User talk:XRay/Archive/2015

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winterswijk (NL), Berenschot's Watermolen -- 2014 -- 3172.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 10:55, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Köln, Reiterstandbild -Wilhelm II.- -- 2014 -- 1917.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 12:19, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karlsruhe, Victoriapensionat -- 2013 -- 5246.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 12:42, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, ehem. Bahnhof -- 2014 -- 3530.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:16, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Liebesschlösser (am Seezeichen) -- 2014 -- 3555.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 08:56, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Diego (California, USA), Old Town -- 2012 -- 5550.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 05:59, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vatican City (VA), Petersplatz -- 2013 -- 3855.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Fixed Thanks. It's fixed.--XRay 12:57, 2 January 2015 (UTC) Good quality. Ok for me now. --Hubertl 15:55, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Köln, Reiterstandbild -Wilhelm II.- -- 2014 -- 1802.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 05:59, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karlsruhe, Tribünengebäude -- 2013 -- 5285.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Two issues to resolve, see my notes --Cccefalon 08:08, 31 December 2014 (UTC)  Fixed Thanks. It's fixed now.--XRay 06:40, 2 January 2015 (UTC) Thank you! --Cccefalon 08:06, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Diego (California, USA), Old Town -- 2012 -- 5528.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:50, 03 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Köln, Pegelturm -- 2014 -- 1814.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 06:44, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Köln, Hohe Domkirche St. Petrus -- 2014 -- 1796.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 06:05, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vatican City (VA), Petersdom -- 2013 -- 3656.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support For me good. --Hockei 16:24, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Diego (California, USA), Point Loma, Historic Lighthouse -- 2012 -- 5589.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:28, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Photographer's Barnstar

Hallo Dietmar, jetzt auch noch mal von mir eine Anerkennung Deiner brillanten Bilder! Erst gestern habe ich die vielen tollen Aufnahmen vom Juni-Fotoflug nicht zuletzt über das Tecklenburger Land entdeckt. Und bin seither einmal mehr total begeistert. Übrigens nicht nur über die technische Qualität der Aufnahmen (war da eigentlich eine Scheibe zwischen Dir als Fotograf und dem Himmel...?), sondern auch über Deine vorzüglichen Ortskenntnisse. War da viel Recherche vonnöten? Hier und da nehme ich nun noch einige Feinjustierungen vor, aber das sind vergleichsweise Lappalien. Ganz herzlichen Dank für den Einsatz (schade nur, dass ich von diesem Fotoflug bislang gar nichts erfahren hatte...)! Weiter so und viel Erfolg auch in diesem Jahr, wünscht Dir J.-H. Janßen (talk) 20:04, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Danke! Und an dieser Stelle Dank an Dich für das Nachkategorisieren! Bei den Bildern im Tecklenburger Land war keine Scheibe dazwischen, aber oft eine Distanz von zwei bis drei Kilometern. Da ist dann reichlich Dunst dazwischen. Die Ortskenntnisse sind angeeignet, mit Google Maps, Openstreetmap und Google Earth (wg. der anderen Zusatzinformationen). Das ist manchmal schon viel Sucherei, aber manchmal habe ich leider aufgeben müssen, da gab es nicht genug Informationen. Die Sucherei ist ein Grund dafür, dass ich erst beim vierten der fünf Flüge bin. Es folgen also noch Ost-Münsterland und ein zweiter Flug im Süden.--XRay ^talk 05:57, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Köln, Ruine -Alt St. Alban- -- 2014 -- 1902.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:12, 04 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lynmouth (Devon, UK) -- 2013 -- 1482.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Stunning hues, perfect sharpness, superb quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:16, 04 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Köln, Klosterkirche -Alt St. Heribert- -- 2014 -- 1862.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:19, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New York City (New York, USA), Statue of Liberty -- 2012 -- 6819.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments a bit noisy --Christian Ferrer 05:59, 3 January 2015 (UTC)  Fixed I've reduced noise. Hopefully it is good enough... --XRay 12:09, 3 January 2015 (UTC)still some color noise --Christian Ferrer 19:00, 3 January 2015 (UTC)  Fixed Thanks. Now there is better color noise reduction.--XRay 06:04, 4 January 2015 (UTC) Support The sky is just but subject is ok IMO --Christian Ferrer 15:15, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Rügen, Beach at Sellin -- 2009 -- 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rügen, Beach at Sellin -- 2009 -- 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:07, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Category:Lens focal length

Category:Lens focal length has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--El Grafo (talk) 10:24, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karlsruhe, Skulptur -Pallas Athene- -- 2013 -- 5276.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:36, 07 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Köln, Hohenzollernbrücke -- 2014 -- 1873.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:35, 07 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vatican City (VA), Petersplatz -- 2013 -- 3895.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:37, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Liebesschlösser (am Seezeichen) -- 2014 -- 3558.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:29, 08 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rome (IT), Ponte Sisto -- 2013 -- 4094.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:51, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Köln, Hohe Domkirche St. Petrus -- 2014 -- 1799.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Fixed Sorry, you're right. It's fixed now.--XRay 12:28, 5 January 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:42, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Viktorkirmes auf dem Marktplatz -- 2014 -- 3704.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:58, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vatican City (VA), Petersdom -- 2013 -- 3902.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Crisp detail, if a little dim --Daniel Case 23:50, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Recklinghausen, St.-Peter-Kirche -- 2013 -- 4918.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Quarzwerke -- 2014 -- 4021 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:37, 09 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Los Angeles (California, USA), Union Station -- 2012 -- 4938.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 09:22, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Memmertfeuer -- 2014 -- 3528.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 17:16, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Viktorkirmes auf dem Overbergplatz -- 2014 -- 3742.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Artistic photograph, special quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:21, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Bildstock -Heilige Barbara- -- 2014 -- 3040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:25, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

This painting is good?

This painting is bad or you forgot to support? ;) 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:51, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Köln, Malakoffturm -- 2014 -- 1826.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me. --Johann Jaritz 04:58, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche -- 2014 -- 2748.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Well composed, good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:53, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, LVM-Versicherung -- 2014 -- 3276.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Super perspective, excellent architecture image. --Johann Jaritz 07:50, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Strandzugang -- 2014 -- 3480.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 08:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Viktorkirmes auf dem Overbergplatz -- 2014 -- 3754.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Marvellous hues, stunning image. --Johann Jaritz 07:47, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Große Teichsmühle -- 2015 -- 00995.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good and nice IMO --Christian Ferrer 08:42, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vatican City (VA), Petersdom -- 2013 -- 4198.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Quarzwerke -- 2014 -- 4015 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 08:21, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Sanddorn -- 2014 -- 3494.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:45, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kriegerehrenmal -- 2014 -- 3306.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 05:05, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Lüdinghauser Tor -- 2015 -- 4813-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:47, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Viktorkirmes auf dem Overbergplatz -- 2014 -- 3765.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 13:03, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Lüdinghauser Tor -- 2014 -- 3334.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:56, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Ehrenfriedhof -- 2014 -- 3270.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:45, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Mühlenwegfriedhof -- 2014 -- 3362.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:06, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New York City (New York, USA), Statue of Liberty -- 2012 -- 6818.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think it is a bit tilted (see note), and the shadowed area at bottom is a bit noisy --Christian Ferrer 19:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)  Fixed Yes, you're right. It was tilted. Now it's fixed.--XRay 17:12, 13 January 2015 (UTC) Support --Christian Ferrer 16:39, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Rome (IT), Denkmal eines Bersagliere (Porte Pia) -- 2013 -- 3328.jpg

File:Rome (IT), Denkmal eines Bersagliere (Porte Pia) -- 2013 -- 3328.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hubertl (talk) 22:02, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Mühlenwegfriedhof -- 2014 -- 3361.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:38, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, LVM, Skulptur -Zwei Pferde- -- 2014 -- 3277.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Funny. Please wikilink your upload blurb. –Be..anyone 07:22, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Köln, Hohe Domkirche St. Petrus, Türgriff -- 2010 -- 2983.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:25, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Recklinghausen, St.-Peter-Kirche -- 2013 -- 4926.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:27, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winterswijk (NL), Berenschot's Watermolen -- 2014 -- 3110.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Hopefully they'll fix the wheel. –Be..anyone 23:03, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vatican City (VA), Petersplatz -- 2013 -- 3850.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:42, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Mühlenwegfriedhof -- 2014 -- 3360.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:15, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, LVM, Skulptur -Zwei Pferde- -- 2014 -- 3279.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some metadata to explain the pair available on File:Blaues pferd.jpg. –Be..anyone 04:39, 16 January 2015 (UTC)  Comment Thanks. I've appended the meta information.--XRay 12:38, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Ehrenfriedhof -- 2014 -- 3273.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:00, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kriegerehrenmal -- 2014 -- 3304.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:20, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, LVM-Versicherung -- 2014 -- 3281.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:13, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Mühlenwegfriedhof -- 2014 -- 3359.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Famberhorst 08:10, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Ehrenfriedhof -- 2014 -- 3274.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 09:14, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Bildstock -- 2014 -- 3300.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 09:17, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kriegerehrenmal -- 2014 -- 3303.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--NoRud 11:35, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Seebrücke -- 2014 -- 3534.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 16:51, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Sanddorn -- 2014 -- 3491.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me. --C messier 16:58, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Bendix -- 2014 -- 3314.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:24, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Lüdinghauser Tor -- 2015 -- 4800.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting perspective, very dynamic and good. --Steindy 17:49, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche -- 2014 -- 3371.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:21, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Lüdinghauser Tor -- 2014 -- 3337.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 18:14, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kriegerehrenmal -- 2014 -- 3305.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 18:41, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Ehrenfriedhof -- 2014 -- 3267.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for me, althought DOF not optimal. --C messier 10:14, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Quarzwerke -- 2014 -- 4018 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Beautifull idea, but IMHO DOF is too low, and there is a cyan CA at the top. --C messier 16:04, 10 January 2015 (UTC)  Fixed Sorry. CAs removed.--XRay 09:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC) I think it's ok, if iffy. Mattbuck 21:25, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Bild: Birkungen, Talsperre -- um 1980

Siehe mal dortige Diskussion.--79.214er (talk) 10:41, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Häuser (Hohe Straße) -- 2014 -- 3324.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:58, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche -- 2014 -- 3317.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 08:03, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Lüdinghauser Tor -- 2014 -- 3330.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 08:03, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Mühlenwegfriedhof -- 2014 -- 3355.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:23, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Otto-Mann-Haus -- 2014 -- 3537.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 09:17, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Dorf -- 2014 -- 3478.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:09, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Lüdinghauser Tor -- 2014 -- 3333.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:44, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Westdeutsche Lotterie -- 2014 -- 3299.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, "Schutt happens" ;-). --Dnalor 01 18:29, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Ehrenfriedhof -- 2014 -- 3275.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'll be frank; the composition doesn't really work with me, personally. However, it certainly fits the QI criteria. --Crisco 1492 07:58, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Lüdinghauser Tor -- 2014 -- 3339.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 22:40, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Strandzugang -- 2014 -- 3482.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 22:40, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Bildstock -- 2014 -- 3301.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:00, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, 7. Längengrad (Strandpromenade) -- 2014 -- 3485.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 08:12, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, LVM-Versicherung -- 2014 -- 3288.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:50, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Mühlenwegfriedhof -- 2014 -- 3358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Fixed Sorry. It's fixed (and perspective fixes done).--XRay 16:34, 21 January 2015 (UTC) Okay now, good quality. --Steindy 00:09, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Lüdinghauser Tor -- 2014 -- 3338.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 13:39, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Ich kann nichts für die Konfusion...

Bei der Bewertung Deines Bildes vom Lüdenscheider Tor wurde von Dnalor 01 einfach nur angefragt - als üblicher Vorgang - eventuelle Perspektivkorrekturen zu klären, und diese als machbar klassifiziert. Dann kam be..anyone (der mir völlig unbekannt ist, aber sichtlich auf sehr selbstbewusst macht) mit einem Bewertungskommentar, den ich so nicht stehenlassen konnte. Ich bin - wie wahrscheinlich alle anderen auch - der Meinung, dass, wenn ein Kollege nicht bewertet, sondern eine Anregung zur Verbesserung macht, man sich in diesen Ablauf nicht einklinken sollte. Noch dazu kann wohl niemand mit einem Kommentar: spent days for this POV? etwas anfangen. Ich hoffe, im Sinne eines kollegialen Ablaufs auch in deinem Interesse gehandelt zu haben.--Hubertl (talk) 23:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Kein Problem, jeder ist halt anders. Diese Art der Kommentare bzw. der Kommentierung lese ich und nehme sie zur Kenntnis, mehr nicht. Ich für meinen Teil ergänze Kommentare nur, wenn ich grundsätzlich anderer Meinung bin. Ich verfahre also anders.
Mir fallen nur die englischen Erklärungen etwas schwerer, aber das Gebäude kippt tatsächlich leicht nach außen. Manchmal kann man das aus den Bildern gut korrigieren, manchmal aber wegen der Nachbargebäude eben nicht. Hier eben nicht. Eigentlich sollte klar sein, dass es bei alten Gebäude nicht immer die Senkrechten gibt.
Danke für deinen Hinweis und deine Unterstützung. --XRay ^talk 04:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Herzliches Dankeschön für Deine Fotos zum Jahreswechsel

Hallo XRay,

Danke für Deinen Beitrag zum Weihnachts-Fotowettbewerb zum Thema Weinachtszeit, Winterzeit, Wendezeit''!

Mit Deiner Hilfe wurden commons um über 1500 Bilder zu Winter- & Weihnachtsthemen bereichert - mit einer großen Motivvielfalt, die von Weihnachtsmärkten und -dekorationen über Weihnachtsmänner, verschneite Landschaften und Schlössern zu typischen Speisen und Getränken reicht.

Wie Du vielleicht unserem Bericht im Kurier schon entnommen hast, haben wir die Community nun zu Abstimmungen in der Endrunde aufgerufen. Zur Wahl stehen die 14 eingereichten Artikel und 100 Bilder, die bis zum 20. Januar durch die Vorrunde und die Einbindung in Artikel ausgewählt wurden. Für die Gewinner, die bis zum 31. Jänner/Januar mit Eurer Hilfe ermittelt werden, stehen durch Unterstützung seitens von WMDE und WMAT insgesamt 12 Bild- und 4 Artikelpreise zur Verfügung. Da in jeder Kategorie – Bild oder Artikel – nur maximal ein Preis pro Teilnehmer möglich ist, sind die Preischancen groß.

Wir freuen uns, wenn Du Zeit findest, dich an der Wahl zu beteiligen. Du hast beliebig viele gereihte Stimmen, wobei erste Stimmen mehr zählen als nachfolgende (zur Reihung setzt Du einfach eine Zahl vor deine Unterschrift).

Um eine genüssliche Betrachtung der Bilder zu ermöglichen, sind die Finalisten nicht nur auf der Abstimmungsseite, sondern auch in einer Galerie zu finden.

Liebe Grüße und viel Spaß beim Bilder und Artikel bewerten!

Anna reg, Dr. Bernd Gross (talk) 08:13, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Mühlenwegfriedhof -- 2014 -- 3352.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 01:33, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, LVM-Versicherung -- 2014 -- 3289.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:49, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Seebrücke -- 2014 -- 3516.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support nice --Christian Ferrer 06:28, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Köln, Ruine -Alt St. Alban- -- 2014 -- 1907.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:51, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Mühlenwegfriedhof -- 2014 -- 3346.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:27, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Lüdinghauser Tor -- 2014 -- 3327.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Little bit overexposed on the sky. I left a note. --Halavar 01:46, 24 January 2015 (UTC)  Fixed Sorry, you're right. I adjusted the lights and it's now better.--XRay 07:01, 24 January 2015 (UTC)  Support Good now. --Halavar 10:08, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche -- 2014 -- 3404.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 00:44, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Mühlenwegfriedhof -- 2014 -- 3341.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Okay now. Good quality. --Steindy 23:10, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Wegekreuz (am Kettbach) -- 2014 -- 3386.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:39, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kriegerehrenmal -- 2014 -- 3310.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 09:00, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Bildstock -- 2014 -- 3302.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:38, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Strandzugang -- 2014 -- 3479.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, yet it seems to be tilted cw (according to the horizon). --Cccefalon 08:24, 25 January 2015 (UTC)  Fixed Yes! Sorry. Thanks. Fixed.--XRay 09:53, 25 January 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:08, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche -- 2014 -- 3368.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:56, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, LVM-Versicherung -- 2014 -- 3294.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:36, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Otto-Mann-Haus -- 2014 -- 3536.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not perfect, but good enough for QI --Hubertl 23:46, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Ehrenfriedhof -- 2014 -- 3270.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments DoF is fine. Good quality. --Ram-Man 02:31, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Yachthafen -- 2014 -- 3542.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:45, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, 7. Längengrad (Strandpromenade) -- 2014 -- 3489.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me. --Halavar 13:37, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kriegerehrenmal -- 2014 -- 3309.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:13, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Hermann-Leeser-Schule -- 2014 -- 3374.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:17, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Bendix -- 2014 -- 3315.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 19:16, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Lüdinghauser Tor -- 2014 -- 2881.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchspiel, Rödder, Mäusescheune -- 2013 -- 2226.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Famberhorst 05:53, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Wegekreuz (am Kettbach) -- 2014 -- 3384.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:51, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Wegekreuz an der Halterner Straße -- 2014 -- 3034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:20, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, LVM-Versicherung -- 2014 -- 3290.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Kreuzschnabel 16:16, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Bildstock an der Halterner Straße -- 2014 -- 3421.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:00, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Jubiläumsbrunnen -- 2014 -- 0148.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 06:10, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Schloss -- 2014 -- 6677.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:05, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, LVM-Versicherung -- 2014 -- 3298.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:44, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Sanddorn -- 2014 -- 3483.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 07:49, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vatican City (VA), Petersdom -- 2013 -- 4352.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Yes, perspective correction. IMO OK.--XRay 16:39, 21 January 2015 (UTC) A tighter crop at the top might help. Mattbuck 22:16, 21 January 2015 (UTC)  Fixed Thanks. Top changed now.--XRay 12:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC) That;s a bit better, but could you sharpen the left hand side (roughly from the IN column left). Mattbuck 23:27, 23 January 2015 (UTC)  Fixed It's now sharpened. Thanks for your review.--XRay 09:44, 24 January 2015 (UTC) Bit better, just a bit more please (note added). Mattbuck 22:05, 28 January 2015 (UTC)  Fixed Thanks for your note. It's now sharper.--XRay 17:22, 29 January 2015 (UTC) Not perfect but better. Mattbuck 20:46, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Köln, Schokoladenmuseum -- 2014 -- 1821.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:59, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Lüdinghauser Tor -- 2014 -- 3329.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Villy Fink Isaksen 07:49, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Lüdinghauser Tor -- 2014 -- 2908.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful sunset picture. QI for me.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:20, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchplatz der St.-Viktor-Kirche -- 2014 -- 3392.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --ArildV 06:29, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Lüdinghauser Tor -- 2014 -- 3410.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 08:01, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche -- 2014 -- 3397.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:09, 01 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchplatz der St.-Viktor-Kirche -- 2014 -- 3393.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:07, 01 February 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dülmen, Viktorkirmes auf dem Overbergplatz -- 2014 -- 3738.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Viktorkirmes auf dem Overbergplatz -- 2014 -- 3738.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Lüdinghauser Tor -- 2014 -- 3412.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:46, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche -- 2014 -- 3399.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 05:03, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Bildstock an der Halterner Straße -- 2014 -- 3423.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:05, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchplatz der St.-Viktor-Kirche -- 2014 -- 3395.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shame about the plate St Victor upper right, but good quality.--Famberhorst 05:53, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Feuerwehr -- 2014 -- 3518.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 09:30, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Bildstock an der Halterner Straße -- 2014 -- 3422.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:03, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Memmertfeuer -- 2014 -- 3529.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:42, 04 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Liebesschlösser (am Seezeichen) -- 2014 -- 3557.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:50, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Lüdinghauser Tor -- 2014 -- 3415.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:23, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchplatz der St.-Viktor-Kirche -- 2014 -- 3396.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:08, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche -- 2014 -- 3367.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:03, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Köln, Hohe Domkirche St. Petrus -- 2014 -- 1864.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good quality except for the pin-cushion distortion visible in the red bars. Will support as soon as this has been fixed. --Kreuzschnabel 03:38, 3 February 2015 (UTC)  Fixed Sorry. Not good. I've fixed it and new the images is uploading ...--XRay 17:11, 3 February 2015 (UTC)  Support OK now. --Kreuzschnabel 22:28, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Lüdinghauser Tor -- 2014 -- 3416.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Hubertl 08:58, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche -- 2014 -- 3403.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:58, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Bildstock an der Halterner Straße -- 2014 -- 3427.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:10, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Lüdinghauser Tor -- 2014 -- 3417.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:58, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2013 -- 9934.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lovely. --Mattbuck 23:56, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Siebenteufelsturm -- 2014 -- 5939.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:36, 05 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Bildstock -Heilige Barbara- -- 2014 -- 3042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:22, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche -- 2014 -- 0061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:30, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Restaurant -Drübbelken- -- 2014 -- 6897.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:33, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Altes Rathaus -- 2013 -- 4976-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment There are some hotpixels (or strange red stars) and a big lens flare. Can be fixed, I think. --Code 07:03, 6 February 2015 (UTC)  Fixed Hot pixel ... It's fixed now. Thanks.--XRay 12:27, 6 February 2015 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --Code 13:01, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Köln, Historisches Rathaus -- 2014 -- 1910.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:55, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Rathaus -- 2014 -- 5514.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:04, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Nonnenturm -- 2014 -- 3390.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Lüdinghauser Tor -- 2014 -- 3420.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:38, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Nonnenturm -- 2014 -- 3391.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for a common natural phenomenon. --Hubertl 15:38, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Bildstock an der Halterner Straße -- 2014 -- 3424.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche -- 2014 -- 2751.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pity the shadows, but good quality.--Famberhorst 06:05, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche -- 2014 -- 0060.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I don't think that perspective has to be fixed in this image, QI as it is. --C messier 15:37, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2014 -- 3976.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:02, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Tor am Park Sentmaring -- 2014 -- 3222.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:20, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goslar, Kaiserpfalz -- 2008 -- 0354.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overall good quality. The photo is leaning clockwise. Also I proposed another crop which avoids the half cut roof window. --Cccefalon 10:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)  Fixed Thanks. It's fixed now. --XRay 10:41, 10 February 2015 (UTC) Well done, good quality. --Cccefalon 13:42, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris, Triumphbogen -- 2014 -- 1632.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent. --Mattbuck 23:30, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karlsruhe, Skulptur -Pallas Athene- -- 2013 -- 5275.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good qualité, although the sky is slightly overexposed --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:24, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kreuzigungsgruppe -- 2014 -- 3211.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:14, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vatican City (VA), Petersplatz -- 2013 -- 4193.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 20:55, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Rettungsschiff -- 2014 -- 3575.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:02, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Strandzugang -- 2014 -- 3603.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:12, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Strand -- 2014 -- 3601.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:12, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kreuzigungsgruppe -- 2014 -- 3212.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:29, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Quarzwerke, Bahnverladung -- 2014 -- 4086.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 11:00, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, 7. Längengrad (Seebrücke) -- 2014 -- 3566.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:04, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Yachthafen -- 2014 -- 3540.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:36, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Quarzwerke -- 2014 -- 4199.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 11:05, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, 7. Längengrad (Seebrücke) -- 2014 -- 3565.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:36, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Habe auf

meiner Beo gerade gesehen, dass Du Bilder von Juist (um-)kategorisierst und bin dabei auf Deine Juist-Bilder gestoßen. Traumhaft schön! Viele Grüße, --4028mdk09 (talk) 22:33, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Danke! Mir war es doch etwas zu ungeordnet und ich wusste meist nicht, wo ich mit meinen Bildern hin sollte. Ansonsten bin ich ja eher im Münsterland unterwegs. Ein wenig kommt aber noch.--XRay ^talk 06:04, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Stift Rein - Stiftungsurkunde, Faksimile.jpg

Stift Rein - Stiftungsurkunde, Faksimile

Hallo, ich habe mich sehr bemüht, die Übersetzung des Textes der Urkunde (siehe rechts) zu bekommen. Nun habe ich es wirklich geschafft: DER Fachmann für diese Angelegenheit, der derzeitige Reiner Stiftsarchivar Norbert Müller, hat mir diese (seine) Übersetzung über einen Kollegen zukommen lassen. Ich habe sie vollständigst (mit Anmerkungen) der deutschen Dateibeschreibung beigefügt. Ist zwar ziemlich lang, aber dafür sehr genau und komplett (mit Kommentar)! Beste Grüße --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 08:24, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Hut ab! Das finde ich richtig toll. So erhalten die Bilder bei Wikimedia Commons richtig Wert.--XRay ^talk 08:26, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Danke vielmals für Deine Antwort! Freut mich sehr, wenn Du meine Mühe schätzt! Ich habe natürlich auch im WP-Artikel über Stift Rein die Info dazu geschrieben (sowohl im Text als auch in der Bildunterschrift), dass die deutsche Übersetzung in der Dateibeschreibung des Faksimile-Bildes zu finden ist! Beste Grüße --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 09:00, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buldern, Stade Landmaschinen -- 2014 -- 9938 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:21, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Quarzwerke, Sandreinigung -- 2014 -- 4127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:33, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, 7. Längengrad (Seebrücke) -- 2014 -- 3568.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:20, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, 7. Längengrad (Seebrücke) -- 2014 -- 3571.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:33, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall in Juist, Lower Saxony, Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose - The guidance note Valued image scope states that "Buildings, like other places, should be of more than local interest to justify a scope." What is special about this building? It is not a national monument. I don't see any architectural significance. Why is it more significant than thousands of other town halls around Germany? I therefore feel that this nomination does not meet the "scope" criteria. -- Martinvl (talk) 07:49, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Town halls are the most important buildings. They symbolize the union of citizens around common values. Every few citizens regardless of their religion or culture must recognize in this building. While it is neither historical nor beautiful. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:29, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

• I do not dispute that the town hall is an important building in the local community. However, the rules for a valid scope state quite clearly that the building should be of more than local interest to justify inclusion. -- Martinvl (talk) 10:22, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

• We have a judgment too influenced by the our aesthetic and architectural values. I myself have long thought like you, but we must be more open to what others are doing. It's not easy to find the balance between what can be of value and runaway system. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:13, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

• May I put things into perspective - Germany has 1500 "gemeinde" with a population of 10,000 or more (See here). Even if we catalogue the Rathaus of every one of these gemeinde, we will not include Juist - its population is about 1500. Add to this the Hôtels de ville in each of France's 10,000 communes, we can see how the scope escalates. I have not yet included the equivalent buildings in other countries. That is why I asked what was special about this Rathaus. -- Martinvl (talk) 18:39, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

•  Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:53, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:51, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Hafen -- 2014 -- 3561.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:53, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Hafen -- 2014 -- 3560.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 10:55, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Quarzwerke, Sandtrocknung -- 2014 -- 4108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:31, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Quarzwerke, Sandreinigung -- 2014 -- 4194.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:58, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Quarzwerke, Sandreinigung -- 2014 -- 4422.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I’d have preferred a bit more DoF to get all the foreground flanges sharp but nevertheless QI --Kreuzschnabel 06:24, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Kran am Hafen -- 2014 -- 3572.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:43, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Otto-Mann-Haus -- 2014 -- 3574.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:14, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buldern, Schloss Buldern -- 2014 -- 9232 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 21:28, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rorup, St.-Agatha-Kirche -- 2014 -- 9181 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 11:42, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Quarzwerke, Silbersee -- 2014 -- 4152.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:33, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Strand -- 2014 -- 3597.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:54, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Watt -- 2014 -- 3563.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:52, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Stadthausturm -- 2014 -- 0278.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 22:18, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coesfeld, DMK Deutsches Milchkontor -- 2014 -- 7644 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 00:12, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Bank auf dem Deich -- 2014 -- 3581.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting composition and QI -- Spurzem 09:45, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Quarzwerke, Silbersee -- 2014 -- 4150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Famberhorst 06:04, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Quarzwerke, Sandtrocknung -- 2014 -- 4115-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Difficult motive, but well done. Seem pretty artistic. --Hubertl 11:18, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beckum, Hotel Höxberg -- 2014 -- 8718 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:16, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Quarzwerke, Werkzeughalle -- 2014 -- 4057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 21:00, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Quarzwerke, Werkzeug in der Werkzeughalle -- 2014 -- 4059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 21:00, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Quarzwerke, Silbersee -- 2014 -- 4417.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 08:00, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Quarzwerke -- 2014 -- 4014 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ermmmmmmmmm - the description is absolutely wrong: The three units represent AFRISO leakage indicators for the safety hull of three tanks with water hazarding fluids. --Cccefalon 13:53, 17 February 2015 (UTC) FWIW, sort out this description and I think it's QI. Mattbuck 22:33, 17 February 2015 (UTC)  Fixed I've updated the description. Thanks for your help.--XRay 10:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC) Though the colour of the shadows do challenge me, I would agree with Matt that it is QI. --Cccefalon 13:20, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Skulptur -Strandläufer- -- 2014 -- 3587.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:32, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Düne -- 2014 -- 3606.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:30, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Quarzwerke, Werkzeughalle -- 2014 -- 4065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:04, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Quarzwerke, Silbersee -- 2014 -- 4153.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Fixed Yes, you're right. The image is now brighter and I optimized WB.--XRay 07:02, 20 February 2015 (UTC)Good quality. --Moroder 14:44, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Quarzwerke, Saugbagger auf dem Silbersee -- 2014 -- 4412.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:25, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kreuzkapelle -- 2014 -- 2707.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Skulptur -Strandläufer- -- 2014 -- 3589.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:05, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Strand -- 2014 -- 3595.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:05, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Quarzwerke, LKW-Verladung -- 2014 -- 4093.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:46, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ennigerloh, Zementwerk Elsa -- 2014 -- 8677 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:00, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausdülmen, Große Teichsmühle, Statue -Heiliger Nepomuk- -- 2014 -- 3055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glandorf, St.-Johannis-Kirche -- 2014 -- 8544 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:11, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Quarzwerke, Bahnverladung -- 2014 -- 4088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:10, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Inselschule -- 2014 -- 3612.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 07:10, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Skulptur -Strandläufer- -- 2014 -- 3591.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:00, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ahlen, Tönnishäuschen, Mühle -- 2014 -- 8663 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me. --C messier 21:53, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Quarzwerke, Werkzeughalle -- 2014 -- 4050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support--Famberhorst 05:55, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Memmertfeuer -- 2014 -- 3578.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 05:31, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Baumschule Reckmann -- 2014 -- 8081 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Kraft 10:56, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Skulptur -Strandläufer- -- 2014 -- 3592.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:57, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Strand -- 2014 -- 3596.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 15:04, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Liebesschlösser -- 2014 -- 3594.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support All in all good quality, I’d have chosen a deeper DoF though to get the inscription on the main subject entirely sharp. Would be a reason to oppose on FPC but isn’t here --Kreuzschnabel 06:56, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Quarzwerke, Sandreinigung -- 2014 -- 4145-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:41, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Strandbad am Stausee -- 2014 -- 8935 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:48, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, St.-Sixtus-Kirche -- 2014 -- 8931 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sufficient for QI, its just a little oversaturated IMO. But ok. --Hubertl 23:01, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Skulptur -Strandläufer- -- 2014 -- 3585.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 12:15, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamm, Haus Uentrop -- 2014 -- 8794 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 05:07, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Quarzwerke, Werkzeughalle -- 2014 -- 4024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Dnalor 01 07:08, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Memmertfeuer -- 2014 -- 3579.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 08:54, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Skulptur -Strandläufer- -- 2014 -- 3588.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:50, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Meerwassererlebnisbad und Haus des Kurgastes -- 2014 -- 3598.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Not perfectly sharp, but though QI for me. --Hubertl 21:41, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Haustür (Friesenstraße) -- 2014 -- 3583.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:47, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Skulptur -Strandläufer- -- 2014 -- 3590.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:06, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Ganz verstehe ich dich nicht...

Ich frage hier Famberhorst um ein besseres Bild (weil das Objekt tatsächlich, entgegen seinen sonstigen Bilder unscharf ist), Famberhorst zieht es zurück und du gibst dem ganzen dann in Folge eine gute Qualität. Was soll ich jetzt tun um auch Famberhorsts Meinung zu respektieren? Eine Contra zu deiner Stimme? Schon ein wenig merkwürdig, scheint mir.--Hubertl (talk) 20:43, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Es ist wie es ist: Blöd gelaufen. Ich hab's in Zwischenzeit einfach nicht gesehen und nach der Betrachtung nur noch die Bewertung gegeben. Ich schaue es mir später in der Diskussion noch einmal genauer an. Die Verwirrung tut mir leid. (Ich hatte einfach mehrere nicht bewertete Bilder aufgemacht, angesehen und dann nur noch die Bewertung gesetzt. Da ich nicht an meinem heimischen PC saß, war alles arg umständlich. Vielleicht sollte ich einfach an solchen Tagen auf das Bewerten verzichten.) --XRay ^talk 05:01, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Studenten-Wohnanlage Boeselagerstraße -- 2014 -- 8238 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:59, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Rathaus -- 2014 -- 3584.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 13:31, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Hafen -- 2014 -- 3576.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 18:57, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

EXIF-Daten

Hallo XRay, Du beanstandest, dass bei meinem Foto des schmutzigen VW Iltis die EXIF-Daten fehlen; ich vermisse sie heute auch. Aber als ich mit der Bildbearbeitung anfing, hatte ich ein Programm, das zusammen mit MS-Word usw. im Office-Paket drin war und das diese Daten verschwinden ließ. Dieses Programm – PhotoDraw soweit ich mich erinnere – war einfach zu handhaben und ich war traurig, als es unter Windows 7 nicht mehr lief. Inzwischen aber bin ich froh, dass ich umstellen musste. Herzliche Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 13:15, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Ich würd's gerade mal als Bemerkung werten, es sollte gar keine Beanstandung sein. Aber dein Bedauern kann ich sehr verstehen. Die heutige Digitale Fotowelt hat so ihre Vor- und auch ihre Nachteile. Ich bin froh, dass mein heutiges Tool die Daten behält, aber nicht, dass es sie abwandelt. (Es ist Adobe Lightroom - immerhin bleiben die Bilder unangetastet, sonst wär's ein KO-Kriterium.)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Schwarze Bude -- 2014 -- 3614.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The picture is good, but IMO you should sharpen it a bit (not much). --Hockei 08:38, 28 February 2015 (UTC)  Fixed Thanks. It's now sharper.--XRay 12:49, 28 February 2015 (UTC)  Support Good now. --Hockei 12:57, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Briefkasten -- 2014 -- 3622.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:46, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Bauarbeiten -- 2014 -- 3617.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:46, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, RWE -- 2014 -- 8348 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:26, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Juist

Hallo Dietmar, die Bearbeitungen deines Bots habe ich nun schon mehrfach rückgängig gemacht:

• File:Leeraner Miniaturland Juist.JPG
• File:Die 12 Stationen.jpg
• File:Die Süßwasserlinse.tif

Die Juister Jahreskategorien sind dort m. E. falsch. Gruß --тнояsтеn ⇔ 18:57, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, ich hab's übersehen. Ich nehme die Dateien sicherheitshalber als Ausnahme auf, dann passiert es nicht wieder. Danke für deinen Hinweis. --XRay ^talk 20:06, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Danke auch. --тнояsтеn ⇔ 06:38, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Wohnanlage Boeselagerstraße -- 2014 -- 8349 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:44, 01 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Feuerwehr -- 2014 -- 3626.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:44, 01 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Friesenhof -- 2014 -- 3638.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:31, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Getränketransport -- 2014 -- 3627.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:37, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Liebesschlösser -- 2014 -- 3599.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Kreuzschnabel 09:00, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Skulptur -Strandläufer- -- 2014 -- 3593.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK, would even do better with horizontal framing and a bit more DoF --Kreuzschnabel 09:00, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soest, St.-Petri-Kirche und St.-Patrokli-Dom -- 2014 -- 8756 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good composition, good lighting and QI -- Spurzem 07:11, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Hotel -Achterdiek- -- 2014 -- 3623.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:43, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Inselkirche -- 2014 -- 3457.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:31, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Rathaus -- 2014 -- 3639.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Personally, I would under and above what cut, but good quality.--Famberhorst 05:55, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Schwarze Bude -- 2014 -- 3613.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 21:55, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warendorf, St.-Josef-Kirche -- 2014 -- 8621 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 22:36, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Wilhelmstraße -- 2014 -- 3618.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:59, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warendorf, St.-Laurentius-Kirche -- 2014 -- 8605 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:43, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Damenpfad -- 2014 -- 3665.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:26, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Skulptur -Strandläufer- -- 2014 -- 3650.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:11, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Informationstafel -- 2014 -- 3657.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 11:11, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Schwarze Bude -- 2014 -- 3616.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, interesting composition. --El Grafo 10:57, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Du hast mich auf die Idee gebracht,

Johann hat aber noch nie ein FP nominiert. Deshalb habe ich es für ihn gemacht. Siehe hier--Hubertl (talk) 00:06, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Inselschule -- 2014 -- 3661.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:46, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Schild am Hafen -- 2014 -- 3573.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment since signs like this are usually white in Germany, the main subject seems to be underexposed. Would it be possible to fix this without completely blowing the sky? --El Grafo 11:07, 27 February 2015 (UTC)  Fixed It's in the shadow ... But hopefully it's fixed now.--XRay 12:03, 27 February 2015 (UTC) @XRay: much better, but now there is a strange horizontal line on the pole just above the sign. --El Grafo 15:02, 27 February 2015 (UTC)  Fixed Thanks. It'S now the same like the first but with a brighter sign.--XRay 06:44, 28 February 2015 (UTC) @XRay: sorry for bothering you again, but now there's a tiny, but very bright rim on the pole just above the sign. --El Grafo 17:19, 3 March 2015 (UTC)  Fixed You're right. Sorry. It's fixed.--XRay 17:28, 4 March 2015 (UTC)  Support now --El Grafo 13:37, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warendorf, St.-Laurentius-Kirche -- 2014 -- 8624 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 10:38, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Inselschule -- 2014 -- 3664.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --El Grafo 10:57, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Strand -- 2014 -- 3658.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --El Grafo 10:59, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Inselschule -- 2014 -- 3663.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:32, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Bentheim, Burg Bentheim -- 2014 -- 9555 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMHO, it leans CCW. --C messier 18:10, 15 March 2015 (UTC) · Yes, otherwise fine. –Be..anyone 18:38, 15 March 2015 (UTC)  Fixed Thanks. You're right. It's fixed.--XRay 16:35, 16 March 2015 (UTC) Could be sharper but good image composition and high encyclopedic value. --NorbertNagel 19:54, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Inselkirche -- 2014 -- 3708.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Inselkirche -- 2014 -- 3707.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:51, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Hafen -- 2014 -- 3689-93.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments One could discuss whether the lens flares are a bug or a feature. In this case I would say they are part of the composition. The sharpness could be a little better, but it's still acceptable. All in all  Support from me. Very nice scene. --Code 19:11, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, ehem. Bahnhof -- 2014 -- 3710.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:46, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Strandzugang -- 2014 -- 3659.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:51, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Hafen -- 2014 -- 3699-703.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Charlesjsharp 10:07, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Havixbeck, Haus Stapel -- 2014 -- 9365 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:51, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, ehem. Bahnhof -- 2014 -- 3711.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:53, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Flugplatz Borkenberge, PKW auf dem Parkplatz -- 2014 -- 0079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:47, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Strandstraße -- 2014 -- 3682.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 12:53, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Havixbeck, Burg Hülshoff -- 2014 -- 9333 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:52, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Meerwassererlebnisbad -- 2014 -- 3715.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:26, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Flugplatz Borkenberge, PKW auf dem Parkplatz -- 2014 -- 0091.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:57, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Auto -- 2014 -- 3994.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments can you add model please? --Charlesjsharp 10:55, 11 March 2015 (UTC) It is a Rover 3500 V8 of the series P6, built from 1963 to 1977. -- Spurzem 15:38, 11 March 2015 (UTC) I've added id to image description. --Charlesjsharp 16:44, 11 March 2015 (UTC)  Comment Thanks!--XRay 17:24, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, St.-Paulus-Dom, Kreuzigungsgruppe -- 2014 -- 3988.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:24, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Skulptur am Hotel Pabst -- 2014 -- 3642.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:35, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Rover

Hallo Dietmar, bei den Quality Images hat jemand nach dem Modell Deines Rover gefragt. Ich habe es ergänzt und – Dein Einverständnis voraussetzend – beim Bild auch die Kategorie eingefügt. Herzliche Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 16:16, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Das ist nicht nur kein Problem, ich bin dir sehr dankbar. Ich hatte erst nach dem Typ gesucht und ihn nicht ausreichend spontan finden können. Da bin ich doch für jede Hilfe dankbar!--XRay ^talk 17:15, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lengerich, LWL-Klinik -- 2014 -- 9810 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:42, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Flugplatz Borkenberge, PKW auf dem Parkplatz -- 2014 -- 0086.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:42, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, St.-Paulus-Dom, Kreuzigungsgruppe -- 2014 -- 3989.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:36, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Hammersee -- 2014 -- 3705.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:45, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warendorf, St.-Marien-Kirche -- 2014 -- 8609 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overall not sharp enough. Could be motion blur? --Dirtsc 21:45, 11 March 2015 (UTC)  Comment Possible. It's a distance of round about 1.500 meters from camera to church.--XRay 16:37, 12 March 2015 (UTC) If I compare it to my QIs made during a balloon flight this one looks quite similar. So QI then. --Dirtsc 22:18, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Skulptur an der Aa -- 2014 -- 3993.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:50, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, WL-Bank -- 2014 -- 3982.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:13, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, St.-Paulus-Dom, Kreuzigungsgruppe -- 2014 -- 3990.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:39, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ochtrup, Welbergen, Haus Welbergen -- 2014 -- 9461 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Nevertheless I would brighten it a bit. --Hockei 08:00, 15 March 2015 (UTC)  Done Thanks. It's brighter now.--XRay 08:58, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Arkaden an der Münsterstraße -- 2014 -- 4321-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:43, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Rathaus -- 2015 -- 4894.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 07:57, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, St.-Joseph-Kirche -- 2015 -- 4885-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:10, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Drubbel -- 2014 -- 3996.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:39, 12 March 2015 (UTC) not quite straight --Charlesjsharp 18:35, 12 March 2015 (UTC)  Fixed Sorry. It's fixed now.--XRay 12:25, 13 March 2015 (UTC) Thanks --Charlesjsharp 09:51, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Greven, Kesselhaus und Ballenlager -- 2014 -- 9869 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good enough of QI. --C messier 17:47, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 4462-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Stunning. Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:41, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Westdeutsche Lotterie -- 2015 -- 01056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:38, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2015 -- 01064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:40, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottuln, Appelhülsen, Haus Groß-Schonebeck -- 2014 -- 9926 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--ArildV 11:11, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Gantepoth -- 2014 -- 4249-53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 06:06, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Rathaus -- 2014 -- 4234-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Shansov.net 19:39, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Bushaltestelle -- 2014 -- 4219-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me. --C messier 17:00, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Christuskirche -- 2015 -- 4957.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:46, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Skulptur -Der gescheiterte Varus- -- 2014 -- 4289-93.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:49, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 4990.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:41, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Stausee, Wehr bei Nacht -- 2015 -- 4855.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality. --Hockei 19:22, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burgsteinfurt, Schloss Burgsteinfurt -- 2014 -- 2447 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:52, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Evangelischer Friedhof -- 2015 -- 4964.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 05:09, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2015 -- 01066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:47, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 01116.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 11:06, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Merschtor -- 2014 -- 4244-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like pictures like this. Good quality but I would sharpen it a bit. I think it is easy to make. --Hockei 18:29, 18 March 2015 (UTC)  Fixed Thanks. It's sharpened now.--XRay 17:33, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Greven, St.-Martinus-Kirche -- 2014 -- 9854 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for QI. --C messier 15:43, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Sonnenaufgang -- 2015 -- 4952.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Sehr schönes Foto, auch mit den zwei Spaziergängern hinten links. Aber was macht der FoP-Baustein auf der Beschreibungsseite? --Code 05:30, 20 March 2015 (UTC)  Fixed Der FoP-Baustein? Der hat der Fotograf geschlampt und ihn übersehen. Danke für den Hinweis, er ist nun weg.--XRay 17:20, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2015 -- 01068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:44, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Alte Schule -- 2014 -- 3629.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 16:03, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Rathaus -- 2015 -- 4903.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Fixed Thanks. It should be fixed now.--XRay 17:38, 18 March 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Moroder 14:08, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Herzlichen Glückwunsch ...

... zu deinem einmal mehr hervorragenden Abschneiden, diesmal beim Picture of the Year 2014! Platz 11 und bestes Bild aus Deutschland, da darfst du stolz drauf sein. VG -- Watzmann ^Talk 20:41, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Vielen Dank! --XRay ^talk 05:02, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

In der Tat! Wir Münsterländer wussten ja schon länger, dass Du in der „Weltelite“ der Commons-Fotografen ganz vorne mitspielst, aber jetzt ist es eben auch offiziell so. Ein sensationeller Erfolg – auch von mir die besten Glückwünsche dazu! --J.-H. Janßen (talk) 10:48, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Herzlichen Dank! Ich weiß fast gar nicht, was ich darauf antworten soll ... --XRay ^talk 11:53, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Gratulation!

Du bist - wie Uwe und Baresi franco - aus meiner Sicht einer der drei "Wikimedianer", die mehr als nur Highlights zum Projekt beitragen. Umso höher ist auch der Erfolg für mich einzuschätzen, denn man kennt sich, auch wenn nur flüchtig, aber man fühlt sich in einem gemeinsamen Projekt. Noch viel gutes Licht wünsche ich Dir auf deinen Streifzügen durch deine Heimatgemeinde und sonstwohin. --Hubertl (talk) 14:12, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Hubertl! Es fällt mir schon fast schwer, darauf zu antworten. Ich bin so ziemlich sprachlos, ist doch damit ein gewisser Anspruch verbunden, dem man genügen soll. Ich danke dir für die ermunternden Worte und die Gratulation! Aber du hast recht, das Projekt "Wikimedia Commons" sehe ich schon als sehr wichtiges Projekt an, denn das gemeinsame Arbeiten an einem digitalen Abbild unserer Welt ist ein Ziel, welches wir uns hier gesteckt haben. (So manchen Kritiker kann ich auch nicht verstehen, denn manche sehen die Unvollständigkeit oder kleine Fehler (auch bei Wikipedia) im Vordergrund, nicht jedoch den Wert des Erreichten.) Und auch die Gemeinsamkeiten bei diversen Projekten, seien es QI, VI oder FP, aber auch Fotoflüge Münsterland und andere, zeigen, was man gemeinsam über alle Grenzen hinweg erreichen kann. Ich sehe es oft auch aus dem Blickwinkel des Denkmal- und Naturschutzes, wobei das digitale Archivieren eine einmalige Chance ist. Es ist schön, dass es doch einige Gleichgesinnte gibt, auch wenn ich mir wünsche, dass es noch mehr sein könnten. Vielen Dank an dich! --XRay ^talk 16:19, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Betrachte es einfach als Resultat deiner unermüdlichen Konsequenz. Qualität immer und immer wieder zu suchen und dann auch noch das Motiv mit dem Glück des Tüchtigen zum richtigen Zeitpunkt zu erkennen. Ich freue mich wirklich auch für Dich. Gleichermaßen wie für Uwe.--Hubertl (talk) 19:07, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 01117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:34, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Terrassensaal -- 2014 -- 3621.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:21, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2015 -- 01069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:34, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kinderwohnheim -- 2015 -- 4931.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:46, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nordwalde, Kulturinsel Bispinghof -- 2014 -- 2567 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:59, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Brunnen am Lambertikirchplatz -- 2014 -- 00798.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI IMHO, can you upload a higher resolution version? --C messier 15:36, 19 March 2015 (UTC)  Fixed Yes. Just done.--XRay 05:44, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Flugplatz, Britten-Norman Islander -- 2014 -- 3706.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Fixed You're right. It's fixed now.--XRay 16:37, 16 March 2015 (UTC)  Fixed Model appended.--XRay 05:49, 21 March 2015 (UTC)Ok now vor me. --Hubertl 17:37, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2015 -- 01058.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:06, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Bahnhofstraße -- 2014 -- 3684-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 06:04, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 4433.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:37, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 4447.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Hubertl 13:54, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2015 -- 01059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:45, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2015 -- 01074.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:42, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Nienberge, St.-Sebastian-Kirche -- 2014 -- 9891 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:16, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Bot, Ortszuordnung

Hallo, den Glückwünschen oben kann ich mich nur anschließen. danke für deine vielen tollen Fotos!

Aber jetzt was anderes. Guck Mal [1] und [2], das kann eigentlich nur an der Einordnung in Category:Naturschutzgebiet Lippeaue (RE-029) liegen, wobei das auch vor [3] schon in mehr als einer Ortskategorie war. Vielleicht kannst du deinem Bot was beibringen, damit Orte nicht durcheinander kommen? Die anderen Bilder vom NSG hab ich schon korrigiert, musst da also nichts mehr machen. Holger1959 (talk) 01:18, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Danke! :-) Und dem Bot bringe ich es natürlich bei. Für derartige Fälle hat er eine Ausnahmeliste. (Daher läuft er auch nur im Münsterland, sonst verliert man den Überblick.)--XRay ^talk 04:41, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2015 -- 01077.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:09, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2015 -- 01063.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:52, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drensteinfurt, Rinkerode, Haus Borg -- 2014 -- 3913 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:31, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 4441.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:35, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 4452.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:22, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2015 -- 01073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:29, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burgsteinfurt, Schloss Burgsteinfurt -- 2014 -- 2436 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me. QI IMO --Hubertl 21:25, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2015 -- 01065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:25, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 4453.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:13, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 4466.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:53, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 4985.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The left border is very distracting; I proposed another crop. --Cccefalon 07:44, 26 March 2015 (UTC)  Fixed Thanks. Yes, it's better. I've uploaded the new version.--XRay 17:07, 26 March 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 21:24, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Skulptur -Strandläufer- -- 2014 -- 3652.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:26, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raesfeld, Schloss Raesfeld -- 2014 -- 2012 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:03, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring -- 2015 -- 01089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 11:57, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Visit Brazil someday!

Hello, XRay! I recommend you visit Brazil. This vast country is home to unique natural life. It is abundant in splendid landscapes. Visit Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Brasília and many other cities! Visit Brazil someday! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:07, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Wonderful images! It seems to be a good place! --XRay ^talk 18:10, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Surely! I am Brazilian, and I see that this country has many beatiful places to photograph! A nice country! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:24, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 5026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:28, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 4460.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:13, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 5008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:35, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 5015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments My deepest sympathy for the air crashed 16 students of your city. Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:23, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 4437.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok and QI for me. --Hubertl 21:13, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 4468.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:16, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 4984.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Unfortunately there are posterized (eg bulb) and oversharpened areas. --Cccefalon 07:23, 28 March 2015 (UTC)  Fixed You're right. I've fixed the image with a new setup. It's better, but good enough for QI?--XRay 08:30, 28 March 2015 (UTC) Agreed, the flaws are gone. Good quality now. --Cccefalon 08:49, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 4989.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:26, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 4991.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:07, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Jüdischer Friedhof -- 2015 -- 5083-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, QI for me --Hubertl 08:23, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raesfeld, Schloss Raesfeld -- 2014 -- 0032 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Hubertl 08:33, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Rosendahl, Schloss Darfeld -- 2014 -- 9396 -- Ausschnitt.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosendahl, Schloss Darfeld -- 2014 -- 9396 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sehr schönes Luftbild. --Frank Schulenburg 04:45, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche -- 2015 -- 5186.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:10, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Kreuz -- 2015 -- 5177.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Watzmann 22:55, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 4462.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:31, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Jüdischer Friedhof -- 2015 -- 5063-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:53, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 4438.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me --Hubertl 08:54, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lengerich, Evangelische Stadtkirche -- 2014 -- 9812 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:42, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 4998-5002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:44, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Kreuz -- 2015 -- 5179.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:29, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, St.-Paulus-Dom, Kreuzigungsgruppe -- 2014 -- 3986.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Ximonic 04:59, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Inseltöpferei -- 2014 -- 3717.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:29, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, LWL-Museum für Naturkunde -- 2014 -- 8245 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:43, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, St.-Paulus-Dom, Skulptur -Kardinal von Galen- -- 2014 -- 3985.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 5012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 04:14, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Bentheim, Burg Bentheim -- 2014 -- 9519 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:03, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Kreuz -- 2015 -- 5182.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:33, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 4997-5001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me. Very interesting! --Ximonic 07:31, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Flugplatz Borkenberge, PKW auf dem Parkplatz -- 2014 -- 0087.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 14:25, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horstmar, Haus Alst -- 2014 -- 2499 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Acceptable IMO for this kind of shot --Poco a poco 05:39, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche -- 2015 -- 5184.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:17, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 4433.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 4433.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:07, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Kreuz -- 2015 -- 5183.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:35, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 5020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:35, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 5017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:59, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ochtrup, Baumschule Böking -- 2014 -- 9485 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 12:59, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Kreuz -- 2015 -- 5180.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:09, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Senden, Baumschule Klabautschke -- 2014 -- 9902 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:08, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 5022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:33, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 5003-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:05, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nordwalde, Kardinal-von-Galen-Gesamtschule -- 2014 -- 2563 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:41, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Rorup, Elektrotankstelle -- 2015 -- 5282.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 07:31, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Rorup, Stolpersteine -- 2015 -- 5268.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments imposing and Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:17, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 5026-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:03, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 5025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:15, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juist, Skulptur -Strandläufer- -- 2014 -- 3655.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:09, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Arc de Triomphe de l'étoile

Hallo Xray, ich habe eine Frage zu deinen Bildern vom Pariser Triumphbogen. Es gibt im Triumphhbogen einträge über Napoleons Schlachten auch in Österreich. Auf einem der Pfeiler soll sich der Name "Hollabrunn" nach einer Schlacht im österreichischen Weinviertel befinden. Eine schon etwas ältere Aufnahme findest du hier. Da ich aus der Region komme, habe ich die Frage, ob du vielleicht auch ein Foto hast, wo man das sehen kann. Ich habe nur das Qualityfoto File:Paris, Triumphbogen -- 2014 -- 1632.jpg vom Sommer letzten Jahres von dir gefunden, wo man auch solche Aufschriften findet. Vielleicht findest du da etwas - muss ja kein Quality sein :-) --vielen Dank im Voraus und noch einen schönen Feiertag. --lg aus Wien K@rl (talk) 19:01, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Hallo! Leider habe ich an dem Tag kaum Aufnahmen (am Triumphbogen) gemacht. Es war sehr verregnet.--XRay ^talk 04:57, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Schade, war nur eine Frage - aber sonst gratuliere ich zu deinen super Fotos --lg aus Wien K@rl (talk) 08:06, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 4985-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:43, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Vorpark, Mammutbaum -- 2015 -- 5290.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:16, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Appelhülsen, Haus Giesking -- 2014 -- 9931 -- Ausschnitt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 05:00, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Rathaus -- 2015 -- 5100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:38, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, Kreuz -- 2015 -- 5181.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:36, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Neue QI-Kategorie

Hallo Dietmar, Du hast es ja schon bemerkt: Ich habe gerade eine neue QI-Kategorie für die Vorhängeschlösser angelegt; es sind ja doch schon einige! Ich wollte mich an der Stelle auch nochmal ausdrücklich bedanken, dass Du gelegentlich aus meinem Kandidaten-Pool ein Bild für QIC nominierst. Darüber habe ich mich jedesmal sehr gefreut. Dir noch einen schönen Ostermontag, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 10:09, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Freut mich sehr. Ebenso noch einen schönen Ostermontag! Ich habe derzeit - nach Monaten - keine Bilder als QI-Kandidaten mehr auf Lager und wenn ich dann sowieso am Computer bin, kann ich ja auch Bilder von anderen nominieren. Und du hast sie ja so schön vorsortiert ... Es freut mich, wenn ich helfen kann. --XRay ^talk 10:41, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Danke :) Ich habe derzeit einen Bearbeitungsrückstand von mehr als 10.000 Bildern. Davon sind nicht alle QI-geeignet, aber mit der Beschränkung auf 5 Bilder pro Tag wird es eh noch eine Weile dauern, bis ich die Füsse hochlegen kann. Ach ja, es gibt da einen übereifrigen Admin, der beim Hochladen von professionellen Photos mit lockeren Lizenzregeln vermutet, es könne sich um ein Ausnutzen von Commons zum eigenen Vorteil handeln. Nur zur Info, Da Du ein ähnliches Lizenztemplate verwendest. Gruss, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 11:26, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Netter Hinweis, danke! Es ist schon erstaunlich, dass ein derartiger Verdacht aufkommen kann. Aber letztendlich sollte das doch völlig egal sein, wenn denn die Lizenz stimmt. --XRay ^talk 12:07, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Ich finde es eine schiere Frechheit, wenn sowas von einem Admin kommt. So etwas nennt man "ehrabschneidende Äußerung". Wenn mich Colin nicht informiert hätte, hätte ich mich nicht mal dazu äußern können. Naja, ich behalte den Kerl mal im Auge. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 12:36, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Ich finde es auch unhöflich, über jemanden und nicht mit jemandem zu sprechen, aber ein ähnliches Thema hatte ich auch schon. Es ging dabei um eine Formulierung in meinem Text, der die CC-Lizenz eingeschränkt hat - unabsichtlich. Quasi zu unterstellen, die Lizenz zu unterwandern, ist schon eine ungeschickte Unterstellung, aber vielleicht gar nicht so gemeint. Ich versuche es lieber positiv zu sehen. Diese rechtlichen Dinge rauben mir nochmal den letzten Nerv. Da wird uns Fotografen ganz schön was abverlangt, nicht nur bei den Lizenzen. (Aber ganz ehrlich, mich würde das auch ärgern.)--XRay ^talk 17:23, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

neue Vorlage?

Hallo, hab gesehen, dass Template:Photographs taken on navbox von dir ist. Kannst du sowas vielleicht auch für die Monatskategorien wie Category:October 1914 photographs erstellen? wär sehr praktisch zum besseren Durchklicken. Würd das auch selbst machen, aber ich kapier den Vorlagen Code leider nicht so ganz. Für die Jahre gibts Template:PhotographsYear, sieht ein bißchen anders aus, erfüllt aber genauso seinen Zweck. Holger1959 (talk) 18:16, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Ich schaue mal. Sieht nicht sehr schwierig aus.--XRay ^talk 07:17, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Hallo @Holger1959: ! Schaust du dir das Template Template:PhotographsYearByMonth bitte mal an. (Bei Category:October 1914 photographs habe ich es aufgenommen.) Das ist sozusagen der erste Wurf. Ich habe allerdings noch keine Ahnung, wie ich ganz galant die Monatsnamen in die Landessprache übersetzt bekomme, am besten automatisch nach eingestellter Sprache.--XRay ^talk 12:02, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Doch gefunden. Nun passt die Sprache. Die Langtexte sind derzeit aber nur auf Deutsch und Englisch verfügbar.--XRay ^talk 12:08, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Super, vielen dank! Wenn da noch wer was übersetzen oder verbessern will macht das ja kein Problem, weil für die Einbindung einheitlich nur YYYY und MM nötig ist. Für den Rest reichts dann die Vorlage zu ändern. Das macht vieles einfacher. Hab schon ein paar Monatskategorien gesehen, die unterschiedlich kategorisiert oder mit "handgemachten" Einleitungen versehen sind. Viele gibts aber auch noch gar nicht. Das müsst jetzt nur noch durchgehend ergänzt werden, älteste Tageskategorie bislang ist Category:Photographs taken on 1880-08-01. Weiß nicht, wenns nicht zuviel Arbeit macht könntest du das vielleicht mit deinem Bot machen, aber muss glaub ich nicht sein, das wird sich schon von selbst erledigen, und ich würd mir zuerst die schon vorhandenen Monatskategorien vornehmen. Holger1959 (talk) 12:28, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Kann ich so spontan nicht beantworten, aber ich schaue mal, ob die Änderung per Bot möglich ist.--XRay ^talk 13:34, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

lass ruhig, hab schon fast die Hälfte durch und du hast ja schon genug geholfen :) Holger1959 (talk) 14:36, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Karthaus, Torhaus -- 2015 -- 5381.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:45, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Karthaus, Haus -- 2015 -- 5343.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:16, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Ehem. Getreidemühle -- 2015 -- 5366.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:44, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Karthaus, Torhaus -- 2015 -- 5378.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:43, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Kreuz an der St.-Jakobus-Kirche -- 2015 -- 5331.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overall good quality. But it's tilted cw; please correct that. --Cccefalon 06:40, 9 April 2015 (UTC)  Fixed Thanks. It's fixed.--XRay 07:17, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Ehem. Getreidemühle -- 2015 -- 5368.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:20, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Ehem. Getreidemühle -- 2015 -- 5372.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:07, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mausoleum of the family Bendix (Meyer und Sara Bendix), Jewish cemetery, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:23, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
South front of the Manor Osthoff in Dulmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:25, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Eingang zu einem Wohnhaus -- 2015 -- 5390.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --Livioandronico2013 19:07, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Bildstock in Karthaus -- 2015 -- 5386.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 17:30, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Eingang zu einem Wohnhaus -- 2015 -- 5388.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 14:29, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Eingang zu einem Wohnhaus -- 2015 -- 5387.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 14:29, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Bildstock in Karthaus -- 2015 -- 5382.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 17:30, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Dernekamp, Kiffertbach -- 2015 -- 5408.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:33, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Ehrenfriedhof -- 2015 -- 5402.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:31, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Feld -- 2015 -- 5405.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:50, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Ehrenfriedhof -- 2015 -- 5398.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:28, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Eingang zu einem Wohnhaus -- 2015 -- 5392.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--ArildV 07:34, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Ehrenfriedhof -- 2015 -- 5400.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:39, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Gartentor -- 2015 -- 5410.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:39, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Bildstock in Karthaus -- 2015 -- 5383.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Can you turn it to the right?--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 07:45, 12 April 2015 (UTC)  Comment @Tobias "ToMar" Maier: Sorry, the relief inside is tilted CCW itself. It's older than the frame and IMO the frame isn't tilted. Please have a look again and/or compare with this image: Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Bildstock in Karthaus -- 2015 -- 5382.jpg.--XRay 08:33, 12 April 2015 (UTC) I'm fine with it now. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 13:05, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alt St. Alban (front view) in Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:11, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Inselkirche (front view) in Juist, Lower Saxony, Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good and useful. Yann (talk) 19:15, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Baumengel -- 2015 -- 5515.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:42, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Baumengel -- 2015 -- 5514.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:47, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Baumengel -- 2015 -- 5513.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:00, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Baumengel -- 2015 -- 5512.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:47, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 5012.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Haltern am See, Sythen, Werkzeughalle der Quarzwerke -- 2015 -- 5012.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Skulptur am Großen Spieker -- 2015 -- 5493.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:56, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Skulptur am Großen Spieker -- 2015 -- 5495.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:03, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Albachten, Molchschleuse -- 2015 -- 5452.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:24, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Albachten, Molchschleuse -- 2015 -- 5454.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:34, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Albachten, Molchschleuse -- 2015 -- 5449.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:43, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Baumengel -- 2015 -- 5510.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 11:18, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Catholic public library, Appelhülsen

Hallo Dietmar, nimm es mir bitte nicht übel, aber mir scheint der linke Teil des Büchereigebäudes auf dem Foto immer noch leicht nach links hinten wegzukippen, obwohl – oder gerade weil? – die Linien senkrecht stehen. Irgendetwas muss bei der Bearbeitung nicht so geklappt haben, wie es sein sollte. Oder ich täusche mich sehr. Bitte nichts für ungut und herzliche Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 12:36, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Bei der Bearbeitung hatte ich den Eindruck, dass die Fenster oben und unten nicht in einer Linie stehen. Wahrscheinlich kippt das Bild daher nach links. Ich korrigiere das zurück und dann müsste es passen. Danke für den Hinweis. --XRay ^talk 13:22, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Es gibt so Bilder, da weiß man echt nicht, was wirklich gerade ist. Du hattest recht, es war nach links gedreht. Ich habe Zaun, Fenster und Laterne auf dem Bild geprüft, es ist meiner Meinung alles stimming, aber es sind nicht alle Linien parallel. Mein Eindruck ist, dass die Fenster in dem Haus nicht ganz gerade sind. Aber so wie es jetzt ist, müsste es OK sein. Danke noch einmal für dein gutes Auge, welches dieses Problem erkannt hat!--XRay ^talk 17:16, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Geländer am Mühlteich -- 2015 -- 4486.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:28, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Wegweiser am Torhaus -- 2015 -- 5610.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:52, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Stromverteiler -- 2015 -- 5607.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:20, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Skulptur am Großen Spieker -- 2015 -- 5496.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is some overexposure but overall QI to me --Poco a poco 11:13, 19 April 2015 (UTC)  Fixed Overexposed areas fixed. Thanks for your advice.--XRay 12:56, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Wegweiser -- 2015 -- 5498.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 22:01, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, St.-Jakobus-Kirche -- 2015 -- 5520.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 16:04, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, St.-Jakobus-Kirche -- 2015 -- 5549.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 07:20, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Borgmühle in Lüdinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:23, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Burg Vischering (view from east) in Lüdinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:24, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottuln, Appelhülsen, Katholische öffentliche Bücherei -- 2015 -- 5467.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The left part of the house seems to be a bit distorted. -- Spurzem 16:50, 20 April 2015 (UTC)  Fixed Thanks. It's fixed now.--XRay 17:23, 20 April 2015 (UTC)  Comment I've found another problem and uploaded just a new version. Thanks to Spurzem. --XRay 17:18, 21 April 2015 (UTC) OK -- Spurzem 20:01, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Winners of Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 - Wiki4Alps edition

WLM CH (Deutsch) Liebe Teilnehmerin/Lieber Teilnehmer von Wiki Loves Monuments CH Gerne bedanken wir uns hiermit noch einmal für deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb WLM. Die Liste der Gewinner kann nun auf unserer Website sowie auch auf Wikimedia Commons eingesehen werden. Wir gratulieren den Gewinnerinnen und Gewinnern, die wir persönlich kontaktieren werden, ganz herzlich. Der Verein Wikimedia CH trifft gerade die Vorbereitungen für Wiki Loves Earth 2015, ein Fotowettbewerb rund um das Thema Natur und Nationalparks. Dieser neue Fotowettbewerb wird bereits am 1.Mai 2015 starten. Wir freuen uns sehr, wenn ihr wieder mit dabei seid! Mit besten Grüssen, Das Organisationsteam

WLM CH (Français) Cher/chère participant(e) au concours Wiki Loves Monuments CH, La liste des gagnants est disponible sur le site ainsi que sur son pendant Wikimedia Commons! Nos félicitations aux vainqueurs, qui seront contactés séparément. Wikimedia CH se prépare maintenant pour Wiki Loves Earth 2015, un concours photographique consacré à la nature et aux parcs, qui débutera le 1er mai prochain et auquel nous vous invitons à participer! Meilleurs messages, Le Comité d’organisation

WLM CH (English) Dear Wiki Loves Monuments CH participant, We would like to inform you that the list of winners has been published on our website as well as on Wikimedia Commons - our congratulations to the winners, who will be contacted individually. Wikimedia CH is now gearing up for Wiki Loves Earth 2015, a photo contest dedicated to the nature and to parks. This new contest will start on May 1st, 2015: feel free to join! With our best regards, The organization's committee

WLM CH (Italiano) Gentile partecipante a Wiki Loves Monuments CH Vogliamo informarti che la lista dei vincitori é stata pubblicata sul nostro sito come anche su Wikimedia Commons - le nostre congratulazioni ai vincitori, che saranno contattati individualmente. Wikimedia CH sta ora organizzando u nuovo concorso per Wiki Loves Earth 2015 dedicato alla natura e ai parchi. Questo concorso inizierà l'1 maggio 2015: ci auguriamo di avervi tra i nostri concorrenti! Saluti, Il Comitato Organizzatore

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, St.-Jakobus-Kirche -- 2015 -- 5587.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:19, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, St.-Jakobus-Kirche -- 2015 -- 5551.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:18, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottuln, Appelhülsen, Pfarramt -- 2015 -- 5472.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 16:44, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Stromverteiler -- 2015 -- 5609.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 05:50, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, St.-Jakobus-Kirche -- 2015 -- 5583.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me.--Johann Jaritz 06:24, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Lightroom 6

Danke fürs Review von File:Berlin Hauptbahnhof Ostseite HDR.jpg. Wie ich sehe, nutzt Du auch Lightroom 6. Ich finde die HDR-Funktion dort sehr, sehr gelungen und ich glaube, jetzt wird HDR auch endlich für mich brauchbar. Das Bild war der erste Versuch und ich bin mit dem Ergebnis ganz glücklich. Bislang war mir HDR einfach zu umständlich und mit den Ergebnissen z.B. von Luminance HDR war ich auch nicht zufrieden. Hast Du Dich auch schon daran versucht? Viele Grüße! --Code (talk) 12:58, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Ja, auch mit Picturenaut und Luminance HDR. Beide waren aber nicht so wirklich toll und haben auch sehr lange gerechnet. Danach habe ich mit Photomatix Pro angeschafft und bin damit sehr zufrieden. (Eine halbwegs aktuelle Liste ist hier: User:XRay/Gallery/Tone-mapped HDR images.) Lightroom 6 habe ich noch nicht wirklich angesehen. Ich wollte nur unbedingt bei einem Bild einen Fehler beheben, der sich bis Lightroom 5.7 durchgezogen hat. Bilder mit der Canon EOS 70D aus dem RAW-Format und Lightroom 5.x (oder dem RAW-Konverter bis 8.7) erzeugen u. U. einen Magenta-Stich in den hellen Bereichen. Das Bild ist nun korrigiert und nun muss ich noch alle Bilder des (geschätzt) letzten Jahres kontrollieren und ggf. korrigieren. :-( --XRay ^talk 13:10, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Hausdülmen, Blüten der -Dülmener Rose- -- 2015 -- 5697.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:41, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring, Grab -Johannes Leppich- -- 2015 -- 5663.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:35, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Skulptur am Großen Spieker -- 2015 -- 5497.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:18, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Schloss -- 2014 -- 6769-71.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:28, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Köln, Deutsches Sport & Olympia Museum -- 2014 -- 1829.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 16:26, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Naturschutzgebiet -Karthäuser Mühlenbach- -- 2014 -- 0222.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good, QI for me--Lmbuga 17:00, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Westdeutsche Lotterie -- 2015 -- 5721.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:49, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Jesuitenfriedhof -- 2015 -- 5719.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:21, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, St.-Jakobus-Kirche -- 2015 -- 5596.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 12:31, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winterswijk (NL), Woold, Boven Slinge -- 2014 -- 3124.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Romantic creek. Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 05:39, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Naturschutzgebiet -Karthäuser Mühlenbach- -- 2015 -- 4478.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:07, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring, Naturdenkmal -- 2015 -- 5650.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 05:41, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vragender (NL), Vragenderveen -- 2014 -- 3092.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice habitat. Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 05:43, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winterswijk (NL), Korenburgerveen -- 2014 -- 3075.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Johann Jaritz 05:18, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring, Naturdenkmal -- 2015 -- 5649.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not perfect, but close enough --Poco a poco 17:24, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Naturschutzgebiet -Karthäuser Mühlenbach- -- 2015 -- 4479.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Looks too dark for me. Can you brighten it? --Hockei 06:15, 3 May 2015 (UTC)  Fixed Thanks. Shadows are now brighter.--XRay 07:17, 3 May 2015 (UTC)  Support I like the effect of the tree against the sky. Slightly sharpening would be good but anyway a good picture. --Hockei 07:43, 3 May 2015 (UTC)  Comment It's now a little bit sharper. Thanks.--XRay 07:52, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster, Park Sentmaring, Naturdenkmal -- 2015 -- 5651.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Appealing composition. Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:16, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vragender (NL), Vragenderveen -- 2014 -- 3093.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:59, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winterswijk (NL), Korenburgerveen -- 2014 -- 3076.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:20, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winterswijk (NL), Woold, Boven Slinge -- 2014 -- 3127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:00, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Pferdemagnolie?

Hallo, ich glaub beim Baum File:Münster, Park Sentmaring, Naturdenkmal -- 2015 -- 5711.jpg musst du noch Mal nachgucken, das sieht nicht nach Magnolie aus (eher nach einer japanischen Zierkirsche oder sowas). Holger1959 (talk) 01:29, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Wir waren zu zweit in dem Park. Die Blüten haben wir auch nicht direkt als Magnolie identifiziert, aber eine Pferdemagnolie kennen wir nicht. Aber es war der einzige Busch im ganzen Park, der auf die Beschreibung passte. Es ist ja Blütezeit. Und er steht auch an einem Ort, der in der Karte als Standort eines Naturdenkmals verzeichnet ist. (Leider gibt es keine Zuordnung der Karte zur Nummer in der Liste der Naturdenkmäler.) Ich schaue aber im Laufe der Woche noch einmal in dem Park vorbei.--XRay ^talk 04:58, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

BTW: Hast du eine Idee, wer sich mit Pflanzen auskennt und genauer sagen kann, was auf dem Bild ist? So spontan finde ich bei Wikipedia kein Forum dafür.--XRay ^talk 05:08, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Gute Idee, das mit dem Nachschauen nach der Magnolie. Zum rosa Baum guck Mal bei der Bestimmungsseite rein, die sind sehr gut und schnell bei solchen Sachen. Auf Commons geht auch Category:Unidentified plants aber das dauert oft lange bis es wer entdeckt. (Bilder, die man in Category:Unidentified birds packt, sind hingegen ist meist schon nach 1 Tag identifiziert, dank User MPF.) Holger1959 (talk) 05:12, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Du lagst mit deinem Tipp richtig. Ich habe die Bilder aus dem Wettbewerb genommen. Jetzt (= nächste Woche) gehe ich noch mal auf die Suche nach der Magnolie.--XRay ^talk 05:48, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Nächstes Problemchen: Bei File:Dülmen, Vorpark, Mammutbaum -- 2015 -- 5294.jpg und File:Dülmen, Vorpark, Mammutbaum -- 2015 -- 5286.jpg find ich grade nichts für WLE. Naturdenkmal? Soll heißen: ggf Beschreibung ergänzen und in Kategorie packen. Holger1959 (talk) 07:01, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Zu dem Baum habe ich keine Informationen. Es gibt in Dülmen keine Liste mit Naturdenkmälern, zumindest komme ich so nicht an diese Liste. Zur Not muss ich auch diesen Baum als WLE-Beitrag entfernen.--XRay ^talk 07:11, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Die Naturdenkmale sind im GIS-Portal des Kreises Coesfeld verzeichnet. Für Dülmen sind dort zwei Winterlinden, eine Buche, ein paar Eichen und ein nicht weiter identifizierbares Objekt aufgeführt. Deine Mammutbäume sind leider nicht dabei. Aber das sind ja auch keine einheimischen Pflanzen. VG-- Watzmann ^Talk 17:47, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Danke! Dann nehme ich sie heraus (und schau mich in Dülmen um.) --XRay ^talk 17:51, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kriemhildmühle in Xanten, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Is titl cw and perspektive problems (top sides is lenning in). --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:47, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

•  Fixed Thanks for your advice. It's fixed.--XRay ^talk 04:16, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:12, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schloss Sythen (Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany); view from street side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:32, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dülmen, Viktorkirmes auf dem Overbergplatz -- 2014 -- 3738 (2).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Viktorkirmes auf dem Overbergplatz -- 2014 -- 3738 (2).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vragender (NL), Vragenderveen -- 2014 -- 3094.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 15:37, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Naturschutzgebiet -Karthäuser Mühlenbach- -- 2015 -- 4484.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 15:37, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted/layout

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Commons:Photo challenge/2015 - May - Panoramas

The photo challenge page asks "Please do not nominate lots of similar photos; instead choose just your best and most varied images." The two pictures you submitted are very similar -- one being a wider panorama taken much the same time. I know it is only two photos, but still. Doing this will encourage others to submit perhaps lots of very similar photos. And it is asking the reviewers to choose between those two, when they only have three votes for perhaps a hundred photos. So no only does it potentially split any vote your images might earn, but in a way you are asking reviewers to do your job for you: deciding which of your own similar photos are the best. For what it is worth, I prefer File:Münster, Hafen -- 2015 -- 5830.jpg. In the other File:Münster, Hafen -- 2015 -- 5823.jpg, the corners showing the grass make it very obvious this is a distorted panorama, and the red buoy in the water is a bit distracting. -- Colin ([[User talk:Colin|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:03, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. I'd removed one image. --XRay ^talk 15:47, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Commons:Photo challenge/2015 - March - Black and White/Winners

Template:Photo Challenge Bronze

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Mann, bist du schnell!

Template:Smile ---- Watzmann ^Talk 17:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Reiner Zufall. Ich war gerade bei eine anderen Sache und da sah ich die Änderung und dachte mir, dass ich dir die Arbeit abnehmen kann.--XRay ^talk 17:41, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Category:2013 in Norderney

Hallo, hier [4] hat dein Bot eine falsche Schlussfolgerung gezogen und ein Bild aus Norddeich nach Norderney gepackt, wahrscheinlich wegen der Schiffskategorien. In den Jahreskategorien sind offenbar noch ein paar so Bilder falsch drin. Kannst dir das ja Mal angucken, wenn du Zeit hast. Ich hab nur das eine Bild aus der Norderney-Kategorie entfernt. Gruß Holger1959 ([[User talk:Holger1959|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:15, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Schaue ich mir an. Danke für den Hinweis. --XRay ^talk 03:39, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Frage zu Kategorisierung 'by year'

Hallo, XRay, ich habe mich heute mal in der Category:Telgte betätigt. Ich habe eine Frage zu der Category:Telgte by year. Da habe ich den tieferen Sinn noch nicht erkannt. Ist das so gewollt, dass (einzelne) Bilder da einzelnen Jahren zugeordnet sind, oder sind das eher so Notkategorisierungen, bevor man keine andere hat. Die Category:Telgte by year ist in Category:History of Telgte eingehängt. Wenn ein User da landet, erwartet er wahrscheinlich geschichtliche Inhalte. Da liefert ihm z.B. die Category:2008 in Telgte Bilder aus unterschiedlichen Themenbereichen, die mit dem Jahr 2008 nicht so ganz viel zu tun haben, außer das Aufnahmedatum. Wie ist das Ganze zu verstehen? Wenn z.B. die beiden Bilder vom Jüdischen Friedhof in eine inhaltlich geeignete Kategorie eingeordnet sind - so geschehen -, wäre mir danach, sie aus diesem "historischen" Bereich herauszunehmen. Viele Grüße! --Coyote III ([[User talk:Coyote III|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:10, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Nein, es sind keine Notkategorien. Alle Bilder werden geschichtlich den passenden Jahren zugeordnet. Ich bin darauf gekommen, weil J.-H. Janßen sie immer setzt. Manuell war mir das zu aufwändig, daher macht dies mittlerweile ein Skript von mir. (Es läuft regelmäßig in den Kategorien des Münsterlands und ordner die Bilder ein. Das würde von Hand Jahre dauern.) Und in 2008 sollte man auch Bilder finden, die etwas mit den Jahr zu tun haben. Immerhin liefert das Template Information ja die richtige Information, denn bei Date steht ja "Date of creation, when the original source was created." (Und allein sollte eine der Jahreskategorien nie stehen, eine quasi richtige Einsortierung halte ich persönlich unbedingt für nötig. Aber im Grunde schließe ich mich J.-H. Janßen an, denn jedes Bild hat ein Entstehungsjahr. Und in ein paar Jahren sind die Bilder dann Teil der Geschichte ...)--XRay ^talk 12:18, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, ich wollte dich nicht kritisieren, vielmehr bin ich so selten bei Commons, dass ich kaum Einblick in die Gepflogenheiten habe. OK, dann ist das wohl so. Danke für die Antwort! Viele Grüße, --Coyote III ([[User talk:Coyote III|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:24, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Hoppla. Empfand ich gar nicht als Kritik. Aber wenn du es so schreibst ... ;-) Nee, alles klar. Kein Problem. Aber auch ich wundere mich immer mal über diverse Dinge ... Danke für deine Kategorisierungen!--XRay ^talk 12:32, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

;-) -der Stammtisch war übrigens sehr schön. Bis demnächst dann. Grüße, --Coyote III ([[User talk:Coyote III|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:35, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Wobei ich zu obiger Diskussion noch ergänzend klarstellen möchte, dass ich nicht Erfinder dieser Jahres-, Monats- und Tageskategorien bin. Ich bin auch nur andernorts darüber gestolpert und nutze sie nun (über-)eifrig. Ganz nach dem Motto: Kategorien, die in der Wiki-Welt sind, wollen auch gefüllt werden! Wenn man sich das z.B. für die Städte London oder Moskau ansieht, bekommt man eine Ahnung davon, wie tiefgehend sich das auswachsen kann. In den Weiten der Commons-Kategorien entdeckt man schließlich fast täglich neue Schubladen, in die man auch etwas hineinpacken kann. Und in der Tat: Auch der gestrige Tag ist bereits Geschichte... Ja, der XRayBot - sicher grundsätzlich eine Hilfe, aber mit gewissen Schwächen und manchmal leider auch ein wahrlich schlimmer Finger, da er korrigierendes Feinsortieren von Hand stets rückgängig macht. Konkretes Beispiel: Der CDU-Europaabgeordnete Markus Pieper aus Lotte. Egal, ob die jeweilige Aufnahme Piepers nun de facto 2014 in Straßburg entstand - der Bot schiebt sie immer wieder in die Kategorie 2014 in Lotte (Westfalen). Zu sehen etwa [5]. Ich habe es aber aufgegeben, hier noch einzugreifen. Denn in einem Edit War mit einem Bot kann man nur den Kürzeren ziehen. Was Bots für ein Chaos anrichten können, zeigen ja unzählige Fehlkategorisierungen von Bildern, die aus dem britischen Geograph-Projekt übernommen worden sind. Für die Grafschaft Lincolnshire arbeite ich dort schon seit mittlerweile einigen Jahren händisch hinterher. Da sind Bilder nicht nur regelmäßig den falschen Städten und Gemeinden zugeordnet, sondern teils auch falschen Grafschaften oder schlimmstenfalls sogar völlig unkategorisiert hineingeklatscht worden. Gewiss, fast ein Fass ohne Boden. Aber mit Commons als Bilder-Rumpelkammer kann man schließlich auch nicht glänzen. Gruß --J.-H. Janßen ([[User talk:J.-H. Janßen|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:51, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Jepp, J.-H. Janßen, du bist nicht der Erfinder, aber du hast mich darauf gebracht. Und wenn mein Bot falsche Einordnungen macht, dann kann ich das anpassen. Klar, es ist ein Skript und er kann nicht ahnen, welchem Ort die Datei wirklich zugeordnet ist. Aber er soll Hilfe sein und keine Fehler verursachen. Er lässt prinzipell beispielsweise folgende Kategorien aus: People of ..., Transport in ... und Things named after .... (Markus Pieper steht übrigens auch auf der Ausnahmeliste.) Wenn du noch Vorschläge für Ausnahmen hast, sag einfach Bescheid. Ich kann dir auch mal direkt eine komplette Liste der Ausnahmen schicken. Gemeinsam sollten wir doch weiterkommen, oder?--XRay ^talk 13:02, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Der Bot lässt eben besagte Kategorien leider eben doch nicht aus, jedenfalls ganz offensichtlich dann nicht, wenn diese sich mit anderen Kategorien überschneiden, deren Bearbeitung ihm erlaubt ist. Und so etwas kommt ja regelmäßig vor. Das funktioniert also offenbar nicht richtig bzw. nicht so, wie eigentlich gewünscht. Mir würde es eigentlich schon völlig reichen, wenn der Bot so programmiert wäre, dass er Feinsortierungen akzeptiert. Aber Du kannst mir die besagte Liste ja gern mal zukommen lassen. Vielleicht hilft sie mir beim Verständnis. Gruß --J.-H. Janßen ([[User talk:J.-H. Janßen|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:37, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Zwei QI-Nominierungen von mir vom 26.05.

Moin! Vielleicht mal hier, bevor wir bei der Nominierung hin und her diskutieren. ;-) Ich habe bei dem zweiten der beiden Bilder versucht die Halos zu reduzieren, das war aber nicht von besonders viel Erfolg gekrönt. Ich befürchte, die kamen nicht aus der Nachbearbeitung sondern waren schon im Bild vorhanden, das die Kamera geliefert hat. Und Du hast vollkommen Recht, wenn Du sagst, das zweite Bild wäre eher schlechter als das erste. Das sehe ich genauso. Allerdings verstehe ich mittlerweile Deine zweite Anmerkung nicht. Zuerst sagst Du, die Bilder seien zu stark geschärft, danach kommt, das Bild würde mehr Kontrast benötigen. Das Bild ist doch aber schon extrem kontrastreich, es gibt sehr helle Bereiche und sehr dunkle Bereiche. Beides entspricht auch der realen Beleuchtung an dem fraglichen Tag. Vielleicht kannst Du mir hier etwas ausführlicher erklären, was Deiner Ansicht nach geändert werden sollte. Viele Grüße, --Dirtsc ([[User talk:Dirtsc|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:21, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Es ist immer ein wenig schwierig, kann ich verstehen. Trotz kalibriertem Monitor bleiben Zweifel. Schärfe und Kontrast sind zweierlei, aber so wie ich das sehe, ist das für dich nichts neues. Insgesamt würde ich lediglich den Kontrast ein wenig anheben. Wenn ich die Fenster in dem Gebäude so sehe, kann ich kaum Rahmen von Fenster unterscheiden. Wenn du sagst, dass es so war, dann ist das aus meiner Sicht OK. Mal eine Frage: Sind die Halos auch im RAW? Dein Bild schaue ich mir noch einmal an, bitte hebe aber den Kontrast noch ein wenig an. --18:36, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Bevor ich es vergesse. Ich würde das Bild beschneiden. Das halbe Auto links stört und wahrscheinlich ist auch das Haus links nicht Teil des Motivs. Bei dem zweiten Bild sehe ich übrigens keine Aktualisierung. Hast du vergessen, es hochzuladen? --XRay ^talk 18:42, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Ich werfe heute abend noch mal einen Blick auf die Bilder, dann sitze ich wieder an dem Computer mit der Bildbearbeitungssoftware. Danke für die Hinweise. Das zweite Bild hatte ich bewusst nicht geändert, damit man ggf. sehen kann, ob meine Bemühungen zu Verbesserungen geführt haben. Leider gehst auch Du davon aus, dass ein RAW-Bild existiert. ;-) Ich hatte bisher immer nur direkt als Jpg fotografiert. Die erste längere Fototour, die ich direkt mit RAW-Fotos gemacht habe, war tatsächlich erst Ende Mai. Vorher habe ich mich an die Nachbearbeitung nicht ran getraut. Aber dann war es auch nicht schwerer als vorher. Zukünftig mache ich alles in RAW. Ich melde mich, wenn ich mir die Bilder noch mal angesehen habe. Gruß --Dirtsc ([[User talk:Dirtsc|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:47, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Bei beiden Bildern habe ich noch mal am Kontrast gedreht. Wirf mal bitte einen Blick drauf. Das mit dem Auto ist ein wenig merkwürdig, da hast Du schon recht. Wenn ich das aber abschneide, dann verschwindet auch das Haus ganz rechts zu mehr als der Hälfte. Und da ich den Straßenzug von Kirche und den drei Häusern einfangen wollte, würde ein meiner Ansicht nach wichtiger Teil fehlen. Danke für die Geduld bisher! Gruß --Dirtsc ([[User talk:Dirtsc|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:53, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Für QI reicht es meiner Meinung nach, aber weder das abgeschnittene Auto noch das angeschnittene Haus sind wirklich optimal. Ein Panorama oder eine kürzere Brennweite wären hilfreich gewesen. Und man hätte auch bei der Blende noch etwas zulegen können. Beim nächsten Mal. Eine feine Kamera hast du ja. Und es gibt schöne Weitwinkel ab 10 mm Brennweite. Das 10-22-mm-Zoom von Canon war seinerzeit mein zweites Objektiv (nach dem etwas klapprigen Kit-Objektiv). Es eröffnete neue Welten. --XRay ^talk 17:35, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Wie ich gesehen habe, habe ich tatsächlich das 18-200-mm drauf gehabt, aber da hätte ich vielleicht wirklich (zumindest bei der Straßenszene) das 10-22-mm nehmen sollen. Das ist übrigens auch meine Wahl für mein zweites Objektiv gewesen. Das ursprüngliche Kit-Objektiv hatte ich gar nicht erst mitgekauft. Und es stimmt, das 10-22-mm ist meiner Ansicht nach ein richtig gutes Objektiv, mir macht es immer wieder Spaß damit zu fotografieren. Allerdings habe ich gerade kein aktuelles Bild, das mit dem Objektiv entstanden ist. Die meisten liegen für WLM in Warteposition und müssen auch noch bearbeitet werden. Gruß --Dirtsc ([[User talk:Dirtsc|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:12, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Irgendwie ähnelt sich vieles. Das Kit-Objektiv (18-135) ist zwar klapprig, aber es leistet gute Dienste. Zur zweiten DSLR habe ich dann statt des Kit-Objektivs ein 15-85 als Immerdrauf genommenen. Es ist besser, aber auch deutlich schwerer. Man kann halt nicht nur Vorteile haben. BTW: Auch bei mir warten Bilder auf den September, aber nicht mehr so viele wie im letzten Jahr. Ich gebe mir Mühe, eine bessere Auswahl und eine bessere Qualität zu erreichen. --XRay ^talk 18:04, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:02, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:02, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:05, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

A barnstar for you!

	int:wikilove-barnstar-photographers-title
	2000 Quality Images sind eine große Leistung. Gratulation! Hubertl ([[User talk:Hubertl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:48, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Danke, Hubertl! Es freut mich, wenn ich Bilder zu Wikipedia/Wikimedia beitragen kann, und hoffe, dass sich viele andere inspirieren lassen. --XRay ^talk 16:01, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:01, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Wiki Loves Earth 2015 - die Organisatoren sagen Danke

Hallo XRay,

am 31. Mai 2015 endete der Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth, an dem Du mit Deinen Bildern teilgenommen hast. Dafür möchten wir Dir herzlich danken.

Dieses Jahr haben sich 26 Länder am Wettbewerb beteiligt, insgesamt wurden dabei 108.444 Bilder hochgeladen. Aus Deutschland kamen 14.115 Fotos, was einem Anteil von 13 % entspricht. Sehr erfreulich ist die hohe Zahl von 1000 Teilnehmern allein beim deutschen Wettbewerb. Einen Überblick findest du auf unserer Ergebnisseite.

Die deutsche Jury hat Ende Juni auf einer Sitzung in Fulda die Top100 und die Preisträger ausgewählt. Eine Entscheidung der internationalen Jury wird noch im Juli erwartet.

Ein anderer Fotowettbewerb steht bereits vor der Tür. Im September findet zum fünften Mal der Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt, bei dem Kultur- und Baudenkmäler bebildert werden sollen. Mit dem Fotografieren dafür kann jetzt schon begonnen werden. Vielleicht möchtest Du Dich sogar an der Organisation dieses Wettbewerbs oder von Wiki Loves Earth 2016 beteiligen?

Wir würden uns über weitere Beiträge von Dir freuen.

Viel Spaß dabei wünscht das Orga-Team.

--Blech ([[User talk:Blech|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:30, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Help

Hi XRay,

Please help me to delete some of pics from my uploads. I was trying to find out nut not understanding anything. Mydreamsparrow ([[User talk:Mydreamsparrow|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:56, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

I'm not an admin, sorry. But for your own images you can try to use this template: Speedydelete. Just add this template to your picture with a reason as parameter. More information about delete requests: Deletion requests. --XRay ^talk 17:01, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

I have applied the way you suggested. Many thanks: Mydreamsparrow ([[User talk:Mydreamsparrow|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:23, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Thank you

Good evening xray,
Thank you for proposing Wikimedia of my photos.
Sincerely,
--Agnes Monkelbaan ([[User talk:Agnes Monkelbaan|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:34, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

:-) I've seen your photographs and I like them. --XRay ^talk 18:55, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Template:FPC-notice -- Christian Ferrer 13:05, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Many Thanks for your nomination. --XRay ^talk 20:25, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:03, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion -- Christian Ferrer 05:06, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Congratulations

Hello, thanks for your magnifical picture of statues of ND de Paris. At the time when there was a podium in front, I think to make this picture in panorama, but I think also that another commonist will do it, and I am not a very good user of panorama. The picture is done now, the time to do it will not be again possible for many years. Great thank and best regards. - Siren-Com ([[User talk:Siren-Com|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:34, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. I am pleased that you like the picture. --XRay ^talk 16:53, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Vielen Dank

Guten Abend -XRay,
Erhalten Sie Ihre Nachricht ein. Ich habe durch zu übersetzen ins Niederländische übersetzt und gespeichert Übersetzung, so dass ich, wenn ich brauche, um wieder zu lesen. Vielen Dank für Ihre Erklärung.
Grüße aus Famberhorst.

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Nationaal Park Drents-Friese Wold.Locatie Fochteloërveen.jpg

Good evening XRay,
Thank you for nominating File: National Park Drents-Friese Wold.Locatie Fochteloërveen.jpg
Sincerely,
--Agnes Monkelbaan ([[User talk:Agnes Monkelbaan|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:12, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

:-) --XRay ^talk 17:17, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:38, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Review of File:Lobo Guará urinating on tree.jpg

Hi XRay, can you help me to understand some technical terms used in your review of the image File:Lobo Guará urinating on tree.jpg? When you say "DoF isn't good", i known that it means depth of field, but in practice, what need to be better? Please, note that i don´t want to change your review, but just understand this technical issues to improve my judgement when nomimnating next time. thanks Rodrigolopes ([[User talk:Rodrigolopes|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:08, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

The depth of field becomes better with a smaller aperture. Your choice was f/2.8. For your image f/5.6 or f/8 may be better. --XRay ^talk 03:39, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:41, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:02, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen

Hallo XRay,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

ehemalige QI nom von mir

(Ich habe dies ins Deutsche zu Ihrem Vorteil übersetzt. Blame Google für Fehler, nicht ich Template:Smiley).

Es tut mir leid es so lange gedauert, aber ich habe endlich in der Lage, Ihre Anmerkungen und chromatische Aberration und Farbe in Adresse File: Rose Pergola at Kew Gardens.jpg durch Hochladen einer neuen Version. Haben diese Fragen zu Ihrer Zufriedenheit angegangen? Wenn dem so ist werde ich es renominate so können Sie es zu fördern. Wenn nicht, gut, können wir weitermachen. Daniel Case ([[User talk:Daniel Case|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:38, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

IMO there are only minor problems. Removing CAs is just one mouse click with Lightroom. But why do you ask? You are a good photographer and it's your decision to nominate the image. --XRay ^talk 19:32, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

I actually use Bridge to edit my raw files, and did make that click. Sometimes it's not enough I guess.

I asked since you had made the comments, and I was unable to fix the image for a while. So I felt I owed you the courtesy. Daniel Case ([[User talk:Daniel Case|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:05, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

It is really nice of you. I wish you success in the Nomination. --XRay ^talk 05:03, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:37, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2015

Beste deelnemer,

Bedankt voor het insturen van jouw foto’s van cultureel erfgoed in het kader van Wiki Loves Monuments 2015. Een professionele jury kiest straks uit alle inzendingen de beste foto’s in drie categorieën: beste foto van een monument, beste foto van een ornament en beste foto van een Dudok monument. Daarnaast is er ook een speciaal klassement voor de inzenders van de meeste foto’s van unieke monumenten. Wil jij ook kans maken op één van de vele prijzen, beschikbaar gesteld door onze partners en sponsoren? Vergeet dan niet om op Wikimedia Commons, onder voorkeuren (rechts bovenin, naast je gebruikersnaam) het vinkje bij e-mail van andere gebruikers toestaan (onder het kopje e-mail in het gebruikersprofiel), aan te vinken. Alleen deelnemers met een e-mailadres maken kans op prijzen. Benieuwd welke prijzen je allemaal kunt winnen? Kijk dan op http://www.wikimedia.nl/projectpagina/prijzenoverzicht

Groeten,

De Wiki Loves Monuments werkgroep 2015 13:20, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

User:XRay/Templates/Notes

Hi, XRay. May I use your template User:XRay/Templates/Notes?, Regards. --Laitche ([[User talk:Laitche|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:42, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Yes, feel free and use it. But please use a copy of this template. My template may change at any time.--XRay ^talk 05:07, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you so much! --Laitche ([[User talk:Laitche|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:11, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

+1 Good idea XRay with this template, I will create mine too...:) --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:17, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:02, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:45, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:36, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:43, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Your review commentary

Hello! Please let me know how sharpness on your photo is different from sharpness on my photo. This is a commentary to your review. Thank you. И. Максим ([[User talk:Massalim|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

I'll check it. BTW: You can change the review to "discuss" if you have another opinion. --XRay ^talk 20:10, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

I answered in the opened discussion. И. Максим ([[User talk:Massalim|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:41, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:39, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Category "parks"

Guten Morgen, Dietmar. Erst mal Danke für Dein unermüdliches Arbeiten an den Kategorien. Auch die neue Kategorie Park finde ich sehr gut, hätte mir allerdings eine Differenzierung gewünscht. Bisher sind nur Bilder von Nationalparks darin, insofern wäre die Kategorie "national parks" angebracht. Ich befürchte nämlich, dass bald auch Bilder vom Stadtpark Hintertupfing oder den Gartenanlagen der Flora darin auftauchen, für die dann in der Tat die Kategorie "park" wünschenswert wäre. Vielleicht wäre das eine Gelegenheit für eine neue Kategorie Template:Smile Gruss, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:58, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Eigentlich wollte ich die Kategorie für Stadtparks, Wildparks etc. haben. Und ich habe das Dilemma mit den Nationalparks schon gesehen. Ich denke, dass ich noch zwei Subkategorien anlege, für Nationalparks und architektonische Parks. --XRay ^talk 07:11, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Ich habe erst einmal die QI-Kategorie für die Nationalparks angelegt. Das dürfte auch schon ausreichen. Mal schauen, ob's ausreichend ist. BTW: Hast du dir die Kategorie Category:Parks mal angesehen? Sie ist auch eher allgemein gehalten. Unter "by type" gibt es dann zahlreichen differenziertere Möglichkeiten. --XRay ^talk 07:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Vielleicht würde eine Untergliederung in "Quality images of gardens and parks" und "Quality images of national parks" dem besser Rechnng tragen. Weil ich sehe schon einen deutlichen Unterschied zwischen einem durch die Natur modellierten Nationalpark und den architektonisch gestalteten Gärten und Parks. Man sollte dabei im Auge behalten, dass wir hier eine Untergliederung unterhalb dem Topic "Landschaften" haben wollen. Dazu würde ich dann "Gärten und Parkanlagen" eigentlich weniger zurechnen. Gruß, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:19, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Category:Quality images of gardens and parks habe ich angelegt. Ob das allerdings der Weisheit letzter Schluss ist, weiß ich auch nicht. "Parks" ist doch recht allgemein. Vielleicht fällt uns ja noch etwas ein. --XRay ^talk 11:27, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Ob ein Fluchtfilter in die Kategorie Maschinen gehörte wage ich stark zu bezweifeln. Das widerspricht schon der Definition einer Maschine, wie sie z.B. in der Maschinenrichtlinie festgelegt ist: "eine mit einem anderen Antriebssystem als der unmittelbar eingesetzten menschlichen oder tierischen Kraft ausgestattete oder dafür vorgesehene Gesamtheit miteinander verbundener Teile oder Vorrichtungen, von denen mindestens eines bzw. eine beweglich ist und die für eine bestimmte Anwendung zusammengefügt sind". Also an diesem Filter ist nicht ein einziges bewegliches Teil und er hat auch keinen Antrieb. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:33, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Du hast sicherlich recht. Wenn sich jemand von uns beiden auskennt, dann bist das eher du. ;-) Danke für deine Korrektur. --XRay ^talk 14:49, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:02, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:01, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Dein Kommentar zu Rombergberg-Herbst-Gegenlicht-Aeste-2015.jpg auf QIC

Guten Morgen XRay! Vielen Dank für dein Kommentar auf QIC zu dem oben genannten Bild. Du hast sicher recht, kein typisches QI, eher ein Stimmungsbild. Ich finde allerdings, dass die Bildqualität für eine komplette Gegenlichtaufnahme sehr gut ist - sowohl bezogen auf den Kontrast wie auch auf die sehr geringen Lens Flares - fotografiert mit dem AF-S 24-70mm. Hättest du eine höhere Bildqualität bei so einer Aufnahme erwartet? Noch eine Frage an dich gerichtet, da du viel Erfahrung mit derlei Stimmungsbildern hast: Würdest du die Tiefen selektiv entrauschen, also insbesondere die Astbereiche? Mich selbst stört das dortige Rauschen nicht wirklich. Ich setze in der Regel eine höhere Priorität auf den Erhalt von Details. Ich habe auch noch eine HDRI-Version:

• HDRI-Verison

Was hälst du davon? Allerdings ist HDR gerade bei aus der Hand fotografierten Blättern etwas heikel. Wenn du genau hinschaust wirst du einige Unzulänglichkeiten entdecken. --Tuxyso ([[User talk:Tuxyso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:21, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Da fragst du mich? Irgendwie sind wir uns doch recht ähnlich bezüglich der Fotografiethemen. ;-) Ich habe dein Bild heute früh gesehen und es direkt positiv bewertet. Manch einer der Mitstreiter hätte das schöne Bild wahrscheinlich abgelehnt. Es hat mit Bezug auf QI kleine technische Mängel, aber meiner Meinung nach gehört Lens Flare bei derartigen nun einmal durchaus dazu. Aber andere bewerten anders, da bin ich denn auch hin und wieder sehr verwundert. (Auch wenn manch eines meiner Bilder zu recht abgelehnt wird - es rutschen mir zu meinem eigenen Ärger leider hin und wieder welche durch -, bin ich bei manch einem Kommentar doch mehr als verwundert. Die außergewöhnlichste Kritik war allerdings bisher in der deutschen FP, bei der mir ein zu hart eingestellter Blitz unterstellt wurde. Das ärgert mich noch heute ein wenig, denn die Belehrung war mehr als fehl am Platze. Ich hatte gar keinen Blitz verwendet und auch darauf hingewiesen, es war einfach nur das Umgebungslicht. Aber derlei Kritik gibt's auch bei QI. Ich denke nur daran, dass lange sehr auf senkrechte Linien geachtet wurde, auch denn die Aufnahme dazu überhaupt nicht passte.) Nun aber zu deiner HDRI-Version. Ganz ehrlich: Das normale Bild bei QI ist besser, auch wegen der Details. Bei der Lichtstimmung reicht meiner Meinung nach die Entwicklung aus dem RAW aus. Die eher seichte Darstellung des HDRI liegt aber mitunter daran, dass HDRI beim Mapping nicht passend ausgenutzt wird. Meine ersten Ausflüge mit Picturenaut, Luminance HDR, Adobe Photoshop Elements und Adobe Lightroom machten zwar Lust auf mehr, erst mit Photomatix kam ich wirklich weiter - auch wenn ich noch immer ausprobiere. Dein HDRI-Bild finde ich insgesamt zu hell. Das kommt der Stimmung nicht zugute. Die Schatten würde ich entrauschen, vielleicht auch vor dem Aufbau des HDRI. Es reicht auch die Bearbeitung der unterbelichteten Bilder. Machst du die HDRIs aus den RAW-Daten? Und die Probleme mit HDRI in der freien Natur kann ich durchaus nachvollziehen. Selbst bei ganz kurzen Belichtungszeiten bewegen sich oft die Blätter zu stark. Und aus der Hand wird's nicht einfacher. --XRay ^talk 09:53, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Zu de-WP sag' ich besser nichts. Z.T wird doch hanebüchener Unsinn erzählt - aktuell läuft ein Disput bzgl. horizontal entzerrter Bilder. Mein Argument, dass ich die Kamera schlicht horizontal ausrichte und die Fotos so aufnehme, ist den dortigen "Experten" egal - die Bilder sind zu stark entzerrt und deswegen Mist.
Ich verwende bei HDRI / HDRs (ich nennen sie jetzt einfach mal alle HDRs) nach Lust und Laune drei Varianten:

1. Mit Lightroom 6: kompletter HDR-Workflow in Lightroom - so ist auch das oben verlinkte Bild entstanden
2. Zusammenfügung mit Photomatix zu einem 32-Bit-Tiff - Tonemapping dann in Lightroom
3. Kompletter HDR-Erstellung mit Photomatix. Als Prozess verwende ich dann nahezu ausschließlich Exposure Fusion und nicht Tonemapping.

Was nutzt du? Womit erzielst du die besten Ergebnisse? Ich bearbeite die RAWs selbst bei der dritten Varianten mit Lightroom vor und exportiere sie dann nach Photomatix. Direkt mit den NEFs arbeite ich in Photomatix nicht. Wenn es meine Zeit zulässt werde ich für das besprochene Bild mal unterschiedliche Varianten austesten und dich dann ggf. noch mal dazu befragen. Grüße, --Tuxyso ([[User talk:Tuxyso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:26, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Meist gebe ich die RAW-Dateien direkt an Photomatix. Dabei arbeite ich sie leicht nach und exportiere dann in 16-Bit-TIFFs. Diese erhalten dann den letzten Feinschliff mit Adobe Lightroom. Das dürfte deinem Weg ähnlich sein. Hin und wieder gibt es Ausnahmen von dieser Folge. (Und deine Stimm-Enthaltung bzgl. de-FP kann ich verstehen. Derzeit nominiere ich dort nicht mehr - aus verschiedenen Gründen. Es kostet insgesamt alles zu viel Zeit, ich gehe lieber nach draußen zum Fotografieren.) --XRay ^talk 11:35, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Ich habe mal unterschiedliche Varianten durchprobiert. In der Tat erhalte ich mit der eingebauten HDRI-Funktion von LR 6 das aus meiner Sicht beste Resultat. Ich habe im vorliegenden Fall auch nur zwei Fotos gemacht. Ich habe den Eindruck, dass Photomatix damit generell Probleme hat - das möchte mindestens drei Fotos haben. --Tuxyso ([[User talk:Tuxyso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:29, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:02, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:03, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:01, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:37, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:39, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:42, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Glückwünsche

Hallo Dietmar, erst jetzt habe ich die Auswertung von "Wiki Loves Monuments" wahrgenommen (dachte, dies dauert angesichts der Menge an Bildern viel länger) und will natürlich nicht versäumen, Dir etwas verspätet, aber dafür um so herzlicher zu Deiner erneut erfolgreichen Teilnahme zu gratulieren. Aber das ist natürlich sehr verdient angesichts Deiner unzähligen beeindruckenden Aufnahmen. Man bekommt auf Deiner Diskussionsseite vor lauter Quality Image Promotions (und mehr) ja kaum noch einen Kommentar dazwischen... Ich kann mir daran immer nur wieder ein Beispiel nehmen und vielleicht das ein oder andere davon lernen. Viele Grüße und weiterhin so erfolgreiches Schaffen im ehrenamtlichen Dienst für die Allgemeinheit! --J.-H. Janßen ([[User talk:J.-H. Janßen|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:52, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Vielen Dank! Auch wenn die Einträge auf meiner Seite derzeit etwas einseitig sind, entgeht mir glücklicherweise nicht. --XRay ^talk 18:15, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:39, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:37, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:43, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:43, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:35, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Please help me

Hello XRay, can you help me to correct CCW on my photo I'm new and I do not Know How To correct CCW ?https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0f/%D4%BF%D5%A1%D5%B5%D5%A1%D6%80%D5%A1%D5%B6%D4%B5%D6%80%D5%AF2.jpg

thanks in advance --Armenak Margarian ([[User talk:Armenak Margarian|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:19, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Just try to correct the perspective. CCW is "counter clockwise". I'm correcting these problems with Lightroom. If you don't use Lightroom, try ShiftN. It's free. --XRay ^talk 11:25, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

thank you very much i try use Lightroom. --Armenak Margarian ([[User talk:Armenak Margarian|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:46, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:37, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:39, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:58, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Bot/Jahr-in-Gemeinde-Kategorien

Hallo XRay, hab grade [6] geändert. Problem: Category:Naturschutzgebiet Emsaue westlich Warendorf liegt in drei Gemeinden, so ist die NSG-Kategorie auch einsortiert. Dein Bot hat daraus nur auf eine Gemeinde geschlossen (Telgte). Die verschiedenen Bilder in solchen Kategorien sind auch nicht immer eindeutig einer Gemeinde zugeordnet. In dem beispiel konnt ich das korrigieren (Warendorf) weil Koordinaten dabei waren. Hab von deinem Bot noch mehr Jahr-in-Gemeinde-Kategorisierungen auf der Beobachtungsliste. Das dürfte jetzt auch bei anderen NSG-Bildern nicht stimmen. Vielleicht kannst du das Mal durchgucken (ua. alles in Category:2015 in Telgte) und deinem Bot was neues beibringen? vielleicht sowas wie "prüfe vorher, ob noch andere Gemeinde-kategorien drin sind, dann besser nichts ändern". Hier noch ein 2. beispiel [7], wo die Kategorie wohl zufällig passt, hätte aber genauso Rhede statt Borken sein können (wobei das Bild auch NL-Gebiet zeigen kann, scheint genau auf der Grenze aufgenommen zu sein, aber das ist ein Sonderfall). Holger1959 ([[User talk:Holger1959|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:10, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Moin! Der Bot lässt eigentlich alles aus, was schon in irgendeiner "Jahr in ..."-Kategorie einsortiert ist. Im Falle des Naturschutzgebietes kam halt "T" (Telgte) vor "W" (Warendorf). Wenn etwas zu mehreren Gemeinden gehört, fällt es nicht nur meinem Bot schwer, das zu erkennen. ;-) Am besten ist halt das Bild bereits einsortiert, dann ist das für den Bot egal, er macht dann nichts. Das Naturschutzgebiet setze ich auf meine Ausnahmeliste, dann wird's nicht mehr geprüft. (Der Bot läuft nur im Münsterland. Da kenne ich mich noch gut genug aus - mit Ausnahmen -. Ansonsten wäre es problematisch. Und für die Ausnahmen habe ich dann auch eine Ausnahmeliste für Dateien und Kategorien.) --XRay ^talk 06:25, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Copvio

Hallo XRay, ich erinnere mich noch anden Stammtisch in MS, wo Du sagtest, dass man für Innenaufnahmen eine gesonderte Genehmigung braucht. Jetzt hatte ich ganz viele Altfälle mit der Vorlage CopyrightViolation versehen, diese wurden aber alle von Benutzer Yann revertiert, ohne dafür einen Grund zu nennen. Vielleicht versuchst Du es einmal ihm auf Englisch die Sachlage in D darzulegen, da er laut Info auf seiner Benutzerseite kein deutsch spricht, kann ich das leider nicht selber, da mein Englisch dafür leider nicht reicht. Danke und viele Grüße --Netzhering ([[User talk:Netzhering|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:43, 6 December 2015 (UTC) P.S.: Interessant wäre allerdings noch, wenn Benutzer den Löschantrag entfernen, wer ist denn dann verantwortlich, es wäre ja nicht fair, wenn man mich meinen Fehler nicht korrigieren lässt, aber die Verantwortung bliebe bei mir?? Vielleicht weisst Du als wesentlich erfahrener Fotograf etwas mehr als ich? Abbschliessend sei gesagt, dass ich mich wohl nie wieder so naiv und vertrauensselig verhalten werde, wenn ich hier auf Betonköpfe stosse, die mich mit meiner heiklen Sache zappeln lassen. Ich kann nur andere davor warnen, sich bei Projekten mit international unterschiedlichen Gesetzen wie diesem hier zu engagieren, wenn man hinterher auf einem Schleudersitz sitzt. PPS.: Oder war es die falsche Vorlage, evtl diese hier {subst:npd}} (ich hatte {copvio:reason}} benutzt).

Ganz so schlimm sehe ich es nicht. Es hat nicht jeder Zeit, auch die richtigen Antworten zu geben. Da wird schnell mal was zurückgesetzt, was als nicht richtig angesehen wird. In dem Fall der Innenaufnahmen sind es - wenn ich es richtig gesehen habe - bei dir nur Kircheninnenaufnahmen. Klar, das sind Innenaufnahmen und ich lasse sie mir auch alle genehmigen. Sonst stelle ich hier nichts ein. Ich hatte unlängst eine größere Anzahl zum Löschen gegeben. War ärgerlich, aber sicherlich auch mein Fehler. Und ich bin wahrscheinlich auch recht penibel, was derartige Dinge angeht. Es ist aber so, dass Kircheninnenaufnahmen oft toleriert werden. Das ist keine Zustimmung, aber es ist so. Ich habe hier schon manche Aufnahme gesehen, die ich nicht hier hochgeladen hätte. Dazu gehören auch Innenaufnahmen von Museen. Deine Innenaufnahmen sind meiner Meinung nach keine Copyright-Verletzung (CopyVio). Es ist ja nichts angebildet, was mit Copyright belegt ist. Die Urheber der Bilder und Statuen in den Kirchen sind in der Regel seit mehr als 70 Jahren verstorben, also kein Problem. Bei modernen Kirchen wäre ich da vorsichtiger. Was du aber eigentlich benötigst, ist eine Zustimmung, um dort überhaupt Aufnahmen machen zu dürfen. Das ist eher Hausrecht. Aber ich bin halt auch kein Rechtsexperte, nur ein Amateurfotograf, der sich - manchmal ein wenig frustriert - die vielen Rahmenbedingungen ansieht, die uns Amateure einschränken. (Mit Unbehagen schaue ich auf die vielen meiner Meinung nach unrealistischen Bestrebungen bezüglich der Panoramafreiheit seitens eines EU-Kommissars und CDU-Politikers in Brüssel. Aber das ist ein anderes Thema.) Und was die Rechtslage bei diesem internationalen Projekt hier angeht: Meine Meinung nach ist immer das Recht des Landes zu beachten, in dem die Aufnahme entstand, und das amerikanische Recht, weil dort die Server stehen. Mehr muss ich nicht berücksichtigen. Sicherlich gibt es noch ein paar grundsätzliche Dinge, wie Persönlichkeits- und Markenrecht. Auf diese Umstände sollte man dann noch hinweisen. Und bezogen auf deine genannten "Betonköpfe". Es sind hier alles Freiwillige, das sollte man achten und beachten. Du kannst Fragen im Forum stellen - in deutsch. Ich bin mir ziemlich sicher, dass du auch dort eine (wahrscheinlich hilfreiche) Antwort erhälst.--XRay ^talk 09:27, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi danke für die ausführliche Info, ich könnte ruhiger schalfen, wenn die Bilde weg wären. wie ich gerades ehe, hat yann nur die aus Asbeck revertiert, das war mir erst unklar, tja, jetzt war mein editieren ein schuss ins eigene knie, jetzt drängt er auf wiederherstellung. ich sage nur NIE WIEDER!!!! na ja Du kannst nix dafür, schönes we, aber hier wirst Du nie wieder was lesen aund auch bei wikipedia nixcht, Wünsche Dir ein schönesn leben Wer weiss ob wir uns imm RL jemalas sehen Ciao! --Netzhering ([[User talk:Netzhering|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:44, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Hallo XRay, der hier so höfliche Netzhering kommt auf meiner Disk (Template:Diff) ganz anders rüber. Das Ganze ist nur vorgeschoben. In Wirklichkeit ist es eine Racheaktion, weil er bzw. seine Nachfolgesocken Fliegenfuss etc. pp. auf de-wiki wegen seiner wiederholten Pöbeleien und Tiraden gesperrt wurden. Soviel zum Hintergrund. Dir einen schönen Sonntag. --Watzmann ^Talk 13:41, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Der Streit geht um die lit. farbe am Palmsonntag, die vor 1955 violett war, der de-wiki-aertikel sagt aber rot. das stimmt nicht. Und um ein Palmstockbild, dass mehrfacgh Turris Davidva entfernte, jetzt wo ich gesperrt bin, häng Watzmann sein Fähnchen in den richtigen Wind, zuvor war er sprachlos inn dieser Sache. --Netzhering ([[User talk:Netzhering|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:07, 6 December 2015 (UTC) ABer mach Dir selber ein Bild von Watzmanns chamäleonmarotten... Übrigens, hat Watzmann über Unhöfichkeiten und Provokationen und arrogantes Begegnen in Diskus der anderen seite nichts einzuwenden. Ein andere sagte mal : "Der Autor wurde nicht immer höflich behandelt" das störte Watzman wenig... Der Streit betraf Watzmann übrigens gar nicht, nun haut er hier gegen mich und meint, die house rule violations soll ich auch weiterhin auf meine Kappe nehmen... P.S.: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer_Diskussion:Thenardier/tarchive --Netzhering ([[User talk:Netzhering|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:14, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

BQ Christuskirche Ibbenbüren

Hallo Xray,

wenn Du Gelegenheit dazu hast, könntest Du die beiden Bilder der Christuskirche Ibbenbüren (vorgeschlagen als QI) begutachten, ob die Perspektivenkorrektur so stimmt. Ich habe die beiden Bilder jetzt mit GIMP korrigiert und neu hochgeladen, bisher habe ich mich nicht mit solchen Bildkorrekturen beschäftigt, daher ist das neu für mich.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Innenansicht_Christuskirche_Ibbenb%C3%BCren_03.JPG https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Innenansicht_Christuskirche_Ibbenb%C3%BCren_06.JPG

Zu den CAs: bist Du sicher, dass da CAs sind? Das ist schliesslich ein farbiges Kirchenfenster! Falls ja: Wie könnte ich so etwas korrigieren?

In jedem Fall danke, ich werde in Zukunft versuchen, mehr auf bestimmte Dinge zu achten.

Viele Grüsse,

Basotxerri

Ich schaue immer wieder nach Bildern, bei denen ich Verbesserungsvorschläge gemacht habe. Voraussetzung ist, dass dies bei dem jeweiligen Bild bei den QIC (mit der Vorlage "Done".) vermerkt ist. Das ist eine übliche Vorgehensweise bei QIC.
Perspektivkorrekturen kann man übrigens auch mit ShiftN oder Lightroom machen.
Und ja, ich bin mir ziemlich sicher, dass es CAs sind. Kirchenfenster sind zwar oft farbig und das kann in die Irre führen, aber Lage und Farbe deuten auf CAs hin. Entfernen kann man sie beispielsweise mit Lightroom. Ist im Grunde ein Mausklick. --XRay ^talk 21:00, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Ach ja, "XRay", nicht "Xray". Ist ein anderer User. Und bitte mit --~~~~ unterschreiben. Ist so üblich. --XRay ^talk 21:03, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

OK, danke! --Basotxerri ([[User talk:Basotxerri|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:25, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:39, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Danke für Deine Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2015!

Template:WLM 2015 Danke

Template:WLM 2015 Danke

Template:WLM 2015 Danke

Hallo XRay!

Vielen Dank, dass Du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 mitgemacht und Deine Fotos von Kulturdenkmalen mit der ganzen Welt geteilt hast! Weltweit wurden im Rahmen des Wettbewerbs über 230.000 Bilder hochgeladen. 38.953 davon stammen allein aus Deutschland, wo sich 866 Teilnehmer beteiligt haben.
Hier findest Du weitere statistische Informationen zu den Ergebnissen von Wiki Loves Monuments 2015.

Und so geht’s jetzt mit dem Wettbewerb weiter:

• Die WLM-Vorjury hat alle im Rahmen des Wettbewerbs hochgeladenen Bilder gesichtet und bewertet.
• Vom 16. bis 18. Oktober tagte die Hauptjury in Fulda und legte auf Basis der Vorjury-Bewertungen die Platzierung der besten Aufnahmen fest. In der darauf folgenden Woche wurden dann die besten Bilder des Wettbewerbs und natürlich die Preisträger veröffentlicht.
• Für die Vergabe unserer tollen WLM-Preise wird dann Wikimedia Deutschland in den Wochen bis Weihnachten nach und nach alle Preisträger anschreiben und bitten, sich einen Preis aus unserem Sachpreispool auszusuchen. Bitte sorge daher dafür, dass Du in Deinen Account-Einstellungen Deine E-Mail-Adresse hinterlegt hast und auf ggf. dort ankommende Mails innerhalb von höchstens einer Woche antwortest.

Auch wenn der diesjährige Wettbewerb jetzt vorbei ist, möchten wir Dich einladen, auch weiterhin Fotos hochzuladen und bei der Pflege von Wikipedia-Artikeln und Listen zu helfen. Wikipedia und Wikimedia Commons leben durch Menschen wie Dich, die ehrenamtlich helfen, freie Inhalte zu erstellen und für alle zugänglich zu machen. Weitere Informationen dazu, wie genau Du an der Wikipedia mitarbeiten kannst, findest Du in unserem Tutorial, und wenn Du Dir dabei eine persönliche Unterstützung wünschst, kannst Du Dich einfach an unser Mentorenprogramm wenden.

Viel Glück für den Wettbewerb und viel Spaß bei der weiteren Mitarbeit in der Wikipedia und hier auf Commons wünscht Dir das Wiki Loves Monuments Team Deutschland 2015 (Sebastian Wallroth ([[User talk:Sebastian Wallroth|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:33, 10 December 2015 (UTC))

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Hiddencat für Cat Photographs taken on

ist eben kein Einzelfall. Eine insbesondere allgemeine Diskussion wäre vor Deiner Änderung angezeigt gewesen. Photographs taken on navbox.. reicht wegen der Sichtbarkeit im Hauptkategorieteil nicht aus.--Oursana ([[User talk:Oursana|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:44, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Die Diskussion hat es gegeben. Ehrlich gesagt fand ich sie nicht wieder. Aber wir können sie gerne noch einmal aktivieren. Ich war auch ein Vertreter, der die Kategorie verstecken wollte. Aber im Ansatz direkt beim Template, denn das hat den Vorteil, dass es sofort für alle wirkt. Die Mischsituation ist sicherlich wenig attraktiv. Was meinst du, sollen wir die Diskussion erneut führen? --XRay ^talk 07:27, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Ach: Und danke für deinen Link. Der fehlte mir ehrlich gesagt. Mit CatScan hatte ich es nicht hinbekommen. Der Vollständigkeit halber passe ich die anderen Kategorien auch noch an. Und wenn die Kategorien dann versteckt werden sollen, ergänzen wir "HiddenCat" beim Template.--XRay ^talk 07:29, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Ja bitte unbedingt wieder diskutieren, vielleicht findest Du die Diskussion. Hast Du Suchtipps?--Oursana ([[User talk:Oursana|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:56, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Ich einen kurzen Hinweis auf der Diskussion zum Template eingefügt. Allerdings bin ich mir nicht ganz sicher, ob es genug Beachtung findet. Aber vielleicht sollten wir trotzdem da das Thema noch einmal aufnehmen. Mach doch einfach auf der Diskussionsseite den Vorschlag. Ich schaue aber noch mal, ob ich den Austausch noch finde. --XRay ^talk 14:08, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:42, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:47, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Picture of the day

Hello! Why you removed my picture File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Erdbeerfeld -- 2015 -- 6492-6.jpg as picture of the day on 2016-06-04? --XRay ^talk 21:28, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi - you were too quick, sorry - I was about to tell you that I have moved it to the next day as the 4th June is Butterfly Education and Awareness Day. I hope you don't mind - I know it was the day you took the image, but butterflies are really important!! Charles ([[User talk:Charlesjsharp|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:34, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, just restored. IMO a place is set if there is another picture. IMO you should ask first. May be I have a reason for this date. But I haven't. So if you need the date, please do the switch to the next day again. --XRay ^talk 21:38, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

My mistake, I should have asked, but it didn't say I should in the potd guidelines. I'll know next time (my first day doing potd). Charles ([[User talk:Charlesjsharp|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:41, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Wonderful holidays

Merry Christmas and a happy New Year! --Tremonist ([[User talk:Tremonist|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:01, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

From me the best wishes too! --XRay ^talk 17:08, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

*** Happy holidays! *** 2016! ***

		* * * Happy Holidays 2016 ! * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:05, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much. Best wishes too! --XRay ^talk 06:07, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Improving photos in QI

I fixed this picture, I did a little bit of heaven above the top of the tower. If you feel that my version is worse than yours restore it. --Jacek Halicki ([[User talk:Jacek Halicki|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:28, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. Sorry. The source isn't updated. So I will reprocess the image with my RAW file an upload the new one. --XRay ^talk 10:08, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 31 December 2015 (UTC)