User talk:Bgag/Archives 2015

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magnificent frigatebird (female) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:13, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galapagos hawk 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:13, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galapagos land iguana 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very fine details. --Palauenc05 20:07, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galapagos dove 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's passable, although the slight motion blur makes it a close one. --Ram-Man 23:24, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crocodylus niloticus in Lake Chamo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:53, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Termite mound, Ethiopia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 00:34, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lambayeque gold mask.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:21, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moche earrings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:19, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haci Bayram Mosque 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 18:30, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haci Bayram Mosque 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 18:30, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arslanhane Mosque 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:41, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arslanhane Mosque 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 07:29, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ethnography Museum of Ankara (exterior) SW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:49, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Changing of the Guard at Anıtkabir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Overall good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:43, 08 January 2015 (UTC

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minibus station, Ankara.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:48, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arslanhane Mosque, Ankara (exterior) North view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --Mile (talk) 16:10, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:49, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guard at Anıtkabir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:49, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anıtkabir, Ankara.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overall good quality. Can you please try to eliminate the slight barrel distortion of the building? --Cccefalon 06:02, 8 January 2015 (UTC)  Done Good observation. Should be OK now. Thanks. --Bgag 15:17, 8 January 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 21:08, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haci Bayram Cami Park 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:27, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

VI candidates

If you nominate your pictures to VI can you support pictures from other users, please? --Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:15, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haci Bayram Mosque, Ankara (exterior) West view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:16, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:51, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sphinx Gate, Alaca Höyük 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 17:56, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sphinx Gate, Alaca Höyük 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:55, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sphinx Gate, Alaca Höyük 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 09:23, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pavillion at Anıtkabir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Image needs perspective correction. The both walls of the building are not straight. --Halavar 22:40, 8 January 2015 (UTC) Done--Bgag 05:02, 9 January 2015 (UTC)  Support Good now. --Halavar 14:12, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal tombs, Alaca Höyük.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me. --Johann Jaritz 04:56, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! West postern, Alaca Höyük.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lion Gate, Hattusa 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:33, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lion Gate, Hattusa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:58, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haci Bayram Cami Park 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 00:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sphinx Gate, Alaca Höyük, Turkey SE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:34, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hittite pottery from Alaca Höyük.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:44, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hattusa-Lower City 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:49, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sphinx Gate, Hattusa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 19:05, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hattusa-Lower City 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:22, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hattusa - Hittite city wall 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:00, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alaca Höyük 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:28, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lion Gate, Hattusa 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:17, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lion Gate, Hattusa 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:17, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hattusa - Hittite city wall 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 06:04, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hattusa-Lower City 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 09:19, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orthostates, Alaca Höyük 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:51, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orthostates, Alaca Höyük 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:51, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lion Gate, Hattusa, Turkey.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:46, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sphinx Gate, Hattusa, Turkey.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:16, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 17:42, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
King's Gate, Hattusa, Turkey.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:18, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 17:42, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Gate, Hattusa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 16:16, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haci Bayram Cami Park 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 09:12, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orthostates, Alaca Höyük 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:01, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sphinx Gate, Alaca Höyük 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:39, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orthostates, Alaca Höyük 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Superbe qualité. --Johann Jaritz 04:28, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lion Gate, Hattusa 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:24, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sphinx Gate, Hattusa 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:43, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sphinx Gate, Alaca Höyük 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 16:28, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lion Gate, Hattusa 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:51, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lion Gate, Hattusa 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:50, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yerkapi, Hattusa 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Dnalor 01 17:13, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yerkapi, Hattusa 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:58, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yerkapi, Hattusa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Dnalor 01 17:11, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yazilikaya 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 15:19, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chamber A, Yazilikaya 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 15:19, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chamber A, Yazilikaya 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:31, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chamber A, Yazilikaya 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:13, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yazilikaya 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 18:57, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yazilikaya 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:33, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hattusa sign.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:06, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Göreme Open Air Museum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:06, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uçhisar Castle 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting and good quality. --Steindy 17:23, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uçhisar, Cappadocia 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 16:30, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uçhisar, Cappadocia 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 16:32, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape near Uçhisar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:26, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panoramic of Göreme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Would benefit from a bit more of sky at top. --Cayambe 08:19, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zelve, Cappadocia 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Primal landscape, good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:35, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison Alphonse Desjardins.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice architecture, good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:29, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Göreme 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 15:36, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uçhisar, Cappadocia 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:07, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uçhisar Castle 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:08, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape near Uçhisar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:24, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uçhisar Castle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The minaret in the background is leaning in --Uoaei1 17:33, 21 January 2015 (UTC)  Done Good observation. --Bgag 19:09, 21 January 2015 (UTC)  Support ok now --Uoaei1 07:07, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uçhisar, Cappadocia 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Great compostion, amazing topography. --Johann Jaritz 05:49, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zelve, Cappadocia 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Would be better with more sharpness of the landscape. --Halavar 23:26, 23 January 2015 (UTC)  Done Should be better now. --Bgag 02:23, 24 January 2015 (UTC)  Support Agree, better now. --Halavar 10:15, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zelve, Cappadocia 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:46, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zelve, Cappadocia 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality image --DKrieger 21:12, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zelve, Cappadocia 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 01:20, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hot air balloon on the ground.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 20:56, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zelve, Cappadocia 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:10, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zelve, Cappadocia 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:50, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zelve, Cappadocia 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:46, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lion Gate, Hattusa 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 16:36, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zelve, Cappadocia 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me. --Halavar 17:44, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hot air balloon in Cappadocia 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Villy Fink Isaksen 17:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uçhisar Castle 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 16:12, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Kızılırmak River in Avanos.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Kızılırmak River in Avanos.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:31, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aerial view of Uçhisar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:29, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hot air balloon on the ground in Cappadocia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:30, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Footbridge in Avanos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:07, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kızılırmak River in Avanos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Sharpness could be better, but IMO still QI. --XRay 16:57, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minaret in Avanos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments see note.--Famberhorst 16:31, 30 January 2015 (UTC)  Done. --Bgag 16:53, 30 January 2015 (UTC)Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:40, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zelve, Cappadocia 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO too bright at the bottom.--XRay 17:28, 29 January 2015 (UTC)  Done. --Bgag 20:52, 29 January 2015 (UTC)  Support OK now.--XRay 13:24, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avanos 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:17, 01 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soganli 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:55, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zelve, Cappadocia 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:26, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soganli 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Image needs more sharpness. --Halavar 15:47, 31 January 2015 (UTC)  Done --Bgag 00:08, 1 February 2015 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Halavar 11:50, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle de procession de la Sainte-Vierge, Beaumont, Québec SW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:29, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle de procession Sainte-Anne, Beaumont, Québec North view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:29, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soganli 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:47, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle de procession Saint-François-Xavier, Lévis, Québec North view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:55, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

• @Bgag - You must corrected tilt and perspektive. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:39, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Done. --Bgag (talk) 04:50, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle de procession de Saint-Gervais, Québec South view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:55, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Yilanli Kilise, Soğanlı, Turkey (exterior), West view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 21:09, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:21, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gare de l'Intercolonial à Lévis, Québec (exterior) NE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:47, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:21, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yilanli Kilise 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 00:56, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kubbeli Kilise 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 00:56, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kubbeli Kilise 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 00:23, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mustafapaşa, Nevşehir 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 00:23, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mustafapaşa, Nevşehir 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 16:55, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mustafapaşa, Nevşehir 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:29, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fortress of Kayseri, Turkey (exterior) East view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:51, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Door knocker, Mustafapaşa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Kraft 16:43, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bürüngüz Mosque 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 19:58, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Atatürk, Kayseri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:01, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fortress of Kayseri 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:33, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fortress of Kayseri - Lion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:40, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fortress of Kayseri 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, well composed. --DXR 16:26, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adiyaman, Turkey 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:34, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mustafapaşa, Nevşehir 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:40, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adiyaman, Turkey 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:10, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Necropolis of Perre 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful image.--Famberhorst 16:43, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Necropolis of Perre 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:26, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Necropolis of Perre 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:08, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tumulus of Karakus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:37, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tumulus of Karakus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 19:44, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tumulus of Karakus 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 19:58, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adiyaman, Turkey 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Now ;-) --Hubertl 08:03, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Necropolis of Perre 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 07:58, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tumulus of Karakus 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 18:07, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tumulus of Karakus 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:27, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tumulus of Karakus 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 16:47, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Necropolis of Perre 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 16:47, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tumulus of Karakus 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, --Hubertl 17:26, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tumulus of Karakus 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 15:08, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Severan Bridge, Turkey 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:22, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Severan Bridge, Turkey 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:36, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Severan Bridge, Turkey 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Wow! Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:41, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Severan Bridge, Turkey 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:47, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Severan Bridge, Turkey 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:36, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Severan Bridge, Turkey 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:46, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Severan Bridge, Turkey 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 19:48, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Severan Bridge, Turkey 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 19:50, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tumulus of Karakus 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition --Moroder 13:44, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Severan Bridge, Turkey NW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 15:23, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:28, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Severan Bridge, Turkey 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 17:39, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tumulus of Karakus 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 16:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nemrut Dağı 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Could it be, that the images which are skewed?--Famberhorst 06:00, 1 March 2015 (UTC) No I don't think so. --Bgag 16:38, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nemrut Dağı 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:53, 01 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nemrut Dağı 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 18:02, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nemrut Dağı 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:31, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nemrut Dağı 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:35, 03 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nemrut Dağı 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:42, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nemrut Dağı 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 18:47, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nemrut Dağı 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:45, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nemrut Dağı 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:20, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nemrut Dağı 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality image--DKrieger 17:09, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nemrut Dağı 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality image --DKrieger 17:06, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tumulus of Karakus 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:18, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Atatürk Dam, Turkey, South view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Picture is unsharp. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:06, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

I have made some improvement to the picture, but it is VI not QI. --Bgag (talk) 00:44, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:00, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nemrut Dağı 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 20:47, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nemrut Dağı 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:04, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rizvaniye Mosque 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:08, 08 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nemrut Dağı 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:14, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Directional road sign in Şanlıurfa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:46, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rizvaniye Mosque, Şanlıurfa, Turkey (exterior) SW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balikli Göl 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Charlesjsharp 10:07, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mevlid-i Halil Mosque 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:19, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mevlid-i Halil Mosque 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit oversharpened but ok --Poco a poco 20:20, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mevlid-i Halil Mosque 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 15:29, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mevlid-i Halil Mosque 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality.--Famberhorst 18:59, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mevlid-i Halil Mosque, Şanlıurfa, Turkey (exterior) North view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:06, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mevlid-i Halil Mosque 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:50, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Urfa Castle 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 16:07, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Urfa Castle 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 15:53, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Mevlid-i Halil Mosque 08.jpg

You uploaded Common's 25th million image. Congratulations! --Leoboudv (talk) 05:09, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment:

Your image is on this list of Quality Commons Milestone images. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:20, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Halfeti on the Euphrates.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:03, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fortress of Rumkale 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Famberhorst 16:39, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old Halfeti 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:46, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mosque of Halfeti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:30, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Halfeti, Turkey SE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fortress of Rumkale, Turkey.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sabancı Merkez Camii 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 16:51, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sabancı Merkez Camii 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:12, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fortress of Rumkale 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:22, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! We-Ko-Pa Golf Club (Saguaro) no 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:34, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Golf Club at Dove Mountain (Saguaro) no 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- ~~~~

Wiki Loves Earth 2015

Hello, You receive this message because we noticed your contributions relating to the Moroccan natural heritage. We would welcome you to participate in the contest Wiki Loves Earth, which aims to encourage the development of natural protected areas throughout the Wikimedia projects (mainly Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons media encyclopedia). The contest runs from 1 to 31 May 2015 and is open to all. Prizes will be awarded at the end. A question, a problem? Do not hesitate to leave a message on the discussion page of the event. See you soon, Reda benkhadra (d · c) For more details | Contact

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mevlana Müzesi 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 16:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mevlana Müzesi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:31, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alâeddin Mosque, Konya - Minaret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 16:01, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Türbe Kilij Arslan II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 15:27, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Türbe Yarim Kümbet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 08:25, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ince Minareli Medrese (exterior), Konya, Turkey East view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ince Minareli Medrese 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:13, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alâeddin Mosque, Konya 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 15:04, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aqueduct of Aspendos 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:36, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sultan Alaaddin Camii 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:34, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sultan Alaaddin Camii 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:32, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Golconda Fort 002 - Baradari.jpg

Bonjour Bernard, j'ai nominé cette image à FPC, des utilisateurs trouve l'image "oversharpened", pourrais tu jeter un coup d'oeil s'il te plait? bonne continuation -- Christian Ferrer 14:18, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

• Malheureusement je n'ai pas de verson "raw" de cette photo, mais je vais regarder ce que je peux faire. Merci de l'avoir mise en nomination. --Bgag (talk) 21:09, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kesik Minare 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 15:07, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadrian's Gate, Antalya 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 15:07, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yivli Minare Mosque 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me.--Johann Jaritz 04:06, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hadrian's Gate, Antalya 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:51, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hıdırlık Tower, Antalya, Turkey (South view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yivli Minare Mosque 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:48, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort No 1, Lévis - Canon Armstrong 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:42, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tekeli Mehmet Paşa Mosque 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 16:30, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Community mailboxes - Canada Post.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:05, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antalya Clock Tower 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hockei 06:11, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aqueduct of Aspendos 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tekeli Mehmet Paşa Mosque, Antalya, Turkey (exterior) North view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Picture have lens distortion, the tower isn't straight. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:37, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
 Done --Bgag (talk) 15:49, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:06, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:12, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hıdırlık Tower 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:47, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort No 1, Lévis - Canon Armstrong 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 13:57, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort No 1, Lévis - Canon Armstrong 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 14:49, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort No 1, Lévis - Casemates 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:48, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hilton Garden Inn, Konya.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hellenistic Tower (Perge).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 15:05, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Columns in Perge 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:39, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nymphaeum (Perge), Turkey (NE view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nympheaum of Hadrian (Perge) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:58, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancient Roman Corinthian Capital, Perge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:45, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lintel in Perge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 05:46, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Barbarossa Hayreddin Pasha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:15, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Columns in Perge 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:46, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Southern Baths, Perge 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could be more crisp. Perhaps somewhat too strong noise reduction? But good composition and well handled high contrasty lighting. --Smial 14:31, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Roman Gate (Perge), Turkey (South facace).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:49, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Roman Gate (Perge), Turkey (North facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:49, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poppy field, Turkey 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:38, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poppy field, Turkey 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 20:51, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Columns in Perge 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:14, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agora (Perge) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:02, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nymphaeum of Hadrian in Perge, Turkey, SW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 21:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Megalo Arsenali, Chania, Crete NE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Columns in Perge 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I don't see an issue here. --MB-one 13:54, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colonnade, Perge 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:16, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardo (Perge).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 15:11, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poppy field, Turkey 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:50, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poppy field, Turkey 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:50, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aphrodisias - Tetrapylon 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:02, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aphrodisias - Tetrapylon 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aphrodisias - Tetrapylon 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:00, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aphrodisias - Tetrapylon 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:33, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aphrodisias - Tetrapylon 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:05, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aphrodisias - Temple of Aphrodite 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Stunning photograph.--Johann Jaritz 14:35, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aphrodisias - Temple of Aphrodite 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thank you for these images.--Johann Jaritz 14:38, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aphrodisias - Temple of Aphrodite 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:53, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aphrodisias - Temple of Aphrodite 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:52, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sebastiani Theatre, Sonoma, California (exterior) NW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aphrodisias - Tetrapylon 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:29, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aphrodisias - Tetrapylon 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:48, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aphrodisias - Baths of Hadrian 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 14:04, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aphrodisias - Odeion 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 15:30, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aphrodisias - Tetrapylon 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! --Moroder 08:01, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aphrodisias - Baths of Hadrian 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 14:44, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aphrodisias - Baths of Hadrian 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportYes.--Jebulon 14:31, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aphrodisias - Tetrapylon 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:03, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aphrodisias - Portico of Tiberius 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:03, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aphrodisias - Portico of Tiberius 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:42, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aphrodisias - Roman Theatre 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:42, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sebasteion (Aphrodisias), Turkey (East view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aphrodisias - Portico of Tiberius 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:11, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sarcophagus in Aphrodisias.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:30, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aphrodisias - Portico of Tiberius 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:12, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aphrodisias - Sebasteion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:23, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aphrodisias - Stadium 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:58, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aphrodisias - Portico of Tiberius 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:58, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pamukkale 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:13, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pamukkale 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:14, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Domitian Gate, Hierapolis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:52, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica Baths, Hierapolis 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 19:04, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica Baths, Hierapolis 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pyb 19:49, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancient Roman theatre, Hierapolis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:09, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb in Hierapolis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:18, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gate in Hierapolis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Threatening. Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:22, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Necropolis of Hierapolis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:22, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Necropolis of Hierapolis 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:28, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Necropolis of Hierapolis 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 18:19, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple of Apollo, Didyma - Columns 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments it OK, even when my decisiion is weak. Third opinion appreciated --Hubertl 15:13, 19 July 2015 (UTC)  Comment Per Hubertl. --Johann Jaritz 16:15, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple of Apollo, Didyma 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:18, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple of Apollo, Didyma 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me. the shadows are pretty harsh. --Hubertl 14:31, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple of Apollo, Didyma - Columns 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:38, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple of Apollo, Didyma 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 15:39, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple of Apollo, Didyma 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:50, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple of Apollo, Didyma - Adyton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Sharpness could be better. --XRay 15:31, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Milet - Baths of Faustina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:35, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miletus - Ancient Greek theatre 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:35, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpet petrol station, Turkey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:05, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miletus - Ancient Greek theatre 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:33, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miletus - Ancient Greek theatre 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:33, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple of Apollo, Didyma - Columns 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 05:31, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ancient Greek theatre in Miletus, Turkey (exterior) SW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miletus - Ancient Greek theatre 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:15, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miletus - Ancient Greek theatre 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:15, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miletus - Ancient Greek theatre 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:10, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miletus - Ancient Greek theatre 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:57, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miletus - Ancient Greek theatre 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:58, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ephesus - Prytaneion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ephesus - Temple of Domitian 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ephesus - Temple of Domitian 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:42, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ephesus - Memmius Monument.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:42, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scholastikia Baths in Ephesus, Turkey (South view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heracles Gate in Ephesus, Turkey (SE view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ephesus - Scholastikia Baths.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:38, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ephesus - Terrace Houses.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:31, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ephesus - Celsus Library.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:31, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ephesus - Arcadiane Street 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:58, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica of St. John in Ephesus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:58, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica of St. John in Ephesus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:58, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ephesus - Ancient Greek theatre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:52, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:04, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica of St. John in Ephesus 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:43, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica of St. John in Ephesus 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:43, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica of St. John in Ephesus 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:49, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica of St. John in Ephesus 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:50, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica of St. John in Ephesus 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:04, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica of St. John in Ephesus 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:02, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kantar Karakolu, Izmir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:06, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Izmir 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:06, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica of St. John in Ephesus 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:47, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica of St. John in Ephesus 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:52, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:00, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple of Trajan, Pergamon 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:19, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple of Trajan, Pergamon 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:19, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple of Trajan, Pergamon 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:42, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple of Trajan, Pergamon 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:42, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poppy field, Turkey 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:21, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theatre of Pergamon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:18, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roman theatre at Pergamon Asclepium 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 20:38, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roman theatre at Pergamon Asclepium 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:25, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roman theatre at Pergamon Asclepium 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:13, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North Stoa at Pergamon Asclepium 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:14, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roman theatre at Pergamon Asclepium 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (DoF could be better.) --XRay 14:40, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roman theatre at Pergamon Asclepium 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:11, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sanctuary of Asclepius, Pergamon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:11, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ionic capital in Pergamon Asclepium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:04, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Via Tecta in Pergamon Asclepium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:10, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yeşil Türbe 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:15, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape Madagascar 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:17, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muradiye Complex 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:42, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Road sign in Bursa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:44, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yeşil Cami - Minaret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality (assuming that the tilt is for real) --Poco a poco 19:41, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muradiye Complex 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:41, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altar in Pergamon Asclepium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Ce truc bleu, en arrière-plan...--Jebulon 21:24, 23 August 2015 (UTC) Ça semble être une tente. On les aperçoit aussi sur cette photo en haut à droite: File:Sanctuary of Asclepius, Pergamon.jpg. --Bgag 22:24, 23 August 2015 (UTC)C'est franchement gênant. Tu crois pouvoir faire quelque chose ?--Jebulon 20:41, 25 August 2015 (UTC)  Done C'est réglé. --Bgag 13:30, 26 August 2015 (UTC)Pardon d'être si exigeant, mais le clonage est très visible..("repetitive pattern").--Jebulon 19:33, 26 August 2015 (UTC)  Done C'est vrai que ce n'était pas terrible. Ça devrait aller maintenant. --Bgag 22:51, 26 August 2015 (UTC) Support Oui, merci de ta ptience.--Jebulon 20:47, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:37, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church tower in Istanbul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:15, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blue Mosque (Istanbul).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:48, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Request from Brazil -

Dear Bernard I hope that you are very well. Please can you help me about this request? Editora Saraiva is a brazilian book publishing that has an interest in using this image in education book Geography We wonder if you authorize the use of the content, and how is the process for license? Thank you very much in advance and we look forward to hearing from you. If you need more information, please let me know. Information about the book for permission: Saraiva Editora Use in inside 1/8 page print and digital version Best Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcia Sato (talk • contribs) 16:38, 05 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi, what is the picture you are talking about? --Bgag (talk) 03:53, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

QI Tunisia training

As part of the project Quality images training in Tunisia, the Wikimedia TN user group is looking for a Wikimedia commons User able to organize a training about Quality images, featured pictures, Valued images and Graphic Lab/Photography in Tunisia from February 18th to 22th, 2016. To participate please fill this form --Touzrimounir (talk) 19:59, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thank you for being a brave kitten and traveling to Syria to take the photographs of the various cities of Syria.

Geraldshields11 (talk) 18:42, 5 January 2016 (UTC)