User talk:Lymantria/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

→

Archive 10

Flickr upload help

I convinced a user on Flickr to kindly change the licence of some of his pictures so we can use them on wikipedia. Would you be willing to help me upload? All pics in the folowing sets seems to have the appropriate licence at the moment: http://www.flickr.com/photos/hsuhong/sets/72157623025410305/detail/, http://www.flickr.com/photos/hsuhong/sets/72157622686294938/detail/, http://www.flickr.com/photos/hsuhong/sets/72157622030531134/detail/, http://www.flickr.com/photos/hsuhong/sets/72157617240084824/detail/, http://www.flickr.com/photos/hsuhong/sets/72157617240084824/detail/, http://www.flickr.com/photos/hsuhong/sets/72157614774734713/detail/ I am working on something else at the moment, but I will start uploading tomorrow I think. I you are willing to help, could you let me know which ones you have done? Thanks! Ruigeroeland (talk) 10:39, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Ah.. kon gewoon in het Nederlands natuurlijk. Gewoonte.. :) Ruigeroeland (talk) 10:40, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

FYI: ben begonnen met http://www.flickr.com/photos/hsuhong/sets/72157623025410305/detail/ (eerste 5 pagina's gedaan). Hij heeft echt VEEL foto's! Niet te geloven. Ruigeroeland (talk) 19:09, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Super!!!!! Lymantria (talk) 23:30, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Ik heb één foto geupload vannacht van die eerste reeks die je noemt, waar jij ook aan begonnen was. Dat leek me later onhandig, dus ben ik met de laatste begonnen. Zitten we elkaar niet in de weg. Ik heb niet tijd om er vanmorgen heel ver mee te komen, maar ik zal er gestaag aan doorgaan later. Alleen die laatste link gaat al om 20 pagina's! Hoera! Groet, Lymantria (talk) 07:55, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Zal ik elke dag een update posten van waar ik gebleven ben? Dan zitten we elkaar inderdaad niet in de weg. Ik ga vanmiddag weer verder met uploaden. Ik denk dat het in totaal wel zon 1000 plaatjes zijn. Allemaal uit Taiwan volgens mij, maar dat zal ik 'm nog eens ff vragen. Als deze klaar zijn ga ik dat nog eens een paar keer proberen op Flickr. Is de eerste keer dat ik iemand heb benaderd om licentie aan te passen, en meteen succes. Dat is wel veelbelovend. Volgens mij weten veel mensen niet dat NC plaatjes niet gebruikt kunnen worden op wikipedia. Groet en ik ben blij dat je me helpt. Is nogal een klus! Ruigeroeland (talk) 10:41, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Laten we het hier bijhouden: User:Lymantria/Taiwanese Flickr images. Groet, Lymantria (talk) 11:09, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Handig! Zal ik doen. Ruigeroeland (talk) 12:21, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Misschien kun je ook zorgen voor een bestandsnaam met de soort erin genoemd. De namen van de aanmaker op Flickr zijn niet erg behulpzaam. Groet, Lymantria (talk) 07:37, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Je hebt gelijk. Doe ik vanaf nu. Ruigeroeland (talk) 14:58, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Somatochlora williamsoni larva.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 13:20, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. Lymantria (talk) 13:23, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

FYI: Tagging or blocking facebook and google-uploads

I did a bit research and found that abuse-filter does not add any content-variable to file-uploads and added therefore a posting to bugzilla:19565. Regards -- RE rillke questions? 13:29, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Nice. It also applies to Abusefilter 78. Thanks. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 13:35, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Flickr review category

The flickr review category has had a backlog since the flickr reviewbot has been malfunctioning for 3-4 days now as you can see from my Message to MGA73. Do you have some time to mark some images needing flickr review? I have little time on weekdays. Even the flickr upload bot has crashed. Just curious. If not, its OK and some uploaders will be unhappy but such is life, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:21, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Yes, I noticed that Flickr Upload Bot as well as the reviewbot are out of order. I just reviewed a couple of images and will do so for a couple more later today. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 06:33, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment: I try to mark a few too on weekdays but have little free time. In the end, the flickrbot has to be fixed....as I told MGA73 in a new message today. It was one of these flickrbot breakdowns that caused me to apply to be a reviewer in 2009, if I recall correctly. Sadly, this situation still repeats itself in 2011. Best wishes from Vancouver, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:03, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Copyright violation

You should check out Jason6809's uploads. I believe all of his uploads are copyright violation as he seems to be claiming pictures of musicians as his own. Thank you. Lee Jaewon (Talk) 15:06, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for noticing this. I have indeed deleted all of his uploads as copyright violations. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 17:50, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome. Lee Jaewon (Talk) 18:16, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Mark_Tuitert_celebrates_olympic_gold.jpg

File:Mark_Tuitert_celebrates_olympic_gold.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 22:30, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Michael's Grey Boxers.jpg

Hi there, The given source is still unavailable to me despite the fact that my SafeSearch feature is off? Can you see the original file on Flickr? AMERICOPHILE 21:12, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Yes, When I removed the SafeSearch, I simply saw the picture. It matched and had the indicated license. And then I put up the SafeSearch again. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 06:18, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Bots/Requests/IndareviewR

Since you are very active in license-reviewing, I would like to invite you to comment, if you feel that there is a need for on Commons:Bots/Requests/IndareviewR. Thank you. -- RE rillke questions? 20:57, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Indafoto image & category

You tagged this image below as npd but the license seems OK right now. I gave the right url for the second through to the seventh images below. Can you mark them all? Thank You.

• File:Bazilika (615. számú műemlék) 12.jpg
• File:Gör. kat. kápolna (Sarlós Boldogasszony-kápolna) (6049. számú műemlék) 77.jpg
• File:Főgimnázium (Verseghy Ferenc Gimnázium) (6061. számú műemlék) 92.jpg
• File:Indóház (13325. számú műemlék) 90.jpg
• File:Indóház (13325. számú műemlék) 89.jpg
• File:Magyar Király Szálloda (Damjanich János Múzeum) (6045. számú műemlék) 60.jpg
• File:Református parókia (18596. számú műemlék) 51.jpg

Secondly, the number of Indafoto images for review is about 116 or 117 right now (would be 110 after you marked these) but I can't mark them. I don't have license review on my old computer--only the flickr review pass/fail system and the picasa, panoramio, ipernity marking templates. Maybe you can mark some if you have the time--at least the ones with the right image. Some don't have the right image at all...but they are in the minority (unless it is from hunszabi's account where nothing matches and they should all be npd'ed sadly, I think!). Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:45, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Dear Leoboudv, Recently Rillke started checking these Indafoto images by bot - so there is only a tiny bit of the 2700 images left... I will see if I can mark a couple, but I am very busy these days. By the way, you can place the review-templates manually. I have done so quite a few times. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 18:07, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

• OK. Thanks for your help and I'll check the review template. I'm sure we all have busy lives in the real world. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:52, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Jcb

It seems that I was correct to refrain from voting from the de-Admin action against Jcb. Blue marble decided to return to Commons under a new username and he says the reason he left had nothing to do with Jcb in the first place Here I'm glad that he returned back and freely admits who he is. At least 1. he is honest (and no one has to waste time on a CU checkup) and 2. we still have a valuable Vietnamese contributor. It also says that first impressions are not always right. I'm originally from Malaysia as I say here and education and exams in Southeast Asia are very important. School and University exams are full of high pressure and a few students in Malaysia hang themselves if they fail a major exam sometimes rather than admit a failure to their parents. Parents expect you to study 12-15 hours a day and pass all major exams in Southeast Asia and the cultural pressure to excel is relentless there. When I came to Canada in 1989, I suffered some culture shock as many school students here took exams so lightly. I guess its the same in Europe. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:21, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

PS: Blue marble/Morning Sunshine initiated a DR on this image. I don't know if there is any right answer but if you have any views for or against my position, feel free to make a comment. Sadly in an open campaign, people always carry such posters but this is from the candidate's own flickr account. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:55, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much, Leoboudv. I am very glad to hear that Blue Marble has reappeared as Morning Sunshine. I hope he will not get into a real addiction again which hurts his study. You are right about Europe, and I see Southeast Asian people coming here having the same culture shock. As for the campaign-board, I think De minimis applies here. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 06:49, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

• Thank you for your reply. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:56, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Suruchi 2010

The two images I uploaded had (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0) rights. During the upload I chose this option on the upload page.Is 'no derivative' an issue? Else the photographer has given CC license on the respective Flickr pages http://www.flickr.com/photos/runab/5082843123/ and http://www.flickr.com/photos/85296574@N00/764667131/ ? Plz help understand Tinkswiki (talk) 03:43, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Dear Tinkswiki, I have overlooked your message until now. Indeed "no derivative" is an issue, see Commons:Flickr files. Lymantria (talk) 09:13, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Zeêuws text needing translation

Hi Lymantria. I note that you've got some ability in Zeêuws, and I was wondering whether you could translate the caption of File:Jacobus Koelman.jpeg. The image is currently a featured picture candidate, and two users have requested a translation. Thanks. --Claritas (talk) 12:37, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

I tried to. The text is more of old Dutch than Zeêuws. Regards, Lymantria (talk) 19:54, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks very much  ! --Claritas (talk) 22:31, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the corrections of my English. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 09:09, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Taiwan

Alle afbeeldingen zijn ge-upload. Bedankt voor de hulp! Ik ga eerst artikelen maken voor wikipedia (heb er al een aardig aantal gedaan). Wellicht vraag ik 'm of ik nog wat foto's mag gebruiken, maar ik denk dat ik dan gericht ga vragen om afbeeldingen van soorten waarvan we er nog geen op wikipedia hebben. Ik ben het wel zat om tientallen keren dezelfde soort voorbij te zien komen.. :) Ruigeroeland (talk) 20:54, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Oh, prima, ik was net van plan te vragen hoe ver je was. Het zijn wel mooie afbeeldingen met veel uit Taiwan endemsiche soorten, dus op zich een heel bijzondere collectie!! Prachtig werk, kortom, dank daarvoor. Groet, Lymantria (talk) 09:07, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Lymantria. You have new messages at Ww2censor's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ww2censor (talk) 16:08, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Why'd you delete CeCe Jones?

Hey! Why did ya delete my uploaded pic? It's from Flickr, whoever you are.

It may be from Flickr, but then the Flickr user has stolen the image. In the EXIF information that goes with the picture it was stated clearly that "©2010 Disney Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved". We cannot wave that away. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 15:00, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Norton Simon Museum.jpg

What do you do with this image where the flickr account no longer exists? Apparently, the image was uploaded by a bot originally in 2010 from its image history. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:54, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

I tried to find evidence of the license, but we simply can't check it. There is not much more we can do than tag it "No source" and give it a week that way. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 10:52, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment: OK. I thought that since the bot was supposedly the flickr upload bot, the image might be OK at upload but I have no proof. I thought bots like this would only upload freely licensed images. But that's OK. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:55, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment: Here are 3 images from this flickr account and the first was uploaded by the same uploader--Catfisheye--who used the flickr upload bot. I don't know if it means anything. The image you tagged and this image were uploaded within 1 day of each other in August 2010....and it was taken by the same camera. Is this evidence that the image you tagged was free at upload? Pls. check the image I mentioned with the image Denniss just deleted above that you tagged. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:59, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
  • The image was deleted before by Túrelio because of possible problems with the statues (if I understand correctly), which makes sense as they are not covered by FoP in the USA. Initially it was indeed uploaded by Flickr Upload Bot, so that the license was indeed correct. I am sorry that I had overlooked that. I think we should rest this case, however. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 08:11, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment: I did not see the US FOP problem from Turelio's viewpoint. I just thought about the flickr license and the fact that it was uploaded by the flickr uploader bot. Its better to drop this matter now then as you state. My apologies. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:46, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

No problem, thanks for mentioning and being critical in a positive way. We need that attitude. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 08:53, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Lipetsk - tractor monument.jpg

If this monument is OK because it shows a tractor, please feel free to mark it. If not consider filing a DR. I am not 100% sure but I think the uploader, High Contrast, would know what is OK here regarding FOP. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:44, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Apart from the vehicle the part of the monument doesn't show a thing beyong the threshold of originality, so I marked the image. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 08:16, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment]: Thank you about mentioning that rule. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:43, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

The Administrator's barnstar

		The Administrator's barnstar
		I hereby award Lymantria this barnstar for high activity as Administrator on Commons in 2011. Very good work! -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:33, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 09:48, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for finding the originals of the photos of St Fagans Museum I uploaded! Ham (talk) 09:49, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome! Lymantria (talk) 09:51, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Insignia templates

Hi. Just a comment regarding this edit. {{Insignia-Sweden}} (and the normal insignia tag) is not indication of copyright status, only usage restrictions. I've now deleted the file./Lokal_Profil 12:43, 30 January 2012 (UTC)"

Thank you, it means that I have misunderstood the template. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 13:29, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

No worries. For some countries the insignia templates are combined with (c) templates which can lead to confusion. /Lokal_Profil 15:13, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

License

If I ask the creator of the image Bonkras_evaluation_Yonenaga_game_2.jpg if I may put the image in Wikipedia and they say yes, is that good enough?Message by Mschribr

Not quite. The message should be sent to the OTRS-team and should clearly release rights on the image. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 18:41, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Osmia cornuta02.jpg

Despite of its name this is not Osmia cornuta. Read the description ofd this file File:Haftlappen.jpg. --Kersti (talk) 16:25, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks so much! I must have overlooked this when recategorizing it. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 18:45, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Garage de l'Est

Hello Lymantria - I see you have tagged a number of files I recently uploaded. I don't know who did the original OTRS (or if it was some other method), but the owner of Garage de l'Est allows for his photos to be used freely. See Category:Photographs from the Garage de l'Est for more. Perhaps one of the first uploaders of photos from the site could put your concerns to rest? Best regards, Mr.choppers (talk) 08:15, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

I don't see any of the photographs in the category having a OTRS-ticket attached. Then I don't think the permission given is valid (anymore). Hmm, perhaps you could make the site owner send permission. Good luck. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 08:39, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Are you suggesting that ninety (90) files are all of a sudden copyvios? A majority of them have been here since 2006 - without any complaint from Garage de l'Est. Instead of deleting everything, how about we find out what is happening instead? Mr.choppers (talk) 09:56, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Indeed the files as they are now, do not have sufficient permission. See COM:Permission#OTRS and Permission. I don't suggest they are copyvios, but I suggest that the permission has to be brought into a OTRS-ticket or a notification on the source website. It may be that in 2006 some people were less strict in it, but permission should really be verifiable - what if the site owner does indeed complain and sends a huge bill? I will not immediately make a mass DR, but hope you will succeed in getting permission in the desired way for the images I tagged from todays uploads. All the best, Lymantria (talk) 10:10, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

I wrote the owner and he responded within a couple of hours asking me what he needs to to protect the images, as he is very willing to share any and all of them. I am pleasantly surprised, as I had feared that he might have forgotten all about it by now, five and-a-half years later. I prefer not to wrestle too directly with copyrights, would you have a ready form at hand which I can send him, which we could then use as a basis for a template for pictures borrowed from his site? Sort of like Template:Egypt Archive, except better. Thanks for your help. Mr.choppers (talk) 16:37, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello again - I have been conversing with Mr. Stedehouder who is currently on vacation. He said that he will write me a confirmation when he gets back on Tuesday. I saw that the images you marked for deletion were deleted, but I saved the files so I will just wait with uploading them until all is squared away. If you have any ongoing concerns I will be happy to provide you with a copy of our conversation. Cheers, Mr.choppers (talk) 00:35, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

We'll await the confirmations. If necessary, deleted images can be undeleted. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 09:55, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

RfCU

Thank you for your support and kind words.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:09, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. Lymantria (talk) 12:09, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Flickr

• File:BUGA 2011 647.jpg
• File:BUGA 2011 638.jpg
• File:BUGA 2011 064.jpg
• File:BUGA 2011 038.jpg

Hello, why have you deleted the files from my Flickr upload? I thought a Bot will upload the files from flickr? What went wrong? Can you please restore the files and I will upload the pictures manualy. --Schängel (talk) 16:39, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

It was because there were no files attached. I will place them back. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 17:56, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Hmm now since you have deleted the photo it won´t work I guess. The Bot hasn´t uploaded the photo within one day. --Schängel (talk) 16:40, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

I didn't delete any photo, it simply wasn't uploaded. "Click this link to complete the upload" didn't help. Lymantria (talk) 16:45, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

But you have deleted the token for the bot to upload the photos automaticly. Now it won´t work also the link is not working. And now? --Schängel (talk) 16:53, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

I didn't delete before trying myself - it wasn't working. Now you may manually upload, as you suggested. Remove the token with the license and add {{Flickrreview}}. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 17:00, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Guillermo Tolentino

Dag Lymantria, Waarom worden de foto's van beelden van Guillermo Tolentino verwijderd? Deze kunstenaar is toch reeds meer dan 25 jaar dood (1976)? Bij mijn weten is 25 jaar de termijn die geldt in de Filipijnse wetgeving voor nl:Toegepaste kunst. Groeten Magalhães (talk) 20:15, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Even nagekeken en de verwijderingen lijken me inderdaad niet correct: Ter verduidelijking nog even een verdere toelichting in het Engels (gebaseerd op een soortgelijk geval dat ook werd teruggeplaatst): This is not correct and should be reverted. The nominator refers on the nomination page to the fact that the Philippines is a non-FoP country. In this case however copyright is no longer in place. This specific Philippine artist Guillermo Tolentino died 36 years ago (in 1976). Therefor the copyright restriction is no longer in place (>25 years after the date of making in case of applied art). see section 213.1 in the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines, or the section about the Philippines on Commons:Licensing. Groeten Magalhães (talk) 20:15, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, Magalhães, Maar in mijn ogen is er hier geen sprake van toegepaste kunst, maar om beelden, "gewone kunst" dus. En dan geldt een termijn van sterfdatum + 50 jaar. Maar een bredere discussie door een "undeletion request" is misschien de moeite waard. Groet, Lymantria (talk) 08:42, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Daar kan je inderdaad over discussieren of beelden nu kunst of toegepaste kunst zijn. Er is echter ook een foto van het Philippine General hospital verwijderd. Dat betrof volgens mij gewoon het gebouw (kan ik helaas niet meer bekijken nu de afbeelding al weg is). "Architectuur" valt wel onder toegepaste kunst (zie ook nl:Toegepaste kunst.). groeten Magalhães (talk) 17:13, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Het ging daar weer om een beeld dat prominent midden op de foto stond, voor het betreffende ziekenhuis. Door mij te prominent beschouwd voor een "de minimis". Maar inderdaad zou architectuur onder toegepaste kunst vallen. Groet, Lymantria (talk) 07:43, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

File verplaatsen

Kun jij toevallig files verplaatsen? Het gaat om Aethalida dora.JPG. Dit is eigenlijk "Aethalida whiteheadi", voorheen een synonym van Aethalida dora,, maar nu schijnbaar niet meer. Alvast dank! Ruigeroeland (talk) 11:43, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Uitgevoerd. Gebeurt wel vaker! Groet, Lymantria (talk) 11:46, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Bedankt! Ruigeroeland (talk) 13:51, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Fout

Beste Lymantria, Lutz Jacobi.jpg heb je terecht verwijderd, maar zou je ook Diederik_Maarten_Samsom.jpg willen verwijderen, want daar geldt hetzelfde voor, maar heb ik de verkeerde licentie (zonder NC) opgenomen. Bij voorbaat dank, Met vriendelijke groet, regards, Biccie (talk) 22:08, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Gedaan. Bedankt voor het melden. Groet, Lymantria (talk) 06:40, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Deleted pic

As you can see in my contributions: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Wiay22 I asked everybody for help: to a experimented user, in the discussion of the picture and in the help desk, and nobody help me.... And now the pic is deleted :(

I think the picture is free, because is taked before 1918 that is the year that Rafael Roldós was died. In the other hand the picture is of the familiar archive of Roldós. I know the familly and they are agree to get free teh picture. Please, can you help me for have the picture??

Thanks, --Wiay22 (talk) 10:20, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

The problem with a date is that in most countries the date of death of the photographer +70 years is needed before a picture is free. The public domain status is hence unclear. However, releasing rights does clear it up. You can read details here how to send a release note to the OTRS-system. When the note is recieved and found in order, the image can be undeleted. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 10:26, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

I still have two doubts:

- That picture was taked around 1887, so it's easy that the photographer was dead more than 70 years ago. But it's impossible to know because nobody know who is the photographer of the picture. So?

- In the other hand, if the picture is from the family archive and they want to get free the pic, is this enough for stay at commons?

I'm waiting for your answers. Thank you a lot.--Wiay22 (talk) 10:41, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

First point: This is treated differently per country. It depends also whether the photograph was published before or not and if the photgrapher is known. For unpublished and anonymous works for instance a term of creation +120 years is used in the USA. See {{PD-US-unpublished}}. Spain of course is a EU-country, and if published {{PD-anon-70}} may apply. If it is only in a private collection, it may be in Public Domain. See also en:Wikipedia:PD for details.

It depends on whether the family is to be seen as "rights holder". It may be hard to get certainty about that.

Please let me know exactly what you know about possible publication. Then perhaps I can restore the image. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 11:13, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello and thanks for your help.

This picture was taken in the wedding of Rafael Roldós, that was around 1886, it's difficult know the year exactly (his first son was born in 1886). This picture was a familiar private picture all this time, at it was in the familiar archive. Last year, it was a important exposition in Barcelona, about the begginings of the publicity in Spain. Rafael Roldós was one of the pioneers in that and the familly let to the exposition a lot of pictures of the man. At the same time, the familly let the pictures to some newspapers of the city for publish.

I wrote to El Periodico and they said to me that i have to put in contact with the familly. I did, and the familly said to me that they want to get the picture free.

I hope you have enough with this explanation. Waiting for your answer, king regards, --Wiay22 (talk) 18:01, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your help!!! --Wiay22 (talk) 18:37, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. Lymantria (talk) 06:30, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Bee Tribes of the World

Thank you for finding that website, the pictures are awesome. Also thanks for using the category, it saves me time tracking them down and adding it myself. If they're not done by tomorrow I'll mark them as reviewed. Cheers, Sven Manguard Wha? 06:05, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the kind words! I will upload a couple more of them today. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 06:31, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments NL

Beste Lymantria,

Alle winnende foto's van Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 zijn ondertussen gedrukt als kalenders.

Wikimedia Nederland stelt er hier 100 van beschikbaar voor alle uploaders van de afbeeldingen. Geef op de bijgevoegde link je naam en adres en we sturen je kosteloos een exemplaar toe, als dank voor je deelname! Let op: op = op!! Bestel hier één kalender per adres.

Ook dit jaar zal er in september weer een Nederlandse Wiki Loves Monuments plaatsvinden, als onderdeel van de internationale wedstrijd. Meer informatie vind je tegen die tijd op http://www.wikilovesmonuments.nl/.
Ook zoeken wij nog vrijwilligers die het leuk vinden om mee te helpen met het organiseren van de landelijke wedstrijd of van locale evenementen (een "Wiki takes..." in je eigen woonplaats dus!). Meer informatie daarover vind je op de wiki van Wikimedia Nederland.

Sent by Lucia Bot^talk in 14:57, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Copyright?

Ik vond net dit document: [1]. Het is gemaakt door de Forest Service en/of United States Department of Agriculture en lijkt me dus vallen onder een werk van de US federale overheid. Ik zie ook nergens een copyright logo of statement. Zou dit betekenen dat ik de foto's (en tekst) zo kan gebruiken? Wat denk jij? Ruigeroeland (talk) 12:58, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Als aanvulling: zou erg mooi zijn als we ze mogen gebruiken, want ze hebben meer interessante documenten online staan! zie: [2] Ruigeroeland (talk) 13:01, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Het is iets gecompliceerd, doordat ook de Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station betrokken is, en dat is géén federaal instituut. Daardoor geldt {{PD-USGov}} niet, terwijl dat wel zo zou zijn als het document alleen door USDA of USFS (of samen) zou zijn gemaakt. Dus misschien zit er tussen de andere titels wel iets wat je kunt gebruiken. Pas wel op met foto's die zijn overgenomen van derden, die vallen ook niet (altijd) onder PD-USGov. Groet, Lymantria (talk) 13:21, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Hmm ja. Ik zie wel dat de uitgave van het "Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team" is, en dat valt onder de Forest Service als ik het goed begrijp. Wellicht dat ik er een mailtje aan waag om te vragen hoe het zit. Thanks iig. Ik laat ze voorlopig maar even zitten. Ruigeroeland (talk) 13:26, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Anabolia nervosa.jpg

File:Anabolia nervosa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ralgis 20:50, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

flickrreview

Hi Lymantria, Do we really need this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiran Gopi (talk • contribs)

Perhaps not, but I handled some 100 of these, most of them with a valid license from Flickr. And only two of them had a OTRS-notice. So, why not? Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 09:49, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

No Problem :). The ticket is for 188 images, currently I don't have much bandwidth to add ticket number in all files. Will add shortly. --Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 10:29, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Wrong name and description for image

Hi! I'm kind of new on Commons (I'm ratter active on the English and Hungarian WP) I only registered to notify a major mistake for an image, I believe you uploaded it. I briefed it up here: File_talk:R._k._templom_(3527._számú_műemlék).jpg If you would like to keep the image with the correct info, let me know and I can provide you the data (I work at monuments preservation).

Zoli79 (talk) 08:17, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much for noticing. I did not upload the image, but I am glad to repair the file name. Please do correct the image info on the file page, and I will rename into a correct name as well. If assistence is needed, I hear from you. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 08:40, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

OH, Sorry - I told you I'm new here... :) Should I use English names or Hungarian names for description and other info? Could you give me a link for a similar case that could be regarded as reference? Zoli79 (talk) 09:28, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

The info is now in Hungarian and that is acceptable. You may change it. If you are capable of adding an English translation as well, that would be perfect. Just add the english translation after the description in hungarian as: {{en|Eastern orthodox church ....}}. Perhaps also a correction of the monumentnumber is needed. Please feel free to do so. Thank you. Please suggest a correct file name here, in line with the name already given, I will do the name change. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 17:46, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the info! I corrected the name and ID number. Zoli79 (talk) 07:38, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

And I changed the File name. Thanks a lot! Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 08:48, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Imágenes

Hello!!!

   Lymantria cómo estás... Mira, yo soy nuevo y me gustaría si pudieras ayudarme a cómo subir imágenes sin violar las leyes de Wikimedia.

   Te estaría muy agradecido si pudieras ayudarme.

You can answer me in your language if you wish!

AGEchacky (talk) 14:49, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Welcome! That is a very general question! Perhaps you best read Commons:Primeros pasos/Selección de licencia and Commons:Image casebook as a start. If you have a specific problem, feel free to ask a question. Through google-translate I will try to understand it. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 14:51, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Tráfego urbano em São José dos Campos SP.jpg

Should this image be passed or failed? It is the only image from this flickr account. No one wants to mark it and I can't tell if its an obvious flickrwash. If it is, feel free to delete it. If not, feel free to pass it...if you wish. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:48, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for mentioning. The picture and license seem OK to me, so I reviewed it. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 05:29, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

• Thank You. The picture didn't seem like a flickrwash. But when it comes from an account with only 1 free image, most people don't want to take the chance and pass a potential copyvio. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:16, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
• File:Jayne Mansfield nightclub.jpg This is a case where a colourised image of Jane Mansfield is placed on a flickr account. She died in 1967. No one is sure if the image is in the public domain. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:18, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
  • This seems to me a screenshot from the Too hot to handle movie (1960). I wouldn't guess it is PD. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 09:32, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
• Thanks. I made a comment in the DR as Commons can only take pre-1977 movie trailers. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:37, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

BH review

Hello, I have uploaded these pictures from Bollywood Hungama, would it be possible for you to review them? Thanks in advance.

• http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gauri_Khan.jpg
• http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SRK_and_Farah_on_OSO_set.jpg
• http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Arjun_Rampal_12.jpg

--Meryam90 (talk) 21:09, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

 Done Lymantria (talk) 10:57, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Need some time

I try to help this user out. Can you hold a while before deleting all her images. Thank you ! --Zorion (talk) 14:21, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

I'll be patient Lymantria (talk) 20:14, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

File:DonnaSummerMemorial.PNG

Is this image OK for Commons? It has a few derivative images but maybe the main focus is on the memorial for Donna Summer. I can't say. PS: The image on flickr actually has a larger size so if this image can be passed then perhaps a larger sized image can be uploaded. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:07, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

By the way, on this image that I uploaded a few months ago below, the license on flickr is "cc by sa 2.0" but the flickr owner says on his profile that he licenses his images as "cc by sa 3.0" US. Should the license version be changed to 'cc by sa 3.0 US' as the author states...or do you know how to do this?

• File:Ho Feng Shan plaque (Shanghai Jewish Refugees Museum).jpg

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:26, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Dear Leoboudv,

The Donna Dummer memorial seems acceptable to me, as an example of "de minimis". I reviewed it, but did not upload a larger version. To my surprise the photograph at Flickr is a .jpg, I think it would be better to upload a .jpg seperately.

To the second photograph you may just add both licenses. I have done so. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 07:14, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment: Thank you for your response. I didn't know that an image could have 2 different versions of the same license and I wasn't aware how to type in the us version. Thanks again for your help and for reviewing the first image. I was wondering if the derivative images in it meant tha Commons couldn't keep it...but the context was clear as long as no one cropped the photo. Perhaps its better to let the png image remain here due to the presence of the derivative photos. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:39, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
  • That certainly is better. But I would enfavor an upload of .jpg as well. And the licenses, they are in fact different licenses. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 07:55, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Anisota senatoria larva & pupa.jpg

File:Anisota senatoria larva & pupa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bomazi (talk) 15:27, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Epiaeschna heros.jpg

File:Epiaeschna heros.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bomazi (talk) 15:28, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Somatochlora williamsoni larva.jpg

File:Somatochlora williamsoni larva.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bomazi (talk) 15:28, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Lophocampa caryae larva.jpg

File:Lophocampa caryae larva.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bomazi (talk) 15:29, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Anisota senatoria adult & eggs.jpg

File:Anisota senatoria adult & eggs.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bomazi (talk) 15:29, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Anisota senatoria larva & pupa.jpg

File:Anisota senatoria larva & pupa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bomazi (talk) 15:29, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

What is the missing information?

Hello Lymantria,

You have recently left some messages in my talk page about some missing information in some images I have uploaded and a notice of erasing the images. I don't understand which is the missing information. The images have information about the author and the source that are the same, the website "Xilocapedia", a local wiki with a Creative Commons license CC BY 3.0. You can see in the main page of the website of Xilocapedia (at the bottom of the main page) that it clearly indicates in Spanish "Los contenidos de esta web están bajo una licencia Creative Commons si no se indica lo contrario", what means that "The contents of this website are under a Creative Commons license if it is not indicated the contrary", and below in this same website it is indicated that the Creative Commons license is the CC BY 3.0. with a link to the Creative Commons license page with the conditions of this license. Each image I have uploaded from this website has a link to this website so everyone can see all I are telling you. Besides, the license is indicated in every image page in Wikipedia Commons.

Regards.

--DSB1 (talk) 18:12, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

When I open the link, I don't see the image. That way I can't check whether the image is uploaded there and what additional information (Author for instance) is given. I have updated the file link and completed the information for http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anacamptis_champagneuxii_02_Jiloca.jpg. Please take a careful look and try give the specific link and to complete the other information as well. Otherwise correctness cannot be checked. Thank you. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 18:18, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

File:ЗАО "Светлана-Оптоэлектроника".jpg

Добрый день, Lymantria! подскажите, пожалуйста, почему всё же удалили файл? я отправляла подтверждение, что автор (компания "Светлана-Оптоэлектроника") согласен на лицензирование файла во вторник (05.06.2012) --SvetaLED (talk) 12:24, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

I didn't delete it, but apparently permission was not (yet) received by the OTRS-team. If it does, the file can be undeleted. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 13:37, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Esteban Paulón.jpeg

Please delete this recent upload. He/She removed my flickrfail review on this image which is still unfree on flickr. I consider this to be a bad faith edit although it could be a misunderstanding. PS: Initially, the uploader didn't even give the source for the image--I did. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:32, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

 Done Thank you. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 07:41, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

• Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 17:41, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Great Stalacpipe Organ, Luray Caverns, Virginia.ogv & File:Vintage auto piano, Musée Mécanique.ogg

If your computer can handle these 2 music files, please feel free to mark them. The uploads must be 2 days old by now. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:27, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment: I wonder...can Commons keep this image below of a stadium in Uzbekistan below or would COM:FOP stop this? I know the former Soviet states have no FOP. But, on the other hand, there is this category from 2009...so maybe this image can be kept? What do you think as an Admin? Its your call.
• File:Buxoro Sport Majmuasi2.jpg Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:43, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for remarking. I marked the videos and started a DR for the Association football venues in Uzbekistan, except for one file in it. I think they can't be kept. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 06:46, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment: Thank you. The creation of the old category from 2009 confused matters for me. Anyway, I voted to delete too. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:56, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 07:57, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Acebo Jiloca.jpg

I have talked about this file in the deletion request page you have started. You can see that in [[3]]. Regards.--DSB1 (talk) 10:54, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 10:56, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

This DR

I believe this image you nominated could be kept. Madame Tussaud sculptures can be kept if a photograph of its art work was taken in a country which has FOP like Britain or Australia...in this case. There is now a Madame Tussauds location in Sydney, Australia apparently. I did not know this until now so it must be quite new. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:39, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. You could well be right. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 06:15, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Gerald Westheimer (1924 - ).jpg

This file appears to be unimpeded common access on Flickr. Isn't this good enough for us? If not, what is the procedure? Thank you.

Hertils (talk) 16:04, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

The procedure should be: add source link to this file on flickr, remove the no source indications and add a flickrreview-template. I have done so. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 07:20, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Great. Many thanks! Hertils (talk) 15:43, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Baghdad South Power Station - October 2003 - side view with the four chimneys.jpg

Hello!

I have noticed your "no source"-tagging of this image. The problem is that the original source is vanished / not available anymore. The only thing that is remained is the EXIF information where can be seen that "Thomas Hartwell" is the author of it. The EXIF info was not modified by me. Apart from that, I tried to find the image again on the official USAID page but I had no success. The question is whether we keep this file due to the EXIF info or otherwisely we must delete it because the source page is gone. What do you think? Regards, High Contrast (talk) 09:39, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Ah, thank you. I missed the EXIF. On basis of that I have reviewed it. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 09:44, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Irina Shayk en Cannes.jpg

Claramente dice en la descripción de la licencia de la imagen de Irina Shayk: Solo Para Uso de Contenido Editorial. El uso de esta imagen en publicidad o para propósitos promocionales está prohibido. Especifica en un cuadro desplegable Contenido Editorial Imágenes de Contenido Editorial, las cuales incluyen eventos informativos y celebridades, no están autorizadas para uso comercial. Las imágenes No Editoriales se pueden usar para casi cualquier propósito. No estoy haciendo uso de la imagen para lucro o cualquier otro provecho, más que para ilustrar la galería de la modelo.--Ninrouter (talk) 00:31, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

I understand YOU do not intend to reuse the image for commercial or promotional purposes. But images here must be reusable commercially or promotionally. See the 4th bullet of Commons:Sobre las licencias#Licencias aceptables. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 06:11, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Johan Reinhard Ampato 1995.jpg

Hi, I uploaded the file "Johan Reinhard Ampato 1995.jpg", but it was marked because of lack of source identification. Now I added the link to the original public domain source in Plus.Google.com, I'm not sure if I did all the required updates as it's quite confusing. I also stated the public license sentence from Google terms page.

I have a fluent communication with the author of this photography, Johan Reinhard, who is one of the most prestigious anthropologist and archaeologist in the world. I have worked in documenting his most important discoveries for Wikipedia, and uploaded this pic to illustrate his personal professional profile articles in the Spanish, English and German Wikipedia projects.

Can you, please, check if the new information I stated is correct and enough, and remove the license advise?.

Thank you.

190.188.14.115 17:28, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Buenos Aires, Argentina

Thank you for the information. I don't think the google license information is sufficient - it seems to be restricted to Google-activities. I would suggest to you that you ask Johan Reinhard to send permission through the OTRS system. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 18:16, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Flickr upload!

I have done my first flickr upload, will you check once if everything was okay File:Swan_Nature.jpg? In addition, does Flickr bot warn if the image already exist in Commons? --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 10:30, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Yes, this is well done! And indeed Flickr Upload Bot warns if the image already exists here. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 13:47, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Rzhavki COA.jpg

Could you please undelete this file? I think it is possible to license it under {{PD-RU-exempt}}. Alex Spade (talk) 20:58, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

 Done Lymantria (talk) 08:19, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Template:Forestwander - wildcard license review

Hello Lymantria, could you have a look at http://www.forestwander.com/ and confirm that all their files (see also their site terms) are licensed under cc-by-sa-3.0-us and document this in Template:Forestwander (which will be used for batch-uploading, hopefully; These will be 14 GB of photos so I think we should ensure we do everything right). I will also contact OTRS but this always takes some time and looking up the ticket if questions rise also takes time.

Thanks in advance. -- RE rillke questions? 15:31, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

 Done Nice source! Lymantria (talk) 22:26, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. -- RE rillke questions? 22:38, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Phanaeus igneus.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Phanaeus igneus.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

I can't see any evidence of permission for this image to be released under the licence added. Where did you find the licence? Ww2censor (talk) 03:48, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

When I follow the file link it is shown as appearing in "google.plus". At the top of the page there is a link saying something like "go back to Picasa Web Albums". If you follow that link, you will see the license as well. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 06:39, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Actually I rooted around and found a page showing the image and its CC licence so I have removed the tag and inserted that link in the image source so there is now no question that we can see the licence from the source link. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 15:59, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. Apparently Flinfotool (which I used to retrieve the data) doesn't give the most accurate link. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 18:09, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Deletion request for File:MSIO logo.jpg, File:NOET logo.png, and File:SSO logo.jpg

Hi, I'm the uploader of File:MSIO logo.jpg, File:NOET logo.png, and File:SSO logo.jpg. After I uploaded them, I found that they are not free and in public domain and could only be used under a fair use license, so I quickly nominated them for deletion. Those logos have been awaiting deletion for 6 days now, so could you delete them now?? Their deletion requests are here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:MSIO logo.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:NOET logo.png, and Commons:Deletion requests/File:SSO logo.jpg. Thank you. JuventiniFan (talk) 06:49, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

 Done Although normally deletion requests are open for a week, this can be speedydeleted as copyvio. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 06:54, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Xilocapedia images

You commented on some of these images here but the uploader has not made any attempt to fix the image which are a large proportion of this category Category:License review needed because the source link provided is not sufficient to determine the copyright status. What to do next? Nominate for deletion all 150+ images or try to find the link for each image. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 16:21, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

I did find the source for some of them. I don't have problems with marking them all "Missing source". Lymantria (talk) 18:07, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Ok, I might get some time to do some especially if I can't find a real source easily. Ww2censor (talk) 19:21, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Irn Bru Revolution (Pleasure Beach, Blackpool) 01.jpg

File:Irn Bru Revolution (Pleasure Beach, Blackpool) 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 23:13, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Deletion discussion for File:Ed Diener.jpg

Hello! I think you closed this discussion a little prematurely, just 21 hrs after the last vote, giving little to no opportunity for anyone to comment on the vote. --Bensin (talk) 08:34, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Perhaps so, but I judged the copyright status as unsufficiently clear. It would need an OTRS-permission. Therefore I chose to delete. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 08:41, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

But the copyright status was the very focus of the discussion, and before the last vote was added most arguments were in favour of keeping the image. That there was sufficient evidence. So to close a discussion so soon after the last argument doesn't seem quite fair to those wanting to put forth counter arguments. --Bensin (talk) 10:00, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

I understand your point, my apologies for that, but I see no reason to revise my decision. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 10:27, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Since the discussion was leaning towards keep before the last vote, I think it should be reopened. If nothing else, then at least for form's sake. The file may very well end up deleted, but it should be done so after proper discussion where those involved are given proper opportunity to voice their concern. --Bensin (talk) 17:26, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Ok. Done. Lymantria (talk) 21:11, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Lycophotia porphyrea larva.jpg

File:Lycophotia porphyrea larva.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sven Manguard Wha? 22:19, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Permission

Hello! I got the permission from an owner of the blog to send his photographs to CommonsWiki, and I would like from you to help me undergoing through the procedure. Must I be the User reviewer to have that authority? Please look at the example of the sent file 1 I can also get written permission from author of the photography, if needed. --Flammard (talk) 21:31, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

No, you cannot review the image yourself - you can never review self uploads and to review you need to be assigned as License Reviewer. Besides of that, the License Review is meant for images where the free license can be seen from the site. But, you may communicate the permission through the OTRS. It is perhaps best to do that for this image first - I have put the {{OTRS pending}} template on the file. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 05:28, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Estadio Centenario - Uruguay v Brazil June 2009.ogv

If your computer can access the video on Commons, please feel free to mark it. My older computer can only access the video on flickr where I see it is licensed freely. But not on Commons sadly. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:28, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

 Done Lymantria (talk) 05:38, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

• Thank you, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:23, 3 September 2012 (UTC)