User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive10

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Plebiania w Przyłęku, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please check WB. IMO it's too blue.--XRay 08:40, 4 April 2015 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 16:50, 4 April 2015 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:32, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Overpass in Lewin Kłodzki, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Nikon D7100 z lampą Aputure.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:03, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Obiektyw lustrzany MC MTO-11CA (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:35, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Złącza SATA w dysku SSD.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:35, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Tipsy (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:59, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Tipsy (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:00, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Wiadukt w Lewinie Kłodzkim (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:24, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 09:30, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 09:30, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 09:30, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Karta microSD z adapterem SD.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:36, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wodna Gate in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, interior of passage.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support ok for me -- Christian Ferrer 17:09, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wodna Gate in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, latrine bay.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, sgraffito.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Okrzei Street in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, stuccos.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
7 Wolności Square in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:47, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 14:06, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
11 Wolności Square in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:22, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 14:07, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel of St. Anthony of Padua in Gorzanów, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 14:08, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Folwark in the Gorzanów Castle complex.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 16:50, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 14:11, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Joseph church in Międzygórze, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:14, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:28, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Wiadukt w Lewinie Kłodzkim (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:39, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, klasztor, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:39, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, klasztor, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 12:29, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 10:36, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 59.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:39, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
6 Market Square in Duszniki-Zdrój, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:15, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Lawrence church in Stary Waliszów, pulpit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 16:40, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

v

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel of the Holy Trinity in Duszniki-Zdrój, entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 29.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 29.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 27.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:28, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 28.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:02, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 30.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:28, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 31.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:39, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spa Park in Duszniki-Zdrój, Jan Kazimierz Sanatorium, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Market Square in Duszniki-Zdrój, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Market Square in Duszniki-Zdrój, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Anthony in Wójtówka, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Anthony in Wójtówka, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
9 Market Square in Duszniki-Zdrój, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:43, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Overpass in Lewin Kłodzki, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:17, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:19, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wzgórza Lewińskie, Gomoła.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:17, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:20, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Polish Catholic church of Our Lady of the Rosary in Duszniki-Zdrój, entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:18, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:20, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spa Park in Duszniki-Zdrój, Parkowa caffe.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:21, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 34.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 08:56, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 37.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:52, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 38.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:49, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 43.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:50, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Anthony in Gołogłowy, entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:44, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Anthony in Gołogłowy, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cemetery chapel in Jaszkowa Dolna, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:41, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cemetery chapel in Jaszkowa Dolna, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 06:56, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:41, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4 Łukasiewicza Street in Kłodzko, Saint Aloysius Gonzaga relief.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support -- Christian Ferrer 08:21, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:42, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Franciscan monastery in Kłodzko, corner tower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:53, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:42, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Dominikańska 6 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:37, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ratusz 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:40, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ratusz 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:40, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Kłodzko, Franz de la Noble epitaph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Franciscan monastery in Kłodzko, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Browar Tarnowskich 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 11:40, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Browar Tarnowskich 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --ArildV 12:41, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Browar Tarnowskich 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:00, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Browar Tarnowskich 22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:00, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Browar Tarnowskich 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:26, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 33.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:42, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Protected QI candidate page

Hi. Can you please explain why the Project Page has been protected since yesterday (no edits are possible), yet some nominators are still posting QI candidate images and voting on them. Thank you. --Charles (talk) 09:33, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:18, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:08, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:42, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Mickiewicza 19 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO contrast could be better.--XRay 11:06, 12 April 2015 (UTC) What does it mean "better". Be exactly what you mean. --Jacek Halicki 12:46, 13 April 2015 (UTC)  Comment Better means that black within the shadow should be black. Not there is everything gray. I know, shadows are very difficult. Often a building with large parts of shadows aren't a good composition.--XRay 16:59, 13 April 2015 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 17:36, 13 April 2015 (UTC) Weak  Support Better and acceptable for QI, but too much shadows are still not a good choice.--XRay 16:02, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Mickiewicza 19 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO contrast could be better.--XRay 11:06, 12 April 2015 (UTC) What does it mean "better". Be exactly what you mean. --Jacek Halicki 12:46, 13 April 2015 (UTC)  Comment Please see the image before.--XRay 16:59, 13 April 2015 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 17:36, 13 April 2015 (UTC)Weak  Support Better and acceptable for QI, but too much shadows are still not a good choice.--XRay 16:02, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
First High School in Kłodzko, arcades interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 13:53, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Kłodzko, Getsemani chapel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Kłodzko, refiel in Getsemani chapel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support -- Christian Ferrer 04:54, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Garden on Łukasiewicza Street in Kłodzko, entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Garden on Łukasiewicza Street in Kłodzko, veraicon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Our Lady of the Rosary church in Kłodzko, nave.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The link should be Category:Interior of Our Lady of the Rosary church in Kłodzko. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:08, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment Agree. The link should goes there, where the image is, so it means to the category of the image. --Halavar (talk) 19:28, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:06, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Our Lady of the Rosary church in Kłodzko, side altar of Saint John of Nepomuk.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 15:06, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
First High School in Kłodzko, corridor on the first floor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Baroque Gate on Kościelny Square in Kłodzko, statue of St. Ignatius of Loyola.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good and useful. Yann (talk) 19:04, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
City tunnels tourist route in Kłodzko, bread oven.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Armii Krajowej Street in Kłodzko, knight sculpture.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Geocoding needed. Yann (talk) 19:09, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 07:59, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Good. Yann (talk) 09:34, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Pawłowskiego 14, muzeum 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 09:26, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:23, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:23, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 09:27, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 26.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:10, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Tarnobrzeg - interior, altars.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good and useful. Yann (talk) 19:13, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:52, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
6 Armii Krajowej Street in Kłodzko, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:52, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
31 Armii Krajowej Street in Kłodzko, pilasters.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:25, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:54, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, stucco with coat of arms of Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:54, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Mielec, ul. Rochowska, kaplica Boguszów, 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly tilted cw. Otherwise good. --Cccefalon 09:26, 16 April 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 21:24, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Mielec, ul. Rochowska, kaplica Boguszów, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:05, 16 April 2015 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 18:51, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Mielec, ul. Rzochowska, kapliczka I 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 12:07, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coats of arms of Kłodzko, coat of arms on the town hall in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Don't you think that the link should be to Category:Coats of arms of Kłodzko? Yann (talk) 19:06, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:00, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:02, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, portals.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:06, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
12 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:07, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
13 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, bay windows.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:08, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
15 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:55, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:08, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
15 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, terrace in front of the house.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:08, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
35 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:08, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
36 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:57, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 11:08, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Mielec, ul. Rzochowska, kapliczka II 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Σπάρτακος 12:06, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, stare miasto 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:13, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca kłodzka, ul. Słowackiego 00.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. But they have to paint their roof windows. -- Spurzem 08:13, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Michała Archanioła w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:15, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Mielec, ul. Rzochowska, kapliczka I 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done--Jacek Halicki 22:19, 16 April 2015 (UTC) Good quality--lmbuga 21:51, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, kordegarda 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 23:33, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, kordegarda 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 23:33, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Gomoła 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments *  Support the composition is something like strange to me, Jacek, I don´t understand the subject really, but technically it´s ok.--Hubertl 13:21, 17 April 2015 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 22:06, 17 April 2015 (UTC)Good quality. --Hubertl 00:43, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Captions in VI

hi, Jacek

You have a problem with the captions. Several images have the same legend. Heals a little this and it will be perfect. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
14 Braci Gierymskich Street in Kłodzko, lion sculpture.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4-6 Grunwaldzka Street in Kłodzko, entrance to the number 4 building.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4-6 Grunwaldzka Street in Kłodzko, entrance to the number 6 building.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main Post Office in Kłodzko, sculptures.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main Post Office in Kłodzko, side portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 05:59, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pierścienie pośrednie do Nikona 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 09:36, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pierścienie pośrednie do Nikona 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:35, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Międzygórze, kościół św. Józefa 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:30, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Międzygórze, kościół św. Józefa 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:34, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Międzygórze, kościół św. Józefa 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:07, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
6 Armii Krajowej Street in Kłodzko, stucco of the seventeenth century.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:01, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Result

Support: 1 Oppose: 0 Neutral: 0 promoted --Ezarateesteban 00:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
29 Armii Krajowej Street in Kłodzko, Hermes stucco of the nineteenth century.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yann (talk • contribs)

Result

Support: 1 Oppose: 0 Neutral:0 promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4 Władysława Jagiełły Square in Kłodzko, entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:11, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4 Kościelna Street in Kłodzko, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:11, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Building of Department of Neurology at Kłodzko Hospital, Archangel Raphael and Tobias sculpture.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:12, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Baroque Gate on Kościelny Square in Kłodzko, statue of Francis Borgia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good. Yann (talk) 21:16, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Our Lady of the Rosary church in Kłodzko, side altar of the Holy Family.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 10:07, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Baroque Gate on Kościelny Square in Kłodzko, sculpture of Francis Xavier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good. Yann (talk) 21:17, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Waliszów, kościół 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:17, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Waliszów, kościół 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 16:06, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Waliszów, kościół 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 16:06, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Czytnik kart SD.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 13:07, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Konsola PSP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:14, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Waliszów, kościół 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:04, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Krosnowice, main gate.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment the term "maine gate" should appear in the captions --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
 Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:23, 20 April 2015 (UTC)  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:31, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint John the Baptist in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie, neo-gothic relief over side entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment In fact it is a neo Gothic sculpture of the nineteenth century. This is not said in the caption. Would also be useful in this case to place it in the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
 Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:29, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

* Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:32, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oppersdorfe's palace park in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie, statue of Francis of Assisi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The character's name does not appear in captions. Similarly, it would be useful to know the time or sculptor. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
 Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:34, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:33, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oppersdorfe's palace park in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie, statue of Johann Christoph Bernsmeyer.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The character's name does not appear in captions. Similarly, it would be useful to know the time or sculptor. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
 Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:40, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oppersdorfe's palace in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment the term "maine entrance" should appear in the captions --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
 Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:43, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Horyzont w zdjęciu

Napisałeś mi w tym zdjęciu: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2014_Erywa%C5%84,_Narodowa_Galeria_Armenii_i_Muzeum_Historii_Armenii_(08).jpg że: "horyzont opada w dół z lewej strony, powinien być poziomy". Nierozumiem, w czym jest problem... Jeśli robię zdjęcie z ukosa, to jest normalne, że linie horyzontalne nie są poziome, tylko skośne. Robi się korekcję perspektywy, aby linie pionowe były proste, ale poziome będą krzywe. Nie wiem więc co bym miał zrobić z tym zdjęciem... Halavar (talk) 12:11, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

• Aa jeśli chodzi o wodę, to rozumiem, myślełem że o budynek ci chodzi. Bo on nie jest i nie będzie miał prostych linii poziomych. Ale woda, to co innego. Oke, dzięki! --Halavar (talk) 12:28, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Churchyard walls of Saint Catherine of Alexandria church in Stary Wielisław, interior of the chapel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The caption in English is a bit poor.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
 Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:46, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Churchyard walls of Saint Catherine of Alexandria church in Stary Wielisław, headstones.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The caption in English is a bit poor.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
 Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:49, 20 April 2015 (UTC)  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Anne chapel in Szalejów Dolny, statue of Saint Anne.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The character's name does not appear in captions. Similarly, it would be useful to know the time or sculptor. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
 Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:56, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Anne chapel in Szalejów Dolny, statue of Saint Joachim.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint Martin in Żelazno, gatehouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:05, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Małgorzaty w Starej Łomnicy, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:37, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stary Waliszów, kościół 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 10:52, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stary Waliszów, kościół 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:42, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stary Waliszów, kościół 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Σπάρτακος 11:10, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stary Waliszów, kościół 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:41, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Waliszów, dwór 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:00, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół na Iglicznej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Nicholas church in Nowy Waliszów, side portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:03, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Our Lady of the Rosary church in Kłodzko, altar of Saint Anthony of Padua.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:29, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Our Lady of the Rosary church in Kłodzko, altar of Our Lady of the Rosary.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:31, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Drinking house in Kudowa-Zdrój, painting gallery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:07, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stary Waliszów, kościół 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 15:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stary Waliszów, kościół 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 16:23, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Wilkanów, kościół św. Jerzego 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 13:58, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Wilkanów, kościół św. Jerzego 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 11:59, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Wilkanów, kościół św. Jerzego 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 16:18, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Waliszów, kościół 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done--Jacek Halicki 16:17, 21 April 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Moroder 11:50, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint Martin in Żelazno, defensive wall with the cloister.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
36 Zdrojowa Street in Kudowa-Zdrój, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Nowy Waliszów, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Can you add geocodes to your picture? --Ezarateesteban 23:33, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
• I forget it.  Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:40, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Ezarateesteban 01:47, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Sts. Peter and Paul in Kudowa-Zdrój, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Sts. Peter and Paul in Kudowa-Zdrój, memorial to the victims of war.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 19:59, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Catherine in Kudowa-Zdrój, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Ezarateesteban 17:40, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Catherine in Kudowa-Zdrój, sculpture of Saint Catherine of Alexandria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Nice and useful --Ezarateesteban 23:45, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cemetery at the church of St. Catherine in Kudowa-Zdrój, crucifixion group.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Wilkanów, kościół św. Jerzego 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:42, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Wilkanów, kościół św. Jerzego 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:17, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica Św. Trójcy w Dusznikach-Zdroju, 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 11:27, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Rafandrynka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 18:19, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Margaret in Stara Łomnica, gatehouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Margaret in Stara Łomnica, side entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:38, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Lawrence church in Stary Waliszów, porch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Konradów, portico.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• It need a geolocation, a full and informative description : "the portico on the western facade of the manor in Konradów built in 1542", I invent but this is an example, more there is information better it is. And it is not compulsory but is it possible in english too? -- Christian Ferrer 17:03, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Done I nominate a lot of pictures and sometimes I forget something . --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:29, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support ok best in scope -- Christian Ferrer 11:29, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Duszniki-Zdrój, park zdrojowy 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:52, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Duszniki-Zdrój, park zdrojowy 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:03, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Duszniki-Zdrój, park zdrojowy 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me.--Johann Jaritz 08:52, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Wilkanów, kościół św. Jerzego 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments looks fine --Denkmalhelfer 17:24, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House number 67 in Stary Waliszów, corner.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint George church in Wilkanów, church cemetery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Nativity of the Virgin Mary in Lądek-Zdrój, crucifix at the curch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 12:55, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Roch church in Lądek-Zdrój, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 21:14, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Roch church in Lądek-Zdrój, votive column at the church.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:47, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Mary chapel "Na Pustkowiu" in Lądek-Zdrój, side altar of St. Joachim.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 19:00, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Mary chapel "Na Pustkowiu" in Lądek-Zdrój, side altar of St. Anne.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:01, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica Św. Trójcy w Dusznikach-Zdroju, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 09:47, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica Św. Trójcy w Dusznikach-Zdroju, 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:20, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Mary chapel "Na Pustkowiu" in Lądek-Zdrój, John of Nepomuk sculpture.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spa gardens in Lądek-Zdrój, inclined fountain.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:58, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spa gardens in Lądek-Zdrój, Dąbrówka spring.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spa gardens in Lądek-Zdrój, larch alley.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Belfry in Lądek-Zdrój, tented roof and clock.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Szczytna, fountain, nozzles.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 16:23, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Filtr polaryzacyjny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Elektroniczny termometr lekarski.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:30, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pensjonat 'Słoneczna' w Dusznikach-Zdroju, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:52, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pensjonat 'Słoneczna' w Dusznikach-Zdroju, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:23, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spa complex in Lądek-Zdrój, Spa House, northern part of the building.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spa complex in Lądek-Zdrój, Spa House, southern part of the building.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jerzy Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój, cartouche with the coat of arms of Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014 Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 13 03.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 13 03.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Barbary w Droszkowie, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:07, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Antoniego w Gołogłowach, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:56, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Jaszkowa Dolna, kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:01, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Jaszkowa Dolna, kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:07, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Jaszkowa Dolna, kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:53, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jerzy Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój, sculpture over main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jerzy Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój, keystone with the putto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nikon D7100, camera with with Aputure HN100 ring flash.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wojciech Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój - interior, stuccos.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
16 Kościelna Street in Lądek-Zdrój, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:16, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Brartslawa Cumil.JPG

Chyląc czoła przed Twoim wkładem edycyjnym, a także (a może przede wszystkim) nad jakością Twoich zdjęć, dziękuję również za korektę tego zdjecia. Pozdrawiam serdecznie. Albertus teolog (talk) 23:25, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, starówka 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 08:48, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, starówka 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:34, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 08:51, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Odp.: Nominacje do VI

Dziękuję za wskazówki, a także za to, że zajmujesz się obróbką moich zdjęć. Bardzo dawno nie edytowałem, a jeszcze dawniej nie bawiłem się w oceny. Z tego powodu bardzo nieśmiało badam grunt, obserwując co nowego może mnie spotkać. Pozdrawiam. Albertus teolog (talk) 13:07, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wojciech Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój, dome.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support, although File:Lądek-Zdrój, pramen Wojciech IV.jpg, because it has more contrast, is a serious challenger. However, it is not as unsharp and has some perspective distortion. --C messier (talk) 12:31, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:49, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wojciech Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój, putti with the coat of arms of Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:49, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
18 Kościelna Street in Lądek-Zdrój, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:16, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:49, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Klahr House in Lądek-Zdrój, Eye of Providence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:18, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:50, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Klahr House in Lądek-Zdrój, Virgin Mary with Children sculpture.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:51, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój, house mark from 1581 year.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:52, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
7 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój, exposure from WSW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --C messier (talk) 12:35, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:52, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:25, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 14:55, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:23, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Looks distorted, but its handmade and pretty old ;-) --Hubertl 10:06, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój, house mark.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
6 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój, entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:56, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
8 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój, house mark.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 20:14, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
20 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój, entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:56, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Staromłyński Square in Lądek-Zdrój, stuccos on the avant-corps.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:56, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gothic Bridge in Lądek-Zdrój, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good. Yann (talk) 08:51, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rectory of Saint Andrew parish in Trzebieszowice, entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful -- Christian Ferrer 09:02, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Andrew church in Trzebieszowice, main portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:27, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 14:51, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 14:51, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kłodzko, klasztor klarysek, 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:59, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kłodzko, klasztor klarysek, 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:59, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kłodzko, klasztor klarysek, 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:40, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Klucze z breloczkiem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Slaunger 19:54, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Chromatic distortion

I tried to I removed partly the chromatic distortion with Photoshop in this nominated file.. You know, I have a faible for statues. Please have a look, restore the old version, if you don´t like it. --Hubertl (talk) 15:01, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014 Szczytna, fontanna.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Szczytna, fontanna.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Andrew church in Trzebieszowice, side portal with grating.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Andrew church in Trzebieszowice, side portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Andrew church in Trzebieszowice, porch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace annex in Trzebieszowice, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support -- Christian Ferrer 17:07, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace annex in Trzebieszowice, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:03, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, muzeum, dziedziniec 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me. --Ximonic 16:14, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, muzeum, dziedziniec 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:22, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, muzeum, dziedziniec 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Albertus teolog 08:40, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Klasztor franciszkanów w Kłodzku 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 11:14, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Klasztor franciszkanów w Kłodzku 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 11:10, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica Św. Trójcy w Dusznikach-Zdroju, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:22, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica Św. Trójcy w Dusznikach-Zdroju, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done--Jacek Halicki 18:22, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Moroder 16:20, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Wilkanów, kościół św. Jerzego 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done--Jacek Halicki 18:12, 1 May 2015 (UTC)  Support It's OK.--XRay 05:42, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Park in Trzebieszowice, balustrade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Trzebieszowice, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Trzebieszowice, side portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Trzebieszowice, coats of arms of the von Reichenbach family.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:40, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy Trinity church in Jeleniów, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment It is best in scope however if this image is the main entrance of the churh, so you should write it in the description of the file too, not only in the scope. -- Christian Ferrer 06:43, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
 Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:23, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Support thank you, useful -- Christian Ferrer 20:20, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace park in Jeleniów, main gate.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:38, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Michael Archangel church in Lewin Kłodzki, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:26, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Klasztor franciszkanów w Kłodzku 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 10:55, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:59, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 10:57, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Michael Archangel church in Lewin Kłodzki, exsposure from ENE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Michael Archangel church in Lewin Kłodzki, old cemetery at the church.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4 Chopina Street in Lewin Kłodzki, exposure from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4 Chopina Street in Lewin Kłodzki, portico.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:44, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
18 Kościuszki Square in Lewin Kłodzki, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:45, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kaplica św. Ignacego 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 12:00, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kaplica św. Ignacego 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 14:37, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:54, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The angel at the left and the sculptures at the right seem to be a bit distorted. -- Spurzem 08:46, 28 April 2015 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 09:57, 28 April 2015 (UTC) Good now. Beautiful image -- Spurzem 19:52, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
20 Kościuszki Square in Lewin Kłodzki, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
18 Kościuszki Square in Lewin Kłodzki, keystone with the house mark.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
13 Wolności Square in Międzylesie, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko ul. Wojska Polskiego 11 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 10:30, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko ul. Wojska Polskiego 11 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 10:56, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko ul. Wojska Polskiego 11 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 10:30, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko ul. Wojska Polskiego 11 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:12, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2-4 Wojska Polskiego Street in Międzylesie, arcades.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2-4 Wojska Polskiego Street in Międzylesie, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Peter and Paul church in Bożków, Magnis family's chapel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Park and garden terraces at the Bożków Palace, palace annex, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support. Criteria met -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:43, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Bartholomew church in Czerwieńczyce, crest founder of the church.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:15, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel of St. Ignatius in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support It is valued, interesting combo with moon. I see first time f/9.5.--Mile (talk) 19:55, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko ul. Wojska Polskiego 11 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:31, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko ul. Wojska Polskiego 11 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:28, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko ul. Wojska Polskiego 11 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:28, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko ul. Wojska Polskiego 11 35.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:30, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko ul. Wojska Polskiego 11 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:33, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kłodzko, klasztor klarysek, 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Peter and Paul church in Bożków, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful -- Christian Ferrer 04:43, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Peter and Paul church in Bożków, tented roof.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Peter and Paul church in Bożków, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bożków Palace, portico.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bożków Palace, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 18:44, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Martin in Dzikowiec, crucifixion group at the church.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:49, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kwiatostan wiśni pospolitej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:08, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kwiatostan gruszy pospolitej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 10:29, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko ul. Wojska Polskiego 11 46.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:21, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko ul. Wojska Polskiego 11 47.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:36, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kaplica św. Ignacego 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI IMO. --C messier 16:53, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Park and garden terraces at the Bożków Palace, garden terraces.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Bartholomew church in Czerwieńczyce, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Bartholomew church in Czerwieńczyce, stone cross at the church.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Martin in Dzikowiec, gatehouse, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment as there are two facade indicate : "taken from ...." -- Christian Ferrer 11:57, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:37, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Support useful -- Christian Ferrer 17:14, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:39, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fountain in Nowa Ruda, statue of Jesus and John the Baptist.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good. Yann (talk) 20:21, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:41, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall in Nowa Ruda, exposure from SSW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good choice. Yann (talk) 20:19, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:42, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Fajerwerki w Kłodzku 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 12:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Fajerwerki w Kłodzku 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 12:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Fajerwerki w Kłodzku 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:15, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Fajerwerki w Kłodzku 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:15, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kwiatostan jabłoni domowej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some CAs visible at the contours of the flower --Uoaei1 10:56, 7 May 2015 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 17:49, 7 May 2015 (UTC) Ok now --Uoaei1 08:31, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko ul. Wojska Polskiego 11 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality imo. A bit noisy from high ISO --Moroder 19:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko ul. Wojska Polskiego 11 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Billy69150 15:42, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko ul. Wojska Polskiego 11 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:09, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments After reworking, the Quality is ok. --Hubertl 17:26, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kłodzko, klasztor klarysek, 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Too bad, Mary's face is covered by the gate ornament. --MB-one 11:31, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel of St. Ignatius in Kłodzko, altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Martin in Dzikowiec, tented roof.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Dzikowiec, outbuilding, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former evangelical church, now Museum of the Sowiogórska Land in Ludwikowice Kłodzkie, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 08:04, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Polanica-Zdrój, baptismal font.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 08:03, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Polanica-Zdrój, pulpit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 08:06, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:01, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, fort na Owczej Górze 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:33, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, fort na Owczej Górze 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:29, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, fort na Owczej Górze 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:24, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, fort na Owczej Górze 25.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:24, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, fort na Owczej Górze 40.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:29, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy Cross church in Nowa Ruda, altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:48, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Polanica-Zdrój, chancel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
15 Wolności Square in Międzylesie, corridor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:50, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall in Radków, main portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:35, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Sky Tower we Wrocławiu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, fort na Owczej Górze 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:39, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ratusz 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ratusz 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:40, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ratusz 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:31, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Fajerwerki w Kłodzku 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice. --Hockei 16:11, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

lewa strona opada

A propo tego zdjęcia File:2015 Sokal, Departament Skarbu Państwa rejonu sokalskiego obwodu lwowskiego 05.JPG. Zdjęcia nie robiłem dokładnie na wprost ale lekko z boku, więc naturalne jest, że linie poziome nie będą równe. Z tego co wiem, to nie ma obowiązku robić zdjęć dokładnie na wprost aby miały przez to równe jak od linijki linie poziome. Ważne zaś jest to, aby w korekcji perspektywy mieć równe linie pionowe. Zaś w tym zdjęciu jak i w kilku poprzednich zwracasz mi uwagę na linie poziome i nie wiem czemu... Halavar (talk) 14:10, 13 May 2015 (UTC) Hmm jak dla mnie to nie wyglądało źle, ale normalnie. Przy tych poprzednich zdjęciach (a było ich już chyba z 5 czy 6) także. Bawienie się suwakami kilkanaście minut przy jednym zdjęciu aby wyprostować je do matematycznej precyzji, aby wszystkie linie poziome były idealnie proste, to wg mnie strata cennego czasu a poza tym działanie odbiegające od normalności, kształtu budynku. Co do tego konkretnego zdjęcia, to teraz wrzuciłem poprawioną wersję, która wg mnie wcale nie wygląda jakoś lepiej niż poprzednia, ale straciłem za to jakieś 10 minut na to wszystko. Jak dla mnie nie warto... --Halavar (talk) 15:31, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Park w Wolanach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 18:27, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Szczytna, ul. Wolności 7 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, although IMHO, so high ISO wasn't necessary. --C messier 09:27, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Szczytna, ul. Wolności 7 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:45, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Szczytna, ul. Wolności 7 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:09, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Szczytna, kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Verticals are a mess, but IMHO, good enough for QI, good quality. --C messier 09:32, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prunus cerasus (Sour cherry), blossoms.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Malus domestica (Apple tree), blossoms.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pyrus communis, Pear, blossoms.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel of St. Anthony in Nowy Wielisław, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theatre in Polanica-Zdrój, fountain at the theatre.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Andrew Bobola church in Radków, spires roof with clock.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:29, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall in Radków, side portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:20, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:30, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall in Radków, portal on the southern wall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:21, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:41, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall in Radków, coat of arms of Radków on the portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Llez (talk) 17:22, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:41, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Grunwaldzka Street in Radków, house mark from 1593.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Llez (talk) 17:23, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:41, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2015 Kwiatostan gruszy pospolitej.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2015 Kwiatostan gruszy pospolitej.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Szczytna, kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:15, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Szczytna, kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:46, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Wita w Niwie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:10, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Wita w Niwie 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:17, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Dorothy church in Radków, tented roof.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Dorothy church in Radków, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Dorothy church in Radków, mural painting over portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall in Radków, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support BIS -- Christian Ferrer 18:12, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Krótka Street in Radków, inscription from 1546.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:27, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
7 Wolności Street in Szczytna, exposure from ENE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Bgag (talk) 23:01, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Baptist church in Szczytna, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Bgag (talk) 22:59, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Baptist church in Szczytna, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support ok -> VI --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:30, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:31, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Góry Stołowe, świerk i głaz 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 13:57, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dom Pielgrzyma w Wambierzycach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:40, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dom Pielgrzyma w Wambierzycach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:40, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dom Pielgrzyma w Wambierzycach 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:50, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Dorothy church in Radków, side chapel interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:33, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:43, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Peter and Paul church in Raszków, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:34, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:55, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Stanislaus Kostka church in Ścinawka Dolna, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:34, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:46, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
First High School in Kłodzko, sundial.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I prefer this one, per nom.--Jebulon (talk) 21:51, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support My too --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Agree, this one is better. --Halavar (talk) 08:09, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Scores:

1. 2014 Kłodzko, Wojska Polskiego 11.JPG: 0  
2.  2015 Zegar słoneczny, Zespół Szkół Ogólnokształcących w Kłodzku.jpg: +3 <--
=>
File: 2014 Kłodzko, Wojska Polskiego 11.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former.
File: 2015 Zegar słoneczny, Zespół Szkół Ogólnokształcących w Kłodzku.jpg: Promoted.<--

--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:35, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Stanislaus Kostka church in Ścinawka Dolna, back entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support BIS, useful and with a good lightning IMO -- Christian Ferrer 11:49, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:40, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Baptist church in Pasterka, exposure from ENE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 07:37, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:42, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Bazylika w Wambierzycach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:37, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Bazylika w Wambierzycach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:37, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Bazylika w Wambierzycach 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:37, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Bazylika w Wambierzycach 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 08:24, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Góry Stołowe, świerk i głaz 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:55, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Anne church in Zieleniec, exposure from WSW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Anne church in Zieleniec, main portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Anne church in Zieleniec, entrance to the bell tower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
7 Wolności Street in Szczytna, window portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:09, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Baptist church in Szczytna, chapel at the church.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:11, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Bazylika w Wambierzycach 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:29, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Bazylika w Wambierzycach 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:29, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Bazylika w Wambierzycach 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:15, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kolumna Maryjna w Radkowie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 04:11, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Bazylika w Wambierzycach 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:23, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
7 Wolności Street in Szczytna, exposure from SSE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:50, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Baptist church in Szczytna, exposure from WNW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:50, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Baptist church in Szczytna, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:50, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Baptist church in Szczytna, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Vitus church in Niwa, exposure from SSW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Vitus church in Niwa, gatehouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:52, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Baptist church in Pasterka, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:35, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Baptist church in Pasterka, portal between the porch and the nave.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:36, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Najświętszej Marii Panny Street in Wambierzyce, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 20:59, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Najświętszej Marii Panny Street in Wambierzyce, outbuilding.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support BIS -- Christian Ferrer 06:35, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Basilica of the Visitation in Wambierzyce, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 12:07, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Basilica of the Visitation in Wambierzyce, Maria column.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 12:14, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Brama Gihon w Wambierzycach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:21, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Brama Gihon w Wambierzycach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ--663highland 08:00, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Brama w dolinie Jozafata - Wambierzyce.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:17, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Brama Jerozolimska w Wambierzycach 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:21, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Brama Jerozolimska w Wambierzycach 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:21, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Rataja 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quaéity now. --Cayambe 08:43, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Szczytna, kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shodows are too disturbing imho --Berthold Werner 08:46, 12 May 2015 (UTC) *  Support Good quality. For me the shadows are more interesting than disturbing. --Hubertl 05:51, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Vitus church in Niwa, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sky Tower in Wrocław, exposure from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good quality and useful; best in scope. --  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:46, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Way of the Cross in Wambierzyce, Gihon Gate.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:59, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Market Square in Radków, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Valued image in scope Albertus teolog (talk) 11:27, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kapliczka ścięcia św. Jakuba w Wambierzycach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:19, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kapliczka ścięcia św. Jakuba w Wambierzycach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:19, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kapliczka ścięcia św. Jakuba w Wambierzycach 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:07, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kapliczka ścięcia św. Jakuba w Wambierzycach 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:22, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kolumna Maryjna w Radkowie 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:31, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Baptist church in Pasterka, exposure from SSE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Basilica of the Visitation in Wambierzyce, exposure from ESE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Basilica of the Visitation in Wambierzyce, clock.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Hotel Karłów w Karłowie 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, maybe you could clone out the blurry birds, but IMHO, QI as it is. --C messier 09:45, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kapliczka ścięcia św. Jakuba w Wambierzycach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 09:44, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kapliczka ścięcia św. Jakuba w Wambierzycach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 09:44, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kapliczka ścięcia św. Jakuba w Wambierzycach 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 09:44, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Way of the Cross in Wambierzyce, Gihon Gate, Saint Florian relief.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Way of the Cross in Wambierzyce, Gate of Jerusalem.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marian column in Radków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Market Square in Radków, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 11:55, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Market Square in Radków, gable with the St. Florian sculpture.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Llez (talk) 11:56, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Market Square in Radków, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --El Grafo (talk) 15:36, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:25, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
6 Market Square in Radków, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 11:59, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
12 Market Square in Radków, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Bgag (talk) 03:13, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:30, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
12 Market Square in Radków, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 07:43, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kolumna Maryjna w Radkowie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:35, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kolumna Maryjna w Radkowie 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:57, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kolumna Maryjna w Radkowie 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:06, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Pasterce 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:42, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Pasterce 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:35, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marian column in Radków, Maria sculpture.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support BIS -- Christian Ferrer 05:07, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

• This one is a serious candidate with a better light though a little bit less sharp. -- Christian Ferrer 05:11, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

  IMO those photo has a background that divert attention from the main theme pictures. Please, opinions of other users. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:50, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Agree with the nominator. This image is better. --Halavar (talk) 15:00, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Ok both are good images, I was not sure, let's go for it. Useful. -- Christian Ferrer 17:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Market Square in Radków, windows, pilasters and stuccos.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4 Market Square in Radków, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4 Market Square in Radków, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
10 Market Square in Radków, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful -- Christian Ferrer 16:36, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
11 Market Square in Radków, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 18:56, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
11 Market Square in Radków, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:54, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Góry Złote z Borówkowej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Moroder 08:02, 20 May 2015 (UTC)  Support Wonderful --Billy69150 08:26, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kwiaty magnolii pośredniej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:25, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Pasterce 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:24, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Pasterce 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 08:42, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Szczyt Szczelińca Wielkiego.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:01, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
14 Market Square in Radków, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
14 Market Square in Radków, John of Nepomuk scupture.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
15 Market Square in Radków, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Market Square in Radków, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 12:08, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:45, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
26 Market Square in Radków, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 12:09, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:45, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Wita w Niwie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 08:29, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Wita w Niwie 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 08:44, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Wielisławska, dom młynarza i piekarnia 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 16:42, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Wielisławska, młyn 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:36, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Wielisławska, brama w zespole młyna.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality,DOF not good but non bad --Livioandronico2013 16:42, 21 May 2015 (UTC)