User talk:Halavar/Archive2

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parish church of St. John of Nepomuk in Pogwizdów, Poland. Exterior..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope.--XRay ^talk 08:14, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 00:35, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Baptist parish church in Pawłowice, Poland. Side view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:53, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 13:06, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of John the Baptist in Racibórz, Poland. Interior of main nave..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:40, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:28, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Racibórz, Poland. Interior of main nave..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:41, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 20:31, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Holy Cross in Cieszyn, Poland. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful (a little perspective distortion) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Dzięki!

Dzięki za pomoc, akceptuję poczynione przez Ciebie zmiany. Zdziwiło mnie, że mój post nie poszedł w niebyt - Jacek Halicki usunął tamto zdjęcie wraz z dyskusją. Trochę to pewnie jeszcze potrwa zanim się połapię co i jak ale mam zamiar się starać. W razie potrzeby będę Cię prosił o pomoc - na razie czytam pomoce i samouczki. --Sławomir Milejski (talk) 13:19, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint George in Jasienica, Poland. Exterior..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I think this one is better. Yann (talk) 18:33, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Kościół św. Jerzego w Jasienicy 4.JPG: +1
2. Kościół św. Jerzego w Jasienicy 8.JPG: -1

=>
File:Kościół św. Jerzego w Jasienicy 4.JPG: Promoted.
File:Kościół św. Jerzego w Jasienicy 8.JPG: Declined.

--Halavar (talk) 20:55, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Michael Archangel parish church in Krzyżowice, Poland. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:48, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:53, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Question

First- Thanks for your support on VIS. I could scan early Polish notes, my only concern is PD/copyright issues. The Bank of Poland retains copyright over their notes, but the ones I could scan are pre-20th century. Do you foresee any issues with notes that are at least 100 years old?-Godot13 (talk) 00:45, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parish church of Saints Apostles Peter and Paul in Skoczów, Poland. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:29, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 19:18, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Visitation in Kończyce Małe, Poland. Painting of Virgin Mary..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:02, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 18:55, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Outbuilding of the palace (officina) in Pszczyna, Poland..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:11, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hunting Palace of the Habsburgs, now State School of Music in Cieszyn, Poland. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Looks good. Yann (talk) 03:36, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 16:47, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Borynia in Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Poland. Exterior..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Looks good. Yann (talk) 03:40, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 00:02, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Templete

Do not use the template (Template:VI cat) because the category becoming hidden. Thank you for your work VI, its nice to see your involvement. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:54, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Kończyce Wielkie, Poland. Exterior..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support all criteria met. --P e z i (talk) 21:57, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:55, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former Habsburg Hunting Palace in Wisła, Poland. Exterior..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 20:42, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former small castle (hunting lodge) in Prstná, Czech Republic. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:18, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall in Skoczów, Poland. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Previous reviews

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 22:22, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Nicholas rotunda church in Cieszyn, Poland. Exterior..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in rich scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:19, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Studnia Trzech Braci 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:45, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Catherine of Alexandria and Providence of God church in Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Poland. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Previous reviews

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:08, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope.--Tonto II. (talk) 21:29, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 12:13, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wieża kościoła św. Anny w Ustroniu.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 05:30, , 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teatr w Cieszynie 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 05:53, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Adam Mickiewicz Theatre in Cieszyn, Poland. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Previous reviews

•  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Villa Dąbrówka in the Dąbrówka Park, Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Poland. Exterior..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 18:07, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:57, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Studnia Trzech Braci 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Nice but some fixable CAs on the roofs of the houses. --JLPC 18:35, 14 January 2014 (UTC)  Done I uploaded new fixed version. Halavar 22:45, 15 January 2014 (UTC) Better now ! --JLPC 11:42, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castle of the President of Poland (Upper Castle) in Wisła, Poland. Exterior..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 01:27, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castle in Racibórz, Poland. View from courtyard..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope imo. --JLPC (talk) 17:53, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:53, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stacja kolejowa Kúty.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:43, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pałac króla Mikołaja w Barze.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:39, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Raichle Palace in Subotica, Serbia. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 19:20, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Small palace in Bar, Montenegro. View from West..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:51, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:31, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Mala Rijeka railway viaduct in Montenegro.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 22:26, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Corregida categorizacion a foto que usted promovio a imagen de Calidad

Hola Halavar he corregido la categorizacion de la foto nominada, y ya promovida por usted a Imagen de Calidad; File:Sistema_de_regadio_circular.JPG, la cual estaba solo pendiente a realizarle una mejor categorizacion. Muchas gracias por su promocion a la misma. Un saludo afectuoso: Ivan2010

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Jerome in Herceg Novi, Montenegro. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:48, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Aurora w Herceg Novi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me, would've been a little nicer without obstructions. --Lewis Hulbert 16:39, 23 January 2014 (UTC)  Done Good tip, thanks a lot. --Halavar 16:58, 23 January 2014 (UTC) Oops, meant to write distractions. At least you knew what I meant. Lewis Hulbert 17:04, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amfiteatr rzymski w Durrës 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are some issues which prevent a promotion for me yet: 1. A tilt (observe the railing) 2. reddish CA 3. Halo over the upper left wall. All resolvable. However I'm still unsure about the lacking of details in the stones and about the composition. Concerning composition I proposed another crop (see annotation) which reduces boring parts of the photo and the open-to-the-right-border "hole" in the photo. Want to give it a try? --Cccefalon 13:24, 23 January 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the advice, I've made the crop you proposed and removed that reddish CA. Hope it's better now. --Halavar 13:48, 23 January 2014 (UTC) Ok, can pass as QI IMO --Cccefalon 16:53, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widoki z twierdzy Forte Mare na Herceg Novi 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments For QI, I request to apply a little bit denoising. The sky is on the verge to bear artefacts. --Cccefalon 06:44, 23 January 2014 (UTC)  Done You'r right, thanks for the tip. It's done. --Halavar 11:27, 23 January 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:59, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widoki z twierdzy Forte Mare na Herceg Novi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Bgag 15:07, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widoki Czarnogóry z pociągu na trasie Belgrad - Bar 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 05:42, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Realizada descripcion de localizacion y categorizacion del lugar del File:Sistema_de_regadio_circular.JPG.

Realizada una correcta descripcion de la localizacion y categorizacion del lugar del File:Sistema_de_regadio_circular.JPG. que usted promovio, acorde a la sugerencia de --Cayambe . Muchas Gracias nuevamente para usted --Ivan2010

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widoki z twierdzy Kanli Kula na Herceg Novi 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:32, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boka Kotorska w cieśninie Verige 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:13, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mury zamku w Kruji 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --EveryPicture 21:15, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół świętego Hieronima w Herceg Novi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 14:41, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Promenada nadmorska w Barze.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --EveryPicture 21:09, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kamienice na Placu Broni w Kotorze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:50, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widoki Czarnogóry z pociągu na trasie Belgrad - Bar 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Weak pro Good quality. --XRay 07:22, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Solo para comentarle y agradecerle

Hola Halavar, Solo unas letras para comentarle que el archivo: Sistema de regadio circular, , el cual usted fue el primero en promover a IQ, lo he nominado a: Candidato a Imagen Destacada, para que sea valorado también en esa categoría. Quería ponerlo en su conocimiento, porque apreciaría y agradecería mucho si usted considerara también emitir su opinión al respecto en ese ámbito. Muchas gracias y un saludo cordial. Ivan2010

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hotel Aurora in Herceg Novi, Montenegro. View from East..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:21, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Herceg Novi - View of the city from the harbor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 20:29, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

I am using an equal translation software to send this

Excuse me, I did not know it, I do not speak English either. I am using an equal translation software to send this. Only I hope that the software does its work as good as possible. Below my message for you: Hello Halavar , Only some letters to comment you than the file: Sistem de regadio circular.JPG , , which you were the first to promote IQ, I have nominated you to: Candidate to FP, in order that it is priced also in that category. He wanted to put it in your knowledge, because he would appreciate and he would thank a lot if you considered also to emit your opinion with regard to this matter in that space. Thank you very much and a cordial greeting. Ivan2010

I am using an again equal translation software to send this

Hello Halavar Thank You For his vote to favor on file: Sistema de regadio circular.JPG, , , which you were the first to promote IQ, Only I hope that this translation software helps to communicate us. Thanks again and a greeting: User : Ivan2010 | Ivan2010

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cytadela w obrębie murów miejskich w Kotorze 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:23, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół Św. Michała w Kotorze (detal).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments For a detail of that part of the church, I had suggested a more tighter crop at the bottom (about 1:1), but the quality is ok and it can go as QI. --Cccefalon 11:20, 27 January 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for a good advive, it's done. --Halavar 13:56, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na miasto z portu w Herceg Novi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO there is too much sky. Please have a look to the image.--XRay 07:48, 25 January 2014 (UTC)  You are right I uploaded new version with better crop. Hope it's better now. --Halavar 01:59, 27 January 2014 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:13, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ścieżka do Twierdzy Świętego Jana w Kotorze 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:02, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ścieżka do Twierdzy Świętego Jana w Kotorze 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 09:02, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cytadela w obrębie murów miejskich w Kotorze 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a reddish CA in the tree (fixable, see annotation). Also some magenta on the rocks on the left side; I'm not sure, if you can fix it, but it's worth a try. --Cccefalon 11:14, 27 January 2014 (UTC) After second look, I think, that in general, there is too much magenta in the photo (WB?), this should be easier to fix. --Cccefalon 11:15, 27 January 2014 (UTC)  Done I made WB correction and reduced to maximum magenta in the whole image. Also I fixed the reddish CA. Hope it's better now. Thanks for the suggestions. --Halavar 13:56, 27 January 2014 (UTC) It's better now and I can promote it. In general, you should observe the shadows in your photos; I noticed that they tend to slipp of to magenta. Might it be, that your monitor is not properly calibrated? --Cccefalon 08:15, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widoki z twierdzy Forte Mare na Herceg Novi 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:38, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widoki z twierdzy Forte Mare na Herceg Novi 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:38, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uliczka na starówce w Herceg Novi 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok I guess --Pleclown 12:27, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boka Kotorska w cieśninie Verige 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Pleclown 12:23, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dzwonnica kościoła św. Mikołaja w Peraście.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:02, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Północno-wschodnia część murów miejskich w Kotorze.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:07, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Continuum using the translation software by Ivan2010

Hello Halavar , continuum using the translation software that gave us to result to communicate us the previous time. I have decided to raise another photo, but ampler, of the Sistema de regadío circular, where it can look complete, I think that this team is of concern for agriculture, and besides have a good visual impact for his way, size and function, and that's why I decided to raise this image with another perspective, because I consider that I could be valid for the community when using it in some project. Besides I placed her candidate to IQ. I put it on your knowledge because I would appreciate a lot if you could happen by and to appraise it. Thank you very much for you. A greeting. Ivan2010

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kamienny lew i Zatoka Kotorska w Peraście 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:36, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Detale Sądu Rejonowego w Cieszynie.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alurín 15:43, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wyspa Matki Boskiej na Skale w Peraście 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overall good quality. However, there is a crop issue on the left border: After untilting you left a fine white brink. Re-crop is necessary. --Cccefalon 12:15, 30 January 2014 (UTC)}  Done You're right, thanks for the notice. I made a new crop. Halavar 15:22, 30 January 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:54, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na Perast od strony morza 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:31, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wyspa św. Jerzego w Peraście 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. You are improving ... --Cccefalon 18:14, 31 January 2014 (UTC) Indeed, a nice picture, a Featured Picture IMO --Christian Ferrer 19:49, 31 January 2014 (UTC) Thank you both, maybe I'm gonna nominate this image in FP. --Halavar 20:49, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wóz strażacki w Peraście.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs a bit perspective on the left --A.Savin 15:45, 31 January 2014 (UTC)  Done I uploaded new version with perspective correction. --Halavar 16:40, 31 January 2014 (UTC) OK. --A.Savin 17:12, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Museum in Perast, Montenegro. Exterior..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 19:52, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 18:30, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sanktuarium Opatrzności Bożej w Jastrzębiu-Zdroju 6.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --Iifar 07:09, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kamienny lew i Zatoka Kotorska w Peraście 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  weak pro Good quality and still QI. I would reduce the sky. --XRay 07:45, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mury miejskie w Kotorze 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wejście do Pałacu Prezydenckiego w Cetinje.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:00, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dworzec kolejowy w Czeskim Cieszynie 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Lewis Hulbert 17:59, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na Perast od strony morza 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. The sky is a little bit noisy, but IMO it's still QI. (If possible, please have a look to the noise in the sky.) --XRay 07:39, 2 February 2014 (UTC)  Done You're right, thanks for the tip. I uploaded new version with noise reduction of the sky. --Halavar 11:18, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sveti Đorđe Island, Perast, Montenegro. View from N-W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:12, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 00:57, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

From Ivan2010

Thank you very much for your vote in favor and your comment on my file. Sistema de regadío circular en toda su magnitud . , A cordial greeting. Ivan2010

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Court Church in Cetinje, Montenegro. Exterior..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:17, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 16:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mausoleum of Prince-Bishop Danilo I in Cetinje, Montenegro..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na Perast z zachodu 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Considerably better sharpness than in your other nomination. --Kreuzschnabel 19:35, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na Perast i Górę Kason z cieśniny Verige.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good! Keymeulen 19:02, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mury miejskie w Kotorze 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Wyspa św. Jerzego w Peraście 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wyspa św. Jerzego w Peraście 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Epiphany in Irkutsk, Siberia, Russia. Belfry..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Question it seems that the tower leans. Is it looked in reality? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment Hmm, hard to say. Look to the other images in the category, especially here: File:Богоявленский собор (Иркутск) 002.jpg. I think it's straight, but I'm not an expert. So, you should decide. Halavar (talk) 11:37, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support I think it leans more images seems to show. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:30, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Archive2⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cerkiew Podwyższenia Krzyża Pańskiego w Irkucku 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:20, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel on the site of the Kazan Cathedral in Irkutsk, Siberia, Russia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:42, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Building of Cinema "Art" in Irkutsk, Siberia, Russia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:01, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:28, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Exaltation of the Cross in Irkutsk, Siberia, Russia. Details of facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:28, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na miasto z parku w Irkucku.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 20:26, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

File:Pomnik rewolucjonistów w Irkucku.JPG

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument to revolutionaries in Irkutsk, Siberia, Russia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

I hope we will not have FoP problems, as there is no FoP in Russia. --Jebulon (talk) 20:58, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

I do not know when it was built this monument. Halavar (talk) 21:19, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Baikal National University of Economics and Law in Irkutsk, Siberia, Russia. Exterior..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:15, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 17:33, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cerkiew Kazańska w Irkucku 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cerkiew Kazańska w Irkucku 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cerkiew Kazańska w Irkucku 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Pomnik rewolucjonistów w Irkucku.JPG

File:Pomnik rewolucjonistów w Irkucku.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A.Savin 09:59, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Willa Lorenczyków w Jabłonkowie 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality image. --DAJF 15:27, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Our Lady of Kazan Church in Irkutsk, Siberia, Russia. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Agree with Archaeodontosaurus. Nev1 (talk) 19:59, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 00:45, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

First issue (1794) banknotes of Poland

Hi Halavar- Just back from my trip to the Smithsonian. I put a few notes together you might find interesting...New valued image set nominations.-Godot13 (talk) 03:48, 2 March 2014 (UTC) That is a great information! Thanks for your work, I appreciate it very much. Of course I supported your nomination:) Halavar (talk) 17:28, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cerkiew Kazańska w Irkucku 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bien para mi, aunque estuviese mejor sin el automovil y los fragmentos del banco y el sesto en los bordes inferiores. --Ivan2010 15:26, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaplica na miejscu Kazańskiego Soboru Katedralnego w Irkucku 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Chroma noise in the shadowy parts of the building, and the entire pic looks a bit oversaturated. --Kreuzschnabel 16:35, 25 February 2014 (UTC)  Info New version uploaded, hope it's better now. --Halavar 22:09, 27 February 2014 (UTC) Much better! --Kreuzschnabel 19:14, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sąd Rejonowy w Cieszynie 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:56, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plac Czerwony 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Minor CAs, but good detail IMO--Lmbuga 12:33, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Państwowe Muzeum Historyczne w Moskwie 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:49, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baszta Nikolska w Moskwie.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:53, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello! I appeal to you for help! Would very much like to participate in the evaluation of work, but in Quality images candidates / candidate list I'm doing something wrong. Tell me if you do not complicate, where to start?--Жанетта Багаджиян (talk) 09:35, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

I think you should send a message to User:A.Savin. He is administrator on Commons and also he is a Russian. Halavar (talk) 11:38, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathedral of the Theotokos of Kazan. Red Square, Moscow. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:14, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
State Historical Museum in Moscow. View from the Red Square..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 08:39, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 21:46, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baszta Spasska i Plac Czerwony.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 22:18, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delegatura NFZ w Rybniku 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality (Only a bit dot easy to clone out : see note, please). --JLPC 22:43, 7 March 2014 (UTC)  Done Pink dot removed in both images. Thanks for the hint --Halavar 23:07, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delegatura NFZ w Rybniku 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:43, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dawny ratusz w Rybniku 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:29, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brama cmentarza ewangelicko-augsburskiego w Cieszynie.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 22:09, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sobór Kazańskiej Ikony Matki Bożej w Moskwie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:39, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok z Listwianki na jezioro Bajkał 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 17:39, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Detal klasztoru Bonifratów w Cieszynie.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Better --Poco a poco 18:02, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cerkiew Kazańska w Irkucku 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --A.Savin 14:16, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cerkiew św. Łukasza w Kotorze 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 23:54, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

QI nominations

Hi Halavar,
please put empty lines between your QI-nominations. Cheers, --P e z i (talk) 20:10, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drewniana architektura i parasolka w Listwiance 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:43, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ulica Gorkiego w Listwiance 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:30, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dwór „Ludwikówka” w Pszczynie 5.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done CA removed. Thanks for the hint. --Halavar 19:25, 8 March 2014 (UTC)Better. --JLPC 09:08, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brama Zmartwychwstania na Placu Czerwonym w Moskwie 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems ok to me. --Mattbuck 23:37, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ulica Gorkiego w Listwiance.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sky is noisy. I've added an image note. Other than that, it's a great picture. Halavar, please get back to me via my talk page as soon as the issue is fixed. Then I would be more than willing to promote this image. --Arctic Kangaroo 15:03, 10 March 2014 (UTC)~  Done Fixed version uploaded --Halavar 15:49, 10 March 2014 (UTC) Nomination is currently on hold. I will review the improved version on the computer in a few hours. Halavar, thanks for your patience. Arctic Kangaroo 16:05, 10 March 2014 (UTC)  Support Great. :) Certain parts of the picture are overexposed, but I think that's only normal under the bright midday sun. You may fix that if you want. Anyways, the photo is awesome overall. Promote. --Arctic Kangaroo 00:37, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drewniany dom w Listwiance 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 21:05, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drewniany dom w Listwiance 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:03, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drewniana architektura w Irkucku 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:12, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drewniana architektura w Irkucku 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 13:18, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klasztor boromeuszek w Cieszynie.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --JLPC 18:26, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Przed mini-zoo w Listwiance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 13:14, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drewniany dom w Listwiance 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:58, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! GUM w Moskwie.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:58, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cerkiew na Ćipurze w Cetinje 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Better --Poco a poco 20:50, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół ewangelicko-augsburski apostołów Piotra i Pawła w Wiśle 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:47, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Figura Jonasza i Ratusz w Skoczowie 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:48, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drewniany dom w Listwiance 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The WB could be improved; there is a lot of blue in the white boards. --Cccefalon 06:25, 12 March 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint. I uploaded new fixed version with better WB. --Halavar 09:30, 12 March 2014 (UTC) can pass as QI IMO --Cccefalon 06:52, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drewniany dom w Listwiance 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 13:00, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drewniany dom w Listwiance 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:40, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół Trójcy Przenajświętszej w Palowicach1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Cccefalon 17:08, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół św. Józefa w Zabrzegu 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:23, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół św. Józefa w Zabrzegu 5.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Cccefalon 14:59, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół Wszystkich Świętych w Pszczynie 8.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:17, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na Listwiankę i jezioro Bajkał 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Finally we get the true colours of lake Baikal and a good white balance :) Congrats, it's good quality and QI. --Cccefalon 15:10, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drewniana architektura w Irkucku 33.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turecka Altana (Srebrna Altana) w Liwadii.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:34, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół Opatrzności Bożej w Jaworzu (witraż 2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 15:03, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół par. pw. NSPJ w Jastrzębiu-Zdroju1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nabrzeże Lenina w Jałcie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment : some slight CAs, easy to fix imo, especially around some people, bath towels ans street-lights. --JLPC 21:39, 17 March 2014 (UTC)-  Done New fixed version uploaded. --Halavar 22:57, 17 March 2014 (UTC) Better now. --JLPC 18:26, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na Jałtę ze statku 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 22:50, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park pałacowy w Liwadii 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:32, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pałac w Liwadii 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:40, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na Jałtę ze statku 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Arctic Kangaroo 11:44, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na Jałtę ze statku 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Arctic Kangaroo 11:44, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na Jałtę ze statku 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Noisy. --Arctic Kangaroo 06:19, 20 March 2014 (UTC) Never mind that. Good quality overall. --Arctic Kangaroo 11:41, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na Jałtę ze statku 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Noise, CAs, dust spots. --Arctic Kangaroo 06:19, 20 March 2014 (UTC) Dust spots removed. As for the noise and CA - I do not see it. --Halavar 10:51, 20 March 2014 (UTC) I'm not completely sure it's CA, but anyway I added notes. Could be from sharpening. As for the noise, never mind, I changed my mind. I changed the first image from Decline to Promote fyi. --Arctic Kangaroo 11:41, 20 March 2014 (UTC)  Info New version uploaded. CA (or something to might be CA) removed. Hope it looks better now. --Halavar 12:57, 20 March 2014 (UTC)  Support Much better now. ;) --Arctic Kangaroo 13:51, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helikopter nad jeziorem Bajkał.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok I guess --Pleclown 12:37, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turkish Arbor (Silver Arbor) in Livadia, Crimea..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 18:18, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:48, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Halavar,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:58, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Łódź widziana ze statku w Gasprze.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na Jałtę ze statku 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sky might be improved imo, QI anyway. --JLPC 18:33, 24 March 2014 (UTC)  Done You're right, thanks for the hint. I uploaded new version with denoised sky --Halavar 19:31, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na Jałtę ze statku 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Bien para mi--Ivan2010 14:46, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nabrzeże Lenina w Jałcie 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:38, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaskółcze Gniazdo widziane ze statku 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:50, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaskółcze Gniazdo widziane ze statku 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Interesting but could you add a tot of sharpness, please ? --JLPC 19:08, 25 March 2014 (UTC)  Done Agree, sharpness added. You were right, looks better. --Halavar 19:23, 25 March 2014 (UTC) Better now. --JLPC 22:19, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dawny ratusz w Rybniku 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sky needs denoising. Perspective overdone; the verticals are leeaning out. --Cccefalon 10:33, 25 March 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review. You're right. I uploaded new fixed version. Hope it's better now. --Halavar 10:50, 25 March 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:56, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skały widziane ze statku w Gasprze 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:44, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na Gasprę ze statku 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Magenta in the mountains could be a little bit reduced, but it is good for QI. --Cccefalon 21:54, 26 March 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint. --Halavar 22:22, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na Gasprę ze statku 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:26, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na szczyt Aj-Petri ze statku 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective correction necessary. --Cccefalon 13:24, 27 March 2014 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint --Halavar 19:57, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na szczyt Aj-Petri ze statku 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 06:41, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół pw. Matki Boskiej Bolesnej w Rybniku 7.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 05:30, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na szczyt Aj-Petri z dziedzińca pałacu w Ałupce.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 22:29, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Nawsie, Polska szkoła podstawowa 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A slight perspective correction is needed imo : the lower part of the roof is leaning on the left. --JLPC 15:44, 28 March 2014 (UTC)  Done New version uploaded. Hope it's better now. --Halavar 11:49, 29 March 2014 (UTC)  Support : yes, it is ! (Sorry for the delay) --JLPC 17:19, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pałac Myśliwski Habsburgów w Cieszynie 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for QI --Martin Kraft 22:49, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół św. Jerzego w Puńcowie 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Jbribeiro1 00:03, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół św. Jakuba w Raciborzu 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:30, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nabrzeże Lenina w Jałcie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:25, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Pawłowicach 6.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:55, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kamienny lew na dziedzińcu pałacu w Ałupce.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:02, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Letnia kawiarenka w Jastrzębiu-Zdroju6.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:16, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drewniany dom w Bolszych Kotach 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 04:55, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Nawsie, Polska szkoła podstawowa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jbribeiro1 23:16, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Figura Jonasza i Ratusz w Skoczowie 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:19, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fasada ratusza w Skoczowie 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 21:40, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ewangelicko-augsburski kościół św. Trójcy w Skoczowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 21:40, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drewniany dom w Bolszych Kotach 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 21:40, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drewniany dom w Bolszych Kotach 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 11:55, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Nawsie, Urząd gminy 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:52, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pomnik straconych w Parku pod Wałką.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you remove the magenta CA? If possible, a little bit more space at the bottom would be great. --Cccefalon 18:06, 6 April 2014 (UTC)  Info Firs thing - done:) As for the second one - sorry, I can't add more space... Even so, hope it's better now. --Halavar 18:17, 6 April 2014 (UTC) Not 100% but can pass as QI IMO --Cccefalon 18:49, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pomnik Legionistów Polskich w Jabłonkowie 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Cccefalon 10:26, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drewniany dom w Bolszych Kotach 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Malchen53 12:29, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Okna w drewnianym domu w Bolszych Kotach.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:07, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na Bolszyje Koty 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 21:21, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na Bolszyje Koty 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 20:58, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drewniany dom i stary pojazd w Bolszych Kotach.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK, but isn't it a bulldozer ? --JLPC 08:45, 7 April 2014 (UTC)  Comment Of course, you're right. I forgot that name in English. Thanks for the remind me of that:) --Halavar 18:06, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drewniany dom w Bolszych Kotach 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:49, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 Pierstna, Pałacyk myśliwski.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:57, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół św. Jerzego w Dębieńsku 5.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 19:35, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok na Bolszyje Koty i Bajkał.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:41, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drewniany dom w Bolszych Kotach 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:45, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drewniany dom w Bolszych Kotach 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:59, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drewniany dom w Bolszych Kotach 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support very good --A.Savin 09:23, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument dedicated to the "victims of the Hitlerites". Cieszyn-Błogocice, Poland..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 20:10, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pomnik Legionistów Polskich w Jabłonkowie 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:50, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pałac Myśliwski Habsburgów w Cieszynie 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:03, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statek na brzegu jeziora Bajkał w Bolszych Kotach.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 16:44, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rynek Mariacki w Jabłonkowie 7.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:59, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Luke church in Kotor, Montenegro. View from south..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:56, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ship Voskhod-59 (built in 1988).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 13:53, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:56, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rynek Mariacki w Jabłonkowie 9.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:05, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół Opatrzności Bożej w Jaworzu (witraż 1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:05, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zamek w Dzięgielowie 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Malchen53 08:12, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dwór w Bażanowicach 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 14:16, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bazylika św. Antoniego w Rybniku 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:29, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baszta więzienna w Raciborzu 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Do you think perspective at the wall is correct? Or is the wall not straight? There is a remarkable brightness variation on the sky (lower right part vs. upper left part), I guess due to usage of polarizing filter, right? --Tuxyso 10:49, 12 April 2014 (UTC)  Comment You're right on both: the wall is not straight and I'm using polarizing filter. --Halavar 11:14, 12 April 2014 (UTC) Barely OK for QI. --Tuxyso 11:30, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół św. Michała Archanioła w Krzyżowicach 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:03, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wodolot w Bolszych Kotach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:36, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drewniany dom w Bolszych Kotach 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 15:46, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kamienica, Rynek 16 w Skoczowie.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:39, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Narodowy Teatr Dramatyczny w Ułan Bator.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo.--ArildV 08:02, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ulica w centrum Ułan Bator 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good now. --Berthold Werner 16:34, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
National Drama Theatre in Ulan Bator, Mongolia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

isn't this one better ? --Jebulon (talk) 19:13, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

•  Support I think this image is the best one in scope, although the cars are slightly distracting. However, the billboard on the other picture is distracting much more. Good thing also is that the sign with the name of the theatre is visible here. Jan Kameníček (talk) 15:54, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View of "Třinec Iron and Steel Works" from Horní Líštná, Třinec, Czech Republic.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orkiestra mongolskiej armii na placu Suche Batora w Ułan Bator 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Cccefalon 18:54, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orkiestra mongolskiej armii na placu Suche Batora w Ułan Bator 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 08:13, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orkiestra mongolskiej armii na placu Suche Batora w Ułan Bator 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok. However, I would not use ISO400 in full sunlight. Your photos of static motifs can be much better with ISO 100. --Cccefalon 06:11, 27 April 2014 (UTC) Thanks. Of course you're right. I've made a mistake 4 years ago, when I did that image:( --Halavar 09:10, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orkiestra mongolskiej armii na placu Suche Batora w Ułan Bator 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:25, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orkiestra mongolskiej armii na placu Suche Batora w Ułan Bator 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support bit of CA, but OK I guess. --A.Savin 09:42, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kompania honorowa na schodach parlamentu podczas święta Naadam w Ułan Bator 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment : could you reduce the highlights a bit please ? --JLPC 16:46, 27 April 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for the hint. I uploaded new, fixed version. --Halavar 09:37, 28 April 2014 (UTC) Better now. --JLPC 16:35, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festiwal Naadam na stadionie narodowym w Ułan Bator 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --Cccefalon 17:53, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festiwal Naadam na stadionie narodowym w Ułan Bator 27.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:22, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festiwal Naadam na stadionie narodowym w Ułan Bator 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality - though I cannot see a compositorial idea behind the photo, I want to promote it because of it's EV. --Cccefalon 17:48, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festiwal Naadam na stadionie narodowym w Ułan Bator 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'm not sure the WB is OK (easy to fix). --JLPC 16:15, 3 May 2014 (UTC)  Done New version uploaded, hope it's better now. --Halavar 17:41, 3 May 2014 (UTC) Better now. --JLPC 18:05, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festiwal Naadam na stadionie narodowym w Ułan Bator 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 06:52, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok z Listwianki na jezioro Bajkał 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice photo, however have a look to my annotations; there is a general issue that needs your attention. --Cccefalon 15:33, 4 May 2014 (UTC)  Done You were right, thanks for the help. I uploaded new, fixed version. Hope it's better now (personally it's my favourite image from Lake Baikal) --Halavar 18:13, 4 May 2014 (UTC) Well done! It's really a great photo and QI. --Cccefalon 19:28, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festiwal Naadam na stadionie narodowym w Ułan Bator 29.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:30, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festiwal Naadam na stadionie narodowym w Ułan Bator 39.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good! --Cccefalon 15:30, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festiwal Naadam na stadionie narodowym w Ułan Bator 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:46, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

I would like to have your review to one of my shots

Hello Halavar, I have seen your QI-review on File:Tulip garden in Istanbul.JPG and I kindly ask you to take a look at my shot File:Botanical_garden_Bamberg.jpg. I would be happy to have your opinion about this photo in QI-Consensual review, because it has some common point to the one you promote (lots of flowers, strong color, limitation in DoF). Friendly greetings from Germany to Poland --J. Lunau (talk) 17:35, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I can not support your image, its is blurred to much and there is too low sharpness level. Halavar (talk) 17:51, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your review, it is always helpful to have the opinion of good photographers like you. I am aware of the DoF problem in this photo, but I have no idea, how to do higher quality under the given circumstances. I see other shots in QI with even lower sharpness level promoted. Regards --J. Lunau (talk) 11:43, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mongolskie zapasy na stadionie w Ułan Bator 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:24, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mongolskie zapasy na stadionie w Ułan Bator 25.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 10:07, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mongolskie zapasy na stadionie w Ułan Bator 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:12, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mongolskie zapasy na stadionie w Ułan Bator 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 07:40, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Translation

Hi Halavar-

Thanks for the comment on the QI image, I made the rotation correction.

I am going to nominate this this image for featured picture in connection with its use in Polish Zloty. I wondered, if you have the time, if you could translate the image description into Polish. Many thanks-Godot13 (talk) 23:35, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Of course, thanks for let me know about that image of polish note. Good work! Please let me know when you gonna nominate that images of FP, so I will support it. Best regards, Halavar (talk) 09:49, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks Halavar! I will let you know when I nominate it (probably in about 5-7 days or so).--Godot13 (talk) 17:04, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

• Hi Halavar - I have posted the 1794 Polish Banknote here and am letting you know at your request. Many thanks--Godot13 (talk) 04:02, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festiwal Naadam na stadionie narodowym w Ułan Bator 32.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 22:48, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festiwal Naadam na stepie na obrzeżach Ułan Bator 22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Malchen53 19:27, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festiwal Naadam na stepie na obrzeżach Ułan Bator 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --Cccefalon 04:48, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festiwal Naadam na stepie na obrzeżach Ułan Bator 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:41, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festiwal Naadam na stepie na obrzeżach Ułan Bator 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:47, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festiwal Naadam na stepie na obrzeżach Ułan Bator 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:16, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festiwal Naadam na stepie na obrzeżach Ułan Bator 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too low focal length for my taste, but still ok --Poco a poco 08:09, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festiwal Naadam na stepie na obrzeżach Ułan Bator 30.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 20:24, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festiwal Naadam na stepie na obrzeżach Ułan Bator 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --A.Savin 14:46, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festiwal Naadam na stepie na obrzeżach Ułan Bator 32.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:14, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festiwal Naadam na stepie na obrzeżach Ułan Bator 34.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:47, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festiwal Naadam na stepie na obrzeżach Ułan Bator 28.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --JLPC 15:10, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

My assessment of your QI candidates

"Lenin embankment" Clouds and colors look fine

Some parts of the clouds aren't modeled at all.

Strange colors

Hi Halavar, I'm a little puzzled about your uploads from Mongolia. On this talk page, I can see that you have uploaded many pictures with good colors. As an example I placed "Lenin embankment" at the right side: The clouds are beautifully modelled, although they're in the plain sun. In contrast to this, in File:Festiwal Naadam na stepie na obrzeżach Ułan Bator 26.JPG some parts of the clouds are almost flat white. You may find some tonal values in the white parts, but that's not actually visible. The new version you uploaded is hardly different. Also, in many of your mongolian pictures, the colors seem off. File:Festiwal Naadam na stepie na obrzeżach Ułan Bator 02.jpg looks like you had processed it with some retro filter to make it look special. Here too, your second version doesn't change much. When I darken the picture, the cloud on the left side horizon becomes green. In File:Festiwal Naadam na stepie na obrzeżach Ułan Bator 29.JPG large parts of the sky are yellow.
After recalibrating my monitor, I changed my assessment of File:Jurty w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż.JPG to "Promotion", although I don't believe that the picture looks naturally: You don't need that bright tonal values in the jurtes' roofs when they stand in the shadow and are not made of perfect white material. Since these issues mostly affect your latest uploads, I'm wondering whether there might be a new technical problem on your side. Regards, --Sitacuisses (talk) 22:42, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festiwal Naadam na stepie na obrzeżach Ułan Bator 35.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:11, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festiwal Naadam na stepie na obrzeżach Ułan Bator 36.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 10:40, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Holy Mandylion in Irkutsk, Russia. Iconostasis..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:00, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:53, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krajobraz w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not too sharp but good compo imo. --JLPC 16:21, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krajobraz w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Heuschrecke 11:49, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jurty w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:57, 17 May 2014 (UTC)  Oppose Like in many of Halavar's images, there's an unnatural color cast. --Sitacuisses 14:56, 17 May 2014 (UTC)  Comment Once again, you're wrong and you're overreacting. --Halavar 17:52, 17 May 2014 (UTC) After reconsideration: a little overprocessed but still acceptable. --Sitacuisses 21:37, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krajobraz w Parku Narodowym Gorchi-Tereldż 31.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --JLPC 17:09, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festiwal Naadam na stadionie narodowym w Ułan Bator 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}