by Zcebeci - nominated by Christian Ferrer --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:18, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:18, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 08:18, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful colors. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:38, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:28, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Arion. --Tremonist (talk) 13:30, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice picture indeed - shame about the damaged wing though which makes it seem like a different species. Charles (talk) 17:54, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 18:49, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support INeverCry 20:35, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 21:58, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Butterfly is detailed and in focus. Daniel Case (talk) 04:58, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 11:08, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Daniel. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:56, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 09:29, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful colors. --Laitche (talk) 11:20, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:17, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 13:39, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 11:06, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:51, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:51, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:37, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera

File:Strasbourg Lycée int pontonniers 01.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2015 at 11:16:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info Lycée international des Pontonniers in Strasbourg. Erected in 1902, this building is a good example of architectural historicism or revivalism. It is listed as 'monument historique' in France. All by Cayambe -- (talk) 11:16, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info Another image of this building and its surroundings was recently promoted to FP.

That one was taken in a different season, with the leaves down. Daniel Case (talk) 16:29, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Cayambe (talk) 11:16, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Pretty. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:01, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose The scaffolding should not be in the picture. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 15:34, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Could be a little sharper on the leaves. And, really, the scaffolding is in shadow. You really have to be looking for it (I didn't see it at all, Medium, until I saw your annotation after making my original !vote. And I can easily unsee it). Daniel Case (talk) 16:29, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:23, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 07:19, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 08:10, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Gzzz (talk) 21:56, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light direction. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:09, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:36, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Tours Saint-Jacques - 195.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2015 at 12:40:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Medium69 -- Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:40, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:40, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful green scenery! --Tremonist (talk) 13:36, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Tremonist. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:03, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 14:28, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:38, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - The rise from right to left strikes me as an unusual view, but after looking at it for a while, I increasingly accepted it. Very nice scene. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:58, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I might have gone with less exposure if possible, and the trees near the top are little less sharp than they could be, but overall this works for me. Daniel Case (talk) 06:37, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 11:06, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support not very spectecular relating to the wow-factor, but a balanced work. --Hubertl 18:44, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:13, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition. IMO it's tilted CW. --XRay ^talk 21:59, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@XRay:

Done Indeed, there was a slight distortion accompanied by an inclination. I repaired the defects. Thank you for your remark. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:23, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 09:28, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 15:46, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:42, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the composition and forest. I think you should go back there in the fall.--ArildV (talk) 11:15, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition. --Laitche (talk) 11:25, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 11:07, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:50, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:38, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Cathedral of Saint Cecilia of Albi - 7095 - Altar and choir.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2015 at 15:12:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info created & uploaded by PierreSelim - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 15:12, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 15:12, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Beautiful cathedral and photo. Someone will object to the presence of scaffolding, but it was there, and it does not spoil the photo for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:51, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 20:06, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:03, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The scaffolding isn't too bad. What bugs me is that strip of light reflection on the floor at bottom right and the corresponding sun pinhole in the wall above it. The image would be much nicer without them. INeverCry 02:25, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 11:06, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 13:50, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:39, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Noisy at the top, but as I've said that happens in long exposures. Daniel Case (talk) 16:34, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
weak support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:11, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 21:57, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:41, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support THank you Tomer T and the others support (as always any feedback is always welcome to improve the work we do.) --PierreSelim (talk) 10:30, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:32, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support--ArildV (talk) 11:12, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 11:28, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:50, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:55, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:50, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:39, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

File:Laleh.JPG, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2015 at 14:58:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
Info Featured picture on 2 Encyclopedias.created by Simsala111 - uploaded by Simsala111 - nominated by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 -- ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 14:58, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 14:58, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I find that picture pleasant to look at, so I'm supporting it, but please indicate clearly which Central Park the flowers are in. I'd strongly urge you to add the category of the relevant city to the categories this picture is currently listed in. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:16, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I added some text indicating more clearly that it's the Central Park most people would think of first. As for my !vote: The red flowers are great. The yellow ones, not so much ... the further to the background, the more blown the highlights and the waxier they look overall. Daniel Case (talk) 18:54, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not clear exactly where this photo was taken. See User talk:Ikan Kekek#hello and thanks for your support.. Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:04, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose No wow for me. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:45, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose QI for me. --Tremonist (talk) 13:24, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Daniel. INeverCry 00:36, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 21:37, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:McEwen Bridge.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2015 at 17:05:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges
Info created, uploaded, nominated by Óðinn -- Óðinn (talk) 17:05, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Óðinn (talk) 17:05, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I recently added a thumbnail of this photo to Wikivoyage:Vaughan. I find it wonderfully restful and welcoming, and it sort of embraces the viewer with plant life. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:53, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Might've been processed a touch more than I'd like, but overall this is still an image I'm tempted to walk right into. Daniel Case (talk) 18:56, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 19:43, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:22, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support getting lost in time..--Hubertl 22:29, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:37, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:50, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Caducity. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:49, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Nice composition. —Bruce1ee^talk 10:30, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 12:08, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:25, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 19:10, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 21:32, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 08:08, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Where are the Hobbits ? --Gzzz (talk) 21:58, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:26, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support INeverCry 00:32, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't know exactly what the problem is but the detail processing looks strange to me, many of the thin lines are too bright as a result of sharpening I think. — Julian H.^✈ 13:35, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 12:39, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:38, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges

File:Nasir-al molk -1.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2015 at 21:33:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Info created and uploaded by Ayyoubsabawiki - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:33, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support More Iranian architecture. -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:33, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I like this picture very much. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:29, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice to see some non-Christian stained-glass windows. Daniel Case (talk) 06:09, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:39, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Enchanting. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:58, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:47, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Spectacular colors - thats it. I miss informations about the hall itself. I cannot imagine, that everything is lost in darkness, the technique used is wrong IMO, it should have been HDR. therefore I dont see any educational benefit. QI maybe, but for me definitiv no FP. Sorry for that, because it is a great motif for sure. --Hubertl 10:52, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not to suggest you're wrong to !vote the way you have, but I could see this image being used effectively on a wikivoyage page, where the idea is as much to create interest in visiting a place as to convey information about it. Daniel Case (talk) 17:23, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Dark but magical. -- Pofka (talk) 12:01, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. Darkness can sometimes be intriguing and draw the viewer in. This picture does that to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:23, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support per others. --Tremonist (talk) 13:27, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:48, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gzzz (talk) 22:01, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:20, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 13:41, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 09:52, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

File:Goldendoodle puppy Marty.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2015 at 05:28:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Info created by William Warby - uploaded by Bruce1ee - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1ee^talk 05:28, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info A goldendoodle is a poodle/golden retriever hybrid. —Bruce1ee^talk 05:28, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- —Bruce1ee^talk 05:28, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:57, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:48, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support even when she/he´s looking arrogant! ;-) --Hubertl 10:56, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 12:00, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:19, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 13:44, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:45, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Now we know what's going to win POTY ... Daniel Case (talk) 15:51, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Just a dog, nothing extraordinary. Distracting background --Uoaei1 (talk) 21:26, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think with a pet photo FPC, you should choose a better background. Charles (talk) 18:04, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Uoaei1.--Fotoriety (talk) 21:54, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but f/2,8 wasn't the best choice. Nose is unsharp and the background is also not very good. --Ivar (talk) 06:33, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice dog, but nose out of focus, too low DOF, sorry -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:54, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Laitche (talk) 21:11, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Laitche ;) --Pudelek (talk) 10:48, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per other opposes. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:23, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lovely example of ssssssooooooo voting :-) -- Colin (talk) 12:44, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:21, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:HGM - Stiegenhaus 0311 2 3 4.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2015 at 12:23:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors
Info The ceiling of the stairway hall, Museum of military history, Vienna. All by -- Hubertl 12:23, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hubertl 12:23, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Photographer (talk) 12:56, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 13:50, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:25, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:54, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:14, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:40, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:09, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 22:08, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support INeverCry 22:47, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:12, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:33, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow, very nice composition and good quality.--ArildV (talk) 11:07, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 11:35, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:14, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 19:38, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 20:07, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:56, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:47, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:49, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressed --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:10, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support $Jacopo Werther iγ\partialψ=mψ$ 18:58, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:15, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

File:Poertschach Promenadenbad Blumeninsel mit Pappeln 18112015 9156.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2015 at 10:18:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Johann Jaritz 10:18, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:18, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:49, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 10:54, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No "wow". --Kikos (talk) 11:13, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Same for me. No "wow". Gray and usual. Support Corrections helped. -- Pofka (talk) 11:59, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks, Pofka and Kikos, for your constructive review. I increased the saturation and luminance of the colors yellow and orange to get rid of the boring gray impression and charged this reworked version. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 13:11, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Hubertl: , in the meanwhile I increased the saturation and luminance of the colors yellow and orange. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 13:16, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Medium69: , in the meanwhile I increased the saturation and luminance of the colors yellow and orange. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 13:16, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

still ok for me. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:19, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kikos: , in the meanwhile I increased the saturation and luminance of the colors yellow and orange. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 13:16, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How can increase such manipulations wowiness of this casual scene? Still nothing remarkable, sorry. --Kikos (talk) 06:48, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pofka: , in the meanwhile I increased the saturation and luminance of the colors yellow and orange. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 13:16, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would be happy to support featuring this beautiful, restful landscape, but first, I'd like some reassurance that after all the edits you did, the colors are accurate (or accurate enough to be a fair representation of the scene). As an aside, Pörtschach is apparently a really beautiful place. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:19, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek: The colors are original, I assure you for that matter of fact. The leaves of the poplars were that yellow and the reeds do have this beige-orange color. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:20, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. In that case, I'm happy to

Support featuring this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:45, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Quite nice. --Tremonist (talk) 13:46, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice color and symmetry. Daniel Case (talk) 17:38, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support the last version is much better. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:11, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 21:22, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 07:18, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Kikos. I think other photos from this place are more-WOW --Pudelek (talk) 12:33, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 19:03, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Il WOW qui si è perso per strada!LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:38, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Sad colours... The same picture taken two weeks earlier would have been awesome ! Gzzz (talk) 22:07, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I do find it lacks a bit of colour (naturally, I think the processing is done well). — Julian H.^✈ 13:48, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:44, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:20, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:AT 119587 Jesuitenkirche Wien Innenansicht 9179.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2015 at 22:28:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info Ceiling and construction above the altar of the Jesuit church, Vienna, all by -- Hubertl 22:28, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hubertl 22:28, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:01, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:13, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:48, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:06, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 10:31, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:34, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:56, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:40, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~{{o}}~~ great composition, but the lower right corner are blurred.--ArildV (talk) 10:56, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I´m really thankful that you´ve seen this fault, ArildV! Thanks to a series of seven frames for this HDR (I used just five before), I was able to reprocess this without the corrupted one. Now it´s even more brillant, I guess, even when I did everything like before. --Hubertl 12:28, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Support Thank you for the new version.--ArildV (talk) 12:31, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Óðinn (talk) 15:47, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 19:37, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 20:05, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:49, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:58, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:49, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sure! LivioAndronico ^(talk) 20:48, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Gorgeous. --Laitche (talk) 14:56, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support $Jacopo Werther iγ\partialψ=mψ$ 18:56, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:11, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

File:Cementera, Yura, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 129-131 HDR.JPG, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2015 at 16:59:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Industry
Info Cement plant in the Yura District, Peru. All by me, Poc o² 16:59, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 16:59, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Unusual picture. It's a little hazy in places, but in this case, I think that gives the image a kind of magical effect, along with the pitch black color of the rest of the picture and the stars in the sky. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:08, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I find the light pollution too strong and unappealing.--Fotoriety (talk) 22:13, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I think it would benefit from cropping out most of the sky above, which has little to see save some streaky stars that can only be seen at full-size and, honestly, don't add anything. Daniel Case (talk) 23:00, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see a whole bunch of stars at normal thumbnail size (I mean the size on the file's page). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:49, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever. To me the point is that they add little, if anything, to the image. Daniel Case (talk) 04:59, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Of course that's a completely valid opinion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:01, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ralf Roleček 07:16, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 09:26, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:04, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support A great light show! --Tremonist (talk) 13:13, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Without the stars, it would be ordinary... --Yann (talk) 14:43, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support am I important now, being the 7th? --Hubertl 22:59, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Interesting, but per Daniel Case. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:00, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support At first I thought to oppose it due to the reasons mentioned by Daniel, but when I opened it at the full size, my mind changed completely. Cropping these stars would really hurt this picture. -- Pofka (talk) 11:27, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too black.--Jebulon (talk) 11:38, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 3 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:15, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Industry

File:Stift Zwettl Kreuzgang Brunnenhaus 03.JPG, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2015 at 21:18:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Austria
Info Lavatorium at the cloister of Zwettl Abbey, Lower Austria. All by me -- Uoaei1 (talk) 21:18, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Uoaei1 (talk) 21:18, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Parts of it are a little fuzzy at full resolution (probably mostly actually how the light looked), but it's a beautiful composition and subject, and it looks great at full screen on my laptop. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:31, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support the complexity of the motif convinced me. --Hubertl 01:21, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Ikan. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:06, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Measured support per the minor imperfections noted by Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 05:23, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:05, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:14, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really nice. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:33, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition looks just about perfect. Very impressive image. INeverCry 23:59, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 11:24, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too strange perspective and deformation.--Jebulon (talk) 11:37, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 13:25, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:08, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Austria

File:PlayadePiedraantesdeVarese-dic2015.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2015 at 13:07:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of a beach of stone near Varese Beach, Mar del Plata, Argentina

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
Info All by --Ezarateesteban 13:07, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, sorry. The haze reduces the contrast too much and the mid-day light doesn't help. I think an early morning shot would be much stronger. — Julian H.^✈ 13:52, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Noisy. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:57, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry, but as Julian. --Hubertl 15:54, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I have to agree with the others. It's too bad, because the composition is very pretty. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:55, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. Daniel Case (talk) 22:25, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per the above opposes. I agree with Ikan though that the composition is good. I hope you can return to that spot for a second try. INeverCry 22:46, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:47, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others.--ArildV (talk) 11:05, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Tremonist (talk) 13:57, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:10, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Griechisches Parlament.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2015 at 05:02:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info all by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald 05:02, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald 05:02, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - This picture probably would have been worthy of support if it had just been another well-taken monumental shot of a government building in the middleground distance, but the three long shadows in the foreground make it much more interesting. Pretty sky, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:32, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'm the shadow on the right... ;-) -- Wolf im Wald 05:36, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support I can see why that portion of the image is included, but I actually find the shadows distracting. But only after they were noted. Daniel Case (talk) 06:27, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:03, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:38, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:40, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 15:35, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support More pictures from Greece. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:37, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support more von Gärtner --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:53, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 11:45, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Those three foreground shadows of people kill it for me. Otherwise it would be a very nice image. INeverCry 23:57, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@INeverCry, Pofka, Jebulon, and Iifar: In golden hour you can't take an image there without your own shadow on it (if you use a focal length of 16mm). Therefore my shadow on the right is not avoidable. Wether you prefer the version with 3 shadows or another version with only the photographers shadow is matter of taste in my opinion. I prefer the 3 shadows. :-) Regards, -- Wolf im Wald 01:21, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Der Wolf im Wald: other possibilities to avoid shadows: bottom crop, panorama shot or golden hour in autumn/spring. Regards, --Ivar (talk) 06:24, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Shadows mentioned by INeverCry. -- Pofka (talk) 11:23, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Shadows.--Jebulon (talk) 11:36, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others, sorry. --Ivar (talk) 16:43, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The shadows are too disturbing and isn't the composition a bit boring? --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:32, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Shadows and light conditions. -- -donald- (talk) 08:58, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 12:31, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 13:25, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 19:22, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 15:59, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:12-06-05-innsbruck-by-ralfr-164.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2015 at 07:14:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info Innsbruck Airport, Austria - all by Ralf Roleček
Support -- Ralf Roleček 07:14, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:06, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition. --Tremonist (talk) 13:42, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support A little distorted at the corners, but understandable with such a wide angle. Daniel Case (talk) 17:05, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:13, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support as Daniel --Hubertl 10:10, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
weak support per Daniel --Pudelek (talk) 10:46, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:39, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm sorry, but I don't see good composition here. Huge parking lot with random cars and beautiful mountains just doesn't fit together for me. -- Pofka (talk) 11:19, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Pofka.--Jebulon (talk) 11:34, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. The white balance seems too warm and the cars at the edges are very distorted. -- Colin (talk) 12:55, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:04, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Stift Haug, Würzburg, Crossing and Apsis 20150811 2.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2015 at 15:39:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Info created and uploaded by DXR - nominated by Σπάρτακος -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 15:39, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 15:39, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Jebulon (talk) 16:20, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 18:26, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love all those curves. Daniel Case (talk) 19:35, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:03, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 22:28, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:23, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:07, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great. --Code (talk) 07:56, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ArildV (talk) 10:50, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive. --Laitche (talk) 11:49, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:12, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow. Very nice emphasis on the circles. - Benh (talk) 14:15, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 19:36, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:48, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:01, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:48, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:53, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:06, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

File:2013.08.02.-13-Kirschgartshaeuser Schlaege Mannheim-Suedliche Mosaikjungfer-Maennchen.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2015 at 19:32:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family_:_Aeshnidae_.28Hawker_dragonflies.29
Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 19:32, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hockei (talk) 19:32, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice detail and colors on top of the form and simplicity of the image. Daniel Case (talk) 21:34, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:16, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 11:11, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:57, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice blue-green contrast. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:33, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Head in shadow.--Fotoriety (talk) 21:58, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:25, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 08:18, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 20:19, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose My first thought on looking at this is just what Fotoriety says above. INeverCry 23:25, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice colors and detail, but the shadow mentioned above ruins everything... -- Pofka (talk) 11:15, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Why do we need another FP when we already have a nice one of the same insect taken by the same talented photographed three minutes earlier? Charles (talk) 12:48, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Shadowed head. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:38, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others, especially Charles. If you take several good pictures of the same subject at the same time, please choose one as the "finest". That's what FP is about: finest. -- Colin (talk) 12:57, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Hockei (talk) 06:35, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:19, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lajedo de Pai Mateus - Pedra do Capacete-Edit.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2015 at 21:40:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy
Info First nomination. Noise reduced by Poco a poco. This kind of picture has been nominated at FPC: 1, 2, 3. Created and uploaded by Ruy Carvalho (edited by Poco a poco) - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:40, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support What do you think about this one, Kruusamägi? -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:40, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 22:01, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 22:52, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:26, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Again, noise perfectly forgivable when the shutter is open for 30 seconds. Daniel Case (talk) 03:22, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Help me with this a little. It looks great as a thumbnail and still looks quite good at the largest size that fits entirely on my screen, but the entire picture is fuzzy when I look at full resolution. For example, and I hope my choice of words doesn't seem insulting, but a lot of the stars look like blotches. I know you have very demanding standards in judging photos, so please give me insight into how are you appraising this one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:50, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Second thought, on looking at the Perseid shower photo again: I guess these two photos really are comparable in fuzziness at full resolution, and this photo does look excellent at lower resolutions. I suppose I'll vote to

Support it, too. Maybe the approximate size of the rock should be noted, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:00, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of terrain is this, though? The colors seem unusual to me. Is it moonlit? Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:02, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support It's in Brasil, isn't it? --Neptuul (talk) 09:45, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong opposition! - Again? This photo still have all the problems that I listed before, he didn't use Mathematica to create this photo, this start trail is a mistake, longer exposure that should be. Clearly the intention was not create trails, was to froze the moment. The sharpness on the rock is non-existent. This photo works in 720p, not the in minimum resolution that we demand, and works for beauty propose, we don't have the scale, for educational one, no, this is giant rock, seems to be a small one in front of a camera. [Edit conflict] and it's obvious that is Brazil, otherwise Arion would not insisting that much. -- RTA 10:04, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Rodrigo.Argenton: It's obvious that is a Arion's nomination, otherwise RTA would not insisting that much. Take the opportunity to oppose here too (the same quality). Or not oppose? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:27, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It's not the same quality, it's also not a FP, but this passive aggressive posture is ridiculous. -- RTA 13:05, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Perseiid.jpg" has clearly better quality. Kruusamägi (talk) 12:47, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Kruusamägi: I think that, if reduced the color noise, it will certainly be better. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:32, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:55, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ggia (talk) 07:12, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per RTA. --Kikos (talk) 09:51, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose very pity, but the quality is still too bad: JPG artefacts. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:21, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I´m thinking about this image for three days now, opened it three times. There is wow, a lot of, but the technical quality is too low for me.--Hubertl 15:58, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As before.--Jebulon (talk) 11:32, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose There's only about 1MP of image detail. Not sufficient for FP. Buy a Astronomy Photographer of the Year book and you'll see better photos in fine detail. -- Colin (talk) 13:02, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:20, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:2014.08.24.-05-Mannheim Rheinau--Mauereidechse.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2015 at 17:25:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family_:_Lacertidae_.28True_lizards.29
Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 17:25, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hockei (talk) 17:25, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - This is a good example of a portrait of an animal in its natural surroundings without bokeh. There is a degree of blurring in part of the picture frame because of the primary focus being on the lizard, but everything is visible and part of the picture. I might prefer for the lower right corner to be more in focus, but I'm willing to accept the picture as is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:44, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unfortunately, what makes it effective as a portrait of the animal in its natural environment also dooms it as an FP, for reasons I've gone into on other nominations—the background is too much of a distraction and the animal (as it intends to) blends into it. It's definitely a VI and probably a QI, though. Daniel Case (talk) 01:45, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So you think that a picture of an animal in its surroundings is per se not featurable, because you take it as a deficient portrait of an animal instead of viewing the composition as a whole and treating it as a "Landscape with Lizard"? If so, that's quite a different aesthetic than that of landscape paintings, in which there may be human or animal subjects in the painting, but the natural surroundings aren't blurred so as to have a singular focus on the human beings (or dogs or sheep or whatever). I haven't read your previous statements about this, so pardon me if I'm misunderstanding. Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:49, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I should say that I don't mean to suggest you are "wrong", only to understand your aesthetics and criteria. Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:03, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for asking for clarification. No, I don't think that pictures of animals in their natural surroundings are inherently unfeaturable. It's just that the details of the environment included are on many occasions at odds with an image that meets the FP aesthetic criteria. Especially when the animal's camouflage or whatever is shown to be partially working ... an image where the putative subject blends into the background is going to be one where you have a hard time seeing the subject. Daniel Case (talk) 06:27, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. I might even agree with you if the camouflage were so effective I really had trouble seeing the animal, such as would be the case with a leaf insect. In this case, I think the contrast is sufficient for the lizard to be pretty easily visible, but I definitely understand your point of view. Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:58, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:24, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support It's a fine photo, however, I agree with some of the criticism stated above. --Tremonist (talk) 13:46, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Nothing wrong with a "Landscape with Lizard" or "Lizard with natural environment" per se. That can work very well, and I think we should have much more of those (I know: probably impossible for shy lizards). ~~But as an image as a whole, this one doesn't "wow" me.~~ --El Grafo (talk) 14:43, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Imagine you have made a large print of this picture and this animal within this plants is looking in your eyes. Then you will see how beautiful it is and you will say "wow". I don't say that because it is my picture. I call it computer-monitor-blindness. --Hockei (talk) 16:00, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I think this would be better as a horizontal composition rather than square, and with the lizard more close-up, especially as his position and look toward the camera is very nice. He just gets a bit lost in the middle there. INeverCry 23:20, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I'm really frustrated by the opposition to this photo, as I consider it a good composition and I feel like the rest of you (maybe all of you) prefer photos that merely document a creature clearly and blur everything in the middleground and background unnaturally for that purpose. I don't expect to convince anyone with my comment, but I'm blowing off steam here because of the number of photos of the type I describe that come in for so much praise and support here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:59, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Ikan Kekek, I think you are right to challenge when you think reviewers are being too conservative in their thinking or stuck only thinking a certain kind of image is best or are perhaps just following a fashion. Sometimes, perhaps, a more unusual arrangement is more difficult to pull off successfully. The professional photographers make it look easy, but their failure-rate is high too. Reviewers can also be wildly inconsistent yet more likely to defend what they wrote than reconsider it. -- Colin (talk) 20:41, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Good points here and also in your review below. A photo of this lizard on rocks would probably have more contrast. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:46, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This lizard is way too cool looking to be placed dead center in a composition that's 80% foliage. INeverCry 02:55, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Changed crop. --Hockei (talk) 06:59, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - You should ping everyone who already commented, to see what they think of the picture now, with the new crop. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:05, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks for the hint. --Hockei (talk) 10:12, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support I like this new crop a lot more. The lizard looks like he's posing, and the foliage now frames him and is more clearly of secondary importance as it should be. INeverCry 07:54, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I do, too. I'm not sure I agree that the foliage is of such secondary importance for the composition, given the way I move my eye around the picture frame; I just think the composition is better. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:37, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Complimentary is probably closer to what I mean. INeverCry 08:58, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely. And as you said, with very good framing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:04, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case, Medium69, and El Grafo: Maybe you have fun to take a second review because of the new crop? --Hockei (talk) 10:12, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Too many things are not going in this picture, and cropping does not change it enough. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:55, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BAM! Works so much better now for me, I could actually imagine hanging a print of it on my wall. Not totally convinced quality-wise (general sharpness in the head area), but I've struck my oppose above. Thanks for pinging me. --El Grafo (talk) 10:45, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support yes, now it fits for me. --Hubertl 11:33, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not enough in focus for me, particularly the nose. Charles (talk) 12:44, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I appreciate the difficulty taking such a photo with long telephoto. According to the WP article, the natural habitat is rocky (hence the name) so am not sure this is the best background. The image seems a bit too bright for me. -- Colin (talk) 20:41, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Too bad. All people who see the print version are fascinated of it. I cannot comprehend the opposers. Also it's a pity that (in generally here) two or three people have apparently another reasons for giving negative votes than the picture itself (Seek and you will find). Thanks. --Hockei (talk) 06:33, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:18, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Christian cross near Maguelone Cathedral 01.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2015 at 17:12:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info All by Christian Ferrer --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:12, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:12, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support not really spectecular, but well balanced. Good to have some quiet images like that. --Hubertl 19:35, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
weak support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 20:27, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A QI, but nothing else for me.--Jebulon (talk) 21:51, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Jebulon. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:27, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Jebulon. Composition is a little too busy for the cross to stand out like it wants to. Also, it seems like the GND filter apparently used here was a little too obvious. Daniel Case (talk) 06:36, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It is an interesting idea, but the crosses is a too insignificant part of the images imo.--ArildV (talk) 10:42, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:47, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ivar (talk) 13:46, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lennuliiklust uurimas.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2015 at 14:35:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy
Info created and uploaded by Martin Mark - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 14:35, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 14:35, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
strong oppose Sorry, the green line and red bother me. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 17:37, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Besides, I'm surprised that you present it in FP after that: Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#File:Lennuliiklust_uurimas.jpg. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 18:04, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Those lines are the "main topic" of the image. You could also compare them with Iridium flare or with the line that is left by ISS. Kruusamägi (talk) 17:42, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree with the comments there at all and would like to see what people would think over here. Kruusamägi (talk) 19:27, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that if the image is not accepted as a quality image, I do not see how it could be accepted as FP. Good luck anyway. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 19:53, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion it has a very high image quality and it should definitely had gotten QI star. Kruusamägi (talk) 22:48, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Pofka (talk) 19:24, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Medium69. INeverCry 21:58, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Medium. Daniel Case (talk) 03:49, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Medium. --Tremonist (talk) 14:06, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination I don't agree with the comments above, but it ain't going anywhere anyway. Kruusamägi (talk) 14:42, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 21:08, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Údolí Bílé Opavy (Weiße Oppa) - by Pudelek.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2015 at 14:36:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 14:36, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 14:36, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Image is hazy and composition is jumbled. No wow factor. INeverCry 22:02, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow for me ; sorry. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:44, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per INeverCry. A shame, because I can see why you wanted to take this and you got most of it right. However, there was too much it to get right. Daniel Case (talk) 05:20, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I like the hazy colors and those little spots of light. I've found that the beauty of scenes like this is very difficult to translate into a photograph. I'm always having huge troubles framing forest shots, often because of the lack of a decent foreground object. You've found one, but the dead twigs on the left are a bit too prominent for my taste. --El Grafo (talk) 09:19, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per El Grafo. --Tremonist (talk) 14:47, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Pudelek (talk) 23:07, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 20:08, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tour Eiffel - 20150801 13h38 (10610).jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2015 at 22:51:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#France
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Medium69 -- Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:51, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:51, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Where is the ground??? -- -donald- (talk) 06:18, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The ground was frankly not good. There was almost no lawn. So I chose not to include it in my composition. see here : File:Champ-de-Mars - 20150801 15h29 (10620).jpg. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:17, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~Support~~ D'SuperHero (talk) 07:56, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Info Users whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. --Ivar (talk) 08:23, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Slightly tilted I assume. --Tremonist (talk) 14:42, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Slightly yes ; I fixed. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 16:09, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thank you, Medium! --Tremonist (talk) 16:53, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support There's always room for another FP of the Eiffel Tower. Daniel Case (talk) 16:29, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose...but not for this one IMO, which is leaning back, like if it will fall down in the Seine.--Jebulon (talk) 17:20, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is a slightly view against-diving. It is voluntary. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 18:28, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I don't like the cut off in the down below. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:13, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per donald. — Julian H.^✈ 10:34, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Come on folks. This one of the most photographed subjects in the world. We have thousands of photos of it, many of them quite equal to this and many superior. To pick just one File:Eiffel Tower from north Avenue de New York, Aug 2010.jpg is superior in just about every way, yet was taken 5 years ago. FP is about "finest" not just "nice". Daniel, I call you out in particular for a truly lame reason for support -- if ever a subject does not need "another" it is a totally unoriginal and technically unspectacular photo of the Eiffel Tower. Try instead to explain why this is one of the finest images on Commons. It's not. It's just a tourist snap. -- Colin (talk) 19:19, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thank you for your comments. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:05, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 09:49, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:DANSES POPULAIRES.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2015 at 09:33:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info created by Samia Dib Benkaci - uploaded by Samia Dib Benkaci - nominated by Vikoula5 -- Vikoula5 (talk) 09:33, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I thik this photo are featured, shots of Baroud which raises a mist of dust, cant be taken every day-- Vikoula5 (talk) 09:33, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not enough happening in this image. The gentleman in front is interesting, but he blocks out the two gentlemen behind him. The other men have their backs turned. Now wow factor for me, and not really an impressive illustration of the ritual/event IMO. INeverCry 10:46, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would like a little more description and information about what is going on. I am a little confused while I get it is some kind of an event anyway. --Ximonic (talk) 10:52, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This is a traditionelle marriage, and man shoot with a firearm. in this photo the shoot raises the sand. --Vikoula5 (talk) 13:06, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for explaining, but I think that for this photo too much explaining is needed in order to understand it correctly. It simply doesn't explain itself. --Tremonist (talk) 14:39, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per INeverCry. --Cayambe (talk) 10:57, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support very interesting. Kruusamägi (talk) 11:20, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per INeverCry. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:21, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per INeverCry. --Tremonist (talk) 14:37, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per INeverCry. Mood is there but the composition is not. Daniel Case (talk) 19:03, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ist a really great picture but the processing have errors. Colors are incorrect. --Ralf Roleček 23:04, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Vikoula5 (talk) 08:21, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 13:45, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nižný Komárnik (Alsókomárnok) - kostol.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2015 at 14:32:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 14:32, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 14:32, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Even though it's difficult to see here, I feel the photo is slightly tilted (leaning to the left). --Tremonist (talk) 15:11, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Left side leaning out, shadows are too dark. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:24, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I get the feeling that for the most part this was made possible by a polarizer or ND filter. And that probably helped. But that said, there is no excuse for the clipped side of the house. If that could be fixed somewhat I might be able to support. Daniel Case (talk) 21:12, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I uploaded new version, mayby now is better... --Pudelek (talk) 23:04, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Still not enough, alas. Daniel Case (talk) 06:21, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The photo is not bad, but for me only a QI. The centered composition is imho relatively boring and there is too less space at the front (grass) compared to the sky. IQ is only average, some shadows are nearly 100% black. --Tuxyso (talk) 23:30, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Tuxyso. INeverCry 02:58, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks for the voting, I withdraw my nomination --Pudelek (talk) 09:43, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 19:59, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Västerlånggatan January 2015.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jan 2016 at 10:16:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 10:16, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support The street Västerlånggatan in Gamla stan, the old town of Stockholm, Sweden.-- ArildV (talk) 10:16, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~I respectfully Oppose featuring this,~~ [changed to Neutral, lest my criteria might not be fair] because although the composition is perfectly good, the picture is just too dark. I realize that it's a night picture, and it might have been nearly impossible to use a sufficiently long exposure for good light overall without having huge problems with the lamps, but for whatever it's worth, this is my reaction as a viewer. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:36, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Ikan Kekek I respectfully dont understand your review. Did you have decent monitor? Too dark compared to what? Daylight, unnatural overexposed HDR? It is as far as I can see natural light, no black or dark shadows, no details or colours lost, good colours and exposure. More exposure would give an unnatural light. But because you believe that it is too dark, how much lighter do you want the images? It's a city street, not a single building lit by strong lights. it would be unrealistic to make the buildings and street brighter (and also spoil the mood in the picture) --ArildV (talk) 22:47, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - My monitor is fine and has been quite adequate to view other photos. I think what I'm saying is that in the absence of sufficient light, it just might not be possible to take a photo of that scene that satisfies me. But perhaps that's an unfair point of view, so I'll change my vote to an abstention. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:03, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice blue-hour tones, but on the whole I'm not wowed. Daniel Case (talk) 00:01, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Shame, but the blurred figures are a problem. Charles (talk) 10:00, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Darkened clipping in some areas, overall relatively usual scene with little visual interest (to me). Regarding the people, I think I'd actually prefer more blur. — Julian H.^✈ 10:11, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Ok, personaly i think this historic street with old buildings in intresting.--ArildV (talk) 10:12, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:25, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weissensee Techendorf Ruderboot zieht Schlauchboot 24072014 477.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jan 2016 at 09:08:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Johann Jaritz -- 09:08, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:08, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support A well made document about typical post-colonial attitudes of male german holiday makers in Southern Austria. A undernourished young boy is supporting his family by rowing this guy in a RX-4000 high speed rubber dinghy around the lake for probably on Euro per hour, so he can save up the fare for the official tour boat. It has not changed so much in the last 50 years. ;-) --Hubertl 09:58, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry Johan but i don't understand how is possible for this pic to be Featured! Is a normal pic that is possible do everywhere. In few words,no wow! --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 10:45, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Livio, although not quite so emphatically stated . Daniel Case (talk) 17:30, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination I apologize for that Christmas slip. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:30, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:27, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:SR VL22M Satsire.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2015 at 22:26:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles
Info all by Kabelleger -- Kabelleger (talk) 22:26, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Probably the last operational ВЛ22М (VL22M) with a local train from Kutaisi to Tkibuli, Georgia. The "train" is actually a rebuilt refrigerator car! Plus, I guess we don't have much stuff from Georgia yet. Reason enough for a nomination ;)
Abstain as author -- Kabelleger (talk) 22:26, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support fantastic work, as so often! Thank you for your pictures! --Hubertl 22:54, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice work --Pudelek (talk) 23:56, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Awesome! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:18, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support dllu (t,c) 00:34, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:26, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 05:04, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Hubertl. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:25, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 06:36, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - That's really pretty. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:47, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:59, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great colors, light and scene. I do think it would be improved a bit by cropping on the left, or even more tightly on the train. But it's good enough as is. Daniel Case (talk) 07:01, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 10:27, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:53, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This doesn't wow me at all. The train is nice, but the bottom part of the cables run right along the mountain tops, and the top cables run through the only significant clouds. The dirt road at left is another minus. INeverCry 23:35, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support That dirty road at the left side actually isn't necessary, still a really nice picture. -- Pofka (talk) 11:12, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- To my eyes, the dirt road sets up a plane that interacts diagonally with the mountains and kind of frames the train and tracks. I like it and think it might actually improve the picture, although I can imagine a good picture in which it's cropped. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:31, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:46, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Uninteresting centered composition. Many ugly details.--Jebulon (talk) 11:35, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Just a QI. -- Colin (talk) 20:25, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:21, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles

File:Chaco chachalaca (Ortalis canicollis pantanalensis) head.JPG, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2015 at 10:50:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Info all by Charlesjsharp -- Charles (talk) 10:50, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charles (talk) 10:50, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kind of a curious bird? --Hubertl 14:30, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 14:33, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful headshot. Nicely executed. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:36, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:07, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:32, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 19:25, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 20:11, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support INeverCry 22:09, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Per Frank Schulenburg. Since it's a headshot, it's OK that the bird is less sharp beyond the neck, and the bokeh is in this instance rather pleasing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:32, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:21, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Frank. --Tremonist (talk) 14:05, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great light and clean background. The noise patterns in the background are a bit odd. — Julian H.^✈ 11:01, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support But per Julian, NR process seems a bit odd. --Laitche (talk) 14:59, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 18:23, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Hemerocallis 'Pink Damask'. Locatie De Kruidhof 01.JPG, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2015 at 11:52:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants #Family: Hemerocallidaceae.
Info created and uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Christian Ferrer --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:52, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:55, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Don´t you want to sign, Christian? --Hubertl 12:51, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

thank you --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:55, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support a wonderful work, really! --Hubertl 12:51, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:56, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 14:17, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thank you for nomination. Christian Ferrer ( talk).--Famberhorst (talk) 16:22, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Hubertl. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:30, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 19:24, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 20:08, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful. INeverCry 22:04, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely colors and detail. Daniel Case (talk) 03:44, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:05, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:45, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 20:47, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:26, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André (talk) 22:29, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:17, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants