User talk:Podzemnik/archive4

06/07-06/10 07/10-11/11 12/11-04/14 05/14-11/16 12/16-06/18 07-08/18, 09-12/18 01/19, 02/19, 03/19 04/19, 05/19, 06/19 07-08/19, 09-10/19 11-12/19, 01-02/20 03-04/20, 05-06/20 07-08/20, 09-10/20 11-12/20, 01/21

Smazání fotografie Adolf Zika 02.jpg

Ahoj, ráda bych jménem Adolfa Ziky požádala o smazání této fotografie, neboť má na ní práva a nepřeje si, aby byla volně k užívání. Děkuji a přeji hezký den

Smazání revizí

Ahoj, prosím tě, odmaž staré revize u File:WM CZ - Výroční zpráva 2013.pdf (na základě tohoto). Díky. --Harold (talk) 15:26, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Ahoj, odmazal jsem. --Podzemnik (talk) 16:39, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Lucerna.JPG

Ahoj, chtěl jsem vrátit původní verzi "lucerna.jpg" ale ještě víc jsem to zamotal. Mohl by ses prosím na to podívat a případně to opravit - na původní verzi, která jak doufám byla jediná správná. Díky moc --Krochoman (talk) 08:36, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Teď se na to dívám a zdá se to být ok?! V Chromu se mi pořád zobrazuje, že tam zůstala "květinová" verze; ve FF je tam zpátky verze lucerny :( Tak to snad bude dobré. Pěkný den. --Krochoman (talk) 08:43, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Ahoj, vypadá to, že je všechno v pořádku. Pokud ze zobrazuje stará verze, zkus aktualizovat cache nebo otevřít stránku v anonymním okně. S pozdravem, --Podzemnik (talk) 10:05, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Oměj tuhý moravský

Ahoj, snad jsem se dobře díval a můžeš pořád do OTRS. Mrkni se na ticket:2014052710017969, který se týká tvých fotek v Category:Aconitum firmum moravicum. Prý se určitě jedná o Category:Aconitum variegatum, z článku na cs: fotku odstraním a případně ty fotky přejmenuj/překategorizuj. --Harold (talk) 17:01, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Ahoj, mrkal jsem. Jasný, přejmenuju, díky za upozornění, --Podzemnik (talk) 18:34, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

File:RIAN archive 888102 Soviet cosmonauts.jpg

Ahoj Podzemnik. Môžeš prosím po mne opraviť ten výrez na pôvodný obrázok? Sledovala som jednu diskusiu na sk wiki sk:Diskusia s redaktorom:Sudo77(new)#cropped image, iniciatívne som riešila, ale už som myslím zabudla, ako to urobiť správne :-) Ďakujem. --Bubamara (talk) 09:07, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Ahoj Bubamaro, jasně, vrátil jsem. Může to ale udělat každý editor, dole u souboru jsou verze. Měj se pěkně, --Podzemnik (talk) 13:15, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Mne tá možnosť vrátenia neskôr /po prvotnej panike :-) / došla, ale radšej som to už nechala na teba. Ešte raz vďaka. --Bubamara (talk) 19:19, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Fotky z výletu

Ahoj, mám na Tebe dotaz. V kategorii Category:Černé_jezero jeden uživatel nahrál celý svůj výlet na Šumavě, přičemž je tam možná kolem stovky fotografií, které s jezerem nemají nic společného. Chtěl jsem některé přesunout do kategorie Šumava, nicméně je tam spousta momentek nějakého štěrku a neidentifikovatelných věcí, pro které mě žádná kategorie nenapadá. Pokus o odebrání jediné kategorie mi redakční systém zamítl s tím, že jde o škodlivou činnost. Co se s podobnými případy tady dělá? Dík za radu, --de:Benutzer:Sasik 05:28, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Ahoj, popravdě mi není známo, že by na toto byl nějaký standardizovaný postup. První, co bych udělal, je napsal dotyčnému, jestli se třeba nespletl a snažil se mu dát trochu osvěty toho, co Commons je a k čemu slouží. Pak by třeba dal k smazání některé z nesmyslných fotek podnět sám. Lepší radu pro Tebe bohužel v tuto chvíli nemám. S pozdravem, --Podzemnik (talk) 11:16, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Smazání fotky

Ahoj, prosím Tě, chtěl bych nechat smazat fotku kvůli ochraně soukromí, omylem jsem vyfotil a nahrál hlídače v kostele a v tom množství mi unikla. Jedná se o toto - File:Kutnohorsko 2014 Barbora uvnitř 17.JPG. Díky --Hadonos (talk) 13:10, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Ahoj, asi sis všiml že smazal Mormegil :) --Podzemnik (talk) 11:16, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Oslo, VG statue.JPG

File:Oslo, VG statue.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

46.9.95.234 22:58, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

De-adminship warning

Dear Podzemnik/archive4, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2014 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 19:54, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Říše Ming

Hello Podzemnik, I am a user from nl.wiki and much impressed by your map Říše Ming. Historically correct and I especially like the faded out borders, which reflect the shifting situation at the time. I would like to add the map to nl:Ming-dynastie, but I am afraid the Czech names wouldn't work for a Dutch-speaking audience and I don't have the skills to make another version. Would you be willing to make a nl version of this map? Of course I would supply all the necessary translations. Your help would be much appreciated. Best regards, Joplin (talk) 18:39, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi Joplin, I'm happy to hear you like my map. Actually my Chinese maps were created under supervision from User:Jann, who is very good in Chinese history. Please, try to write him, I'm afraid I'm too busy in a real life recently and I won't be able to work on your map in the following weeks. All the best, --Podzemnik (talk) 10:09, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi Podzemnik, thanks for your quick response. I will try my luck with Jann. All the best, Joplin (talk) 12:02, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Category:Zábřeh_na_Moravě_Castle

Zábřeh na Moravě Castle has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Ferziks (talk) 07:51, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Priečne sedlo

Ahoj, narazil jsem na tvoji sadu fotek File:Priečne sedlo, Vysoké Tatry (1).JPG, File:Priečne sedlo, Vysoké Tatry (2).JPG a File:Priečne sedlo, Vysoké Tatry (3).JPG. Podle mne jde ale o výstup do Sedielka, ne do Priečneho sedla. Mohl by ses na to prosím podívat a případně upravit popisky a přejmenovat fotografie? U ostatních si nejsem úplně jistý, ale na té druhé jsou jasně vidět serpentinovité schody, které vedou právě do Sedielka. A ty fotografie byly pořízeny časově blízko u sebe. Díky. S pozdravem --11:04, 4 September 2014 (UTC), Utar (talk)
P.S.: Teď jsem si všiml ještě i File:Priečne_sedlo,_Vysoké_Tatry.JPG, File:Priečne sedlo, Vysoké Tatry (4).JPG, File:Priečne sedlo, Vysoké Tatry (5).JPG. Číslo pět je opět jasně Sedielko.

Ahoj, jo, máš pravdu, je to Sedielko, díky moc za upozornění. Vše opraveno. Měj se pěkně a ať to v Tatrách šlape! --Podzemnik (talk) 08:09, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Budova Banskobystrického samosprávneho kraja.JPG

Ahoj Podzemnik. User:Natuur12 zmazal File:Budova Banskobystrického samosprávneho kraja.JPG, obrázok ale nahral samotný autor. Veľmi tomu nerozumiem, môžeš pomôcť prosím. Vďaka. --Bubamara (talk) 14:53, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Image is published elswhere before being uploaded to Commons so evidence of permission has to be send to com:OTRS. Natuur12 (talk) 15:08, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Ahoj, no asi to fakt vypadá na copyvio, třeba na tom odkazu, co tady postoval Natuur12, je ten obrázek v článku z 29. srpna, zatímco zde byl nahrán 5. září. --Podzemnik (talk) 07:59, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Áno, prvý pohľad hovorí, že ide o copyvio, nahral to ale autor pán Ján Krošlák, ktorý pracuje pre denník SME. Sama som ho oslovila po tom, ako boli podobné jeho fotografie použité v tomto článku, či by ich nenahral do databázy na commons. Chybu som zrejme urobila ja, keď som si neuvedomila, že môže nahrať aj rovnaké fotografie, aké použili v článku, a teda že ide aj o dielo, publikované predtým inde. Takže ho upozorním, aby poslal vyhlásenie do OTRS. Bol to celkom rýchly proces od označenia šablónou copyvio po zmazanie, autor aj keby bol chcel, veľa času na reakciu, či nápravu nemal :-) --Bubamara (talk) 15:38, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Jasný, copyvia jsou určena k rychlému smazání. Příště stačí tam umístit šablonu {{OP}} a nejlíp po nahrání uvědomit někoho z OTRS. Měj se pěkně, --Podzemnik (talk) 06:39, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Rychvald, kostel svaté Anny.JPG

Hi, I wanted to make a remark, that File:Rychvald, kostel svaté Anny.JPG is not a Saint Anne Catholic church in Rychvald. The Saint Anne church lies a few hundres meters to south, 49°51′53.7″N, 18°22′34.1″E. Regards, D T G (talk) 20:59, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Category:Sculpture Park in Hradiště - this sculptures are in Těrlicko-Hradiště, not in Koňákov, I presumed to place your photos in that category. Regards, D T G (talk) 20:07, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi D T G, thanks for your messages. I've just fixed the name of the church. Many thanks for your interested in categorization! Regards, --Podzemnik (talk) 06:36, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Zmazanie súborov

Ahoj Podzemnik. Dostal som na teba ako správcu z cs wiki tip a preto by som sa ťa chcel spýtať: mohol by si prosím odstrániť z commons všetky mnou nahraté súbory? Ďakujem. --Japonský-bonsaj (talk) 13:39, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Ahoj, smáznul jsem. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:45, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Jana Kratochvílová.jpg

Ahoj, podívej se prosím na tuhle fotku File:Jana Kratochvílová.jpg. Původní by mohla být odsud. Díky a pěkný den. --Krochoman (talk) 23:56, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Ahoj, díky za upozornění, otapetoval jsem sobour i diskusi uploadera. Měj se pěkně, --Podzemnik (talk) 08:51, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Your email regarding Toma646

This individual was blocked here for uploading an image that said "kiss my ass" in Czech, and then using it for cross-wiki vandalism on cs.wiki. He then threatened on Meta to sock around the block here, which he did with atleast 2 more accounts. He accompanied this with taunting of me and was warned by a steward/admin on Meta to stop the behavior. He said vandalism is "fun" to him. This happened less than a week ago. I absolutely object to any unblock of him here on Commons, especially this soon after threats of socking which were acted upon, cross-wiki vandalism, and cross-wiki trolling of a blocking admin. INeverCry 03:31, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Ondra71538

Zdravím, mohu se zeptat, proč byly smazány tyto moje soubory? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Ondra71538 Šlo o screen shoty z programu a mnou vytvořená díla, programu jsem navíc distributor. Ve videu byla použita hudba, ale jde o nahrávku, která již je vzhledem ke stáří volně šiřitelná (Vltava - konkrétně bych musel dohledat rok a autora). Nevím jestli jsem jen špatně něco nevyplnil, nebo tak, ale stránka o programu bez obrázků pak je taková poloviční. Píšu na popud INeverCry. Moc děkuju!

Dobrý den, jak bylo řečeno v žádosti o smazání, soubory byly neurčitého původu. Na Commons mohou být jen soubory volně šiřitelné (viz Commons:Licencování) a proto se snažíme na autorská práva dávat co největší pozor a když si nejsme 100% jisti původem, raději se soubory mažou. Vámi nahrané soubory bych mohl obnovit, pokud byste dodal patřičný souhlas přes naše centrum - viz Commons:OTRS/cs. S pozdravem, --Podzemnik (talk) 23:33, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Ahoj, mám u copyvií nejasnost: na wiki je nutné připojit informaci o stránce, kde se původní text nachází; na commons se to v návrhu na smazání neuvádí? Kdyby například uploader toto copyvio v OTRS označil jako vlastní dílo, bude někoho zajímat, že původní je tady? --Krochoman (talk) 09:56, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Typicky to ověření probíhá tak, že se člověk ověřující původnost souboru podívá na e-mailovou adresu, ze které byl e-mail poslán. Jestli např. obrázek pochází z Ihned.cz a ověřovací e-mail byl poslán z adresy jmeno@ihned.cz, může být e-mail považován za věrohodný a autorství se potvrdí. V případě, že existují další pochybnosti o autorovi / původnosti souboru atp., typicky se OTRS dobrovolníci ptají po dalších informacích / žádají přeposlání téhož e-mailu z jiné adresy apod. Toto je zcela obecný a korektní postup, hodně záleží na OTRS dobrovolníkovi, jak situaci vyhodnotí. Např. v případě, který jsi zmínil, bych patrně postupoval tak, že bych tam tu OTRS šablonu dal a jako licenci uvedl {{PD-CzechGov}}. Měj se pěkně, --Podzemnik (talk) 18:48, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Co s velmi nekvalitním souborem

Ahoj, ještě s tímhle si dovolím otravovat. Soubor File:IMAG0916.jpg se asi nekorektně uploadoval, takže informační hodnota se mi zdá nulová. Jaký je postup, když můžem stěží předpokládat, že uploader novou verzi nepřidá? A) nechat to být; B) vložit šablonou "Low quality"; C) navrhnout ke smazání (jak?). Obávám se, že A) bude správně, ale nedalo mi to. Díky za odpovědi, ahoj --Krochoman (talk) 09:56, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Ahoj, otravuj dle libosti, od toho mám práva správce, abych byl otravován dle libosti ostatními! U takovýchto evidentně poškozených souborů lze mazat hned (viz Commons:Deletion policy#General: speedy deletion, sekce "Files", první odrážka), když jsi nejsi jist, navrhni na smazání. V obojím případě se už s tím správci nějak poperou. Každopádně díky za upozornění, každý obrázek, jehož status se vyřeší, je krok k lepšímu světu. --Podzemnik (talk) 18:40, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Feilding photos

Just so you know, I've taken your Fielding photos and added them to a page on the German WP. Very useful to have your photos for this purpose! Schwede66 17:43, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Cool, thanks for the message! Maybe you would be interested in my photos from Shannon, I think I took all cultural heritage sites there. You can find all of my heritage sites here. Greetings, --Podzemnik (talk) 05:25, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

You may have spotted that I've dealt with all your New Zealand heritage-listed items yesterday. Apart from it being great that we have all these photos on Commons, I wanted to let you know that you have a very good eye for composition. I've been slowly populating the German heritage lists (link above) and where there are categories, I've scanned all the photos to pick the best one. Almost without fail, I picked your photo from each of the category entries, obviously not knowing beforehand who the photographer was before I made the choice. Well done! Is there a barn stars system on Commons? I'm asking because you deserve one. Schwede66 21:23, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your words, Schwede66, that's really nice of you. I'm not sure about the barnstars system here, your message and using the photos is rewarding enough! Thanks again. Have a nice day, --Podzemnik (talk) 01:42, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

I've just seen in another post that you live in New Zealand these days (lucky us; so do I) and that you are originally from Brno. I happen to have a good friend who is originally from there; it's a small world, eh? Anyway, if you happen to travel within New Zealand and feel inclined to take photos of heritage sites listed with Heritage New Zealand, would you please draw my attention to it? I'd like to process those for the German Wikipedia list pages. Schwede66 18:41, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Yup, lucky us. I was also "lucky" enough to meet a kiwi girl who wants to move to Europe for a while so I'm moving over there soon. I'd like to take some photos of Heritage New Zealand list in the winter. Nowadays I just tramp and work! I'll definitely let you know when I upload something. Cheers, --Podzemnik (talk) 06:34, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Michaela Káčerková

Ahoj, prosím Tě na wikipedii jsem zběhlý, ale tady na Commons se moc neorientuji. Nevím jak se řeší případy, kdy se u nahraných fotografií jedná o pravděpodobné porušení autorského práva. Jedná se o File:Michaela Káčerková.JPG. Uživatel tento biografický článek na wikipedii založil před osmi měsíci. Jednalo se o copyvio a protože nedodal potvrzení, článek byl smazán. Nyní článek založil opětovně a znovu text zkopíroval ze stránek této osobnosti. Předpokládám, že i výše citovaný soubor je zkopírován a na Commons nahrán bez vědomí skutečného autora. Jukneš na to. Děkuji. --Romanzazvorka (talk) 12:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Ahoj, dovol mi otázku: na wiki nestačí (jak pro použití textu, tak obrázku), když je v patičce webu té varhanice uvedeno "Obsah je licencován dle GFDL a CC-BY-SA 3.0"? --Krochoman (talk) 15:18, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Ahoj, zde se to řeší šablonou {{Copyvio|1= případný důvod|source= zdroj}}. Mějte se oba pěkně, --Podzemnik (talk) 18:13, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Ahoj Podzemniku, podívej se prosím na tohle OTRS, jestli by to bylo dostatečné i pro File:Michaela Káčerková.JPG. Díky --Krochoman (talk) 21:04, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Ahoj, popravde by to na to napasovat moc ani neslo. Napsal jsem ji e-mail a poprosil o uvolneni i dane fotograie. O prubehu budu informovat. Pekny den, --Podzemnik (talk) 22:59, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Stale bez odpovedi. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:01, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Co dodat? Třeba se ten uploader vyčerpal na cs.wiki. Každopádně díky za snahu. :) --Krochoman (talk) 01:47, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mount Taranaki, New Zealand (05) - Northern Road to the top.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice view, good composition and light. DoF is shallow though due to f/4.5 and it is mostly the foreground which is in focus. I would have gone for f/7 if it was me to get more DOF, still OK for QI, I think. --Slaunger 09:28, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Slaunger, f4.5 it's fine for a bridge camera. f7 will cause diffraction. The upper softness is due to air temperature differences and distance imo. --Kadellar 10:50, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Kadellar: You are probably correct, thanks for the heads-up. -- Slaunger 11:28, 2 May 2015 (UTC) *  Comment Thanks both of you for your review, I really appreciate it! --Podzemnik 04:39, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mount Taranaki, New Zealand (08) - Northern Road to the top.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Even, when the sky is noisy. Third opinion appreciated! --Hubertl 20:07, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruahine Mountains, along the Daphne Spur (19).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and interesting. --Milseburg 12:15, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruahine Mountains, along the Daphne Spur (15).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good work, fine motives! --Hubertl 08:17, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruahine Mountains, along the Daphne Spur (17).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Interesting motif. --Milseburg 12:15, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Adam Eck - Allegory of vanity.jpg

Ahoj, mohl bys prosím smazat staré revize tohoto souboru. Nedostal jsem k fotce z muzea OTRS a pak jsem na to zapomněl. Dominikmatus (talk) 17:11, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Ahoj, smáznul jsem. --Podzemnik (talk) 06:30, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hector River.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Good but, must connect the scope to the category that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 12 August 2015 (UTC) ** Comment Fixed I think. --Podzemnik (talk) 07:59, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:14, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jean11 (talk) 14:02, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mt Hector, Southern Crossing, Tararuas, New Zealand (14).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:08, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wellington, Polish children of Pahiatua Memorial, May 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:04, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wellington, Beehive, May 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:04, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wellington, Cenotaph, May 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:04, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Fotografie Slavkovská dolina

Pán kolega. Všetky fotografie, ktoré ste s názvom Slavkovská dolina ( vo Vysokých Tatrách) vložili do Wikimedie Commons sú nesprávne pomenované. Slavkovská dolina vyzerá úplne inak a je inde situovaná. Všetky tieto fotografie sú z úbočia Slavkovského štítu, lepšie povedané z jeho južnej strany. Je to všetko pomýlené. A , zdá sa, že to už nikdy neopravíte. Mýlite ľudí, ktorý vo Wikimédii Commons hľadajú fotografie s týmto heslom!!!!!!!!!!!! Tatransky (talk) 13:57, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Dobrý den, díval jsem se na to, všechno to jsou fotografie z Národní přírodní rezervace Slavkovská dolina. Aby to nebylo matoucí, vytvořil jsem kategorii Category:Slavkovská dolina (national nature reserve), soubory tam přesunul a upravil jejich popisky. Příště mi klidně můžete psát s jedním, případně třemi vykřičníky, sdělení mi bude jasné i tak, stejně jako když mi napíšete jednou. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:19, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Slavkovská dolina

In the category Tatra is a huge number of photos - many thousands. I put a lot of work in their arrangement. Your categorization is totally incompatible with the established category Tatra Mountains. Plants and animals are thousands of species. Maybe you do not know, but species of plants and animals living in the Tatras are thousands. If each valley in the Tatra Mountains associate the thousands of species of plants and animals that there would monstrosity. Plants in your photos are very common, growing in almost every valley in the Tatra Mountains and can be inserted into each valley and each summit.

Yelloowstone a bad example. This reserve is not only a national park. In the Tatras, we have category Tatra National Park (It is badly categorized and can be done in the order). In the Tatras does not make sense to create a category for reserves - all this is a national park. In each category, the reserve would be basically the same species of plants and animals. It is meaningless to the category Tatra National Park dispose of thousands of species of plants and animals that live there - just the most typical of the Tatra mountains

To collective categories covering the peaks, valleys, lakes and other added category of reserve Valley Sławkowska. It should be a non-existent category of reserves in the Tatras. This category does not. Automatic translationSelso (talk) 08:21, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Your categorization is wrong. Example: this image it is not Slavkovská valley, only Anemone alpina

W kategorii Tatry jest ogromna ilość zdjęć - wiele tysięcy. Włożyłem ogromną pracę w ich uporządkowanie. Twoja kategoryzacja jest zupełnie niezgodna z ustaloną dla kategorii Tatra Mountains. Może o tym nie wiesz, ale gatunków roślin i zwierząt żyjących w Tatrach są tysiące. Mają swoje kategorie i nie należy ich włączać do kategorii geograficznych. Gdybyśmy do każdej doliny w Tatrach włączali tysiące gatunków roślin i zwierząt to powstałoby monstrum. Rośliny na twoich zdjęciach są bardzo pospolite, rosną w każdej niemal dolinie w Tatrach i można je wstawić do każdej doliny i do każdego szczytu.

Yelloowstone to zły przykład. To nie rezerwat, tylko park narodowy. W Tatrach mamy kategorię Tatra National Park (jest żle skategoryzowana i też należy w niej zrobić porządek). W Tatrach nie ma sensu tworzyć kategorii dla rezerwatów – to wszystko jest park narodowy. W każdej kategorii rezerwatu powtarzałyby się te w zasadzie te same gatunki roślin i zwierząt. Nie ma też sensu do kategorii Tatra National Park wrzucać tysięcy gatunków roślin i zwierząt, które w nim żyją – wystarczy tylko te najbardziej dla Tatr charakterystyczne.

Do zbiorowych kategorii obejmujących szczyty, doliny, jeziora i inne dodałeś kategorię rezerwat Dolina Sławkowska. Powinien on być w nieistniejącej kategorii Rezerwaty w Tatrach. Takiej kategorii nie ma jednak sensu tworzyć. Selso (talk) 08:21, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Twoja kategoryzacja jest błędna. Przykład: to zdjęcie to nie jest Slavkovská dolina, tylko Anemone alpina

Hi Selso,

thanks for your explanation. You don't have to write me in Polish, I don't understand it. I'm not sure what you're trying to say here.

1) Look at Category:Slavkovská dolina - 90 % of pictures are NOT from Slavkovská dolina, but from National nature reserve Slavkovská dolina. Did you look at the map I sent you? Slavkovská dolina covers only about 10 % of National nature reserve Slavkovská dolina

2) You said "In the Tatras does not make sense to create a category for reserves - all this is a national park" - I'm sorry to say that, but I don't agree. It matters, in Slovakia and the Czech Republic it's normal that one nature reserve is inside the other one. We also have specific articles about these reservations. For example, have a look at:

• sk:Národná prírodná rezervácia Kôprová dolina
• cs:Kôprová dolina (národní přírodní rezervace)

We even have some Good articles about natural reserves located within the national parks and we do need categories for them. It doesn't have to "destroy" your categorization, these categories can live next to each other without any issues :) Is this explanation clear? Thanks for all the work work for Commons though, it's great! --Podzemnik (talk) 01:58, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Categories

• How do you write to me write on my talk page, not on her.

• sk: Národná Prírodné rezervácia Kôprová valley - This page on Wikipedia, not on the commons.

• cs: Kôprová Valley (Národní přírodní rezervace) - same

• Such categories on commons are meaningless: because they can be almost anything; thousands of species of plants and animals. For example: then recognize that this Calocera in the Silesian Beskid? - The same image can be in each category of geographical Europe - because Calocera is common throughout Europe. In your photo in any way it is impossible to distinguish that he is just in the Silesian Beskid. Animals and plants have their own categories. Selso (talk) 19:37, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

• exist in the commons categories of reserves - but are these photographs mainly of land, and plant and animal species only the most specific to the species reserve. If it is not - it is wrong

These photos document nature of Silesian Beskids. I don't think that it's something "meaningless" - actually it's the most important part. Regards, --Podzemnik (talk) 20:29, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mt Holdsworth - Jumbo Circuit, Tararua Range, New Zealand 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:58, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mt Holdsworth - Jumbo Circuit, Tararua Range, New Zealand 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Sharpness could be better. --XRay 07:09, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Cycling track Brno

Hello, Podzemnik, I have seen that you uploaded some photos from buildings in Brno. Do you live there? As the European cycling track championships will take place at the cycling track in Brno I would like to have some photos of it. Can you help me? --Nicola (talk) 15:36, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi Nicola, I'm sorry but I don't live there anymore. I've been living in New Zealand since 2014. Try to ask Harold, I think he still live in Brno. Regards, --Podzemnik (talk) 07:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

This is really far :) Anyway, there are cycling tracks in New Zealand, too, may be this could be a task for you then :) Regards, --Nicola (talk) 07:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

De-adminship warning

Dear Podzemnik, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2016 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 22:19, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Tararua huts

Hi Michal, short time ago you had been again in the Tararuas? I was there Dec '15, Jan and Feb 16 and I made many more pics of huts.
To have a better description of the categories, I am introducing a template which cares fore some better format. The docu of it will be {{TararuaHut/doc}}; if you have some better ideas, or if you want to contribute to the development, you may just give me a note. Greetings, sarang♥사랑 08:22, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Sarang!

Oh man, I've just checked your photo contributions to Tararuas and it's awesome. Especially this or this is so valuable! Great job!

I go tramping quite often but not only to Tararuas, I go to Ruahines or Kawekas too.

I checked the tample. Good idea! Don't you wanna do it for all the NZ huts? I'm just not sure about information like number of tickets. Isn't it more likely for Wikipedia? For me, category on Commons is more or less just a technical thing which connects together pictures about the same topic and Wikipedia is about providing more insights. Regards, --Podzemnik (talk) 20:23, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Michal,

sure I have somewhere also pictures from the Ruahines, Kawekas (and Kaimanawas, and the Taranaki and much others) - I will give it a look.

At the moment the Tararua huts are so special that I made a specific template for them; may be later it will appear useful to either have one template for all NZ huts, or get another solution.

Ticket numbers and other DoC specifications may be subject to change; but the hut name in the headline can be used as a link to the appropriate DoC web page.

Into the bush I am carrying only small photographic equipment as a simple compact-digicam. Pictures of only a few hundred KB give enough information, other contributors may produce the great quality...

In any case a category in the Commons should provide some essential information what it collects or connects. Always when I create new categories for e.g. Valid SVG I add descriptions about their usage.

I am glad that at least some pictures of the Tararuas are collected - it is quite another thing to write articles in the different Wikipedias! Or may be in Wikitravel?

Anyway, as long as these deeper insights are missing the subcategories can give some impression.

Regards, sarang♥사랑 05:57, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Tararua huts template - OK! Yep, I think that Wikitravel is a good place to write about the huts but I'm not keen writer anymore. I'm doing my pictures and that's it. Have a good day, --Podzemnik (talk) 20:14, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your file

Hi Michal, I am not sure whether it is now better: I uploaded another version to your file Tararua Range, New Zealand (01).JPG. If you don't like it, just delete it! sarang♥사랑 16:22, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi Sarang! Well, thanks for this, but I don't think it was the best idea :) I didn't take that picture and I was there as an author. And honestly I like mine better because it's not that long and can be displayed as a typical picture (almost a square.). In generall, any new version like this, should be upload as a new picture... There are quite good reasons for this, see COM:CROP. Eg. somewhere on a blog from a local tramping club can be a link to my version saying "Our inscription in May 2015" etc. etc. I hope it's OK with you! Regards, --Podzemnik (talk) 20:10, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Of course it's OK. It would have been also OK when you just had deleted the new file; now after the reverting everybody can see both versions… Thank you for explaining your reasons and for the link to COM:CROP. -- sarang♥사랑 10:43, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Prosím o přejmenování

Ahoj, prosím o přejmenování těchto fotek na správné datum. Díky Dominikmatus (talk) 19:43, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Ahoj, kolega obstaral. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:55, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Tišnov, památný strom u červé značky do Vevrské Bítýšky.JPG

---

Hello, Podzemnik!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

--Gampe (talk) 05:55, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

ticket:2016040110011805 and Category:Elpida scanning workshop 2016

Hi, Podzemnik. Would you consider having a look at ticket:2016040110011805? The issue is that many of the files in Category:Elpida scanning workshop 2016 are derivative works depicting photographs whose copyright status is unknown, as well as copyrighted software interfaces. A language barrier is preventing me from getting across the concept of derivative works, and I'm sensing rising frustration on the part of the correspondent. Thanks! --Rrburke (talk) 11:55, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi Rrburke, this is quite sensitive case.

The pictures look very old, probably before the Second World War, but that's not the main argument for keeping them: the main argument would be Commons:De minimis. Basically the old photos are not the main subjects on most of the images here on Commons, similar rule can be applied to the copyrighted software too. From my perspective the problematic images would be the following:

• File:Elpida scanning workshop 2016 (3).jpg
• File:Elpida scanning workshop 2016 (7).jpg
• File:Elpida scanning workshop 2016 (6).jpg

For the first two we won't get a permission and I think we can just delet them straight away. For the last one (with the old photo) we might get a permission. But, to be honest, it seems like it took a lot of effort to one of the most valuable editor from Czech Wikipedia to get a permission from the author of the photos and if you really insist that the photo can't be here, I'd rather delete than one too than to ask for a permission again. Asking for a permission would mean write an email to Czech Wikipedian --> he would write to the workshop organizer ---> he might just get confused and desperated and if not, he would just be looking for an author of the photo among his clients which would take ages... Basically I think it's just much effort and labour for 1 photo which is not that much important for us. I believe we have other, more important issues here to deal with. All the best, --Podzemnik (talk) 06:46, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Statistika návštěvnosti

Ahoj, co se to změnilo na české wikipedii, tak u souborů na commons nefunguje. Jedině že si otevřu statistiku na české wikipedii, zadám tam název souboru (obrázku) a ručně přepíši cs.wikipedia.org na commons.wikimedia.org. Můžeš s tím něco udělat? Dík! --PetrS. (talk) 10:40, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Ahoj, co nejsem aktivní na české Wikipedii, jako dřív, tak jsem trochu ztratil přehled. Co myslíš statistikou návštěvnosti? Link prosím :) --Podzemnik (talk) 21:05, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Tady tyto odkazy u obrázků na commons nefungují. Na české wikipedii fungují tyto odkazy bez problémů. --PetrS. (talk) 12:27, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Zkoušel jsem zjistit, proč to nefunguje, bylo mi řečeno, že patrně výpadek serveru. Btw už to funguje ː) --Podzemnik (talk) 02:06, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Nefunguje to a našel jsem chybu. Anglická verze nabízí novou i starou statistiku návštěvnosti, česká jen tu starou. Anglická odkazuje správně na http://stats.grok.se/commons.m/201601/File:Alena_Scheinostova_2015.jpg, česká chybně na http://stats.grok.se/commons.m/201605/File:Alena_Scheinostova_2015.jpg --PetrS. (talk) 12:45, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Hmm tak to je možná chyba někde ve starém odkazu v české verzi? Možná Mormegil by mohl vědět. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:32, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Odkaz opraven. --Mormegil (talk) 09:50, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Díky! --Podzemnik (talk) 20:02, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Autorizace starších nahraných souborů

Děkuji Vám za upozornění, snažil jsem se u jednotlivých souborů vybrat vhodné licence a zaslal mail OTRS na Vaše jméno: autorizace. Nevím, udělal-li jsem vše správně... Případně budu pokračovat. Vjem (talk) 14:55, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Díky moc, paráda, to fotek jsem vložil upozornění. S pozdravem, --Podzemnik (talk) 02:13, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

OTRS - kryt 10-Z

Ahoj, mohl bys zkontrolovat emaily OTRS? Mělo by být povolení k fotkám v Category:Nuclear shelter 10-Z. Možná bych i přejmenoval tu kategorii na Air raid shelter 10-Z. Díky. Dominikmatus (talk) 22:34, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Ahoj, Michal Bělka to před pár dny ošéfoval. S pozdravem, --Podzemnik (talk) 00:34, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Už jsem si všiml. :) Dominikmatus (talk) 08:58, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Statistika

Zdravím, zjistil jsem, že nefunguje odkaz na statistiku návštěv, pokud o zobrazení žádám v českojazyčném (vlastním) nastavení. Někde bude nějaký bug v internacionalizaci stránky. Mám však pocit, že to docela nedávno fungovalo. Nemůžete na to mrknout?--Dendrofil (talk) 03:05, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Plha se hlásí. :D (Koukni se o tři odstavce výše.)--PetrS. (talk) 07:03, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Mormegil vás zachránil. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:02, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Označení obrázku File:Vlasta Suková.jpg

Dobrý den, obdržel jsem od Vás zprávu ohledně doplnění informací k obrázku "Vlasta Suková.jpg". Bohužel jsem nepochopil, co a jakým způsobem mám upravit. Tuto fotografii vlastním ve svém rodinném archivu. Na wikipedii jsem nahrál její elektronickou kopii primárně za účelem doplnění stránky "Vlasta Suková" a zároveň jí přidělil licenci "CC BY-SA 4.0". Poraďte mi prosím, jaké úpravy mám provést, aby bylo vše v pořádku. Předem děkuji, Antonín Adámek

Dobrý den, dík za zprávu. Jde o to, že fotografii vyfotil patrně někdo jiný, než Vy, a Vy jí tedy nemůžete uvolnit pod svobodnou licencí, leda byste vlastnil práva k fotografii (např. byl Vlastiným dědicem). Možná jím opravdu jste, nicméně podle jména jsem to nemohl rozklíčovat. S pozdravem, --Podzemnik (talk) 21:44, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Děkuji za vysvětlení. Fotografii jsem zveřejnil se souhlasem syna paní Vlasty Sukové. Navrhuji tedy, že tuto fotografii smažu a pana Suka požádám, aby ji nahrál ještě jednou (uvolnil pod svobodnou licencí) svým jménem. Bude to prosím takto v pořádku?--Antonin Adamek (talk) 14:17, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Dobrý den, stačilo by, kdyby nám pan Suk poslal na info-cs@wikimedia.org povolení tohoto typu. Stačí nahradit "autor fotografií" za "oprávněný dědic / vykonavatel práv" nebo něco podobného. Mějte se pěkně, --Podzemnik (talk) 21:23, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Díky moc, vyřešeno. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:31, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Barnstar

Thank you Podzemnik. I'm working in the shade hoping that one day, all these uploads will be usefull to someone! Cheers, --Cephas (talk) 17:38, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

You're definitely not working in the shade and the day when your uploads are very useuful is already here! Cheers, --Podzemnik (talk) 20:19, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Balajijagadesh

Hi, you'd closed this DR but it seems two files were accidentally not deleted: File:Samuthirakani.jpg, File:Dhanush Missile.jpg. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 06:53, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Oh, thanks heaps for reminding me. I got some technical issues with the DR closing gandget. It seems to be working now. Have a good day SpacemanSpiff! Regards, --Podzemnik (talk) 07:20, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

File:X0001 Regeln Einhorn2 blaugrün türkis ohne Rand 10x10 groß.png

Hello Podzemnik, you deleted at June 18 this file and I don't know the reason. I substituted it with the File "X0001 Regeln Einhorn blaugrün türkis ohne Rand 10x10 groß.png" at July 4th, but my site "Das Große Schach 10x10" is not sighted and uploaded. Please tell me, wat's wrong. Schach100 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schach100 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi Schach100, I've deleted the picture because you asked for deletion. You nominated the file for deletion shortly after upload so I figured that you uploaded it by mistake. I've checked and it's exactly the same file like File:X0001 Regeln Einhorn blaugrün türkis ohne Rand 10x10 groß.png. Regards, --Podzemnik (talk) 04:58, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello Podzemnik,

thanks for the quick answer, it was my mistake.

Schach100 — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2003:86:6D5A:DE08:507F:9FF9:898D:349C (talk) 23:49, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

The above comment was not made from the account mentioned in the last line. Schach100, did you make that comment while logged out? KSFT (talk) 00:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi Schach100, so is everything OK? :) --Podzemnik (talk) 05:02, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello Podzemnik, yes, everything is ok. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schach100 (talk • contribs) 23:12, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Fotky uživatele User:Zdekapr53

Zdravím. Můžeš se podívat na nynější a případně i už smazané obrázky uživatele User:Zdekapr53? Možná že o autorských právech nemá až tak velké povědomí, ale zase bych ho nepodezíral, že by ty fotky, na kterých je převážně jeho vlastní rodina, nebyly jeho. Nebo přinejmenším v rámci rodiny. Můžeš mu případně vysvětlit, co se po něm chce? Já to sám moc nechápu. Své autorství uvedl a tématicky a dobou vzniku ty fotky celkem odpovídají tomu, co o nich prohlašuje. --ŠJů (talk) 03:24, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Už jsem tady stokrát vysvětloval, že jsem si špatně zvolil to "Zdekapr53". Jsem Zdeněk Horenský a všechny fotky, které jsem uvěřejnil byly moje nebo se souhlasem. Například František Horenský se souhlasem ředitele Slováckého muzea v Uherském Hradišti, poslal jsem dokonce celou kopii jeho mailu na požadovanou adresu. Nemám nejmenší zájem tady klamat ba naopak se snažím věci vylepšovat a doplňovat. Jestli se to někomu nelíbí, nemusím se za každou cenu angažovat. Už jsem doplnil dost věcí bez problémů, budou tedy bez fotografií. Chtěl bych si změnit Zdekapr53 na Zdeněk Horenský a nevím jak na to.--Zdeněk Horenský (talk) 07:50, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Ahoj, díky za upozornění. Mám také problém tomu celému rozumět :) Povolovací mail k File:František Horenský.jpg nám skutečně přišel, nicméně je nedostatečný, tak jsem požádal o upřesnění. Uživatele Zdekapr53 jsem upozornil na slušné mravy. S pozdravem, --Podzemnik (talk) 06:32, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Navrácení souborů

Ahoj, mohl bys obnovit soubory v kategorii Category:Center_for_Early_Medieval_Studies,_Brno. OTRS email by už měl být v systému. Kategorie obsahovala soubory Centrum raně středověkých studií 01.jpg až Centrum raně středověkých studií 10.jpg? Díky. Dominikmatus (talk) 07:56, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Ahoj, díky za zprávu, obnovil jsem. U File:Centrum raně středověkých studií 01.jpg jsem pozměnil autora a datum, snad je to OK. Měj se pěkně, --Podzemnik (talk) 09:45, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red-billed gull, New Zealand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:00, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kelp Gull, Christchurch, New Zaland (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:41, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kelp Gull, Christchurch, New Zaland (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:41, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hluboka Castle during sunset.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 12:52, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cesky Krumlov 2, Czech Republic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Roof could have been sharper, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 16:22, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building at Szent Istvan ter in Budapest, Hungary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:31, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pumpkin fields east of Vienna, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not sure about the tilt, but QI --Poco a poco 08:21, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fence next to Christopher Hut, St James Walkway, New Zealand (52).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:10, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malužín, přírodní rezervace (6).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 06:45, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Detail of the city wall, Levoča, Slovakia 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:57, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of John of Nepomuk - Sosnová, Opava District, Czech Republic 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 17:16, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of John of Nepomuk - Sosnová, Opava District, Czech Republic 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:10, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of John of Nepomuk - Sosnová, Opava District, Czech Republic 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:54, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boardwalk - Jeseniky, Czech Republic 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 10:07, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! National nature reserve Serak-Keprnik - Jeseniky, Czech Republic 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:55, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boundary marker - Jeseniky, Czech Republic 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:56, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiking signs on a wooden stick - Jeseniky, Czech Republic 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:07, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blue arrow - Jeseniky, Czech Republic 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:07, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Cruz, Auditorio de Tenerife (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 18:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Cruz, Auditorio de Tenerife (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:36, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC)