User talk:Wilfredor/Archive/2

/Archive/1

I have moved it because you seem to have accidentally created it in gallery-space.  fetchcomms☛ 21:32, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

New wiktionary logo

Hi, I have started to redrawn File:Wiktionary-logo_wpstyle_redrawn.svg for File:Wiktionary-logo_wpstyle-en_with_transparency.png, so we need text. But it seems really difficult to made it (you could also read Commons:Graphic_Lab/Illustration_workshop#Wiktionary_logo_candidate for more informations) Regards, Otourly (talk) 15:38, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Royal Coat of Arms of the Kingdom of Scotland.svg

Did you mean to add two {{support}} votes here? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 16:47, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Wrist and hand deeper palmar dissection-fr.svg

File:Wrist and hand deeper palmar dissection-fr.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--MAURILBERT (discuter) 18:09, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

La llave

Pues no sé. Supongo que mi criterio es diferente al de la "comunidad" en lo que a FP se refiere. A mi me sigue pareciendo una imagen magnífica, sobre todo por el nivel de detalle que se puede apreciar. Además los votos en contra de alguno sinceramente no lo entiendo: "no enciclopédica" dice. Pues ya me explicará el señor este que imagen más enciclopédica que esta puede haber para ilustrar lo que es una llave de paso. En fin, que me debo estar haciendo mayor xD. Un abrazo. elemaki (talk) 23:54, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Photo request

Hey The Photographer! Is Simon Bolivar Airport convenient to your location?

I put in a photo request for the Conviasa headquarters. They are at: "Av. Intercomunal Aeropuerto Internacional de Maiquetía Edf. Sector 6.3, Zona Estratégica, Lado Este del Aeropuerto Internacional de Maiquetía, Adyacente a Tránsito Terrestre. Venezuela." (From here)

If you want, would you mind photographing the Conviasa building for Wikipedia? Thanks, WhisperToMe (talk) 16:33, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

• Thank you, The Photographer! :)
• I admire how you used your willpower to get those photos taken, even though you don't yet have a camera
• Thank you,
• WhisperToMe (talk) 20:21, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Map_of_Pichilemu.svg

File:Map_of_Pichilemu.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Diego Grez ^{return fire} 23:41, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Lo siento mucho The Photographer... ya que yo mismo te pedí que lo transformaras en SVG... pero me han informado que el permiso del autor del original nunca fué recibido en OTRS... y por eso, es mejor tenerlos borrado. Gracias de nuevo :-) --Diego Grez ^{return fire} 23:42, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

File:GurdjieffJMK.svg

File:GurdjieffJMK.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

smial (talk) 16:10, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

File:The Photographer_thinking.svg

File:The Photographer_thinking.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cholo Aleman (talk) 04:49, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uva de playa (Coccoloba uvifera).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Jebulon 23:11, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Venezuela

Pues Venezuela es sin lugar a dudas una de las deudas (las otras serían Brasil y Colombia) que tengo pendientes con América Latina. Ahora mismo estoy viviendo en Santiago de Chile y estaré aquí al menos dos años, así que espero tener la posibilidad en ese tiempo de acercarme hasta tu país que por lo que mucha gente me ha comentado debe ser impresionante. elemaki (talk) 12:56, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

FP

Hello, Wilfredor/Archive. You have new messages at George Chernilevsky's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

* * * :) * * *

Merry Christmas and happy New Year! I wish You all the best in New year!
--George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:22, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Feliz navidad y próspero año nuevo.

Los Reyes magos en Madrid.

Muchísimas gracias por la "postal navideña multimedia" que me has dejado en mi discu. No sé si lo sabrás pero en España la tradición no es Papá Noel (o el Viejo Pascuero como lo llaman en Chile) sino que allí esperamos hasta el 6 de diciembre que es cuando llegan los Reyes Magos. Mis sinceros deseos de que estos últimos te traigan toda la salud y la felicidad posibles para el 2011 y todos los demás años que están por venir. Un abrazo. --elemaki (talk) 18:15, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:FVA_Logo.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:FVA_Logo.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

BrokenSphere (Talk) 18:31, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

As the template says, I am asking that you confirm permission via OTRS that as the author that you are giving permission for the file's use and license, especially since it is a logo. Unfortunately some uploaders claim copyrighted logos as their own works to upload them to Commons and I feel that confirming permission in this case would help just to be sure. Thanks for your understanding. BrokenSphere (Talk) 21:35, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Dr_G_Domagk.JPG

File:Dr_G_Domagk.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Polarlys (talk) 10:53, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Fahri Koruturk Jean PaulII.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Fahri Koruturk Jean PaulII.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Fahri Koruturk Jean PaulII.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Takabeg (talk) 10:33, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Colibrí_Cola_de_Oro_(Golden-tailed_Sapphire_Hummingbird)_Bigger_File.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Colibrí Cola de Oro (Golden-tailed Sapphire Hummingbird).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2 Aguilas del Zulia vs Leones del Caracas 21-12-2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Small problems (CA, bit noisy) but overall ok. --kallerna 18:43, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Fotos

Buenos días Wilfredo! Me parece excelente que te lances al pico Bolívar y el Humboldt, me encantaría vivir esa experiencia también algun día. Respondiendo a tus peticiones: no he estudiado fotografía así que no tengo material que pueda aconsejarte: lo que aprendí fue en un cursito y de mis amigos. Lo demás experiencia personal. PEro en internet creo que se consigue de todo, basta buscar. Para que aprendas mas, si entiendes ingles, te aconsejo ver todas las votaciones en la pagina de FPCs, ya que no hay mejor maestro que las criticas! Lo de tu camara capaz tengas razon, si hasta a mi me comen por la calidad, teniendo una nikon reflex... son medio coñoemadres, aparte que ese foro esta repleto de alemanes, que los carajos son lo mas perfeccionista que existe.

Lo que he aprendido de ese foro es lo siguiente, te doy estos consejos:

1) composición: regla de los tercios, balances, curvas, no centrar todo, etc 2) Iluminación: siempre toma la cara iluminada del sujeto, asi sea una iglesia, intenta fotografiarla a la hora que le pega el sol en la fachada 3) "Crop": no recortes mucho las fotos, siempre deja un margen equidistante en todos los sentidos, y deja espacio suficiente, deja que el sujeto "respire" 4) Siempre aclara un sujeto y luego tomale la foto. No fotografies una palmera con un cangrejo, con una tipa caminando por la playa. Solo el cangrejo, o la palmera o la playa. 5) intenta usar fondos de un solo color, de ser posible, y poco distrayentes. Esto a veces se logra abriendo el diafragma un poco mas o haciendo zoom mas cercano. 6) No olvides nunca alinear el horizonte. Si luego debes rotar la foto 10 grados, seran muchos pixeles valiosos perdidos. 7) Enfoca siempre al sujeto, y de ser posible, en animales enfoca al ojo del sujeto lo mas que puedas. 8) No excedas profundidad de campo, o todo se vera borroso. 9) Toma varias fotos con exposiciones diferentes y luego eliges la mejor: ojo con las zonas "quemadas" y con las zonas demasiado oscuras: siempre quitan puntos por eso. 10) No sobresatures las fotos cuando las edites: recuerda que es para una enciclopedia y le dan valor a las cosas tal y como son en la realidad. 11) ojo con la reducción de ruido: el ruido son puntos menos, pero el desenfoque son mas puntos menos aun

Como software podras comprar el lightroom por ahi por la central pirateado, de verdad es lo mejor que hay por ahi, es un software muy potente. Y nada, ahorrate unos realitos y comprate una buena reflex con el cupo cadivi de internet por ejemplo! usa el tuyo y el de algun familiar que se yo, y puedes llegar a buenos precios aunque ahora no estoy actualizado en camaras ni nada.

Buen viaje compañero, trae buenas fotos de los andes, mucha suerte en tu expedicion y con el clima, saludos! Ah, no estaria mal una revision de mis dos fotos que estan de candidatas a FP si tienes chance ;) Buenas vacaciones!

Happy New Year!

* * * Happy New 2012 Year! * * *

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:20, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

De moda

Hola Wilfredo!! feliz año hermano, como has estado? Gracias por avisarme del uso sin permiso de mi foto. Lamentablemente estas cosas pasan. Las fotos que colocamos en Wikipedia son una donación, y como mínimo de sentido común sería ueno avisar al autor o almenos mencionarle al pie de la foto. En realidad no me molestaría que coloquen mis fotos siempre y cuando menionen al autor, pero que le vamos a hacer, ya sabemos que hay muchos periodistas y redactores que lo que quieren es conseguir rápido una foto para "matar" el artículo rápido y sin problemas y para eso recurren a la Wiki. No pasa nada, pero gracias por avisar. Wilfredo te deseo un excelente inicio de año 2012 a ti y a tu familia, un abrazo!--Paolo Costa (talk) 19:22, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Wilfredor/Archive!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 14:47, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

• Image:Atardecer playa el Yaque croped.jpg was uncategorized on 20 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:47, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Diagrama de clases Universidad

Hola que tal? queria preguntarte con que programa realizaste el diagrama de clases. Este es mi mail feryor.dev(at) gmail.com gracias

Re: Epale chamo

Wilfredo hola como estás? Tu sugerencia es buena pero no le veo diferencia con mi versión actual jajaja! será que viste una versión vieja de mi página de usuario? Yo antes tenía los enlaces colocados con el http y todo porque no sabía usar bien la wiki, ahora sé un poquito más y los tengo justo como tu me estás recomendando. Me parece excelente que te intereses en edición de fotos, porque cambia radicalmente el modo en que se "venden" las fotos al ojo público. Tu tienes muchas fotos buenas (Venezuela es una fábrica de Featured pictures literalmente y me gustaría ver más candidatos tuyos por ahí). A veces uno toma una foto brutal y a causa de esas aberraciones cromáticas, o ruido, o mal balance de blancos no le llama la atención a la gente, así que sigue aprendiendo edición de foto para que tus fotos tengan mayor impacto.

Mira te puedo recomendar también adobe PS5 (photoshop 5), la versión la compras en los buhoneros o la consigues por isohunt.com (el torrent). Incluso hay un tutorial increíblemente bueno de edición de fotos en Photoshop 5 (en inglés), ahí en isohunt que te lo recomiendo a ojos cerrados si vas a querer probar el PS5.

Ahora bien, yo uso muchísimo más el lightroom porque es super poderoso, es lo que usan más los profesionales. Es de la misma empresa de photoshop pero por algún motivo es mejor y más serio que PS en varias funciones. Lo que tiene photoshop es que puede trabajar con capas, pero si no las necesitas, ve con LR.

Para ver un ejemplo de reducción de ruido, visita el archivo Roraima3_(79).JPG:

y mira las actualizaciones que le hice. El archivo inicial estaba sobresaturado y super ruidoso sobretodo en el cielo. El ultimo archivo tiene ya su reducción de ruido y el cielo se ve azulito parejo. A ese le quité el ruido del cielo con Lightroom, que para eliminar ruido de verdad es una maravilla (yo normalmente uso valores máximos de 25-30 sobre una escala de reducción de 100, pero sólo cuando hay que jode ruido por ejemplo a ISO 2000... cuando es posible siempre evito reducir ruido porque disminuye la nitidez general).

Por último te puedo decir que no le tengas miedo al lightroom. El photoshop es más complicado y la interfaz de LR es de verdad super sencilla una vez que le agarras la mano. No tires la toalla. Si puedes bájate algun tutorial en español de la internet (aunque yo no use ninguno, aprendí jurungando por mi cuenta), y si todavía no puedes, hay cursos muy buenos en la castellana si vives en caracas, donde se dedican a varias clases, una de ellas edición digital con lightroom.

Suerte hermano estamos en contacto!--Paolo Costa (talk) 14:23, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

• Por cierto Wilfredo, mándame una de tus fotos en la mayor resolución que toma la cámara, pero en formato RAW y sin editar en nada. Quiero ver ese ruido que tal. Y lo reduzco y te mando una muestra de lo mejor que se puede hacer con LR. Yo siempre saco las fotos en RAW, pase lo que pase, porque tiene un rango de información muy elevado y las ediciones nunca soin destructivas como pasa con JPEG. Adicionalmente tienes más poder de balance de blancos si tomaste la foto en RAw en vez de JPEG y muchas otras ventajas. Hay quien prefiere JPEG por cuestiones de espacio y ladilla de editar las fotos luego, pero yo siempre uso y recomiendo el RAW 100%.

Re: Algunas mejoras

Si chamo yo no saco nunca mi camara por Caracas a pie, la saco es cuando voy a la gran sabana y lugares remotos o cuando voy en carro y la saco por segundos. En la ciudad es un peligro latente no se puede sacar la cámara por ahí. Es una lástima pero es nuestra realidad. --Paolo Costa (talk) 13:02, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Graphics lab

Kindly respond to the questions asked following your request at the Graphics Lab --Vera (talk) 09:51, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Jesus heart.JPG

File:Jesus heart.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 12:37, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Retrato_de_un_guardia_civil_en_Reinosa_entre_1855_y_1857_-_William_Atkinson.jpg

Hola The Photographer, la semana pasada charlamos en el IRC de WP-es, con Cheveri, sobre licencia de fotos antiguas, de más de 150 años. Las estoy subiendo (tal como me pediste) poco a poco, pero resulta farragoso introducir todos los datos y categorizarlas adecuadamente. Me encuentro con un problema que no sé si tú me puedes resolver: La foto que me interesaba subir para usarla en un artículo, resultaba muy general y para que quedara centrada en los detalles que me interesaban subí una nueva versión recortada pensando que ambas quedarían disponibles. El caso es que he querido revertir esa nueva versión para dejar la primera y subir esta nueva con otro nombre, pero no lo he logrado. Si me puedes echar una mano te lo agradezco. Un saludo. Jjmansan (talk) 23:33, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Muchísimas gracias The Photographer, es igualmente un placer para mi poder colaborar con vosotros. Respecto de las fotos, no se me ocurrió modificarlas en su color por respetar el aspecto original que tiene la fuente, pero tú mejor que yo, tendrás criterio sobre esto. Ya que estoy, abusaré un poco más de tu paciencia: Ayer intentaba organizar un poco la categoría Guardia Civil y al encontrarme alguna foto de vehículos, me puse a editarla para eliminar de ella la categoría genérica y ponerle la de Guardia Civil automoviles que ya tienes otras fotos de coches; pues bien, me encontré con la sorpresa de que al grabar los cambios daba esta como no existente, así que deshice los cambios. Era esta File:BMW Serie 5 Guardia Civil.JPG. ¿Por qué pasa esto? no lo entiendo y si miras los cambios que le hice, creo que no lo hice mal. Muchas gracias por todo y un saludo.Jjmansan (talk) 13:39, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

No consigo entrar ni al de WP-es ni al de commonsJjmansan (talk) 14:13, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Invitación

Hola Wilfredo, como estás? Por acá todo bien y muy contento con la victoria de nuestro Pastor Maldonado en la Fórmula Uno. Recibí tu invitación para ir al Pico Bolívar: te cuento que las ganas me sobran, pero nunca he escalado a un pico más allá del Roraima o del Ávila. Por lo tanto no tengo ni experiencia ni equipo necesario para hacer escaladas serias, y me imagino que eso podría ser un problema. En cuanto al conocimiento, revisando unas fotos tuyas me enteré que ya has subido al Pico, por lo cual en ese sentido tu me podrías dar todas las indicaciones necesarias para realizar un eventual viaje. Yo estoy en perfecto estado de salud, hago ejercicios todos los días y no tengo problemas por el mal de altura (recientemente estuve a 4.500 mts de altura viajando en carro en los Andes en Semana Santa). Creo que podría escalar sin problemas, pero te repito, como no tengo conocimiento ni experiencia no sé cuales requisitos se necesitarían para ascender al pico. Imagino que hará falta equipo especial para protegerse del frío y del viento en la noche, chaquetas especiales para subir, crampones para la nieve y alguna que otra cosa. No se si será posible alquilar dicho equipo o como habrás hecho tu en ocasiones anteriores. En todo caso si me pudieras ilustrar un poquito el proceso te lo agradezco. Otra limitante sería mi trabajo. Creo que si me tomo una semana de Agosto no habrá problema, pero si el viaje se toma más de una semana lo veo problemático. Tal vez lo más conveniente sería que lo hablemos por teléfono, si quieres te envío mi número por e-mail (por cuestiones de seguridad prefiero no enviarlo por acá). La idea me parece excelente, estaremos en contacto, gracias por la invitación. Espero tu respuesta, saludos. --Paolo Costa (talk) 19:03, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Gnu teacher.svg

Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 06:14, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leucippus fallax.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:18, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Camera cost

Hello,

I sympathize with your problem. I also live in a country where the revenue is low, and I have the same problem as yours. There are several solutions. One is to buy a second hand camera. With the fast change of technology, you can probably find a DSLR a few years old, with very good optic quality, just a bit less fashion and gadget. Then there are other ways to contribute to Commons, and that's what I did for a long time before being able to buy a camera. Best regards, Yann (talk) 07:18, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

• Me too. And all of my works are with a compact camera till now. But for birds, a second hand SLR will be better. Jkadavoor (talk) 06:38, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Anoplogaster cornuta skeletal

Hola The Photographer, hoy temprano estuve con tu imagen, dime que tal va quedando. Lo siguiente sería hacer el pez, que será simple o complicado de hacer dependiendo de qué pueda recuperar del código original. El único detalle es que escogiste la fuente Verdana que Mediawik no soporta; yo la cambiaría a Sans, que es muy similar.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/1.1/DTD/svg11.dtd">
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.1" width="2100" height="1350">
  <text style="font-size:45;font-family:Verdana">
    <tspan x="80" y="165" style="font-size:60">Anoplogaster cornuta</tspan>
    <tspan x="263" y="315">1</tspan>
    <tspan x="876" y="149">2</tspan>
    <tspan x="1262" y="173">3</tspan>
    <tspan x="1550" y="145">4</tspan>
    <tspan x="1839" y="296">5</tspan>
    <tspan x="1967" y="470">6</tspan>
    <tspan x="1945" y="688">7</tspan>
    <tspan x="1875" y="980">8</tspan>
    <tspan x="1642" y="1146">9</tspan>
    <tspan x="1260" y="1211">10</tspan>
    <tspan x="966" y="1270">11</tspan>
    <tspan x="926" y="1061">12</tspan>
    <tspan x="424" y="1034">13</tspan>
    <tspan x="202" y="951">14</tspan>
  </text>
  <path d="m 240,300 a 1,1 0 1 1 75,0 1,1 0 1 1 -75,0 z M 854,134 a 1,1 0 1 1 75,0 1,1 0 1 1 -75,0 z m 385,24 a 1,1 0 1 1 75,0 1,1 0 1 1 -75,0 z m 288,-28 a 1,1 0 1 1 75,0 1,1 0 1 1 -75,0 z m 289,151 a 1,1 0 1 1 75,0 1,1 0 1 1 -75,0 z m 128,174 a 1,1 0 1 1 75,0 1,1 0 1 1 -75,0 z m -22,218 a 1,1 0 1 1 75,0 1,1 0 1 1 -75,0 z m -70,292 a 1,1 0 1 1 75,0 1,1 0 1 1 -75,0 z m -233,166 a 1,1 0 1 1 75,0 1,1 0 1 1 -75,0 z m -367,65 a 1,1 0 1 1 75,0 1,1 0 1 1 -75,0 z m -294,59 a 1,1 0 1 1 75,0 1,1 0 1 1 -75,0 z m -40,-209 a 1,1 0 1 1 75,0 1,1 0 1 1 -75,0 z m -502,-27 a 1,1 0 1 1 75,0 1,1 0 1 1 -75,0 z M 194,936 a 1,1 0 1 1 75,0 1,1 0 1 1 -75,0 z" style="fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:3px" />
  <path d="m 251,335 -91,121 10,-29 c 2,8 7,13 15,13 l -25,16 10,-29 -10,29 z m 619,-165 -85,168 5,-30 c 3,7 9,12 17,10 l -22,20 5,-30 -5,30 z m 401,31 -32,198 -5,-30 c 5,6 13,8 19,4 l -14,26 -5,-30 5,30 z m 279,-31 -62,210 -1,-30 c 5,6 12,9 18,6 l -17,24 -1,-30 1,30 z m 265,128 -157,95 19,-24 c -1,8 2,15 10,17 l -29,7 19,-24 -19,24 z m 131,179 -143,100 18,-25 c 0,8 3,15 11,16 l -29,9 18,-25 -18,25 z m -28,194 -91,-36 28,2 c -6,4 -8,10 -5,17 l -23,-19 28,2 -28,-2 z m 0,0 -88,89 13,-25 c 1,7 6,12 14,11 l -27,14 13,-25 -13,25 z m -58,261 -195,-219 24,15 c -7,1 -12,5 -12,13 l -12,-28 24,15 -24,-15 z m -215,159 -56,-243 14,25 c -6,-3 -13,-1 -17,6 l 3,-31 14,25 -14,-25 z m -355,62 7,-127 8,29 c -6,-5 -14,-6 -20,-1 l 12,-28 8,29 -8,-29 z m -286,61 20,-89 2,28 c -5,-5 -12,-7 -18,-2 l 16,-26 2,28 -2,-28 z m -22,-202 198,-195 -14,25 c -1,-7 -6,-12 -14,-11 l 28,-14 -14,25 14,-25 z m -521,-37 146,-226 -7,28 c -3,-6 -9,-10 -16,-8 l 23,-20 -7,28 7,-28 z m 0,0 -58,-241 14,25 c -6,-3 -13,-1 -17,6 l 3,-31 14,25 -14,-25 z m -220,-82 80,-257 0,29 c -4,-5 -11,-7 -18,-3 l 18,-26 0,29 0,-29 z" style="fill:#ffffff;stroke:#ffffff;stroke-width:10px" />
  <path d="m 251,335 -91,121 10,-29 c 2,8 7,13 15,13 l -25,16 10,-29 -10,29 z m 619,-165 -85,168 5,-30 c 3,7 9,12 17,10 l -22,20 5,-30 -5,30 z m 401,31 -32,198 -5,-30 c 5,6 13,8 19,4 l -14,26 -5,-30 5,30 z m 279,-31 -62,210 -1,-30 c 5,6 12,9 18,6 l -17,24 -1,-30 1,30 z m 265,128 -157,95 19,-24 c -1,8 2,15 10,17 l -29,7 19,-24 -19,24 z m 131,179 -143,100 18,-25 c 0,8 3,15 11,16 l -29,9 18,-25 -18,25 z m -28,194 -91,-36 28,2 c -6,4 -8,10 -5,17 l -23,-19 28,2 -28,-2 z m 0,0 -88,89 13,-25 c 1,7 6,12 14,11 l -27,14 13,-25 -13,25 z m -58,261 -195,-219 24,15 c -7,1 -12,5 -12,13 l -12,-28 24,15 -24,-15 z m -215,159 -56,-243 14,25 c -6,-3 -13,-1 -17,6 l 3,-31 14,25 -14,-25 z m -355,62 7,-127 8,29 c -6,-5 -14,-6 -20,-1 l 12,-28 8,29 -8,-29 z m -286,61 20,-89 2,28 c -5,-5 -12,-7 -18,-2 l 16,-26 2,28 -2,-28 z m -22,-202 198,-195 -14,25 c -1,-7 -6,-12 -14,-11 l 28,-14 -14,25 14,-25 z m -521,-37 146,-226 -7,28 c -3,-6 -9,-10 -16,-8 l 23,-20 -7,28 7,-28 z m 0,0 -58,-241 14,25 c -6,-3 -13,-1 -17,6 l 3,-31 14,25 -14,-25 z m -220,-82 80,-257 0,29 c -4,-5 -11,-7 -18,-3 l 18,-26 0,29 0,-29 z" style="fill:#000000;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:5px" />
</svg>

Excelente trabajo el tuyo, esta es una verdadera obra de arte. Saludos, --Metrónomo (talk) 02:19, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Estuve muy ocupado afuera, pero te tenía noticias. Me hice un tiempito y prácticamente está terminado. Lo hice sobre tu versión original y ocupa cerca de 20kb. Sé que se podría mejorar, pero me parece así es una buena posición inicial. A partir de ahora cualquiera que le meta mano tendrá las cosas más fáciles. El resultado es un gráfico idéntico al original, o al menos tan parecido como pude hacerlo. Faltan detalles mínimos, en cuanto lo termine lo subo. Por cierto, eliminé entre 10 y 15 puntos como ese que se ve con claridad, la gran mayoría ubicados en la aleta pectoral. Supongo que son restos de tu edición, trazos que quisiste eliminar y no pudiste hacerlo del todo. Saludos, --Metrónomo (talk) 05:47, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Ah bueno, hiciste cambios considerables. Partamos de la base que modificaste las dimensiones. Con una transformación que abarque todo el dibujo lo podría reescalar, pero me gustaba más en grande. Tardaré un poco más de lo prometido pero lo sacaré bueno. Saludos, --Metrónomo (talk) 06:08, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Gracias

Gracias Wilfredo por tu bienvenida. Sí, vivo en Maracaibo, ya me uní al grupo que me invitaste, me encanto, hay estaremos en contacto. --George Miquilena (talk) 13:36, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Wikimedia Venezuela Presentation FLISOL Maracaibo 2012, Offline Kiwix 21.JPG

File:Wikimedia Venezuela Presentation FLISOL Maracaibo 2012, Offline Kiwix 21.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

99of9 (talk) 02:25, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Face of woman icon.png

File:Face of woman icon.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 17:10, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Leucippus fallax.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leucippus fallax.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laguna El Suero, Sierra Nevada, Merida, Venezuela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:02, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

RE:Saludos

Hola Wilfredo, como estàs hermano? Estoy recién llegando de mi viaje y pude ver con gusto que tu foto del Leucippus logró ser destacada. Por otro lado, espectacular la foto de la laguna El Suero en Mérida, espero volver pronto por esos lares. En cuanto al ruido, no he probado nada ulterior al Lightroom, ya que con eso elimino el ruido en modo mas que satisfactorio para la sensitividad del sensor de mi camara, y no he necesitado mejorar la reducción de ruido en ese aspecto. Por último quería agradecerte la nominación de mi archivo de la foto panorámica en Mérida, veo que tuvo varios positivos en Wikipedia en español. Ahora voy a ponerme al día con lo que ha estado pasando por aquí por la Wikipedia en español y revisar todo lo que se ha hecho en candidatos a recursos destacados y ponerme a ayudar un poco. Saludos desde el caos de la capital! Un abrazo, --Paolo Costa (talk) 18:56, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maiquetía Nacional Airport.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Sugerencias

Hola Wilfredo como te va? oye no sabria de verdad que recomendarte, la verdad estoy totalmente desactualizado en camaras digitales de vanguardia. Laa mia reflex a compre hace ya unos tres años y desde entonces no he revisado las nuevas tecnologias. Por supuesto te recomiendo comparar entre las camaras que tengas al alcance segun tu presupuesto y cumpla con tus gustos, yo no te puedo recomendar a ti una camara ya que tiene que adecuarse a tus necesidades. Revisa siempre la calidad del sensor y los lentes. Lo de los megapixeles no siempre es lo mas importante. A veces una nikon de 10 mp puede tener un sensor de mucho mejor calidad que una Casio de 16 MP, por decir algo. Ya el resto queda de tu parte. Revise el archivo modificado de bello monte, me parece que tiene un tinte un poco muy magentoso comparado como se vio en la vida real, pero tambien es una opcion valida. Saludos, --Paolo Costa (talk) 13:03, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Oppurtunity to get a donated camera

Hi The Photographer,

Have you seen this?

Best wishes from Denmark, --Slaunger (talk) 05:37, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Did you see you got it?!?!?! With bonus lenses!!! --Slaunger (talk) 15:13, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Congratulations! Yann (talk) 09:17, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pescador Margariteño de Pata e cabra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slight CA, but perfect shot – definitely QI for me. --Kreuzschnabel 18:11, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pescador Margariteño de Pata e cabra.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pescador Margariteño de Pata e cabra.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dog hybrid from Venezuela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:44, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poblacion de Los Nevados.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:52, 13 August 2012 (UTC) But, please, correct the tilt and brigthen it a bit up Poco a poco 20:42, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sierra Nevada de Merida, Loma Redonda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 09:50, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Charolais cattle, Sierra Nevada, Venezuela.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Charolais cattle, Sierra Nevada, Venezuela.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Contaminación en Maracaibo, Venezuela.jpg

Hola The Photographer. ¿De verdad es necesaria esa foto?, bueh. Ah, y ¡felicidades por tus nuevas fotos destacadas!-- George Miquilena · talk 01:50, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Esas del Lago si son útiles, pero si quieres crear consciencia con esas fotos podrías hacerlo en un lugar más flexible, como Facebook u otro sitio, aquí no muchos ven la foto o le prestan atención, puesto que no son la mayoría los que viven aquí en Maracaibo. Pero lo que más me llamo la atención es la gran resolución de la foto, 7 mb y pico pesa la foto Wow. Bueno espero la sigas pasando bien The Photographer. -- George Miquilena · talk 14:40, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Subdesarrollo

Hola The Photographer, ¿qué te parecen estos ejemplos de subdesarrollo? (ignora la calidad de las fotos) File:Buses de un país subdesarrollado (Venezuela).JPG y File:Parada para ir a San Carlos, Estado Zulia, Venezuela.JPG xD -- George Miquilena · talk 15:49, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

More assertive

Hello: Let me ask you, which are the issue in my comment that must improve the assertivity in Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Porto Covo July 2012-2.jpg? I think is it a clear and argued comment. Please tell me how you believe I must improve the assertivity in my comment. Thanks. --Bestiasonica (talk) 15:52, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Policlínica Maracaibo

¿Sabes si se puede acceder públicamente al estacionamiento de la Policlínica de Maracaibo? sería espectacular ir a tomar unas fotos ahí, mira la vista que tiene: File:Maracaibo panorama (1).jpg -- George Miquilena · talk 17:31, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Mandocas

Unas mandocas for you :)

-- George Miquilena · talk 00:23, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stenocereus griseus from Margarita island.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Prenn 06:13, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Islet, Margarita island, Venezuela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:23, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Sierra Nevada de Merida, Loma Redonda.jpg

Hola, me pides que te intente aclarar un poco más mi comentario en FPC. A ver si en español me resulta más sencillo. La pose del burro (o mula mejor dicho) derecho no me parece muy natural, porque viéndolo tal y como está tengo la impresión de que debería caerse hacia adelante. Creo que se debe a una distorsión de perspectiva vertical y que corrigiéndola estaría más horizontal con su centro de gravedad entre las patas. Enhorabuena por tus últimas imágenes y hasta pronto, Poco a poco (talk) 14:32, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boy Face from Venezuela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine for QI, but what about personality rights? - A.Savin 08:27, 30 August 2012 (UTC)  Info He's my nephew, his parents agreed to publish this photo here and with this license --The Photographer 12:31, 30 August 2012 (UTC) Thanks for clarifying, that's OK to me. - A.Savin 14:00, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Copyvio

Ya lo denuncie, que molleja, desde Septiembre del año pasado está ahí, también subió esta: File:Dulces zulianos.png. Te quedo muy buena esta foto: File:Hawker scrapings from Maracaibo, Venezuela.jpg -- George Miquilena · talk 20:08, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument to the Virgin of chiquinquira.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I think it will be a little better ... (file updated) --Aleks G 00:08, 2 September 2012 (UTC) Thanks for the perspective fix :) --The Photographer 00:23, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Boy Face from Venezuela.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Boy Face from Venezuela.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hawker scrapings from Maracaibo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:12, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Gracias

Hola The Photographer, veo que modificaste una foto mía y por eso la promovieron a imagen de calidad, no era necesaria la molestia, pero muchas gracias. -- George Miquilena · talk 14:36, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle Carabobo, Maracaibo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Tilted to the right, even the multi-storey in the background. This cannot be right. Can you fix it? Nice pic though. --Kreuzschnabel 07:34, 1 September 2012 (UTC)::Done?--The Photographer 13:06, 1 September 2012 (UTC) QU for me now --Kreuzschnabel 17:09, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Laguna El Suero.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Best (only) in scope, but needs geocoding, please. cmadler (talk) 13:15, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Ready geocoding --The Photographer (talk) 13:24, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

•  Support cmadler (talk) 13:11, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:53, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aerial photograph of a cargo ship.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:38, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Government Palace of Maracaibo, Venezuela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:38, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peñero en Bahia de Juan Griego, Venezuela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok for QI --Ralf Roletschek 02:14, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vegetacion de Sierra Nevada de Mérida, Venezuela.ogv, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'm not exactly sure how to judge a panorama video with voice-over, but I think it's good. --King of Hearts 05:32, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior de la Basilica de la Chinita.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 02:14, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peñero from Juan Griego, Margarita Island, Venezuela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:24, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Hola

Hola soy de Caracas aunque desde hace tres años resido en Darwin –NT- Australia y ahorita ando poniendo un poco de orden en las fotos que he subido y en mi página que estaba como depósito de despacho público, yo ya tengo como un año y unos cuatro meses en el sistema Wikimediayo soy aficionada a hacer clip en el obturador de las cámaras (vicio de familia) aunque no soy muy buena en el asunto en lo que soy mejor es fotografiando conchas de moluscos que lo aprendí de mi viejo. Bueno no sigo cotorreando Bye --Veronidae (talk) 23:43, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Es que algunas categorías si son principales o cabeza de grupo no deberían estar llenas de fotos de todo tipo ejemplo Category:Venezuela que tenia 113 imágenes de cuanta cosa existe, la gran mayoría las pase para la categoría lógica y algunas las coloque en las categorías generales de los estados mientra llego allí y me detengo con más calma a ubicarla, en la medida que voy cargado mis fotos con interés enciclopédico voy corrigiendo las categorías, tienes la facultad de eliminar categorías repetidas que queden vacías o a quien se le pude decir para que las elimine al parecer no todos los administradores son amigables y no responden por lo común.--Veronidae (talk) 12:54, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Si he usado el categorizador pero en Wikipedia y no me gusta mucho prefiero hacerlo manualmente, lo probare acá a ver que tal, en cuanto a George he visto que quiere ayudar pero creo que debe hacerlo con calma y paciencia me parece que anda con mucha prisa y de la prisa solo queda el cansancio; de la parte alta de los andes tengo algunas foto que tome ante de venirme a Australia pero no las tengo a mano le escribiré a mi hermana para que me las mande olas suba, de Bolívar debo subir algunas en los próximos días todo depende del tiempo que tenga hoy subiré de Lara. En cuanto al trabajo en equipo si es mejor no se puede estar en todas partes ni sabérselas todas :) --Veronidae (talk) 13:46, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Hola de nuevo, no conozco a Guillermo me tropece con su galería ayer y me paerecio muy interesante, pero me paracio que si habian algunos problemas con licencias pero como no domino aun bien el asunto de las licencias no quise decir nada.--Veronidae (talk) 02:54, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Penero in Margarita Island 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Jebulon 15:06, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Prueba.. Hola

Subi Fotos....Te envie un correo
Despues las categorizo...Tengo que salir

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Contaminacion del Lago de Maracaibo 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality image. This must also be shown. --Cayambe 09:02, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

HBO 2

Hola, The Photographer. Vi tu mensaje en que me decías que la imagen que subí de HBO 2 fue borrada. La imagen la tomé yo con mi cámara ¿Me puedes decir cuál fue el problema? Muchas gracias. --Penquista (talk) 22:33, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Brassolis sophorae MHNT Male ventre.jpg

Tu as effacé ma réponse sur cette page dans QI. Peux tu donner une explication? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Je te remercie de ta réponse qui me rassure pleinement. Dommage que tous les conflits ne se règlent pas aussi facilement et aussi courtoisement que celui-ci. Bien Amicalement --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:34, 17 September 2012 (UTC)--

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stained glass in the Basilica of Our Lady of Chiquinquira 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 07:26, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Government Palace of Maracaibo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:59, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Contaminacion del Lago de Maracaibo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 00:23, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boy from Margarita island, Venezuela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Really nice portrait shot, but there’s a strange (and distracting) kind of blur (which is not bokeh) in the background, especially visible at the bright roof left of center and the boats in the left bottom corner --Kreuzschnabel 15:41, 12 September 2012 (UTC) No, it's bokeh alright. Fair to poor bokeh. It would not keep me from supporting, however. --King of Hearts 16:32, 12 September 2012 (UTC) Changing to promotion as I don't think you (Kreuzschnabel) are declining, but if you object, move it to discuss. --King of Hearts 18:43, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle Carabobo de Maracaibo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 08:29, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stained glass in the Basilica of Our Lady of Chiquinquira 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! Please ad a geotag --Moroder 16:00, 16 September 2012 (UTC). Sure, thanks --The Photographer 17:10, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Re:Skyline/buildings/malls

 Done -- George Miquilena · talk 16:06, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Si, a mi me será un poco difícil porque me gusta el filtro que trae la cámara, pero bueno xD. -- George Miquilena · talk 17:35, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Jaja, sí, eso es lo que me gusta del filtro, pero bueno, es mejor las cosas como son en la realidad, supongo que ahora tomaré las fotos sin ese filtro. -- George Miquilena · talk 17:48, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa colonial de Maracaibo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Little CA but still QI for me. --Kreuzschnabel 18:55, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia San Francisco de Asís, Plaza Baralt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:02, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Nueva Version

Excelente....

Cerveza Zulia I. Lata alt.JPG

Hola The Photographer una de curiosidad me podrías explicar como es el cuento ese del trabajo derivado de la lata cerveza Zulia, he realizado algunos trabajo similares y siempre llega alguien y los etique para eliminar, es mas no entiendo como es que Rjcatillo la subió me supongo que la imagen de cerveza Zulia esta en derecho. Por cierto muy buen trabajo--Veronidae (talk) 23:35, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Gracias por el dato ahora se fregaron comezare fotografiar is latas soy colecionista de unas cuantas cosa entre ellas latas de de una diversidad de productos ¿esto incluye las latas de comida para peces?--Veronidae (talk) 00:25, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Jejejejeje el que se arrepiente de lo que dice, luego le pican las orejas :) --Veronidae (talk) 17:14, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Hay nuevas imagenes

 Subi nuevas imagenes cuando puedas le echas un vistazo

Fotos

  Listo ahora si....puedes visualizarlas...Me das tu opinion...

--Rjcastillo (talk) 20:32, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Plaza de Santa Lucia de Maracaibo.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 03:18, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Mejoras

    Buenas noches, 
       Se ve bien....De todos modos yo las nomine para imagenes de calidad sin modificarlas...Estoy esperando para ver que opinan.

--Rjcastillo (talk) 04:12, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buque de Carga CFS PAFILIA, sobre el Lago de Maracaibo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, but strong vignetting. Could you reduce it ?--Jebulon 13:08, 8 September 2012 (UTC). Ready, Only the upper right is a little dark due to smoke --The Photographer 20:18, 9 September 2012 (UTC) Looks to be some CA at the stern. Mattbuck 09:21, 16 September 2012 (UTC) fixed, I think so --The Photographer 23:25, 18 September 2012 (UTC)Not perfect, but OK.--Jebulon 14:53, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Modulo de Atención Turístico.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Julian Herzog 15:52, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Cordillera del Páramo de la Culata.jpg

Sorry, it's not much better. Retouching problems are still all over the sky and on the right part of the mountains too. Regards, --Ivar (talk) 14:34, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't have any experience with removing chromatic aberration (images taken with better lenses almost don't have CA at all). But I'm sure, it can be done with different software. --Ivar (talk) 14:45, 25 September 2012 (UTC)